Even before the time of Jesus, Israelites knew their Messianic prophecies. When one turns to them for a read, the impression is never given that anyone but Jesus fulfills them. I don't know of any detail in those prophecies that rules Jesus out. The New Testament book of Hebrews gives excellent confirmation that even the Old Testament claims that Jesus is God Himself.

Paul calls him a "reproduction" of God, which works out to be the same as "begotten son of God," but not a son as we see our own sons, who are only slightly like their fathers, and often develop at odds with their fathers' views and values. Jesus was exactly like His Father. The apostle John grasped the Godhood of Jesus as the Word in a flesh body, which is something we can grasp. It's difficult to envision ALL OF GOD merely in a human body with merely a human brain, but when we think that Jesus' was "controlled" by God such that He was His spokesman, we can grasp that much.

But Jesus was not controlled as one controls a robot. The absence of his Joseph's genes within Jesus' body allowed God to impregnate His own Spirit into Jesus so that the mind and attitude of Jesus are exactly those of the Father. This is the standard belief of true, non-twisted Christians. There are Christians who do twist this Biblical reality.

There are Christian Zionists who may be surprised by the news this week that religious Jews hate Christian presence in Israel. Those very same religious Jews whom Zionist Christians adore for their zeal to rebuild the temple are no true friends of the Zionists. The Bible gives us no business to embrace non-Christian Jews who hate us, who portray us as wackos and blasphemers for claiming that Jesus is literally God.

A couple of weeks ago, I watched a video trying to equate Israel's attacks on Iranian allies as fulfilled prophecy from Zechariah. However, Zechariah, in his latter chapters, speaks on Israel's military clean-up of the land for AFTER Armageddon, not now. Therefore, I won't say that what Israel is now doing militarily is by the will of God. It's possible that Israel's current aggressiveness is launching her into God's "great tribulation."

Here's from Zechariah; note how the first verse seemingly alludes to the final Restoration of Israel, after Israel acknowledge's God. However, we find Tyre to be wealthy in verse 3, which cannot be modern Tyre, for it was nothing to speak of prior to 1948, and was then bombed multiple times after 1980:

The burden of the Word of YHWH against Hadrach, and Damascus its resting place when the eye of man and all the tribes of Israel are toward YHWH, and also Hamath borders on it [Hadrach?]; though Tyre and Sidon are very wise. And Tyre shall build a fortress for herself, and shall pile up the silver like dust, and gold like the mud of the streets...

After telling of Tyre's destruction by the hand of God, the prophecy goes on to tell of Gaza's destruction, but it seems not to be of the end times, unless the end times are after Tyre becomes gold-ridden. Verse 7 complicates things by the use of "remnant," which, later in Zechariah, pertains to a remnant of Israel after Armageddon. Verse 7: "And the remnant will even be for our God, and like a chief in Judah, and like a Jebusite in Ekron." One could get the impression that the remnant is Israelite, and yet the text to that point is talking about the destruction of the Gaza theater, which includes Ekron. So, maybe, the remnant pertains to Gazan survivors in ancient times, such that we should not view this prophecy as God backing the modern wipe-out of Gaza, nor the recent Israeli bombings in Damascus.

Then, in verse 9, we are at roughly 30 AD, yet verse 10 cuts instantly to post-Armageddon Jesus without indicating it to the reader. The only way to glean that jump of 2,000 years or more is by living after the time of Jesus, but also by knowing prophecy on the return of Jesus:

Rejoice greatly, O Zion! Shout, O Jerusalem! Your King is coming to you! He is righteous and victorious, humble and riding on a donkey. And I will cut off the chariot from Ephraim [Israel], and the horse from Jerusalem. And the bow of war will be cut off, but He will speak peace to the nations, and His dominion will be from sea to sea, and from the [Jordan] River to the ends of the land/earth.

Obviously, God can't speak, in Zechariah's time, of end-time warfare using "tanks" and "war jets" or "machine guns." Therefore the horses, chariots and bows are not literal. From verse 11 onward to the end of chapter 9, God tells that He will give Israel military supremacy in order to establish the kingdom of Israel for Jesus. It tells of Israelites celebrating that Restoration, but it's not described with great empire as men see empire. Instead, we find that God only doubles what Israel had prior to Armageddon, and that the people will be happy with grain and "new wine."

Is God being stingy? What's to celebrate about cereals and grape juice? Let me tell you. This Israel deserves death, and the Remnant will know it once it sees Jesus with its own eyes. This Israeli remnant will be happy with bread and water, after the "great tribulation" of Israel. But to have the fields filled with produce and rains, which is the implication, will be a bonanza. Plus, lest this remnant become entrapped by luxury, God will keep things merely wholesome, the way life should be, not the way Trump likes to live, you see, but down-to-earth good. A little work, a little pleasure, a little toil, a little laughter. People will make shoes again for the joy of the customers, not as modern money-grubbers do purely for getting rich.

The first order of the day, when Jesus is upon the Israeli throne, is to bring repentance, a simpler life worthy of God, throughout the world. Prophecy says that kings will dread Jesus, shut their mouths because of Him. His "iron rod" will be a necessity to curb all the greed-based turmoil we now see in the world. But the iron rod, like the Law, will be unnecessary when the peoples carry the values of God in their hearts. And these values are not difficult to grasp, not even difficult to live by, so long as greed and selfish ambition don't creep into the soul. The Iron Rod wants to smash that out of people. The Rod will act as a Shepherd's staff to clobber any would-be wolves that come around looking for weak sheep to exploit.

Zechariah 11 seems to be talking about God's abandonment of end-time Israel leading to the invasion f the anti-Christ, though the latter is not mentioned. God will allow Israelites to be abused by their lawless, unconcerned leaders. Sound familiar? Tax them heavily, and scrape off some of the taxes for themselves. As I start off here at verse 3, note how "pride of Jordan" could be for the Muslim Temple Mount that includes the Wailing Wall, which will be invaded by the anti-Christ such that it can't escape totally unscathed. Jordan is the official custodian of the Temple Mount:

A wailing voice of the shepherd [not Jesus], for their splendor is devastated; a voice of the roaring young lions, for the pride of Jordan is destroyed. Thus says YHWH my God. Feed the flock of the slaughter; those who sell them kill them and not held guilty, and those who sell them say, blessed by YHWH, for I am rich, and their shepherds do not have pity upon them. For, I will not have pity on the inhabitants of the land, says YHWH. But, lo, I will make the men fall, each man into his neighbor's hand, and into the king's hand, and they will bruise the land , and I will not deliver out of their hand. So, I fed the flock of the slaughter, even the poor of the flock.

God will decide to abandon the Israelites while feeding them, the very picture we can glean since 1948. He feeds them -- permits their continuation in the land -- only for the slaughter that is their "great tribulation" at the hand of the anti-Christ. I do not think the "king" in the quote above is the anti-Christ, but rather an Israeli leader. God allows the leader(s) to abuse the people, to get rich thereby, same as the leaders in the United States and other Western countries that treat government as a bastion for making competition against the people, or who make the people subservient to government as if the reason for living is for the government parasite, the supreme god, though disguised as a for-the-people shepherd.

Pointers to Comey's FBI

Late in the last update, at the end of the News section, I got into some heraldry on Tulsi Gabbard's two names, showing how it can point to the Steele dossier that's she's now uncovering at the center of crimes against Trump. The Gabbards of Winton then got me again to my hockey goal on Jim McGee. That very same discussion got me onto an Obama dream I had about a month after Obama directed his Intelligence chiefs to fly the Russia hoax against Trump, on January 6, 2017 (not to be confused with Jan. 6, 2021).

You can load Gabbards now, which load on another tab, in order to load other surnames, to better follow the heraldic links.

It's Ms. Gabbard now revealing that Obama conducted that hoax officially starting on January 6, though it had been in the works since the previous summer in an effort to make Trump lose the election. This new effort from January 6 was to get Trump out of the White House, no doubt to make Hillary the president instead.

The Obama dream had me taking a shot on his billiard table, and I talked about that in the last update. As I sewered the "cue ball," which was a paper plane, into a corner POCKET, I looked the Corners up yesterday to check if there could be a pointer to the dossier scam, which this POOL shot pointed to. But before getting to that, note that the giant POCKET/Poucher cinquefoil is in colors reversed with Blanche's, a possible pointer to Todd Blanche, the deputy attorney general for Trump. Gabbard has asked Blanche and Bondi to look into arresting Obama, Comey and Brennan, and others too.

This pool-hall dream, where Obama owned the pool hall with an unspecified other that I've suspected to be Loretta Lynch, may be the reason that the shark swallowing the Trump bulldog was in a KIDNEY-shaped SWIMMING POOL. It can reveal that the shark depicts is Obama Intelligence. Swallows are first known in Lincolnshire with Kidneys/GEDneys who probably have the Ged "pike" fish in colors reversed, and there is a "pike" in the Clapper Crest! Plus, the SWIMINs use "a silver bend charGED three green leaves." It doesn't use "charged" for no reason. There are countless heraldic bends at Hall of Names, but almost none use "charged" for objects shown upon those bends.

As Tulsi Gabbard is going after Clapper and company, it's notable that Swallow-branch Swale's have GILBERT of Gaunt's family at a Swaledale location. The Heeds suspect in the Gilbert motto almost have the Coat of Este's expected in the Swale motto. Dutch Gaunts share the Swale fesse, and Dutch Gaunts share it wavy with Dols because Swallows were Saluzzo's who married Alans of Dol. Gabbards are said to be from "Gilbert," which could be correct because Gaunt-line Guenets, looking very connectable to the Gabbard Coat, are first known in Belgium with Gabberts/Gebels (not "Gabbard").

GilBERTs (Devon with Berts) share the Bert chevron, and both have three white items on them. Bertons are first known in Shropshire with Sallows and Alans. It's possible that the Swale-related heraldry shown here was Arranged to point to Ms. Gabbard's attack on the shark swallowing Trump. Swale's came up in my RIVER-flood dream, which pointed to ICE (immigration and customs), and so note that while Rivers / Revere's (Devon with Gilberts) can be in the Maxwell motto, Maxwells share the two-headed eagle of French Gilberts.

Aside from the roses of Gilberts, they have the Arms of Carrick, wherefore the Gilbert squirrel, "CRACKing a nut," gives away that Cars were a Carrick branch, for Cars are in the colors and format of the Gilbert chevrons-with-roses. Alans of Dol married royal Bruce's in turn descended from Marjory Carrick, which can identify the Gabbard lion as the Bruce lion.

Geds have a "DURat" motto term while Dure's (Perthshire with Comeys/Combs and RATterys) share the Coat of Swallow-branch Saluzzo's. "DuRAT" indicates the Rats/Raids too, I strongly assume, because they are first known in Nairnshire with pike-using Geddes'. Ratterys share the fitchees of Picks/Pix's (Kent with Staple's). Kidneys/Gedneys use fish-in-saltire in the colors of the Nail/Neil saltire while Irish Neils are first known in Tyrone with Sharks. The latter share the trefoils of BarnSTAPLE's and Rods (both in Devon with Pike's and the Rattery location of Hoods), and Barnstaple's are in the colors and format of Swimins and English Stevensons/Steinsons. Hoods have the crescents of Shark-line Saracens in colors reversed.

Scottish Stevensons/Steinsons are also Stave's while Shark-beloved English Crane's use a "staff RAGully", which I see as part-code for Shark-line Saraca's of Ragusa (Croatia). English Stevensons/Steinsons are first known in Essex with the Motts/Morts expected in the "mort" motto term of BarnSTAPLE's. Ragusa-like Raggs' look a little related to the Staple Coat. Trump the bulldog was in the shark's Mott-like mouth and throat. Motts/Morts share the crescent of Sallow-like Slows, and Swallows were a Sallow / Saluzzo branch.

James Comey looks like the shark seeking to ruin Trump years ago. As BARNstaple's are first known in Devon with bear-using Bears/Beers and Combs, and with the Trebys who share the Chief of English Barns, note that German Barns/Berns (bear) have the Coat of English Balcons/BalCOMB/BalCOME's, though the latter have it in the colors of Scottish Balcons/Balcombs/Balcome's.

Variations of Swimins, such as "Schweman," look like they developed from "SHAWman." Shows/Showmans/Schorrs list Schaws, and essentially have the Coat of Shark-like Saracens in other colors. Saracens share the black wolf in Crest with Cluns who in turn share the Saluzzo Coat. The Clun wolf holds the green Shark trefoil, I assume. I had read that the FitzAlans of Arundel, who married Alice of Saluzzo, lived in a Clun location of Shropshire.

Ratterys (Perthshire with Shaws and Cluns) are in the colors and format of Comine-connectable Shaws, and Comine's are first known in Norfolk with Swimin-beloved Leave's, and with Swimin-connectable Steins. The latter are in Swimin format because Swimins were now-obvious kin of Stevensons/Steinsons = linkable to Rodhams. The shark thus appears to be the Obama Intelligence agencies working in unison with Hillary Rodham Clinton to sink Trump illegally with invented accusations. Rodhams share a brown tree stump in Crest with Kidneys/Gedneys, but also share the Swimin / Stevensons/Stave bend so that the swimming pool with shark points to her lunatic machinations. The Kidney/Gedney stump has an "oak branch" while Oaks share the rooted oak tree in Crest with Swallows.

Stein-branch Stains are first known in Middlesex with Horns/Orne's in turn sharing the motto of English Crane's, which includes "Nil," likely for Neils (same place as Crane-beloved Sharks). Stains are said to have married Yarborough's who in turn share the split-Shield colors of English Neals.

Enter Lorraine

Stains were to topic with a pant stain on Lorraine, my date in my 20s. I saw the stain on her pants only as she climbed up the stairs to her BALCONy, and Balcons are listed with BalCOMBs/BalCOME's. Her pants pointed to Pansys/Pantzers without question, first known in Westphalia with Nails/Neils and DUCKs, and sharing the Peace/PAISE doves while English Page's are also PAIGE's. A BAR-le-DUC location in Lorraine province uses pansies in its Arms, and Grails/Neils/Neals were at Barra and ORONsay.

Scottish Barrs are first known in Ayrshire with Scottish Pike's, Clapper-beloved Quarters, and Neilsons/NILsons. Clapps/Clappers, with a pike fish in their "quarter," are first known in Surrey (beside ORNE's/Horns of Middlesex) with early Stains. German Barrs use hunting HORNs, as do CHARs/Charts, first known in Somerset with Clapton, and suspect in the "CHARged" leaves of Swimins. Chars/Charts share the Orne/Horn motto which includes "Nil." Swedish Neilsons share the giant eagle of Doria's while English Doors (share bees with Leave's) are first known in Herefordshire with Saluzzo- and DURE-connectable Barrels. Doria's married Arduinici of ONEGLia, and German Nagle's are listed with Nails/Neils. The Doria eagle is very linkable to the Tromp eagle via Fauci's who in turn share the Irish Nagle lozenge and the split-Tromp Shield colors.

I met Lorraine at her BUS STOP, and Stops/Stubbs are from Stobi, a city, along with AstiBUS, of the Paioni peoples. Page-branch Pagans/Payens are also Paions. Astys, first known in Lorraine-connectable Lanarkshire, share the Lorraine lion. Bus' share the Lanark/LURNack cinquefoil. The Lorne's are in the Lanark/Lurnack write-up, and while Lorraine lived a couple of properties from Lorne ave. and Church st. (Richmond Hill, Ontario), her bus stop was one block over at Lorne and Yonge street. Why should Lorraine point to the page on Obama's billiard table?

Lorne's are first known in Aberdeenshire with Touch's who share a giant and green lion with Astys, and while "Touch" is a motto term of Scottish Comeys/Come's, Irish Comeys (lions COMbattant) have the Asty / Lorraine lion in colors reversed. (Below, I learn that Touch-like MacinTOSH's share the Scottish Comey/Come Coat).

Paioni were also "Paeoni," and English Page's have pheons colors reversed from those of Stops/Stubbs and Coys. The latter are first known in Cambridgeshire with Crails/Crabs, and Scottish Balcons/Balcombs are first known in Crail! (Later in this update, I come to ELLESmere's to find the Page pheons, a potential pointer to Marc Elias.)

Coys are suspect as a pointer to Perkins Coie, a corrupt legal firm at the charge of election fraud that had Marc ELIAS as a lawyer, a direct lawyer of Hillary Clinton who tasked him to bring the Steele dossier to fruition, and then to Comey's / McCabe's FBI. She literally paid for this dossier in a laundered way. Trump was in the shark's MOUTH, and Motts share the crescents of Elias'.

Crabs/Crails share the fleur-de-lys with Stephen-like Stepps/StepTOWs. Touch's are Tows too. Stubb-like Stubbings/STEBBings are first known in Essex with Stevensons/Stephensons/Steinsons.

PANTers/Panders share "spur rowells" with Page-branch Pagans/Payens, and Penders probably have the lion of English Grasse's due to a Pendergrass surname, explaining the grass stain on Lorraine's PANTs. As it apparently points to James Comey due to her balcony, I suppose the flat page on Obama's pool table is James Comey's piece of paper (Steel dossier?) that sewered = failed. I was aiming at a red ball, and Reds/Reeds (Northumberland with Lorraine's and Rodhams) are in the colors and format of Scottish Pike's/Pickens, and apparent pointer to the Clapper Crest.

The vertically-split colors of English Pike's are shared in colors reversed by Dossier's and Trents, the latter first known in Somerset with Payne's and Pool-beloved Pollets. Pools are first known in Dorset with PLAIN-related Palins and Trent-connectable Tarents. The paper PLANE acted as the cue BALL, and English Balls are first known in Cheshire with the Bellows/Ballots who in turn share the Coat of English Billets. French Billets are listed with Billiards. Heraldic billets are with Steele's (Cheshire).

English Billets are first known in Devon with the Page's (Winton Coat in other colors), and the cue ball started as a flat page lying on the pool table. I couldn't shoot it, and so I turned it into a plane before rifling it toward a red ball beside the corner pocket. I missed the ball, shooting the plane straight into the pocket for a sewer that pointed to Barry Soetoro, Obama's previous name.

The style of sword used in the Corner/Garner Coat has a handle design that could be code for a certain surname (which I don't know). Handle's share the Moray Coat while Morays (almost the Duc/LeDuc Coat) have a "pret" motto term, like the "Paratus" motto of Swords.

The same sword style is with Scottish Duns while Obama was born to Anne DUNham, daughter of Miss PAYNE. French Page's are first known in Dauphine with PAGans/PAYENs, you see, but also with French Lamberts who essentially share the Coats of Billiards/Billets and Hillards/Billiards (Surrey with English Lamberts). These heraldic links must be another reason for the cue ball starting off as a paper plane. See Plains in the last update.

It appears that we are to lump Obama in with the flat page, yet the Clintons are in the BILLIARD hall by the fact that Bill Clinton's father was Mr. Billet-like Blythe. Blythe's share the sheaves of Date's/Dade's/Deeds (Norfolk with Dunhams) expected in the DENham motto, and Deins/Deans share the Blythe crescents. Date's/Dade's/Deeds even share the Coat of Clints/Clents while the Clent Hills are in Worcestershire with the first-known, Clinton-connectable Hillarys.

Ahh, I get it: Pansys/Pantzers (Westphalia with Ducks) share the doves of Peace's/Paise's, the latter first known in Orkney with FLATTs!!! The flat PAGE!!! It's true: things-Lorraine-and-I are linking to Obama's pool hall.

Plus, I can trace the "ORGAN PIPES" of Letts/Late's (Gloucestershire with Stephens/Stevens) to LinkLETTERs, first known in Organ-like ORKNey! "Organ pipes" (show as the Arthur "clarions") are with Downtons while Downton is a town of Shropshire. It argues for a Flatt trace to "Flaad," the Alan patriarch. Boughtons were at this Downton location and they have a "DONum" motto term. Bird-branch Bartons (Broxton with Birds/Burds) were at Boughton of Cheshire, where Dons are first known. I met Lorraine (first DATE) on my BIRTHday, and Births/Berts are first known in Devon with the Gabbard-like GilBERTs who have a "Peace" term in their English-version motto.

Moreover, the Berta griffin is with German Steels. See that?

The Pipe's (Staffordshire with Stops/Stubbs, Duce's and Docks) are in Stop/Stubb colors and format. Her pant stain pointed to Duck liners in Bar-le-Duc, and Linkletters share "sheldrake" ducks with SHELdrake's (Essex with Stubbings/Stebbings). Shells are first known in Westphalia with Pansys/Pantzers and Ducks/DOCKers! Lookie there. Payne's are first known in Somerset with Ducks/Dacks sharing the Ducy lion and the Pret / Pike/Picken stars.

The sewer was on the pool TABLE, and Table's almost have the Coat of Shell-like Shalls/Schalls (Rhineland with Salome's). Scale's are first known in Hertfordshire with Beach's who in turn share the vaired Shield of Pike-loving Clappers (Surrey with Salmons / Salemans), and with Childs who share the Lorraine eagles.

I didn't see anything in the Dun Coats that could lend something toward the sewer shot, but Scottish Duns are first known in Angus with Sewers/SHUTErs while Shots/Shute's have swords (different design) in the colors of the Dun sword. This tends to justify looking at the Dun motto, with "MeCUM" motto term that looks like a pointer to Scottish Comeys/Combs/Come's, first known in Perthshire with Comine-connectable Shaws. Comine's are first known in Norfolk with Dunhams/DOMINE's and Fiscs. "DOMINabitur" is a motto term of Comers/Combers.

Comey and crew have become infamous for abusing FISC (secretive FISA court), and then the "astra" motto term of Fiscs (Norfolk with RISE's and Comine's) can go with the "astRIS" of Comers/Combers. Fiscs share the checks of La Marck (see Arms later in this update) and Croatia, and English Marks are first known in Essex with Asters/Esters/ISTERs and Este's. Istria is at Croatia.

Irish Comeys, who look related to the Brennan Coat(s), have "drops of blood" while Drops/Trupe's are first known in Norfolk with Comine's. Scottish Troops/Trupe's are first known in Banffshire with Moch-branch Mucks, which I'll come back to. Drops/Trupe's share the Chief of Tulsi-pointable Tulls/Tolle's (see last update for that heraldic set) who in turn share the "pyramid" with BattiSTELLi's, and in the last update I told that a song by Francesca Battistelli revealed that the cue ball was a pointer to Page's. The drops filling the Shield of Drops/Trupe's fill the Stelling/Still Shield in colors reversed.

Tulls/Tullia's (Dauphine with Pagans/Payens and French Page's/LePage's) have "butterflies" while Butters come up as "Bitar," perhaps in the "dominaBITUR" motto term of Comers/Combers. Drops/Trupe's share black drops with MorCOMBE's.

Angus is also where the Mathyson surname was first known listed with Mathie's/MAGHANs/MEKINs/Manns. Cume's/Cooms/Combs (Devon) are super here to prove a pointer to James Comey because they share the Coat of Irish Maghans/Manns while Megyns are listed with Magee-like Meegins/Meakins, and the latter happen to share a griffin-head-with-wings (different colors) with Corners/Garners, tending to affirm that the sewer in the corner pocket is Intended to get us to Corners, for Meakin-like Mecks/Meeks/Mekie's had been looked up minutes earlier as per the "MECum" motto term of Duns. The Corner/GARNer sword is with Mochs/Muchets (Burgundy with French Saffers), and Mackens are in the colors and format of English Saffers (Devon). Garns/Garners can be sharing the giant Mathie/Maghan/Mekin lion.

The Jungs suspect on the "Jungor" motto term of Mecks/Meeks have a giant stag in the colors of the giant stag of Downs/Douns, tending to prove that "Mecum" is for Mecks/Meeks or their branch. Downs/Douns are first known in Sussex with Mackesys/Margesons, expected as a branch of Margys/Mackeys.

Mecks/Meeks share the McGee/Magee and Meigh boar head, but it's also the one of Tenants who in turn use a "mast" while Masts/Masters look related to the Lears suspect in the "implear" motto term of Mecks/Meeks. French Leirs are then super because they share the Irish Judge/Juge Coat while Mecks/Meeks share the boar head also of Judds/Juggs, what can be a pointer to judges and courts to which Comey or others may soon be committed. Lears (share unicorn with Layers/Leyrs) share a ragully fesse (different colors) with Judds/Juggs, and Leirs are also Layre's while Lawyers are listed with Layards.

The paper plane had become suspect with Bill Clinton's secret meeting with Loretta Lynch (Obama's attorney general) on the TARmac of the Phoenix airport. Macks (Berwickshire with Duns location) almost have the Tarr Shield, and Steve Tarr fed me the pass that allowed me to score on Jim McGee. It was the championship game, which we won, thanks to Tarr's FOUR goals. Fore's/Forez's have the Travers (share white boar head with Judds/Juggs) who almost have the Irish Judge/Juge Coat. Traver-like Trevors, sharing the cockatrice of Machet-branch Muggs, are first known in Herefordshire with Judds/Juggs.

