I have made the following webpage available from the Index page of these Updates. The page shares the changes made at houseofnames.com recently, and meanwhile tells a digest of the Templar story as it concerns Caiaphas and other enemies of Jesus Christ:
http://www.tribwatch.com/up/heraldryChanges.htm
As per another enemy of Jesus Christ:
U.S. President Barack Obama's nominee [Samantha Power] for the position of UN ambassador on Wednesday [acted very pro-Israeli in order to get the job...]
...[but in a previous time] Power responded to a hypothetical question and said that if given the opportunity she would advise the president to sacrifice billions of dollars of aid to the Jewish state, allocating the funds instead to "the new state of Palestine."
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/170024
At the time when the world was against Israel for attacking Gaza, Catherine Ashton at the EU was vociferous against Israel. She has been visiting Egypt over the Morsi coup, and has even met with Morsi's supporters (these are, by-and-large, anti-Israeli). Oddly, the American envoy that visited Egypt about the same time did NOT visit with Morsi suporters. What's going on? Obama has yet to rule that a coup took place because, apparently, he wants to give Egypt the money that the U.S. alots the country annually. Much of that money goes to the military...the one that just ousted Morsi in what can only be deemed as a coup. Why is Obama holding back his cards, thinking of supporting this coup? Is he trying to manipulate the Egyptian military by dangling the money before it, to be given only if the military does so-and-so? Probably. The military is now promising new elections soon, and I suppose that, once again, the Muslim Brotherhood can win it again. In the meantime, the interim Egyptian government has closed the smuggling tunnels in Gaza / Sinai, angering Hamas and pleasing Israel.
In an article telling that John Kerry thinks he's getting some new traction on Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, we are reminded: "While Israel has balked at Palestinian demands, the international community has largely rallied behind the Palestinian position on borders and Jewish settlements." While the so-called "international communty" would have a hard time demonizing Israel in the face of terror attacks against it, it would have an easier time demonizing Israel where Israel refused to give Palestinians a "small" tract of land for their own nation. But I say that England should dramatically give up London suburbs to English Muslims before the English start coming down on Israel for not doing something similar. Or, stay out of it, international community, if you don't like the idea of having a small Muslim nation smack beside one of your cherished cities. Is this time of wicked Muslim men the right time to give Palestinians their own nation beside Jerusalem? A deluded Englishman would say, yes. Obama and Kerry do say, yes. But God, even though he has a plan to brutally chastize Israel, says, no. Therein is the seed of Armageddon already, in the "international community," as per God inviting "all" nations to Jerusalem to fight against it, and to say to them: "Zion is Mine. Here I am, the One you didn't count on."
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/07/19/kerry-announces-meeting-in-washington-to-finalize-agreement-on-mideast-peace/?test=latestnews
Good news, perhaps, for the time of Christian persecution in America, and hopefully it will spill over to Europe and beyond too. Leading Democrats are being forced to argue / admit that the NSA went too far in spying on citizens:
Lawmakers of both parties expressed deep skepticism Wednesday about the government's bulk collection of Americans' telephone records and threatened not to renew the legislative authority that has been used to sanction a program described as "off the tracks legally."
The backlash appeared to focus on the concern that the Obama administration's interpretation of its powers far exceeds what lawmakers intended. At a hearing of the House Judiciary Committee, lawmakers forcefully pressed officials from the National Security Agency, the Justice Department, the FBI and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to justify the government's collection and storage of the communications records of vast numbers of Americans.
..."This is unsustainable, it's outrageous and must be stopped immediately," said Rep. John Conyers Jr. (Mich.), the highest-ranking Democrat on the panel.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/house-committee-holds-hearing-on-nsa-surveillance-programs/2013/07/17/ffc3056c-eee3-11e2-9008-61e94a7ea20d_story.html?hpid=z1
Of note is the change of tune by many Republicans, who, the week earlier, were all for the NSA methods of spying. The article goes on to show how your Christian friends / relatives can be spied on if merely you are suspect as a person of interest:
"The court has approved us to go out two or three 'hops,'" NSA Deputy Director John C. Inglis said. "And it's often at the second hop" that information is gained that leads the FBI to investigate the person's contacts further.
