A form of Illuminati from Britain, Rosicrucian in type, found its way into high-powered American politics via a band of men who raised Thomas Jefferson and the Democratic Party. Evidence suggests that Scottish secret societies, or, more particularly those in support of Stewart bloodlines, were at work under Jefferson.

The French rulers of the time supported American Independence; the Statue of Liberty was a gift from France intended to be offered exactly one century after 1776 in celebration of Independence. The sculpture was under the authority of Frédéric-Auguste Bartholdi, and he, many websites claim, was a Freemason. No surprise. The French flag is red, white and blue vertical bars; note the French-government symbol. Note too the all-seeing eye on the French Declaration.

Clearly, the Liberty sculpture has nothing to do with the Light of Christ or his freedom from sin, but was no doubt the Great-Mother goddess, probably in the form of Artemis, for Artemis had at times been depicted holding a torch (and a couple of snakes in the other hand). Artemis was an Amazon-warrior goddess, and a symbol of the Hyperboreans, whom I trace to Gogi/Gorgon peoples north of the Black sea. "She" was heavily involved with Thrace, but also Taurus in the Azov region of the Cimmerians, prior to moving into Greece.

Amazons were a type of peoples whose women were stout, tough, and probably engaged very little in attractive appearances. It is well known that Amazons were in north Africa (these were depicted in myth as very hideous to the sight), but I found an amazing thing on one website: that African Amazons, known to historians as "Amazighen," were also called "Tamazighen" as the feminine version. Add to this that the Babylonian version of "Tammuz" was "Dumuzi." Might these terms be rooted in "dame"?

I don't agree with those who portray(ed) Amazons as male-despising, woman-only peoples, as that must be merely mythical code to highlight the leadership roles that women played then...perhaps smacking of the iron-rod, male-despising sector of modern feminism.

My dictionary says that "dame" is from the Latin "domina," and this is interesting since "Sunday" (in Latin) is "Dominica," from "dominus" meaning "ruler/lord." The Latins didn't name Sunday the "Lord's Day" after Jesus, but after their lord, the Sun God, whom in their eyes had dominion" over all the earth. But how did "ruler" stem from a word that means "woman"?? Are we to assume that certain men of certain peoples became wimpy, or so slack as to force women to do their man-work...until the women just up and decided to rule over the lazy bums? Or were Amazons depicted as women because Amazons were the same as the mythical transvestites, the Galli of Kabeiri cult?

The city of Ephesus (in Asia Minor) was founded by Amazons, and as we can find in Acts 19, Artemis was still the main god(dess) of that city when Paul built a church there. In fact, Paul found himself in trouble with worshipers of Artemis, and I can only conclude that God had sent Paul there to do battle with the dragon bloodline, for in his letter to the Ephesians, the apostle wrote that God kept His own secret mystery "in order that, through the Church, the manifold wisdom of God might now [in Paul's day] be made known to the rulers and the authorities in the heavenlies..." (Ephesians 3:10). The Church -- God's "secret society" endowed with true wisdom/illumination -- was moving in on Satan's beastly dominion. And tomorrow's headline: "Fire-breathing dragon slain silly by the charge of an angry Lamb."

The Statue of Liberty holding the torch of illumination has importance to the secret societies that wrought it, in that it represents their heritage, even their peculiar Gogi bloodline. It has occurred to me that Freemasonic concerns in Gogi blood could explain the real reason that the capital "G" is found in the center of some Freemasonic versions of the compass-and-square symbol.

It is known that Freemasonry was in support of the Stewart kings of Britain, and I note that the American Independence movement came just after the Stewarts were no longer on the throne of Britain. The Scottish-based support given to Thomas Jefferson is explained by the fact that the royal Stewart bloodline had sat as kings of Scotland prior to ascending the English throne. Moreover, the Stewart supporters known as "Jacobites," while originating in Scotland, had been in France in the 18th century so that they likely defined the French support for American Independence. It is not likely a coincidence that the French Revolution, similar to the Independence movement in America and coming just one generation later, was supported/led by "Jacobins," not quite "Jacobite," but close enough.