Macks were probably a branch of Maxwells while Much's/Muschats share the Epstein Coat. Mucks almost have the Moch/Muchet Coat. Maxwells share the "holly bush" with Irish Dunns. The latter's motto is sometimes, "Mullach a BOO" while Bo's/Boys/Boeddu's are not only in the colors and format of Irish Duns, but share the same two stars in Chief as DOSS' and Clintons while Hillary Clinton hired Christopher Steele to arrange the fake DOSSier. Stills are listed with Steel-like Stellings, and they share the rose of Swiss Sewers.

Dunbars (look like Grey kin) are said to have been Gospatricks to begin with, who landed at MOCHrum (beside Dumfries). Kilpatricks are first known in Dumfries with Rums. MochRUM. Elias' have: "Helias son of Huctred was granted the lands of DUNdas by Waldef, son of Earl Gospatrick, King of Northumberland in 1180." I think it was after this time that Gospatricks of Mochrum developed. Dunbars and Greys (Northumberland) have the lion of Dundas' (West Lothian with Elias') in colors reversed.

Repeat from above on the Ged motto: "'DuRAT' indicates the Rats/Raids too, I strongly assume, because they are first known in Nairnshire with pike-using Geddes'." Elias' and Elis' (Yorkshire with CLOSE's) share the Rat cross. There is a Geddes page online telling that proto-Geddes Geds were on the Nith river, home also of Kilpatrick castle, at CLOSEburn. The shark was in a kidney-shaped pool, and Kidneys are also GEDneys. The shark appears to include Marc Elias. Later in the shark dream, Mrs. Kilpatrick was on Epstein's island, or so I claim.

Kilpatricks have a "make" motto term and share the saltire of Maxwells (Yorkshire with Bush's), an apparent pointer to Ghislaine Maxwell. Miss Kilpatrick was born to Mr. Hicks (Pentecostal pastor), and so this Maxwell entry into Sleeping Beauty is what makes her look like an Epstein hooker, for Hooks have a blue-version Hicks Coat. Plus, as part of her Christian testimony, Mrs. Kilpatrick claimed that she had been a teen stripper.

Hookers (Norfolk with Patricks, Hyke's/Hake's, Higgs and Brans/Brains and Brantons) have a "deer with a BRANCH in its MOUTH" while Branch's/BRAINch's share the SHERwood Coat (share Sure chevron) while Irish Kilpatricks are also Sheera's. Mouth-like Motts are first known in Essex with Hicks of Low LEIGHton, and while Leightons/Leytons are first known beside Leighs/LEGHs/Leys, Hicksons have giant eagle LEGS. Beauty was HOVERing over the seats of the car, and while Hoovers have a giant eagle leg, Hovers/Hoffers share the Bran/Brain Crest.

Brains/Brans and Brantons/Bramtons, sharing in the Coat of Ducys (Staffordshire with Hicksons and English Docks), are the closest thing I've come to for possibly entering John Brennan to topic, Obama's CIA director now reportedly under FBI investigation for illegally pushing the Russia hoax. The double Brennan lions (look related to Irish Comeys) are in colors reversed with Brantons/Bramtons.

The other Irish Brennans (looking related to Jeans/Jane's) share the giant, blue lion of English Docks. Jeans/Jane's, who were in the dream when I was WALKing to Beauty's car, on the Clapper-pointing BEACH with only my jeans on, are first known in Cornwall with Hicks of St. Ewe. The first-known Hooks were in neighboring Devon with Hykes'/Hacks, and with Kenns while Brennans are first known in KilKENNY with Irish Brians (probably have the Brennan lions). Kennys are first known in Galway with Lynch's. I'll tell below why I think Loretta Lynch is central in the Obama dream. I was shirtless, and Shirts are in Hyke's/Hake / Higgs colors and format.

Here's new proof that Beauty was on Epstein's island. I was walking to her car to WAKE her, and Walkings/Wakelins share the German Epp lion. English Epps/Apps'/Abbs were once said to be first known in Middlesex (near Epping) with Stein-branch Stains, and then we have EPPsteins. Epps/Apps'/Abbs, a branch of Abbe's linkable to McCabe's/McAbbe's, are now said to be first known in Huntingdonshire with Walkings/Wakelins, but also with Engaine's/Gains/Giens suspect in the Bran/Brain motto, "Enghien." Keveneys/GAINeys share the Keven/KEWen, Pool, and Bren/Brin lion, and I took a shot with Obama's POLL CUE while Cue's are listed with KEWS (Norfolk with Brans/Brains and Steins). Kevens/Kewens share the Maxwell motto.

Epps/APPS' are from the APSUS river through FIER county of Albania, explaining why Fiers are first known in Middlesex. Then, there's no other way to put it, that I FIRED the plane into the corner pocket. It was a rocket shot. Apps-branch Abbe's are first known in Angus with Sewers/Shuters. See that? The sewer is pointing to the Epp bloodline, and then while Eppsteins are first known in Hesse-Nassau. Rasmussens, sharing the giant Fire unicorn, are first known in Hesse.

Why is Obama's pool hall, a pointer to Obama, Brennan, Comey, McCabe, and Lynch, connecting with Epstein's island? The sewer into the corner pocket can get us to the Corner variation of Garners, and Garns/Garners share the giant Epp lion. Lynch's are first known in Galway with the Cue-connectable Keveneys/Gaineys. Loretta Lynch became Comey's boss. She must have urged Comey to go along with the Steele-dossier crime against Trump's voters.

One problem I'm having is that while the Mossad is thought to be squarely behind the Epstein crime ring (there should be remnants still in operation), one would think that Mossad would favor pro-Israel Trump rather than anti-Israel Obama. On the other hand, Bill Clinton was an Epstein fink, and Obama was trying to get Hillary into the White House, at least after Trump won the election. Mossad may have been forcing Obama's hand to get Trump impeached. But why, when Trump is pro-Israel? Well, you have warring factions in Israel, leftist liberals verses the Netanyahu government.

Mossad and Blackmail Heraldry

The closest surname I can get to "Mossad" is the Mosts and Mosters/MISTs/Masters. On Obama's table, I MISSED the red ball, and fired the plane into the pocket dead-on. Mosters/Mists/Masters share the white unicorn with Fire's, and almost have the Holder Coat while Eric Holder, a staunch leftist goon, was Obama's first attorney general.

Mosts happen to share the giant Epp lion. Epps/Apps' have a "domine" motto term apparently for Domine's/Dunhams (same place as Hyke's/Hake's and Higgs). Mosts use "domino." Most-connectable Mustans (Yorkshire with Hicks and Mosters/Mists) are in Hyke/Hake and Higgs colors and format. Domino's share the Higgin/Hicken tower. As good as this heraldic set seems, I lament that there's not yet been found a surname more like "Mossad."

Holders (Gloucestershire with Walls) and Mosters/Mists have Coats similar to the English Wall Coat, and the latter's Crest is much like the Moster/Mist Crest. Whalleys/Wallys are first known in Lancashire with Holds/Holts having two of the Holder fesses. Holds/Holts and RATcliffs are first known in Bury while English Burys (Devon with Hooks and Walerans) share the Wall and Hook fleur-de-lys. Rats are expected in the Ged motto while the Whalley/Wallys canton is "charGED" with a mascle. Whalleys/Wallys are in the colors and format of the Beauty bulls, in the color of the Ratcliff and Waleran bull head. John Ratcliffe is now in a perfect position to expose crimes committed by the evil Obama-Brennan-Lynch triplet, but I expect him to expose election-fraud crimes too.

The "Non" motto term of Mosters/Mists is shared by Knees-like Kness' (Perthshire with Comeys) who look like "Knesset." Mossad is an arm of the Israeli Knesset. Knee-branch Needhams are first known in Derbyshire with the Archer-branch Larchers looking related to the Mosters/Mist Crest. The Archer- and Larcher-beloved Dragons are first known in Kent, where Mosters/Mists were once said to be first known. Therefore, when I touched the knee of Sleeping Beauty, it can be a symbol of God's punishment on Mossad, His exposure of the Epstein-Mossad relationship, imminent any time now, judging by the shape of things taking place.

Israel was founded by Rothschilds, a branch of Roets who in turn share a motto term of Mosters/Mists, another reason to view the latter as a pointer to Mossad. Camerons, sharing five, bunched arrows with the Arms of Rothschilds, are in Larcher colors and format, and Larchers show only arrows. Camerons (Angus with Rhodes-connectable Sewers) are also Camera's, suggesting Israeli-globalist spies. Cameron-like Chambre is on the ARC river with MODANE, explaining ARCHers. Arch's/Arks (Berkshire with Modens) are in the colors and format of the Blois dragons, white like the dragon heads of Larchers and Archers. English Chambre's are first known in DENbighshire with English Brians, and as Denbighs look very related to the Coats of Palins and Plains/Platters, it's likely that Brian-connectable Brennans are to be lumped in with the paper airplane.

The NATions/Nathans suspect in the Paper carnations share the red arrow into a heart of Stoltenbergs, and Mr. Stoltenberg, NATO chief, was recently replaced by Mr. RUTTE, a pawn of Klaus Schwab's WEF. Previous to Stoltenberg, the NATO chief was Mr. RasMUSSEN. Mussins/Mustins are almost the Mostyn variation of Mossad-like Mosts, and Mostyn-related Moses' are first known in Shropshire with Rude's while Rudesheim is at Assmannshausen while Rasmussens (incorporate Schwab Coat) are also Assmanns (share white unicorn in Crest with Mosters/Mists.

Another way to point the pool sewer to Mossad is where Moss/Mose's share the gold tower with Scute's/Scutts (Lancashire with Moss'/Mose's). Sewers are also Shuters, and Shute's/Schute's are also Shitts implying an open cesspool sewer. Moss'/Mose's happen to use billets while Billiards are listed with Billets. The "rose" motto term of Moss'/Mose's can get us to German Rose's, first known in Silesia with Sitlers/SCHITners who in turn share the trefoil of English Pike's, first known in Devon with English Billets.

The Mast variation of Mosters/Mists (Yorkshire with Elias-branch Elis') is in the Crest of Tenants, first known in West Lothian with Elias', which can indicate that Marc Elias, or even all of Perkins Coie, was/is controlled by Mossad.

The blue-lion Coat of Brennans is in colors reversed from the giant lion of Brens/BRINs, and the latter are in the colors and format of German Hacks who in turn share the giant unicorn of Giuffre's. Virginia Giuffre, vocal Epstein hooker, killed after being struck with a BUS. Brin-like French Brians (Brittany with Shark-line Sarasins) have the Gofer saltire in colors reversed. Are we making a Brennan pointer to Virginia Giuffre? I fully expect Brennan to have been in cahoots with Epstein operations targeting Republican politicians. Trump knew too much of Epstein operations, which can explain why Brennan and company all attempted to oust him from the White House. They scared the pants off of the novice president such that he dared not go against the deep state. But, now, things may be different. Most of the country wants Epstein's crime ring exposed.

Lorraine's BUS stop is coming to mind with Giuffre's suspicious death. I asked Lorraine for our first date on my 24th BIRTHday, and while Births are listed with English Berts, Italian Berts share the giant griffin of Steels/Stalls, both in Giuffre colors and format. Two or three weeks later, Lorraine got her pant stain as an apparent pointer to James Comey, and Stains (Surrey with Clappers) share the Crest of English Berts/Births. The latter share black hunting horns with English Brians, and with Patch's while Irish Kilpatricks/Sheera's, sharing "laidir" in their motto with Irish Brians, are also Patchie's. The "UACHtar" motto of Irish Brians can be code for Walks/Wachs (same place as Scottish Kilpatricks).

While John Brennan pushed the Steele dossier, Brans/Brains (Norfolk with Bert-branch Burts) have one pale bar in the colors of the two of German Steels/Stalls who in turn have an upper Shield in Giuffre colors and format. Gofers have drops while drop-using Drops/Trope's share the Chief of Tulls/Tolle's (Staffordshire with Steele/Stall-beloved Arrows) while Tulls/Tullia's share the lone Bran/Brain pale bar. German Tollers share the checks of English Steele's.

Bert- / Burt- connectable Birds/Burds (share Hicks fleur-de-lys) are in the "bird" in the Crest of Kidneys/Gedneys whose saltire-by-fish is in the colors of the French Brian saltire. The other English Birds/Burds have the Bouillon flory in colors reversed, and while the father of Godfrey de Bouillon was in Boulogne, Bologna is where "bird"-using, Page-branch Pane's/Panico's are first known. The Engaine's/Engens suspect in the Bran/Brain motto are said to be from Engen, near Boulogne.

In a French translation," Gofers share the "blood drops" of KilPATRicks and Irish PATTERsons/Cassane's while English Cassane's share the triple Epstein chevrons. It gets interesting where the English Greggs, suspect in the "grege" motto term of Scottish Pattersons, look a little related to the Coat of Flatts/FLETTs and Floats, for German Greggs have the horizontally-split colors of KEWen in colors reversed. The same colors are used vertically-split with FLEETwoods and WAKEfields. My pool CUE was at first going against a FLAT page on the pool table.

This reminds of the story I've told several times, when Mrs. Kilpatrick came to my PEW to PRAY with me on the only day I wore a certain BLAZER to that church, having tiny green-and-black checks, the colors of the LINKletter checks. Blazers look like Kilpatrick kin, and share the Fleetwood martlets. After church, I found my vehicle with a FLAT TIRE in the church PARKING lot, and while Lynch-like Linkletters are first known in Orkney with Flatts/Fletts, Parkings are listed with Perkins who share the PEW/Pugh Coat. Irish Prays share the six pale bars of Trots (Surrey with Clappers) and Coats'/Cotes', a possible pointer to Dan Coats, a deep-state protector who took over the position of James Clapper.

Tire's share the hand holding a "dagger" with Shaws (same place as Scottish Comeys) and Comine's who in turn share the sheaf of Blazers and Cue's/Kews.

Cody is one of the sons of the Kilpatrick couple, and while Codys are listed with Cotys'/Archdeacons, French Cotys' share a Cotton variation with English Cottons, the latter first known in Huntingdonshire with EPPs' and Engaine's/Gains suspect in the motto of Brans/Brains. Engaine's/Gains almost have the Coat of Gore's who in turn share the white wolf in Crest with Gowers/Gore's and FleetWOODs. Fleets are first known in HolBEACH, a location suspect with Hollys / Hole's/Halls. Beach's share the Shield of Pike-loving Clappers, and Pick-connectable Woods are first known in Leicestershire with Parkings/Perkins.

English Prays, with white wolf heads, are first known in Lincolnshire with Holbeach and Hole's/Halls (share Holly dog), and while Floats are first known in Norfolk with Float-connectable Flags/Flecks, Brans/Brains, and with Hyke's/Hake's and Higgs, Miss Hicks, in the dream, was floating in the air, hovering, and Hovers share the Bran/Brain Crest. There are pointers here, with Sleeping Beauty, to Brennan, Clapper and Coats.

Again, Fleets were at HOLbeach, and Hole's are also Halls while I was to shoot a FLAT page in Obama's pool HALL as an assumed pointer to the FBI's Lisa Page, and Perkins Coie. Hickensons share the motto of Page-branch Payne's. Maxwells love Hollys who almost have the Coat of Plunketts who in turn share the tower of Higgins/Hickens and Hickensons (both of Sligo) while Hollys are first known in Norfolk with Hyke's/Hake's, Higgs, and with the Drops/Trope's sharing a Shield of black drops with Higgins/Hickens. The latter's Coat is almost the one of Hills, first known in Worcestershire with Hillarys.

The Kilpatrick motto is, "I make sure," and Sure's use "holly leaves.". Maxwells have a "holly bush" (Dundas' have an "oak bush") while Hollys are first known in Norfolk with Patricks and Hookers. I trace Plunketts to Plancius Varus, father of Plancia Magna of Perga, and I have reasons to trace her Perga family to Perkins (share Hooker lion). "Magna" is a motto term of English Walkers (Yorkshire with Bush's), and Walks are first known in Dumfries with Kilpatricks. "Magna" could be to Maghans / Megyns and similar surnames.

The Blazers almost have a Black Coat, and the other Blacks look a little related to Flatts/Fletts, especially as both Black surnames are first known in Lincolnshire with Fleets. I can point this to Epstein's BLACKmail services because Mails/Mele's/Meille's can take us to Mells/Mele's (Somerset with Wake-like Wage's and Waggs) sharing a giant and red fret with Blake's/Caddels. Cattle's (Norfolk with Patricks) have a giant fret in black, which is essentially the saltire of Blacks, Blazers, Patricks, and Kilpatricks. Hoods have a giant fret too, and they are first known in Devon with Blake's, and with Mule's who almost have the Coat of Wake's (Lincolnshire with Blacks). Therefore, maybe, the wake scene with Mrs. Kilpatrick on Epstein's island can be a victory, God's exposure of Mossad's blackmail services conducted through Epstein.

Mails are also Moeles' while Mueles'/Molds are first known in Cheshire with them, but also with Gamels and Shirts. Moules'/Molds use bars-gemel while Barrs are first known in Ayrshire with Gemels (Shirt colors and format). Bars-gemel are also with Wace's/Wassa's. I was shirtless on the Epstein beach, maybe a picture of someone losing his shirt by blackmail. Or, I was BARE-BREASTed, and Bare's are listed with Barrs. Bill Barr's father seems to have known Jeffrey Epstein. Gamals/Gamble's (look related to Hicks and Leakeys) are in the colors and format of Chaffs (Dorset with Beautys), except that the latter (the Chaffs) have symbols in their Chief, which are the triple BREST lozenges in colors reversed. German Camels, sharing a gold griffin with Chaffs, have the Brest lozenge in giant form. English Camels/KeyMELLs (Beauty colors and format) are first known in Somerset with Mells!

For the first time ever, I'm convinced that Sleeping Beauty points to Epstein blackmail. I've never tried to go after Black-Mail heraldry before. This is also the first update to do a set on "Mossad."

Huffs/Hoffs look related to the part of the Linger Coat (Meschin scallops, linkable to Sale's of Cheshire) that's in Cough / Cuff / Sale colors and format. Then, Lingers share the bend-with-scallops of Spencers who in turn share the Mell/Mele fret in colors reversed. That bend is in the colors of the Mail/Mele bend. Then, while Blake's/Caddels, part of the pointer to blackmail, have the giant, red fret of Mells/Mele's, Linger-like Lings and StarLINGs are first known in Suffolk with the Buckle's in the "buckles" of Starlings and Caddels/Cadwells.

Also, Suffolk is where the Mutford location of Blondville's is while Mutfords are listed with MUCKfords while Mucks are first known in Banffshire with Caddels/Cadwells. Mucks are almost perfect because Much's, listed with Muschats, share the Epstein Coat! Musks are listed with Muscats while Elon Musk owns Starlink while Starlings list Starlincks. I'm not sure whether Elon Musk should be in this blackmail discussion, however. Lings and Lingers recall LINKletters from my Black-connectable blazer.

Epsteins have the Bley/Bled Coat in other colors, and Blazers are thought to have been at a Blay location. Bled is a location beside Lesce, which I trace to Leslie's who in turn essentially share the Starling Coat. Then, Lesce-like Lesks/Lusks are first known in Berkshire while Berkshire's share the fret-using quadrants of Spencers who in turn share the bend-with-scallops of Lingers.

It took me a few minutes to realize: English Blays/Bleys/Bly's have a giant griffin in the colors of the Moster/Mist griffin heads. Blake's can be gleaned as kin of Tails/Tailers, and then the Battle's/BatTAILs, who share a gold griffin with Mosters/Mists, are in the embattled fesse of Mosters/Mists. Battails thus look like a Bat-line merger with Tails, and it just so happens that Bats are first known in Shropshire with Moses' and TALbots (Tailboy branch), and Meschins. The latter descended from Lucy Taillebois, from Lincolnshire with the first-known Blacks (share Bat saltire).

Moses-like Mases' are listed with Masseys, who lived at Birkenhead, tending to explain why Masci's share the Birch fleur. Birkenhead is in Wirral, the latter being where Mails/Mele's (possibly the Masci wing) are first known. BERKshire's look related to Mells/Mele's.

Moses' share the "calvary" symbol, in colors reversed, with Crystals. Mrs. Kilpatrick / Miss Hicks attended a church in Crystal City (Texas) before she attended the same church as I went to. Crystals are first known in Yorkshire with Hicks', owl-using Calvarys, and HOWdens. Owls are also HOWls. Aside from the Howden Chief, Howdens are in Hicks colors and format.

I found Howdens by following the Cavalry variation of Calvarys to Cavels of Howdenshire (Yorkshire with Dents and Dance's). Cavels use a giant calf in the colors of the red calves of Chaff-like Calfs/Caufs. Chaffs share the giant Battle/Battail griffin. Coughs and Cuffs have the DANCEtty feature, and look like Dent kin. HOWDens look like "Hood," and Hoods have "Cornish choughs" while Cavals are first known in Cornwall. The Durants expected in the Cornwall motto share the fleur-de-lys of Cough's and Cuffs. Hoodens/Hopfers (Hover kin?) share the anchor (different color) with Hoods.

This part of the meandering can possibly point to red heifers in Israel, bought from Texas by the Temple Institute, because Howdens had an old HOVEden variation that can explain why Sleeping Beauty was HOVERing. Hovers'/Hoffers/HOFFs are linkable to Heffers/Heifers (Somerset with Chaff-connectable Mells). Huffs/HOFFs and Overs/Offers are not only first known in Cheshire with Mails/Mele's (and Savage's), but their Coat and Crest look related to them. Mails/Mele's can be sharing the Savage lion while there's a "savage" in the Caval Crest.

The red calves recalls the red bull of Anchors in the giant anchor of KAUFmans (HanOVER). Miss Hicks moved from my area of Texas to Kaufman county, not far from where the red heifers were arranged for transport to Israel. However, this heraldic set with the Caval calf started with Mossad-like Moses'. Cavals of Howdens were in Yorkshire with Mustans/Mussens and Mosters/Mists. Cavals are in the colors of the giant red bull of Boyville's (Cornwall with Cavals and Hicks' of St. Ewe), a branch of Boys/Boets/Boeddu's and thus a branch of Beautys/Bowds (same place as Chaffs). We could reason that the Temple Institute was founded and/or often governed by the line of Joseph CAIAPHas.

The black tower in the Higgins/Hicken Crest can be the one of Domino's, likely a branch of Dunhams/Domine's (Norfolk). Obama urged his Intelligence people to frame Trump on behalf of Hillary Clinton's surprise election loss.

Hickensons have a "mori" motto term while Mori's/Morinis' share the double fesses of Dons while Dunhams are also Dounhams. The Donna's suspect in the Don motto are listed with Italian Dance's, first known in Piedmont with Domino's. The latter are suspect in the COMBer/Coomer motto. After I took the pool shot on Obama's table, the very next scene had him dancing with his suit on. Suits are listed with Sewers/Shuters.

As Morinis' have two of the Maur/Maurino fesse, this picture could be a pointer to Maurene Comey, the slated prosecutor of Jeffrey Epstein in 2019. She's the daughter of James Comey, yes, Obama's FBI chief. Maurs/Maurino's share the eight-pointed star of Stelli's. Morinis' are first known in Modena with Casino-branch Casano's/Cassandra's while Cassane's/Cassandra's (Hampshire with Casino-branch Changers) share the triple Epstein chevrons. Maurs/Mars share the scallops of Pattersons/Cassane's.

The Hicks "buck" head can be the "roebuck" head of Deerings, and the "deer" head of Floats. Roe's are first known in Norfolk with Float-related Flags. Miss Hicks was floating in the AIR, and Deerings have their Morinis ancestors in their write-up. I TOUCHed her leg at the knee while she was floating, and while Needs are first known in Lincolnshire with Floats, Knee-branch Needhams are first known in Derbyshire with leg-using Ayers/AIRs/Eyers. Touch's/Tuffs, in the Comey motto, were once said to be first known in Cheshire with Tufts/Tuffs' who in turn share the "phoenix" with Knee's and Needhams.

And then there is the AIRplane, a pointer to Plains/Platters while Plate's share the Maur/Mar scallops.

It just dawned on me that the Knee PHOENix could be a pointer to "subPOENa. The aftermath of the touch to her knee felt victorious.

Touch's are now said to be first known in Aberdeenshire with Milans/Millens and Melansons while Maurs/Maurino's are first known in Milan, home of VISconti's. Vise's (Sussex with Douns/Downs) share the Knee and Needham stag head. Needhams are in the write-up of Halpers (Worcestershire with Higgin-connectable Hills) who share the Steele checks, and Halper-branch Halps are first known in the same place as Floats.

STEFAN Halper was used by Comey's FBI along with Christopher Steele. Italian Stefans have a Coat version of Page-branch Pane's/Panico's/Panetta's (Bologna), and while Panico's were at the Setta valley draining into the Reno river, Reines' share the Comey-like "comet" with Italian Stefans. German Stefans/Stevens share the Coat of Stevenson-beloved Garlands. Leon Panetta was Obama's secretary of Defence, in close cahoots with John Brennan.

