Previous Update....... Updates Index.......My Post-Trib Book



TRACKING ANTI-CHRISTIAN NEWS

January 6 - 12, 2026

Everyday Heroes
or
News Section Last Section




Hall of Names is once again showing the descriptions of the Coats of Arms presented at House of Names.
Click off (not on) of purple box to get started.



The vatican historically did not-much to aid the Jews in their afflictions. I've enjoyed the video below telling of the plights of European Jews, the background to the founding of Israel by those Jews who had a heart for the Promise of God to Abraham. I suppose that, in God's opinion, such Jews were a good start, even though they rejected Jesus. With these Jews, he could choose a few to become Christians, to evangelize the New Israel.

One can't help but feel sorrow for the plight of religious Jews in European nations, but the down-side is the non-religious Jews who got rich, who would want vengeance one day, who partnered with politicians and royals to seize the taxes of nations such that they gave all Jews a bad name, all over again. The very thing Europeans had feared, that the Jews wanted supremacy over their nations, came true. The speaker in this video ignores these thieving, money-grubbing Jews, and wishes only to portray Zionists as the victims. He mentions the Rothschilds as early Zionist leaders, but does not tell how disgusting they were in greed. This speaker is, probably, a pre-tribulationist geared to portray the military Jews, who won the wars over the Muslims, as a holy people of God collectively:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Er4G5n06MA

In the 41st minute, the cracks in the speaker's discussion come to light glaringly when saying that "the times of the gentiles" came to fulfillment (ended) in 1967. This is nonsense hinting that we are dealing with a violator of prophecy. Clearly, the times of the Gentiles include the 42-month trampling of Jerusalem that is yet to our future. He also offers the typical pre-trib view: that the final generation includes, and begins with, the restoration of Israel in its land. That's not what Jesus said.

Note that the Palestinians sealed their terrible fate when they sought to conquer Jordan in order to seize control of the Jerusalem and Samaria regions with the Jordanian military. Had they not done so, they would probably have had more sympathy from Jordan.

In the 53rd minute, the speaker says that we Christians should "stand with God's people no matter what," by which he means all of Israel. This is where the speaker shows more pre-trib-type violation of prophecy, for prophecy is clear that God will desolate Israel precisely because Israelis are not His people.

Note how "PALESTine" is like "PHILISTia," and then ask why king David, a symbol of Jesus, killed Goliath the Philistine dog. Is it not true that warrior Philistines today are as blasphemous as Goliath was? Who might be the end-time Goliath? Should we expect him at Armageddon? Note that Hamas rules in Gaza, which was downtown Philistia in Old-Testament times.

Upon loading the video above, youtube started to feed me many other videos by the same speaker, but when I loaded a post-trib video yesterday, youtube did not offer even one more post-trib video. Youtube is still censoring content according to how it thinks the world should become.

The time will come when Christ has the authority to censor demonic entities, but the leaders of youtube will not be there, and will have nothing to say about God's censorship of them, or God's aborting them from life, because they abort and censor with liberality, with delight. My hope is in Jesus to rectify this world. The longer He waits, the harsher the penalty upon the rebellious world. The way I see it, eternal punishment is justified when God sees that, if the wicked had eternity to live and rule, they would violate Him all the while, never repenting. For an eternity of rebellion, they get an eternity of torment. Just is just. If they would kill God forever, just is just from God's hand. They have nothing to say on their own behalf.

For anyone needing a re-cap on last week's alibis that turned out to be self-inflicting nothing burgers, here's whoop-whoop Coach Clown:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBDsqhsm7cw

The video above has Baron revealing, apparently, that Candace has a photo of Erika Kirk and Cabot Phillips at Fort Huachuca. Baron's disclosing this as a business move, I figure, because he's trying to become popular on Candace's coat tails. But shouldn't he have refrained from revealing that Candace has a photo from Mitch, if Candace is trying to time the release of the photo for a certain time after Erika and Cabot condemn themselves with "alibis"? Baron alerted the duo, on Monday night, not to try anymore false alibis, and so he might now be in Candace's bad book for a time.

There's no getting rid of the tattoos on the podcasters covering the Kirk saga. Why is this the case? Stew Peters, who wears tattoos, interviewed Mitch Snow on Monday. Stew, another Christian sewer mouth, doesn't like Israel. On the show, Mitch spoke of the photos he gave Candace, which may not have been what she wanted to hear:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdYhqCFxmeM

Enough time has gone by for the people at Fort Huachuca to come to Erika's aid by providing pictures of the real woman that Mitch saw, if indeed it wasn't Erika. But, if such a photo comes out this week, it's too late, because there's been enough time to make the decision to doctor such an image such that the woman does not look like Erika. On the other hand, with Mitch now telling that he may have a photo of Erika, you won't likely see a doctored one because the public is likely to take his story before they take the military's.

Nobody in the military proper, nobody in the Trump government, nobody in Arizona's political sphere, is saying a word about Mitch for fear of blowing the story larger, meaning that even Trump, by now, knows that Mitch's story checks out. The only way to make sense of this silence from the top is if Mitch is part of the psy-op, but such a psy-op is terrible for Turning Point.

I'm assuming that Trump will not come out to rectify Mitch's character because Trump's loyalties lie with the military he plans to use to expand the Empire. The Shadow Government has now evolved out of the shadow, and into the White House. Trump is now the willing and leading stooge of the Shadow Government. What a laughable, naked farce this man is. He's about three steps from his grave, trying to build a world empire in his name. Ego on his face; the yoke's on him. He can't hide it. He won re-election only to expose himself worse than he did in his first four years. The voters who had questions about him in his first four years have now capitulated, no longer viewing him as a swamp-draining angel.

The first I've heard that Mitch goes to church is from Housewife's video above.

How funny is it that, after loading Housewife's video above, youtube gives me only one other of her videos when I re-fresh the youtube homepage, again and again, and same goes for loading Candace's and Baron's videos, yet it's still feeding me a half-dozen or more pro-catholic, Sam-Shamoun videos, days after I loaded a couple of his videos? I can clearly see that youtube is cheating its own customers, denying the money they have a right to make, on behalf of the Shadow Government.

Baron had Ian Carroll on Tuesday night. They got along very well, and Baron kept Ian's mouth clean. The two were disappointing because they still don't entertain a faked killing even though both have now come to the point of denying any bullet of any kind. They both lean exploding mic, but this idea is not viable. Baron has not, to my knowledge, explained why a faked killing cannot be true. Why not? Why doesn't he give reasons? It's important to accept that all of the for-public videos that show Charlie falling over have doctored images. If one can't accept that, there's no getting to the bottom of things because one then needs to explain the necklace, the shirt, and the increased neck size, none of which make any sense either by a bullet or an exploding mic.

Put it this way, that anyone thinking he's so smart as Baron does who, at this point, believes that something under Charlie's shirt entered his neck to kill him, is trapped at a dead end. The only alternative, a faked killing, explains the suspicious but calm behavior of the Turning Point team. It also explains the doctored images that the FBI won't buck against, as well as the faked defence team given to Tyler Robinson, the crisis actor.

Baron is now toying with the idea (I and others considered this several weeks ago) that the team fooled him by making him think he was faking his own death, but in the end, the team killed him by that ruse. That is, Charlie allowed some device to be placed under his shirt with the notion that it would fake his death, but rather than shooting blood out of a squib, for example, the device shot a metal ball into his neck. But if Baron is willing to go this distance, why not cut it short at purely a faked killing, a squib? Why not? A device shooting a metal ball, say 1/4" round, is going to show under the shirt. It would need to be placed on his left chest or left shoulder. The wound looks almost an inch in diameter, not expected to be formed by a 1/4" ball.

Trouble is, Baron is eager to get in good with Candace as part of his becoming a million-dollar podcaster. He lets the audience see that he's gunning to make a lot of money, for those who have eyes to see. He's ruining himself with this aim. He's not willing to go the faked-killing route until Candace does the same. He knows he should have more integrity than this, but he's got a wrong motive ruining his podcasting enterprise. Even if he makes millions, it's not necessarily success. Ask Bongino about that, for he has suffered the evil that goes to those who succeed in big money and big honor. Once you get up to "the top," there are only dragons to schmooze with. It's self-destruction. Ask Trump about that, THE FRAUD. If becoming a deceiver is the mark of success, that's ONE BIG STUPID FOOL. I'm not talking like this because I'm having a grumpy hour. The FART OF THE DEAL is a backfire. Deception and exploitation will have a payback. Blessed are the poor whom the money dragons ignore.

Since writing above, Baron was asked (Tuesday show) about the faked killing for the second time, and finally I've heard his reason for denying it: he's knows too many people who saw him dead, who told him they saw him dead. Achem, there could not have been too many people who saw him, after the tent event, who are not insiders to Turning Point and law enforcement. Baron didn't name those who claimed to see him dead, wherefore Baron is playing his audience. He's dismissing the many in his audience who think Charlie could have faked his death. He's being rude. He gave the last questioner about eight seconds of his time. Baron has a motive, and it's not a good motive, for this attitude.

When Candace was not hitting on Erika, Baron forbade even his audience to hit on Erika. When Candace started to hit on Erika, Baron started to hit on Erika. This is where Baron is at: he wants (motive) in good with Candace, his hoped-for pathway to lickety-split million-dollar podcasting.

Give us one reason that Baron cannot reveal the names and details of the outsiders who claimed they say Charlie's dead body? Why has he kept this news from his audience? Who, baron, who? Where were they when they saw Charlie dead? What day was it? What kind of a shyster withholds such information from the audience he pretends to love? Baron just told me he can't be fully trusted. Thank you.

Nobody but insiders know where the funeral was, if there was one; nobody but insiders know whether he was buried. Charlie was never in a public place after the tent event. Who on the outside could possibly have seen his body? Who and where, Baron?