What I'm trying to say is that the royal Stewarts were from Amazonian/Gorgon blood (not necessarily from the African branches), and they secretly knew it! They are conditioned by their elders to believe that their bloodline has right to supreme dominion on earth.

The modern book, "Bloodline of the Holy Grail," is a far-reaching attempt to get the Stewart bloodline back on the throne of Britain, claiming that a certain Michael Stewart is the rightful heir to the throne. I can't ignore that the author of the book, Laurence Gardner (a modern Jacobite), is/was a leader of the so-called "Imperial and Royal Court of the Dragon Sovereignty." Now he claims that the dragon bloodline of which he speaks originated in Sumeria, and that no doubt implies openly that he roots it in Utu, whose throne ended up in Erech where Tammuz and his wife Ishtar (later Artemis) took over.

It is commonly stated by the Gardner types that the bloodline originated as an Aryan species on the planet Mars, but I think this sort of talk is secret-society codeword for the city and region of ancient Mari in Iran, near and adjacent to Aria the ancient origin of the Aryans.

My Zondervan Bible Atlas has "Ashkenaz" written across this region (page 45), evoking the so-called Ashkenazi "Jews" said to derive from Khazaria. Were the Hebrews of Aria and Mari, therefore, those who came to rule Khazaria, whom as rulers would call themselves "Kagans"? Is that the root of the Stewarts, then, whom I now know derived from the Cohen clan, a clan that uses "Kagan" as a sept/variant surname to this day? It's interesting that there was another Mari on the Euphrates river, a major Dagon center, it being a part of what I'll call the "Kabala Strip" leading upstream to Nahorite Haran and nearby Gozan. Note now the current France Coat of Arms, how one could easily mistaken it for Hebrew Torah.

It's a little interesting that the region of Mari is today "Mary," because the marriage between Jesus and Mary Magdalene that these secret societies boast of may be codeword (i.e. rabbit trails/false information merely for public consumption) for the marriage of Mari Aryans to Kabalists. Bloodline of the Holy Grail is not the only book promoting the ridiculous Jesus and Magdalene affair, but it does show that blue-blood Stewarts are a part of that scam, no doubt because it was through royal Stewart supporters that the Anglican Church, the supposed True Church of Jesus Christ with a Stewart ruler on His worldly throne, came to be.

I would say that the "holy grail" refers in truth to the Poseidon-Phoenix family. Note that Phoenix, mythical ruler/representation of Phoenicia, had Cilix (known symbol of Cilicians) as one son, while my dictionary says that "chalice" (i.e. a cup/grail) is rooted in the Latin, "calix." This striking similarity further implies that the Phoenix line was Latin, albeit pre-Roman Latin from the peoples depicted as the dragon, Ladon. The Lydian lion symbol now comes to mind, as the lion symbol of both Rome and Britain. Because the Lydians worshiped Hercules (as did the Romans later), Calix holy-grail blood included the Gorgon peoples depicted by Perseus, rulers of Argos. But they were more-specifically the Gorgophone offspring of Perseus, who are shown by myth to have been in the Joppa region of Israel, in what may have been, or what as a result of the Gorgophones became, Phoenicia. Indeed, it sits right with me that Phoenicians were Gorgophone-branch Gorgons among Canaanites!

My hunch, therefore, is that the proto-Stewarts (and other dragon bloodlines) passed through Cilicia, and then furnished the Perseus Gorgons that branched out to found western Atlanteans.

At one website I found that the true inspiration for Holy-Bloodline books (such as that of Gardner's) has been Nicholas de Vere von Drakenberg (still living), he being the Sovereign Grand Master of the "Imperial and Royal Dragon Court and Order," and author of "The Dragon Legacy." De Vere says,

"From the age of seven onwards my father told me about our ancestry, an ancestry steeped in royal blood and most significantly of all, in what is termed Royal Witchcraft, which is a major, ancient, draconian, druidic facet continuing within the later history of the Dragon tradition and within the Vere family...

