I added some material to the last update Monday, and more on Tuesday of this week, including this: "As Morley did nothing but ride a circle around the sleeping bag, only to ride down the road from whence he came, perhaps the sleeping bag represents a crime scene inspected by the FBI. KASH Patel is the FBI director,...How does a sleeping bag represent a crime scene? The Bag Chief has the cinquefoils of Gangs (Norfolk with Bags) in colors reversed, a possible pointer to government gangsters. I hope."

You can load Bags now, which load on another tab, in order to load other surnames, to better follow the heraldic links.

That was the first I'd ever proposed that the sleeping bag could depict a crime scene. Later in the update: "Years [the surname] are first known in Stirlingshire while Stirlings have a "gang" motto term!!! There must have been secret gangsters in the sleeping bag who need to be shaken out." Later yet in the update: "Jeffrey Epstein's fellow criminals have got to be in that sleeping bag." That update was Internet uploaded Monday at noon.

Then, on Wednesday, the very day after I wrote the quotes above, news came out like so: "FBI Director Kash Patel discovered 'burn bags' filled with thousands of documents dating back to the bureau's Trump-Russia probe..." By "burn bag" is meant that these government documents were slated to be destroyed. The FBI arranged to routinely destroy documents under the convenient excuse of playing safer with data, but this allowed the FBI bosses to burn self-incriminating data without raising red flags.

What I said above is true, the quotes were added either Monday or Tuesday, before I knew of the burn bags. Later yet in the last update: "...it just so happens that Gallops have the Welsh DAVID Coat with a gold bend. That bend is with Moters while DAVID Morley was on a MOTORbike coming off the road. Davids and Gallups (Dorset with George's) have different-colors versions of the Coat of Gabbards..."

I now discover that the Burn-like Berns have a bear-version of the Gallup Coat!!! Thus, it's a gold-bend version of the David Coat. The Gallops had to do with my riding a horse to a BANK in the field, revealing that the hill upon which the sleeping bag was on is to be seen as a bank too, partly for Rodham-connectable Malbanks, and partly for Morley / Morland-connectable Banks. However, as Berns named Bern in Switzerland, Swiss banks come to mind, where gangsters launder their money. Online: "In Swiss banking documents related to some of Mr. Wexner's entities, Mr. Epstein's role was described as 'manager of fortune.'" Or: "Documents released without authorization from Swiss banks show that Epstein in February 1997 was ensconced in the offshore banking world."

From the 4th update of November, 2021:

I had a dream this Wednesday morning...I was watching a crow land on my STOVE BURNER(s). When one was really hot, I was kicking this crow off the burner (to save it) with my foot, but it refused to fly off, intent on coming back to stand on the burner, and that's when I awoke kicking a Mason jar in the bed. This time of year, I put two jars of hot water in bed with me because I don't heat the bedroom...

Burns (share black hunting horn with Bernice's) happen to share the chevron of Stove's/Stevensons (Northumberland, beside Burns and Bernice's), and the two surnames have fleur-de-lys in colors reversed from one another to boot...Burns have the motto, "Ever READy," and Reads/Reeds were first found in Northumberland with Stove's/Stevensons. But what do Crows have to do with this?

Stove's are also Stave's, which might point to Jes Staley. Staufers/Stovers/Stavers have a "cup" to go with the "copia" motto term of Reeds. Scottish Reeds are first known in Aberdeenshire with Cups/Cope's and Leslie's. The latter, in Kick/Keck colors and format, were kin of Case's, first known in Norfolk with Crows, very important because Kash's/Caseys have crow heads. Are we on to something? The crow looks like Mr. Patel such that it tends to prove that the burn bags are in the stove burner.

Berns are also Beorns while English Borns share the pegasus (different color) with BERNICE's/Burness', the latter first known in Cumberland with Burns. BERNICia is now Berwickshire, which has a bear in its Arms, the Bern symbol. Berwicks and Barwicks use bear heads.

The burn bags have thus far revealed RUSSIA-collusion data, and Russi's share the lion of Russells who in turn have a "sara" motto term while Sarah's/Sayers share the Barwick motto, "Bear and forbear." Russia is the bear.