By denying any bullet at all, Baron and I are required to conclude either that Turning Point killed Charlie by a body device it planted without Charlie's permission, or that Turning Point assisted Charlie in faking his death. The mic on Charlie's shirt can be seen on the shirt after the rifle shot is heard, meaning this mic did not explode. As Baron rejects the staged-killing theory, he's got no choice but to accuse Turning Point of killing Charlie with a device under his shirt. However, I think Baron keeps another theory of a very weak gun, shot from short range, may have caused the neck wound, the big problem being the relatively large size of the wound.

I say that the plotters doctored various videos such that two of them show "bullets" that were not in reality at the event. The purpose is to confuse private investigators with multiple theories so that the people do not gang together on one theory alone, the truth. The inexplicable item that Ian Carroll has found (Tuesday show while joining Baron), coming down from above and toward the ground, could be another doctored item meant to confuse. Ian insists that it plays to an exploding device but definitely not to a bullet. MORE CONFUSION.

Ian came out with this new-found item just as Baron and TriggerSmart were pushing the exploding-mic theory as plausible, and so maybe Ian discovered the item from someone by a tip from a government stooge having the permission, from the plotters, to reveal the item in order to keep alive the theory that Charlie was killed. With us now having little reason to believe in a bullet kill, the plotters, Turning Point, would wish for people to believe that Charlie was killed by some other method. Anything, so long as we don't conclude that Charlie faked his death.

The TP team is highly suspect in something, partly because it has released the claim that the bullet made a 90-degree turn once it hit the neck bone, wherefore part of it ended up in the heart. Nobody but government stooges or the naive is supporting that claim.

Also on Tuesday, Candace revealed that she has the Turning-Point video footage from behind Charlie, which nobody thinks she received in the last couple of months during which time she's been casting shadows over Turning Point. She received it earlier than that, but didn't tell her audience that she has it, which is inexplicable because everybody on Turning Point knew she had it, wherefore there's no reason not to tell the audience. And why did TP give it to her unless they wanted it publicized? Why is a single frame of it being publicized only now?

Instead of releasing the whole video, she released a still image only, which is a thing that plotters do when a stretch of unbroken footage is problematic to them. Why didn't she show this video in the past? Why didn't she tell her people that she had this video? Her audience wants to see Charlie on the ground. Did Turning Point allow the footage granted to her to run long enough to show Charlie on the ground? For how long did TP allow her to see Charlie on the ground? Everyone wants to know whether Turning Point just allowed him to die, or whether Charlie faked his death. She owes the public a good explanation as to why she's not publicizing this footage.

If TP allowed her to see Charlie for three or four seconds only, which would be to the point when he hits the ground, then she should have told her audience that TP denied to let her see the goings-on as Charlie lay on the ground for roughly 15 seconds. This would not be a minor revelation, as it would help to condemn TP. Candace should have told her audience how suspicious it is of TP to not show that footage where three or four men were faking assistance for Charlie.

Candace's every show on this topic has been to make us angry with the killing of her friend. Neither she nor Baron nor Ian has mentioned how revealing it is that McCoy and Neff went straight into the line of rifle fire as soon as they heard the first shot.

Candace promised us that she had a very reliable source to confirm the surgeon's report of what happened to the bullet inside Charlie, but now she's admitting that the surgeon's report was probably not his, but more like a fabrication of Erika Kirk. There cannot be anyone who can confirm a surgeon's report unless that person was with the surgeon as he took the bullet, or a piece of it, out of Charlie. If a person merely hears what the surgeon claims, or sees a bullet in his hand as he walks out of the surgery room to the people waiting out there, that's not reliable confirmation where the surgeon himself is expected to be part of the fakery. Duh.

Coach Clown below deals with these issues I'm talking about, but he does not deal justly with the video image that Candace reveals. Coach Clown does not expound on the suspicious motive for hiding this video from the world. It makes me think that Candace has been foisting a paid psy-op upon us all along, the only purpose of which is to make us believe that Charlie is dead. However, I cannot understand how she could be doing a psy-op on behalf of the plotters, when she's badly defaming Turning Point...unless the psy-op includes a total vindication of TP, in the end.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9PbU2oYQTak

When Colin above shifts the topic to the Ian-Carroll discovery, Ian may be revealing new footage not known before. Note, in the 9th minute, how the camera behind Charlie's head seems way too low because the guy (Terryl Farnsworth, Mormon, I think) who took this camera down needed to stand on Charlie's chair (in order to get it down), but, in the image we now see, the camera looks to be only a few inches above Charlie's head as he's seated on the chair.

This image appears like a con-job, begging whether Ian is part of the con-jobbers whose job is partly to convince the audience that he's opposed to the plotters, partly to provide inside / cutting-edge information, partly to confuse on the method of the murder, partly to make fools of their audiences, and partly to convince us that Charlie is dead. These podcasters, we may theorize, go from staged event to staged event to rake in the podcasting dough on behalf of the plotters who also provide the crisis actors.

Podcasters are told what and what not to reveal at any given time by a think-tank team. For example, if Candace is a part of it, she gets a read-out from the think tank. Her job is merely to act the part while reading to fool her audience. I can't know whether this is what's going on with her, but I'm not the only one keeping an eye on the possibility. I find this theory gravely problematic where she is pounding very hard on Turning Point's reputation. She may have started out as part of a crisis-actor team when with Daily Wire, afterwhich she became (theory) a free radical doing freelance against the team.

Although I disagree with the female speaker in the video below, when she says that Turning Point's objective was to perform a literal coup on Biden, on January 6, I can fathom her claim true that Turning Point was one of the launchers behind the gathering of Pro-Trumpers to the Capitol Building:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ku0L5FkoRuc

The Aquino character in the video above was in my last update as a co-sponsor of military psy-ops. Like I said, one needs to be morally bankrupt to be in that line of work, and just as bad to be an Intelligence operator for the American military. It begs the question: why did Trump appoint John Ratcliffe, who looks like a straight-shooter, to the head of the CIA?

Shortly after the video above begins, there is a loan shown going from TPUSA, an official Foundation (i.e. non-profit), to a registered for-profit company, GGLF, that is itself owned by the CEO of TPUSA. At the time (2023) of this loan ($350,000), GGLF was therefore owned by Charlie Kirk. Note that while Gigi is supposedly his daughter with Erika, we have GGLF.

The loan is reported for the purpose of taking out an insurance policy. I can tell you that, if TPUSA were getting its donations purely from Christians, I would especially deem it pure thievery to use their money for an insurance policy. The policy is not for receiving $350,000 in case someone dies, but rather that's the amount paid to receive a vastly larger amount if someone dies. If Charlie dies, the recipient of the policy is Erika Kirk, but only if she becomes the next CEO. And that's what happened. Therefore, Charlie is exposed as a thief of Turning Point money for simply funnelling money to his for-profit "business," yet he's exposed as a sadistic thief if he then fakes his own death in order to split the insurance proceeds with Erika. I strongly suggest that this policy is only a part of his motives for faking death. I suggest that Israel demanded that he leave Turning Point, and so Charlie chose to fake his death so that he could also leave Erika too without causing two scandals with one bird.

Moreover, Charlie made out an official loan from TP to himself, something he would not want to share with his donors at large. As the founder of TPUSA, he knew he never needed to pay that loan back, wherefore it was in essence a grant. PURE CORRUPTION. If it were not a corrupt thing to do, the insurance policy would have been paid directly by TPUSA, yet, as we can see, the loan was officially paid for by GGLF. And this is not the only problem cited in TPUSA tax records. Candace has no interest in reporting about these matters because she's committed herself to the storyline of angel-angel-angel Charlie, her best friend. Charlie is no angel.

The tax topic resumes in the 21st minute, where we learn that GGLF was "created in Wyoming," a state beside Utah. Wyoming is where Candace said she went when she took a two-week vacation from her podcasting, shortly after Charlie faked his death. The GGLF company was formed in the same year as the loan for the insurance policy.

The plot thickens. The speaker tells that GGLF becomes dissolved by Wyoming, about two years after formation, because Charlie failed to pay a mere $60 in taxes for this company. However, Wyoming had a grace period that can reinstate GGLF if the $60 is paid, and so Erika, we may assume, via a lawyer (Virginia Brown of a Taylor law firm far from Wyoming) reinstated the company shortly (December 3, 2025) after Charlie disappears (probably went to Wyoming). TriggerSmart revealed that Taylor law form was dissolved a few days ago, on January 1, meaning that it can't be sued for money, tending to reveal that it's guilty of money heist. Trump's compromised FBI won't lay charges because Turning Point's people are clearly partnered with his beloved military.

The speaker confuses me when he says that GGLF needs to be reinstated in order for the insurance policy to be good. I don't see why. I don't see any paperwork telling that GGLF owns the policy.

If Candace met Charlie in Wyoming, she's exposed as a lousy charlatan, and we thus see her motive clearly for pushing the Kirk-assassination narrative. If this is the reality, everything anyone has sought to dissect, concerning her storylines, needs to be re-visited for re-analysis. I'm sure that I'd rather puke than do that, but I have the time to be tenacious.

The expectation that Charlie had no commercial business in mind for starting GGLF, and the fact that he allowed the company to slip away, speaks to the corrupt move for which this corporation was formed. If anyone asks Candace about this insurance policy, watch her dismiss it. How many other fake companies were formed to abuse TP donations? Was Candace befriending Charlie because she knew that he was a fountain head of abused cash?

One of the speakers above says that the multi-million payout for the policy went to GGLF, but I disagree. We see paperwork showing that company merely received the loan that was then used for the insurance policy. To know who the beneficiary(s) is/are, one would need to see the policy. The policy is not shown. It would be a scandal if the beneficiary was anyone other than Erika.

The paperwork showing the loan -- paperwork required by the tax office -- tells that the loan was used for an insurance policy, but shows no details of the policy aside from revealing that it was a split-dollar policy, meaning that more then one person/entity paid for it. That is, TPUSA is one entity, but there must have been more money added, aside from the $350,000, by someone else(s). Plus, we are only assuming that the policy involves payments for the death of Charlie in particular. It's logical, but logic is the only evidence we have.

