There was a time when I considered the myths to be the stories of fools, and written for fools. No longer. I now see them as key to understanding the origin, history and Satanic culture of Rosicrucians and other similar societies. Greek myths were encoded historical accounts of Trojan bloodlines, bloodlines still held sacred by modern secret-society members at the helms of Illuminati circles.

It is very curious that an abundance of Greek-theater writings of the Trojan-history period, expected by modern historians to exist somewhere, are not available to them. Historians view this situation as a "dark age" within the Troy region. But it seems easier for me to believe that secret societies had pilfered writings, slowly but surely and at every opportunity over the centuries, to keep the world from knowing true Trojan history, than it is for me to believe that the various peoples of the Greek theater went into a long/uneventful drowse wherein they ceased writing for a few centuries.

With most writings pilfered, the re-writing of Trojan history is thereby made possible, and we need only to ask what sort of sinister disease of the soul had hold of these societies if they needed to go to such lengths, on top of providing the many myths, to hide their heritage.

What the myth writers wished to conceal with encoded language has instead been laid wide open in this day of easy-information access, because wild illustrations in myths are no longer that difficult to decipher with a little Internet digging. I can even see the symbolism in Revelation as God's response to the symbolism in the myths. For example, in the myths the Trojan line is depicted as a dragon in a pool of Ares (at some point prior to 1000 BC). Then, after being killed, the same dragon comes to life again in Caucasia, where it protects the Golden Fleece in a grove of Ares, the god of war sacred to ancient Amazons, a Meshech/Scythian peoples originating in old Aria/Eran i.e. now in Iran. It has become my belief that the Golden Fleece was a depiction of a sacred Trojan bloodline stationed in Phrygia. I, and even some Merovingian-related secret societies who hold it dear, call this the "dragon bloodline."

Even the prophecies of Daniel concerning the anti-Christ seem to be Written as a reflection of the Trojan dragon line. For example, I learned that the proto-Trojans invented metal, bronze first and later silver and finally iron, the very metals used by Daniel to depict the Medo-Persian, Greek and Roman empires. Although I was able to trace the Trojans back to the Aryans of Aria (in ancient Media), it seemed an open and shut case, in the light of Babylon the Great (i.e. the Harlot of Revelation 17), to associate the bloodline further to the Babylonians and their neighbors, the Sumerians. This association comes to light in the Guti rulers of Sumeria, who were defeated and replaced by a Sumerian family (Ishtar and Tammuz) worshiping a sun god in the form of a sky dragon!

I was shocked to find that the four empires mentioned in Daniel 2 and 7 were probably ruled by one and the same bloodline, for which reason I started to view it as a God-sanctioned bloodline to rule the earth continually...until Jesus returns, that is. It's as if our Lord said, "Okay, devil, I'm going to grant you power through men over a constantly-evolving global entity, but after that I'll judge you for what you accomplish with that power." I learned that the Greeks were themselves brothers of the Trojans, but I had already learned that Trojans founded the Romans i.e. that the first Caesars proclaimed themselves to be of Trojan blood. Then I learned that Darius, said in the Bible (Daniel 5:30) to be the first ruler of the Persian empire, was the son of an Aryan (Trojans had stemmed from Aryans). What floored me further was that the same bloodline had been a Gogi one, and that it was indistinguishable from the Rus(sian) nation. The coming chapters will expound on these topics.

Plato claimed to have inside information on Atlantis as passed down through his family. As this information included the dating of Atlantis' destruction in roughly 10,000 BC, it seems clear that modern Rosicrucians are tied to Plato's version of the story...and therefore possibly by blood (but if not, then by philosophy) to Plato himself. For, the Rosicrucians also insist that Atlantis existed some 12,000 years ago. Because I am a believer in the literal interpretation of Genesis, I know that Atlantis did not exist 12,000 years ago, and that Plato and friends were feeding humanity a well-calculated falsehood, the only purpose of which was to elevate his/their bloodline to a position of world supremacy. If you have read the previous or subsequent chapters where I show that the dragon bloodline was, in some historical periods, depicted as a wolf-line (from Apollo) and a bee-line, add the following on Plato (not his real name) to your notes: "the ancient Greeks declared him to be the son of Apollo and told how, in his infancy, bees had settled on his lips..." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plato).