One can now see that God intended the crow to be LANDING on the stove burner because Landons share the triple bear heads of Barwicks and Berwicks while Landens/Landers are first known in Switzerland with Berns. Should we start accepting that God arranged this heraldry to point the crow to the burn bags? Did God arrange the burn bags to survive the incinerator? Is He behind their exposure? Not if they turn out to be nothing-burgers.

So far, not many trust Kash Patel anymore. He may be trying to salvage his recently-dented reputation but with teasing, letting out token nothings. We already know that there was a staged coup; more evidence is nothing to celebrate without the first major arrests? I didn't see any jail bars around the stove burner. There's not even a Jail surname to go by in this picture. There is a Jall/Jell surname in Sarah/Sayer colors and format, but how can that combination point to jail terms?

I've just come across a Bloomberg headline: "Jes Staley and Jeffrey Epstein." The name "jes" reminds that English Morleys and Morlands/Mauleys use a JESSANT leopard face. Jessants come up as "Jess." See David Morley and the sleeping bag in the last update.

The jessant feature is also with Aids (BERWICKshire), and with Staple's suspect in "BARNstaple's" who happen to be in the colors and format of Stave-branch Stevensons/Steinsons (Essex with Sarah's/Sayers). Staple's share the motto of the Peters in turn first known in Devon with Barnstaple. Staple's share a "sans" motto term with Sarah-connectable Shakespeare's (Cumberland with Burns and Bernice's/Burness'). Staple's are very linkable to Leslie's, earls of Rothes.

The Aids are also Ade's suspect in the "ad" motto term of FISCs, a good pointer in this picture to the FISC, the FISA court abused by the Comey FBI to ruin Trump during the Russia-collusion hoax. I'll repeat that Fiscs are suspect with a Fieschi family that was partnered in Genova with Bag-connectable Grimaldi's. The latter are very suspect with Stave-loving PilGRIMs (Norfolk with Fiscs and Bags).

"ADsum" is a motto term of Jardins who in turn almost have the Coat of Stave-like Stable's/Staplers (share triple-white stars in Chief with Stave's/Stoves), first known in Somerset with the Cocks sharing the Fisc-like Shields of Bags and Grimaldi's. Jardins are excellent here because they are first known in Angus with Gardens/Jardens who in turn share the Coat of French JARRE's/Jarrets, which can explain why I kicked the Mason jar upon waking from the crow-on-burner dream. Staple's, sharing the Masci fleur-de-lys, are first known in Kent with Masons.

Staple-like Staleys/Staveleys not only share a gold "buck head" in their Crests with Hicks, but Staleys/STAVEleys are mainly in the colors and format of Hyke's/Hake's and Higgs, the latter two first known in Norfolk with Bucks, and with Pilgrims who use "STAVES." Above and beyond my claim (see last update) that Miss Hicks was on Epstein's island, Bags are connectable to Hawk-beloved Pilgrims, the latter first known in Norfolk with Hawk-like Hyke's/Hake's (Staley/Staveley colors and format) and Stave-branch Steins who could have named Epstein.

But, the burn bags have not revealed anything, yet anyway, on Jeffrey Epstein, and I doubt very much that Patel would release anything, anyway, if something were to be found on his crimes. I'm writing this in the evening, after writing the section below that's much on the Scoots, who share a "Haec" motto term with English Borns. Haeks/Hacks share the giant Giuffre unicorn.

German Steels are listed with Stale-like Stalls. Staleys are said to have named Stalybridge...in Cheshire, where Steele's and Shirts/Shards are first known; the latter are in Staley/Staveley colors and format.

MontaCUTE's are interesting for sharing the black border with Furnace's (Lancashire with Seats), interesting because the burn bags were destined for the furnace. Furnace's have a giant and "seated" black dog, the color of the very same seated dog in the Back/BAGH Crest. Coincidence? Doesn't look like. Bachs/Baghs call it a "talbot" dog while Talbots have the Coat of Greys in colors reversed, which should explain the CUTE greyhound. The "Cedes" variation of Seats is expected in the motto of Steers who are in turn in the "steer" of German Bachs/Backs. English Backs are first known in Somerset with MontaCUTE's.