The Stevenson garland is with Scottish COUPers/Coppers, begging whether they can be a pointer to a political coup on Trump. Coupers/Coppers have "a HAND holding a garland," and Hands/Hanns look related to the Cup/Cope / Copp Coat. Coupers/Coppers share "laurel" with giant-cup Laurie's/Larrys and Lorraine's. Lorraine had the pant stain, and Stains have the hand "HOLDing" a garland but called a "wreath." The Stain hand comes from a cloud while McLeods/Clouds have a "Hold" motto term. Holds and Holdings are first known in Lancashire with COO's/Cowes'. Stevensons/Stave's (same place as Lorraine's) have a hand from a cloud holding a "laurel garland."

German Gars are also Garners, and Corners are listed with Garners. The corner-pocket sewer. Garland-related Stefans (share same Coat) are first known in Prussia with Gars/Garners (East Prussia).

To pin Stefan Halper to the page on Obama's billiard table, Italian Stefans share the red label of Scottish Pagans/Pings, first known in Yorkshire with Panico-like Pincs who in turn share the Reno and MontaCUTE lozenges. Cute's/Cutts, first known in Lincolnshire with Halper-branch Halps, share the white greyhound with Bologna's. Cute's/Cutts (share greyhound with Pennys) almost have the Penn/Pence/Penner Coat, and Pense's are listed with PINCons.

Then, as if God arranged it, Halpers are HalfPENNYs too while Halps are also Halfs. Pennys share the lynx with Lynch's. Penningtons share the cat with Galways, and Lynch's are first known in Galway with Teague's (share brown wolf with Halperts/Halberts). Scottish Comeys are first known in Perthshire with Halperts/Halberts (Penning colors). Loretta Lynch was Comey's boss during the Steele COUP-attempt. Coo's/Cowes' (Lancashire with Penningtons) use "pennants". The Coe variation could be a pointer to Perkins Coie, for the latter was involved in the coup attempt.

John Kerry, who replaced Hillary Clinton as Obama's foreign minister, may have been in cahoots with Stefan Halper because Halps/Halfs incorporate the Kerry Shield.

What do Epstein and Maxwell have to do with Hillary's Steele dossier? Alex Acosta said that Epstein was with Intelligence, and the dream on Epstein's island points to James Clapper (head of all Obama's Intelligence) from the beach that Mrs. Kilpatrick was on. She was at a car upon a beach, and Cars/Currs, expected in the Denham motto, were related to Perkens/Parkinsons (not "Perkin"). James Clapper rejected to use the Steele dossier as a weapon against Trump, until Obama insisted that he push it as real. Clapper did wrong, and to this day he protects himself rather than confess his part in the crime. Ditto for Brennan.

There is a Dossier surname sharing the black fesse with Barrs, the latter first known in Ayrshire with Pike's/Pickens, perfect where English Pike's (Devon with Doke's/Duke's) have the split colors of Dossier's in colors reversed. Clappers love the Pike's, and Bill Barr's father was possibly privy to Epstein's dark side.

There is also a Dosser variation of Doss'/Doose's, a little interesting where Tossers, listed with MacInTOSH's, share the Coat, Crest and motto of Scottish Comeys/Combs. They both have a Tosh-like "Touch" motto term, and Touch's/Tows share the giant lion of Lyons, the latter first known in Perthshire with Comeys/Combs and Tullia-beloved Butters/Bitars. Tulls'/Tolle's (share Tool lion) can be traced without doubt to Tullia of Lyon, making her line expected also to Tulls'/Tullia's and Tools. German Tollers (Mecklenburg with Dols) share the Steele checks. Tullia of Lyon married Decimus Rusticus of Auvergne, and the Bouillons (Auvergne) almost have the flory cross of English Tollers/Towlers.

The "cue ball" went sewering into the corner pocket, and Corners/Garners are first known in Rutland, beside Perkins of Leicestershire, and beside Pockets and Puckets/Bockets of Lincolnshire. Hillary hired Mr. Steele via her legal team at PERKINS COIE. Brechens, first known in Angus with Sewers/Shuters, share the Pucket/Brocket Coat. Pews/PUGHs share the Perkin Coat. The CUE ball on Obama's billiard table seems to apply to Perkins Coie.

Cue's/Kews are first known in Norfolk with Comey-connectable Comine's, and both share the same sheaves. Scottish Comeys share the cat with Catchers, Cattans and Keats, all-three first known in Norfolk. Italian Botters, looking related to Balcons/Balcombs/BalCome's (share the bend-with-roses of French Chatans), are first known in Lucca while Lucca's use a giant cat. Luce's, sharing the pike with Clappers, are first known in Norfolk too. Scottish Chatans/Cato's own the motto of Clan Chattan, borrowed by Scottish Comeys. Cattans share the fitchee of Traver-connectable Tarves', for Tarves is where cat-using Chives' are first known while the six, black fitchees of Tarves', in the format of the six sheaves of Cue's/Kews, are shared by Clintons and Hillarys. Cue's/Kews are in Traver/Traves colors and format, and Chives' were kin of Mathie-like Mathis'.

Cue's/Kews share the blue sheaf of Kewens/Kevens who in turn share the Maxwell motto.

Mecks/Meeks have a "duck" while German Ducks are first known in Westphalia with Pansys who in turn share the doves of Peace's/PAISE's while English Page's are also PAIGE's, and both surname have white doves. English Ducks are first known in Somerset with Payne's, and with Tints sharing a blue unicorn in Crest with Layers/Leyrs. Amazingly, while the cue ball started out as a page, Peace's/Paise's are in the colors and format of McCabe's/McABBE's while the nasty Andrew McCabe was Comey's deputy director of the FBI. Scottish Abbe's are first known in Angus with Sewers and Duns. McCabe's partner in crime was his FBI-appointed lawyer, Lisa PAGE. This FBI cabal targeted Trump by going after Carter Page when abusing the FISC (FISA court). Fiscs (Norfolk again) can have the Mackets (same place as Clappers) in their motto. Kilpatrick-beloved Make's are listed with Scottish Macks.

The PAPER airplane went into the SEWER. What might the COMpasses of Nations/Nathans be code for, expected in the "BLUE carNATIONs" of Papers? The Pass' possibly in "compass" are first known in Essex with SEWARds. Blue's are first known in Arran with McCabe's. Blows are first known in Staffordshire (beside Bellows) with the Arrows in the Nation/Nathan Crest. English Blois' are first known in Suffolk with PLAINs/Platters.

The Obama dream opened with my viewing the entire billiard hall downward from the ceiling. There was one long row of tables, and one short row. They met at a corner such as to form a L-shape. All tables were covered with a black, L-shaped sheet. It was just then when I instinctively knew that Obama owned this hall with a partner, but the partner was not mentioned. After the dream, I used the L-shape to peg Loretta Lynch. Just before the 2:00 point of the video below of this week, we learn that Obama used Loretta Lynch to fulfill his own plot, to ply James Comey:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=db7lI4Sa_eE

Adding Bondi's "Strike Force" to My Goal-Line Score

John Ratcliffe was suspect in my slide-in goal, which was a TIP-IN goal with the puck resting on the goal LINE. Tipps'/Tippins (Lancashire with Ratcliffs) share the Ratcliff bull head. I showed how that goal pointed to election fraud, but what I don't remember knowing is that the Ratcliff-Crest bull is said to be "LINEd gold." Election fraud includes Hillary Clinton's dossier plots.

Scottish Line's share the annulet of Rush's in the "BULrushes" of Petts. Bulls/Bule's share triple, fessewise annulets (different colors) with Rush's. I did rush when getting this goal. Petts share the mascles of Bullys (Dumfries with Bells), and Roger de Bully is in the write-up of Jumps sharing the Trump stag head and the Belly rose.

The following may be off-topic from the hockey goal, but here we go, anyway. The shark's teeth were ringed around the BULLdog's belly, with the head inside the mouth, and then Avril Haines, Biden's director of National Intelligence, can fit this picture. French Avrils/Aprils are first known in Brittany with Shark-line Sarasins who in turn almost have the Coat of English Avrils/Abrills. French Avrils/Aprils have the Jump and belly roses in half their colors.

Then, Scottish Hains share the lozenges of Bullys, both first known in Dumfries with Bells. The Avril/April Chief, if it had the Belly roses in both colors, would be in the colors and format of Dog-like Douglas', first known in Moray with Bellys. See that?

Avril's middle name is, Danica, and half of the English Dance Coat is in the colors and format of Scottish Hains. The latter are also Hennings while Henns share the lion of Irish Comeys. This is compelling heraldry, but at first I couldn't see how Avril Hains could be part of the hockey goal. I then noted that Henns are first known in Sussex with Pucks, Packs, Downs (share Jump stag), and Coppers/Coopers. Packs are in Avril/April colors and format, and Pucks happen to show only hands and a red rose while hand-using Hands/HANNs are in the colors and format of red-rose Cups/Cope's. Avril HAINES.

Kepke's are also Kopke's, a branch of Kupe's/Koops, and German Hanns' share the giant rooster of Kopple's (Nuremberg with Keips).

There were only seconds left in the 2-2 tie, semi-finals hockey match, when Steve Tarr received a long pass at center ice along the boards. He skated with the puck to the blue line, with only one opposing player in the end zone to block him. Seeing this from midway between center ice and the blue line, I naturally RUSHed with all my might to get beside or past the lone defenseman for a pass in front of the net. But Tarr took a slap shot from just inside the blue line, about the time that I was crossing the blue line, resulting in a puck coming to rest of the goal line. Seeing this dead puck with nobody between me and the net, and with the goalie knocked flat to the ice by the slap shot, my knees gave out in the excitement, and so I slid to and past the net, tipping the puck home with probably less than 10 seconds left. There was no face-off after this goal because time had run out on the clock. It launched us to the championship game, where I got the first goal of the game, from a pass from Steve Tarr, on Jim McGee. Scottish McGee's are first known in Dumfries with Bullys and Hains, and Kilpatricks.

Tarrs are first known in Somerset with Bulls/Bule's and Trents, and the neighboring Tarents (Dorset with Beautys and Pett-branch Pits), in the colors and format of English Line's, named Tarant-RUSHton. Tarr probably took the slap shot because he felt rushed. He and I were still on the bench when I looked up at the clock, seeing two minutes and some seconds left (don't remember how many seconds, just remember the two minutes). By the time the coach put us on the ice...that's why we were rushing when finally on the ice.

Just as I was wondering whether I should repeat that Clocks share the Clint/Clent Coat, a video (Viva Frei, Monday) that was playing said "cloak" as per Obama the devil. I recalled that Clocks are also Cloaks.

We won the game with THREE goals, and Tree's love the Knights while Nights/NETs/Naughts were first known beside the Nitts/Naughts of Dumfries, who likely named the Nith river, location of Kilpatrick castle. Knightons named Knighton...in Worcestershire with the Clent Hills. As Tarrs almost have the Mack/Make Coat, we can take it to the "I make sure" motto of Kilpatricks, because Sure's share the stork in Crest with Petts (bulRUSHes) and Pits, and then Kilpatrick-connectable Shere's/Sheers are first known in Surrey with Rush's.

I don't usually go to Stevens when talking about Steve Tarr, because I don't know how Stevens apply. But, I must have had a blind spot, because I forgot all about the German Stevens, who show pale bars only, in the colors of the pale-bars-only of Tarrs. German Stevens even share three pale bars (different colors) with English Knights. Prior to writing the paragraph above with "three", I had Tews in mind because the game was tied 2-2, but I didn't realize until writing this paragraph that Tews share the English Knight Coat! Thus, the game-breaking goal connects to Mrs. Kilpatrick = Sleeping Beauty, I've got to assume. As the Nitts/Naughts share the Shield of Italian Ferrands and Tool-branch Tulls/Tolle's, from Tullia of Lyon in Clermont-Ferrand, it's notable that Tews are listed with Tewells so that the winning goal can be a pointer to TULSi Gabbard.

IN FACT WOW: TULLS'/Tullia's are first known in Dauphine with French Page's, and with Pagans/Payens who share the same-type "spur rowell" with Tews/Tewells!!! Gabbards were at Winton while Wintons share the English Page Coat in other colors. Wins are first known in Wales with Tews/Tewells.

SUPER: the Tew/Tewell spur rowell goes with the Knight spur! So, yes, it seems that God is pointing to the Nith river with the tie score. Then, three-like Tree's have "a knight in armor, brandishing a sword", and there is a Brandish surname ("covered cups" = cloak theme), first known in Suffolk with Knights, no surprise. Nitts/Naughts probably have Suffolk's Omens/Omans in their motto.

My inclination here is to identify the Rush horse with the same-colored Massey "PEGasus," for Peggs, looking related to the Sure Coat, are first known in Derbyshire (beside Masseys) with Sure's. And Masci's share the fleur-de-lys with Kilpatricks/Sheera's.

I now realize that the heraldic pegaSUS can be part-code for SUSmans/SussKINDs, for Kinds (in the Kay motto) are first known in Derbyshire with Peggs. This discovery would not have been made had I not heard of Michael Sussmann in yesterday's news. He was another lawyer for Hillary Clinton, another lawyer with Perkins Coie. Susans are first known in Oxfordshire with English Line's. Sussmann was acquitted in court for his part in Hillary's plots, but as the case was brought in Washington DC, he escaped unscathed. Sussmann was Hillary's campaign lawyer, and so how possibly didn't he at least know of the engineering of the Steele dossier?

Kinds love the Columns, as do giant-bull Pelosi's/PILATi's. Columns love the Petits, first known in Kent, where bulrushes-using Petts were once said to be first known. After I scored the goal-line goal, the team cleared the bench to PILE on me in celebration. French Pile's/Pilots can connect to Pelosi's, and while Pillows are listed with English Pilotte's, I reckoned that the election-fraud fight of Mike Lindell was in view with this winning goal. For both Line's and Lindells are also Linds. Thus far, Mike Lindell has spoiled his election-fraud fight by consistently asking for donations to his My Pillow company whenever he's on a news show concerning his election-fraud fight. So far, he's had no victories to speak of.

"My Pillow" can address the My's/Meigh's who share the McGee/Magee boar head. My first goal in the championship match was on James McGee. There's still time for Lindell to find a way to get a court victory. Judge-branch Judds/Juggs share the My/Meigh boar head, and while Marc Elias was seeking to confound election-fraud fights, Elias' are first known in LINlithshire with tenants who in turn likewise share the My/Meigh boar head. The Plene's suspect in the Tenant motto are listed with French Plants/Plantagenets while French Plants can be in the "plants growing out of a log" of Lindells/Linds!

I can trace Tertullus of Perga, husband of PLANCia Magna, to mythical Tertullus in Fulk ancestry, and thus to Geoffrey Plantagenet-Fulk. That's why French Plants are also PLANQUE's. English Planks share, I assume, the lion of Cabbage's in the "cabbages" of Plants/Planque's. Cabbage's are first known in Northampton with Blanche's/Blanks while German Planks are listed with Blanks. The point is, Tertullus of Perga was related to a Mr. Simplex, and this is why I trace him to the "Simplex" motto term of Perkins. Marc Elias of Perkins Coie.

It's probably important that Planks/Blanks share the giant lion of Force-colored Sforza's while the Sforza lion holds a "quince" while Quince's are first known in Northamptonshire with Blanche's. Todd Blanche is assembling a so-called "STRIKE FORCE" legal team to supposedly go after high-level Obama crimes.

We then go to Line-like Alina Habba, Trump's former lawyer whom Todd Blanche is right-now trying to keep in the position of acting attorney general of New Jersey. English Planks are first known in Wiltshire with Happers/Hoppers/Happys. Hobs/Habs/Habbie's love the Hawks who in turn have a motto, "Strike." Strike's are first known in Lancashire with Force-like Forts and STANDish's. FortiBUS' can explain while Blanche's share the giant cinquefoil of Bus' (Norfolk with Hawk-beloved Pilgrims and Steins).

Hurts/Horts are first known in Oxfordshire with English Line's, and "FORTitudine" is a motto term of HOBsons (Essex with Stave-branch Stevensons/Steinsons) who share "hurts" with Irish Arthurs while Scottish Arthurs, first known in Berwickshire with Hobs/Habs/Habbie's, have an "OBstantia" motto term. Stants are listed with Stands/Stains, a Stave branch, and Hawks, having "pilgrims' staves," are first known in Hampshire with Tudys/TOTTa's in turn sharing the chevron of Hobsons who in turn have a "FortiTUDine" motto term. TODD Blanche. Todds are first known in Norfolk with Tuits/Tute's, TWITTs, Pilgrims (who likewise have staves), and Blanche-connectable Bus'. Tweeds/Twiddys share a blank, blue Chief with Hobsons (blank Chiefs can be code for Blanks).

When on the Stevensons/Stave's earlier in this update, the topic went to "coup."

Mike Lindell paid for much of Kari Lake's election fraud fight against Katie Hobbs, but the fight was lost to leftist Arizona judges unafraid to act corruptly, thanks to Trump's inaction on the election-fraud front. I feel he was swayed by leftist media and RINO ignorance into thinking that fighting election fraud makes one look like a fool-hardy conspiracy theorist. Now is the time to punish election fraudsters at the highest levels, which is how to win the mid-term elections.

This week: "The strike force consists of teams made up of investigators and prosecutors that focus on 'the worst offenders engaged in fraudulent activities, including, chiefly, health care fraud, wire fraud, mail fraud, bank fraud, money laundering offenses, false statements offenses,' and more, according to the DOJ." Ah, er, I didn't see election fraud in that list. The same article: "Earlier this month, CIA Director John Ratcliffe sent a criminal referral for former CIA Director John Brennan to the FBI."

Force's have leopards while English Leopards are first known in Sussex with Foss' who in turn share the red fox with Todds. Leopards are all over heraldry in leopard faces (have no necks) while Face's/Fessys, a branch of Fauci's, are first known in Northamptonshire with Blanche's. Fauchys have the "grassHOPPER" while we saw Hoppers/Happers/Happys above. Thatchers/Thackers (Essex with Hobsons) have grasshoppers too.

However, I don't trust Todd Blanche. He was a New-York Democrat until 2023, and is therefore susceptible to demonic influence. In other words, why did he support the demonism party all the way to 2023 if he had an ounce of common-sense righteousness within him? How blind or corrupt is he?

Repeat from above: "Strike's are first known in Lancashire with Force-like Forts and STANDish's." Stands/Stans bring us to Stanleys, first known in Cambridgeshire with Stouts/Stows who, ignoring their Chief, are in Force colors and format. Stanleys love the Changers in their motto who in turn share the triple fesses of Casino's, colors reversed from the triple Stout/STOW fesses. Changers are first known in Hampshire with Strike-loving Hawks, STURs/STOWers, Cassane's, and Chance-branch Chase's. Hobsons are first known in Essex with Chance's (may share the Thatcher cross) and Asters/STURs.

It's important that the Stout/Stow Chief and Shield is almost the one of Holds/Holts because the latter are first known in Bury of Lancashire with Ratcliffs. The DoJ's strike force is working in conjunction with John Ratcliffe, we may safely assume. Holts/Holts (Lancashire with Forts) share the double fesses of MATTERs/Mathers ("FORTiter"), first known in Kincardineshire with Scottish Stracks, interesting where I'm hearing that Marc Elias is having a falling out with his client, Media Matters (leftist crunching machine).

Strike's are listed with Strachers (Lancashire with Cave's, SEEDs, and Holdings) while Scottish Stracks/Strachens have a "SED caveo" motto phrase. Cave's share the Coat of Caens, the latter first known in Dorset with Holding-beloved Beaks (Holding have beakless eagles), Cave-like Chaffs, ChafFINCH's, Ratcliff-connectable Beautys, and with the Stour river of Sturs/Styre's. Back-beloved Steers have a "cede" motto term suspect with the Cedes variation of Seeds. Beautys-branch Boys/Boets/Boeddu's have a giant bull in the colors of the giant "steer" (bull) of German Backs/Bachs.

Finch's are first known in Hertfordshire with Beak-like Beach's/Bechs and Scale's. Finchems share the triple fesses of Beaks. Scale's share the scallops of Capes' who in turn share the Chief-Shield colors of Chaffs. The Back "steer" was once showing as a calf probably because Calfs are also Caufs. The Mee's/Meigh's expected in the Steer motto are first known in Nottinghamshire with English Stracks/Streckleys/STRETch's in turn sharing the giant eagle of English Backs. The latter are first known in Somerset, beside's Devon's STREETs/Straights, Staggs/Stage's, and Ratcliff-connectable Walerans. The stag heads of Staggs/Stage's are in the colors of the giant stag of Scottish Stracks.

I don't like the Stage's in this heraldic set in case Blanche and/or Bondi are staging a sincere attempt at making arrests, only to land upon the voters excuse after excuse for undesired failure when in reality the intention was always to fail. A charade could easily be prolonged to the midterm elections with the pretence of imminent arrests to be made, but the voters won't buy it. They want arrests now. They have every reason to believe, now, that Trump is a fraud on the issue of swamp clean-out. The voters are the only chance for America. They must force Trump's hand, or the inhuman crocs in the Democrat cesspool will come back to bite them hard.

It's just that I was on "strike force" when Strike's/Strakers got me to Stage-related Stracks. I did have a sleeping BAG dream (treated it heraldically dozens of times) that ended with two stages in a MALL as a pointer to both the Malls and Morleys/Mauls. The Bags, sharing the GRIMaldi Coat, are first known in Norfolk with Purple's and PilGRIMs, and the latter two are in the purple pilgrims' staves of Hawks. The latter have the motto, "Strike." The sleeping bag was on a bank off of a ROAD that itself pointed to Rhodes Scholars such as Bill Clinton, it also pointed via Malbanks to Hillary RODham Clinton, for Malbanks share the ermined Rodham bend, and both are first known in Northumberland. The mall PARKING lot on the opposite side of the road (from the sleeping bag on bank or hill) pointed to Perkins Coie.

While Malls have the Malbancs, Banks are first known in Yorkshire with Morleys/Malls. David Morley, my old friend (real life), rode a circle around the sleeping bag on his motorbike. Amazingly, Banks share the Hawkin fleur-de-lys, gold like the Hicks fleur-de-lys.

Interestingly, while David Morley did point to Welsh Davids, they almost have the Gabbard/GIBBert Coat while Scottish Gibbs have the HAWKeswell Coat in other colors. Hawks have a motto, "Strike," and Gibbs have a leopard in Crest, the FORCE symbol too (different color). Will the DoJ's / FBI's Strike Force expose the things pointed to by this dream? Is God wanting credit for it by revealing it through the dream? Gabbards/Gibberts had a home at Winton, in Hampshire with the first-known Hawks.

Force's are also Forcier's, in Fortier colors. It just so happens that Fortier's share the tower of Towers, first known in Lancashire with Forts. Fortier's have lions comBATTANT. Scottish Gibbs also share the Battin/BATTANT/BADEN Coat in other colors, and then German Gabe's/GOWbs/GOObe's are first known in Baden while Gows/McGoo's are first known in Inverness-shire with Scottish Gibbs. Gows/McGoo's share the Chief-Shield colors of English Gabels.

As Morley did nothing but ride a circle around the sleeping bag, only to ride down the road from whence he came, perhaps the sleeping bag represents a crime scene inspected by the FBI. KASH Patel is the FBI director, and while Kash's are listed with Scottish Caseys, French Caseys/Caze's are first known in Ile-de-France with Fortier's.

The Pellicans in the Pattle Crest share a giant tower (different colors) with Fortier's. Gaywoods have three of the Pellican towers, and Bags are first known in Gaywood. The same character that spoke the lines for Mr. Magoo (cartoon character) also played the rich tycoon, Thurston Howell, on Gilligan's Island, and Howells share the Gaywood Coat. Thurston's wife was Lovie, and Lovie's/Love's were kin of Epstein-connectable Muschats. Both Musks/Muscats and Lovie's/Love's were once said to be first known in Suffolk, where THURstons and Owls/Howls are first known. Howells and Gaywoods have the THOR/Tour Coat in colors reversed.

How does a sleeping bag represent a crime scene? The Bag Chief has the cinquefoils of Gangs (Norfolk with Bags) in colors reversed, a possible pointer to government gangsters. I hope. Bags are first known in GayWOOD, while the bag was in the woods. Bagleys named Bagley Wood. Hamon de Massey ruled a Bagley location. The only thing I did with the bag was PICK it up, I don't remember dropping it or carrying it as I walked up the hill to the road. Roads share the Child eagle. Picks/Pix's share the Wood fitchees. Pike-loving Clappers are first known in Surrey with English Gays. French Gays (Savoy with French Masseys) have a giant rooster in gold, the color of the Heath rooster, and John Ratcliffe of Heath was mayor of Heath, and Spanish Mayors/Majors share the checkered Shield of Halpers. Stefan Halper of the Steele crimes against Trump. Thomas Massie wants to pick up the Epstein issue after Trump tossed it away, wanting to hide it.