It's interesting that Plato's information came ultimately from Egyptian priests not much more than seven or eight years after Ezekiel wrote concerning the destruction of Tyre (598BC) in terms suggesting a falling into the sea. Perhaps the Egyptian wizards caught wind of Ezekiel's words against Tyre.

Plato's story supposedly comes from a "wise" pro-democracy ruler of Athens named, Solon ("of the sun"), who, according to Plutarch, sailed to Egypt in 590 BC and heard the Atlantis story there, and afterward passed it on until, after more than 200 years, it got to the ears and pen of Plato. Tyre, having been the capital of Eastern Atlantis in that Western Atlantis was a development of Tyrians, caused the Egyptian wizards to sport Ezekiel's words as the submerging of Atlantis. When Solon came along, the story may have been the highlight of an event thrown in his honor.

I think Plato was describing Western Europe well enough, in code, as he had heard it from secret-society people(s), but decided to convince his readers that the island/empire no longer existed, except at the bottom of a sea; otherwise half the world would sail to find it for its vast wealth (that Plato described). He then borrowed language from Ezekiel 26 and 27 to tell of that island's sinking. I cannot determine whether the submerging of Tyre is written by God in literal or symbolic form, but compare with the following words of Plato (4th century BC):

"But afterwards there occurred violent earthquakes and floods; and in a single day and night of misfortune all your warlike men in a body sank into the earth, and the island of Atlantis in like manner disappeared in the depths of the sea" (Timaeus).

"For so says the Lord YHWH: 'I shall make [Tyre] a ruined city...when I shall bring the deep upon you and shall cover you with great waters'" (Ezekiel 26:19).

"All [Tyre's] men of war within you, and all your assembly in your midst, shall fall into the heart of the seas, in the day of your ruin. At the sounds of your sailor's cry, the pasture lands will shake" (Ezekiel 27:27-28).

There have been historical reports of small islands falling below sea level due to volcanic disasters, but none of these match in size the perimeters of legendary Atlantis. The story line in too fantastic to be true, as for example when Poseidon had five sets of male twins, consecutively, to form the 10 kings of the empire. To support my contention that Plato was a secret-society man himself, he immediately honors Hephaistos (at the start of his story in Critias), the founder of the Kabeiri cult, the cult that I believe was in charge of Greek-myth writing.

In ancient times and to this day, the religion of the fallen Atlantean bloodline, which fell in the Trojan war, has included the concept of restoring the Atlantean empire to world rule, and in the interim the bloodline is depicted as being locked in the Underworld (e.g. Osiris, Balder) until a certain hero should come to restore it to golden-age status. It wasn't many centuries ago that a leading Rosicrucian, Francis Bacon, wrote "The New Atlantis."

There were multiple new Troys and new Atlantis' in the west as follow-ups to the original in east. I can understand why Plato would locate a new Atlantis at the opposite end of the Mediterranean, for Trojan bloodlines dispersed upon losing the Trojan war and settled upon various Mediterranean coasts south and west of Italy, and even as far as Britain. Greek myth discloses an important westward bloodline as "Hercules"...who is made the early symbol of the Holy-Grail line. Mythology named the Strait of Gibraltar after Hercules. About a thousand years ago, Geoffrey of Monmouth, whom I view as a bloodline member, claimed that Britain was settled and named by a "Brutus," a Trojan from Italy, and that he established proto-London literally as "New Troy."