"I trace my lineage back in an unbroken bloodline to the imperial prince Milo de Vere, Count of Anjou in 740 A.D., son of Princess Milouziana of the Scythians. She was recorded throughout France as being the Elven, Dragon Princess of the Scottish Picts, and her Grandson, Milo II, derived his Merovingian descent through his father's marital alliance with the imperial house of Charlene...

"In brief, the recorded Dragon lineage starts with the Annunaki [children of Anu, supreme god of Sumeria] and descends through the proto-Scythians, the Sumerians in one branch and the early Egyptians in another; the Phoenicians, the Mittani, back to the Scythians again through marital alliance, along to the "Tuatha de Danann" and the Fir Bolg; down through their Arch-Druidic, Priest-Princely families, to the Royal Picts of Scotland and the high kings of the Horse Lords of Dal Riada; through to the Elven dynasty of Pendragon and Avallon del Acqs, and down to a few pure bred families today...

"Anciently Dragon blood, the blood of the gods, is the true source of divine right kingship. To say that Dragons are the rightful rulers of the world's governments today might raise some contention. Perhaps it would be more realistic to suggest that they may well be the rightful rulers of the world's governments in the future."

(http://www.hiddenmysteries.org/author/devere/kingdom.html)

Don't assume that De Vere is being up front on any matter because he must be devoted much more to his family agenda. It may even be that Milo de Vere (740 AD) was invented (myth style) to depict an historical ruler (or set of rulers) by another name, and I'm guessing Ingelger (about 845-888), for he with his father, Fulk I, are recognized as the first rulers of Anjou.

As Gardner supports the Stewarts for Dragon-bloodline superiority, while De Vere supports the Veres, one can only conclude that the two families were at one time connected by marriage. It is said online that the Veres were from Brittany -- as were the Stewarts -- and that the Veres came over to England with William the Conqueror -- as did the Stewarts.

The Veres became the first Earls of Oxford, and retained the seat for several hundred years (until 1702). The 13th earl of Oxford, a Vere, was the chief of the Red Rose party (i.e. Lancaster) in the war of the Roses, and generally the Veres were hard-core supporters of the Lancaster House.

At the website below it is shown that the De Vere star (now having five points), on the oldest Vere coat of arms, was a six-pointed star in the shape of the hexagram, the very star that was symbol also to the Rothschilds...and quite possibly a symbol common to the Zionist movement of the Templars. Indeed, the son (Aubrey II de Vere) of the first Vere in England was at the First Crusade to "liberate" Jerusalem. (http://www.baronage.co.uk/1999/herart01.html#Anchor-49575)

I'm not saying that the Vere family is necessarily supreme among dragon bloodlines so as to one day produce the False Prophet, but rather I'm showing that there have in fact been dragon bloodlines disguised as Christian entities attempting to set up a false Biblical Millennium with Israel/Jerusalem at it's center. The game is still on. To facilitate this counterfeit agenda, the false idea is being spread that the bloodline originates in Jesus. David Icke says that Jesus was a fictional character, and for other reasons "caution" is the word when reading his wild claims, yet I wouldn't say it any different than he did when he wrote:

"I have most strongly contended in my own books and talks that this claim about the bloodline of 'Jesus' is a diversion from the fact that the 'Holy Grail' or Merovingian bloodline is a key reptilian bloodline from which vast numbers of people in royal, political, economic, religious, and military power today, genetically descend. It is the desire to maintain this reptilian genetic structure which has led to the obsessive interbreeding for aeons to the present day of the 'elite' families.

Sir Laurence [Gardner] himself calls these 'Holy Grail' bloodlines the 'dragon' bloodlines'...

Sir Laurence claims that the dragon bloodline, which he connects to the House of Stewart, has the right to the British throne."

Icke promotes the ridiculous idea that Evolution has produced, in subterranean regions, human-like creatures that are part lizard part human...the offspring of which have come to live in our society not only as working peoples but as those who rule over us with a secret agenda, the Merovingians and Stewarts included. These lizard people are said to shape-shift at times, especially during Satanic rituals, so as to starkly produce reptilian physical features.