If StaleyBRIDGE was named after a Staley-Bridge marriage, it's notable that Bridge's, first known in Somerset with Crawl-beloved Camels, Brits and Montacute's, have "crabs" while Crabs (CamBRIDGEshire) are also Crawl-like Crabs. Montacute's share the triple lozenges of Staleys/Staveleys.

The other English Bridge's, in the format and colors reversed from Staleys/Staveleys, share the white griffin with Steels/Stalls. The latter's griffin is in both colors with Italian Berts, and English Births/Berts were a branch of Burts, first known in Norfolk with Crawl-branch Crows. Birds/Burds are first known in Cheshire with Bride-branch Brights i.e. it's got Bridge-like surnames all over it.

The Swiss Berns above are also Barns, and then Bernie's/Barnys are in the colors and format of Steins, the latter first known in Norfolk with stave-using Pilgrims and Barn- / Brennan-like Brains, and then Steins share the Coat, in different colors, of English Stevensons/Steinsons while Stave's are listed with Scottish Stevensons/Steinsons. Is that telling or what? Irish Brennans share the Bernie/Barny lion and lion head of Bernans/Burnhams (Herefordshire with Bernie's/Barnys).

Thus far, the only burn-bag material released to the public concerns John Brennan's part in the Russia-collusion / Steele-dossier hoax.

Brains have one of the two pale bars of German Steels, and the latter share the Italian Bert griffin while English Berts share the Coat of Burts (Norfolk with Brains). Perhaps the Brains are to topic because John Brennan was the brains (spearhead) behind the Steele dossier. English Steele's are first known in Cheshire with the Propers/Roberts in the leopard head "proper" of Bernans/Burnhams who, along with Irish Brians, almost have the Proper/Robert and Robert lion. Brains have leopard faces.

Is Kash Patel the heat on the burner, since "heat" is slang for the cops? What individual does the crow represent? I'm investigating this dream under the assumption that the burner represents something in the burn bags, especially Brennan and company acting on Hillary-and-company's behalf. Kash Patel has secured the bags, and Kash's/Caseys use crow heads while Crows are first known in Norfolk with Case's who are in turn in the colors and format of Bernie's/Barnys and Steins (Norfolk with Fountains). Cash's/Cass' use "fountains". If Kash (dark skin) is the crow, what does it mean that he wants to land on the burner? Why might the Bag surname (same place as Crows) share the lozenges of Staleys/Staveleys while the latter are in Crow format and colors reversed?

All I saw was my own LEGs trying to push the crow away; I couldn't see my hips or higher. This could represent Trump as per Trumps almost having the Legg Coat. Why would Trump try to keep Patel away from John Brennan, if that's what the crow at the burner means? It's possible because, during Trump's first term, I had the sense that he had decided it best to lay off of some important individual / organization / group in return for it lay off of him. It left him no choice but to be sorely abused by the deep state without recourse of fighting back. Trump may do the same again now but with greater pretence of WANTING to arrest Brennan and company. The latter would be happy if all that is done is to expose them to some ridicule from Republicans.

I'm wondering whether "Keck" was a corruption of "Kerrick" because Carricks/Kerricks are first known in the same place as Craigie's who in turn share the Kick/Keck crescents while Craigs are first known in Aberdeenshire. Then, Carricks were a branch of Crow-like Carrows/Corrows. Ahh, Craggs (share black dog with Carricks) happen to have a bend-with-martlets in the colors and format of Kicks/Kecks! Why did I kick at the crow, to save if from harm, as a pointer to the Carrick bloodline?

Crow-branch Crawls/Croulls are listed with Crowells, and then Crulls/Criels have the Crail/Crab Coat in Burner colors. Then, the Stove Shield is the Crail/Crab and Hell Shield in colors reversed. I have a gas stove, and Gas' use a "goose" while Goose's/Googe's share the boar heads of Hell-like Hallys/Hellys.