The people in the video above are all speaking erroneously when saying or assuming that the policy has Erika as the beneficiary just because the paperwork we see has the Turning-Point CEO as the owner of GGLF. Bad video in that regard, yet it is good for exposing this loan for a huge insurance policy, good for showing Charlie's true colors, and good for possibly exposing Candace as a charlatan for the way she portrays Charlie.

The insurance policy would have been good whether or not GGLF continued or dissolved, begging the question as to why someone had Charlie's fake company re-instated. The logical reason is that Erika Kirk, and/or the TP Board, was planning to use it again for money laundering. The TP Board may have convinced Charlie to start this company in the first place. Anything is possible for spreading out guilt; while Erika may have been the only official beneficiary, the whole gang may have been under-the-table beneficiaries i.e. when Erika handed them the money under the table. Thus, the whole gang will work for the primary goal of keeping the world convinced that Charlie is dead. If and once that fable is no longer accepted by the bulk of podcasters, a whole new line of podca$ter profit$ will begin flowing, as per the challenge of explaining the assassination fakery. Oh what fun.

Candace's audience might be twice as large if she didn't give the impression, everytime she speaks enamored with Charlie's deepest secrets, that she's telling them what she heard from pillow talk with him, or at breakfast the next morning. In any case, on Wednesday night, she portrayed him as the savior of mankind. Who is she trying to kid?

She and Turning Point may both know that Charlie is still alive. Her motive for not divulging it would of course be that Charlie doesn't want it divulged. To explain why she incessantly attacks Turning Point, even though she may know that Charlie is alive, it can be partly from her grievance against it for taking him away from her while she was working for him, and partly for her animosity toward Netanyahu's government forcing Charlie to step down as the TP CEO. The TP Board can fire the CEO with the law on its side, even if the CEO is the company founder. They must have come to a fake-death deal, the nerve.

This week, Candace was willing to go as far as insinuating that Turning Point appears to be capable of being in the child-trafficking business.

George Webb's last three podcasts, as of Wednesday, have been on Mitch Snow, whom he doesn't trust. On his Wednesday show, he talked about Mitch's Zodiac-killer tweet, which nobody's taking seriously at the moment who supports the Candace side of things. Nobody expects the son of an infamous serial killer to expose himself as such, and then there is the claim, which George rejects, that the tweet was not Mitch's in the first place. The tweet was at the beginning of this past December, after Mitch decided to publicize his sighting of Turning-Point people at Huachuca, and nobody believes that Mitch would put a damning tweet like that out, while half the world is bound to take him for an imposter apart from the tweet.

George Webb is coming off as a government-supporting fake. That is, even while he opposes the deep state in his podcasts, even as he supported Candace's claims, he's now coming off as a deep-state supporter. These contradictions with some podcasters are difficult to explain. Perhaps some of them are just being honest. George attacked Mitch right out of the gate, and while George might be simply suspicious of him, why can't George fathom that the deep state can be expected to plant a fake tweet on Mitch's behalf to discredit his Huachuca claims?

Instead of going the route that George is, to seek reasons for mistrusting Mitch, Candace is tentatively assuming that Mitch's claims are correct while placing the onus on Erika, Harpole and Phillips to prove alibis for themselves. As George knew by Wednesday that the alibis of all three are suspiciously insufficient and/or looking like desperation, why is he trying to establish a Mitch-zodiac narrative? Perhaps the jobs of some wolf-in-sheep-cloth podcasters is to guard against vital government truths by hijacking the theories of other podcasters seeking those truths. It makes sense that the government would have many such chameleon podcasters whose additional job is also to fake being truther podcasters. But if George is one of these, why does he have such a low number of views when youtube could easily increase those views artificially at the request of the military? Perhaps the military has become very shy in trying to leverage the tech giants for fear of getting caught again doing exactly that.

Speaking of hijacks, many are portraying Erika as a military-sponsored hijacker of Turning Point. It appears to be a correct assessment.

To be clear, I don't like what I see of Candace Owens on her show. I don't like the way she sounds like a child at times, I don't like her catholic evangelism, I don't like her podcasting style or the love-herself podcasting opening, I don't like her wearing 365 outfits per year; I wouldn't want a wife like that, what's Farmer's problem that he's afraid to chew her out for it? Why isn't she Candace Farmer? You a pushover, George? She's maybe too independent for a modern-day Westerner-husband to chew out, and she's not at all portraying herself as a modest, traditional wife even while claiming to be a Christian. She gives signs that she would like to be adored as a sexy model even while she's married. PUKE.

George, do something about your wife, and tell her to stop using childish-like emphasis at the end of wordzeh, it drivezes me nutzeh. I'm not watching her Thursday show because she has a nasty F-bomb on her video cover, to be expected from merely an up-to-date, modernist "Christian." If she were truly carrying the cross of Jesus, she wouldn't do that. It sets a terrible example for other Christians, and Lord forbid that we all spew sewage from our mouths when we can easily avoid it in video presentations. Lord forgive us and correct us for our bad habits as we trudge through end-time Sodom. Let's recognize the difference between the worldliness that rubs off on us versus the purity of heart that You desire to create in us, with our own help of course. Without you, we are sewage, let's get as far away from it as possible, and let's not get it on others whom we talk to.

The only reason I can get through her shows, until the superchats, anyway, is that she doesn't always talk like a teen. That is, she does and can talk like a woman, but she reverts at times to the annoying lingo; it must have a name by now but I don't know it. Here's a news-covering podcaster unafraid to speak the Jesus-cross:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vMtabY9uXMI

The video producer above didn't need to mention the "balls" of Tyler Bowyer in the video below. But he did, something the Apostles would not do. It's an example of how young Christians today are sliding down the slippery slope of sewage with their mouths wide open. He does a short presentation on Candace's Thursday show on Romanian Angels, and I think the American military loves to see this aired because it flaunts its wickedness these days, because nobody can do anything about it when it has presidents of both political parties in its pocket. Trump's not going to do anything about it, and he could very well have known about Romanian orphanages long before 2025:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDuWtThaRVw

Why is it that another Candace supporter, Jackson Hinkle, uses f-bombs needlessly? Why is it that Candace pits herself amongst this patchwork of podcasters who seem to have an agenda to urge Christians to use normalized gutter language? Even Tucker joins in from time to time.

Candace uses two cameras back-and-forth. She doesn't usually look into either one when she's reading her script, and she uses all sorts of facial expressions and hand motions to hide that she's not reading, trying to come off natural. That's called acting. She's got money enough to have someone else(s) write her scripts. She could be more a fraud than genuine. Yet her audience raves about her because she comes off genuine, or at least consistent in honesty. I do detect in her some good moral bones, but maybe I'm just being fooled by the script writers. They come a dime a dozen for politicians. I'd know better if I knew the person(s) who writes her shows. There's nothing wrong with writing and reading your own script for a video presentation, if it's all done with good motives and in honesty.

If she and Charlie were sleeping together when they travelled together, it can explain why Candace complained this week that Charlie couldn't go anywhere without security. It sounds like she'd need to wait until the security guys were alone in their rooms at night for her to slip into Charlie's room quietly, then leave before the men awoke. If, that is, they were sleeping together. The pictures she presents of she and Charlie attest to how budsie the two were together. I don't know why she presents these photos only to raise suspicions, perhaps to advance her reputation, which goes further the more angelic and profound she portrays the dastardly, hypocritical Charlie. I'm not waiting for her to do a segment on his insurance policy. She's not that honest, apparently, and she took until now to do something on Romanian Angels.

If you're an evangelic-type Christian smart enough to reject prosperity, money-grubbing, evangelical preachers, you probably figured out that the vatican is the natural enemy of Turning Point just because the vatican historically called catholics to join the Democrat party, because Protestant Christians started to gather in the Republican party to fight the anti-Christ spirit in the Democrat party. And that's the kicker, the vatican, if it were truly loyal to Jesus, should have been calling catholics out of the Democrat party. Instead, a bloc of common but Bible-based catholic voters was needed to successfully urge some catholics out of the Democrat party. There is likely a concerted catholic effort to mow Turning Point down in a knee-jerk reaction to the Kirk shooting, though podcasters won't advertise the motive.

On Baron Coleman's Thursday show, he shows Rick Cutler, the "palm-gun guy," in a photo where the caption tells that he has a "ministry" in assisting victims of pedophilia. Wow, a new find, and it seems as though Candace and Baron (both in Tennessee) are coordinated on their pedophilia topics for this same evening. It appears, right off the bat, that Rick Cutler is a pedophile or pimp thereof.

Baron discovered (Thursday show) that Rick Cutler, Butch Hibbs, and Brian Harpole were at Fairy lake, Montana, on October 6, less than a month after the Kirk-shooting event. Baron rightly thinks that this meeting is suspicious because Butch is not supposed to be a Turning Point character, and, moreover Rick Cutler doesn't look like he's been a Turning-Point character in particular. Maybe someone should check the bottom of Fairy lake for the bones of children. Baron said that Cutler was at Fairy lake due to a meeting nearby on October 8, but I didn't catch what this meeting was about. It seemed to me that he wasn't going to tell us about this meeting on the 8th until someone in his audience mentioned it. ??? Had he not told us about this meeting, we would have been left in the dark as to why the three above gathered at Fairy lake.

Also on Thursday, Baron showed a clip of Anna Paulina Luna (Florida congresswoman) "accidentally" saying that Erika "lost" both Charlie and her kids. Are they from an orphanage? Are they at the bottom of Fairy lake? Am I being too cruel?

Baron (Thursday) demanded from Candace to see the full video from Charlie's backside. Good call, Baron. But, when a viewer sent him a message with "holy crap," he read it, though a Christian should not say that phrase, and should tell his audience why it should not be used. "Crap" alone is acceptable. Being a lukewarm hypocrite is not a good call, Baron. Either stand up for your God without fear of losing money or offending people on your own show, or don't call yourself a Christian. Maybe you could do your shows when the kids are not home so that the kids can be with you nights. Ya, you won't make much money on an afternoon live, ya true. I guess the money is more important than your kids being with you, four nights per week, every week. Ya, I know, you wanna be a million-dollar podcaster.