But shape-shifting is a concept found in Greek myth, and as both Zeus and Cecrops were among the half human, half snake personalities, it's not difficult to connect the modern dragon bloodline to them. This explains why both the American and French Revolutions were fashioned upon Democracy, for Democracy was, as is well known, founded in Athens by the Cecrops bloodline.

Perhaps those prophecy educators who portray the Europe-based kingdom of the anti-Christ as a coming dictatorship need to re-assess their view and envisage a democratic vein running through their term, "dictatorship." There is no doubt in my mind that certain factions of the dragon bloodline today wish to be dictatorial, but, as it would even now appear, most Illuminatists have learned from recent history that dictatorships won't work anymore without monarchs (they themselves eradicated/weakened monarchs through democracy), meaning that the Globalists are evolving more-clever methods to convince the masses that the Globalist agenda is the best course of action on their behalf. It's called "politics as usual," and the peoples have tolerated it in trust that the leaders have some semblance of angelic wings.

Most people don't realize this, but it is International Law to this day that kings and queens still hold absolute power over politicians. There are those who feel that there is an Illuminati plot to one day use monarchical power (via tight strings attached to them) to effect a Global dictatorship. But I would say that those strings have long been in use under Democratic facades, and that the future tribulation period won't be much different than it is now, except that it will use "emergency measures" in forcing Christians to return to the work-force and other normal posts when one day we decide that we cannot contribute any longer to the global dragon agenda, that decision being the Will of God for us.

It is legal in International Law for a king to sell a country; it has already been done. The Grimaldis bought Monaco centuries ago, for example. This law is no doubt very appreciated and perhaps exploited by super-rich Illuminatists, who may be buying nations under the table, paying monarchs off to do their bidding, as they buy politicians. How do we know that the Rothschilds have not bought Britain from the Royal family? Might not the Illuminati have set up Swiss bank accounts for various of their special purposes, including the concealing of payments to monarchs/politicians?

I suspect that the genes of "sacred" bloodline members are being manipulated by Illuminati lunatics bent on creating creatures found in Greek myths that long ago were fundamental symbols of the dragon bloodline, such as Centaurs, Satyrs, and Dragons. Perhaps the Illuminatists have aspirations of releasing these breeds in coming decades, but to hide the fact that they are products of their gene-altering labs, some Illuminati agents are now attempting to convince the public that the creatures evolved naturally in caves right here on Earth.

De Vere said, "Later the Dragon Court was manifest in the 'Thirteen Covens of Mid-Lothian'..." Midlothian (of Scotland) is the region where we find Roslin Institute, a major player on the world stage for genetic engineering. Dolly the sheep was cloned at Roslin Institute.

Other shape-shifting preachers claim the origin of the dragon bloodline to be on other planets, especially Venus and Mars. My research led me to conclude that the Stewarts were from both Venus and Mars, not the planets, but the historical peoples depicted by those terms; Venus was the Roman version of Artemis.

I don't think it's a coincidence that I (prior to knowing anything of Merovingian roots) had traced the proto-Merovingians to Poland in merely an afternoon of conjecturing, only to discover that very evening that the Merovingians are thought to originate in Pomerania, a region of what would become western Poland. In western Pomerania (Germany) there developed Mecklenburg (today, "Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania") that uses a service flag consisting only of a crowned black bull and a red winged dragon, symbols that evoke the Gorgon bull cult i.e. the Great Mother. Indeed, Nerthus, the Mother named below, was depicted by cows.

It may be totally unrelated, but I'll mention it anyway, that the Pollok clan was early connected to, and to a significant degree became, the Maxwell clan. That is, might "Max(well)" allude to the founders/namers of Mecklenburg since the Maxwells were previously the Maccus clan (once in a while there's going to be a name beginning with "Mac" that doesn't mean "son of"). If Mecklenburg was founded by Polish peoples, then of course one could see how the relatives of Maccus could derive the Pollok name.

A chief city of Mecklenburg is Rostock (see Mecklenburg-Pomerania Coat with the Rostock griffin). Rostock this is precisely where Ptolemy (the astrologer) located some of the Earth-Mother worshipers, mentioned by Tacitus (first century AD) like so:

"After [beyond] the Langobardi come [lived] the Reudigni, Auiones, Angli, Varini, Eudoses, Suarines and Nuithones...There is nothing remarkable about any of these tribes unless it be the common worship of Nerthus, that is Earth Mother." (this quote common on the internet).