Based at first only on the similarity of terms, it seems to me that Tyre was the New Troy/Atlantis prior to the westward expansion. I found that Trojans fleeing the Trojan war had settled Tyre, wherefore it seems apparent that Tyre and Troy had been named after the same entity, whatever that entity was. According to historians, Tyre did not become a chief city until after the Trojan war began (in about 1200 BC).

It's curious and seemingly pertinent to this personal theory of mine that an ancient king of Tyre is likened to Satan in Ezekiel 28, while the end-time anti-Christ is also likened to Satan in Isaiah 14. Or, while Satan is depicted in Ezekiel as the ancient ruler of Tyre, he is depicted in Daniel 7 as the ruler of the end-time Roman empire. The Tyre-Rome comparison is again apparent in Ezekiel 27, where the destruction of Tyre is likened particularly to the destruction of Babylon the Great (in Revelation 18). The latter has recently evolved into the European Union and, in our future, is destined to become allied to, and ruled by, Satan/anti-Christ.

I had never before been able to understand the significance of the Biblical similarities between Tyre and the European world rule of the anti-Christ. One could get the impression that God himself is attempting to tell us that Europe became an extension of Tyre (and therefore Troy), and will be an extension of Tyre even at the formation and world-rule of the European Union. If it can be shown that Rome was founded by Trojan peoples of Tyre, then the questions are, do modern Rosicrucians and similar secret societies view the EU as the New Atlantis, and will the "Image of the Beast" denote Atlantis?? The official website of the European Union is called, "Europa," she being a goddess who mated with the chief Trojan line (i.e. Zeus) itself, and moreover she was a princess of Tyre! And the new Euro (the new European currency) logo was fashioned to look like Poseidon's trident, Poseidon being the father not only of Atlantis, but of the Europa bloodline in Tyre! In choosing a design for the Euro,

"The eventual winner was a design allegedly created by a team of four experts who have not, however, been officially named."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euro

Why can't we know who designed the Euro? Would it tie the design too easily to Rosicrucian societies? It has since become known that the current "boss" of the EU, Javier Solana, had a mother who wrote a large book on the author of "New Atlantis," Francis Bacon.

Britannica says that, "The few Trojan survivors included Aeneas, whose descendants continued to rule the Trojans." "Aeneas" should be understood, not as a man, but as an elite Trojan peoples descended from an earlier peoples termed, "Tros." Like refugees commonly do, the losers of the Trojan war sought a new homeland, and after many failures and troubled times, as Roman myth reveals, the Aeneas branch of Trojans stationed themselves in Libya and there they had a love affair with Dido, a princess of Tyre. The historical reality seems to match this picture quite well, for there was an historical queen Elissa, a princess of Tyre, who moved west and founded the city of Carthage, in Libya (814 BC).

Carthage was an extension of the Phoenician empire; the Romans called the people of Carthage, "Poeni," derived from "Phoenikes," and the city grew to become the seat of the Punic empire. The Phoenicians called Carthage, "Qarthadasht," meaning, "New City," a low-key and therefore safe method of signifying "New Tyre," in my opinion. Thus, when the Roman myth writers portrayed Aeneas in a love affair with a princess of Tyre, "Aeneas" must either have been depicting the historical Elissa and her westward wave of Tyrians, or a peoples whom because of common roots in Trojans were able to ally themselves with Elissa's Tyrians. Indeed, note that Virgil, the author of the Aeneas myth, had Dido say, "Trojans and Tyrians will be treated by me without distinction."

The critical thing for all prophecy students to know is that Virgil's myth, aside from the poetic encoding and flowery illustrations, claims as the bottom line that Aeneas was the founder of the Romans. Therefore, Atlantis became new at Tyre, then new again at Carthage, and new again at Rome. Draw a line, therefore, from Tyre to Rome!

In Virgil's myth, we find that, after spending some pleasurable time in Libya with Dido, Aeneas left her hard and cold for Rome, to the point that she killed herself in grief. But this love affair being symbolic for some historical reality that Virgil didn't want to spell out, I would suggest a cold and hard breaking off with Carthage by some Trojans to form a new nation in Italy.