Maybe you could go into the confessional each Sunday to make atonement, tell your priest about it, ask him to send the message up for you. The vatican once taught that the common people don't have a direct line up to God. Are you sure you want to bring people into a vatican church? Really sure? Do you like gambling with God? Imagine the poor slob who begs for a priest to come by his side on his death bed, who was never taught to pray directly to God. Who should we blame for this disaster repeated millions of times century after century? Imagine the idiot who pays money to the priest in order to get a better chance of entering Heaven. Who do you think made that idiot an idiot?

I have my own logs for to remove from my eyes, but the reason I'm using Baron or Candace as my bone-picking instruments is that they want to be vatican evangelists, and because they give me opportunities to show how lackluster catholics are in their devotion to Jesus. Baron doesn't use profanity, good one Baron. Baron plays innocent, good one. But Baron told his audience he didn't want to make any money in podcasting, because he likes doing it, and he then jumped off the cliff into the superchat pool and never looked back. He realized how much easy money there is to be had, and so he quit his daytime job to learn better how to stroke his audience just right to maximize their gifts. It's a lot easier than struggling over complicated legalities in the lawyer business, and he can keep his pajamas on until 6 pm show time if his wife lets him.

Candace discovered this week, though only according to a "tip" from an undisclosed person, that Charlie Kirk had an appointment to speak at a Bible college in Woodland, Colorado, the day after the shooting event. She claimed that there was no security planned for the event, making sense because Turning Point knew they were going to fake Charlie's death. Apparently, Turning Point was hoping that nobody on the outside would discover this Colorado event.


Everyday Heroes

It's easy to see when google is trying to hide things. When seeking "everyday heroes romanian angels," google won't bring up "Everyday Heroes" to the top of the search. I need to put the phrase in quotation marks in order to get it to come up. Plus, google brings articles up defending Erika Kirk on this matter of Romania, showing that, even though google is a natural enemy of Turning Point, it's protecting the military, not Erika, by hiding the materials raising suspicions on this topic.

I've got reason to believe that God set up the Hero surname as a pointer to Romanian Angels because the latter is said to have obtained Ukrainian children in neighboring Romania. I'll first tell a short history of what I think are pertinent events in my life that point to this thing. I went to visit Lawrence Kepke at Scarborough Town Center, Toronto, when he got a shoe sales job. We were both 18. It was only while visiting him that I decided to go to the top floor, to find a shoe store there, to ask if it was hiring. The manager, who turned out to be a coke addict, hired me on the spot because I convinced him I could do a good job. But, to be honest, I was too honest to be a good salesman. I didn't like telling customers that their shoes looked great on them if they asked for my opinion, just to get the sale. I let them make up their own mind. Kepke was more aggressive.

You can click Hero's now, which loads them on another tab in order to load other surnames, to better follow the heraldic links.

As Kepke's father is Ukrainian, and as Trypillians lived in proto-Ukraine, I've noted that German Trips use shoes. It's the first clue that God set Kepke and I, at age 18, to sell shoes for making pointers to things in Ukraine. Kepke and I would have lunch regularly. A few weeks after getting the job, I saw him walking by my store with Chris Peare. I hadn't yet met her. He and she ended up together for a couple of years, and I reluctantly got together with Louise Phillips, Peare's friend, a big mistake. I've shown over recent updates how Louise especially points to Erika Kirk, and more-recently to Erika's date, Cabot Phillips. This is where Kepke's Ukrainian blood comes in, right?

Prior to getting the shoe-sales job, Mary Nigro, an Italian that I assume was born Maria, became a friend (we had no physical contact), and she lived in Buttonville. It's amazing that Buttons list Budins, because Budini lived in the Ukraine. It explains why I saw German Trips using boots before showing shoes, as code for Budini elements. I assume the Boot surname is from the Budini.

Mary worked for Knob Hill Farms grocers, and she suggested I apply there. After I got the job, I suggested to Kepke that he apply there, and he got the job. Some two or three months after we left there, we got the show sales jobs. But while still working for the grocery store, I threw a party at my place when my parents went away for the weekend, and Kepke slept in the basement that night alone with Mary. I don't know what happened, but I assume that God set it up because Keeps are from princess Maria of Kiev, the Ukraine capital. Maria became the queen of Poland.

The GROCEry store can point to Carrick-branch Groce's/Greggs who share the horizontally-split Shields of English Lane's/Lawns and of Italian Romania's/Romans. Lane's/Lawns share "Garde" in their motto with Carricks, and the three horizontally-split Shields above are the Ukraine flag in colors reversed. Erika's mother is Lori Lane, and she married Mr. FRANTzve. Groce's/Greggs are first known in Baden, and the Arms of Baden share the Lorraine bend because Lorraine's are from Maria of Kiev. Badens/Battins are first known in Somerset with early Frants/Friends and English Days, and while the latter look related to English Lane's/Lawns, they almost incorporate the Ukraine flag.

The Veringers of Baden can be gleaned from the Varangians of Kiev because Polish Casimirs have the Arms of Baden as a red antler, and because Veringers of Baden used three red antlers. Casimir of Poland was the son of Richeza of Lorraine. Princess Maria was from the Varangian Rus of Kiev, explaining why Marys have the Ross Coat in colors reversed. Now we know why God put me together with Maria Nigro of Knob Hill grocers.

I think that Rus were from a Hros peoples of Ukraine, and so I now go to the Hros-like Hero/Heros surname, listed with Harrobins, and first known in Derbyshire with Ayer-branch Airs/Eyers and Here's/Heyers. Ayers are first known in Ayrshire with Hare's/Hairs and Budini-like Boyds (Ayrshire with Carricks).

If Hero's can be traced to Ukraine, then we can have another pointer to Romanian Angels where Everyday Heroes Like You was related to it via Erika's family, especially her mother, Lori LANE. We can even see similarity in English Lane's to one Day Coat, while Irish Lane's share the bend of Kiev-liners, Keeps and Lorraine's. EveryDAY Heroes.

I'll now take the first name of Louise Phillips to Luis of Kiev-like Ceva, in Piedmont with the first-known, Peare-like Pero's/PERICHs. The Buttons/Budins to which Maria Nigro pointed with her Buttonville home are first known in Hampshire with the Botters/Bodens whose eagle is on a "PERCH." Christine Peare brought Louise Phillips into my life. Pierro's/Pero's/Perichs, with Rus-pointable roses, are in the near-format of, and colors reversed from, Everys. EVERYday Heroes. While Evers/Eure's are linkable to both Vere surnames, Everys/Averys are in Vere/Vair colors, and Vere's ruled Oxfordshire, where Peare's/Pearls and Hare-branch Harcourts are first known.

Next, we go to the giant ostRICH of Luis', for Osts/Hosts are first known near the first-known Rich's/RICHESS' of Hampshire, where Buttons/BOTTONs/Budins are first known while Rich's/Richess' use bottony crosses. RICHEZA of Lori-like Lorraine province was the mother-in-law of Maria of Kiev, explaining why Keeps share the bend of Lorraine's and Irish Lane's. English Lane's almost have the full, three-word motto of Richs'/Richess', and the latter are in the colors and near-format of Everys/Averys. Lori Lane is Erika's mother, and Lorrys (share "laurel" with Lorraine's) are listed with Larrys while Lawrence Kepke is also Larry Kepke. Everys/Averys are moreover in the colors and format of Gore's, first known in Kent with their kin, the English Trips. Lori Lane Frantzve is pointing heavily to Ukraine's Rus royals.

I'll even add that the Harborough's in the Shirt write-up are suspect with the Harcourts because the latter share the peaCOCK in Crest with Shirts. The latter have a "HOSTis" motto term while Hosts are listed with OSTrich-connectable Osts (Somerset with Cocks). Luis' have a giant ostrich in the colors and format of the Kepke goat, and we have another white ostrich with of Coke's, first known in Derbyshire with Hero's! See that? German Osts, with the Keep bend in colors reversed, are first known in Saxony with Kepke's. The Coke's, sharing the Lorraine eagle, recalls that my shoe manager was a coke addict.

So, as the Luis ostrich gets us to Maria-of-Kiev elements, it seems that her line named Ceva, location of Luis, mother of Alice of Saluzzo, wife in turn of the Arundels, which can explain why Keeps are first known in Sussex with Arundels. We then go to the Spanish Marina's, first known in Castile with Spanish Maria's while Italian Maria's almost have the Coat of Italian Marina's. Marine's are first known in Hampshire with Rich's/Richess' (named a location in Lorraine), and their Marines'/Mariner branch are first known in Kent with English Trips.

Then, German Trips (shoes) are first known in Hamburg with the German Drummonds having the Spanish Marina Coat in colors reversed, both of which are almost the Coats of Hero's and Cavetts/Cheve's! Ceva is at the Cevetta river, and Cavetts/Cheve's are excellent because they are first known in Picardy with Frantzve-connectable France's sharing the Frame Coat, with the lion of Frane's in colors reversed while Friens are listed with Frants/Friends. I'll add that Drummonds descend almost directly from king Andrew I of Hungary, who got his Varangian-Rus wife in Kiev. Orem-connectable Orions (Norfolk with Marys) almost have the Marine and Marines/Mariner Coat.

The Marina's and Marine's are excellent here as per the following from google AI: "The phrase 'Everyday Heroes' refers to a non-profit organization that launched a project called 'Romanian Angels,' which involved teaming up with the U.S. MARINE Corps to support an orphanage in CONSTANTa, Romania." While Marys have the Ross Coat in colors reversed, Rose's (near Ross-shire) use a "CONSTANT" motto term. The same Scottish Rose's also love (in their motto) the True variation of Shoe-beloved Tree's. The latter share a "knight" with True's/Tree's while Knightons (Worcestershire with Here-beloved Wings) almost have the Hero Coat too.