As the Veres are said to be Angles, I feel compelled to point out that Tacitus located the Angli side-by-side with the Varni, technically the "Varini." The Varni were in north-western Pomerania, at the mouth of the Warnow river, on the sea shore near modern Rostock. The other Nerthus-based tribes were not far away.

While some websites claim that the Varni were a relatively insignificant peoples, yet, in contradiction, Pliny the Elder divided Germanics into five groups, one being the Varni. There is little online information on the Verni/Werni, but recall that the Vere dragon is a Wyvern species. One website makes this common calculation: "...presumably [the Werni] were clients of the Saxons, the dominant Germanic people of the region in the time specified" (http://www.hostkingdom.net/Teutons.html).

Other websites that mention (very briefly) this list of peoples state flatly that they were Saxon tribes, wherefore I'm prepared to view the Salian Franks as part Saxon (i.e. a Saxon-Veneti mix). Note that an alternative of the above-mentioned "Auions" (technically, "Avions") is "Abions," which may have become the Abii/Ubii Franks on the north end of the Rhine. One could thus reach the conclusion that these Earth-Mother tribes of Saxons as a whole became the Franks, but that may be jumping the gun. The question that lingers is how the Saxons married Veneti to produce the Franks.

The Eudoses tribe (mentioned by Tacitus) might have been the Eduens/Aedui peoples, known founders of the Bibracte capital, in Autun (France). I'm seeking evidence to show that the Bibracte empire stemmed from Bebryces, a Boii nation of Bithynia. Recall that the mythical king Merops (meaning "bee-eater") of Ethiopia was "grandfather" of queen Aedon of Thebes, and that Thebes (capital of Boiotia) was founded by Boii peoples under the codeword/goddess "Melia" (meaning "honey"). What we have here is a Sheba-Edone / Sheba-Getae / Sheba-Goth mix that must have become the Suebi Germanics, for which reason I would expect the Suebi to have a major part in Merovingian genes.

[Update October 2006 -- The Suebi can be connected to the Sabina quite solidly in that the major Sabina tribe was the Samnian, while Tacitus reported that "The oldest and noblest of the Suebi, so it is said, are the Semnones, and the justice of this claim is confirmed by a religious rite...The sacrifice in public of a human victim...They dwell in a hundred country districts and, in virtue of their magnitude, count themselves chief of all the Suebi."
http://www.ourcivilisation.com/smartboard/shop/tacitusc/germany/chap1.htm#Semnones

The implication is that the Sabina also conducted human sacrifices, and for reasons to be given in coming chapters, this was likely Molech worship. End Update]

Geoffrey of Monmouth (author of Arthurian myth), in his code-studded writings, portrayed Anglo-Saxons as a white dragon (supporting the possibility that Saxons, in being connected by blood to the red dragon, were so connected to both the Welsh and Merovingians). It may be that the Saxons were white due to the Goth blood in the Suebi, by which I mean to hypothesize that Saxons stemmed from the Suebi.

The Poles call themselves "Polska," a term said to be derived from "Polanie," the early name of Poland. As you can see, "Poland" should be read as Po-Land rather than Pol-Land, so that the Po river in Italy is evoked. This is agreeable to what Jordanes told us, that the Veneti (who lived at the mouth of the Po) were in proto-Poland as the "Venethi." Having made that connection, one can hardly avoid noticing the similarity between "Polska" and "Bologne", especially as "Polska" derives from the Russian, "Polyi," a term that modifies to "Polgi."

One then has reason to believe that the Polgi were roughly the same peoples as the Bolgs of western Europe. I wouldn't view the one stemming from the other, however, but rather that the Bolgs and Poles were two different branches of Veneti.