Ahh, English Mayors/Majors share the red greyhound with Pennys while Halpers are HalfPENNYs too! Ratcliffe's mayoral position has taken us here. And, almost forgot: Penningtons share the Bagley lozenges! I had claimed that Louise of Pennington's clothing was in the sleeping-bag dream, but that claim had nothing to do with John Ratcliffe. Note that Bagleys and Penningtons are in Stagg/Stage colors, for Louise appeared on a stage with Miss Peare, and Percys have the Pennington / Bagley lozenges in colors reversed.

The Hawkin write-up: "The [Hawking] family had previously borne the name of Flegg, for William de Flegg, 13th cent., held a fief in Hawking (Testa de Neville). The family had been seated at Flegg, Norfolk,..." Fleggs are listed with Flags while Flys of Flagi are first known in Hampshire with Hawks. I link the Fly Coat to Pratts (Norfolk). Norfolk is also where Hyke's/HAKE's and Higgs are first known, both in the same colors and format. It's therefore amazing that the stages in the sleeping-bag dream fit well with the heraldry above that took off from "strike force."

The sleeping bag was on a hill, which later turned out to be a bank. Morley-branch Morlands/Mauleys share the fleur-de-lys of Banks (Yorkshire with Morleys/Mauls). It's completely interesting that the Ughetorp area of Yorkshire is said, in the Morland/Mauley write-up, to have gone to Ratcliffe's by marriage to Mauleys. In the News section below, watch John Ratcliffe convince the country that he's gunning for arrests of the Clinton / Obama crime ring. John's a straight-shooter, and I can tell he's sincere. If God be with him, he'll have the courage to do what needs to be done.

There's a reason as to why the "se" motto term of RatCLIFFs should be for the Mortone-SAY location of Cliffs. However, it just so happens that See's/Sea's share the triple-wavy fesses of German Drummonds while Scottish Drummonds have a "gang" motto term, suggesting that Ratcliffe is going to play in picking up the sleeping-bag crime. Drummonds use "Gang WARILY," and Mall-like Mails were at Wirral. When I thought that Mails were pointing to Epstein blackmail, I has said: "Mails/Mele's can be sharing the Savage lion," but then Woods have a savage.

Drummonds (named Drymen in Stirlingshire) essentially share the Stur Coat while Sturlings/Stirlings, with a "Gang forward" motto, use buckles while Buckle's are first known in Suffolk with Sea-branch Seamans.

The bank is also a hill, for Higgins-connectable Hills are first known in the same place as Hillarys who share the six Clinton fitchees. Clintons are first known in Oxfordshire with Peare's, and the Sleeping-bag dream ended when Christine Peare came from one of the mall stages onto my stage. We were in the act of hugging as the dream ended, and while Hugs (Languedoc with Font-de-Ville's) share two symbols of Fonts/Fountains (Norfolk with Higgs), there is a Higgin-like Huggin surname. The dream ended pleasantly, not dismally, but there was disappointment because the hug that was inches away never arrived, I woke up. It perhaps points to a tease, as though Trump, or someone else, will throw cold water on the sincere efforts of Ratcliffe and Gabbard.

I've told many times that Tease's/Tess' (Switzerland with the Ticino canton) are from the Tessin river, otherwise called the Ticino, location of Pierro's'/Pero's of Pavia. Chris Peare was the teaser in this dream.

I saw two women on the other stage, and was able to decipher the other lady as LOUISE, a friend of Miss Peare when I met Miss Peare. They both, and I, worked as salespeople in a mall at the time, and we all-three shared an apartment on Elias-like Ellesmere rd. (Toronto). We were all teens. The point is, I've just looked up the Huggin like Hagens to be floored. First of all, Huggins are new to me; I had not known them when telling of this dream so many times before. Not only are the triple Huggin lozenges colors reversed from the triple lozenges of Dutch Hagens, but the Hagen Coat is colors reversed from the French LOUIS Coat!!!! Wow.

What could be the point of all this in the real world? Why did God give such a dream to be deciphered like this? Irish Hagens even show a "flag."

Hawks are first known in Hampshire with Hind-loving Perrys (share Mall quadrants), a surname like "Peare." Parrys have the Hind Coat in colors reversed, and Hinds share the triple Hagen lozenges (!) while Parrys share the triple Huggin / Louis lozenges! It was the Hawk motto that took me to Staggs/STAGE's!!! Does all of this mean that the strike force is a sham, more voter-deceiving theater producing only false hopes?

By "staging," it doesn't necessarily mean that the Trump government won't reveal crimes, but that when it reveals token crimes only, they give the impression that they are out for justice, but have no intentions of making arrests. Otherwise, what else could the stages in the mall point to? Acting careers offered to Epstein's teen models / hookers? Possibly. Note that Huggins share the vair of Hookers (Norfolk again) and possibly the Mail / Hugh lions, for Mails and Malls are first known in Cheshire, turf of HUGH Lupus.

I had walked through the mall parking lot before entering the front doors of the mall. That's why Parkings/Perkins can apply. While in the dream, I thought it was odd to see these basic stages in a mall, made only of lumber, like wood decks, not decorated or spiced up. But then Woods are first known in Leicestershire with Parkings/Perkins. Woodens/Woodhams are in Perken/Parkinson colors and format. The stages seem to be verifying a pointer to Perkins Coie.

Hug With Peare Points to Gabbard

I've told before that the stages doubled as decks as per Decks/Daggers who share the red squirrel with Squirrels and "Teg"-using Gilberts (share Tiss/Tease chevron). TECKs/Tease's/Tess' are from the Ticino river. Squirrels have a "Tiens" motto term while Tiens'/Thames', sharing the Pavia martlets, share the chevron-with-stars of Peare's. Then, the horizontally-split Deck/Dagger Shield takes us to the same of Hips' because the dream ended with my PULLING Peare's hips toward me, and Pullings/Pullys share the Peartree/Patria scallops.

Tecks/Tease's/Tess' have "five green LEAVES pointing DOWN. One in the CENTRE of the saltire and four AROUND." while Downs (Sussex with Leopards) have a giant stag in the colors of the Peartree/Patria stag head. Figure the leaves to be code for Laevi of Pavia. Leave's/Leve's are first known in Norfolk with Parsons and Hips'. English Centers/SAINTers share the Peare and Parson leopard faces. Saints list Suns while Persons/Piersons show only suns. The latter surname, with an emBATTLEd pattern, is first known in Berwickshire with Chaff-connectable Battle's, and with the Dove's in the Leave/Leve Crest. It looks like a Caiaphas-line link to Laevi of Pavia.

The "around" term in the Teck/Tease description reminds that Morley rode a circle around the sleeping bag. I've told before, as per that scene, that Rounds have a "sleeping lion," but in this context, especially with a lion, Sleeps look related to PierLEONi Jews (large topic below). It's a white lion, and because Rundels/Roundels almost have the Alan Coat, I reckon it's the white lion of Rothes' (Kent with Sleeps) who were once said to be first known in Shropshire, where Sleeps were once said to be first known.

The Schere's suspect in the Pulling/Pully motto could be the ones that come up as "Scherf" because Sheriffs (same place as Peers/Peirs) share the Round motto. Scarfs share the triple wolf heads of Bathers, the wolf head (same colors) owned by Hugh Lupus, and Bathers are first known in Denbighshire with Bachs/BAGHs. This Hugh (beside Denbighshire), uncle of le Meschin, is suspect in the hug as per pulling her hips. Pullings/Pullys (Yorkshire with Scarfs) share the motto of Patents/Pattens (Essex with Rounds) who in turn share a lozengy Shield (different color) with Bags. See that?

Bachs/Baghs share the black dog in Crest with Spinks while Hips' (Norfolk with Bags and Gangs) use a "sphinx". The four Spink eagles are in the colors and format of the four Bucket/Bochets cinquefoils, which are in the colors of the Gang cinquefoils, and colors reversed from the Bag cinquefoils. It makes Bachs and Bags look like a Bucket branch.

Pulling the hips of Miss Pierleoni-like Peare took us to the sleeping bag, or at least to Bags. As my mother's maiden name is, Grimaldi, and because Grimaldi's share the Bag Shield, I've got to start thinking that Grimaldi's hooked up with Pierleoni.

Patents/Pattens share the Crest of Leslie's, earls of Rothes, first known in Aberdeenshire with the Culps/Cups in that motto, and with Peartree's/Patria's sharing the Pulling/Pullen scallops. The latter surname was related to Sabine's (same scallop), first known in Norfolk with Hips'. I was pulling her hips. Sabine's are from Flavius Sabinus, husband of Vespasia Polla. Pools are also Pulls (Dorset with Chaffs).

This idea that Sleeps trace to Pierleoni is new right now. The Selepitanoi Illyrians were beside a Hebrew-like Abri people group who were in turn on the direct north-west of Caiaphas-like Cavii. Cave's share the fretty Shield of Peare-connectable Caens (Dorset with Chaffs). Note the Lissus location of Cavii, for Liss'/Lys' are first known in Ile-de-France with Levi's and Chappes'. Liss'/Lise's are first known in Hampshire with Tiss'/Teese's. The map shoes nearby Paionia, where I trace Payens/Paions.

Morley circled the sleeping bag, and English Morleys with Morlands/Mauleys use LEOpard faces. That works for affirming a Sleep trace to Pierleoni.

Perrys share "conFIDO" with the motto of Boyds (Shropshire with Ellesmere's). Fido's/Fothes' are first known in KinCARDINEshire with Scottish Stracks, the ones with the Stagg/Stage stag! KinCARDINEshire is where PEARtree's/PATRIA's were once said to be first known who share the Trump STAG head! Is this a picture developing of fake-fraud Trump? Could be, for he's always staged his clean-the-swamp program. Cardine's share the pheons of Coys while Elias-like Ellesmere's have those pheons in colors reversed!! Bingo.

As I've said many times, Louise was a saleslady for Pennington's clothing, and her surname is, Phillips. Welsh Phillips have an "amor patriae" motto phrase while Amore's are first known in Oxfordshire with Peare's. Penningtons, sharing blue lozenges with French Louis', have an "amore patria" motto phrase. We just saw the Patria's listing Peartree's. The latter share the Sewer fitchees. See Penningtons above in a paragraph with Loretta Lynch.

As I've said several times, the last time I saw Louise, she said she was going into "choreography" = stage productions. But as I didn't know she was in this dream, while I was in the dream, I doubt that the stages appeared in the dream because I was somehow remembering what she told me some three decades earlier. It looks like affirmation from God that Louise was the second woman on the stage. Heraldry tends to affirm it too.

Miss Peare worked for Reitman's clothing at the time, and Jewish Reitmans share the hexagram of Rodden-like Rotens while Rodhams are listed with Roddens. Penningtons share the cat in Crest with Galways, and while Lynch's are first known in Galway, they share the lynx with Pennys.

All eyes on strike force to see whether God performs a checkmate on Trump's 4-D chess board. A checkmate against Trump, that is, forcing him to make some arrests.

I've told that David Morley lived on Harding blvd. when I knew him. I tried hard to understand how the Harding Coat might apply to the topics above, and finally recalled that Yardleys (and Pettys) share triple-gold martlets on a bend (different color) with Yard-like Hardings. Hall of Names says that Hardings are first known in Derbyshire, where English Morleys are first known. I then loaded Yards to see a motto I had seen somewhere in this update, and fortunately remembered that it's with Gabbards. The latter almost have the Welsh David Coat. Coincidence, or does Morley circling the sleeping bag have to do with Tulsi Gabbard's investigations now or future?

TULSi takes us to Tullia of CLERMONT-Ferrand, and "Clermonts" brings up the Clements in the "Clementia" motto term of Morleys/Mauls (Yorkshire with Clermont-loving Keys). See that? French Clairs share the Clermonts/Clement besants. French Clermonts (not "Clermonts") are first known in Dauphine with Tulls/Tullia's. English Clermonts share white dolphins with Marleys, and the latter are said to be from Morlaix...in Brittany, where the other French Clairs are first known. French Clermonts have "SAINT Pierre" in Crest, and Sainters share the Peare leopard faces.

Yards have water BOUGETs (= water containers), which recalls that the Bag-connectable Gangs share the cinquefoils of French Buckets/BOQUETs. Bags have them in colors reversed. Lookie there, it seems that God had always set up the sleeping bag for Tulsi Gabbard, a thing I could not have known until now. Baggets/BaGOTs (goat in Crest) are first known in Staffordshire with Yardleys! And Tulls/Tolle's! That's amazing. We started this heraldic set from merely the street name that Morley lived on. I'm not making it up, it's in the 2nd update of March, 2021:

As I've said many times, Morley rode down the hill to circle the bag, then rode back up, meaning he was RISING up the hill. Cool.

[Insert Sunday -- Oh wow, as I've said before, Morley lived on Harding avenue (Richmond Hill), and while Rice's have a "hardi" motto term,...]

Bags, because they share the GRIMaldi Shield, could have been kin of PilGRIMs (Norfolk with Bags and Gangs). German Rice's happen to have "pilgrims' staves and an oak tree." Oaks are first known in Somerset with Cocks sharing the Bag Shield. Stave's share the Douglas Chief while Douglas' are said to descent from Hardys. Now we can see why Welsh Rice's have a "Secret et hardi" motto. "SeCRET" can be partly for Crete's/Wreaths (same place as Gabbard-related Gibbs) expected in the Stave Crest until Stave's married Garlands. That is, Stave's probably used a wreath (Stain symbol) until they changed it to a "garland."

Lorraine's pant STAIN connects with Stave's/STEINsons, and as it was a grass stain, she got it in a YARD! I first saw the stain as she CLIMBED up the stairs to the BALCONy, and Balcons/BalCOME's can point to Comey, one of the fools that Gabbard is now exposing. CLIMERs are listed with Clements (share double Stain fesses!!!!!) suspect in the Morley/Maul motto, and while Morley lived at Harding about two houses from Church, Lorraine lived, at the same time, at Lorne and Church about three blocks north of Harding.

We can even say that Morley climbed the hill on his motorbike. German Steins, with a goat on "green hills." Rothschilds/Roddensteins (connectable to Dutch Steins) can get us to Roddens/Rodhams (Northumberland with Lorraine's and Malbanks) because they share the MalBANK bend while the hill doubled as a bank. Banks (Yorkshire with Morleys/Mauls and early Stains) share the fleur-de-lys of Morlands/Mauleys. Thus, the dream had a mall parking lot because Malls have Malbancs, and this paragraph tends to prove that the PARKING lot is a pointer to Perkins Coie.

Clements/Climers are first known at Brecknock, also called, Breconshire, and Brecons happen to share the English Bucket Coat!

Yardleys are also YEARdlys, suspect with the Yearby variation of Yarborough's, the latter first known in Lincolnshire with English Buckets, GRASSE's, and Rice-branch Reesors/Reasons (share vaired cross of English Ferrands). Stains are said to have married Yarborough's, you can't believe it. Years are first known in Stirlingshire while Stirlings have a "gang" motto term!!! There must have been secret gangsters in the sleeping bag who need to be shaken out.

"Forward" is shared by the Stirling and Seaton mottoes, and Seatons are first known in East Lothian with the Faucets suspect in the "Facta" motto term of Gabbards and Yards. The latter, first known in Devon with Births/Berts, are in BIRTH/Bert colors and format. I met Lorraine on my birthday, at her bus STOP, and Stops/Stubbs, having the bend-with-buckles of Stirlings in colors reversed, are first known in Staffordshire with Yardleys and Gang-connectable Baggets. Bus', first known in Norfolk with Bags and Gangs, share the cinquefoil (different colors) with them both.

Have I mentioned yet that while Epps/Apps' were once said to be first known in Middlesex with Stains, that looks like it created "EPPstein"? The water bouget of Yards can apply where Waters share the Epstein Coat. Epp-branch Abbe's are first known in Angus with Brecons sharing a Bucket Coat. Hall of Names still has Epps/Apps' first known in Middlesex. Now we know why God gave Lorraine the grass stain in a yard. Yards even have one of the triple Epstein chevrons.

While Yardleys share one Petty Coat, another Petty Coat as a "needle" while Needle's share the Hesse Coat. As Epsteins are first known in Hesse, they could have been related to rulers of Hesse. Yards are first known in Devon with Esse's/Ash's, and with Hazels who share a Hessel variation of Hesse's. NEEDle's remind that Needhams (Derbyshire with Morleys and Hardings) have a phoenix, perfect.

She couldn't have gotten the stain (on bright-white pants) unless the grass was freshly mowed, and Mows/Mole's share the boar of Googe's (Roxburghshire with Mows/Mole's and Maxwells) while Gangs are listed with Geggs/Giggs (Norfolk with Maxwell-beloved Hollys). Maxwells have a "holly BUSH," and I can show that Bush's were of the Bus', but there's a lot to it. Bosco's have "tufts of grass" while Tufts/Tuffs' share the phoenix with Mows/Mole's, what are the chances?

Googe-branch Goffs, in Gofer / Giuffre colors, are first known near the first-known English Gabe's whose saltire-by-swords is in the colors of the Gofer saltire. Is this a pointer to Ms. Gabbard exposing the killers of Virginia Giuffre? She got hit by a BUS. Giuffre's have a giant and white unicorn, and German Gabe's, with the same saltire-by-swords, have a white horse in Crest.

She got the stain likely on Church street, and Church's are in the colors and format of English Bush's. She may have been behind a bush because she was out for a walk alone with a man, her friend's husband. I had just dropped in while she was on the walk, and was waiting on her balcony for her to return.

Epps/Apps' share the scallops of Scale's and the lozenges of Scayle's/Scole's, the latter first known in Yorkshire, where Stains were once said to be first known who married Yarborough's there, at Hessel-like HESLington, to be exact. Heslingtons are also HAZELtons, and so Eppsteins of Hesse look to be potentially in this picture, especially as Scayle's/Scole's share the lozengy Shield of Patents/Pattens, first known in Essex, location of Epping.

It therefore appears solid that God put me together with Lorraine to point to Jeffrey Epstein.

Oh wow. After reading that Scayle's/Scole's were a few miles from Leeds, and therefore near Keppoch, it dawned on me that "Epping" could have been a corruption from "Kepp / Keep," for Keeps share the Lorraine bend because both descend from Maria of Kiev, sister of king YARoslav, the line to YARborough's. I therefore tried for an Epping-like Keeping surname, and one popped up, listing Keppings, and sharing a lozengy Shield (different colors) with Scayle's/Scole's! Keepings/Keppings are even first known in Norfolk with lozengy-Shielded Bags! Jeffrey Epstein's fellow criminals have got to be in that sleeping bag.

Kepke's are also Kopke's, and Keips with Kopple's are first known in Nuremberg.

I once pointed to John Ratcliffe with a 17th squirrel in my attic, the only one I could not catch with the RAT trap. There was no 18th squirrel. I don't want to tell the whole story; suffice to say that Ratcliffe became the DNA, i.e. the head of 16 Intelligence agencies in the U.S., with his National Intelligence office being the 17th.

The point is, the 17th squirrel jumped out of its nest at the GABLE roofline, hit my chest, and fell 2.5 stories safely to the ground. Rats are first known in Nairnshire with the Rose's sharing black water bougets with Yards. The gable roof can indicate Tulsi Gabbard. German Gable's are first known in Silesia with the German Rose's sharing the Coat of the Brittany Clairs. And English Gabe's/Gabbs/GABLErs are first known in Worcestershire with Squirrels!!! The DNA (Director of National Intelligence) now is Tulsi GABBard!!! Can we believe it? So, YES, the gable roof was God's pointer to Ms. Gabbard.

Gabbard/Gibbards are said to have been Gilberts, and Gilberts have a red squirrel, the color of my squirrels (we have no black squirrels here).

Later that year, the same squirrel jumped out the ceiling of my old, rain-ruined trailer (home) while I was merely closing / opening the roof vent beside its ceiling nest (ceiling was drooping). It jumped out from its nest, bounced frantically off the wall, to my chest, then hit the floor and got away out the hole it had chewed in the window screen. While a chest is a breast, Brest is a location near Morlaix of Brittany, a home of Morley-like Marleys.

The "pitchfork" of German and Jewish Gabe's takes us to the "shakefork" of Cunninghams because Shake's share the Gable chevron. Pitch's are first known in Silesia with German Gabe's. Italian Gobels/Gobbi's have a "camel" while German Camels share the Brest lozenge. Gemels and their Barr kin are first known in Ayrshire with Cunninghams and Forkers. Gobels are suspect from Goplo, origin of Mieszko I, father of Swietoslawa, wife of king Forkbeard.

When I was 11, God personally showed me that he struck the chimney of our house with a lightning BOLT. I was strangely in the act of waking, repeating for the second time, "no, I don't believe in you, God," when a frightening bolt occurred as those words were being spoken. The Gobel camel stands on a "mount" while Mounts are first known in Peebles with Balds expected with English Gobels/GodBOLTs/GodBALDs share the Bude bow for connection to Bald-branch Bauds).

My father and I went to the roof to see pieces of chimney BRICKs scattered on the SHINGles. Shins/Chings are first known in Somerset with English Camels, and Shings/Shiners almost have the Forker Coat, both sharing the red HAND of Meschin-connectable Skinners (Lincolnshire with le-Meschin's wife), evoking the Skins/Scans that look like a pointer to 666 skin-scanning machines. Hands share a Hann variation with German Hanns who in turn share the giant rooster of Goplo-like Kopple's. Bricks, with the Massey fleur, have the Brest/Brix lozenge in colors reversed. I suppose that my mother's Masci line was from Mieszko.

The squirrels had jumped out of nests, and English Nests, first known in Sussex with Hand-loving Pucks, and PACKs, share the PAGE doves. Mieszko was a Polish duke, and Polish Packs/PACEwicz's have the Massey / Brick fleur in giant form. English Pace's were formerly first known in Cheshire with Hands and Masseys. Gabbards were at Winton while Wintons have the Page Coat in other colors, and I showed above how that squirrel points to Ms. Gabbard as DNA. Wintons are first known beside Brick-like Brecknock/Breconshire, and Brecks are first known in Shropshire with Meschins.

Mieszko descended from mythical Wheelwright of Goplo, and Wheelwrights share "verba" with the Gabbard motto. The WHEELwright antelope is in the design of the one of shingle-like Singletarys. English Packs are first known in Sussex with Rite's/RIGHTs/Wrights. Scottish Rights/Wrights are first known in Berwickshire with Page-beloved Dove's, and with Wheel-connectable Whale's/Whele's. The latter share the bend of Keeps who are in turn from Casimir of Poland, son of Mieszko II, and then Wells are in the colors and format of Kopple's, first known in Nuremberg with Keips. Now we know that Wheels and Dol-beloved Whale's descend from Mieszko, explaining why the patriarch of Pollocks was a vassal (political servant) of the Dol Alans.

The 17 squirrels were a pointer to 17 Intelligence operations. Spy-like Speyers/Speers (same place as Pollocks) were kin of Italian Pasi's/PACE's whose saltire-by-spears is in the colors of the saltire-by-swords of Gabe's. Then, the saltire-by-spears of Speyers/Spears is in the colors of the saltire-by-bows of Gobels/Godbolts. Peter Pollock built Rothes castle, and Speyer is where Rothschilds/RoddenSTEINs are first known who have the eight-pointed star of Dutch Steins in colors reversed. English Steins have the English Stevenson/Steinson Coat in other colors.

The Kopple rooster would be gold in colors reversed. The Kopple rooster is "STANDing on a mound" while the gold Lever/Liver rooster is "standing on a trumpet". Stands are listed with Stains. Hahns (Mecklenburg with Trumps and Dols) have a giant rooster in Trump and Kepke/Kopke colors and format, and German Hanns share the giant Kopple rooster. It just so happens that the double bendlets of Levers/Livers (Lancashire with Ratcliffs) are shared by Ratcliffs.

Levers/Livers have "the LOWER one [bendlet] engrailed," suggesting that Lowers were from the Lover variation of Levers/Livers. English Lowers are in Coy colors and format while Coo's/Coe's/Cowes' are first known in Lancashire with Levers/Livers and Liverpool. It can be pointing to the coup against Trump by the 17 squirrel spies under Obama.

As I said, it seemed that the lightning bolt (bright light through the window) bounced off my pillow and onto my forehead. Is this a pointer to the 666 on the RIGHT hand or the forehead? Perhaps, because Hann-branch and Trump- and Dol-connectable Hahns are said (in the Bibo write-up) to share the "cushion" of Bibo's.

Bolts are also the Bolds in the motto of Gallups, and it just so happens that Gallops have the Welsh David Coat with a gold bend. That bend is with Moters while David Morley was on a MOTORbike coming off the ROAD. Davids and Gallups (Dorset with George's) have different-colors versions of the Coat of Gabbards of Winton. The dream ended with my pulling Miss Peare by her waist, and Waistells (share blue doves with Wintons and George's!!) have a horse "on a gallop." The hill was deciphered as a bank because, in real life, I rode the horse of Miss Peare until reaching a bank (sudden drop off) in the field, then turned back.