English Hare's/Hairs are first known in Surrey with the Lamberts while Mieszko II Lambert (husband of Richeza of Lorraine) was the father-in-law of Maria of Kiev. The Lum variation of Lambs (share lamb with Lamberts) are in the motto of Stevensons, first known in Northumberland with Lorraine's, Lums/Lambs and Baileys, and then English Stevensons are first known in Essex with Every-branch Vere's and lamb-using Pascals. Baileys share the brown boar head with Rabins, and Hero's are listed with HorRABINs.

Rabins are first known in Dorset with Cave-branch Caens, and Cave's are in Cavett/Cheve colors. Dorset is also where Phillips-connectable Palins are first known, as well as Bushers. Candace Owens mentioned Otto Busher, accused of child trafficking in Romania, and pal of Erika Frantzve's family. Bushers go well with Rabins because the latter share the three black boars of English Bush's while German Bush's/Bushers, with the giant fleur of Erika-like Eriks in colors reversed, are first known in Rhineland with Frans'/Frantz's. Frants/Friends were previously first known in Somerset, beside English Bushers.

The "sea dragon" of English Bussys now comes into play because Sea's share the triple-wavy fesses of German Drummonds. Sea's are first known in Kent with Drummond-connectable Trips.

Moreover, Rabins (share raven with German Rothes') are said to have been related with "Des bois" while Scottish Bois' are said to be a branch of Bosco's in turn in the Scottish Rose write-up. German Rose's are first known in Silesia with KIRKners.

Scottish Bois'/BOASTs are excellent for having this: " The De Bois-HERBERT family were barons of Halberton, Devon c. 1050." Devon is where Wearings and Tuft-connectable Were's/Wears are first known. Bosco's have "TUFTs of GRASS." Wearings share the checks of Rabins! English HERberts/HerBUTTs are excellent for being in the format of, and colors reversed from, Coke's, first known in Derbyshire with HERo's/HerRABINs!!! Beauty.

BUSTards (version of Bush Coat) have pellets but call then "aGRESSes," and Gress's/Grasse's are first known in Provence with Grace's/Grasse's. Bush's are first known in Yorkshire with Traby-beloved Scarfs, and Trip-like Trapps use a "bustard." Agress-like Agers/Augers share the giant lion of Orphans, the latter first known in Norfolk with grasshopper-using Greshams/Grishams and Fieschi-branch Fiscs. The split-Orphan Shield looks related to Fauci's while Fauchy's have a giant grasshopper. Fauci's are first known in Genova with Fieschi (see Wikipedia). Trapps are first known in Austria with Scarf-like German Scherfs/Schere's, and with the Austrian Schere's that use a Busher-connectable "stick." I trace Sticks to the Astikas who married the Traby family of Poland.

Tufts and Were's/Wears share the crosslet of German Angels who in turn share the quadrants of Aarons/Arens while FitzAlan of Arundel, son-in-law of Luis of Ceva, was of Arun. Orions/Irons of Airaines can play here, for Baileys and their Baliol branch were from beside Airaines, a location in Picardy, where Cavetts/Cheve's are first known. Baileys share the brown boar head of Rabins and Belly-connectable Innis'.

My shoe-store manager was a coke addict, and so cocaine might be part of Everyday Heroes along with OTTO Busher's child trafficking. Cocaine's share the red rooster of BabCOCks and Cocks (Somerset, beside Bushers). Babcocks are first known in Worcestershire with Airs/Eyers and Bosco-connectable Heyers. Otto's/Ottone's and Grass-like Grazi's are first known in Perugia, and Italian Marina's have: "The surname Marina was first found in Orvieto, a small city which lies southwest of PERUGIA, where Ugolino Marini was consul for the town in 1068." Grazi's share the "pomegranate" with French Crispins, first known in Lorraine, and English Crispins, beauty, have the Hero/Herrabin Coat in red!

On Thursday, I think, Patriot Housewife revealed a hidden page where Erika Frantzve shows her regret for doing cocaine in her past.

Ahh, Kepke's are also Kopke's and share the border of Koops/Kupe's. The latter's "candlesticks" are good for the Sticks, first known beside Bushers and in their colors and format. Candle's/Cantwells are first known in Suffolk with the Babe's (almost have the Beak and Bussy bars), and with the Kidds (looks like a pointer to the orphanage alone with Babe's) sharing the Kepke goat. The Goat-like Goods/Guts share the Stick Coat, and while Sticks were previously first known in Dorset with Bushers and Lorraine-related Beaks (Lorraine's and Perins use beakless eagles), Beaks essentially share the English Bussy Coat while Sticks are in Busher colors and format!!! French Bussys/Bussers share the Lorraine and CHILD eagles! I'm not very familiar with the French Bussys/Bussers, shame on me, for I've mentioned the bus stop of Lorraine, my date in my 20s, a million times! Childs are first known in Hertfordshire with Beak-like Beach's/Bechs who share the vair Shield of GRASleys/Gresley.

Repeat from above: "The "sea dragon" of English Bussys now comes into play because Sea's share the triple-wavy fesses of German Drummonds." Sea-branch Seamans are first known in Suffolk with Babe's, and I'll add that Childrens are first known in Kent with Sea's, Dragons/Drainers, Marines'/Mariners, and Trip-related Gore's while Gorsuch's share the Lorraine bend-with-eagles, which are Busser eagles too. Marines'/Mariners are in Busser colors. Gorsuch's are first known in Lancashire with Forts, and with Suchs'/CHUCKs of Orem-like ORMsKIRK, who were in the last update as a pointer to Fort HuaCHuCa.

Marine's are first known in Hampshire with Dragon-loving Drake's expected from count Dracula of Romania, for the warlock, Nicholas de Vere von Drakenberg traced his witchy-Vere ancestry to Transylvania (now Romania). Count Dracula was in the Wallachia part of Romania, and while Walkers are first known in Yorkshire with Mason-connectable Darnells, Drains and Bush's, Walch's/Walsh's are first known in Roxburghshire with Vere's/Weirs and Scottish Scotts (Children colors and format). English Scotts are first known in Kent with Children, Dragons/Drainers and Masons. Romanian Angels of Constantia is near the southern Wallachia border, and while German Dragons/Darno's (share red wyvern with Drake's) are first known in Silesia with German Rose's, Scottish Rose's have a "Constant" motto term. Constantia was in the theater of the Roxolani of the Buzau and Ialomita rivers, and they named Roxburgh. The first president Bush was a Walker too, and while Scottish Rose's loved Bosco's, German Walkers use the rose. Dragons/Darno's share the red and giant wyvern with Drake's, which is in other colors with Italian Arnolds, and Lorraine's bus stop was at the corner of Yonge and Arnold while Yonge's share the Coat of German Rose's (Lorraine-like Lorne avenue was across this intersection from Arnold). German Arnolds share the Bird/Burd flory cross, and Children use "birds."

In this context, the Scotts can be a pointer to Scottsdale (beside Phoenix), where Erika's and her family live(d). Scottsdale is in MARicopa county, and French Mars/Mere's are also MORE's while Scottish Scotts, with an "Amo" motto, share the Coat of Scottish Terras' having an "Amore" motto. See that? God may have provided a MARICopa pointer from the Maurice's because they share the France lion. Meriks share the Scott star and add a sea horse, a Seaman symbol too. Seamans are first known in Suffolk with the Kopke-connectable Kidds and the Koop-connectable Candle's. MariCOPa.

Plus, Suffolk is where Winfields are first known looking related to the Lorraine bend-with-eagles, and Scottsdale was named after Winfield Scott. Instead of the eagles, Winfields use wings while Wings/Winks share the lone pile of Hagels while Eagle's are also Hegels (Lincolnshire with Blacks). Winks/Winks ("blackaMOOR's heads") love the Billets who in turn share the Bus cinquefoil. Lorraine's share the eagles of Childs, first known in Hertfordshire with Wink-like Vince's/Finch's. Finchems and English Bussys almost have the Coat of Lorraine-beloved Beaks (Dorset with ChafFINCH's). WINfields remind of the Winns/Wine's, who almost have the French Busser/Bussy Coat (share Child eagle too) in other colors. Bussers/Bussys are even first known in Normandy with Mars/Mere's/More's and French Herberts who in turn share the Scott and Constant star. That looks like a definite pointer to Otto Busher. As I've said many times, Lorraine took the bus each workday to the Finch subway station in Toronto.

Wings/Winks are first known in Worcestershire with the Rooks in the Coat of German Terras' while Scottish Terras' (MORay) share the Scottish Scott Coat (share Bright star). English Terrys (Kent with English Scotts), looking like kin of Birds/Burds (Cheshire with Brights and Billet-branch Bellows), share Phoenix martlets. Looks like we're pointing to Scottsdale. Terrys almost have the Bird/Burd cross, and so as the bus stop was at Yonge and Arnold (Richmond Hill, Ontario), let's repeat from above: "German Arnolds share the Bird/Burd FLORY cross." Billets are first known in Devon with Berts who in turn share the Coat of Burts (Norfolk with Bus').

Terrys look like they share the brown Crest of Browns ("FLOReat") who in turn share the fleur-de-lys of flory-like Flore's and Flora's. Tarrs and Tarent-like Trents are first known in Somerset (beside English Bushers) with the Severs sharing the Frans/FRANTZ annulets, and with Florys/Fleurys sharing the fleur-de-lys of German Bush's/Bushers, the latter first known in Rhineland with Frans'/Frantz's!!! Zikers, I didn't expect this when starting the paragraph. Frans'/Frantz's share the split Shield of Trents, and Somerset with Trents (eagle) is where Frants/Friends were previously first known!!! Zikers. Tarents (Child Coat in colors reversed) are first known in Dorset with Bushers!

AHH, if that's not enough, German Winners/Weiners are listed with Wansteads while Childs are said to be from Wanstead. Then, Austrian Weiners (Austria with Bustard-connectable Trapps), who love the Eagle's, share the Busher lion!!! Lorraine the babe is pointing to this character, and perhaps God arranged blond Lorraine's beauty to point to Erika's beauty contest. Beautys are first known in Dorset with Bushers, and the triple boars of Bush's are in Beauty colors and format. The Bois-like Boy variation of Beauty-branch Boets/Boeddu's can perhaps apply. German Butts are Boets too, and they love the Constant-loving Rose's.