Because I have reason to believe that the Polish branch was a proto-Merovingian line, I tend to suspect that the Bolgs also had much to do with putting forth Merovingians. The Polish branch, which more-specifically seems to be ancestral to the Sicambrian Franks, may not have put forth the Salian Franks. That is, the Salians may have been only indirectly related to the Sicambrians as per the Bolgs and Poles not being connected except as two diverging branches of Veneti.

I'm suggesting that both Frank groups were from the Boii who named Bologne, who also became the Poles. The modern Pollock clan, anciently "Pollok," is said to this day to have been a Merovingian peoples. As you must know, Poles are also called "Polocks" (one "l"), yet the Pollock family reports nothing of their origins in Poland, nor from Pollux; these ideas are purely mine, and I include them here as theories that may help to identify the migratory and genetic paths taken by proto-Merovingians.

The first-known Pollok was called a Saxon, and Saxons may have been the peoples who, in mixing with the Venethi, gave birth in proto-Poland to the Wends, known more-popularly as the Vandals (Wends/Vandals are believed by some to have stemmed from Veneti). I suspect that Vandals, or something quite similar, became the Sicambrian Franks. It's interesting that Wends are known to have moved to Texas, and near where I live there are not only many German-built towns, but the town of Castroville that was founded by Alsatians (lived on the French-German border). I have wondered if they were not part of the Wend migration to these parts. As Alsace was populated by Alemanni, it would appear that the earliest-known version of "Alsace," which was "Alesacius," applies to the Alemanni.

How can an historical peoples be named after a mythical god? They're not. Rather, the gods are named after historical peoples, sometimes openly, as in Perseus, at other times to conceal a people group. My conclusion is that there must have been a peoples named "Castorites," or something very similar, for Castroville to have been so named. In a moment, I will tell my theory.

I don't know how closely the Pollok clan, which represented itself with a boar as early as the twelfth century, was genetically connected to the blue-boar Veres. Nor do I know if their boar symbols depicted Frey, the Bolgs, or the Gauls, for all three had used the boar as their symbol. I did conclude that the Picts (ruled by the Veres) were a Bolg peoples (they being from the Gauls), and that Bolgs mixed with Goths to produce the Frey boars, who in turn produced the Saxons. That's a lot of boar peoples, and this may be the reason that families often use three boars to depict themselves on coats of arms. "The Sicambrians, ancestors of the Franks, were known as the "people of the Bear" for their worship of the bear-goddess Arduina."
http://www.crystalinks.com/rennes.html

Arduina was the Gaul boar goddess, yet it does seem that wherever the boar (Old English "bar") goes, the bear (Old English "bera") goes. The Sicambrian half of the Merovingians was therefore a Gaul bloodline, not Germanic (or fully-Germanic, anyway).

The father of Tuisto -- he being a progenitor of all three Germanic tribes mentioned by Tacitus -- was Buri, and his father in turn was Bor, son of Odin. I would connect these to the mythical Boreus of the Haemus valley (Thrace), where lived the Boii.

The Germans "Herminones" were distinguished by Tacitus from the "Ingaevone" branch of Germanics. Germanics as a whole are a puzzling lot, and not simply because they speak funny English. Some were pure Goths (i.e. of Edone stock), others Goths mixed with Gauls/Celts (i.e. of Veneti stock), and still others mixed with non-Gaul Veneti stock (e.g. the Wends...who may have named Windsor). Some Germans recoil at the thought of being half Italian, and would rather not view such groups as Germanics, but blame the old Aryan Gomers living in cold trees who couldn't resist thin-necked and refined senoritas from warm and friendly Mediterranean air.

The Belgae of Belgica (facing Britain) are said to have been Gauls. But it would seem evident that a Bolg-Goth mix produced, or in any case came to define, the Belgae. For, the Belgae were long ago classified more Germanic than Celt. Today, the very-French-sounding city of Bouillon (once in the possession of the first Templar king of Jerusalem) is in Belgium, and the city of Boulogne, now in north-west France, was possibly a part of Belgica when built. I naturally see an early Frank-Belgae connection, but this doesn't necessarily mean that Franks stemmed from Belgae initially.