The legendary bird, the Phoenix, is a prime symbol of Rosicrucianism/Freemasonry. It seems to be named after "Phoenix," the king of Tyre (and descendant of Poseidon). Europa was made either the daughter or wife of Phoenix, and therefore she symbolized the same peoples as Phoenix did. It seems obvious that the mythical resurrection of the Phoenix (bird) originally depicted the rising of a New Troy and New Atlantis. While it is difficult to ascertain whether "Europa" depicted the Romans in particular, the possibility certainly exists, for the Phoenix bird was, in Christian centuries, and still is, commonly used to symbolize the resurrection of the Roman empire. Phoenix was assigned (by myth writers) "Cadmus" and "Cilix" as other children (besides Europa), and these too became the possible ancestors of the Romans (but if not, of other European bloodlines similarly rooted in Trojo-Tyrians).

While the New Atlantis, in the writings of sixteenth- and seventeenth-century Rosicrucians, came to refer specifically to America, it must have referred to Europe prior to that, in light of the Europa myth. In this myth, Zeus becomes a white bull that rides Europa away from Phoenicia, to Crete, where this destination became the stepping stone to Europe by way of Troy. It didn't dawn on me until I undertook this chapter that the white bull, "Taurus," is a term evoking "Tyrus."

Britannica says that "The Greeks fabled this constellation [of Taurus] to be the bull which bore Europa across the seas to Crete and was afterward raised to the heavens by Jupiter." The idea that comes to mind is that the people depicted by Jupiter (i.e. probably a version of "Japheth") highly esteemed the establishment of Europe by the Zeus-Europa (i.e. Trojan-Tyre) bloodline.

In my research, Zeus turned out to be associated with a tribe/branch of codeword, "Cecrops," rulers at Athens which sailed over to Crete as the mythical "Curetes." The identification of codeword, "Taurus," as an historical peoples, thus becomes important. Knowing that the bull is Zeus, I know also that Taurus depicted Trojans, yet one can then identify the proto-Trojans, for "Taurus" depicted a pre-Greek and pre-Trojan peoples called codeword, "Gorgons," whom I think were Gogi living in a place called "Taurus," the region of the Crimea near Azov (north shore of the Black sea). One can then connect the bull-line Gorgons to the bull cult of Sin, the Sumerian/Akkadian moon god that was ancestral to Ishtar, the "Great Mother" of the Dragon.

On their mythological voyage to Italy from Crete, the Aeneas Trojans encountered difficulties at sea but were saved by Neptune, who managed to get them to safety into Libya. Rather than being pure fiction, this is true history in code, where "Neptune" is in this case used to depict Atlanteans in Libya, known to historians as Amazons or Amazon kin. "Neptune" looks like the Italian word, "nepoto," meaning "relative/descendant." He, as god of the sea, is easily identified as the god of Atlantis, supported by the known fact that he is the Roman version of Poseidon.

To further connect Atlantis to Troy, we find that Poseidon was said to build the walls of Troy. The first ten kings of Atlantis were said to have been sons of Poseidon, and it was the first son, Atlas, who was the first king. Yet "Atlas" became a region in north Africa, suggesting that north Africa was the New Atlantis at one point, and we do see the Atlas mountains in north-west Africa acting as evidence. Moreover, Carthage was located at the eastern end of the Atlas mountains. When Aeneas is said to have been brought to safety into Libya by Neptune, the sea god is in this case merely a depiction of Aeneas' fellow Trojans who had settled Libya long before his wave of Trojans had arrived.

It is believed by some that the historical "Teresh" peoples were the Biblical Tarshish, and while some identify the latter as inhabitants of Tarsus in Cilicia (south Asia Minor), others identify them as the founders of Tartessus in Spain. Both could be true, but, the point is, the Teresh were Trojans while the Tarshish were, according to the Bible, connected closely with Tyre, thus providing another Troy-to-Tyre tie. Keep in mind that Tarsus was a major city in Cilicia, that region having for its eponym, "Cilix," son of Phoenix!