I'm pretty sure that the orphanage we saw above in Romania's Constantia is Romanian Angels, and so note the "Constantia" motto term of English Herberts!!! ZIKERS. We just saw good evidence that HERberts/HerBUTTs were named after the same that named Hero's/Herrabins, and Lorraine's grass stain was on the BUTT of her pants! It was on her ass while Ass' love Balance's who in turn share half the eagle of Eggs/Edge's (Worcestershire with Wings/Winks), and then while the other half of the Egg/Edge eagle is the Lorraine eagle too, the Agre's/Augers/Etches' we saw above were as per the Grass-connectable "agresses" of Bustards. Greshams are first known in Norfolk with Bus'. Herberts/Herbutts are the ones looking related to Coke's who in turn have the Lorraine eagle too.

Egg-branch Ice's/Ecco's are in my river-flood dream treated in the 3rd update of last month, which pointed to Dan Flood, the TP security guard that tapped his shoulder a second before the rifle shot rang out for staging Charlie's death. I was walking on a water-flooded ROAD with ICE upon it, and Roads share the Egg/Edge eagle. I was walking up this road to TRAFFIC lights, which I deciphered as cross-border trafficking, and as the Eggs share the Child eagle, it looks like child trafficking, which ICE (Immigration and Customs) is supposed to be fighting.

Childs have the Coat of Tarents, first known in Dorset with Bushers, in colors reversed. The triple Tarent eagles are with the neighboring Courcys, first known in Somerset with Lights who are in turn in Child colors and format. Traffic LIGHTs. Lights share the Dale swan in case this is an additional pointer to ScottsDALE. In fact, English Scotts use the Catherine wheels of Road-like Roets, and Scottish Roets are first known in Somerset with Lights and Trents! German Roets share the Scott crescent. To the best of my recollection, the traffic lights were shining red, and Reds are first known in Northumberland with Phoenix's and Roddens/Rodhams, a branch of RothsCHILDs/Rothsteins.

I did go to the Eggs in that December update, but I didn't think of the Roads and Childs at the time. Here's what I did say concerning Mttch Snow's past employment at the Mexcian-US border, at Fort Huachuca:

Snows are first known in Worcestershire with Eggs/EDGE's, a branch of Ice's/Ecco's, and Mitch Snow's real first name is Harry while Harrys/Harris' have "HEDGEhogs"!!! Snowdens are first known in Essex with MITCH's/Muschats, and Muscats/Musks are first known in Cambridgeshire with Wrench's!!!

BERTs are first known in Devon with the Bois-HerBERTs, barons of HalBERTon. Haliburtons share the black boar head with Rabins. Burts (share Bert Coat) are first known in Norfolk with Bus', and with the Marys in turn sharing the lion of English Bois', Russells and Russi's. Scottish Rose's ("Constant" motto term) tell that they married MARY Bosco. These Rose's share the water bouget (different colors) with Bushels and Bouchier's.

Bush elements can be traced to the Buzau river of Romania, land also of a Roxolani branch from the Kiev area. Rose's share a "true" motto term of Home's/Hume's (share BOSton Coat), the latter first known in Berwickshire with Boys'.

So, I now know why God put me together with Mary Nigro, especially as Nigro's have "EARS of wheat" suspect with the Eyer variation of Airs, first known in Derbyshire with Hero's/Herrabins and Here's/Heyers! The latter's "tree trunk" goes with the "tree stump" of Italian Bosco's, especially as Home's/Hume's and Rose's have the True variation of Tree's. The latter are first known in Wiltshire with the Neals who share the split Shield of YARborough's, from Rus king, Yaroslav, brother of Maria of Kiev. Stump-like Stamps (Berkshire with Sheaves'/Shaws) look like Rush kin, and Nigro's look like Sheaves/Shave kin.

Nigro's are first known in Ferrara with Capelli's, and the latter own the "chapeau" found in the Crest of Buttons/Budins (Hampshire with CAPLans). Mary Nigro lived in Buttonville (Ontario) when I knew her.

Italian Milans have another "tree stump" while Scottish Milans/Millens are first known in Aberdeenshire with MELLANsons. Otto Busher had taken us to Otto's/Ottone's, suspect with Ottone Visconti, ruler of Milan. Mellansons have a "bundle of rods" while a "bundle" of arrows is with English Herberts. Berts are first known in Devon with Rods while Tree-loving Roets (Somerset, beside Tree's/True's) have a Coat looking related to Caplans.

VISconti's of Milan can be traced to Vise's, first known in Sussex with Bone's, because Bono's are first known in Milan. Bono's and Ottone-like Odins share a lion of Herberts/Herbutts (CONSTANTia"), and then there's Brian HarPOLE who can apply because one of the Herbert/HerBUTT lion is also the one of Pole's/Pools (Dorset with Bushers, Ports, and Beautys). English Bute's/Butts (share Port Chief) look related to Milan's Maurels/Mauro's. German, Rose-loving Bute's/Butts/Boets, possibly of the Boys/Boets/Boeddu's (Beauty branch), almost have the Coat of Rose-loving Pierro's/Pero's while Pierre's (Languedoc with Rose-loving CONSTANTs) share the lion of French Pole's, first known in Picardy with Cavetts/Cheve's and France's/LaFrench's. Ports are first known partly in Hampshire with Botters and Buttons. Milans/Millens and Melansons are first known in the same place as Chives'/Shewas'.

As the Scottish island of Bute was earlier, Rothesay, it appears that Varangians of Kiev were there with the Budini.

I learned last week that Mitch Snow's birth name was Harry Meyers. It's therefore interesting that Jewish Meyers share half the Coat of Norwegian Eriks. Erika claims to be the daughter of Kent Frantzve, and then, while Frans' are also Frantz's, German and Danish Meyers share the lone France/LaFrench lion.

I'm probably missing quite a few other pointers to Everyday Heroes / Romanian Angels, but I see enough to tend to verify that God set the heraldry up to do so.

Th Veringer kin of Zahringers of Baden used three blue antlers as opposed to the three red ones of Veringers. Zahringers founded bear-using Bern, and so as Varangian Rus likely named bear-depicted Russia because Varangians co-founded Moscow, note the "blue buffalo horns" of Moscowitz's, for the buffalo was a Zahringer symbol too. The ANTler can be part-code for Antrims/Antringtons of the Ant river (Norfolk with Marys and antler-using Bucks) because they use only a bend, the Arms-of-Baden symbol in other colors.

TriggerSmart has an audience working to dig deeper into Turning Point. In the video below, someone found that Turning Point is working in some capacity with Superfeed Technologies, Inc. The latter is owned by, or at least has upon its Board, pro-Israel Tyler Bowyer and Erika's mother, what a scandal. What's Erika's mother got to do with Turning Point? This looks like a way to launder Turning Point money to the Fort Huachuca. Bowyer is/was the carrier of the Turning-Point money bag. Expect $5M transferred to Lori for upgrades on her dog's dog house.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9T1ZS8wVg0

In case you don't watch the short video above, it adds that a data- security company (not dealing in body guards), looking related to the name of a security company (body guards) of Brian Harpole, was formed in Phoenix, where Erika's mother and father lives, a few days before the faked-death event. This data-security company, Integrity Security Services, as compared to Harpole's Integrity Security Solutions, has a primary address in Ashburn, Virginia, and Ashburns are first known in Derbyshire with Hero's/Herrabins while Virginia's are first known in Kent with the Axton location of Ashburn-beloved Actons.

If we think that Brian Harpole can be pointed to by Irish Brians, they share the triple lions in pale of English Lane's (Staffordshire, beside Derbyshire) while Erika's mother was born, Miss Lane. These triple lions are also with English Heffers (Somerset with Lane-connectable Days and Heffer-connectable Coffers) while Irish Heffers share the crescents of Coffers, KIRKbys, and the Roans in the "roan horse" of Lane's.

Kent is also where Greens are first known while Integrity above is a branch of Green Hills Software, co-founded by a Jewish surname, Rosenberg. Integrity has a base, somehow, in Delaware, and DelaWARE's/Ware's (Devon with ASH's, Wearings/Warings and Were's/Wears) share the gold dragon head with Cutters (Dorset) and their Cutler branch. Cutlers are in Green colors and format. Rick Cutler is expected to be a part of Turning Point in some way, and Craven-related Ricks (Cheshire with Actons and Astons) look very linkable to Actons. The latter are expected in both the Craven and Ashburn mottoes.

Wearings/Warings share the checks of Hero-connectable Rabins, and Hero's/HerRABINs are first known in Derbyshire with Archer-branch Larchers. The latter two, sharing gold arrows with Herberts/Herbutts, look very related to the Crest of Cutlers, and are first known in Derbyshire with Hero's/Herrabins.

Arrows/Arras' are first known in Staffordshire with the Lane's and Prets/Prettys, and the latter look related to the Crest of Everys. EVERYday Heroes, owned, if I recall correctly, by Lori Lane Frantzve, same as the one of the SUPERfeed board. Supers (Devon with Every-connectable Ware's, etc.), are in the motto of English Angels. and Everyday Heroes founded Romanian Angels. In his next video, TiggerSmart says that Superfeed was originally "Feed Me, Inc." One company by that name "feeds CHILDREN in third-world countries" (spoken by TriggerSmart), which can go with an orphanage in the family.

Everys/Averys are in the colors and format of Hicks', and while the latter have an "heure" motto term, Vere's/Vairs share the Ever/Eure quadrants. Hicksons, first known in Staffordshire with Prets/Prettys, share eagle legs (different colors) with the Bundle's in the bundle of seven arrows of Herberts/Herbutts. Vere's ruled Oxfordshire, where Peare's and Iverys are first known, and while Iverys are in the colors and near-format of Wears/Were's, Peers/Peirs have their bend in colors reversed.