The Franks are classified as "Istaevone" Germanics, and my personal definition of that term is an Ishtar-worshiping peoples, in contrast with the Hermes-worshiping Herminones. Hermes was an Armenian/Gorgon (i.e. Aryan) entity, and Ishtar an Akkadian/Semite one. The conclusion is that the two had mixed while migrating together, but each retained their own "gods" as per their original bloodlines. This view then places significant Semitic blood in the early Franks, explaining why the first Franks, the Merovingians, pointed to Hebrew origins.

I view the Franks as a Veneti-Goth mix on their Sicambrian side. Though Franks rooted themselves in the Veneti, they could not have been Veneti alone, for the Veneti were not strictly Germanics while the Franks were so classified. The question is, were Franks a branch of Germanics from the Vandals, or Germanics from the Belgae, or both, or neither?

It is said that Germans proper today were from the Suebi, and while some might argue that such were the pure Germanics, I would add a monkey wrench by claiming that the Suebi (and their Longobard and Marcomanni tribes) were to a significant extent Phrygian worshipers of Ishtar as per the Kybele-based Saba(zios)...who were themselves rooted in Abrahamic Sheba. If I am correct in suggesting that an Istaevone Frank is defined as an Ishtar-recalling peoples, it would seem feasible that Franks stemmed from the Suebi.

Istaevones are defined as Rhine-river Germans, and so see on the Gaul map that both the Suebi and Marcomanni are shown off the east bank of the Rhine (river not shown). There is a good possibility that "Ista" refers to the Ister (now the Danube) river, but it's also a good possibility that it was named by Ishtar-worshipping peoples. The river is said to be from the god, Istros, who in turn was a son of Tethys (like "Thoth" = Hermes) the Titan, who (I think) may have depicted a Hermes-Dedan mix. And this is where Castor comes in. Doesn't Castro(ville) evoke "Ister"? There's no use telling me that Istros was a Thracian god while Castor was Spartan, for the Istros Thracians may have moved to Sparta. In fact, I would suggest that Castor and Istros both were recollections of Ishtar, for indeed Leda (mother of Castor) can be cannot logically to Leto (the Lydians), where the Ishtar cult was worshiped as Kybele.

As Merovingians were connected to Redone Gauls in particular, the question is, when did they connect? After the Franks became Merovingians? Or were the Franks formed in the first place by a Redone bloodline? Redones may not have come by way of Venetia, but by sea to the mouth of the Rhodanus/Rhone river. It's made very apparent my Greek myth and historical records that the peoples of Rhodanus mixed with Ligurians, and as the Ligurians lived on the upper Po, they would be easily pegged as the Veneti-rooted Gauls who furnished Frank blood. But the Franks arose long after Ligurians settled the Po, and so Ligurians need to be traced westward and identified by their other names developed over the centuries. I should remind the reader that the Merovingian Rose Line (from Rhodes) was through the Redones, while the Merovingian Holy-Grail line (from mythical Cilix i.e. Cilicia) was through the Ligurians (rooted in Leda of Sparta, who in turn was from the Cati of Cilicia).

A certain Pharamon, king of Gaul, is said to be an ancestor of Clovis, the latter being a prime Merovingian patriarch. It's interesting that Clovis' mythical arms included one with three toads that were "changed upon his conversion to Azure three fleurs-de-lys or" (azure is a blue shade and "or" means "gold").
http://www2.kumc.edu/itc/staff/rknight/Arthur.htm

Does this mean that wherever we see the Fleur de Lis, it is to be viewed as three frogs? My definition of "frogs" as Thracian peoples comes from means independent of the fact that Istaevones were also called "Thracones" and "Strathones" (from "Satyr"?).

The website above also says that "according to French Arthurian legends," Pharamon was "a knight of the Round Table." What's that? Frenchmen in Arthur's roundtable? Hmm, that would connect Merovingians to Brittany/Cambria elements, and my guess is the Redones of Rennes, and/or of Vannes, act as the link. The Fir Bolgs may have co-founded this Rennes (of proto-Brittany, not to be confused with Rennes le Chateau) because, in Ireland, the Bolgs were called "Araine."

