January 1 - 5, 2026
Chuck Luksa Points to Fort Huachuca
or
News Section Last Section
I haven't watched this video because I'm familiar with the material. I've watched a few videos from Ash Maiz to feel confident that he's got respectability on this topic of Old-Testament evidence that Jesus is the Messiah. This video is over two hours long, and so if you haven't got time to see it now, but want to, I'll leave it at the very top of this update so you can find it easily at any time:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3p7OcrY51k
Hall of Names is once again showing the descriptions of the Coats of Arms presented at House of Names. Click off (not on) of purple box to get started.
It's now been over a week since Candace disclosed the claim of Mitch Snow that he saw two leaders of the pro-Israel Turning Point "corporation" (my term), and one staff member of the pro-Israeli propagandist, Daily Wire, at Fort Huachuca on September 8 and 9. Sufficient time has passed to make supporters of these organizations suspicious as to why none of the "accused" has presented phone records to serve as alibis, to show that they were elsewhere, not at Huachuca on those days.The argument can be made that Candace was malicious for reporting the claim of Mitch Snow before checking in with Erika Kirk, to get her side of the story? Candace's pro-Israeli adversaries are insinuating that very claim, that she didn't want corroboration prior to releasing Mitch's claims, but wanted only to imply that Turning Point is a party guilty of covering up the "assassination" of Charlie Kirk. Granted, that accusation against Candace can be justified, but, her gamble has produced good fruit for her side, and her sin is a lightweight in comparison to the failure of Turning Point and Daily Wire to squelch Mitch's claims when they can be squelched too easily with phone records. Therefore, both organizations appear dreadfully complicit with the assassination.
If I say to you that I saw a man laying on the floor with a knife in his leg, I don't need to insinuate anything. I don't need to accuse someone of sticking a knife in his leg. The mere telling of the story makes that implication without me doing so. Ditto for Candace. She has implied nothing, but her telling Mitch's story is what makes the implications. At first, the implications were lightweight because he is only one witness, but the reaction to him from Turning Point and its supporters have turned Candace into Mike Tyson with lead fingers in his gloves.
By now, after so many backfires from the Turning Point team, I call out Tulsi Gabbard as a fiend if she doesn't promptly question Erika Kirk and her fellow leaders as per TP's involvement at Huachuca. I feel the same way about John Ratcliffe because he is in charge of spying out potential military criminality at a border point. The fact is, Turning Point has long been an arm of pro-Israeli Trump. The question is, what else was Turning Point into aside from raising youth votes for Trump, and has Trump been in it too? Gabbard and Ratcliffe do not need Trump's permission to investigate Turning Point, but he can shut them down to the point that they would need to risk being fired if they don't comply.
Candace below shows she's not afraid whatsoever of law suits, for she's talking on steroids without holding back much, which her lawyer(s) would not condone unless she is very safe. She gives the audience a full re-cap of the Mitch-Snow claims, and invites people on X to question her entertainment of Mitch's claims. She also does a good job exposing why Turning Point appears partnered with Fort Huachuca, which justifies seeking out further realities about those ties.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToaU4XpYvZYYou may have spotted in the video above that Erika flew to see Candace IMMEDIATELY after the Fort Huachuca story broke from Mitch. Yet Candace, in being soft, didn't question Erika about it, or, if she did, isn't telling what was said, perhaps at the request of Erika. Still, there's no indication that Candace is throwing off the Huachuca story; quite the contrary.
Candace says elsewhere that she emailed Cabot Phillips (they never spoke or texted previously) to ask if he was at Huachuca on the 8th and 9th, but he did not respond, which is the same as incriminating himself. Before Candace showed Mitch a photo of Phillips, or indicated to Mitch that she was going to bring Phillips up as a topic, Mitch said that he saw a man wearing a watch worn by military pilots. When Candace showed Mitch Phillips' photo, Mitch said that he saw him with Erika on the 8th, then saw him again the next morning, and moreover Candace later discovered that Cabot's grandfather was an "an airforce guy." French Pile's/Pilots share the giant Phillips lion.
When asking myself whether God might have pointed to CHUCKs/Suchs/Suckers with "HuaCHUCa," I found it interesting that Chucks/Suchs/Suckers had come up in the past as per Sassy my cat SUCKing her tail. Sassy was a topic in the 2nd and 3rd updates of last month. The Sassy surname, sharing "Saracen heads" with cat-using Cattans, happen to have a Such-like Sauchy variation. Amazingly, Luksa-like Lucca's have a giant cat.
You can click Chucks, which loads them on another tab in order to load other surnames, to better follow the heraldic links.
The thing is, LOUISE PHILLIPs was a topic (in my updates) just prior to my knowing of Cabot Phillips, and I claimed that she pointed to Erika Kirk in those times. Louise is in the 3rd update of last month, all explained there. I had said that Welsh Louis' are first known in Glamorganshire with Tail-branch Tillers, and so I've got to repeat here that, when I lived with Louise Phillips, I painted "Tea for the TILLERman" on a KITCHEN wall. The Arms of Glamorganshire have the triple chevrons of MITCH's/MusCHATs in colors reversed. Sassy had pointed to Banister-related and kitten-like Kitchens (Lancashire with cat-using Penningtons) because a customer gave her to me, as a kitten, when I was stripping and refinishing her stair banister. Here's from the 4th update of this past November:
Here's what I wrote several times, for example in the 4th update of January, 2018: "...I painted a full kitchen wall, while living with Louise and Chris Peare, with an album cover (Tea for the Tillerman) from CAT Stevens." I emphasized "Cat" because Louise worked for Pennington clothing at the time, and cat-using Penningtons almost have the French Louis Coat. Penningtons [and Louis'] almost have the Bagley Coat, important because Chris Peare was on a stage at the end of the sleeping-BAG dream. The Patria's/PEARtree's, in the Pennington and Phillips motto, share the Trump stag head and the Pulling scallops. I was pulling Peare toward me on that stage.The point of going back to fetch the Tea For The TILLERman album cover (belonged to Kepke) is because of Tyler Robinson, for Tylers are listed with Tillers (same place as Welsh Louis', I stress). After Louise and Chris moved out of my apartment, I saw Louise one more time, just bumping into her, when she told me she was going into "choreography." Stage productions. Therefore, going all the way back to my late teens, it appears that God was setting up pointers to the staging of the Kirk shooting by the FBI, Robinson, and others. The Amore's in the Pennington and Phillips motto are first known in Oxfordshire with Peare's.
Chris Peare was dating LAWRENCE Kepke at the time that she was friends with Louise, and, some five years earlier, Kepke and I collected golf balls in the Rouge river through CEDARbrae golf club (Toronto), after which we both became caddies at the same golf club at age 14. Catti-line Keiths had a Caddy branch, first known in Yorkshire with Keppochs. Caddy's share "pennants" with Cowes'/Coo's, the latter first known in Lancashire with Penningtons and Lawrence's, and it just so happens that the latter two surnames are first known in Lonsdale in particular. CEDARs/Cottars are first known in the same place as Peare's and Amore's, and Brae's/Brays, as per CedarBRAE, are first known in Northamptonshire with Pennys.
It just so happens that Sassys/Sauchers and Cattans share the "Saracen head" with Scottish, Amore-like More's/Muirs while English More's have the Bag cinquefoils in colors reversed. Chucks/SUCH's/Suckers are first known in Lancashire with Kitchens, and with GorSUCH's who in turn share the bend-with-Eagle's of Lorraine's. The latter share laurel branch with Kittens/Keatons. It's got Louise Phillips all over it. Scottish More's share the fesse-with-stars of SNOWdens! The latter are first known in Essex with Mitch's/Muschats! Mitch Snow identified Cabot Phillips! Snowdens even share the Peartree/Patria and Pully/Pulling scallops. More's/Muirs (share Hare fesse) are first known in Ayrshire with the Hare's in the "hare" of the Crest of Shake's/Shacks (Lancashire with Chucks/Suchs/Suckers).
Ahh, Shake's/Shacks have, not moles, but moleHILLs while Hills are first known in Worcestershire with Snows!!! I link Shake's/Shacks to the heraldic scimitar that we find in the Crest of Lawrence-beloved Readys (share swan of French Phillips). The Bee's suspect in the Lawrence motto are first known in Oxfordshire.
I dare say that Sassys/Sauchy and Chucks/Such's were a Shake/Shack branch, in which case my cat is pointing very strongly to Mitch Snow, who was earlier called by his birth name, HARRY!!! While Chucks/Suchs are first known in the same place as GORsuch's, "franGOR" is a motto term of More's/Muirs. We got to the More's via the Amore's in the Phillips motto. Gowers/Gore's use "FRANGas," like "Frangor," and have bars in the colors of the double fesses of English Hare's and HARcourts (Oxfordshire with Amore's!) who in turn share a peacock in Crest with Snowdens (Essex with Peacocks)! Peacocks share a "fear" motto term with Irish Hare's/Jarrys/Garrys.
I'd like to repeat here that I once managed a TILE store on GORham drive (Newmarket), and Gorhams have another "Ready" motto term. The Faiths/Faithfuls in the Gorham motto were likely a branch of Fate's/Feets (Yorkshire with Gowers/Gore's) because the Fetters are in the Gorham fetterlocks, though in this case those fetterlocks are called, "SHACKleBOLTs" probably as code for Shake's/Shacks or Shackle's/Shakels, both first known in Lancashire with Bolts (Tile/Tilly colors and format) and Boltons.
Irish More's share the giant lion of Morgans who likely named Morgannwg, now Glamorgan, where Welsh Louis' and Lewis' are first known.
When heraldic links work this good, it helps me to believe that God arranged events and dreams in my life to make pointers to certain things, and in this case it looks like a pointer to Cabot Phillips of DAILY Wire. Dillons, sharing the motto of Masons/Massins, share half the Daily lion, and the other half of the Daily lion can be the one of Phillips', first known in Kent with Masons/Massins, and with Lewis- and Tile-beloved Dragons/Drainers. The Phillips lion is the giant lion of Welsh Louis' (same place as Tillers) in colors reversed, and as I've said many times recently, the Phillips and Pile/PILOT (and Powell) lion is also the one of Palins/Pawleys who named the Plain and PLANES variations of Platters.
The courant greyhound in the Daily Crest is used also with Pennington-like Pennys, and Pendrys/Pendragons share the Plain/Planes/Platter fleur-de-lys in colors reversed.
Dillons share the Dean/Dean and Croc crescent while the "crocoDILE" of Irish Dene's can be expected with the Dile's/Dills because they share the giant Dene/Dean lion. Irish Dene's are first known in Galway while Galways have a "cat." Galways love the Bridge's, first known in Somerset with Pool-beloved Pollets and Paulins, and while Pools are first known in Dorset with Palins/Pawleys and Tile's/Tillys, German Tile's/Tillers share the Frans/Frantz annulet.
To justify going to the Dailys, as per Cabot Phillips, WIRE's/Vere's, who ruled Oxford for centuries, almost have the Coat of Scottish More's while Amore's and Damorys/Amori's are first known in Oxfordshire. Wire's/Vere's share the Moray and French Phillip star, and English Vere's/Vairs share the star of Italian Amori's and Tea's. Tea for the Tillerman. Welsh Phillips have an "amor" motto term. DAILY WIRE. Dale's even share a white swan with French Phillips. While Sassys/Sauchys share the Saracen head with Cattans, Chattans are first known in Roxburghshire with Wire's/Vere's.