Back to KNOB Hill Farms grocers, where Kepke and I were stockboys. About two months prior to leaving that place, I dated Allison Bauer, a Jewish girl. Bauers are first known in Bavaria with Rothes'/Rothchilds, and the Rothschilds/ROTHSTEINs share the KNOB/Knobel arrow, we may gather. Erika Kirk is said to be the cousin of Nicole Rothstein, and them Scottish Allison were at Loupe while Loupe's share the tower of German Kirks (Austria with Bauers). About a week after I was let go from this grocery store, Allison Bauer left me for Mike Denardo, another stock boy who had seniority on me, and I think I was let go due to her going to Mike. The point is, Italian Narbonne's/Denardo's, first known in Naples with Romania's/Romans, share the Kirk tower too, and French Narbonne's share the France lion. Loupe's are first known in Aquitaine, where Hero-connectable Rabins (share raven with Rothes'/Rothchilds) are said to have been.

Prior to dating Allison, I dated Darlene Ray/Wray, likewise of Knob Hill Farms, and Darlene's have a "female figure" wearing a "robe" and holding a book. Rothschild-branch Roets (kin of Bough's) use the "book" too, and Robe's/Robbs share the chevron of Rabin-like Robins. Rabin-like RAYbins/Rayborns/Ribons might apply to Darlene Ray. Darlene-branch Darlingtons are first known in Durham with Bough's (bunched arrows), on the Wear river, and Darlene's/Derlings are first known in Devon with Wears/Were's and Rabin-connectable Wearings/Warings. The Rabin raven is on a "GREEN mound" while Mounds are first known in Peebles with Bauer-branch Bowers (bunched arrows) and Scottish Robins. Greens, first known in Kent with Rothes', with Darlene-connectable Deerings, and with the Masons/Massins sharing most of the Darlington motto, look related to the Robe/Robb Coat.

The Spears/Spire's in the Darlington and Mason/Massin motto are also Speyers, and Speyer is where Rothschilds/Rothsteins are first known. Thus, Darlene Ray can point to Erika Kirk's relationship to Rothsteins, though nobody has been able to show, that I know of, how she's related to Rothsteins beyond Nicole Rothstein being her cousin. Rothes is a Scottish location on a Spey river.

As we all called our Knob-Hill manager, "Gill," though I'm not sure how it's spelled, it's first notable that Scottish Rays are first known in a Gill location. Then, Gills are first known in Yorkshire with the Feet/FATE's who share the footless martlets of McGills. However, Hall of Names shows the McGill martlets in the colors of the same of Phoenix's/Fenwicks (Northumberland with Hepburns/Heppurns) and Hips'/Hipperns, explaining why the McGill Crest shows a phoenix, the Phoenix/Fenwick symbol too. The latter surname has a "faithful" term in its English-version motto, and Faithfuls are listed with Fate-like Faiths, first known in Norfolk with the Hips'/Hipperns (almost have the Phoenix/Fenwick Coat).

Therefore, Darlene Ray can point to Erika Kirk of Phoenix by her Ray surname. Rays are even first known in Cumberland with Kirk-beloved Daggers/Dackers while Decks/Daggers look related to the Hips'/Hipperns. The latter even have a "Keep" motto term. These English Kirks are first known in Yorkshire with Gills, and Decks/Daggers share the squirrel of GILberts (Devon with Berts) who are in turn in Hepburn/Heppurn format and colors reversed from them. Comyns (Norfolk with Hips'/Hipperns) use a "dagger" too, as do Kilpatricks, first known near the first-known McGills.

Gilberts are first known in Devon with Phoenix-connectable Fauns/Phones' and Fenns/Venns. Fane's/Vans/Phone's are also Fiens while "fine" is a McGill motto term. Likewise first known in Devon are Flowers and Jewels; the latter have "GILLYflowers." Another dagger is with the Scottish Shaws (Comyn and Fien colors and format), first known in Perthshire with the Rinds having "gillie flowers." Gillie's have the Touch's in their motto who have a Tuff variation, and then Tafts/Tuffs' (Cheshire with early Touch's) share the red phoenix with McGills. Wait, houseofnames now says that Tufts/Tuffs' are first known in Northumberland, which is where Phoenix's/Fenwicks are first known.

Scottish Bosco's: "...silver pillars, out of each, a gold TUFT of grass." English Grasse's (Pilate/Pilot colors) are first known in Lincolnshire with Cup-Loving Pilate-branch Pilotte's/PILLERs while Pillars/Pilots/Pile's can take us to English Pile's, previously first known in Northumberland, where Tufts/Tuffs' are now first known. English Pile's are first known in Somerset with Points who share a hand pointing with Touch's/Tuffs (same place as Cups), and then I assume that Pontius Pilate was named after Point-like Pontus elements. Cups love the Bosco-related Rose's. Dutch Bosco's are also Bos'/Bush's, and then Bostons have the Touch/Tuff Coat in colors reversed. Bussy's/Bushe's share the Coat of Finchems (Norfolk with Bus') and of Fine's, the latter first known in Burgundy with Pilate's/Pilots (in the colors and format of the Bosco pillars). It explains why Ponts (Hampshire, beside Bushers) and Ponters share black boars with English Bush's.

I trace king Pharnaces of the Pontus to Furness', and they share the black dog with Bouchier's who in turn have the water bougets of Bushels in colors reversed. I saw the fesse of English Bush's (Yorkshire with BIRDforth) in red, for example the one of French Bussys/Bussers, making the Bush fesse-with-items look related to one of the Bird/Burd Coats (Cheshire), and so this can be explained where Bushels are first known in Birdforth.

Again, I'm not familiar with French Bussys/Bussers, but this goes excellently with the BUS stop of Lorraine, for French Bussys/Bussers happen to share the Lorraine and Child eagle, and then Lorraine had gotten a GRASS stain on her pants from a LAWN! Bussys/Bussers can therefore point to Otto Busher and Lori Lane!!! It's undeniable. And the Childrens use "birds."

Bossie's share the Coat of German Kirks! Boss' have a giant red bull to perhaps go with the giant black-on-RED bull head of German Otto's/Auto's, and because Sleeping Beauty appeared at an auto, I reckoned that the black bulls of Beautys (branch of giant-bull BOYS/Boeddu's) is the Otto/Auto bull, which now points to Otto Busher.

"FrantzVE" is pronounced, frantz-vay, and so note that Dutch Veys share the German Kirk Coat while adding a boot in Crest. The boot has a spur while Spurrs are first known in Devon (beside Cornwall) with Angel-beloved Supers. Angels use a cane but call it a "baston" while English Bastons/Batons are first known in Cornwall with English Veys/Vivians. Bastons/Batons share the black bat (just the wings, actually) with Bats who in turn share the Super saltire.

The Touch's/Tuffs share the Coat of Lyons, important because the latter are first known in Perthshire with Colts/Cults having the Pilate/Pilot pheon in colors reversed. Pontius Pilate's Wikipedia article says, or once said, that Pilate's father was a Roman ambassador to the Picts of Perthshire, and that he mated with a Pict there to birth Pontius. "Perth" is thus suspect with the PERDryx peak of Mont Pilat, which happens to be near Lyon.

Therefore the pointing Touch/Tuff hand is looking like a verification that Points were related to "Pontius / Pontus." Hands, first known in Cheshire, where both Tufts/Tuffs' and Touch's/Tuffs were previously first known, are in Cup colors and format. Pontius Pilate washed his hands of the murder of Jesus. The Travers in the Forez motto were kin of Cheshire's Meschin earls, and Mont Pilat is near the Forez mountains.


Trump News

Trump's not fooling anyone, he invaded Venezuela to control its oil. By announcing that he's running Venezuela for the foreseeable future, he saying no more oil sales to China and Russia. Ya-but, this is illegal. You can't just control a country to curb who it does business with, wherefore Trump is clearly in the hands of the shadow government. I claimed months ago that when Trump made the deal with the deep state to fake his assassination, he was agreeing to being in its pocket, to promise and do what it wanted done if it could get him re-elected. The agreement to fake the assassination was his signing the deal with his blood, for if he backtracks, the shadow government will expose him as faking the assassination. We're now seeing the fruit: the Trump quest to seize country after country for building American globalism. As early as Wednesday this week, the White House announced that it will take some profits from Venezuelan oil sales, as if Trump's base will be happy with such piracy. The Democrats are going to play this heist into the coming elections. Trump has not become a fool, make no mistake; he's always been one.

This fool is a liar, seeking to convince the world that he needs to seize Greenland to quell the Chinese and Russian threat. What? Since when are those countries a threat along Greenland? Rather, it's an assault against canada.

Trump will probably take credit for toppling Iran because he's perhaps the single-most responsible party for starting a civil war, for he announced publicly that the United States will enter the war if the Islamic regime fires bullets at protesters. Such a statement, along with urgings from Israel to fight on, can only ramp up the protests that evolve into a civil war.

I support the fall of the Islamic regime, in theory, anyway, or if it's purely done by Iranians. But as things are now, Americo-Israeli involvement could ramp up a world-war scenario by having the West control Iranian oil. With such a shift, one can start to fathom why "the kings of the east" enter the Iraq theater at Armageddon. The world was just fine before Israel invaded Gaza this last time, because the Iran-Hezbollah-Hamas axis was fruitless in harming Israel. Israel allowed Hamas to kill Israelis, two years ago last October, as a pretext for putting Trump's Gaza plots into action, wickedness.

Dan Bongino, another foul-mouthed, tattooed "Christian" podcaster was elevated to the FBI by the same jackass in the White House who's in league with Turning Point. Bongino is firmly on Turning Point's side in the Kirk scandal, because Turning Point has been loyal to the FBI narrative. More news came out this week to pit Erika Kirk in with military elements.

Tulsi Gabbard is not speaking out against an invasion of Venezuela, as she did in the past long before it took place, because Trump now forbids her. In the same way, Trump is to blame for the 180-turn of Patel and Bongino. The latter were wrong to do it, but they did it anyway because they covet their new-found "respectable" positions in the FBI. Instead of blasting Trump for forcing them to go against their own mouths prior to Trump's re-election, Bongino is now a dynamite-blasting crusader for loyalist-Trumpers whose new target is loyal-to-their-convictions podcasters on the verge of dumping Trump for his betrayals on multiple fronts.