A "hop" refers to the way in which analysts broaden their analysis. When analysts think they have cause to suspect an individual, they will look at everyone that person has contacted, called the first hop away from the target. Then, in a series of exponential ripples, they look at everyone all those secondary people communicated with. And from that pool, they look at everyone those tertiary people contacted. This is called a second and a third hop.
Jameel Jaffer, deputy legal director at the American Civil Liberties Union, said that the NSA has been trying to make it seem as though it peeks at the communications of a tiny subset of people, but that with such hops, it has reviewed the communication patterns of millions.
It is more justifiable for the people to spy on their government than vice-versa, because the people pay the government workers. That is, the people are the boss, and the government workers are employees. People therefore have some right to keep tabs on government workers to assure that they are working honestly, doing only what they are paid to do. The people never had in mind that the government should grow into its own organism that uses (and abuses) the people in order to continue growing larger and more aloof from the people's agendas. Obama is merely a government worker, not a king. Right? He doesn't have the right to spy on you. Let's get that right. He didn't even ask if you wish to be spied on for the sake of fighting the terrorism...because he's spying for other reasons. It is clear that there is an anti-Christian movement developing hard-core in the Democrat camp. The plans are being drawn up as we speak, part of the evidence being in the IRS scandal. Here's an update:
The Obama appointee implicated in congressional testimony in the IRS targeting scandal met with President Obama in the White House two days before offering his colleagues a new set of advice on how to scrutinize tea party and conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status.
IRS chief counsel William Wilkins, who was named in House Oversight testimony by retiring IRS agent Carter Hull as one of his supervisors in the improper targeting of conservative groups, met with Obama in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on April 23, 2012. Wilkins'; boss, then-IRS commissioner Douglas Shulman, visited the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on April 24, 2012, according to White House visitor logs.
On April 25, 2012, Wilkins' office sent the exempt organizations determinations unit "additional comments on the draft guidance" for approving or denying tea party tax-exempt applications, according to the IRS inspector general's report.
...Wilkins' meeting with Obama on April 23 was attended by 13 people.
Wilkins, who is one of only two Obama appointees at the IRS, is a former lobbyist with the firm WilmerHale, where he spent his time "counseling nonprofit organizations, business entities, and investment funds on tax compliance, business transactions, and government investigations." At the firm, Wilkins defended Rev. Jeremiah Wright's Chicago-based United Church of Christ from a 2008 investigation into whether Wright violated his church's nonprofit status by speaking in favor of Obama. Wilkins successfully defended Wright's church pro bono.
The White House did not return a request for comment.
http://dailycaller.com/2013/07/22/embattled-irs-chief-counsel-met-with-obama-2-days-before-writing-new-targeting-criteria/
Now you know why Wilkins and Obama must be good friends. The Wilkins Coat uses what I say is a version of the Schere/Scherf Coat, and with the green Vere / Varni wyvern used also by Guerra's. Vere's thus trace to Guido Guerra in the area of northern Italy that was home to the enemies of Jesus Christ.
The NSA States of America is not liked very much these days:
The European Commission said today it will be conducting a hasty security sweep of its buildings for American bugs after more leaked documents from ex-National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden described a vast U.S. spying program that targeted the offices of adversaries and allies alike.
"In light of the allegations... [E.U.] President [Jose] Barroso has instructed the competent commission services to proceed to a comprehensive ad hoc security sweep and check," E.U. spokesperson Pia Ahrenkilde told reporters today. "This is disturbing news. If proven true, they demand full clarification."
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/eu-sweep-bugs-amid-us-spying-claims/story?id=19545023
House against house cannot stand. The leader of the "free" world has violated the embassies of the EU, entered within without permission, and spied on the higfhest levels. It is illegal for the United States to enter another nation's embassy uninvited, but here Obama has spied on the embassies, entered into their most-private rooms. Shame, great shame, and yet he and kerry are justifying the spying by leveling accusations against everyone else, because "they all do it." Shameful is the way in which this is being handled, without an apology.
If we're waiting for the Sunni to be at war with the New Iraq, the war may have already begun:
...some 20,000 Iraqi soldiers moved to the 600 kilometer long Syrian border two months ago and began attacking Sunni terrorists and blocking their movement across the border. The main objective of this operation was to halt support for Syrian rebels by Iraqi Sunni and to keep the road to Syria open for Iranian supply convoys (for Syrian government forces and pro-government militias). The Iraqi troops are attacking known Sunni terrorist and smuggler bases along the border.