"Mori" happens to be a motto term of Cabot-like Cabes' who use "salmon," wherefore the Cabot fish may have been salmon at one time (due to a Cabot-line marriage to Salmons / Salemans). Salmons are first known in Cumberland with More-beloved Saracens, and Saracen-beloved Sassys are first known in Devon with Weir-branch Wears, Ware's, and Warings. Wears are said to have married Giffards who in turn have a "mori" motto term.
Plus, the McAbbe variation of Cabes' can get us the Abbe's/Abbys who share the scallops of Capes'/CAPETs (almost "Cabot"), but also to the Abbe-branch Apps'/Epps previously first-known in Middlesex with Vere-branch Fiers/Fears. The latter almost have the moline cross of Sarasins, the latter first known in Brittany with Vair-branch Ferrats/Fers. French Vairs are first known in Burgundy with French Fairs, and Sarasins share the giant moline of Irish Fairs. The latter have a "tuTUS" motto term while Tous'/Tosini's have a man "WEARING" a "shirt" while the Shard variation of Shirts is suspect with Sardinia, where Italian Amori's are first known.
In the first update of last month, while on the DuPonts highlighted by Candace Owens (once worked for Daily Wire):
I kid you not that, just after writing the above, I took my mirror outside to shave off my beard, when I heard caws above my head, I looked up and one crow was chasing another. It's the first crow I've seen since the toilet-event. They flew in the chase over the ponds, and then went out of sight, and I realized right there, with electric SHAVER in hand, that Chase's are first known in Hampshire with Ponts! Case's are first known in Norfolk with Crows, and Shave's are listed with Sheaves'/Chiava's, in case they apply. Ahh, Shaver-like Savers/Severs share the Frans/Frantz annulets!!!It looks like a pointer to Erika FRANTzve Kirk. There was a lot more to that shave event, but the point here is as per the owner of Daily Wire, BEN Shapiro, for Shaver-like Shapers are listed with Shapiro's, and they share the "lamb" with Shavers/Shafers. I failed to realize this in the December updates. Bens/Bends are interesting for sharing red roundels with Shirts/Shards (Cheshire with Bens/Bends), in colors reversed from the besants (roundels) of and Chucks/Suckers/Saucers. Bens/Bends even share the besants of Sassys/Sauchys who in turn share the crescent of French Phillips.
Ben was born, Benjamin, and Benjamins (Norfolk with Sassy-connectable Cattans) share the annulet of Schole's/Scayle's while Scale's share the scallops of Capes'/Capets. Schole's/Scayle's (Yorkshire with Benjamin-connectable Banks) share the lozengy Shield of Orems/Orrins, and while Charlie faked his murder in Orem, Utah, "ORMsKIRK is where CHUCKs/Suckers (Lancashire with Forts and Shacks) are first known. FORT HuaCHUCa.
The only reason I know of the Chuck variation of Suckers is as per Chuck Luksa, my short-term partner in a fence-post product that was called, "Pillar-Post." Pillars are listed with the Pile's/Pilots sharing the giant Phillips and Palin lion. I've done Pillar-Post heraldry before, which is why Chucks were looked up. Posts (Hampshire with Potters and Pots) probably share the Coat of Pools/Pulls, the latter first known in neighboring Dorset with Palins.
Potters can apply to the Poitou / Poitiers location of the first-known, Shave-branch Clave's, and then while Sassys/Sauchys share the Saracen head with Cattans (Norfolk with cat-using CATCH's and Wheats), Rose-loving French Chatans are first known in Poitou too. Shave's are also the Sheaves' in the "sheaves of wheat" of Caddys. French Chatans can even be sharing the Kirk tower closely because Kirkners are first known in Silesia with German Rose's. Scottish Rose's share the black water bouget with the Kitchens/KETCHins and Banisters. Sassy was given to me by a customer whose banister I had re-stained. Repeat: Luksa-like Lucca's have a giant cat. The Botters/Botini's, first found in Lucca, are suspect in the "bot" motto term of Clan Chattan, a motto used also by Bane's/Beans.
[I didn't know while writing up here that there is a "beardgate" online this week, involving Cabot's beard, which I'll get to shortly below. A couple of updates ago, I told that Turning Point employed a Shaffer security company.]
Cabot Phillips works for Shapiro, and Phillips has a tattoo, "PIZZA," on his lip, and Pisa is right beside Lucca. Shave's are also Chiava's while Chives' share the motto of Scottish Lipps, first known in Aberdeenshire with Bane's/Beans. Lucca is near the first-known Bruno's, and then Browns/Bruns have a brown lion while Scottish Lipps use brown "CATamountains" (mountain cats). Bruno's (Florence with Italian Ferrands) are first known in Florence/FIRENZE, the line to English Ferrands, very connectable to the neighboring FRANTs/Friends, and Erika Frantzve, before she had her Kirk surname, was probably sleeping with Cabot Phillips. Chives', using "cat-a-mountains," are first known in TARVES (Aberdeenshire with Lipps), and the Vito's/VIo's, first known in TARVISium, share the Frans/Frantz annulet. See that? "Vi" is a motto term of Chives' and Lipps. We are pointing to Cabot's lip tattoo, suspect with pizzagate pedophilia.
Beards/Bards are first known in Lanarkshire with the Allisons of Lipp-like Loupe, and Loupe's share the tower of German Kirks. Beards/Bards share the boar of Turins (Aberdeenshire), and CHIVASso, on the BAUTica river, is near Turin. French Beards use a giant bull appropriate for a Turin symbol. Clermont-Ferrand is in Auvergne with the first-known Bauds/BAUTs/BOTs, and Auvergne's share the Kirk tower too. The Towers share the tower of Reines-beloved Comets, and Reines' add the Coat of pizza-like Pisa's, in colors reversed, to their "comet." Renier of MontFERRAT was beside Turin. The Mosca's, first known in Pisa, use the Chives / Lipp mountain cat as a leopard. Lucca is beside Pisa, and Lucca's have a giant cat.
The comet together with the Pisa Coat in colors reversed has been suggested in the past, by me, to be a pointer to Comet Ping Pong pizza, the "pizzagate" place. The pizzeria is/was owned by James AleFANTIS, and then Fantis' are first known in Bologna with Pinc-branch Panico's/Pane's. I know they're branches because the Pings/Pongs/Pagans, sharing the four-pointed label of Panico's/Pane's, are first known in Yorkshire with Pincs, and Panico's/Pane's share the fleur-de-lys of English Pagans (Comet colors and format). Pincs share the lozenges of Reines-like Reno's/Rhine's, and Panico's (find them online) were in the Setta valley that drains at the Reno river. Fantis', using "HUMan heads" that show like boy's heads, share the Panico/Pane Chief exactly. HUME's are first known in Berwickshire with Boys. Pizzagate is about boy abuse. Cabot Phillips has a "PIZZA" tattoo.
About the time that Erika dated or married Cabot Phillips, she was dating "JT Massey" (Joseph Tyler Massey), a baseball player, I'm now hearing, interesting where Base's share the BRUNswick Coat. Bruno was my neighbor when I lived on Senator Reesors drive (Markham, Ontario), and Reesors (Lincolnshire with Base's) share the vaired patee cross of English Ferrands. Massey-branch Meschins from the Bessin birthed earl Ranulph de Gernon, and Gernons share the Base and Brunswick Coat too. Markhams are first known in Nottinghamshire with Frants/Friends. Meschin-related Wolvers look related to the French Ferrand/Ferrent Coat.
I checked to get the correct spelling for "Luksa," and found Chuck's Wikipedia article on his hockey career. One of the several teams he played for was the KITCHENER Rangers, and Kitchens list Kitheners! Zinger. I didn't write "re-stained" above for anything to do with this paragraph, but I now see that Rangers share the Coat of English Bruns, first known in Middlesex with Stains. Chuck also played for the Phoenix Roadrunners, and Phoenix, where Erika and some of her family live, is not far from Fort Huachuca!
Banisters may have been named after Banes' while cat-using Bane's/Beans/VEANs were a member of Clan Chattan. Stain-branch Steins are first known in Norfolk with Cattans ("foVEAN" motto term) and Catch's/Ketch's, and then the Cautes' in the Cattan motto are first known in Languedoc with French Banes' who in turn share the Coat of Mitch's/Muschats. English Banes' share the Sassy crescent. It appears that God secured that banister-staining job.
Chuck Luksa won the Calder Cup, and while Calders have a "cadit" motto term, Cadots/Cado's, in Chattan/Cato colors, have a "touche" motto term to go with the "Touch" of Bane's/Beans, the latter first known in Aberdeenshire with Touch's. Cadots/Cado's are new to me now (because I was loading a Cabot-like surname), and they happen to have the Coat of Planes-branch Platters (Norfolk with Catch's/Ketch's) in colors reversed, which recalls that English Plate's (Lancashire with Chucks/Suchs and Banesters) share the scallops of Catch's/Ketch's!!! This all comes from personal data on Chuck Luksa!
Plus, I re-STAINed the banister and the spindles while Spindle's share a grape vine with German Platters/Plate's. The laurel branches in the Kitten/Keaton Crest are shared with Luksa-like Lucks' who in turn share the greyhound heads of Church's, which now goes to the pant STAIN of Lorraine (my girlfriend in my 20s), for not only do Lorraine's have a laurel branch, but I saw her pant stain at her place on Church street. Beside's, the greyhound heads under discussion are black, the colors of the courant greyhound of Palmers (Norfolk with Steins) sharing the double fesses of Stains.
Lorraine's are first known in Northumberland with Stain- and Stein-branch Stevensons/Steinsons, with the Perrins having the Kitten/Keaton leopard faces in colors reversed, and with the Baileys sharing the brown boar head in Crest with Kittens/Keatons. While Keiths/Keath Catti, and the Fortune's in the Cheater/Chater motto, are both first known in East Lothian with Vaux's/Vance's, English Stevensons/Steinsons are first known in Essex with the Faux's sharing the Lucks mascle. Perins are first known in Lorraine province.
I think this now gets amazing because I was wondering how Hawks/Hauks might point to Fort HUAChuca along with Chucks. Hawks/Hauks (Hampshire with Posts) have "purple pilgrim's STAVES" while Purple's/PurPUls are first known in Norfolk with "stave"-using PILgrims while Pools/Pulls share the Post Coat while Pool-beloved Pollets are first known in Somerset with English Pile's while Stevensons/Steinsons are also Stave's!!! Chuck Luksa took us here with his hockey career, and Hauk-like Hockeys are first known in Essex with the other Stevensons/Steinsons! The Posts are in this paragraph as per the Pillar-Post which Chuck co-owned with me, and Pillars list French Pile's. Pollets look related to Bailey-branch Baliols. German Hauks have the Coat of French Louis' (Lorraine) in other colors.
German Polhs have a giant "buffalo" head in the colors and format of the bull head of Lux's/Luch's/Lukarts while Lockharts are first known in Lanarkshire with the fetterlock-using Locks sharing a Lick variation with Lucks'.
Plus, to nail this down further, the Strike's in the Hawk/Hauk motto not only share the Bane/Bean lion, but are first known in Lancashire with Chucks/Suchs and Banisters.