Ahh, I think I get it, to some greater degree, anyway, because Criels/Cruels share double-red fesses with Perche's, and so the Crow was trying to perch on the burner! The English Papps, first known in Cambridgeshire with Crails/Crabs, essentially share the Criel/Cruel Coat. Papa's share the white swan (Bridge colors) with Cambridge's. The crow wanting to perch tends to convince me that God wants us on the Crails/Crabs because they share the Burn fleur-de-lys. Papps show a Papadopoli variation, wherefore George Papadopoulos, who spoke to Comey's FBI concerning Hillary's Russia hoax against Trump, could be pointed to in this paragraph.

To help prove that the Perche's apply to the dream, a "perch" is with English Botters while I've traced Italian Botters to the Comey-pointing Balcons/Balcolms, first known in Crail! While STANDs/Stains were a Stove branch, English Botters have a "red eagle standing on a silver perch." It's excellent proof that Perche's are in this crow dream. It means that God set up heraldry centuries ago for making pointers, through me, to news events. I suppose He wants credit for those events, or wants us to know that He's involved with the deep state's exposure, to weaken it, but not because He loves the Republican party, but because he hates the anti-Christs.

Burners have the quadrants of Spains/EsPAYNE's in colors reversed, and the latter are first known in Somerset with Roets and their Payne branch, and with the Camels in the Crow and Crawl Crests. Scottish Roets share the "book" with Scottish Reeds, and German Roets share the Kick/Keck crescent in giant form. Roets named Rothes (on Spey river) at Moray, and Durhams share the Moray stars. Masons, who have two variations in their motto of the Spears/Speyers expected at Moray's Spey river, share the Moray mermaid. The Carrows above are first known in Cornwall with Spear-like Spree's/Sprays while Sparrows and Spare's are first known in Norfolk with Crows. Spears are in the Carrick Crest.

I was kicking the Mason jar when waking from this dream. Masons share the mermaid in Crest with Byrne's, and the Certs/Cards suspect in the "Certavi" motto term of Byrne's (hands) have a giant lion head in the colors of the lion of English Brennans. Card-like Carts are first known in Somerset with Bridge's who in turn share the griffin of the Letters in the Cert/Card Crest.

Brennans share the giant lion of Carrick-related Bruce's, yet Irish Brennans have the lion of SALISbury-related Abreu's/ABRUZzo's. Certs/Cards are first known in Shropshire (Salop) with the Salop-like Sallows/Sallis' possibly in the "salus" motto term of Sparrows. The latter almost have the Coat of German Rose's, first known near the Spree river.

"CerTAVI" can be part-code for the Tave variation of Touch's (Aberdeenshire) because they share the Coat of JARRys/Hare's. It looks like we're on the right track of discovery when going to Byrne's, who share the mermaid in Crest with English Byrons (Yorkshire with Craggs and Greggs) while the Hogs in the "hedgehogs" of Byroms/Byrams (not "Byron"), first known in DURHAM (!), share the black-on-white boar head of Gardens/Jardens and Jarrets/Jarre's!!! I kicked the Mason jar, and Masons have the Byrne / Byron mermaid!

Ghislaine Maxwell was moved very recently to a prison on BYRAN, Texas.

Blue-boar Barone's/Barrons are in the colors and format of the Mate's possibly in the Jarry/Hare motto, and Scottish Hare's are first known in Ayrshire with Barrs, Carricks and Craigie's while Craigs are first known in Aberdeenshire with the Tave's/Touch's sharing the Jarry/Hare lion. In fact, Mate's are in the colors and format of Stable's/Staplers who in turn almost have the Coat of Jarre-branch Jardins! It suggests a Hare-line merger with Jardin elements. Staple's share the motto of Peters, first known in Devon Barnstaple's and Mate-connectable Manders. The latter can be suspect in the "salamander" of Douglas' who in turn share the Stove/Stave Chief.

Durhams are to topic due to Kash Patel set to reveal John Durham's annex (addendum to this investigation), which is the only part of the burn-bag material that the public knows about as yet. John Durham revealed that when Papadopoulos (minor Trump advisor) spoke to the FBI, his claims were dismissed.