The Bible calls Tarshish the mother of Tyre, not the other way around. This suggests easily that Trojans at Tarshish came to found Tyre. Trojans and some of their "Greek" cousins were fleeing as the "Sea Peoples," as Egyptians called them. Some invaded Egypt (1188 BC)...some in ships, but others on foot passed through Canaan (where Tyre was located), wherefore we can expect that the Trojans on foot made their new home in Tyre as they passed through. Included in the various groupings of Sea Peoples who invaded Egypt at that time were the "Denyen" and the "Tjeker," according to Ramesses III, who defeated them and wrote about it.

The Denyen have been identified variously, some even suggesting the Danites of Israel. The Tjekers have been traced to the Troad (where Troy was situated) and to the Aegean-sea islands. But when we see "Denyen" and "Tjeker" together, knowing that Dardanus married the daughter of Teucer, suddenly we see a resemblance of terms. Dardanus and Teucer are both regarded as Trojan patriarchs, which is why the Trojans are sometimes called, "Teucrians." I have not been able to decipher whether "Teucer" was codeword for Thrace, the Togarmites, the Tarchon Etruscans, or more than one of these choices, but Togarmah, son of Gomer, seems the best choice judging by the similarity of terms. That is, Troy was (tentatively speaking) founded partly by Togarmites, and partly by the bloodline of Dardanus.

In The Aeneid, Virgil has Dido saying this: "I myself remember Teucer coming to Sidon, exiled from his country’s borders, seeking a new kingdom." I don't find it hard to believe that Virgil knew some true history wherein some Trojans had escaped to Sidon, not far north of Tyre. Yet it's notable that Teucer was not placed exactly in Tyre. I wonder why. Virgil made it appear as though Dido, from Tyre, knew of the Teucrians in Sidon, yet was herself not from Teucrians. It could be that Dido depicted the Tros/Dardanus bloodline rather than Teucer's, for reasons to be explained below.

Aeneas was a descendant of both Dardanus and Teucer and thus probably depicted some of the Sea Peoples that ended up in Phoenicia. The son of Aeneas was made "Ascanius," an apparent codeword for Ashkenaz, brother of Togarmah. But Ascanius was also called "Iulus/Julus," thus tying the Julian bloodline, to which Julius Caesar belonged, to Ascanius Trojans. The third Biblical brother, Riphath (see Genesis 10), has been said to be the root of the term, "Europa" (interesting, but not conclusive in itself).

Now read this historical account:

"The Tjeker are of uncertain origin, but they raided Egypt repeatedly before settling in northern Canaan. They may originally have been the Teucri, a tribe inhabiting northwest Anatolia around Troy."

[italics mine] (http://web.raex.com/~obsidian/gktrib.html).

Sidon rates as northern Canaan. But there's more. In a document dated 1570-1070 BC, there is a story told about a robbery of gold and silver at a shipping port in Dor. The story line is irrelevant; the point is that we find these words in the story: "I arrived at Dor, a Tjeker town" (http://phoenicia.org/wenamun.html).

That's a hunk a hunk of burning proof that the Tjeker (Teucrians) Trojans settled in Canaan, for Dor was a sea port just south of Mount Carmel in what is now northern Israel but what may have then been southern Phoenicia.

[Update May 2006 -- It is my opinion that these Trojans of Dor became the Dorians who soon-after conquered much of Greece and the Aegean sea (i.e. Atlantis) but, upon the decline of Dorian power (a few centuries later), migrated north and evolved into the Scandinavian god, "Thorri" (and possibly "Thor" as well). End Update]

Then there is this account:

"We know from the Amarma [sic] Letters that as Egyptian power declined during the 12th Century BC the King of Tyre appealed repeatedly to Pharaoh for assistance against his rival the King of Sidon. No help was sent and Tyre fell victim to the invasion of the Sea Peoples"

(http://www.robibrad.demon.co.uk/tyre.htm).