Firmly on the side of Trump, Bongino's new attitude is to win the mid-term elections at the cost of letting Trump's betrays slide. Bongino's hard head is a wrecking ball, and he wields a bundle of dynamite sticks in his hands to help blow apart the MAGA movement. He and the other, end-justifies-the-means loyalists are the ones truly responsible for dividing the party because the loyal-to-their-own-convictions Trumpers are the only way to defeat the Democrats in 2028.

Therefore, for the sake of keeping Trump from becoming a lame duck in 2026, the Bongino side of things is about to throw away 2028 to the Democrats. It was the loyal-to-their-own-convictions Trumpers who defeated the Democrats three times in a row. That's the camp that Bongino and Trump have betrayed. On one of the three occasions, the Bidenites stole the election and foisted January 6 upon the party. It was not foisted on Trump alone, but on his voters. It was a mass crime. Yet Bongino and Patel were unable to punish the criminals because their twisted boss would not permit them. Patel and Bongino, instead of taking sides with the straight voters, decided to support the twisted one, the maggot in the White House who's come to suck on war-hawk garbage, who re-defines "RINO" as those who complain about his becoming a loyalist of the Empire builders.

There's no shortage of Americans who dream of an American empire, and so Trump is trying to tighten these nuts upon his machinery. John Bolton might even start to like him. The peacemakers are warning that this machinery looks like world war. The invasion of Venezuela appears to be Trump crossing the peacemaker line into chaos. "Peace by war" is an oxymoron, and Trump has already exposed that the ultimate aim is not peace, but seizure of oil and other empire-building treasures.

The talk of an invasion of Greenland is a sign that he and his empire-building nuts wish for oil-tanker supremacy through the waters of northern canada. If they can cut off oil sales and deliveries from/to China and Russia by that route, they think they can win a world war. Trump is even punishing India just because it buys Russian oil. The only explanation is that Trump is desirous of toppling Russia.

Just want to say that there are a slew of Russia-lovers on the anti-Trump side who always sympathize with Palestinians too. I'm not for this crowd that, for example, judge Napolitano and Redacted feature regularly. They are too pro-Russia for my liking. To my liking, Russia has been a good counter-balance against American globalism, and I fear the latter far more than Russia because it's an exporter of porn, Epsteinism, sodomy, police-state futurism, and billionaire-class mentalities that include criminal / murderous "population control." Russia has no desire or capability to control the world, and does not wish to foist such things as porn, sodomy, and the Hollywood mentality from the billionaire-Jew class.

One of Russia's options, as Trump wages war against it, is to use Muslims for an invasion of Israel, and in the meantime to do a coup on American-oil spigots in the Middle East. It's been afraid to try it, but with Religious Iran now seemingly on the brink, Russia has a big decision to make on whether it will come to its aid. The longer it procrastinates as Trump's lunatics tighten the screws, the more likely Russia will become too weak to salvage even itself. I think I will admit that I'd rather see Russia in peaceful partnership with the Arab world than the latter catering to the American shadow government which I assume is run by Rothchilian dragons. To me, the stronger the latter become, the more the ruin of the common people is assured.

I didn't know until now that Rothschilds introduced Alan Dershowitz to Jeffrey Epstein:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/MQQ02P88Oqs

I tend to think that frown-on-Trump MAGAites oppose the billionaire-Jew class without being anti-Semitic at their bones. Their definition of "MAGA" is for the common people to get a fair shake in their war against the billionaire class. They foolishly trusted Trump to be on the side of the common people, and are now seeing the firstfruits of that viper: proud and relentless betrayal. The only thing keeping this machinery from crushing all hope is Trump's need to win the mid-term election. He will continue to give some semblance of fighting for the people. He might decrease their gas prices, for example, and toss out some other biscuits, but he's clearly not on their side.

Note below how Thomas Massie reveals that every Republican congressman has an Israeli babysitter to assure they stay in line, or else. If a Republican tells us he/she has no Israeli babysitter, it's probably because they do what Israel wants done. Logically, they get a call from a babysitter only when stepping out of line, which can explain why they change their tune right away. Note too how Trump admits that his father told him that the Israeli lobby runs America, which can only be the Rothschilian beast that Trump now serves, whom I think God is at war with, to expose it, anyway. This video has pro-Israel Bongino as a primary topic:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNez0MR9DIE

It is an oxymoron to be pro-Rothschild and anti-deep state. Hello? I suggest we keep an eye out for evidence that Trump's blowhard confidence comes from Rothschild backing, or that he's nothing but a Rothschild blowhorn.

The Christian video producer above (An0maly) uses some obscene language from time to time, which is the top slip on the slippery slope. Christian podcasters need to be told to stop polluting their tongues in efforts to be "cool." Devolution is not cool, but self-inflicting. If you like the idea of having God on your side when you really need Him, keep your tongue clean. Work for Him, and He will work for you. Ignore Him on the small things, and you will ignore Him on the big things eventually, at the bottom of the slippery slope.

Israel is not the danger to America. It's the American Rothschilians who support Israel, the Shadow Government able to control Jewish and non-Jewish politicians alike. Thomas Massie's current fate is an exposure of that rot that the Trump maggot sucks. This president has the head of an insatiable maggot, but is growing the legs of a war hawk under the wings of a Rothschilian dragon. Rothschilds are said to love war for the profits.

It had been my impression, more than a decade ago, that Democrats were given the red color while Republicans were assigned blue. Then, when I started to cover Trump politics in about 2016, I saw that the color scheme had flipped. I therefore asked google just now: "were american democrats ever red rather than blue?" The response: "Yes, for decades before the 2000 election, there was no standard color scheme, and major news networks frequently used red to represent Democrats." My point is that there is a fable claiming that "Rothschild" means "red shield," and then Trump hats are red. Note that Childs are white on a red Shield. RothsCHILD.

One can ascertain that, since most Jews voted Democrat, Rothschilds were pro=-Democrat. Then, something happened. Even Rockefellers, who started out Democrat, started to support (and no-doubt infiltrate) the Republican party. Hence, the "neo-cons" under George Bush (2000-2008), otherwise known as "war hawks." Trump, in his first term, quietly, but not invisibly, supported Bushites. See that? He put Bushites at the head of his DoJ. See that? It smacks Rothschilian obedience.

Childs are in Donkey / Duncan colors, and the donkey is the Democrat symbol. The Child Coat is in colors reversed with Tarents, and the latter's Coat is in gold with the Diss' of Disce. Donkeys and Duncans use a "Disce" motto term. Tarents are first known in Dorset, beside Webbs and Webbers (Somerset with Tarrs and Shins), and Webbers have a "disk" in Crest. The English-version motto of Webbers includes "Lilies outSHINE," and Lily's (Child colors) are first known in Worcestershire with Bauer-beloved Wings, and with the Pattys suspect in the "Disce pati" motto of Donkeys. Pattys share the lion of English Rothes'.

The fleur-de-lys is a lily, thought to be owned first by the heir of king CHILDeric the Franc. Webbers put the fleur-de-lys of France in their disk, and German Webbers/Weavers share the stars of proto-Rothschild Bauers, from Frankfurt (possibly named after royal/noble Francs). English Weavers were kin of Hazels/Hessels (Devon with Ash's/Esse's and French's) while Hesse's/Hessels remind that Mayer Bauer-Rothschild had a banking bonanza in Hesse-Cassel. German Cassels (Bavaria with Rothes'/Rothschilds and Bauers) look related to German Ash's/Asch's while Diss-like Dess' (Worcestershire) are thought to be from "D'Assche." Dess' are suspect in the motto of Donkey-loving Chamberlains (Diss colors and format). There's nothing holy in this picture, just Rosicrucian rot infiltrating / controlling the co-founders of the United States with a quasi-Christian mask.

Make a distinction between those Bushites who despised Trump when he wasn't openly on the war-hawk side, and those who have unlatched from him due to his showing his true colors.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFdjMUbZYQk

There wouldn't be any issue if the only concern were the as-usual, multi-billion, annual U.S. payment to Israel, for each billion is only seven dollars per American worker. But Trump's foreign policy now seems to be in partnership with Israelo-Rothschilian empire building with printed money, the seizing of real $$$ from entire nations by the might of the American military, and by brutal violation of the character of the Creator.

This week's Highwire has much to celebrate. This video goes in the Trump-news section because Trump is the fiend who foisted vaccines on the people, and then Trump voters got Robert Kennedy into the Health department who's now getting away with things that is painfully cringe for the vaccine companies, and the great news is that Trump is so afraid of losing the mid-terms (i.e. so low in the polls) that he won't dare shut Kennedy down unless he wants to lay himself into his own political grave. We can stick our tongues out at Trump, but he'd still be powerless to oppose us unless he's suicidal politically.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/0MIx0S7Sctlb


NEWS

You'll need to read between the lines in this video, as per Larry Silverstein, because youtube is a pro-Israeli censor that doesn't allow the video owner to speak fully freely:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KkkhiBoVIo

A young woman in an older woman's body gets vengeance on her pedophile-rapist pastor:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_k88BVYafWA

What I don't understand is, that while the "pastor" raped her at 16, she says the sex continued for nine more years. How could that not have been consensual? I don't understand. What I do understand is the up-side, that the biggest of sinners are welcome in coming to Jesus. It's just that the downside is, for many, they can't keep their unkosher sausages in their pants even after becoming Christians. The Bathsheba effect is harder to deal with in this promiscuous society than when king David ruled. I do not think that God's grace is very ample when a pastor commits adultery on his own wife for nine years while remaining at the pulpit. It's just so shameful and hurtful; it's making people shrink back from churches, but you just remember that you are not serving pastors, but Jesus, fully righteous and dependable.




NEXT UPDATE Next Monday


Here's all four Gospels wrapped into one story.


For Some Prophetic Proof for Jesus as the Predicted Son of God.
Also, you might like this related video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3EjmxJYHvM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efl7EpwmYUs

Pre-Tribulation Preparation for a Post-Tribulation Rapture