Waistells are listed with Wessels while Wissels/Whistle's (Somerset with Page-branch Payne's) share the Payne and Packer lozenges. Page's share the Winton Coat in other colors! Morley is pointing to Ms. Gabbard's exposure of the Hillary-Clinton dossier crimes. Packers/Pickers (share Payne / Wissel lozenges) are first known in Berkshire with Biks/Bikers. Morley was a biker! Biks/Bikers are in the colors and format of English Steins, the latter first known in Norfolk with Deering who in turn share the Bik/Biker buck head. Norfolk is also where Hips' are first known, and I pulled Miss Peare by her hips when pulling her by her waist.

It stands to reason that SLEEPing Beauty's wake scene is the Gabbard exposure. Wake's almost have the Coat of Mule's, the latter first known in Devon with Gabbard-connectable Gilberts. The latter give their squirrel a nut, connectable to the "wake-KNOT" of Wake's. The latter are first known in Lincolnshire with Gabbards. I can't see a Gabbard-Coat link to the wake Coast, however. Wake's were "Lords of the manor of Wilsford," and Wilsfords share the triple Peare / Parson / Center leopard faces. Peare and I were in the act of emBRACing at the last scene of the sleeping-bag dream, and Sleeping Beauty and I were embracing at the last scene of that dream. Bracebridge's (Lincolnshire with Wake's) have a "will" motto term.

Willfords (NOTTINGhamshire) have a the Wilsford Coat in another color. Peare and I were embracing on a deck, and Decks/Daggers share the red squirrel with Gilberts. The Gilbert-beloved Nuts are listed with NOTTINGs/Knutts (beside Brace's). The Wilford location of the Willfords is in Basford with the first-known Bunnys (and Ainsleys) while Bunns/Bone's are first known in Oxfordshire with Peare's and their Squirrel-beloved Tiens kin.

Wilsfords have the Peare Coat minus the latter's STARs, which are in colors reversed from the stars of Stairs/Stayers. Wilsfords are said to be first known in Lincolnshire or Wiltshire, the latter being where Pero-beloved Stars/STAIRRs are first known. I've proven that, on the night I first met miss Peare, we RUSHed up the STAIRS (to KISS) as a pointer to Rush's (Willford colors and near-format), who are in Center colors and format. We were at the La Paloma bar, and here I find that Willfords are first known in RUSHcliffe. Italian Paloma's share the Page dove, and Spanish Paloma's share the Pero pale bar. Kiss'/Cush's are a little interesting for being first known in Leicestershire with Perkins because Perkens are in Willford colors and format.

I don't remember loading Wilsfords before, who were right before my eyes, for years, in the Wake write-up. Wake's are first known in Lincolnshire with Wells.

I don't read all write-ups fully. As the Wake write-up has the following, I can now glean, for the first time, that the Wake fesses are related to the fesses of Wiles' and Camerons/Camera's, both sharing five, bunched arrows: "The surname Wake was first found in Lincolnshire where they held a family seat as Lords of the manor of Wilsford (Wivelesforde) and under tenants of Godfrey de CAMBRAi, and represented by Le Sire de Wake. HUGo Wach..." The latter character could be as per the hug at the wake scene of Sleeping Beauty. Wachs are listed with Walks (same place as Kilpatricks). Wassa's/Wace's have double bars (gemel) in the colors of the double Wiles bars.

The Wake Chief can be gleaned with Orrs/Ore's, and therefore as the roundels of Nellys as per a pointer to Nelly Ohr, part of the Steele-dissier crimes with her hubsnad, Bruce Ohr.

Shim-like Chimneys share the chevron of Boltons (Lancashire with Bolts), and McKinnie's/MCKimmie's are first known in Peebles too while their Kim/M'Shimmie branch is first known in Bude-like Bute, re-affirming the inclusion of Gobels to what could be a pointer to Tulsi Gabbard. The lightning bolt may have been a symbol of something at Armageddon, like the name of the anti-Christ. French Gobels/Gobe's have the Macey/Mace Coat but with one Masci wing, I assume. Gobels/Godbolts have a reflection of the Messey Coat.

I don't remember David Morley having a motor bike when I lived in Richmond Hill with him. But when I lived on a Marlin street, he popped in unexpectedly with his new wife, the church SECRETary. I never them again. I didn't know who the man on the motor bike was, while I was having the dream. I had to figure it out after the dream. Malls have a motor-like MOTRum location.

I have "bounced off my chest" in nine updates, the earliest being in the 5th update of December, 2016, in case you want to check (click Index link at top corner of this page) that I'm not making this story up. Mr. Ratcliffe did not become the DNI until 2020. The first time that I have "John Ratcliffe" in my files is the 4th update of July, 2019, when I said:

That night, DAN was in my COAT closet, asking a question...I think he was asking what the piece of equipment was hanging on the wall. It's my tankless water heater!!! [John Ratcliffe lives in HEATH]. Yes, this COAT closet where this heater hangs is where the mouse had entered my floor, and because DAN asked the question, I saw this is a pointer to Dan Coats' demise. It may not be surprising that Coats is leaving, but as I said, the mouse died right beside the rat trap that was suggested (in this update for the first time) as a pointer to John Ratcliffe!!! I'm amazed.

As the mouse entered directly under the heater, it may be a pointer again to Heather Samuelson and therefore to Coats' involvement in having her destroy Hillary's emails. Not only do Samuelsons use squirrels in both Shield and Crest, but the 17-total squirrels in my attic may have represented the 17 Intelligence agencies in the United States. Guess who's in charge of these 17 organizations? Dan Coats!!! Yes, Coats has been the director of National Intelligence, and its director is mandated to "serve as head of the sixteen-member United States Intelligence Community..."" In the attic, I caught and personally removed 16 squirrels in November/December, and the 17th entered the following summer or fall. Dan Coats is apparently the 17th squirrel, for he heads the 17th agency.

I had to update that story, about a year later, with Ratcliffe portraying the 17th. Dan Coats was the mouse that died in the mouse trap set beside the rat trap, and so the rat trap must portray Mr. Ratcliffe, the trapper. I couldn't have known that in 2019. Go get 'em, John, clean house.

Caiaphas and Annas

For new readers, Joseph Caiaphas, the high priest of Israel to incited the people to crucify Jesus, had married the daughter of the former high priest, Ananus/Annas/Hanan. I'll now take you back to the red-on-white CALF of Cavals, and to CALVarys/CAVerlys who are in turn in the colors and format of Sadducee-like Saddocks. I wonder who it was that named "Calvary," a term for the death of Jesus, but I'll bet that some descendants of Caiaphas and Annas wore that murder as their proud trophy. Perhaps the Caval / Calvary surnames arose from a distant variation of "Caiaphas" for that reason, after it had morphed from "Cauf" to "Calf."

Calvarys (Yorkshire with Howden) use owls such that Cavals of Howden reveal that the Howl variation of Owls was there. Howdens share the Chief-Shield colors of Annas'. The Caval calf is in the colors of the Morleys/Mauls who named Morley of Yorkshire, where Calvarys are first known. Morleys/Mauls share white scallops with French Mars/Maurs/MORE's, and then Scottish Mars (lions suspect as code for Pierleoni Jews) are first known in Yorkshire with this Morley location. I trace Mars to the Marsi of Abruzzo, and know how to trace other Abruzzo elements to Yorkshire.

The Caval calf is in the colors of most heraldic hands, for example the red-on-white hands of Hands/HANNs. The giant Annas star is in colors reversed. The giant Chaff GRIFFin is suspect from the Herod Agrippa's from a Griphin-like surname. Gripps/Grape's share the Coat, showing only a bend as likely code for the Pierleoni line to Bends, of Goats/Gothams, the latter first known in Nottinghamshire with Annas-branch Ainsleys. A giant goat, symbol of the Templar god, Baphomet, is with Kepke's who look like a hard form of "Caiaphas." Keppochs/Kippax's are first known in Yorkshire with Calvarys.

Kepke's share the border of Koops/Kupe's, tending to explain why Hands/Hanns are in Cup, Copp and Cope colors and format, and why Keeps (show almost nothing but a bend) are first known in Sussex with Coopers/Coppers who love the Leopards (Sussex with Calvary-connectable Saddocks) suspect with PierLEOni.

The Kepke goat is with Kidds, first known in Suffolk with Calvary-beloved Owls. Leopards are in the colors of Payens/Pagans, and the first Templar ruler, Hugh de Payens, is said to have married Elizabeth CHAPPES. Keeps have a "galley" while French Galleys are first known in Dauphine with Payens/Pagans (share Galley chevron). The Galleys place red roses on their chevron, symbol of Copps and Cope's; the latter are first known in Northamptonshire with Blanche's. English Galleys are first known in Yorkshire with Crone's and Scottish Pagans; the latter use a Craon-like crown, as do Crone's. Hugh de Payens was succeeded as grand master by Robert of Craon. English Pagans share the Kepke and Koop/Kupe border.

The heraldic "chief" looks like code for placing the Caiaphas line at the top of the Illuminati pyramid, so to speak. The heraldic Chief is at the top of the Shield. It smacks of "number one." The Annas Chief is blank, interesting where Blanche's are in the colors and format of the giant Annas star.

The Cope's and Copps differ from Hands/Hanns by placing a symbol on their chevron, which I'll guess is the fleur-de-lys of Birch's and Masci's from Masseys of Birkenhead. Birch's share the Coat, minus the Koop/Kupe border, of English Pagans. Birkenheads share the Coat of Sticks, and while Annas was the son of Seth, Seths are listed with CUP-using Shaws said to be from Stick-like "Sithech." The hand-with-dagger of Shaws/Seths (Payen/Pagan colors) is even in the Crest of English Pagans.

The upright and white Kepke / Kidd goat is in the Birkenhead Crest, and Birkenheads share the Coat of German Goods/Guths. Birkenheads are new to me, even though they were sitting in the wide-open of the Massey write-up. Tattons have: ""Robert Tatton of Kenworthy...married the heiress of William de WithenSHAW, alias Massy,..." Wittens/Whittens love the Owls, first known in Suffolk with Tate's.

It's interesting that Kepke, while I was his friend, befriended a guy, "Birk." I think it was his last name, but Kepke always called him, Birk. He met Birk about the time that Kepke and I both sold shoes in the same mall (age 18). God had arranged all sorts of events in my life to help me work out heraldic links.

Shoes are used by German Trips, from Trypillians of Kepke-like Kiev. I can prove that Keeps are from princess Maria of Kiev, Polish queen. I'm repeating this because English Trips share the crosslets of Howdens. Kepke met Miss Peare when he and I were selling shoes, and Pero's/Perino's (same place as Masci's) share the Payen/Pagan hexagram while Pierro's/Pero's are first known in Pavia with the Laevi Gauls that I think provided the Levite blood of Caiaphas and Annas.

Pierro's/Pero's share five of the six red roses of German Boets, and Sadducees had a House of Boethus. God wants me to expose the lines of those who killed Jesus, probably because they go to end-time anti-Christ rulers. Italian Boets are listed with Boys/Boeddu's whose giant bull is the "steer" of German Backs, and yet I saw that steer as a CALF many years ago. We can't argue with the facts, Calfs/Caufs and Cavals descended from Caiaphas.

Did you catch the significance of CUP-using Shaws/Seths? It begins to reveal that Shaws married the Koop/Kupe variation of Kepke's. The latter two share the border of SAWleys, and of Justine's, first known in Perthshire with Shaws/Seths, and while Seths are said to be from "Sithech," Koops/Kupe's use "candleSTICKs." That nails the Shaw link to Kepke elements.

Let's go back to Birkenhead-like Birch's sharing the Masci and Copp / Cope fleur-de-lys. Birch's are first known in Lancashire with Cave's. I had read that "Annas/Ananus" was "Hanan" to some Jews, and it just so happens that Hanans share the Massey, Vere and Eure/Ever quadrants while Vere's add the lone Annas star. Birch's are first known in old Salford with a Bury location, tending to explain why English Burys share the Birch fleur-de-lys. Burys put them on a bend, same as Masci's, and the Justine-connectable Wings in the Masci Coat are first known in Worcestershire with the Pattys in the patee crosses of Hanans. Irish Burys share the Vere/Weir and Eure/Ever boar.

English Burys are first known in Devon with Cheevers/Chivers who essentially share the triple goats of the neighboring Mallings. Devon is where Goat-loving Moline's/Mollins and Chiver-like, Moline-loving Chives' were once said to be first known. Cheevers/Chivers share a "foy" motto term with Irish Berks/Burghs who in turn share the cat with Chives'. Irish Berks/Burghs (share Ainsley / Burg cross) are from John de Burgo, ancestor of Meschins. I'll guess that Burys and Burrows/Burghs (Hampshire with Copps) are from de Burgo too. While Rothes'/Wraths/Wreths are first known in Malling of Kent, Burrows/Burghs use "wreaths."

The red hand of Ulster can be suspect from Annas and Seth. Ulsters/HULsters look like they borrow from the Coat of Hand-connectable Cups, but use the colors of Hulls (Yorkshire with Keppochs / Calvarys) because the latter are in Ulster/Hulster colors and format. Allisons/ALLISTERs share the Hull / Hall/Hole / Holly dog, wherefore it seems that we've discovered Ulster branches.

Scottish Allisons, said to descend from MacDonalds, who had a Keppoch branch, have a motto term, "preVAILs," and Vails are listed with Velis' in the motto of Chaff-beloved Griffins, explaining why Vile's/Veals use calves. Let's not argue with the facts. Vile's/Veals are in Saleman colors and format, and Salemans / Salmons were from Surrey, where Truths/Trots are first known in the "Truth prevails" motto of Allisons. It speaks of Salome Boethus, a daughter of the Sadducees the line of which mixed marital blood with royal Herods.

The Maezaei Illyrians were beside the Ceraunii Illyrians, and Crauns/Crane's come up as "Craon." English Crone's (Yorkshire again) share the Massey fleur-de-lys. Crone's are in the colors and format of Croms, and the latter were once said to be first known in BERKshire with Boethus-like Beetle's who in turn share the lozengy of Scottish Crone's. Crone's and Crauns/Craons share the crown with BOTTels (Lancashire with Cave's and Birch's/Berch's).

Berkshire is where Windsors are first known who share the crosslets of Howdens. Calf-branch Cavals were at Howden. Windsors use the saltire of Geralds in colors reversed who in turn have a "Crom aBOO" motto suspect with the Bo variation of Italian BOETs/Boeddu's. See that? The latter's Beauty branch are first known in Dorset with Chaffs.

The current royal family changed its title from "Saxe-Coburg-GOTHa" to "Windsor," and here it becomes suspect that queens Elizabeth I and II were named after Elizabeths expected in the descent of Elizbeth Chappes. "ElizaBETH" may have been a name of choice for Boethus liners. Gothams/Goats are expected in the Templar god. Goat heads are with Moline's, first known in Devon with CALVin-like Colvins who in turn have a moline cross. Devon is also where Coffins/Colvins/CHAFens are first known, suspect with Chaffinch's/Chaffins.

The Colvin moline cross is in the colors of the Calvin/Colvin cross, and the latter surname shares the motto of Colvins and Faucet-branch Face's to explain the "FACTis" motto term of Coffins/Colvins/Chafens. The motto includes "Vinces" while Vince's (same place as Beach's/Bechs) list Finch's expected in "ChafFINCH/ChafFIN." Fins/Feins and Finchems share the triple fesses of Beaks, the latter first known in Dorset with Chaffinch's'/Chaffins and Chaffs.

The Faucet castle was built by Saer de Quincy while Sforza's, first known in Rome with Pierleoni Jews, use a "quince," tending to explain why Fiens/Finis' share the Sforza lion. Quince's are first known in Northamptonshire with Cope's and Face's, which is how we can know that Face's were a Faucet branch.

Godfrey III, son of GOTHelo, protected the Pierleoni Jews from a vatican backlash, and Godfrey's grandson became the first ruler of Templar Jerusalem i.e. at the time of Hugh de Payens. It insists that the Pierleoni Jews were behind the invasion of Jerusalem due to descending from the chief priests of the Jerusalem temple prior to its destruction.

Craons are first known in Suffolk with Kidds who share the Kepke goat, and the latter's is in the colors and format of Goths/Gothels (Thuringia with German Roets), making the Kepke / Koop/Kupe line obvious from or to Gothelo. The giant Goth/Gothel hexagram, colors reversed from the hexagram now on the Israeli flag, is shared by Hagars, first known in Perthshire with Shaws/Seths who link to the Koop/Kupe candleSTICKs. Keppochs, by the way, share sheaves with Sticks, though Keppochs are in Caval / Calf/Cauf colors.

Kidds have the Kepke goats comBATTANT, and Battants, first known in Somerset with Scottish Roets and Sticks, are also Badens while the Arms of Baden is the Keep bend for the related reason that Varangians of Kiev named the Veringers of Baden.

Let me spell this out because the line of Godfrey III ruled in Lorraine, also called Lotharingia. Richeza of Lotharingia was mother to Casimir of Poland, and he married Maria of Kiev to explain why Lorraine's share the Keep bend. Yet Casimirs have that bend by use of a red antler, symbol also of Veringers of Baden. So, the Kepke's, suspect from "Caiaphas," are linking smack to the line of Goat-like Gothelo, making Baphomet look like he's secretly Joseph Caiaphas.

At the same time that Kepke was my teen friend, so was Dennis Quinn. His surname is like the SFORZa Quince, and English Dennis', sharing the Battant/Baden Coat but in Calf/Cauf colors and format, are first known in Lancashire with FORTs and Cave's.

One Quinn Coat has a giant pegasus in the colors of the giant Caffer/MacGODFREY horse, but also in the colors of the Coffee/Coffer CUPs. See that? Cup-branch Copps are first known in Hampshire with Griffin-loving Caplans while Griffin loving Chaffs share the Chief-Shield colors of Capes'. Coopers/Coppers are first known in Sussex with Keeps, Cofferts and Courts/Coverts. A giant horse in the colors of the giant Caval calf is with Keips. The Caffer/MacGodfrey horse adds a "knight" possibly due to English Knights being first known in Suffolk with Kidds. Kitts and their Kite/Keit branch are in Payen/Pagan colors and format.

Kite's/Keits are first known in Norfolk with cat-using Keats, suggesting that Kidds descended from Keith Catti (East Lothian with Quince-related Faucets), explaining why Kepke and I became golf caddies at age 14. Caddys (Yorkshire with Keppochs) have a Chief in the colors and format of the Keith Chief. Keith-branch Kettle's are first known in Perthshire with Shaws/Seths.

As you can imagine, we already have enough surnames to topic that, sooner or later, the Caiaphas and Annas lines will marry just about all other surnames (marriages permitted legal, heraldic transfers such that heraldry becomes a tracking system). Don't freak out if it bumps into your surnames. Croms and Berks/Burghs use the cat, and so the Keith Catti are going to bump into the mountain cats of Chives' of Tarves. Tarves' share the fitchee of cat-using Cattans (Norfolk with Kite's/Keits). The six, black Tarves fitchees are with Blondville's, first found in Suffolk with Blonds and Kidds.

It was Kepke's and Lorraine's blond hair that caused me to find Blonds, and this squares with the Budini of Kiev, whom HERODotus said had blond hair. Herodotus pre-dated Herods, and so, perhaps, they descended from his family. Herods/Haralds/Hurls, suspect with HERLuin de Conteville, son of John de Burgo above, share the fesse of Forez's who in turn have a Tarves-linkable "travers" motto term. Travers/Traves' (Lancashire with Cave's) share the scallops of French Calvins/CauVAINs said to be from "De Cauville, in the department of Calvados." That's close enough to the home of the Bessin's Meschins who share the Calvin scallops too, and who descended from Herluin de Conteville. Wayne-related Fiens/VAINs are first known in Monmouthshire with Calvary-connectable Howells.

It's making the naming of the Calvados department suspect from "Caiaphas." Cauville is near FERTE-Mace, explaining why Maceys/Mace's share the Fien/Vain and Wayne gauntlet. Cauville is in the Caen province while Caens (Dorset with Chaffs) share the FRETTy Shield of Cave's. The implied facts are blatant.

Caens share the Peare leopard face, and have a "PERimus" motto term. Peare's are first known in the same place as Harcourts and Clintons (share six Blondville fitchees) while Cauville is in the "canton of THURY-Harcourt." It just so happens that Herodotus moved from Caria to THURII.

The Clinton stars, in the colors of the Pero stars, are "pierced" while Piers/Pierce's share the rare, wavy chevron with Boet-beloved Fish's. Piers/Pierce's, were, along with Percivals, related to Waleran de Percival of Levi-like Leavells. Piers/Pierce's, Percivals and Leavells are first known in Somerset (beside Caens) with Pilate-connectable Pile's sharing the Caen / Peare leopard face. Pilotte's/Pilate's are first known in Burgundy with Chaff-connectable Fins/Feins. "FINem" is a motto term of English Fishers who share the Chief-Shield colors of Annas'. "FiNEM" is suspect also with having the Neme's/Name's, first known in Lincolnshire with Fish's and Pilotte's/Pillows. The latter, along with Pellets, share the Shaw/Seth cups, what don't we understand about this? Pontius Pilate handed Jesus to Caiaphas' brutal will. Christine's/Christians use the same cups, and God perhaps chose Christine Peare to be Kepke's ladyfriend for a couple of years during the time that we were friends.

Pero's are first known in Piedmont with Pelosi's/Pilati's, and the latter's Column kin are first known in Argyllshire with Herods/Haralds/Hurls. The latter share a gold fesse with Herls/Hurls (Meschin colors and format), suggesting a Herod-line merger with the line of HELRuin de Conteville. He married the daughter of "the tanner" of Falaise, and Cauville under discussion is said to have been in the "arrondissement of Falaise," now incorporated in the arrondissement of Caen (write-ups at houseofnames include fairly-old quotes).

Cauville is in Thury, and, zowie, Wikipedia says that Thurii (southern Italy) was part of the city of "Copia." Might proto-Cope's have been there? THURstons use hunting horns while Horns are also Orne's while Ferte-Mace is in Orne. There's a "heron" in the Thurston Crest, and Herons are super, not only because they share the Horn/Orne Coat, but because they are first known in Northumberland (in THORnton to be exact) with Reds/Reeds in turn having a Pax COPIA" motto!!!

Thorntons are said to have been from "Peter Thornton, Secretary to the Blundells." Thurstons are first known in Suffolk with Clinton-connectable Blondville's. Blundville's were directly from Meschins. Blundells (Lancashire with Cave's, Thornton, and Tour-branch Towers) have 10 of the 11 billets of French Bassets while Owl-line Oullette's were at Ouilly-le-Basset in Falaise! It's right-near CAUVILLE. CAVAL-branch Calvarys use OWLs, and Howells have the triple towers of English THORs/TOURs in colors reversed! This has Thurii/Copia all over it, and so it's connecting the line of Caiaphas and Pontius Pilate to Thurii elements. Thors/Tours are even in Calf/Cauf colors and format.

Mont Pilat is neat St. Etienne while Etienne's share the billets of French Bassets, the latter first known in Forez with Faucet-like Fauch's. The Forez hills are near Mont Pilat, and the Faucet castle is near the first-known Fallis'. I trace the Perdrix peak of Mont Pilat to "Perth(shire)," where Shaws/Seths are first known who share the Pilotte and Pellet cups.

I can trace Cups/Cope's/COLPs (Aberdeenshire with PEARtree's/Patria's and Scottish Reeds) to the COLAPis/Kupa river of Croatia, and yet the motto of Reds/Reeds are telling that Kupa-river people named Copia of southern Italy. The Red/Reed motto can also be for Anchor-loving Packs (Sussex with Coopers and Keeps), and then KAUFmans use the giant anchor.

Peartree's/Patria's were formerly first known in Kincardineshire (beside Scottish Reeds) with Thurys/Torys and Fothes'/Fette's/Fitts. I've known for years that the latter have a "cornuCOPIA," but I don't recall knowing that Thurii was at Copia! Fette-like Feets share the English Pavia Coat while Pierro's/Pero's/Petri's are first known in Pavia. Mark this link between the Laevi of Pavia and Thurii elements.

We clearly see here that motto terms and symbols can not only be codes for past relations, but even for favored, ancestral locations where surnames are taken from locations. Nobles did this routinely, not especially good for tracking because it hid their true surnames and replaced them with their locations. Where a location was named after someone's surname, someone else came along later to rule that location, and they could have adopted it as a surname without being related to it by blood.

The Thornton write-up: "Thornton [of Lancashire] was held by William Banastre,..." The Meschin write-up: "Ranulph, 3rd Earl of Chester, who was descended from the Viscounts of Bessin, in the Department of Calvados in Normandy, and who held the honor of Skipton, in Yorkshire, from Richard Banistre, a Norman Baron of Cheshire..." Later in the latter's write-up: "William de Meschines, the first Baron of COPEland,..." The purple lion head in the Thornton Crest is thus likely the one of Meschin-married Skiptons of Craven. Cravens trace to Rijeka near the Colapis/Kupa river, near also to the Maezaei on the Shaw-like Sava river. Savage's/Sava's (Cheshire) are suspect at SAVIGliano, where Pelosi's/Pilati's are first known.