The question is, which Sea Peoples in particular did Tyre fall to? In another ancient list of Sea Peoples dated about 1210 BC, where five names appear, one is "Teresh," evoking Tros but referring to the proto-Etruscan peoples called "Tyrseni." How did the Etruscans acquire such a name evoking Tyre so well? The short form for "Teresh" was "Trs," and these letters are apparent in "Etrus" (whether by coincidence or not, I do not know). In any case, Teresh could explain how the major Phoenician city came to be called "Tyrus" in the first place.

The Etruscans were also called, "Tyrrheno," a term originating in the legendary (i.e. depictive) ruler, "Tirreno." Thus, Dido princess of Tyre may have been a proto-Etruscan, suggesting that the mythical co-founder of Troy, Tros, (if indeed this term is synonymous with the Teresh) was the ancestor of the Etruscans. This has importance in that Etruscans are pegged by some historians as the first inhabitants of Rome (the city).

At the following website, a relief is displayed wherein six captives are illustrated. The sixth captive is identified on the relief as "TRS." And here's what the author of the website wrote on this topic (brackets not mine):

"6) a TRS of the sea (in my opinion, a Trojan). If the TRS really is a Trojan, it is strange that he looks like a Phoenician..."

(http://home-3.tiscali.nl/~meester7/engseapeoples.html).

It's not strange if the Teresh settled Phoenicia. I would suggest further that the Teresh went on to become Tyre rulers for quite some time afterward, perhaps bringing forth the historical princess Elissa and other leading Tyrians who created the western Phoenician/Atlantean empire (800ish BC), but also the Aeneas Romans. Previous to the Trojan invasion of Tyre, the city had been called "Surru."

[Update May 2006 -- I'm not yet sure what "Surru" is tied to, but "Asshur" comes to mind, as in the descendants of Dedan (Genesis 25:3), grandson of Abraham and his second wife, Keturah. Was Dedan the same as Dardanus so as to make the Trojans part-Hebrew?? Was "Dido" a depiction of Dedanites?!? The idea that comes to mind is that Dedan-based Trojans moved into Surro, where their Dedanite ancestors had remained and were still living, and inter-marrying with them, they formed the Tyrians that founded a new Tyre/Troy in north Africa. The Phoenician alphabet was Semite and for this reason Phoenicians may have been largely rooted Dedanites of Syria.

That is, were the Trojans non-Israelite Hebrews mixed with Teucer/Togarmite blood, and did they then marry other non-Israelite blood in Surru??? British-Israelists say that "Dardanus" is codeword for Danites...so as to make Trojans part Israelite, but as Trojans pre-date Israel, I discount that theory. There is yet a third option, that Dardanus depicted the Greek Danaans, rooted in the mythical Danaus, this being a good theory in that the mythical Perseus, depicting a major Danaan peoples, was placed by at least one myth at Joppa, not far from Dor. That is, read "Dardanus" as Dor-Danaus. It's yet possible that Danaans were of Dedan. End Update]

The wife of Aeneas was Creusa, and I note that there was an important Creusa associated with the Cecrops family (I'm sure you've noted by now that "Cecrops" evokes "Gog"), she being the daughter of Erechtheus, that latter term evoking "god of Erech/Uruk." Erechtheus was "himself" of the Cecrops bloodline and like Cecrops he portrayed the leadership of Athens. I believe that Erechtheus, alternatively called "Butes," was the root of the Stewart clan who (much later) sat on the Scottish and British thrones (details later). There is a sect of Stewarts who call themselves to this day, the "dragon bloodline."

When Plato told of the Western Atlanteans, he said that they honored "Cecrops, and Erechtheus, and Erichthonius..."