I had read that the Keith Catti named Caithness, and so lookie here as per the Bain variation of Bane's/Beans: "The Bains (or Baynes) are a notable sept of the Scottish Clan Mackay, originating from John Bain Mackay (John Ban), a 15th-century descendant of a Mackay chief, who adopted 'Bain' (Gaelic for 'fair' [ignore this off-the-wall derivation]) as his surname after a Clan Mackay feud, moving to Caithness" (square brackets mine). The Mackays list Caws/McCoys, and so Sassys and/or Chuck Luksa and/or the fence post can also be a pointer to Rob and Mikey McCoy of Turning Point. Mackay-branch Mikeys/Mitchys are first known in Aberdeenshire with Scottish BANNers and Bane's/Bains (share Mikey/Mitchy lion).
The interesting thing is that Class'/KLASSens use a "banner" held by "Lady Fortune," and while Scottish Fortune's are first known in East Lothian with Keiths, and while Sassy- and Bane-connectable Cattans are first known in Norfolk with cat-using Keats, Chuck's business partner, Frank KLEES, was a third partner in the Pillar-Post. The six pale bars of Klees'/Clays' are in colors reversed with Athels, the latter first known in Perthshire with the Keith-branch Kettle's. Claysons/Clasons are in Fortuna colors and format.
I have heraldic evidence that Banners were Bohemians, and then German Franks are first known in Bohemia. Frank Klees. English Franks happen to have a "hawk" for a potential pointer to Huachuca! Plus, Bohemian-suspect Baumgartners (East Prussia with Banners) use a "fence", and the Pillar-Post is a fence post! Plus, Jewish Baumgardners share the fleur-de-lys of German Banners (and Plains/Plane's/Platters). It now recalls that Fens'/Venns (Devon with Phones'/Fauns) are suspect with the Phoenix's/Fenwicks while Chuck played for the Phoenix Roadrunners. I re-FINIShed the banister when receiving Sassy, and Fiens/FINIS' (share Bone/Bohum lion) are in the colors and format of Fiens/Fane's/Phone's. Jewish and French Baums look related to Pasi's/Pace's, first known in Bologna, a city founded by the proto-Bohemian Boii. Pasi-branch Packs are first known in Sussex with Bone's/Bohums. Fawns are first known in Berwickshire with Luksa-like Lucks'. Pasi-branch Paisleys are first known in Renfrewshire with the Pollocks (and Pasi-related Spears) sharing the saltire of English Franks.
Ahh, Bohemia is where German Rice's are first known that share "pilgrim's staves" with Hawks/Hauks!!! We just saw a hawk with English Franks just before getting to the Phoenix's. Pilgrims are first known in Norfolk with Phoenix-connectable Hips'/Hipperns while Hepburns are first known in Northumberland with Phoenix's/Fenwicks and Stave's/Stevensons. Phoenix's/Fenwicks share the "phoenix" with the Tufts/Tuffs' while the Cado- and Bane-beloved Touch's are Tuffs too. Circle's/Kirkners, suspect in the fence "encircling" a tree of German'/Jewish Baumgartners, are first known in Silesia with the Brocuffs who in turn share the gold "sphinx" with Hips'/Hipperns. Brocuff-branch Brocks are first known in Essex with Stave-branch Stevensons/Steinsons.
On Tuesday, Candace put out the following video concerning Cabot Phillips' shaving off his beard on the night of September 4, yet Liz Wheeler, apparently put to task by Turning Point to debunk the Fort-Huachuca claims, wants to debunk Candace with bearded pictures of Cabot claimed for the 8th, the day he was reportedly seen at a hotel in Fort Huachuca.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qeBDjfu5hbgIt's very interesting that my crow story above about shaving my beard (which I do only to re-grow it every two or three weeks) took us to Ben Shapiro, and Cabot works for him. The false-claim photos of Cabot with his beard unshaved is while he was on Shapiro's show. I'll add that because Cabot-like Cabes'/McAbbe's are first known in Arran, I trace them to Airaines, where Orions/Irons/KENirons (Norfolk again) are first known while Orrins/OREMs are first known in Aberdeenshire with Bane's. Kens are first known in Devon with Sassys/Sauchys while Chucks/Such's are first known in ORMskirk. Orms are first known in Yorkshire with the Schole's/Scayle's sharing the Orrin/Oren Shield, and Scale's share the Capes/Capet scallops. Orne's/Horns are first known both in Hertfordshire with Scale's, and in Middlesex (beside Capes'/Capets), where Abbe-branch Apps'/Abbs/Epps were previously first known.
OH WOW. Hertfordshire is where Childs are first known who share the Road eagle, and so I was going to consider telling that Chuck Luksa played for the Phoenix ROADrunners. I was considering this immediately after writing the paragraph above, and so the Runners (listed with Runacres) were loaded to see that they were first known in Lancashire with Ormskirk. I started to read the Runner/Runacre write-up to see, if by some longshot, Ormskirk is mentioned, and came to this: "...the widow of Richard de Renacres of BICKERstaffe, granted to Hugh le Spencer of ORMSKIRK certain lands which had come to her after the death of her husband." Spencers are first known in Leicestershire with the English Pace's whose purple Shield can take us to the purple pilgrim's staves of Hawks/Hauks. Dutch Bickers love the Spike's (Lancashire with Ormskirk) while English Bickers are first known in Berkshire while Berkshire's share the Spencer Shield.
To justify the Childs in the paragraph above, Merovingian king CHILDeric was the father of CLOVIS his heir, and English Pace's almost have the Coat of Farndons (Cheshire with Clubs/Clobbes') while Clubs/CLOBBES', in Child colors and format, are first known in Farndon of Cheshire. Bohemian Baums look like Pasi kin, and Moravia, which I think was named by Merovingians, is beside Bohemia. Both German Frank surnames are first known in Bohemia, and Frans'/Frantz's are first known in Rhineland with Roads. Moravia and Bohemia together are essentially all of Czechoslovakia, and to my best recollection, Chuck's parents were Czechs. English Franks share the saltire of Pollocks who built a castle in Rothes of Moray, and the latter was called "Moravia" at times. Polish royals had married Bohemian royals.
I think I can turn this topic to Gaza by way of Gaza pointers from Gas' and their Goose kin. It starts with the Philps, first known in Monmouthshire, beside Louis' of Glamorganshire, and near the first known Goffs/Gough's who share the Goose Coat, both in the colors and format of the Goz/Gos stars. However, the latter has the stars on a vertically-split Shield in the colors reversed from the same in the Arms of Monmouthshire, and while Richard Goz was father to Hugh Lupus, earl of nearby Cheshire, the Philps have a giant wolf in colors reversed from the wolf head used by Hugh Lupus, and in the colors of the wolf of Wolfleys/Wolleys, first known in Cheshire with Wolfs/Welfs/Lupus' and Maceys/Mace's. The latter share the gauntlet with Fiens/Phone's/Fane's, first known in Monmouthshire, a branch of Kent's Fiens/Finis'.
Therefore, as Hugh Lupus (uncle of earl Ranulph le Meschin) was a friend of Cheshire's Hamon de Masci of Bagley, the Masci fleur-de-lys could be in the Arms of Monmouthshire. Hamons are first known in Kent with Masons/Massins who are in turn in the colors and format of the other half of the Philp wolf, yet Kent is also where Welsh Phillips' are first known, tending to explain why French Phillips share the Goz/Gos star. This other half is in the colors of the wolves of German Wolfs, and Wolvers have wolf heads in Meschin colors and format. Thus, we have a good pointer here to Louise Phillips, for she was my girlfriend for a time, and my mother was born to Miss Masci. Nobody I know of has asked Erika if she was dating JT Massey in 2015, as the reports are going. Somebody: "Credit to Project Constitution on Twitter who said Erika Kirk & Tyler Massey Were Allegedly ENGAGED — and Shared a DAUGHTER."
In turn, this looks like a super pointer to Cabot Phillips and Erika Kirk together, especially as French Cabots are specifically in the format of, and colors reversed from, the wolf heads of Wolfs/Welfs/Lupus'. Wolvers are not only connectable to Meschins, but to Mussels/Muscels, and the latter are first known in Lincolnshire with same-colored Fish while Cabots use a "chabot (fish)" (brackets not mine). While Cabot-like Cabes' use "salmon," Salome's are first known in Rhineland with German Wolfs. The latter could have Lincolnshire's Prime's in their motto.
Salmon-branch Salemans share the eagle of Ghents, and while Ghent is also "Gaunt," Swans/Sions used the gauntlet. English Gaunts are first known in Kent with Virgins and Welsh Phillips, and the latter's lion is in the Arms of Ghent/Gaunt in colors reversed, along with a "virgin," or, as others call her, a "MAIDen," and then Maids (Cheshire with gauntlet-using Maceys/Mace's) almost have the Monmouth Coat while gauntlet-using Fiens/Fane's are first known in Monmouthshire with Philps. Dutch Gaunts/Ghents share the wavy fesse of Dols, and Dol is in Brittany with the first-known Musys/Mucys sharing the Ghent / Saleman eagle.
The swan of French Phillips now looks immediately connectable to the same of Swans/Sions (possibly pointer to Zionists) because Swans/Sions (LANARKSHIRE) once showed gauntlet gloves. Repeat as per the Pillar-Post connection to Pools/Pole's: "German Polhs have a giant "buffalo" head in the colors and format of the bull head of Lux's/Luch's/Lukarts while Lockharts are first known in Lanarkshire with the fetterlock-using Locks sharing a Lick variation with Lucks'." Bulls/Bule's are first known in Somerset with Pool-beloved Pollets, and the Bull/Bule bull heads are in the colors of the boar heads of Lockharts, and in the colors of the Goff/Gough and Goose boars. Then, while Candace thinks the maroon shirts were military operatives (at Charlie's faked killing), Marone's (Mar/More colors and format) have the same boar heads.
The Lux's have: "The surname Lux was first found in the village of GEISlingen, where HANS Lux..." German, goose-using Gas' are first known near the first-known Hahns (Mecklenburg with Trumps) who are in turn in Trump colors and format). German GEIS'/Geese's have a giant hand while Hands/Hanns can get us to Hahn-branch German Hanns. Dutch Geese's are listed with Goes'. Donald Trump is thought to descend (by others) from Drumpf's, and German Drummonds (Trump colors) are first known in Hamburg with German Gas'. Marone's and Mars/More's can take us to Morays sharing the Goz/Gos stars, in colors reversed with Josys (Haddingtonshire with Keith Catti!), first known beside the FAIRholm's of Midlothian.
Joselyns ("Faire" motto term) have a "wreath with four hawks BELLs," and Hawks/Hauks can be a pointer to Huachuca along with CHUCK Luksa. Make of it all what you wish. Joselyns have a "falcon LEG" in Crest while Leggs, first known in Dumfries with Bells, almost have the Trump Coat. Josh's/Gose's share the falcon with Joselyns, and can be a pointer to Josh Hammer, a Jew on the Turning-Point team. Hammer-branch Hams share the "salmon" of Cabot-like Cabes'. Salmons (French Cabot format) are first known in Cumberland with Fairholm-branch Fairs, Hames', and with Hammer-beloved Dolphins. Hams are also Hamas-like Hams'.