Back to French Calvins/Cauvins sharing the Meschin scallops, for they look related to the Palin and Plain/Platter Coat. Palins share the Buchan lion, and are thus suspect with the Buchanan lion too because ancient Buxentum was at PALINurus, both at the bay of Laus near Thurii. Buchans named Buchan...in Aberdeenshire with the first-known Cups/Cope's/Colps. In the write-up of Millens/Milans, Buchanans are said to have been kin of Millens/Milans who share their giant lion. Cauville at Thury-Harcourt takes us to the Thury/Tory surname with giant tower, which recalls the giant tower of Murena's/Moreno's. Morano is a location on the Sybaris river, and Thurii had been the new name of a Sybaris location at that river. Morano is beside Saracena, and Saraca's have lived in Croatia's Ragusa, also called, "Laus(a)," which helps to argue that peoples from the Colapis/Kupa river had also been at Copia of Sybaris. Reds/Reeds have a "copia" motto term, and Saraca-line Sharks have a "REDit" motto term.

Plus, Welsh Davids, kin of Aids/Ade's, have a "Pax en copia" motto, and Aids/Ade's are in the colors and format of Roddens/Rodhams, the latter first known in Northumberland with Red/Reeds. The write-up of Morleys/Mauls has Maule's allied to the family of King David, and English Morleys with Morlands/Mauleys share the jessant leopard face with Aids/Ade's.

One can trace Aids/Ade's to Ada of Warenne because she married king David's son, and she was from Surrey while Surreys are also Sarks. The Surrey surname might thus have been from Saracena but made to reflect "Thurii." The Tate's expected in the Shark motto are first known in Suffolk with THURstons, or, in the case of Scottish Tate's, they are first known in Berwickshire with Aids/Ade's.

Warrens have a "Leo" motto term while German Leo's have a Pier-like variation.

King David was the son of Malcolm III, and Malcolms/Columns are first known in Argyllshire with Herods/Haralds, which could suggest the latter to descend from the family of Herodotus. This throws a monkey wrench into the Herod surname. The Welsh David Coat is almost with Gabbards, and the latter are said to have had a branch at Winton, where Geddys are first known who have the Herod/Harald fesse in colors reversed. This Winton location is in Hampshire, where Hab-beloved Hawks are first known who are in the "hawk's lure" of Herods/Haralds. Habs are firstly known in Berwickshire with Aids/Ade's. We also read of "Nicholas de Gidd, Huntingdonshire," which works where Ada of Warenne married Henry, earl of Huntingdon, and so it's interesting that Sharks are first known in Tyrone with Irish Henrys and Irish Hamels.

Hamels are mentioned because the write-up of Warenne-like Warrens has Hamelin, earl of Warenne in Surrey. Warrens are said to be first known in Sussex, with Hams and Hammers too who are both in the colors of Dutch Hamels. Hammers love the Dolphins who had family in Surrey. Hams love the Salmons of Surrey suspect from Salome Boethus (daughter of king Herod II), Dolphins are now said to be first known in Cumberland with Salmons. It just so happens that the Boethus line, while suspect to Beauty-branch Boets, goes to English Hamelins because they share the Beauty Coat!

Now that Rush's/Rish's are said to be first known in Surrey with Hamelin of Warenne (son of Geoffrey Plantagenet), I can use their Rosco/Risco branch because they are first known in Cornwall with an early Hamelin of Cornwall, who may have been Hamelin of Devon too, excellent because Beauty-related Walerans are first known in Devon. The point is, Rosco's/Risco's have the Hamilton cinquefoils in colors reversed, and Sleeping Beauty was the wife of the late Hamilton Kilpatrick. Thus, God must have framed the Sleeping-Beauty dream to connect even with the line of the Boethus Sadducees. Warrens are first known in Sussex with Calvary-connectable Saddocks.

Saddocks love the Rye variation of Rise's, and the latter are first known in Norfolk with the Risings that were in Sleeping Beauty's rising scene, after she fell to SLEEP, which traced excellently to Rhizon, near the SELEPitanoi, and Rhizon is smack beside Kotor, where Wikipedia's Saraka article has the Shark-line Saraca's before they moved to Ragusa. The Sleeps happen to share two, ermined-white fesses with Irish Hamels, first known in Tyrone with Sharks! BINGO. I win.

Also, French Hamels share the two stars in Chief with Boets/Boeddu's.

It is now very curious or revealing that the Crest of Irish Hamels is shared with Sewers. I had no reason to mention this until loading Scottish Hamels, who almost have the Mosters/MIST/Master Coat. I MISSED the RED ball near the corner pocket, and shot the paper PLANE into the pocket for a SEWER! The red ball can now be understood as the Reds/Reeds from Copia, smack-near Saracena! Pockets (Lincolnshire with Tankerville's) have the Hamilton, Dog, and Tankerville cinquefoil in colors reversed. Hamiltons use a Shaw-like saw, and Shaws are first known in Perthshire with Dogs. A dog was in the mouth of a shark at the start of the Sleeping Beauty dream, suggesting that Dogs trace to Saracena.

Ahh, just remembered: Guiscard-related Orrs/Ore's, first known in Renfrewshire with Hamiltons, have another cornuCOPIA!!!

Scottish Hamels are first known with the family of Turstan Hamel. Plains/Platters (Suffolk with Thurii-suspect Thurstons) almost have the Palin Coat while Palinurus was near Saracena too! Palinurus, Sybaris and Morano are at the bottom of this map of Lucania. Recall how Blondville's (Sussex with Thurstons) worked to topic, for "Blanda" can be seen between Laus and Palinurus. Blands share a bend-with-pheons (different colors) with Thistle's, and Dogs have a thistle in Crest.

Therefore, my sewer shot does relate to the shark at the start of the Sleeping Beauty dream. The giant lion of Palins (Dorset with Beautys) got suspect with the Buchan lion heads, and the latter's Coat is in Beauty colors and format, suggesting House-of-Boethus elements in and around Buchan. Buchans share the sun in Crest with Blonds.

Blands are in Saleman colors and format. The "veRITE" motto term of Blands can get us to English Rite's, first known in Sussex with Coopers, Hams and Hammers while Rite's have the double fesses of Scottish Hamels in colors reversed. Scottish Rite's are first known in Berwickshire with Aids/Ade's, expected from Ada of Warenne. As I'm seeing it on a fast look upon family trees, Ada's brother was father to the wife of Hamelin of Warenne. It just so happens that the latter was the paternal grandson of Fulk, king of Jerusalem.

Fulk became king because he married the daughter of Baldwin II, king of Jerusalem. To my surprise, it doesn't look like Baldwin II was related to Baldwin I, the latter being the first official king of Jerusalem, from the line of Gothelo mentioned above. Baldwin II descended from Manasses I, first count of Rethel. The latter's name sounds Jewish. Contrary to what you may think, I don't go deeply into Templarism. I assumed that Baldwin II was at least closely related to Baldwin I.

Wikipedia's article on Manasses II of Rethel: "He was the father of Manasses III, who succeeded him, and perhaps Doda, the wife of Godfrey III, Duke of Lower Lorraine." The latter had also married BEATrice of Bar.

Square brackets mine today:

"In January 1058, as a partisan of the newly elected Pope Nicholas II, Leo had the gates of the Leonine City thrown open for Godfrey [III], former duke of Lower Lorraine, and his wife, Beatrice [of Bar], marchioness of Tuscany [home of Taddei's]. Godfrey immediately possessed the Tiber Island [of the Pierleoni] and attacked the Lateran, forcing Benedict X to flee on 24 January. Leo allied himself with the reformers..."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierleoni_family

It's one of the biggest Templar secrets, right? It's the guts of the Templars, the Pierleoni Jews. At the article, the Arms of Pierleoni are shown as a lion having black-and-gold checks in the colors of the checks of German Bills, Sawyers and Baez's/Pelaiz's. I don't know these checks for any other surnames, off-hand. English Bills ("patria") are first known in Somerset with Piers/Pierce's, Church's suspect in the Sawyer motto, Roet-branch Payne's, and Roet-connectable Jews/Chews. French Payne's share the fesse of Italian Leo's. German Leo's/PYRzewski's may have the Pero/Perino hexagrams. Note how Sawyers look like kin of Marks, suspect from the Marici co-founders of Pavia. [The week after writing here, I found Whitneys with the same checks.]

Again, German Boets/Bute's have a good Coat reflection of Pavia's PIERro's/Pero's. English Pavia's share the martlets of Peare-related Thames'.

I'm pretty sure that, in the past, I've wrongly named pope Leo IX, after whose name the Pierleoni went, as Leo Benedict. Rather, Leo Benedict, not a pope, was the founder of the Pierleoni. The article above doesn't give Leo Benedict's birth name, which I would like to have. Why did Leo the Jew use "Benedict? The date of 1058 in the quote above was about the time that pope Benedict IX died. He was from Tuscany. Perhaps he explains Leo Benedict's name. I'm no expert on Pierleoni.

As heraldry is from Templar / Crusader elements, one can investigate whether Benedicts, Bennets and Bends are from Pierleoni. Bennets share the "scaling ladder" with English Trips while German Trips are first known in Hamburg with lion-using Leo's/Pyrzewski's. Trips can be connected to Keeps, the latter first known in Sussex with Leopards/Lipperts. Giant-lion Lippers/Lipps are first known in Westphalia with the Bar-le-Duc line that Godfrey III married.

Bars of Bar-le-Duc were in BRUNswick (I read this), and brown-cat Scottish Lipps are first known in Aberdeenshire with Peartree's/Patria's and Caiaphas-like Chives'. Beatrice of Bar had family ties to Tuscany, where Bruno's are first known. Scottish Lipps shares the "cat-a-mountain" with Chives', and both have the same motto, translated with "force" while Force's have leopards.

Leo Benedict named his son, Pier Leoni. Peter. The Hamiltons above are first known in Renfrewshire with Peter Pollock, builder of a castle at Rothes. Lion-using English Rothes'/WRETHs/WRITHs look like "Rethel," very interesting. There are many heraldic wreaths.

Wreath's look like they apply to Rethel because they are first known in Inverness-shire with Gibbs while Gabberts/Gibberts, ignoring their lion, have the Guenet Coat in colors reversed, that being a surname first known in Belgium i.e. near Rethel. I've known for years that Guenets come up as "Gone," as do Gows/McGoo's, the latter first known in Inverness-shire! Lookie there. However, Wreaths are listed with non-Wreath-like variations. Like many other surnames, Wreath variations got hardened with a capital C from their "Mac" prefix. For example, the Reath > MacReath surname has become MacCreath.

Plus, Rothes'/Wreths/Wriths (once said to be first known in Shropshire with Baldwins and the Dol Alans) are first known in Kent with the Gaunts sharing the Gone/Guenet bend. Dols incorporate the Dutch Gaunt/Ghent Coat. The Arms of Ghent (Belgium) uses a "maiden" or "virgin," and both Maids and Virgins (Kent with Gaunts) share the Wreath / Stewart lion. The lion in the Arms of Ghent is in both colors of the Rothes/Wreth/Wriths lion heads, white like the Rita lion. I've just learned that Riths and Reths are listed with Wreaths. I'm seeing Rieti's imperial elements that destroyed the Jerusalem temple!

Emperor Vespasian, that is. He could have collected much gold from that invasion. Surely, his soldiers didn't overturn block after block but because Vespasian ordered them to find gold hidden in the blocks. Flavius Josephus, who captained a Jewish army against Vespasian, betrayed his Israelite people and made a deal with Vespasian. he claimed to be of the priestly class. How many other priests paid Vespasian for mercy and freedom in return? Did their children include Pierleoni of Rome?

Pharisees are suspect by me in naming giant-lion Ferrari's, same lion as with Sforza's, first known in Rome. I had read an implication that Ferrara wasn't named until after 70 AD, because, at that time, it was called, "Forum ALLIENi." That looks like the Alans/Alliens. Ha, Liens/Leons/Leonards, in the format of Fallis' and Sharks, share the giant Ferrari lion, and Fallis' share the lion of Rieti-like Rita's, first known in Rome too. Sharks have a "REDit" motto term.

For what it's worth to topic, Gards/Guards are first known in Kent with Gaunts while Lingers, sharing the Gaunt bars and Crest, are also LinGUARDs. Then, English Line's are first known in Oxfordshire with the GARDners having griffin heads colors reversed from the Gard/Guard griffins.

Peter Pollock was apparently named after the Pollok location at which he lived, at Renfrew. But what surname did he have before adopting that location-name? One Peter surname shares the raven with German Rothes'/Rothchilds. There is a Jewish Pollock surname. Was Peter from rulers of Rethel, and were the latter of Pierleoni Jews?

Wikipedia: "The first rulers of Rethel might have governed under the Abbey of Saint-Remi and later independently,..." French Hamels: "They branched to...St.-Remy in Champagne where they were elevated to the Counts du Hamel." It appears that Hamelin of Warenne's line was very Templar-Jerusalem. Warenne's were also Varenne's, and Varenne's/Verone's use "black birds" but show as ravens. Verona's are first known in Ile-de-France with Chappes' and Levi's.

Wikipedia's article on the character, "Pier Leoni" (not the Pierleoni article): "Pierleone held the Theatre of Marcellus, Tiber Island, and the Castel Sant'Angelo, fortress of the popes. He was the greatest man in Rome in his time, the grandson of a Jew of Trastevere. His large marble sarcophagus...Of these children, he left several sons: Leo, Peter (later Antipope Anacletus II), Jordan (later Patrician of the Commune of Rome), Roger, and Huguizon. It is said that his daughter married Roger I of Sicily." That's Roger Guiscard.

Repeat: "Ahh, just remembered: Guiscard-related Orrs/Ore's, first known in Renfrewshire with Hamiltons [and Pollocks], have another cornuCOPIA!!!" Bald-branch Bauds, both sharing the Renfrew ship, are first known in Stirlingshire with Saracen-involved Guiscards. Saracens share the Baud crescent. French Bauds (look related to Goths/Gothelo's) are first known in Auvergne with Bouillons, and a ruler of Bouillon was brother of Baldwin I.

I trace "Pollock" and Reeds with Roets together to Vespasia Polla of Rieti, daughter-in-law of Petro. Giant-lion Rita's/RITAS' (Rome) can be expected in the "veRITES" motto term of Calvarys, though Rites'/Rite's (Rita colors) have leopard faces. Rite's are listed with Wreath-like Write's/Wrights.

Rethel elements may have named the Readys because they share the swan with the Arms of Boulogne, and because Baldwin I was from nobles of Boulogne, rulers of Lorraine. I figured that "Rethel" could have developed from "Rothley," and checking, there is a Rothley Coat with besants colors reversed from those on the Arms of Boulogne. Redleys/Radleys (another "phoenix") have a Coat like that of Ridells, and Rads/Redlers share the hexagram of Goths/Gothels, expected from Gothelo, ancestor of the Boulogne county.

Readys (Kepke colors) are in the motto of Lawrence's, potentially from rulers of Lorraine. Mr. Kepke was born, Lawrence, and Keeps were kin of Lorraine's, the latter first known in Northumberland with Reds/Reeds. Lorraine-like Lorne's are first known in Aberdeenshire with Cups, and a giant cup is with Laurie's/Larrys who in turn share laurel with Lorraine's. Lorraine elements were at Lanarkshire, where Swans are first known, beside the Baldwin-like Balds. Lanarks mention Lorne's.

Readys use the scimitar, recalling that I trace Tancred-branch TANKERville's to "Tanagra," at Schimatari of Boethus-like Boeotia (Greece). In Wikipedia's article on Baldwin II of Rethel, we find that his ally was Tancred of Antioch, grandson of a royal Guiscard of Sicily who in turn battled against Saracens, though some Saracens joined him. Lawrence's have a RAGully pattern, suspect partly with Ragusa elements. There were Saraca's of Croatian Ragusa, but also a Ragusa of Sicily.

Schimatari elements are suspect to Mole-related Schims/SCHIENs and Mole-loving Shake's. Schims/Schiens and Skins/Scans/Skene's are both first known in Aberdeenshire with Cups, Scottish Reeds, and Buchans. The latter have "The sun SHINing on a sunflower," and German Shine's are listed with SCHEINs who share the fleur-de-lys of Plains/Platters while I say that Buchans share the Palin lion. Irish Shine's (probably Sion/Sine elements) share the red hands of Hands/Hanns.

Rethel-like Ridells have a "Hope" motto term while Hope's/Hopers are first known in Shropshire with Baldwins, which suddenly makes the latter look like they are from Baldwin II of Rethel. Ridells even share "ears of rye" with Saddocks! This can explain why Rethel elements were chosen to continue on the Jerusalem throne. Hoppers/Happers (beside Cave-related Caens) share the tower of Hills, and Shake's (Lancashire with Cave's, etc.) don't use moles, but mole HILLs.

The Share's in the Ridell motto are first known in Sark-line Surrey, and share black fitchees with Kenite-like Kennedys, first known in Ayrshire with Cunninghams who in turn have a "SHAKEfork." I see the Biblical, Shake-like Shechemites, potential associates / partners of Kenites, at the naming of Schimatari. As Moses married a Kenite, it's possible that Hope's / Hoppers knew of some Kenites in Shropshire, where Moses' are first known. Kennedys have an "Avise" motto term while I can trace Avis'/Avisons to Avesnes on the Helpe river, some 50-60 miles from Rethel. I can prove that Avesnes is of the Avezzano's, first known in Sardinia, where we find Sant'Antioco, named after Antioch, where Tancred above ruled (he became a ruler of Galilee).

Baldwin-like Balds are first known in Peebles-shire with McKINNEYs! That works, suggesting that Baldwins of Shropshire were Kenites from Baldwin of Rethel, and that Kenite liners there arranged a Moses surname from some other variation. Kenites are suspect in Boeotia, and McKinney-branch Kims are first known in BUTE. German Boets are also Bute's. The Budini of Kiev get suspect from Boeotians.

McKinneys/McKENNys (Ham colors) have a "salmon" in Crest that has got to be proof that the line of Salome Boethus had some Kenite blood. Irish McKinneys are in the colors and format of Cup-loving Coffee's/Coffers. Mythical Morgan le Fay of Avalon = Bute must be code for Morgans, who have a giant lion in the colors of the McKinney/McKenny lion heads.

The "prest" motto term of Scottish McKinneys could be for the line of Priestlys because they share a cockatrice (different color) with Baldwins. Priestlys look like Abreu/Abruzzo elements, land of the Marsi of Maruvium, of the Merovingian Franks. This now gets me to the Marici co-founders of Pavia along with the Laevi Gauls. I trace the latter to Lupus LAEVillus of Cetis (1st century AD), and Cetis is where the Kennati priests of Ajax operated. They have got to have been from Biblical Kenites, in merger with the Levite blood to the Sadducees that I see from the Laevi. The latter were in northern Italy shortly before the Sadducees crept out of the Maccabees.

As per the Marici, were now go to the House of La Marck, the Arms of which share the checkered fesse of Boeotia-like Boyds, first known in Shropshire with Baldwins and Hope's. The latter share the besants of Cetis-like Cedes'/Seeds/Seats. We read: "Later collateral lines [of La Marck] became dukes of Bouillon, a title which was later inherited by the House of La TOUR d'Auvergne, princes of SEDAN, dukes of Nevers, counts of RETHEL and so forth." Bouillons are first known in Auvergne, and the Auvergne surname shares the Tour tower. Godfrey de Bouillon was the brother of king Baldwin I of Jerusalem.

Seed-like Sedans/Siddens and their Seaton/Sitten branch named Sitten at Sion, and the "sino" motto term of Sedans tends to prove it. Godfrey de Bouillon was ruler of a Priory of Sion. The Arms of Boulogne has a swan. I was able to trace Swans to king Sweyn FORKbeard, and it just so happens that "OVER fork over" is a motto term of Cunninghams, the ones with a "SHAKEfork" in their Shield. Cunninghams (Ayrshire with Forkers and Scottish Boyds) likely share the Crest of English Cnuts because king Cnut was a son of Sweyn Forkbeard.

Overs/Offers look like they could have been Hovers/Hoffers, and the latter are first known in Westphalia, and so let's quote again from the link above: "Originally liensmen (a type of vassal) of the archbishops of Cologne in the Duchy of Westphalia, the [Marck] family ruled the County of Mark,..." Westphalia is also where Ducks are first known who named Bar-le-Duc in Lorraine.

The "parent house" of La Marck" was the Ezzonids, the same that put out Richeza of Lorraine, the line to Keeps and Lorraine's, but also to Button-related Rich'/Richess' (bottony crosses), first known in Hampshire with Bottons/Budins and Botters/Bodins. It looks Budini, yes, but also Boeotian. Herodotus claimed that the Geloni partners of the Budini were from Greece, and the Geloni may have been Alans / Elons, kin of Boyds (Shropshire with Alans).

The Mark area under discussion was at Hamm, and Hams share the "salmon" with McKinneys/McKennys and Maccabee-like MacAbee's. Salome Boethus. The Arms of Hamm shared the fesse-with-checks of La Marck, but you can find it in different colors with Alan-line Stewarts, and with two Mark surnames. Jewish Marks/Marx's use the symbol in all three colors of the Boyds. The Arms of Croatia shares the Marck / Hamm checks too.

In a 2017 update, it's recorded: "There was 'Cardinal Jules [Giulio = Julius] Raymond Mazarin, Duke of Rethel, Mayenne and Nevers." He's given red BUTTONs at his portrait,..." A man with red shirt and gold buttons is with Tous'/Tosini's, first known in Florence (near Botters/Botini's) with Taddei's; the latter share the Bouillon flory, and add a potent cross, symbol of de-Bouillon's Jerusalem. Taddei-like Tattons share a white greyhound in Crest with Ridells.

Unrestricted Solar Waves

Two updates ago, I discussed things about the solar wind that establishment goofballs never talk about. You never hear their youtube stooges talking about light waves through the solar wind, because the goofballs don't want anyone to know about those waves. But it's a fact, undeniable, that waves must be penetrating that wind, for it consists of material particles. One cannot cause action or motion in a gaseous material without true waves (as opposed to currents) going forth through it.

However, waves through a gas held down by gravity will expire much sooner than waves through free electrons in the solar wind, for the latter is not held down to any surface by gravity. Gas atoms held down by gravity stifle wave travel. But a wave is free to travel without restriction through the solar wind. In fact, solar-wind electrons move away from the sun, the opposite of being held down by solar gravity. There is nothing to restrict the wave until it collides with a material. google AI:

Solar wind, a continuous stream of charged particles and magnetic fields flowing outward from the Sun's corona, interacts with planets and other bodies in the solar system, creating various phenomena including plasma waves and shock waves. These WAVES [caps mine] are disturbances in the solar wind plasma and magnetic field that are generated by various processes, including the interaction of fast and slow solar wind streams and interactions with planetary magnetic fields.

The mention of those waves are not true waves. As you can see, the quote refers to the FLOW of solar-wind particles, but a flow is not a true wave. yet, there must be true waves through the solar wind, wherefore: why don't we hear of them?

When a bomb explodes on earth, there is a true wave through the air. It can break windows or kill bodies. I'm not talking about the flow of air from the bomb, but a true wave, defined as one air particle pushing neighboring air particles. The wave is pushed energy. Not jarginish enough for you? Should I invent a fancy name for this push? It's a push. East to understand. The push transfers. Water waves are pushed water molecules.

A sound wave is a push through air atoms. Sound happens only when atoms are moved. The moving atoms transfer their push, atom-to-atom. It's an atomic push. There are free electrons in the air, and sound waves can push them too, but, apparently, the electrons are incapable of producing sound in the ear. The electrons are not set rigid in the air. But when gravity pulls air atoms downward, they form a rigid grid that allows animal flight. If not for gravity, birds could not fly in air. If there were no gravity, air atoms would disperse outer-spaceward, offering no resistance to a bird's wings.

But free electrons are not pulled by gravity. Most atmospheric electrons originate in the solar wind. I explained, two updates ago, why the goofballs are lying to the world when they claim that solar-wind electrons get hijacked by the earth's magnetic field (which does not exist) such that the solar wind does not collide with the atmosphere. Of course the solar wind collides with out air, for that's what brings solar heat to earth.

The sun undergoes explosions. How, then, can wave transfer through the solar wind be avoided? As the solar wind originates at the explosive processes of the sun, it's in contact with the sun. The energy of the explosions therefore must transfer through the wind aside from the flow aspect. The sun constantly expels free electrons, and that necessarily forms outward flow because gravity repels electrons. That's another thing the goofs refuse to acknowledge. The solar wind forms because solar gravity repels electrons. It repels electrons because gravity is sourced in the sun's (and planets') interior electrons. Solar plasma is a mix of free electrons and atoms. There cannot be plasma without the electrons, which are the heat of the plasma.

There can be no doubt that modern science has acknowledges true waves through the solar wind, but this is a guarded secret because the goofs don't want people to realize that these true waves are sunlight, pure and simple. The goofs don't want people to realize that the solar wind in the light-wave medium, the aether that the old caloricists viewed as a cosmic reality. The goofs were wrong is denying the aether, plain and simple, but the worst of it is that they are hiding it from you even though they now know that it exists. Why can't the solar wind be the aether? It can be, and it is.