Now because an "H" is routinely inter-changeable with a "C", it is my suspicion that "Creusa" was codeword for the Hros, an important peoples of Caucasia that became the Rus(sians)...but probably started off as the Biblical Rosh, rulers of Lake Van in Armenia. The mother of Aeneas was said to be the goddess, Venus, she being the eponym of the Veneti, wherefore the Veneti were, according to myth writers, related to the Romans.

According to Herodotus, some Illyrians in 1000 BC became the Veneti, but Britannica tells that the Veneti language was most closely aligned to the Etruscan language. Moreover the Veneti became closely associated with the Romans, initially forming a long-standing alliance for centuries. The article goes on to say that Etruscan artwork did not only identify with Phoenicia, but with Crete and, to my great surprise, "the Vannic [i.e. Lake Van] kingdom of Urartu." "Dido" would seem to be the best clue for identifying her people group; the term looks like it may refer to Dodona, a location in north-west Greece that was especially zealous for Zeus. On the other hand, the Taut/Thoth cult also comes to mind. I note that a variation of the latter was "Zehuti," and that it (not to mention "Thoth" itself) look as though it may be the same as "Zeus."

It seems very implied in various myths that the Zeus peoples in Dodona moved north into Illyrium, and then on to become the Veneti, for in fact the Veneti are said to descend from Illyrians. But Cadmus (son of Phoenix) was also said to become the Illyrians, and so he being the same peoples as depicted by Europa, it could start to appear that the Veneti were, in part anyway, Trojo-Phoenicians en route to becoming the Romans. Indeed, it is known that the Veneti language was Etruscan, while it is also known that the Etruscans were related to Phoenicians.

The founding of Rome (probably by another name) from a north-to-south Etruscan migration is to be contrasted with the south-to-north Aeneas take-over of the city. Virgil wrote that the Latin peoples under Aeneas founded Rome while having a military alliance with Etruscans situated north of Rome. Note that the father-in-law of Aeneas was codeword, "Latinus." Greek myth has the Romans and Etruscans together stemming from codeword, "Circe/Kirke." She depicted, not a mountain/island in Italy as others suggest, but Circasia i.e. Caucasia! For, as she was born in Aeaea, while her brother, Aeetes, was ruler of Aea, capital city of Colchis (modern Georgia) in Caucasia, it would seem evident that she depicted Caucasians, even more so since her mother was "Perse" (i.e. codeword for Persians/Parthians, apparently). As Circe was made the mother of Latinus, therefore, the Romans stem from Gorgons of Caucasia/Gogasia.

The Romans/Latins are said to have removed the Etruscans from power (about 500 BC) over the infamous city. But because Aeneas was associated with Tyre, while also the same seems to be true concerning the Etruscans, I tend to equate the two peoples much more than might the typical modern historian. As I began to suspect this equation, I figured that the Etruscans had gone so out of favor politically by Virgil's day that he felt compelled to hush Etruscan involvement in Rome's founding. Then, while pondering the two (mythical) twins said to be responsible for founding Rome, Romulus and Remus, I suspected that one depicted Etruscans (a thought that must have occurred to countless others). Because Romulus kills Remus to rule Rome alone, Remus would depict the out-of-favor Etruscans. Then I found a debate between two men who seem to have extensive knowledge in this area, and I would like to share the following segment:

"I have long thought that Virgil's Aeneas represented the arrival of the Etruscans, but it was politically unacceptable to say so in his day. Also, the linguistic problem of the derivation of Roma (long 'o') from Remus (short 'e') can be resolved through Etruscan, making it likely that Remus was Etruscan and therefore that Rome was founded by the Etruscans"

(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/1917).

If you've read that mythical Romulus was the founder of Rome (753 BC), note that he was said to be a descendant of the Aeneas peoples. According to a "prophecy" in Virgil's The Aeneid (1st century BC), the descendants of Aeneas would come to rule the world forever in a golden age of utopia, and Augustus Caesar is said to be one of the great kings over it. The Aeneid was written just as Augustus had become the Roman emperor so that we see the trickery here: that specifics in the myth were tailored to glorify that emperor. It seems inconceivable to me, therefore, that Augustus would allow The Aeneid to claim his Trojan descent if it were not true.