Joselyn's share the "wreath" with English Burghs (Hampshire with JOSephs), suspect from John de Burgo, father of Herluin de CONTEville who's daughter, Emma, married Richard Goz and birthed Hugh Lupus. The latter first came to topic with Phillips-branch Philps. The Wreath surname looks related to the Washingtons (Durham with CONTE's) who in turn descend from Wassa's/GAZE's. Wreath's and Washingtons share the Chief of English Blacks while Scottish Blacks have a "lux" motto term. Both Black Coats have the Goslin/Gosling crescent in colors reversed, and both Black surnames are first known in Lincolnshire with the Eagle's in the Goslin/Gosling Crest. The latter surname now jibes with the Lux's of GEISLINGen.
Oh wow, just remembered that German Pole's/Pohls use a "frying pan", which could be part-code for the Frien variation of Frants/Friends, and so that can be a pointer to Erika Frantzve Kirk. Frants/Friends are in Goslin/Gosling colors and format. Lux's are the ones sharing the Coat of Pohls/Pohlmans. Pans are listed with Payens/Pagans, first known in Dauphine with goose-using French Gas!!! The latter (ignoring their Chief) are in Trump and Hahn colors and format, and Geis'/Geese's are the ones with a giant hand in the colors and format of the goose-using German Gas'. Hahns and Hanns share the rooster (different colors) with the Galli's (Dauphine) who share the Chief of the French Gas'. English Galleys are first known in Yorkshire with English Gas'.
I'll repeat here that the Welsh Phillips love the Patria's who share the Trump stag head.
Keep in mind, if you think there's anything to these heraldic links, that God is hinting at what He's personally doing for exposing the things we, or the world in general, or angels, need to know in the lead-up to Armageddon. He's not using heraldic links just for our fun and entertainment. I don't think he's pointing to things just to report the news; it makes more sense that He's telling us what He himself is doing. Not precisely what He's doing, but He's hinting that the wins we are seeing has Him involved in working them out. On the other hand, He may be showing / warning us that evil lurks dangerously in attack mode.
Turning Point News Updates
Cabot Phillips has offered the Internet, but not directly to Candace, an alibi for both September 8 and 9, but Candace is not yet accepting it unless he texts her the meta-data that can prove or disprove the authenticity of the camera dates he claims upon his alibi video(s).
In a still-shot that Mr. Phillips presented as an alibi for the early evening of September 8th, he's at a store buying balloons, and he's holding the balloons. Houseofnames may have wrongly listed Balloons with Baalhams/Ballams/Balans (Baliol colors), for the Baloons/Ballons make more sense, especially as they share the giant lion of Welsh Phillips' and English Balls. French Balls share the giant ermine with Balas'/Bailiss' (Glamorganshire, Wales). If God intended to point to Cabot Phillips with this paragraph's heraldic set, why would He do so if he's innocent? If he's innocent, it's not a story.
The Baloon/Ballon write-up: "In 1207 John de Balun paid a fine for the lands of Hameline, on behalf of his father, to Geoffrey Fitz-Ace and Agnes, his wife." Ace's/Ass' use "balances," and there is a Balance/Balancor surname. While the write-up tells that Hamelin de Baalun was ancestral to Balluns of Wiltshire, that's beside the Beautys sharing the English Hamelin Coat. Wiltshire is where Bullis'/Bulliards are first known, and then French Billiards/Billets are first known at/near Le Mans, where the Baloon/Ballon write-up claims a Balon location.
Beautys are first known in Dorset with the Palins sharing the Baloon/Ballon and Ball lions. Dorset is where Babe's were previously first known while Cabot's balloons are said to be for celebrating his new baby, though it's odd because the baby is still in the womb. Babe's are now first known in Suffolk with Blois' and Balloons/Baalhams! Aside from the pellets of Balloons/Baalhams, they are in the colors and format of French Ferrands/Ferrents! Babwells (Sussex with Pellets and Hamelin-like Hams and Hammers) share the Coat of Liss' possibly in the BaiLISS variation of Balas'. Hams and Hammers are in the colors of Dutch Hamels/Hamelins.
I suggest starting the video below at five minutes, where you will see three individuals looking Egyptian / Arabic. The video owner does painful over-kill on the images of concern for more than 90 minutes, so I'll give you the video times of concern. These clips are not new, and it's likely that others have already pointed out the Egyptian look of the men, and their ages well past college age. We can see mics on some shirts, which makes no sense unless they are part of the fakery team. This footage shows no blood anywhere, and the first blood we ever saw was introduced by the fake snake, Paramount Tactical, who probably introduced doctored images on behalf of the plotters.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=biAiX78RgZsAt 16:12 above, we see a close-up of an Egyptian- or Israeli-like character wearing a maroon shirt, a mic on his shirt, and the typical sunglasses worn by the entire Turning-Point team as if the leader of the plot insisted they all wear them to conceal their identities to some degree. At 16:23, a guy with lighter skin has what looks like a mic, who I think is part of Turning-Point security. If it's not a mic, what else could it be? And why would the Egyptian-looking men be part of the security team. See that? It can explain why the Egyptian-military planes follow Turning Point around, but why would Turning Point use security from Egyptian military? It makes no sense unless it involves Israel.
There's nothing new shown after about 18 minutes, in case you want to spare yourself the waste of time. The most-suspicious thing I can see is the numbers of security people for an event that usually goes without incident, yet, on this day, the security was beefed up because it was the day of the faked murder, and the many were needed to assure that students wouldn't spoil the simple script, which was simply to get Charlie into the vehicle, to not allow the medical people on the scene to handle Charlie, and to drive off. The men under discussion are running past Charlie in the vehicle, toward the tent, and so we cam assume they were to safeguard the "crime scene" from outsiders. However, I don't remember anyone pointing out these men near the tent from after-rifle-shot footage of that area. Where did these dark-skinned men go, and what were they doing? If they are typical security, why were they way behind the tent to begin with, as if the team didn't want to show Arabic-looking men at the theater location?
The video below is not good news if the Utah prosecution team, and/or the FBI, wish to slyly switch from a solid bullet to a frangible one (breaks to metal bits upon contact) in order to explain how Charlie's neck bone stopped the bullet. In this video, a frangible bullet goes through solid steak bone, much stronger than a human neck bone, and then takes a chunk of concrete block off after exiting from the meat and bone. Therefore, the prosecution has no way to explain how Charlie's neck shows no exit wound, if the bullet was shot from Tyler Robinson's rifle. It means that, thanks to the court case, the whole world will now know, with more certainty, like 100-percent, that Kash Patel and many others are fraudulent criminals deserving of jail time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6jXxN9JJmkCandace said that she didn't ask Erika, at their sit-down, about Romanian Angels because she, Candace, didn't follow that story. I'm thinking that Candace didn't investigate the story, or at least didn't report her findings / opinions, because she's been trying not to rub against Erika too hard, especially on questionable things. This could soon change, for Candace has now gone past the point of rebelling against Erika's demand to "stop," and moreover Candace has shown openness to the presence of Erika at Fort Huachuca. It's very likely that she was at the fort to secretly get the latest progress report on the staged killing. The video (from a couple of weeks ago) below has Candace answering questions about the sit-down:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sMaSro0yFDwThere's a lot on the video below about Cabot Phillips, who's now being marked as the potential killer of Charlie Kirk along with Erika. This video implies that she and Cabot never ended their relationship, even when she was with Charlie. I've suggested the possibility that she and Charlie were never married, but faked it for Intelligence purposes. They may have lived in the same house at times, but one or two of her children seem not to be Charlie's.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXMMV2bJFTgOn Friday's Baron Coleman show, he finds that Erika's private plane was at the Los-Angeles airport a couple of hours within Brian Harpole's flight, on September 7, the day before Mitch claims he saw her at Huachuca.
ZOWIE, TriggerSmart has hit some paydirt. Unafraid of thinking outside the box, nor afraid of pondering any reasonable conspiracy theory, TriggerSmart looked into the psy-op functions of Fort Huachuca, and bingo, he found a psy-op specialist on the board of Turning Point, "Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely." A military or Intelligence "psy-op" can be defined as staging events for brainwashing / propagandizing purposes:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7UgM-X0y7YVallely was working together with Michael A. Aquino, and so it's interesting that Aquino's incorporate the Coat, in colors reversed, of the Israeli surname, both surnames first known in Venice. I recognize the Vallelys/Verrellys as using a form of the Very/Verrer Coat, and as Vallelys/Verrellys share the patee crosses of Peks, first known in Essex with Wire-branch Vere's/Vairs, it's perhaps a pointer to the Daily Wire, for Dailys can be sharing the split-colored Aquino lion, but see also the split Reines and Pisa lions because Raines' are first known in Essex too, where Aquino-like Quints were formerly first known.
Verys/Verrers (look related to Drops/Trope's) are first known in Norfolk with Luce's, Drops/Trupe's, and with the Quintana-beloved Dice. Pisa is beside Lucca, and Luce's are said to have been lords of Dice. Quintana's, first known in Messina (location of PATTI) with the Massena's who share the Vallely/Verrelly PATEE crosses, are in the colors and format of the Vallely/Verrelly patee crosses. The Drop/Trupe Chief is shared by Ferrand-connectable Tulls/Tolle's/Tollets, from Tullia of Clermont-Ferrand, a pointed, I think, to Erika and Kent Frantzve because my river-flood dream , which pointed to Dan Flood (buddy/partner of Brian Harpole), was deciphered as a pointer to the ICE, of the Homeland-Security agency that Erika's mother belongs to, which operates at Huachuca, and then Tulls/Tullia's are first known in Dauphine with Vallely/Verrelly-like Valerys/Valliers.
The only thing I failed to mention from the river-flood dream, in the the 3rd update of last month, is that the dream ended with my stooping into a red TOOLbox. It just so happens that Tools share the Tull/Tollet and Drop/Trupe lion. Here's from the 3rd update in November, 2022: "After walking up to the four-way intersection, the dream ended with me at a red tool box at one of the [street] corners...Tools are like the Tully variation of Floods..." That four-way intersection had a TRAFFIC light that I've since deciphered as border trafficking. I was walking up the hill (toward the traffic lights) with ice under my feet. "ICE" is an immigration and customs overseer.
There was a flood of water over the ice, about knee deep, which could depict the flood of illegal immigration under Biden, yet there is also Dan Flood to consider now, if the show fits.
A psy-op program is a DECEPTION MACHINE intended to deceive the people, by the military that the people own. The military laughs if the people think they own it. Trump is responsible to snuff out all psy-op programs, if indeed he's the president of the people, yet he keeps war-hawk friends, and loves the military, feeds it raw meat. The military clamp is around the neck of the people, and only God can defeat this thing, and is, I assume, weakening it by exposing it until sufficient numbers of people rise up to identify the corruptocrats and the gangster-brass. Trump deceived the people; he never intended to fight this thing. Anyone conducting staged, psy-op operations is an enemy of the people, and could be deemed part of a terrorist organization in the sense that the military is acting as a hostile agency to the point of grossly punishing anyone seeking to expose and afflict it.