The Sunnis on both sides of the border are fighting back but these Sunnis are also fighting each other. Since Saddam fell the Sunni Arabs have always been divided into Islamic radical and Sunni nationalist factions. The Islamic radicals (best typified by al Qaeda) want a religious dictatorship, while the Sunni nationalists want a more secular Sunni dominated government (like Saddam's). This rivalry has proved disastrous for the Sunni cause. In Iraq, the Sunni Nationalists turned on the Sunni Islamic radicals in 2007, fearing that all Sunnis would be killed or driven out of Iraq and that led to the collapse of the Sunni terror campaign. This had begun in 2004, as Saddam's "Plan B" (in the event his government was overthrown, as it was in 2003). The terror campaign was to eventually put the Sunni Arabs back in power, but the brutality of the Sunni Islamic terrorists (deliberately killing Shia women and children in large numbers) turned most public opinion in the Moslem world against the Sunni terror campaign. The Sunni Nationalists wanted to concentrate their attacks on Shia security forces and politicians, but the Sunni Islamic terror groups just wanted to kill as many Shia as possible...
http://www.aina.org/news/2013072103949.htm
The two groups of Sunni mentioned above were pegged (in my Iraq chapters) as the two broken entities of Daniel 11:21-23, broken when George Bush invaded Iraq. I predicted that these two groups would have futility against the New Iraq until they join the anti-Christ. I might be wrong. I might be right. I assess my own predictions critically, but thus far I have not deviated from the idea of the two Sunni groups joining the "king of the north," who is the so-called "Assyrian" of Isaiah 14:25, the one who wants a throne above the stars of God. As Isaiah 13 calls him the "king of Babylon" just before a massive military force, at the time of Armageddon, invades his kingdom (of Babylon), I say that we should expect his rise in Iraq, where he will set up a throne. Where else, but Iraq, can end-time Babylon be?
Isaiah goes on after chapter 14 to prophecy end-time events against the area around Israel; in chapter 19, we read that God will pit Egyptian against Egyptian, brother fighting against brotherIn verse 4, the Egyptians are handed over, by God, to a "cruel master," as the NIV puts it. I view this man as the anti-Christ, the "king of the north," the "king of Babylon," the "Assyrian." I have no idea how this same man can be the seven-headed beast of Revelation 17, who makes a phony alliance with "Babylon the Great," what appears to be code for the Roman empire that, at the time of Revelation's writing, ruled over the kings of the earth. Revelation seems to be portraying this seven-headed beast as a ruler of the end-time Roman empire, but how can this difficult thing develop? How can an Assyrian in Iraq, an invader of Israel, Syria, and Egypt, and other Middle-Eastern nations besides, be a ruler of the European Union, or whatever may come after the EU? I'm baffled.
Have we been wrong in viewing Revelation as a book Inspired by God? Which John was it, really, who wrote that book? Is it all untrue that there will be a 666 commercial mark? Will there be no Woman (of Revelation 12) escaping into the wilderness for 3.5 years? Have I been completely wrong in suggesting preparation to resist the skincode? Although these questions came to mind in the past few years, I haven't been willing to throw Revelation off as a false prophecy. I'm simply baffled, and must wait to see what transpires. Theoretically, it is possible that Revelation is a false prophecy, and while Jesus mentions the Daniel and Isaiah prophecies as reliable, no one in the New Testament quotes from Ezekiel. Is the Gog prophecy a false one too? Why do the birds upon the army of the anti-Christ in Revelation 19 reflect the birds of Gog's army in Ezekiel 39? Both Gog and Isaiah's king of Babylon are destroyed upon Israel's mountains.
Yet, Daniel itself indicates that there will be an end-time Roman empire over whom the anti-Christ will rule (see chapter 7). He is depicted as an 11th king in Daniel 7, and yet, because three of the first ten kings are treated as non-players, he will in reality be an 8th king, which is the very theme in Revelation 17. That in itself doesn't prove that Revelation is Inspired, and yet the world is now ready, suddenly, to issue a skincode for commercial purposes...which is why I've taken Revelation seriously all along. What false prophet in his best guess would have predicted the 666 of Revelation 13 more than 1900 years ago?