The energy of the suns explosions reach our eyes, and it hurts them even after traversing millions of miles. The energy entering the eyes registers as light. The solar-wind flow does not reach our eyes because the air blocks it, slows it down, and because earth gravity repels it away from the ground.

Contrary to goofball science, light from the sun brings no heat to earth. The light wave is not a flow of electrons, and therefore can bring no heat to earth. Only the flow can. Heat build-up occurs only with a higher NUMBER of electrons, per unit space. The reason that objects get hotter in the sun is that the solar wave is pushing electrons into their atomic spaces. But these electrons are in the air already as the air's heat. The light wave adds no extra electrons to the air, but only pushes them into objects. The electrons then push their way out of the objects, back into the air, because they repel each other, explaining why objects cool when sunlight is denied them. True science, at your service.

Stick with me for true science, because I stumbled upon it many years ago, and have refined the science to a fair degree. One cannot understand the atomic world unless one first understands that gravity repels electrons. Take this goofball claim below, from an article that speaks on waves through the solar wind:

Since the 1950s, scientists have known that the Sun emits a stream of particles in a vast wind, carrying away an Earth’s worth of mass every 150 years. This wind of protons sweeps by comets and sculpts their tails into million-kilometer wind socks.

The goof ignores the electrons in the solar wind, and breaks the laws of science when claiming that bare protons exist in that wind. It's impossible for bare protons to exist in the wind with free electrons, for protons attract electrons. I explained that the only way for the sun to emit free electrons is for the sun to somehow destroy, or partially destroy, the positive force of protons. Therefore, at best, crippled protons are flowing in the solar wind that cannot attract enough electrons to become "healthy" (normal) atoms.

The quote about credits the solar wind for eroding ice off of comets, and sending the ice particles, and even some eroded rock debris, into the tail. It's a dingaling claim if ever you heard one. Has it never occurred to you that ice balls do not exist in space, and that they were invented only because the goofs refused to view solar gravity as a negative charge? The comet becomes a huge fireball many-many times larger than the comet itself. Anyone claiming that this fireball is from melting ice is a pure dingaling. It's laughable.

In reality, solar gravity repels electrons from the comet's rock atoms. These electrons then become heat INSIDE the comet, for the gravity's negative force repels electrons from interior atoms too, not just surface atoms. For negative charge can penetrate rock. The closer the comet comes to the sun, the more fiercely the sun strips comet atoms of their captured electrons. Once they worm their way through the rock, they enter space, and get repelled away from the sun, forming the tail of eroded surface particles (rock "dust").

That is, as they spray out of the rock, the electrons erode the rock, forcing small bits out into space with them. As these bits get pushed tailward by the electron flow, their atoms continue to release electrons, and as emitted electrons always produce light, that's why the tail emits light.

To convince you that bare protons exist in the solar wind, they say such things as the article above says: "Near Earth’s orbit, the solar wind fills a sugar cube’s worth of volume with five to 10 particles traveling outwards from the Sun at speeds between 559,000 and 1.57 million mph (250 and 700 kilometers per second)." They are obviously trying to make the protons as distant as possible from the wind's free electrons. They are claiming invention for fact, which is what leftists do as a rule, because they are lunatics on behalf of their big-bang atheism.
https://www.astronomy.com/science/somethings-heating-the-solar-wind-and-scientists-think-theyve-found-what-it-is/

But even though they have so few particles per a sugar-cube's worth of space volume, when passing by earth, they can't deny that the same volume at the sun's immediate atmosphere, or at its surface, has a far-greater density, for particles get less dense continuously when spreading (travelling) outward from a sphere shape (the sun's shape). How possibly could those protons not load with the free electrons in their midst. And why hasn't this writer mentioned those electrons? Instead, he says "protons" and "particles." The electrons constitute the aether, and solar waves through that aether are in reality sunlight. No photons necessary, not photons possible. They were invented because Einsteinian science denied the aether.

The article continues: "The laws of physics dictate that as the wind departs the Sun, expanding outward, it ought to slow down and cool off. But observations indicate that the wind doesn’t cool off as much as it should." In the minds of the goofballs, the electrons in the wind are not the reason for heat. Instead, they view heat as the speed of the particles. They assume that, when solar wind particles slow down, they should register as cooler temperature.

Fortunately, I can rescue them from their madness. Unfortunately, they won't listen to me. Just as gravity accelerates atoms toward earth, so gravity accelerates electrons away from earth. Therefore, solar-wind electrons are moving ever-faster as they travel from the sun's gravity.

Plus, the goofs seem too stupid to realize that the inter-repulsion forces of the electrons will accelerate them aside from gravity force doing the same. An object in motion in pure space (no friction from atoms getting in their way) will accelerate as long as energy exists in their midst to cause the forward motion. The forward speed at Time A will get faster later, at Time B, because the inter-repulsion energy of the electrons is always in their midst, always propelling them forward. It's like driving a car with the gas pedal down but without friction on the car and tires: it's going to accelerate continuously.

As the sun's gravity force reaches earth, it's a no-brainer that the sun's gravity force acts to accelerate solar-wind electrons.

And why do the goofs propose that the solar wind should be slowing with distance from the sun? I suppose it's because their solar-gravity theory attracts both protons and electrons. Ya-but, if the sun slows the particles, they should all fall back into the sun eventually. And that's partially why they claim that the earth';s magnetic field diverts the solar wind around the planet rather than causing the wind to strike the planet's atmosphere, for if the solar wind crashes into earth, then the goofs have no choice but to claim that those particular particles should fall back to the sun from the pull of solar gravity.

The only way their theory allows a solar wind that ever flows away from the sun is by their claim that its particles have achieved "escape velocity." But if the particles strike planets and moons, that velocity is canceled, and so there should be a steady stream of solar wind particles flowing back to the sun from every planet. As this backward wind does not exist, it should be plain to the goofs that the solar particles move away from the sun from some other mechanism beside escape velocity. And that mechanism is, pure and simple, constant negative force acting on the electrons.

That's why there cannot be bare protons in the solar wind, because it has not achieved escape velocity, meaning that bare protons could not escape the sun...unless their positive charge is ruined, for in that condition they are no longer attracted by solar gravity, because solar gravity is a negative charge.

The reason they lie about the existence of protons in the solar wind is because they invented a hydrogen atom as consisting of one proton per one electron. As NASA discovered free electrons in the solar wind by experimental fact, they concluded, from theory, not experimental fact, that the solar wind must have half electrons and half protons. They routinely speak facts from their theories without telling you the facts are based on theories (that they wrongly view as facts).

Something good has inadvertently come from the conundrum of the goofs, where they find more heat in the solar wind than there should be, a mystery according to their false theory that the solar wind should be slowing with time and distance from the sun. The article goes on: "The key ingredient [to solving the mystery] is waves that ripple outward through the solar wind, and the energy they transport and release." I'm not sure what is meant by that statement, but it sounds as though their conundrum has gotten them to admit that there are true waves transferring through the solar wind. But of course. It's an undeniable fact. The sun is exploding with power, and that power must go through the solar wind as true waves. BUT OF COURSE.

In that case, why can't those waves be light waves?

Here's how stupid they are while pretending to be so smart. They know that a half-inch of glass has more atoms than a certain thickness of steel or plastic or any other opaque material. They can readily see that light does not penetrate much thickness of opaque materials. They therefore must be able to understand that photons get blocked by atoms. They therefore have every reason to claim that they have intelligence enough to know that photons cannot get through ma half inch of glass without colliding constantly with glass atoms/protons.

What do you think? Is it a gamble only as to whether they are smart enough to reject photons as the mechanism of sunlight? Clearly, if photons, due to constant collisions with glass atoms/protons, are bouncing around randomly / chaotically, in all directions, inside the glass, then they will come out of the glass travelling in all directions. But unless the light reflecting off the birdhouse, on the other side of the glass from you, comes STRAIGHT through they glass, and STRAIGHT to your eyes, you cannot see the birdhouse. If the photons from the bird house are bouncing in all directions once they get out of the glass, almost none of them will come to your eyes. Therefore, the goofs are either too stupid to reject the photon, or to big-bang evil to do so.

The only alternative to photon light is the light wave. And so what's their problem if they now know that a solar-wind aether exists between the sun and earth? And if that aether is the means by which light propagates, then that aether must be in the earth atmosphere too. yes, but that aether is not the protons of the solar wind, but the electrons only, for the only way for light top propagate through a half inch of glass, or several feet of water, is by propagating through the electrons of the atoms.

It's clear as glass: light waves travel through the captured electrons of glass atoms, even of air atoms, and they travel circular around all protons so as to avoid collision with the protons. There is no way for light waves to propagate straight through glass unless they avoid the protons. I can tell you how they avoid protons.

The deeper electrons captured by protons, those nearest the proton's surface, are held more tightly, more rigidly. The electrons held at the outer peripheries of atoms are barely held on. They can be moved easily when a light wave enters the atoms, but the deeper electrons are not easily moved. Therefore, when a light wave enters the atom, pushing the outer electrons into any direction, they electrons naturally train in a circular direction around the proton because they take (train) the path of least resistance. It's easier for their motion when as far from the proton as possible, and so they keep to the peripheries of atoms.

The light waves, that is, keep to the peripheries of atoms, which is what causes the curved path around the proton. Once a wave exits the atom on the opposite side from which it enters, it transfers to the next atom, repeating the circular path...until it exits the glass and continues on its merry way through the aether in the air.

Light waves are impeded by rigidly-held electrons, just was water waves are impeded in ice. Anything resisting forward motion resists a light wave. The captured electrons of opaque materials must therefore cancel light waves (soon enough with depth) by being too rigidly held to protons to allow wave transfer.

The goofs invented "electromagnetic" light waves. What a bunch of clowns. That's their word to explain the photon-wave duality, an impossibility. They purely IMAGINE a particle travelling as a wave, what a bunch of lunatics. Throw the bums out.

The article goes on to point out the obvious, though a little too strenuously. The only thing that needs to be said is that the commotion in the sun, any commotion, will start a wave through the solar wind...as long as the atoms in the commotion are moving faster into the solar wind than the solar wind is moving away from the commotion.

If the commotion moves slower into the solar wind than the wind is moving toward the earth, no light will move toward earth, which is what happens in sunspots, when solar material is falling back toward the sun. The electrons emitting from that falling material emit too slowly toward earth to cause waves toward earth, like when you toss a stone 30 mph backward from a pick-up truck as it moves 40 miles per hour forward. The rock cannot strike the air in the backward direction, and cannot therefore form a wave through the air in that direction.

Alas, the article speaks on Alfven waves through the solar wind, like so: "This allowed scientists to observe the arrival of Alfven waves at the Parker Probe and then observe those same waves as they passed by Solar Orbiter, 45 hours later." Clearly, that's not light waves. These Alfven waves are thus not true waves, but simply a faster flow of solar wind than normal. These "waves" are more-explosive bursts of solar-wind material, in other words, with more density and more speed. It should be called a "current," not a wave. Or better yet, it's a gust, faster than normal wind.

Therefore, we want to know where the goofballs talk about the true waves through the solar wind. If they don't talk about them, that's partly why they're goofs. The solar-wind gusts will produce harder light waves, obviously, and nobody will dispute it. Gust have more density of explosive material, and thus more light waves as well as more-energetic light waves. High-energy waves are called "high frequency" by the goofballs, and low-energy waves are called low-frequency light.

I don't know how their lunatic minds can wrap themselves around the lunatic idea that low-frequency "waves" are somehow WIDER than high-frequency waves. There's no such thing as a wide light wave. A light wave moves 99.9-percent longitudinally. It has no width. It's as wide as one electron because one emitted electron causes one wave straight ahead. It's going to spread out (sideways) a tiny bit, but there's no such thing as a wave with definite width. The wave spreads out continuously more with distance from the source, same as a sound wave, except that light spreads much-much less. Ask the shade behind a tree trunk about that, where you can hear sounds from it's sunlit side due to sound curving around the trunk. Light waves don't curve around the trunk because they travel straight forward, longitudinally. DUH. It's a fool's game to assume that the straight path of light necessitates its being a photon particle.

There needs to be a reason that light waves "travel" (transfer) straight ahead in space, and the culprit must be the free electrons through which waves travel. As I currently see it, aether electrons providing visible light move super FAST, so fast that they don't spend enough time beside a neighboring electron to move it sideways.

At whatever speed electrons emit from the filament of a light bulb, the electrons between the filament and your eyes must move just about as fast because those free electrons are not held down to anything. Gravity is not holding them down as a grid upon the earth, as gravity holds air atoms down. There's nothing much to restrict motion as the wave goes free electron to free electron. Even when light curves around the outer edges of air atoms, those captured electrons are barely held to the protons, and thus offer little resistance to light-wave motion.

It's a fact that the outer layer of an atom is barely held to the proton because the outer layer is defined as electrons held toward protons by as much positive force as all captured electrons combined are repelling the outer layer outward. The outer layer is therefore in limbo.

Due to electrons repelling each other, they station themselves at equal distances from one another. This situation is the "default" situation, we could say; all electrons are "locked" into their default position. When a light wave come through and bumps one electron forward, it almost-instantly falls back to its default position. Imagine a second electron to its front a little, but also to its right side. The bumped electron bumps forward so fast, and is forced back to default position so fast, that it spends too little time beside the second one to move it sideways. The only motion taking place is to an electron to the direct front of the bumped electron.

The specific level of electromagnetic force acting from particle to particle depends on the amount of time spent in proximity to each other. If you slide a powerful magnet FAST past a ball bearing on your table, the ball bearing won't move because there hasn't been much time spend in proximity to each other. But if you slide the magnet slow, the ball bearing will roll. Therefore, I assume that light-wave bumping of free electrons is done too fast to cause much sideways "roll" of other electrons.

Light waves should not be viewed with width.

There is a question on whether the atomic commotion in the sun, versus the free-electron commotion, contributes to the formation of solar light waves. Known things on earth teach us, unless we are blinded by goofball theories, that electrons in motion cause light waves. But we don't notice that atomic motion causes light. When two objects collide at high speeds, light might form, but that's more likely from captured electrons ejected from the atoms at the collision point.

However, the forces from the atomic commotion in the sun are so unimaginably strong that they could possibly add some wave feature to the light waves caused by free-electron commotion.

It's known that a stream of electrons in a cathode-ray tube cause light to emit from the target of the electrons. Therefore, it should dawn on the goofs that solar waves through the electrons in the air can cause reflected light to shine from whatever the waves land on. No photons needed, just free electrons striking atomic electrons. It means that light is not an electromagnetic force in spite of electrons being electromagnetic particles. It means that reflected light is purely the PHYSICAL force of impacting aether electrons upon physically-reacting atomic electrons. The wave ends at the last electron in the wave, which is the aether electron immediately beside the atom upon which the wave lands. The solar light wave adds no heat to the earth. It only pushes aether electrons into materials.

It is not the electromagnetic force of the electron that causes light. However, the repulsion force is needed to create the lightwave, because aether electrons are in "contact" by their repulsion forces, and thus the physical force of an emitting electron can transfer as a wave though many aether electrons, which it could not if electrons were not in contact with each other.

Therefore, when sunlight heats the air in a garden greenhouse, electrons must be physically moving through the greenhouse's glass/plastic. The wave itself, landing on the floor of the greenhouse, brings no new electrons into the floor aside from electrons that were already in the greenhouse. The air in the greenhouse does NOT, therefore, heat up from the warmed floor. Whatever heat enters the floor will come out again with no temperature rise in the greenhouse.

This is a new realization for me this week. As the greenhouse air does rise in temperature, and as temperature rise is defined as a higher density of free electrons in the air, it stands to be yet discovered that heat enters the green house because light waves physically push electrons through the glass. And indeed this is logical.

When one electron enters the glass from the outside, it pushes captured electrons clear through the glass until one electron flushes out of the glass, into the greenhouse air/aether. Therefore, that one electron landing on the outer glass causes one electron, or perhaps less than one electron, to enter the greenhouse air. That is, for every 100 electrons landing on the outer glass, less than 100 may enter the air (I have no idea as to the real number).

Someone else writes: "Despite the widespread recognition of the importance of the solar wind, there is still no clear agreement on precisely where on the Sun it comes from or how it is ACCELERATED to such dramatic speeds." Try as they might to explain why the solar wind accelerates, it's as though the stupids are doped up on dope, unable to see that solar gravity is an electromagnetic force from the negative charge of free electrons.

Apparently, not all goofs equate the speed of the solar wind with it's temperature. The article having the quote above says: "...scientists noticed that the solar wind had both fast and slow components. The fast wind was found to be COOL and THIN and swift, moving along at up to 800 kilometers per second, nearly twice the speed of the HOT, DENSE SLOW wind." This squares with the reality they refuse to acknowledge, that dense electrons are defined as hotter regions than less-dense electrons.

The only way more-dense electrons can move slower is if obstructed by atoms in their midst. As more-dense electrons are closer to each other, they repel each other harder, and are therefore predicted to move faster into space, unless obstructed by atoms in their midst. Heat rises slowly on earth because air atoms obstruct the upper pathways of the air's free electrons. It's better to say that there's a body of air atoms in the earthly aether than to say a sea of electrons in the air, for the aether is larger (goes higher).

A thinner solar wind can be faster (toward earth) than predicted by its density only if it spews/explodes outward faster. The thinner the wind, the less propulsion it has under its own inter-repulsion forces. These realities are clues as to what's going on in the sun. The best way to help the goofs is to let them know they are goofs. If you offer them respect and praise, they will continue in their errors.

As the goofs see that the exploded materials in the sun fall back down to the sun, where do they get their lunatic idea that normal protons have achieved escape velocity? Aren't exploded materials shot out the fastest of all? Yes. Yet the atoms of exploded materials do not fly off into space, so far as can be seen in telescopic videos.

What they don't know is that a bare proton is far heavier than a clothed atom. Solar gravity pulls down atoms when clothed with many captured electrons, but a bare proton is far more positively charged than a clothed atom, and as such solar gravity will pull a bare proton many times harder, for solar gravity is a negative charge. The pull of gravity is defined as weight. The weight of an atom goes up as it looses electrons. The weight of an atom goes up as it looses mass, but the goofs are not trained to think in this way.

I doubt that the sun is a magnet, wherefore magnetic field lines on the sun is an invention by which the quacks seek to solve the mysteries birthed by their errors. The article above thinks that the magnetic field of the sun causes the slow solar wind, as if the solar-wind electrons are slowed by the negative force of the solar magnet, or that the speed of solar-wind protons are slowed by the positive force of the solar magnet. No, stupids, the whole sun is negatively charged, and that charge blows some captured electrons from all solar atoms, making them net-positive such that gravity arranges to attract all solar atoms. Solar hydrogen atoms (they have countless electrons) are very heavy due to the huge negative charge in the sun. Anyone believing that an H atom has one electron only is a science cripple, or a maniac who butchers science. Throw the bums out.

The article says that the "magnetic fields near the Sun do indeed control and shape the flow of the solar wind." Men without legs, hacking each others legs off. Hydrogen atoms on the sun are positively charged, and free electrons are negatively charged. If the sun had a north pole, it would either attract free electrons or hydrogen atoms, but not both, and vice-versa for the sun's south pole. The solar-magnet idea is the idea of a hack.

google AI: "Yes, the Sun has a magnetic North and a magnetic South pole, similar to Earth, and these poles regularly flip every 11 years as part of the solar cycle." Clearly, the 11-year cycle is due to something other than magnetic poles, for the latter cannot exist. It's even known that magnets are destroyed in heat, wherefore what possibly could be in the sun's interior to form a huge magnet? MORONS.

The writer says that fast solar winds emit from "coronal holes," defined as cooler regions. CRIPPLED MORONS. These "holes," which are not holes at all, are not cooler. The goofs assume them to be cooler because they are darker, but darker areas on the sun are those having splashed materials, splashed from HOT explosions, moving back downward toward the sun. These hotter regions account for the thinner and faster solar-wind electrons because, the harder the explosion, the thinner and faster the spray. The harder the explosion from a pipe bomb having 100 ball bearings, the more distance it will put between ball bearings.

If the morons had simply received the obvious understanding that light waves are true waves through the solar wind, they would have realized decades ago that sunspots and coronal holes are from downward-moving materials.

Just so you know:

No, coronal holes are not "holes" in the Sun in the sense of a physical absence of material. Instead, they are regions in the Sun's outer atmosphere, the corona, where the magnetic field lines are open and allow plasma to escape into space at high speeds, creating streams of solar wind. These regions appear dark in extreme ultraviolet (EUV) and soft X-ray images because they are cooler and less dense than the surrounding solar plasma (google AI).

It is a hole in the atmosphere in the sense that there's downward-moving material after the outward explosion. The holes are not proven cooler than the surrounding plasma just because they offer lower-intensity light. The reality is the same as when a star moving away from earth offers lower-intensity light as compared to the same star moving toward earth. If a star moves away from earth faster than that star's electrons emit toward earth, that star will look black from the earth, but will not look black from other directions.

Cosmologists misinterpret black-hole stars as having gravity so strong as to not allow light's escape, a theory of morons. In reality, black holes can be weak stars moving away from earth faster-than-normal, and emitting slow electrons toward earth. Or, maybe the astronomers are just wrong about the existence of shine-less stars supposedly detected by some means (I don't see how).

The Aether Makes Fools

Gravity does not attract light. Whatever "genius" invented that idea was a crippled moron without an aether. Einstein was toying with electrons under his nose, but failed to realize that they are the aether he rejected. The sun was making a fool of him. He was shining light on metals, watching electrons pop out, but didn't want to see that light was itself from electron waves through the aether that he was breathing in through his own nose. Rule number one, Einstein: if light moves through the air, there's a light-wave medium in the air. Trust, and seek.

Albert Einstein rejected the idea of the "luminiferous aether" primarily because his special theory of relativity, formulated in 1905, provided a framework that did not require its existence and explained observed phenomena more elegantly and consistently.

Ya-but a dog and its dish don't require the existence of the aether either; it doesn't mean the aether doesn't exist. The quote continues: "The aether was a hypothetical medium thought to permeate space and carry light waves, but experiments like the Michelson-Morley experiment provided no evidence for its existence or for a preferred 'absolute rest' frame." Ya-but, did anyone think of checking for an aether originating in the sun? If they disproved an aether that is not the real aether, then they didn't disprove the existence of the aether. google AI continues:

Lack of Empirical Evidence: Despite numerous attempts to detect the aether's effects, particularly through experiments like the Michelson-Morley experiment, no conclusive evidence for its existence was ever found. In fact, the null results of these experiments were a crucial impetus for the development of special relativity.

Ya-but, solar-wind electrons were discovered in the 1950s, and proposed even earlier. Plus, it's an accepted fact that electrons do exist in our air right now. Why can't they be the aether? Has anyone proven that free electrons can't be the light-wave medium? Not that I've heard of. I figure the goons don't even want to bring that idea up for debate, lest people see the validity.

For a good laugh, we find that Michelson-Morley conducted their experiment in the atmosphere. They assumed that the cosmic aether was the same in the air as it is in space, and assumed it was stationary, not moving with the earth. What do you suppose would be the result if they looked for that stationary aether in the atmosphere, where both it and the atmosphere move with the earth's spin? They assumed that they were moving through the aether along with the earth's motion. Instead, the aether is stationary on the earth, relatively speaking, same as that cup on your table is stationary relative to you (even though it's moving with the earth).

Atmospheric electrons do not move across the air, but essentially move WITH the air when wind blows, or essentially rest with the air when there's no wind. The air does not, as they believed, move through the aether as the earth spins or orbits. They assumed wrong, and thus they proved that their erroneous aether does not exist, not at all meaning that free electrons in the air do not define the aether.

Their experiment measured the speed of light in the direction of the earth orbit, and compared it to the speed of light perpendicular to the earth orbit, assuming that the aether is separate from the air such that the speed of light should be a little different in the direction of earth orbit versus perpendicular to it. HAHAHA.

In a science lab, the aether doesn't move. If you check whether light travels faster east versus north, in a lab, the aether is making a fool of you. The aether is not moving in a closed room, in any direction. It's as still as the air because it's a basic part of it.

Gravity repels aether particles upward in open air, but even then the aether moves very slowly, slower than the speed of rising smoke from a camp fire. That smoke rises due to much heat from the flames, but apart from a fire, heat -- the aether that is -- rises much slower. To say that there's no evidence of an aether is laughable because heat is the aether. "Caloric" and aether are one and the same. This idea is getting quite old now, but Einsteinian fools refuse to bow to it.

google AI is programmed to say: "The concept of a stationary luminiferous aether was disproven by the Michelson-Morley experiment, which failed to detect the expected 'aether wind' caused by the Earth's motion through a stationary medium." By "aether wind," it is not meant the solar wind, which was not yet discovered. It means the apparent wind due to earth's motion through it. It means that the existence of the aether was not disproven because the aether is not motionless in the cosmos, nor does the whole atmosphere move through the cosmic aether.