At 22:00 of the video above, Paul Vallely is shown with Paul PACKER of Turning Point. It was earlier today, as I write here on Friday, that I was surprised to hear a woodPECKER banging away at a tree trunk. I don't recall woodpeckers in this area at this cold time. It was, at it's warmest, -18 F degrees today. Peckers are listed with Packers. Amazingly, Pauls have crosslets in the colors of the fitchee crosslets of Woods. WOODpecker. PAUL Packer.
Pauls share the crosslets of Belly-beloved Carpenters (share Belly motto), and "PAX in bello" is the motto of Osburns who are in the write-up of Verys/Verrers along with the Albini's. Albini's are first known in Modena with Morinis', and the latter are in the write-up of Deerings, both descended from Osberts. OsBURNs are listed with Osberts, and they share the cross of English BRUNs, first known in Middlesex with Fiers/Fears. I'll remind that the patee crosses of Vallelys/Verrellys are those of Peks/PECKs (Essex with Fier- and Wire-branch Vere's/Vairs).
I almost missed it: Bellys are first known in Moray with Scottish PICARds!!! Peckers/Packers are also Pickers. Almost missed it: Woods share the fitchees of Picks/Pix's!
OSberts take us to the Oswell surnames both looking related to Wood symbols, and it just so happens that we can get a pointer to Comet Ping Pong pizza here via the "savage" (Wood symbol too) of Scottish Oswells having a "dexter hand POINTing to a gold comet..." The "acuta" motto term of Carpenters and Bellys could get us to MontaCUTE's (Somerset with hand-pointing POINTs/Pointers and Os-beloved Bulls) because they share the lozenges of Reno's and Ping/Pong-branch Pincs. Albini-branch Albins are first known in neighboring Devon with Pincons. Montacute's (Somerset with Borders) share the black border with Parrs who in turn share the double fesses, in colors reversed, of Morinis'.
The Paul Packer in the photo in TriggerSmart's video looks like the same, Jewish Paul Packard whom Trump appointed chairman (2017-2022) of the United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad. "Abroad" could signal money laundering. "...Packer has been a staunch advocate against antisemitism and Holocaust denial. He was also a co-chair of the Trump campaign's Jewish Leadership Coalition fundraising group" (google AI).
Aquino's named Aquino near Naples, and while Erika Kirk ran Romanian Angels (orphanage) accused of trafficking Ukrainian children, there is both a Ukraine Roman surname, and an Italian Roman/Romania surname first known in Naples and having the Ukraine flag in colors reversed. As Aquino's share triple-red bends with Dutch Foss', the Romans/Romania's look related to split Shield of English Foss' (share fox with Voss') while Voss' and first known in Pomerania with Trumps who are in turn in the colors and format of the giant Roman/Romania wolf, but also in the colors and format of Aquila's, first known near Naples too. FOSSa is beside L'Aquila. Aquino's could therefore be using the Irish Fox lion. Masci's are first known in Piedmont with Fossano.
My Masci-line mother was born in PICenze, seven miles from L'Aquila (Abruzzo capital), and I've read that Picenze had a woodpecker symbol. I heard a woodpecker earlier today, and while mythical Mars had a woodpecker symbol, Marsi peoples lived in Abruzzo. My mother's first name is, Angela. The Marsi had a snake goddess, ANGitia.
I loaded Valls as per "Vallely," and up came the split Romania Shield and a white wolf head in Crest, the color of the Romania wolf. Valls are listed with English Walls. The put a white wolf in a crown, similar to pegasus in a crown of English Angels, both in their respective Crests.
Louise Phillips is a pointer to Erika Kirk and Cabot Phillips, and then while Louise (thin and tall) worked at Pennington's clothing, Penningtons (Lancashire with Cave's) share the lozenges of English Angels (Lancashire, beside Masseys) who in turn probably share the Massey PEGaSUS. The Italian Sheaves'/Chiava's, first known in L'Aquila, can take us to English Sheaves', first known in Berkshire with Peckers/Packers and SUSans. Chiava-like Ceva, home of LUIS of Ceva, has a Cevetta river, and Cavetts are first known in Picardy with French Picards. Susans love the Lilys, first known in Worcestershire with Pattys, and then the triple patee crosses of Vallelys are in Lily colors and format.
German Angels share the blue key with Sheaves'/Chiava's, and look a little related to the Foss Coat. Chives' are first known in Tarves while Italian Angels are first known in Tarvisium with Frantz-connectable Vita's. The Frantzve's ran Romanian Angels, registered as an ORPHANage, and Orphans/Arpens have a vertically-split Shield in the colors of the horizontally-split Romania Shield. Orphans/Arpens share "Vincit" with English Sheaves'. Chivasso is not far from Ceva, and French Picards share the giant Orphan/Arpen lion. Luis of Ceva birthed Alis of Saluzzo, and Alis' have the two-word motto of Orphans/Arpens in reverse. Alis married the Arundels of Sussex, where Foss' are first known. Arundels are named after Arun (Sussex), and Jewish Aarons/Arens share the quadrants of German Angels.
I was in my basement and had to take a leak, so I went through the door to the outside, and pee'd in the SNOW (pointer to Mitch Snow?), which is when I heard the woodpecker thumping on the tree. Urine's/Hurins share the leopard face of Babe's and Peak-like Beaks, and Peaks (Suffolk with Babe's) share patee crosses with Peks/Pecks, but in Beak leopard-face colors. Urine-like Orions/Irons can be a pointer to Erika's father's job with Israel's Iron Dome, for Dome's/Dume's, suspect in the "dum" terms buried in the Orne/Horn motto, share the heron with Huron-branch Orne's/Horns, the latter first known partly in Hertfordshire with Beach's/Bechs and Scale's. Schools/Scayle's (Yorkshire with Beach-branch Beckers) share the lozengy Shield of Orine's/Orems, and Charlie faked his death at an Orem school.
Cabot Phillips is shown in the video above posting "Pizza talk is the new pillow talk," unmistakable pedophile terminology. If you haven't noticed, but I'm sure you have, Erika was very promiscuous as a teen and into her 20s.
I heard Baron Coleman say that he thinks the balloon photo of Cabot Phillips is "old," and is thus a faked alibi. Baron should do a detailed segment on that topic because it's a very-big deal if it was faked.
Here's the leaked phone call between Paramount tactical and Mitch Snow, where Paramount acts like he's not trying to destroy Mitch's reputation when in fact he and Valhalla both have that mission. Mitch says in this call that he tried to get his story on Valhalla's show, but was snubbed. It tells you all you need to know about he and Paramount, government-cozy operatives spying on truthers by getting cozy with them too. Neither of the duo intended to give Mitch's story any credibility. Mitch talked too much to Paramount the spy, too much because the latter is looking for any false statement to portray him publicly as unreliable:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ul7VbifSybMThroughout the near-one-hour portion of the phone call, Paramount did not ask Mitch about what he thinks he saw at Huachuca, indicating that Paramount doesn't care to know. He was trying to get Mitch loose-and-friendly (not hard) by acting like his in-common buddy. How many podcasters are like that with how many people? "I'm here to be your biggest advocate," Paramount tells him after about 45 minutes. SNAKE.
It seems that Paramount calls him back (55th minute of video) apologetically to make his case against Candace. I assume that, in the first call, Mitch didn't know that Paramount was a strong advocate of the government narrative i.e. Tyler Robinson done it. And so Mitch was maybe texting him to find more on what he thinks, for Mitch is probably starting to realize that Paramount played him in the first call. While texting, Paramount calls him, assuring him he's been "transparent," but Mitch tells him that he can now see where he's coming from.
Paramount then says that Candace Owens is a foreign spy (1hr2min). Paramount tells Mitch that he's a government-wary individual, same as how he portrays himself to his podcast audience, yet he's clearly a government agent on the issue of the Kirk shooting, and ditto on the faked Trump assassination.
Paramount tells some spurious facts that could be government fabrications, such as the 30-6 bullet that killed Martin Luther King, to support his theory that Tyler Robinson is the killer. In his apologetics, Paramount is trying to make his audience believe that there could have been something wrong with the one-bullet-only that Tyler reportedly shot, to explain why the bullet did not exit Charlie's neck. People are stupid enough to believe in Godless evolution, so impossible, and so why can't they be made to believe in a bullet tumbling in the air that slows down enough to remain in Charlie's neck? Ya-but, Paramount, stupid, the bullet is not the only thing that denies Tyler as the shooter. Ya-but, stupid, what about the theory that Tyler's a decoy / patsy, why's that not your option? Ya-but, beast, why did you jump onto, and cling with claws dug in, to the FBI narrative when there's a million times more chances that the bullet didn't tumble in the air?
Besides, a tumbling bullet isn't likely to go straight, isn't expected to hit Charlie if the rifle is aimed at him from 140 yards.
Mitch is being very kind to Paramount, when you think about it. He talks more than Paramount wants him to, interrupts him, but he never gets fed up with Paramount. He doesn't get rude or mean, probably because Mitch was intending to publicize the call, which he did, to Paramount's ire. Again, in the second call, Paramount does not urge or compel the topic to what Mitch claims about Huachuca, because Paramount doesn't want to know anything about it. See that? PARAMOUNT FAKE talks like he wants the truth. If he was truly after truth, he would be asking, "did you really see Erika? Did you really see Harpole? Tell me more about it."
In the second phone call, we hear a bird in the background, and Mitch says it's his MACAW. Caws are listed with McCoys, first known in Cambridgeshire with Muscats, a branch of MITCH's/Muschats. Caws/McCoys were a potential Turning-Point topic in three crow events (at my place) I shared in November and December updates.
The video below has found a Rothschild marriage to Rothsteins at the turn of the 20th century, but has not yet found how that particular Rothstein family is related to Erika Kirk's cousin, Nicole Rothstein. Plus, so far, nobody's found how Nicole is Erika's cousin. In this picture, we could imagine that Rothschilians are gunning to make Erika the wife of the next American president. Note that Vance's/Vaux's share the bend-with-stars of Solomons/Salome's, the latter first known in Rhineland with the first Rothschild banker (Mayer Bauer), and with the Frans'/Frantz's. It just so happens that the father of Erika Frantzve was the brother of Karla Solomon. The latter was born a Frantzve and married a Solomon surname. The video below explains as best it can.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ou6HdVl94qQPausing at 35 seconds, we see Abraham Elijah Rothstein in marriage to Esther Mary Rothschild. At houseofnames for the Rothstein/Roddenstein/Rothchild (not "Rothschild") page, we find no Rothsteins in the write-up. Instead, it has:
The surname Rothstein was first found in Speyer, a city in Rhineland-Palatinate region of Germany. Here Hartmut zum Rotenschite or Rotschilt was recorded in 1313. At about the same time, the name Rotscilt was registered in Lubeck, a city in Northern Germany in 1338.The famed Rothschild banking family were originally from Frankfurt. Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1744-1812), a court factor to the German Landgraves of Hesse-Kassel in the Free City of Frankfurtt, Holy Roman Empire, established his banking business in the 1760s. His five sons established [bank] businesses in London, Paris, Frankfurt, Vienna, and Naples.
There we see that Rothschilds pre-dated by centuries Mayer Amschel Bauer, and so if we ask why he changed his surname to "Rothschild," I assume he was a Rothschild somewhere in his immediate ancestry. I've been mentioning Louise Phillips and Christine Peare as pointed to Erika Kirk, and so while Peare's are listed with Pearls, note in the video above that Rose Pearlstein (born 1822) was the mother of Abraham Elijah Rothstein above. The video doesn't tell right away why it focuses on the latter's son, Arnold Rothstein, shortly after 35 seconds, but he's into criminal play in the 11th minute.