It should be said that the author of The Aeneid (Virgil) was made the holy guide in Dante's Comedy, and that Dante has been revealed, by his own writings, as a secret Rosicrucian writer. Thus, while Rosicrucians are usually traced back to the Templars at the earliest, they should be traced more than a thousand years earlier to Virgil and his Trojan cult...not forgetting that this cult will rule the world when the anti-Christ comes. This explains why European-Union boss, Javier Solana (surname means "of the sun"), is more than likely a Rosicrucian.

Prior to Augustus, Rome was ruled by the dictator, Julius Caesar. At a nationmaster.com article on the man, we read: "Caesar was born in Rome to a well-known patrician family (gens Julia) which supposedly traced its ancestry to Julus, the son of the Trojan prince Aeneas." Augustus was the grand-nephew of Julius Caesar, and therefore also of the Aeneas bloodline.

This "Trojan" dynasty went on to include the next four emperors after Augustus, up to and including Nero, wherefore Jesus was crucified under one of them...so that this bloodline will reap the punishment due it for crucifying Him. My theory that the seven heads of the Revelation dragon depict seven Roman emperors (Nero being the third) is thereby given some greater merit than the reader may at first have given it.

If a distinction is made between Latins and Etruscans, it seems clear that Virgil and these emperors were of the Latin portion of the dragon-line (this will become interesting when I delve into "Ladon," the dragon of Greek myth that protected the golden apples of a sacred and mysterious garden). Homer wrote that Phrygians stemmed to the Ascania Latins from the father of Ladon, Phorcus: "Ascanius, godlike youth, and Phorcys led; The Phrygians from Ascania's distant land" (thanks to Kathleen for sharing that Homer quote!). In other words, Ascania's distant land was the land depicted by mythical Phorcus, who gave birth to Ladon; these peoples became the Lydians of Phrygia, and finally the Latins. It is my opinion that "Phorcus" depicts Verkana/Hercania, meaning "Wolf Land." Is this why the mythical twins depicting Rome were depicted suckling a she-wolf? Yes, no doubt.

Centuries later, Constantine I, the first "Christian" emperor who wouldn't cease his worship of the pagan sun god, claimed to be descended from Claudius II, while...

"...Claudius [II] may have been descended from the Trojan King Ilus [i.e. Julus] and even from Dardanus, son of Zeus and ancestor of the Trojan royal family, but these suggestions are very likely fabricated to further ennoble Claudius and his putative descendants, the family of Constantine."

(http://www.roman-emperors.org/claudgot.htm)

On the other hand, perhaps the above claim to Trojan ancestry was not a fabrication; perhaps some would suggest a fabrication because they would prefer that we not know the reality. Claudius II, according to Britannica (i.e. not to mythology), was born (214 AD) in Dardania of Illyrium, that location founded by the Dardani tribe of Illyrium, no doubt from Dardanus the co-founder of Troy. It seems obvious also that Illyrium was named after "Ilus," alternative name for Troy.

Thus, with Constantine the Great being a descendant of Trojans, it puts a whole new spin on the nature of the Roman Catholic Church, for Constantine was instrumental in forming that Pagan-Christian cult. He did in historical fact worship Christ Jesus as the Roman sun god! I would go so far as to suggest that the Catholic Church was eventually taken over by the dragon line (i.e. the Rosicrucians), thus explaining how that organization came to mesh/confuse Babylonian gods with the Biblical saints. It also explains the initial alliance that the Vatican had with the Rose-Cross Templars. But these are not sufficient reasons to equate the Vatican with the anti-Christ -- the end-time man -- or with end-time Rome, for there are other dragon-line organizations, namely Europe, and the American-British alliance...which both include the meddling fingers of the Rothschild/Hebrew Illuminati.