Instead, the leading edge of the atmosphere constantly collides with the aether as the latter passes from sun to earth-and-beyond.

The Michelson-Morley experiment, conducted in 1887, was designed to detect the motion of the Earth through a hypothetical medium called the luminiferous aether, which was believed to carry light waves, but the experiment yielded a "null result" indicating no "ether wind" and thus providing strong evidence against the existence of the luminiferous aether, ultimately paving the way for Einstein's theory of special relativity...

Ya-but, the aether they were looking for was thought to be such that the earth would sail into the wind for half the earth orbit, and half with the wind on the other orbital half. But with an aether sourced in the sun, the earth never changes how it collides with it, meaning that one cannot compare the earth collision with it in one month to some months later. There won't be any difference in any month, which is exactly what Michelson-Morley experiment discovered.

Let's continue to make fools of the goofballs, shall we? So much fun. I asked google, "why was caloric disproven?" The response from AI recordings:

The caloric theory, which proposed heat was a conserved fluid-like substance, was disproven due to experimental evidence, particularly from Count Rumford and James Prescott Joule, showing that heat could be continuously generated through mechanical work and that heat was a form of energy, not a substance.

Yes, heat can be generated by friction even though no heat was apparently added to the materials undergoing friction. But the fools were fooled because they didn't want to think hard enough to figure out how heat could be a substance. Clearly, if heat was coming out of materials constantly via friction, then atoms had to be made of heat. And, yes, atoms are indeed made of heat because its the caloric of electrons. Caloric was the theory prior to its discovery of the electron. but what's the excuse of physicists after the discovery?

Why didn't they announce that the electron is the caloric material? Did they assume that electrons could not be both the electrical material and heat material? Why not? No electricity is added to metals to produce perpetual electricity, and yet they believed that electricity existed via the electrons that were already in the metals. Ditto for heat: it's already in the materials undergoing friction. Scratch atoms, and the electrons come off as heat, duh.

Plus, scratch / rub materials, and they loose electrons only to reload with them once we stop scratching / rubbing. That's because the air is jammed packed with solar-wind electrons.

Electrons captured by protons are stored heat. They don't feel hot to the touch as long as protons have them captured, because, unless the electrons are entering the body, they are not technically heat. Only when freed from atoms do they unavoidable become heat. That's why the sun must be undergoing the destruction or crippling of protons, so that atoms can PERMANENTLY release all/some of their electrons.

It's probably true that crippled protons get flushed out of the sun and into the solar wind, but I'm of the opinion that astronomy has detected them because it lies, saying that there's as many protons in the solar wind as electrons, which is impossible. They are thus fiendishly inventing a fact as demanded by their false view of the hydrogen atom. google AI routinely states "facts" based solely on the predictions / expectations of false science. It is a most-disgusting situation foisted upon humanity, with undeserved pride. They speak so well of boneheaded scientific "achievements."

Want another laugh? James Joule stirred water and made it hotter. Hence, the fools decided that heat is due to the interaction of materials such that their atoms are sped up. Ya-but, first prove that atoms are in constant motion, which nobody can prove because it's not reality. Nobody should be permitted to invent the idea that hotter atoms are faster atoms unless one first proves that atoms are in motion. In reality, atoms are not in motion unless set into motion, but even if one takes a sledge hammer to a block of metal, the atoms will vibrate for a short time only, and then become stationary again. The laws of physics demands that atoms of solid substances cannot be continually vibrating from energy picked up ions ago at the big bang. That is STUPID DESPERATION of the evolutionists.

On Joule, note the pride in the language: "Through a series of INGENIUS experiments, most FAMOUSLY involving a paddle wheel apparatus stirring water, Joule quantified the precise amount of mechanical energy required to produce a given amount of heat, resulting in a value close to the specific heat of water." See this video to see Joule's paddle-wheel experiment prior to the discovery of the electron (in 1897).

The proud peacocks claim that work translates to heat, wherefore heat is the motion of atoms. But this paddle-wheel work is but a form of friction. The paddle wheel turns in water, and therefore removes some of the electrons from both the water molecules and the paddle's atoms. It's not as though scientists were incapable of coming to that conclusion, after electrons were discovered, and so what's the excuse of the establishment for not pointing it out, to this day, as a significant rebuttal to the kinetic theory of heat?

There is no excuse. It means that the establishment has become a den of self-interested fiends most interested in whatever favors / advances the theory of evolution. The establishment has become a self-deluded deluding machine. It routinely misinterprets experiments that favor the theories chosen by evolutionists. It's identical to when Democrat news stations advance the spins that best-favor Democrats. IDENTICAL. Evolutionists naturally fell in love with experiments that could be interpreted as evolution-friendly, or at least that could not discredit evolution.

As we can see stars, there must be aether between earth and all visible stars. For evolutionists who don't believe in God's hand in Creation, it means that stars emitted electrons that filled the vast space between them and earth, but this is problematic for evolutionists because stellar electrons travel much-much-much slower than their speed of light. It means that, in order to believe in an aether as the light medium, cosmologists would need to date star formation far-far-far older than they already have it. A Creationist would need to conclude that God made the aether separate from star formation.

An evolutionist brainwashed by modern cosmology will simply dismiss the aether due to this one problem that requires a new date for the big bang, much older than the "fact" date that has already been passed off on humanity. Rather than dealing with the headaches involved, the re-doing the big-bang "science," and looking like fools in the meantime, they'll prefer to simply dismiss the aether.

They choose to view gas atoms constantly in motion, and of course, without a God in their schemes, they see that motion originating from the big bang. They don't want gas atoms to repel one another because it's equivalent to the murder of star formation by the big bang. Therefore, they claim that gas atoms are neutral, or that they attract one another when it comes to explaining how gas atoms form liquids. Repulsion between gas atoms is absolutely out of the question for them, yet repulsion of gas atoms is the obvious reality. That's how the fools roll, evolution first, realities second.

They won't tell you that they have a big problem explaining sound waves with constantly-flying gas atoms. Unless air atoms are repelling one another, they cannot be in constant contact, and if they are not in constant contact, sound waves cannot go through air. It's that simple. But the goofs will insist that sound waves can move through atoms constantly flying about because they at times make contact. But this is a red herring. Sound waves can only move through air if air atoms repel each other.

Impossible Kinetic Atoms

The skunks who claim that hotter air rises due to buoyancy are lying to you, because the buoyancy principle that applies to balloons does not apply to single atoms, especially if atoms are constantly flying about in all directions, and banging heads together, like dizzy lunatics.

Air atoms are further apart with height above the ground. How does that happen? The only way for the establishment to explain it, by their kinetic theory of atoms, is that gravity is weaker with height. The problem is, air is eight times thinner about six miles above the ground, but the distance between the average gravity source and ground level makes six miles a drop in the bucket by comparison.

When air atoms are twice as far from gravity, they are pulled by four times less force. In that situation, we could possibly claim that air atoms would be twice as far apart. But for air atoms to be twice as far from gravity requires them some 2,000 miles above the ground, if we think the average gravity force is 2,000 miles beneath the ground. In other words, we can't expect air atoms to be eight times thinner about six miles up, because atoms eight times thinner are twice as far apart in all directions. It's not making sense.

The goofs need to view air atoms either as neutral, or in inter-attraction, though they can't have both. It makes for a huge problem because, unless air atoms repel each other, they cannot be in "contact." As the entire body of air is known to weighs down upon the ground, it means simply that the goofs have goofed bigtime, because air atoms cannot transfer their weights to the ground unless they repel each other.

If atoms spread out more with height, then they appear to be repelling harder with height, if more distance from gravity alone cannot explain how the atoms get so far apart so quickly with height. I can't see how atoms can repel harder with height, since temperatures drop with height, making atoms less repulsive. Therefore, how do higher atoms get so far apart?

Atoms do get literally lighter with height because less gravity allows them to load with more electrons. The more electrons atoms capture, the less net-negative they become, and thus the less gravity attracts them. Yet, on the other hand, less heat in the midst of higher air atoms makes them repel with less force, which has the effect of allowing atoms to come closer to each other. There's a question here as to whether there's more inter-repulsion force, versus less inter-repulsion force, per any given height, due to these two factors working simultaneously. The fact that the one counters the other to some degree means that we definitely need a third effect to explain how atoms are so far apart with such little height.

Problems are the bait to solutions. There needs to be a solution, and solutions in atomic physics often lead to ground-breaking discoveries that net solutions to other mysteries. The solution does make for a grand discovery: the goofs are goofballs. The solution is that the air atoms above six miles all collectively sit on the atoms at six miles of height. See the solution?

When I say that the air sits on the atoms at six miles of height, I mean that it weighs down on them. This weight will force atoms closer together than gravity alone can force them closer together. However, air atoms at ground level have an additional six miles weighing down on them, as compared to atoms six miles up, and so this explains why air atoms lower down are continuously closer together than atoms higher up.

Like I said, the goofs are goofballs because their view of the atmosphere doesn't allow air atoms to weigh down on air atoms, yet they will acknowledge that air atoms are further apart at any given height precisely due to the weight of air at any given height. We win, they lose, evolution of stars from the big bang is impossible with inter-repelling gas atoms...that inter-repel more fiercely with extreme-high temperatures.

Do birds in flight weigh down on each other? Does a flock of black birds in fight weigh down on the ground? Do flying birds weigh down on each other when colliding in all directions like lunatics? Do flying birds weigh down on the ground when colliding with each other? If no-no-no-no to all questions, then neither can flying and colliding atoms weigh upon each other, or onto the ground. WE WIN, THEY LOSE.

But there is an additional problem, because, when gravity repels aether electrons toward space, they give lift to air atoms, which has the effect of spreading them apart even more than the repulsion forces do from heat merely "stationed" in their midst. Heat is not literally stationed if its moving upward, but as heat from lower down replaces rising heat precisely because heat's outspreading quality forbids a heatless volume of space, we can view heat as being stationed around all air atoms continuously. Aside from the heat separating atoms by its repulsion force, rising heat acts to move atoms further apart.

As temperature differences (= differences in electron density) in the air cause wind, it's the aether that causes wind. Air atoms are pulled to the earth and tend to motionless, but the outspreading aether, seeking to equalize electron density everywhere such that its particles move about, moves air atoms in the process, as wind.

The problem is, there is less heat higher up, and thus less lift upon the undersides of air atoms, for which reason this aspect does not explain how atoms get further apart with height. As air atoms load with more electrons with height, they are expected to repel each other more weakly, and that too cannot explain how atoms get further apart with height.

If we view air atoms as net-positive, loading more electrons makes them less net-positive, and thus they are predicted to repel each other less. No good. But if we view air atoms as net-negative, loading more electrons makes them more net-negative, and thus they are expected to repel each other more, with height, which can possibly explain why they create more distance with height. However, the atomic loading of electrons is taking place while atoms lose aether electrons with height, for colder temperatures means that fewer aether electrons crush in upon atoms.

Still, there is hope that the literal loading of electrons increases atomic repulsion more than the "unloading" of aether electrons reduces their inter-repulsion. I like this theory. It's the only explanation I can see. In lower temperatures, atoms are not literally unloading electrons, but rather some aether electrons are simply disappearing, moving away, from their outer layers. It's possible that the invasion of one aether electron effects far less push-apart force than one loaded electron.

So, the loading of more electrons with height, in combination of lower gravity force with height, might perfectly explain why air atoms move twice as far apart in merely six miles of height.

r Without heat in the picture, gravity arranges all atoms to repel each other due to every atom becoming net-positive. Gravity repels some electrons off of ALL atoms. All electrons held to a proton more weakly than the force of gravity cannot remain on the atom, but will be blown away by gravity. Therefore, the outer layer of EVERY atom has electrons held to the proton by an iota of force greater than the force of gravity. Those outer electrons are basically in limbo, neither held to the proton but by an iota of force, nor repelled away from its capture. One can scratch them off atoms easily, even with a slow paddle in water.

Then, when we add solar heat to that picture, it means that free electrons in the air, the aether, crowd around all atoms and compress / crunch them, because electrons repel each other in all directions, and because the electron atmospheres of atoms are compressible. The electrons that are the outer layers of atoms are thus pushed by the aether toward the proton. It's now going to be very difficult to understand where the outer layer of the atom truly is, once heat-electrons crowd in on the atom. Is the true outer layer, the one in limbo, now a layer of aether electrons? Yes, I think so. On the other hand, if the proton can yet attract the outer layer, then we shouldn't call it a layer of aether electrons.

If you can follow the above, then you realize that the atom can grow in size with added heat i.e. in higher temperatures. Heat makes the atom bigger.

Invading aether electrons thus become part of the atomic sphere. I've consistently had a problem trying to understand the electromagnetic dynamics of this situation. On the one hand, I reason that invading aether electrons grant some negative charge to all atoms such that all gas atoms repel by becoming net-negative (thanks to heat in their midst). On the other hand, I have at least one reason to believe that atoms retain their net-positive charge, thanks to gravity, even when surrounded and crushed by negative, aether electrons.

To try to figure out which option is the reality, I note that gas atoms always repel each other more strongly with higher temperatures. That is, gases get higher gas pressure with more electrons crushing in on them, which could suggest that atoms are net-negative because, if they were net-positive to begin with, the addition of negative charge (from heat) would make them go neutral with sufficient addition of heat, and only after going neutral would atoms become net-negative with the addition of more heat. This is a very problematic view, the only solution being: atoms go neutral a couple/few degrees above absolute zero temperature, such that, in normal temperatures, all atoms are net-negative.

The second option is that all atoms in normal temperatures are net-positive, and that the addition of heat, while adding negative charge to them, does NOT make them go net-negative. I had opted to reject that theory because the addition of negativity to net-positive atoms will make them repel less with added heat. Yet gas atoms always repel harder with added heat, for gas pressure always increases with added heat.

The second option is that heat alone pushes atoms apart. That is, atomic push-apart (= material expansion) is not from atoms repelling each other harder with added heat, as would be the case if they all became net-negative at very low temperatures.

It's absolutely expected that inter-repelling electrons surrounding atoms will cause all materials to expand, and thus to increase in pressure if materials are in a confined space (i.e. in a container). Inter-repelling electrons surrounding atoms will definitely push atoms apart in gases, liquids and solids, regardless of whether atoms are net-negative or net-positive.

Every once in a while, I toy seriously with the idea that added heat makes atoms less repulsive to one another even though heat makes atoms push apart more forcefully. In the second option, there are three things happening with increased heat: 1) atoms are pushed apart by the existence of more heat; 2) atoms repel each other less; 3) gravity has less pull on atoms i.e. atoms become lighter. There I see a glaring problem: heating a gas locked in a container does not make it lighter in weight, and so I can't justify the second option above, where added heat decreases the net-positive force of atoms.

In order for the second option to be true, there has got to be some evidence that, with sufficient heat, atoms go neutral toward each other, at which point gravity no longer attracts atoms. One might argue that, perhaps, this situation defines so-called "plasma." But the fact yet remains that nobody has reported lighter gas atoms with added heat. In open air, hotter gases do rise, not because the atoms are made lighter with added heat, but because heat is repelled upward by gravity.

Grok, the data robot, says that evolution is a fool's game, but expect the evolutionists to re-program Grok such that it is no longer a Creationist:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ga7m14CAymo

I'm wondering whether Grok was deliberately programmed, temporarily, to be a Creationist, and a believer in God, to lure Christians / Muslims / etc. to use Grok for making global profit$. Later, it can better brainwash these groups into anti-Christian logic and lifestyles. satan's slippery slope.

NEWS

This video with John Ratcliffe, from week's end, needs to go first, as it's the best one I've seen all week:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MlcTfS3xYE

This week, Tulsi Gabbard of Trump's National Intelligence released 26 more pages of evidence, mainly from data at John Ratcliffe's CIA, in efforts to prove that Obama and his Intelligence chiefs, led by a skeptical James Clapper, are criminally guilty of conspiring to usurp Trump's election win in 2016.

This story is what the Trump base has been long waiting for, and so it better not be a dud if ever the lit match even gets to the fuse. Ms. Gabbard is hopefully sincere in urging and expecting Kash Patel to arrest Obama and/or his Intelligence chiefs. Pro-Trumpers are skeptical for good reasons. This process can be to slowed that it'll be left hanging at the 2026 elections, with much political hype and no intent to follow through on prosecutions. Par for the course, and I have no confidence in Trump whatsoever.

When he said that Bondi should release whatever is "credible" on Epstein, she probably feels compelled to run any potential releases past him, before release, so that Trump ultimately becomes the governor of what's released, what's not. That's dishonest. But some are now interpreting Trump's 180-degree attitude toward Epstein exposure as his attempt to subtly pre-inform his base that someone in the Obama / Biden camp created fictitious Epstein material deliberately to frame the president with Epstein-related crimes.

In other words, Trump has been preparing his fight against a new, invented scandal prepared apparently by the New York FBI, which is where James Comey's daughter (lawyer) worked on the Epstein files, and where those files were created whether all true or partially true. This daughter was part of the lead pack against Epstein, and maybe we now know why. The question then becomes: if the Obama / Comey circle created a false Trump-Epstein story, why didn't they release it when Biden was in the White House? Or, if the person(s) in charge of the news release thought the story would not damage Trump, but would probably backfire, why is Trump so afraid of the story now?

The threat now: Trump might now weaponize his Justice department to make the "inventors" of the story look guilty when in reality the story is true, not invented. But first, we need to see what exactly the Trump-Epstein story is.

According to the Wall Street Journal, the DoJ (Bondi and/or Blanche) told Trump that his name was multiple times in the FBI truckload of Epstein files delivered to Kash Patel. I wouldn't give this story any credibility yet, except that, when Bondi, Patel and Blanch were asked about it, they deflected, failing to flatly say the story is untrue (none want to go down as liars in efforts to save Trump from this story):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaQkjuGIrb8

I think the story is true, perfectly explaining why Trump said (a week or two ago) that things in the Epstein files were invented by the Democrat government. It appears he is planning to deny whatever the Epstein files say that speak on a Trump-Epstein alliance / friendship. The passion by which Democrats are pushing the Epstein hype, but only to damage Trump, could explain why Trump's DNI chief is going after Obama as if she wants him arrested.

Some are saying that Obama can't be arrested because he has absolute immunity now, for crimes committed while in the White House. If he's brought before congress for questioning, he would be under certain pressure to lie, which could get him arrested, since the immunity doesn't extend to his life outside the White House. Yet, that's why he'll probably plead the 5th, which is tantamount to an admission of guilty without stating the particular guilt or degree of guilt. Still, we would all like to see Obama plead the 5th. The congress had best not fail here.

There is another explanation, that Trump sincerely wants to expose the Russia-collusion gang, but doesn't want Epstein news taking up news time while he glories in the Russia-collusion stories. Or, both options could be true, the other being that Democrats invented an Epstein crime in which he's involved. With the DoJ and FBI in Trump's hands, he and they together could prove, perhaps easily and with finality, such an invention to be an invention. That's what he needs to keep the House of 2026, proof that he's not been criminally involved with Epstein.

This week, good news: "A House Oversight subcommittee voted Wednesday to subpoena the Department of Justice to release the Jeffrey Epstein files. The motion passed by a vote of 8-2. Notably, three GOP lawmakers -- Reps. Nancy Mace, Scott Perry and Brian Jack -- joined with Democrats on the subcommittee to approve the subpoena, defying Republican leadership" (ABC). What's wrong with the Republican leadership that it would deny justice on Epstein-circle crimes?

I don't know what exactly this bill is aimed at revealing, nor do I know whether it's publicization is included versus becoming privy to the Subcommittee only. This vote is for a subpoena only, seeking to force the Justice department of Pam Bondi to release files. She could refuse, but that will not bode well for her political career, and will knock Trump back into the political trash bin, I think, just when he's trying to pretend that he's doing all he can to release the "credible" files.

Bondi needs no congressional permission / impetus to question anybody at all. She needs to question Susan Rice now, because:

As part of their continued efforts to conduct oversight of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Department of Justice (DOJ)...the Senate Judiciary’s Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism...discovered a partially unclassified email sent by President Obama’s former National Security Advisor (NSA) Susan Rice to herself on January 20, 2017 – President Trump’s inauguration day.

Ambassador Rice appears to have used this email to document a January 5, 2017 Oval Office meeting between President Obama, former FBI Director James Comey and former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates regarding Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential election. In particular,...

https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/grassley-graham-uncover-unusual-email-sent-susan-rice-herself-president-trump-s

Rice sent herself an invented email to create a record tidbit of the January 5 meeting, but merely to whitewash the event. She must have been instructed to do so, exposing that plotters probably routinely provide for themselves official records showing false innocence. Tulsi Gabbard claims that, the very next day, Obama sicked his Democrat machine on Trump, including Comey, McCabe (ardent Hillary supporter), and Clapper.

There is yet a House-wide effort to unveil the Epstein files, led by Thomas Massie. That too may pass. The committee above also passed, this week, a motion to subpoena the Clintons and others on the matter of Epstein, meaning that the tide of Democrat media harping on the Epstein files caused this congressional motion to get enough Democrat votes to pass:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SsEfOtiZAQQ

Trump could be trying to get Ghislaine Maxwell out of jail, or to shorten her sentence. It seems to me that whatever Ghislaine says to the DoJ, to incriminate anyone involved with Epstein in return for some DoJ favor, will only reflect badly on her, for she was either Epstein's boss, or Epstein's deputy, or both.

For those who say that the Biden administration would certainly have released any damning data on Trump, if it existed in things-Epstein, I think we should consider that the defacto leaders behind Biden could have decided prudently to withhold that data to blackmail Trump, to keep him from prosecuting high-level Democrats going back to Obama's presidency.

Update on the Massie bill:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K32ntuFYcC4

In the first four minutes of the video below, you will see enough evidence that Bondi's DoJ is sabotaging its judicial application to publicize the Epstein court transcripts. Whoever wrote this application (signed by Todd Blanche) is bringing Trump's pathetic attitude to the court that holds the power to keep the transcripts sealed or unsealed. Whoever wrote this is asking the judge: please don't publicize:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57N65-JY6_g&t=24s

The importance of the transcripts is to show how soft the DoJ went on Epstein, meaning that there's not likely any deeply-vilifying facts. Trump probably chose to call for the publication of these transcripts because they reveal very little on Epstein's sins. This is a red herring from Trump. This is Trump the hypocrite.

The video below has a clip near the start showing how Speaker Johnson is bitter toward Thomas Massie, which seems not to bode well for Trump, or for the Republicans keeping the House. Johnson acts like he wants Epstein crimes exposed, but is apparently trying to be a thorn in the side of Massie's anti-Epstein bill. Massie is helping to show the opacity (opposite of transparent) of the mask-wearing RINOs when it comes to high-level crimes. It's disgusting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-slxtwu5Zc

The good news is that, the more the Trump administration bites at Obama and company, the more the Democrats want Epstein transparency in hopes of biting Trump back.

As it seems that Trump is for the calling Ghislaine Maxwell to congress for her testimony, some are toying with the theory that Trump is willing to pardon her in return for her claims that he was never known by her to be with under-aged ladies. This deal would be wrong. This would be Trump doing the opposite of forcing justice on the Epstein cabal.

The video below shows why John Ratcliffe is likely highly involved, right now, in exposing Obama's and Clinton's Russia-collusion hoax:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QcpCBGWImKY

In the video above, John Solomon is for a grand-jury prosecution of the Obama cabal, but I heard days ago that grand-jury proceedings are kept perpetually hidden from the public, giving me the impression that grand-jury proceedings were invented by government / political gangsters who pull strings liberally during the proceedings. It would be far better to have standard prosecutions fully open to the public, but where the prosecution team has heart for rectifying the damage, not merely doing their duty with robotic indifference. Typical criminals in government must be made ashamed, and must have their faces brought to the dust, on top of being jailed. Otherwise, criminality in government becomes normal.

In the video below, shortly after the 3:00 point, a journalist tells that Trump's FBI plied and threatened him slightly, in the middle of the night, because he was gung-ho in opposition against the DoJ's infamous memo of not long ago, stating that the DoJ can find no crimes in the Epstein ring:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mMFi-5RDXc

This week, Dan Bongino publicized a message to the country, which included, "we're going to get the ANSWERS we all deserve." Why not just tell the country you're a traitor to your own sentiments? What the country wants to hears is, "we're going to get the ARRESTS we all deserve." It's a million miles from "answers" to "arrests." Could you, like, move on it?

The best news of all is that all the leftist news stations are now forced to bury themselves even more in skunker juice because they will continue to claim that Trump colluded treasonously with Putin. Sooner or later, even the biggest fools in the leftist-news audience will need to openly admit that leftist news is contrived, staged. These fools appreciate the stagings and the lies because it's politically expedient and helpful, which is why they are demonic fools.

---

NEXT UPDATE

Here's all four Gospels wrapped into one story.

For Some Prophetic Proof for Jesus as the Predicted Son of God.
Also, you might like this related video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3EjmxJYHvM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efl7EpwmYUs

Pre-Tribulation Preparation for a Post-Tribulation Rapture

---