Erika says that Allan Rothstein is her uncle, and if he's a first uncle, doesn't that mean that her mother was born, Miss Rothstein? Yes, if her father was Kent Frantzve. But Erika claims that her mother is not a Rothstein. I did some of this ancestry in the 3rd update of last month; it interested, see "Rothstein" there.
Allan Rothstein, gangster, can be seen at 4:00 in the video above, sitting beside Erika in her mid 20s. Karla Frantzve's husband (Jack Solomon) is shown, at 8:10, as the president of Club Brigham Young University, a casino owner, super Israel supporter and as well Patron of Ohr Chadash Orphanage in Israel, and a 32-degree Mason to boot. Keep in mind that, if her father was a Rothstein, he may not have been Kent Frantzve (works for Israeli military). This same Jack Solomon was a board member for the New Center of Jewish Studies at Utah Valley State University, i.e. where Kirk faked his death.
Here's the spoiling of text-posting / podcasting in combination with robots that should both be illegal. Or podcasters must by law inform viewers that their messages are third-party paid "advertisements." Rothschilds and other Jewish corps have a lot of money for paying off podcasters:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoqxBavonzA
Vatican Facade
Here could be a large part of the reason that Protestant churches in canada are powerless in fighting the anti-Christian, political machine: they are not staying close to God.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wK38CCGP3sYOr, what good is it to leave the Protestant churches for fear of their money-grubbing wolves if we then go to a dragon-infested vatican "church"? Why not serve Jesus alone rather than do something that STUPID? Or start your on home church. It is provably wrong that Christians should believe that they must belong to an over-arching church organization. It clearly is proven wrong with vaticanism and with wayward, heretical Protestant denominationalism. Therefore, the only thing needed is the one-on-one between a Christian and the Spirit of God, in which case the True Church consists of these true believers wherever they are. It's often called the "invisible church" to denote no denomination. A true believer is one accepted by God.
If I could expand of Jesus' words where he said that the religious leaders were condemning themselves by wanting to be Bible experts but refusing to come to the Messiah central in their Bible, I would say that catholic evangelists having all the correct New-Testament doctrines in the bag doesn't serve as some sort of magic to make true believers of catholics if they refuse to come to Jesus from their hearts because they prefer to pray to Mary or some other saint, or because they feel that attending mass is all that's required to please Jesus.
How completely stupid was my mother to pray to Mary that she would in turn pray to Jesus on her behalf? I often told her and my father to pray directly to Jesus, but, when my father was in his late 80s, he would show off to me how he had become a rosary man, so sickening because he was missing the mark. It's as though some sort of blindness kept my parents ignorant of the simplicity and all-sufficiency of adoring, and speaking directly to. God / Jesus, perhaps because they feared Jesus, or perhaps because they were unwilling to admit their sins to Him. Jesus will therefore hold the vaticanite clergy and evangelists responsible for keeping their people in ignorance. Jesus said that we should direct our prayers, in His name, to the Father.
catholics today are being dishonest by trying to hide the vatican past. Corrections are being made, but this doesn't make me happy at all because they should be disconnecting with vaticanite clergy as well as making the corrections. By remaining in this system, they are showing no proper disgust of heresy and hypocrisy at the highest levels. Why risk the dubious hope being a catholic stooge when you can have God the Coach right in your own heart, powerful to restore us from the defilements of our specific sins? So long as we remain concerned about His concerns, He will not abandon us.
Confessing sins to a priest is a solid testament to the ignorance of the typical catholic stooge. Armies of stupid people the world over have the catholics been. You don't only confess your sin, and you don't only confess your sin to God, but you look at it square in the face to see how STUPID it is. Shame should accompany confession, which is why I say that confessing is not enough. If God through your conscience convicts you of your stupidity, do you then take the confession to another sinner, the priest who doesn't respect Jesus enough to forbid himself from calling himself a "priest." How utterly stupid can catholics be? Why would anyone want to join this clown show of fools who, instead of admitting the past heresies and sins of popes, would rather hide them from the next generation with more of the same-old-same-old facades?
It doesn't get the vatican more member$ to confess that popes sold salvation for money, or sold priestly offices to the highest bidders, for this spoils the facade that the vatican is the historical church of Jesus. If popes can be so doggedly wicked, as so many of them have been, how can anyone claim today that this institution has been the holy church of God? HOLY FACADE, the robes and ritualism don't fool true Christians at all. And that's why we are perplexed when modern catholics speak Biblical yet honor this gigantic cult? I see snakes using Bible quotes to lure people into this "holy" trap. Imagine, using the food of God as trap bait. Sam Shamoun is one of the biggest trappers on behalf of the vatican on youtube.
I made the mistake of loading three of his vodeos, and now youtube gives me 15 more every time I refresh the homepage, and probably for the next couple of weeks without giving me the ability to block his videos. Shamoun is a PRICK with a good knowledge of the Bible. He's the kind of goof who will justify venerating icons and statues of the saints, contradicting the second commandment forbidding the making of statues of anything. Nobody should look at a painting of Jesus, let alone fall in love with it, because it's not the true expression of Jesus. A catholic stooge with an expertise in Bible passages is a prick who will drain you dry of common sense with double-speak. Veneration is not worship, he will double-speak. My mother had a dozen pictures of Mary all over the house. That's not veneration, it's stupidity that the vatican prick, and Shamoun, are responsible for. To my mother, pictures of Mary were a substitute for the pagan rabbit's foot.
If a Christian wants to have more freedom to do worldly things while not feeling guilty for it, he/she should join a vatican church. Therein are the hypocrites who despise Christians just because they don't acknowledge a hill in Rome as the capital of the true church. Once they are in a vatican church, the pricks no longer need to concern themselves with Biblical matters. They can feel safe in salvation by all the vatican smoke-and-mirrors. The best definition of "prick" is "Judas Iscariot," partner with the hypocritical priests.
Justin Peters uses 15 minutes of things you may already know to make a snake out of the following catholic bishop, but at about that time, you will hear the bishop say that Ben Shapiro can be saved by obeying the law of God apart from Jesus:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uoiuc2v9KgoShouldn't the pope fire the bishop above on the spot? Yes. But popes don't fire their heretics, not even their pedophiles.
At the end of the 21st minute, the bishop says that our consciences are Jesus Himself, which is of course not always true. But even if a person is hearing from Jesus in their conscience, Who tells them to correct something, it doesn't make up for the Gospel requirement of being born again by faith in Jesus.
Once we are born again, that's when we try to obey God's laws out of love for God. Jesus died to show us that God is CONCERNED for us, that we should not be led by pessimism, or the reports of the unGodly, to believe that, being infinitely greater than us, much larger than an elephant versus a mite, God therefore cares almost nothing for us. God would not demand that His Son die for us, and the Son would not die for us, if God didn't care for our lives. This is the Message of the Cross: God really does care for us more than anything else in the Creation. And when God demands that we love Him, it's because He wants to love us. It's because it's hard to love someone who hates you for no just reasons.
I'm not going to say that people who jump the obedience bar as far as, say 40-percent, or 80-percent, are the ones God chooses for salvation. The one who uses foul language habitually, but apologizes to God when it slips out, is doing far better than the one using less foul language but doesn't care what God thinks about it. The thief on the cross showed heart toward Jesus, appreciation for Him, while the other thief mocked. See any difference? The one who appreciates Jesus will try to honor his words, but Ben Shapiro rejects and mocks Jesus while claiming to obey God's commandments. See any difference?
If I had two apartments for two tenants for sharing my house with me. One of them shows genuine affinity for my Christianity, and promises to abide by the contract. The other tenant hates me but promises to abide by the contract, to keep the rules of the tenancy. The latter moves in, and he does in fact keep all the rules, and even greets me in the morning when he sees me, but he hates me all the while, it's obvious, and doesn't want to sit down with me for even a coffee. Why should I want a tenant like that to my own harm? It troubles me that I'm hated in my own house. Ditto for God and His Kingdom. Shapiro cannot get in as long as He hates Jesus, for as long as he refuses to "sup" with Jesus in prayer.
Just think of what idiots atheists and Jews are who would praise scientists ti the skies for their feats but reject the Creator of cell factories in the human body, or the Programmer of biological growth from a mere egg. Shame will be their lot, but how do catholics excuse their loyalty to a heretical vatican while claiming loyalty to Jesus? I have sense enough not to attend the church of a money-grubbing Benny Hinn, but how do catholics excuse themselves for not recognizing age-old vatican heresies as enmity with Jesus? How is it that they can graft themselves to the vatican tree of deception, not recognizing that it's not the Church of Jesus?
I do not subscribe to the idea of Justin Peters and many others when they talk about Paul saying that salvation is not by works. They misunderstand Paul when he said that Grace is no longer Grace if salvation is by works. Paul meant that the attempt to acquire salvation by works ALONE is what slanders Grace. He was not saying that works should not be attempted once Grace has been received, for that would not only be stupid, but would violate several sentences spoken by Jesus highlighting the need for obedience. Jesus was not talking about the need for obedience PRIOR to being born again, but after being born again, duh. The one who loves Jesus must also TRY and WANT to be obedient. The one who tries because he wants to will be saved even though he commits more sins than the one who doesn't give a damn about anything that Jesus said. The one who comes to Jesus for salvation for the first time must be wanting to, at that very moment, to go the way of Jesus' righteousness.
This part of my conversation is irrelevant if by "works" Paul was talking about temple-related works. I'm not addressing those works, and those who tend to get offended by Grace and Works working together do not mean to say temple-related works either.
The one who thinks he's saved just because he attends catholic masses is missing the mark. You need to fix yourself to Jesus, and afterward you are expected by God to remain fixed to the Vine. It's not even complicated. Stop assaulting Works, Protestants, by raising Grace way above Works. They go together like triplet sisters along with Confession. They all have Repentance as their surname. Grace is the work of God; repentance is the work of man. Works: get yourself out of the bars; stop chasing sex, stop your drugs, stop partaking with those who despise Jesus, love (be open-hearted to) your brothers and sisters in Jesus, give to those in need, stop all malice, and commune with God because you love Him from your heart. What advocate of Grace alone would dare say otherwise?
Become Apostolic as per the original apostles. Get familiar with how they shaped the Christian lifestyle. It's just basic good versus evil, and cleanliness versus dirtiness. The Gentiles are still the dirt, still the pork meat, and Jesus is the Kosher. Jesus is the raider, the thief, the predator who steals dirty Gentiles when they show signs of wanting to become kosher. He unlocks their prison doors and lets them go free from the dirtbags, the rulers of the Gentiles. God loves a dirty, filthy heart that wants to be cleansed. That's Grace. The Holy Spirit gives pure water, no mud in it at all. God urges us in many ways toward purity, and we need to exercise loyalty and patience, the feet and legs of the triplet sisters above. "Patience" is defined as "don't go backward," and "loyalty" is defined as "keep trudging." The object of Faith is "to conquer." The definition of Christian joy is "on the peak."