I'm suggesting that the Bolgs had been Bologne-based Veneti/Ligurians who founded the Atlantis kingdom that king Arthur came to rule, keeping in mind from a previous chapter that Helen of Troy and her twin sister (Clytemnestra) formed some of those Holy-Grail Atlanteans (Plato's Mneseus' and his twin brother, Autochthon) so that Helen's brother, Pollux, may very well have been the root of the Bolgs. As I believe that "chthon" refers to the Cutha Kabalists, and "Auto" to Atti(s) the sun god of the Kabala cult, the Bolgs would appear quite (non-Israelite) Hebrew indeed.

One can easily deduce that the same who founded Rennes also named the Rhine and Rhone rivers, who, because both those rivers were at first called "Roto/Rodo," were founded by Redone/Ruteni Gauls. The mouth of the Rhine is today Rotterdam. The Fir Bolg, therefore, if indeed "Bolg" denotes the Boii of Bologne, must have been a Boii-Redone mix out of Rennes...i.e. if the Bolg of Britain, the Arain, were the same who named Rennes/Rhine/Rhone. In fact, as the Boii (founders of Bohemia) were previously on the Ister river, and then on the Rhine (see Gaul map), the Belgica Redones (not shown on the map) downstream on the Rhine could translate, not only to a Boii-Redone mix, but to the founding of the Istaevones. The Boii are important here because I am tracing them from Boiotia to Atlantis. It's a very small sail from the mouth of the Rhine, or from the Belgica coast, to Britain.

Nicholas de Vere claims family roots in the Mittani (of Asia Minor). It makes for perfect logic in my mind that the Mittani formed the Hermes-based peoples of Methone, Greece. Moreover, near Bologne sits Modena, and as certain the Gypsies were called "Roma," so Modena is in the province of Romagna. There is thereby a Greek-Danaan connection to Modena of Italy, as I will show below, which then roots the British Danann in Modena as well.

However, it should be safe to suggest that the Greek Danaans settled other parts of northern Italy en route to forming the Danann, and since I have identified the Bolgs as a Danann branch, Bologne seems a Danaan colony as well.

The Danaans are to be distinguished from the Leda Holy-Grail line; since the Danaans were from Rhodes, they represent the Rose Line...that became the Rus and therefore the Ruthene Redones. Are you with me? The Rhodians who sailed and landed at the mouth of the Rhodonus river went straight east to the Po river to mix with Rhodes-based Danaans there, and in the meantime could have mixed with the Boii of Bologne, who, because they were from the bee lines (not to mention the holy-grail line), must have furnished the bee-worshiping Merovingians. I would also stress that the Veneti in proto-France, proto-Brittany and proto-Normandy (i.e. all Gauls) should be considered a Boii-Danaan mix to a significant degree, who in turn mixed with the Redones.

From website below you may see Hermes temples found in pagan Poland with their penis-tops in case you don't believe that those temples depicted such; the Washingtom Monument (and other obelisks) has been disguised with a pyramid-shaped top which, while it originally denoted Poseidon-Egyptian roots, may not in the case of the United States. The obvious fact is that the structures denote a sacred Hermes line which also made it to Poseidon-based Egyptian rulers, and it would seem that the top depicts Danaans (Hercules, for one). For it just so happens that the mythical Egyptus went to live in Methone (Greece). Who was Egyptus? Just the brother of Danaus, the progenitor of the Greek Danaans...and therefore a patriarch of the (Red) Rose line.
http://freepages.history.rootsweb.com/~koby/political/chapter_01/01earlypoland.html.

Hermes, in depicting Armenia, was of Togarmite blood, while Rhodians of the Danaan type were of Cimmerian/Gomarian blood, wherefore we can see why the two could connect, as Togarmah was the son of Gomer. The Rose Line is thus identified as a Cimmerian one. How did the Rose Line get to Poland? The answer could be in the similarity between the "Polanie" region of Poland, and "Bologne," which would then make the Poles a Boii peoples, at least in part.

This may be an advanced read for some, but for others I'm just an amateur. I'm merely setting up the problems here, not answering them fully or at all. Give me time to become an expert at this topic yet.