If you've ever said that God was chasing you prior to your becoming a Christian, it's not like you can out run God. Rather than chasing you, he was tripping you from behind, with a counter in his hand, wondering how many times he'll need to trip you before you turn around and apologize to His face. This is how God treats those He loves. God might have so much fun with us in our twisting and turning, but we shouldn't think that our terrible behavior isn't making Him feel sick. The sooner we straighten out, the sooner we get peace. Don't resist. Turn around and give God an embrace, let Him take you by the hand and soar up with you.
Fix Your Teeth
This doctor below has convinced me to try xylitol (birch-tree sugar) to get rid of mouth bacteria that causes plaque. She says she hasn't had a teeth cleaning in 40 years. If you do your kids and yourself, you could save a lot of money on cavities. The cost of the xylitol per several months will be about as much as one scraping per several months at your dentist, but this material will prevent cavities too. However, you need to be wary of dentists who fabricate cavities that don't exist. A tooth filled that doesn't need filling is at a greater risk of forming a bacterial cavity, sooner or later. If xylitol prevents plaque, you should get zero cavities. She says that a month's use of this product will eliminate all the bacteria, in all your mouth, that cause plaque. Sounds good to me. What will it hurt to try it? It can heal your gum bleeding, if you have any.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPdPz8nAuwUIn another of her videos: "Since my introduction to Xylitol in Xlear nasal spray and Xellies, i have seen such a great reduction in the number of colds I get. And when I do get one, its gone in days instead of weeks or months. No decay in my teeth either. what a miracle this has been for me. God bless you Dr. Phillips! Many thanks!" Some use it as a mouthwash (spit it out after swishing). Some say they drink birch-tree sap.
"I'm absolutely sold on xylitol! I've been using it throughout the day for the past five months, and my teeth look fantastic — no plaque, no bad breath in the morning. Plus, the sensitivity in one tooth that I had for years is completely gone! I can enjoy smooth, white teeth with xylitol, proper brushing technique,..." It's starting to sound as though the medical establishment, dentists, do not want us taking xylitol, those rats.
I floss every two days, and hate it. I rinse twice daily with hydrogen peroxide, which keeps plaque down very much, and I scrape my own minimal plaque off with the tip of the thin parsing knife (kitchen type). But when I put lemon and/or apple cider in my tea, I start to notice a little pain in a rear molar, which I think is from the lemon / cider eroding the tooth enamel. I then switch to orange juice in my teas, and do lemon / cider only half the time. That rear molar has a small bacterial problem even with regular flossing. So, to hopefully eliminate 75-percent of the flossing, and to heal the molar, I'm taking this advice: "I have been on Dr Ellie's [xylitol] program for over 13 months now. I have not flossed since starting. I have not seen a dentist. My teeth are whiter, and my gums are in better condition, even though my gums were not too bad to begin with..." You still need to brush teeth once or twice a day (after last meal of the day if only once).
More: "The bad bacteria in your mouth can causes yellowing of the tongue and teeth- this is waste products of these bacteria. After three days of using xylitol my tongue was pink again and it has never been that way!" If all these things are true, then the medical profession has kept us in the dark for $$$. DIRTY RATS!
Xylitol can be used as a sugar substitute for coffee and tea. Plus, "No Blood Sugar Spike: Doesn't raise blood sugar or insulin levels, good for keto and diabetic diets." It sounds too good to be true. DIRTY DIRTY RATS. By the way, "xylitol is not the usual or main ingredient in most general artificial sweeteners."
The drawback: it's much more expensive than sugar. Xylitol is available in a white, crystalline powder or granular form that looks and pours much like regular sugar. So, use half sugar, half xylitol, for each coffee, and do teeth treatment three times a day on top. I'm going to do it. Amazon has it for $6 per pound in small 5-pound quantity, which is about 12 cups or powder. It has an indefinite shelf life, and so why not order in bulk once you know it works for you?
Look at the DIRTY DIRTY DIRTY RATS: "Why do dentists not recommend xylitol? Xylitol helps fight cavities, but not as well as fluoride. Xylitol may increase your risk of heart disease, but fluoride would almost certainly increase your risk even more. The best oral hygiene products should not kill bacteria but nourish the natural balance of beneficial bacteria in the oral microbiome. Jul 4, 2025" The risk of heart disease sounds like a dirty scare tactic because dentists can't find problems with xylitol. Plus, the doctor in the video above says that xylitol kills only the bad bacteria while making the good ones thrive. Dentists don't want to draw that picture, obviously, if this product puts them out of business.
I use no toothpaste. I brush with the peroxide before bed, and leave it unbrushed in the morning for roughly a minute. It must be spit out, absolutely do not swallow. I floss with some peroxide in the mouth before brushing, but peroxide kills both the bad and good bacteria. I think it's a big deal that I use a hard-bristle brush every other day because it gets deeper and harsher between teeth. I think dentists want us to use a soft brush only, because it doesn't do as good a job. I brush the inner cheeks and top of the tongue because the bad bacteria probably hunker down in those spots. I kill most of the problem nightly, and it's working for me. Just passing this onto you so that you will still have teeth into your 70s. I've learned from experience that at least three dentists are corrupt in my area, very much like car mechanics that sabotage car parts while installing parts you don't need.
One guy suggests 15 minutes of swishing xylitol with five grams (a teaspoon) of crystals, no water added, but others say two or three grams in a three-minute swish three times daily. I can handle that. So long as the plaque bacteria are reduced in numbers daily, it looks like a win eventually. In case you don't read it elsewhere, this substance can kill a dog if it eats even one dose (it does nothing to other animals aside from ferrets).
This Rothschild family might just be behind the obscenities we saw in the courts as per the attempted disclosures on election fraud.
Rothsteins/Roddensteins/Rothchilds show a RothenMALER variation, and are in the format of Mails/Meoles' (Cheshire with Malls). The latter's lion heads are colors reversed from English Rothes' who in turn share the Mail/Meoles bend. Malls have the "Malbancs" in their write-up while Malbanks (Northumberland with Roddens) share the ermined bend of Roddens, in the colors and format of the bendwise arrow of Rothsteins/Roddensteins/Rothschilds, and also in the colors of the Jewish Rot/Rothchild bend. German Mallers are first known partly in Bavaria with Bauers and German Rothes'/Rothschilds.
English Mallers, first known in Devon with Meoles-like Mules', have "green nettles" while "needle"-using Pettys share the quadrants in the Arms of Rothschild. Needle's/Nadlers share the Coat of Hesse's/Hessels while Hazels/Hessels are first known in Devon with English Mallers. The first Rothschild banker was in Hesse-Cassel of the Chatti Germanics, and the Keith Catti are first known in East Lothian with the Solomon-connectable Vance's/Vaux's. Needle's are first known in Shropshire, where English Rothes' and Sleeps were both previously first known, and Sleeps along with LAWyers/Layards have the double fesses of Mules' in colors reversed.
Natts/Nathans, suspect with naming Nathan, the first son of Mayer Bauer-Rothschild, are first known in Rhineland with Lawyers/Layards, and with the Solomons/Salome's who share the bend-with-stars of Vance's/Vaux's and Laws. The latter are first known in Northumberland with Stein-branch Stevensons/Stave's, and then Dutch Steins have the eight-pointed stars of Rothsteins/Roddensteins in colors reversed while the Goats in the Coat of German Steins are first known in Nottinghamshire with the Nations/Nathans. Salmon-branch Salemans are first known in Surrey with the Biss' sharing the double snakes of Nettle's.
Mules' are first known in Devon with Goat-beloved Moline's, and with Molsons/Mulsons who can be linked to the Simple's (same place as Eschyna de Molle), first known in Renfrewshire with the first-known Speyers expected in Speyer, Germany, where Rothsteins/Roddensteins/Rothchilds are first known. Speyer-branch Spree's, with the Simple's in their motto, are first known in Cornwall with Urine's/Hurins while Orions/Irons/KENirons love the Moline's (Devon with Kenns). Eschyna de Molle married the line of Rodden-connectable Crooks (Rodden colors and format).
Here's a short history of a 20th-century pentecostal cult:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3hNU6pL2SoHere's a Bible-reading catholic who preaches on obedience to God as critical, yet ignores that he's evangelizing for the biggest hypocritical, heretic monster ever, the vatican "church". These catholic Bible readers are those who spit out a gnat but swallow a camel. This guy can't be as stupid as he presents himself, and so what motivates him to say what he does, using Protestant language that the vatican denied their people for CENTURIES. All of a sudden, we are seeing vatican evangelists talking the Bible-talk of Protestants, and defecating on Protestants at the same time. Expect more such self-wasted / faking Christians in podcastland as satan sees that his time is short:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDsqEtirnsAThere's not anywhere near the claimed number of catholics. There are a fantastic number of Orthodox Christians in eastern and southern Europe who barely get familiar with their own Bibles. With Bibles so ample these days, how can a person who cares not to read about Jesus be the sort of Christian that the guy above portrays? It's fakery. True Christians get very families with all of the New Testament, and get a good grasp also of the Old-Testament background to the New Covenant. If many catholics left the vaticanite churches for Protestant churches only to continue ignoring the Bible, by all means, go back to the vatican churches and be dead there.
NEWS
By the way, if you want to watch good youtube shorts when you have nothing to do, you need to load some Christian video first, for a time, and then you will get slews of Christian shorts, and probably more if you watch them. Otherwise, youtube will feed you worldly-pride and worldly-sewer. Don't watch AI productions unless you want more fakery.
Democracy in the New Syria has turned rabid, a lot like what we could expect from wicked spirits if we are drawing close to the last seven years. We could be seeing the first steps to a new leader arising in Syria:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uzIDydf4lEoIt must have been very important to Trump to have Netanyahu visit his Florida home over the Christmas break. It's to no surprise that Trump wants to ramp up the Gaza "peace" process, but the staller, Netanyahu, has the winning hand because even Trump had to agree that the process cannot go forward until Hamas is disarmed. So, that's the next sting on the to-do list, and my take is that Netanyahu is seeking to stall until Trump is gone, but Trump has noticed it, and has therefore summoned Netanyahu to Florida to get him to stop with the stall tactics, and to get Netanyahu to commit to a deadline date for succeeding in the task. And, of course, Netanyahu wants more American money in order to do it, and still more to handle the new threats in Syria. This is one big snore, in the sense of same-old same-old, until the murderous enemies of Israel can get a break-through for their hopes. That breach arrives when God puts a hole in His hedge around Israel, but, first, the king of the north needs to defeat the king of the south, causing more Muslim enemies of Israel to be attracted to him like a magnet.
Here's how Israel is menacing Turkey:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRu0KC63hHgTovia Singer is reserving for himself a most-bitter place in Hell for his crusade against Jesus. I caught wind of this snake telling the world that Jesus hypocritically said that in no way would He refuse the approach of anyone to the salvation He offers. Tovia then slams Jesus by pointing out his other sayings where God rejects some professing Christians whose righteousness is insufficient. But there is no contradiction. Jesus does not send anyone away who wants salvation, but if they fail to please God by accepting too much sin, God rejects them. Thus, it's not Jesus sending them away, but the Christians themselves who fall away. Righteousness had much to do with merely rejecting sinful activities.
God lives to make a people like Himself who can be communal in His kingdom, and thus He's a servant of these people, providing the Kingdom for them, or everything the Kingdom needs on their behalf. In this way, by providing needs and gifts, He is a literal Father. How does God make people a little like Himself? By calling them. By calling them to be as He is, as Jesus does and thinks, though not everyone who is called will be saved, because some will become one of the three seeds in the parable of the four seeds. They will come to Jesus for the salvation, or for whatever else they think they can get from God, but they eventually fall away for one reason or another. Some fall away because they find a "freedom" from God's ways, concluding that His ways are too hard or too stuffy (not wild enough) or too systematic as per a systematic church, or whatever.
Christians are to be "stuffy" because this world is not our environment who wait for the Kingdom instead. We cannot be happy in this world as we reject sinners and have no part with them, for they then reject us. This is not what God had in mind for us, but we are to SUFFER through this world because God chose to allow it in spite of our becoming saved within it. Suffering this thing does get STUFFY. It chokes us, because that's what weeds do to the wheat. But woe if we want to become free again as wild-living / promiscuous weeds, after we have tasted what God has in store for those who make it to the end of this life. Hang in there, do what you need to do to hang in there, don't fight back against the activist weeds with evil, but expose them even to their faces in front of their fellow weeds.
God is loving to those who love Him, but rejects those who reject Him on behalf of those who love Him, for we cannot live happily in the same community as those who reject God. Love for God or others can be defined as acceptance and loyalty. Unwilling / grudging obedience is legalism, lip service, but trying to obey, and especially wanting to conform, is not legalism, but rather loyalty, and inevitably love for God's ways. Some people who love God's ways can love their old man more, eventually, and then fall away to various degrees. We should let God proclaim our salvation, not our own lips. Yes, we are saved if we are in the Spirit of Jesus, but, the question is, are we in the Spirit of Jesus? The one most confident of it may be the one most in trouble.
In your most-private moments, ask God: how much do I really love you? Your conscience, as you ask and meditate, will give you some of the answers. In order to hide Himself from us, God speaks through the conscience (we can't tell His voice from ours). He balances the witness of the Holy Spirit in our hearts with hiding Himself. I suppose that one reason He must hide Himself is to keep us from become legalistic, obeying only because we fear Him. Jesus in our hearts makes us love in such a way as to drive out fear, and I suppose that this works better if we do not see Him, for he is VERY BIG AND STRONG, frightfully so when He stands beside our sinfulness. We don't have sins alone, but we tend toward a sinful nature in the sense that out righteousness is like filthy rags. It's going to take time to whiten them.
Fear of God goes to filthy rags, but peace goes to white robes. If we want the peace and love of God, we've got to keep trying; those who say that trying is legalism are in error. When Jesus said that we should store rewards in Heaven, he meant that we should do the work of TRYING. To carry our cross daily is the work of TRYING and WANTING. Practice makes perfect. "Go and sin no more" requires TRYING, WORK. The Christian seed in rich soil has make-up-his-mindedness. I've made up my mind, I'm going God's way, I'm determined, I'll never go back to what I was.
There is no great burden to resist the bar life if you have no desire for it any longer. You don't need to try hard when you do not desire something against the law of God. At this point, wanting Jesus is what's important, for the person who wants the Grace is the person God is after. He gave Jesus to us that we might want and appreciate the Grace.
Resistance is work, a fight. Fight against the weeds, flick dirt into their faces when they tempt you, and maybe Jesus will give you a match stick when the time finally arrives to burn the weeds. Hate the meanest, activist weeds, but "love" them by doing them no wrong. Correcting them to their faces is throwing flames into their faces, like throwing pearls to the swine. But, there is no wrong done when correcting them, and so we have this weapon by which to satisfy ourselves in the midst of their seeking to take Jesus out of us. Tovia, loser, you've been corrected by many, which is more love for you than you deserve.
Coming to Jesus because you've decided through logic that he was resurrected, and because you like what He says, is not the same as coming to Jesus in love for His Grace. The latter needs the Spirit in your soul; the former is just a mental decision. The success story is in begging God for His Spirit to be in you. Then you will have the peace that transcends understanding, and the love for the Gift you have been granted.
In the prophet Daniel, chapter 11, we come to a "holy covenant" that the "king of the north" opposes. Daniel frames this covenant as the anti-Christ's arch nemesis/ My take is that Daniel is referring to the promise God made to Abraham, to make his bloodline supreme in the earth, which Old-Testament prophecy times at Armageddon. That is, the end of this world is the beginning to the Promise, and the anti-Christ, filled with the spirit of satan, will seek to spoil this Promise by desolating Israel, trying to remove her from th map.
And so let's look at a Trumpian covenant: "The Abraham Accords are a series of U.S.-brokered normalization agreements signed in 2020 between Israel and several Arab nations (UAE, Bahrain, Morocco, Sudan), establishing diplomatic ties, trade, and security cooperation, named for Abraham, a shared patriarch of Judaism and Islam, aiming for regional peace and economic growth, though their full impact on the broader Palestinian-Israeli conflict remains debated." Is this the "holy covenant" of Daniel 11? I don't think so.
Look at how google AI infests itself into Biblical topics, denying the true interpretation of Daniel 11:21-31:
In Daniel 11, the "holy covenant" refers to God's covenant with Israel, and the chapter describes a powerful ruler (historically Antiochus IV Epiphanes, and foreshadowing an end-times figure) who rises against it, showing hatred, desecrating the temple, and seducing people away from God's law, while true believers remain strong and stand firm in their faith.No, google, the king of the north in Daniel 11:21-31 is not Antiochus IV as much as it's the end-time anti-Christ. Antiochus was able to act as a partial fulfillment for Bible readers previous to Jesus, but Jesus made it plain (in Matthew 24) that the "abomination of desolation" will take place at the time of Armageddon. Does google know this? Yes, but google is a snake that would leave you deceived. Tovia Singer and google go hand-in-hand in Hell for knowingly violating the messages of Jesus. And pre-tribulationist Christians rebel against, and twist, the very same passage in Matthew 24, not by dating the abomination in the time of Antiochus, but by claiming it doesn't touch upon the Church of Jesus, and doesn't pertain to a post-tribulation rapture.
Confusion is everywhere online, and youtube is a great contributor of it in Biblical matters. We need to keep sharp, to know the enemies, to keep away from those Christians who routinely, willfully, and blindly support Trump politics even to this day for fear that Democrats will get the White House back. Jesus doesn't give us such an option. Americans can give Republicans their votes if they think it best, but we are not permitted by God to ignore, or cover for, their snake skins. If Trump is a fraud in certain regards, say so, don't fight with MAGAites as if he were not. You can pray for Trump to become more honest, a better man, but you can't hide his political sins against the people or speak as if he's a boon to the country when in fact he's a slippery slope to its destruction by his feeding the wolves.
The Abrahamic Accords, sponsored by Trump in 2020, are an attempt to spread the acceptance of Israel by all Muslim nations, which in effect builds a bloc in opposition to anti-Israeli Muslims. Dandy, good, but this is not God's covenant with Abraham, which is fulfilled by installing Jesus as the king of Israel, in Jerusalem, who will probably cancel the American embassy from that city. The Muslim nations, in the Abrahamic Accords, did not sign on to Jesus' rule over the Middle-East. Trump did not ask God what he thinks of his plan$ for Ga$a, did not ask God for permission to apply those plot$.
Daniel 11:30, at the brink of the desolation of Israel: "Then [the king of the north] will turn back and vent his fury against the holy covenant. He will return and show favor to those who forsake the holy covenant." He's going to try to change the position of Muslim nations / peoples which accept the right of Israel's existence. It begs such questions as to whether Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson will support the anti-Christ in his war against Israel. However, at this time, these two people insist that their only opposition to Israel is its hard-handed persecution of Gazans.
Trump has good reason to "partner" with Israel against Iran because Trump wants Hamas without weapons. Israel, however, wants Hamas to retain weapons, so ironic. There is therefore a question as to whether the uprising within Iran against it's Muslim government has been foisted by the CIA. Trump has sounded his military backing to the rebels, which promises a civil war imminently.
If Trump goes into Iran with military after two Iranian protesters are killed, on behalf of his Gaza project, he'll condemn himself in the eyes of God for being so slow and feeble against the Nigerian government after thousands of Christians were slaughtered. And then there is Israel's killing of Gazan Christians.
Here's Marjorie criticizing the DOGE effort as a Trump scam, except that this is AI. How can Marjorie not threaten to sue the podcaster for putting words in her mouth? How can the world have fake news / fake political commentary like this without a law to stop it? Why does youtube allow podcasters to make money on fakery unless youtube is complicit because it too makes money? What kind of an irresponsible morality is being standardized for this generation? What sort of devolution would grip the generation after this one? I've seen three videos, this week alone, with a fake Marjorie from this one youtube channel
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpdfvbbnlQsI'm not going to antagonize on Christians who support modern Israel if they think it's their sacred duty to God, but if the Christian below starts to lie against Candace, accusing that Candace despises Jews broadly when Candace has not shown such hate, then that Christian looks guilty of something, perhaps of taking money to say what she's saying:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/LxSa5uuSwScI think it's good for Christians to be part of political discourse, but it's our main job to expose corruption in both major parties, because corruption is sin. God commands political ministers to act sinless; who would disagree? Yet Turning Point is in bed with the war hawks. By now, we should have seen Trump and his Intelligence people asking Erika if she was at Huachuca. The very fact that we have not heard of it pits Trump and his war-hawk buddies in with the Kirk cover-up, and yet some Christians will maintain their allegiance of Christian nationalism, a Christo-political union that turns a blind eye to the non-Christian elements in MAGA. This is not the sort of political involvement that God likes to see for us.
Trump comes out as a hypocrite again for claiming that drugs are the motive for his war-hawk invasion of Venezuela. In that case, he should go after Mexico's government too, and a host of many others in the American sphere. As John Ratcliffe at the CIA has been involved in Maduro's capture, he has a responsibility to catch drug distributors inside the United States that are supported by Intelligence camps. Why have we not seen it?
Trump this week hinted that he'll go after Cuba next, a clue that he's listening to the war hawks...who probably want canada's water and tar sands too. The problem is, the war hawks are terribly sinful, installing puppet governments after throwing "dictators" out but only to impoverish the peoples of those countries by moving American intere$ts into it, seizing their wealth for the benefit of their own billionaires. This is what Trump means by "MAGA," to make billionaires richer. And this is the sin of Trump in Venezuela, he's not fooling anyone.
Trump has had several years in the White House to rid the country of the Muslim Brotherhood that Obama infested into its politics. What's the hold-up?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ojp-xf3l4rwWouldn't it be something if Candace's supporters discover that Fort Huachuca is still bringing drugs into the country, just as Trump is glorifying the abduction of Maduro on the basis of drug trafficking? Wouldn't it be telling if Trump did nothing about the drug traffickers at Huachuca, once exposed? That is exactly what I think would happen, NOTHING. Trump is portraying the Mexican president as a sweet-little thing having no choice but to let the drug cartels run her country. He's the one who installed the sweet-little Bondi to do NOTHING but give a token show of fulfilling his campaign promises.
NEXT UPDATEHere's all four Gospels wrapped into one story.
For Some Prophetic Proof for Jesus as the Predicted Son of God.
Also, you might like this related video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3EjmxJYHvM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efl7EpwmYUs