Barone's/Barrons are first known in Waterford while Waterfords/Waterville's share the fountains of Cash's/Cass' while Case's are first known in Norfolk with Fountains. Waterfords/Waterville's are first known in Northamptonshire with Ladys/Laudymans who are in turn in "Lady Fortune"" of Class'/Klassens while Barone's/Barrons, with a "Fortuna" motto term, share the Lady/Laudyman annulets.

The Hogs are excellent for sharing the rooted tree in Crest with Roet-connectable Roots, and Picks. I picked up a sleeping BAG in another dream, which was in the woods, and Woods share the tree too but also the Pick fitchees. Then, Roots share the Coat of Bag-connectable Bagleys, first known in Shropshire! Roots and Picks are first known in Kent with Masons and Sleeps. The crow dream is connecting to the sleeping-bag dream.

The Root / Bagley lozenge in on blue, as is the lozenge of German Camels while English Camels are first known in Somerset with Scottish Roets. Crows have a camel head.

Kent's Root-like Rothes', once said to be first known in Shropshire with Sleeps and a Sleap location, have lion heads in the colors of the giant lion of Jarre-connectable English Jarrets, the latter first known in Shropshire. Jarre's/Jarrets are first known in Brittany with Brest while Brests/Brix's share the Camel lozenge.

This could be a pointer to Gregg Jarret, though he's merely a news guest, yet he's supportive of prosecutions for the Brennan circle. Both Gregg surnames along with Craggs can be shown to be a Carrick branch, and the Talbots in the Cragg and Carrick Coats are first known in Shropshire too. Jarrys/Hare's have a fox head while Gregg Jarret has been a guest on Fox news for many years. However, as there are countless news guests gunning for prosecutions, why would this dream point specially to Mr. Jarret (lawyer)? Jarrys/Hare's love the Fear variation of Fiers while my gas stove has fire at the element.

Durhams share the Stove and Armor stars while Armors have a "CASSis" motto term. Durhams put them on a fesse so as to be the fesse-with-stars of Scottish Weirs/Vere's who in turn share a gold boar in Crest with Reed-beloved Evers who in turn share the quadrants of English Vere's. The latter ruled Oxfordshire, where Crow-branch Crawls are first known. This has just turned into an amazing paragraph because, not until after the last sentence was written did I remember that Irish Weirs use a lozengy Shield, and its in the colors of the lozengy Shield of Bags!!! The latter are first known in Norfolk with the Hollys in the Crest of Irish Weirs. Durham is a location on the WEAR river, and Wears share the crosslets of Touch-branch Tafts/Tuffs'.

Ahh, the Scottish Lums in the Stove motto are first known in the same place as Stove's (near Burns), but the English Lums (Byrne colors and near-format) have the triple eagle heads of Irish Caseys in colors reversed while Scottish Kash's/Caseys have crow heads. The dream thus tends to prove itself as having Intelligent Design behind it, and it does seem to indicate Kash Patel, and therefore the stove burner looks like a pointer to the burn bags. Both Lums are in Crow colors and near format, and Crows are in the format of, and colors reversed from, Byrne's. Barone's/Barrons share the blue boar in Crest with English Vere's, but the blue boar is also with CROWleys who in turn share the triple Taft/Tuffs crosslets.

Some annex material was released (I think by Grassley) Thursday saying that Hillary's "political director," Amanda Renteria, "regularly receives information from Attorney General Loretta Lynch on the plans and intentions of the FBI [Comey, at the time]." That's exactly the weaponization of federal police and Intelligence, and she clearly wanted to hear from the FBI on how her plots against Trump were coming along. Clinton was not part of the Obama administration at the time, and so the FBI had no business keeping her up-to-date on FBI matters. The PICTURE IS CLEAR.

She's guilty of election interference and slander on a broad stage, and it's to be expected that she was later behind a begging of Obama to weaponize the FBI further, after Trump won the election, to have him replaced by herself. That's akin to treason with bona fide government weaponry.

Just want to add that Leonard Bernardo, a Soros operative, is part of the annex in support of Hillary's crimes, and then Italian Bernardo's/BERNo's have a Coat a little like the Staufer/Stover/Staver Coat. STOVE BURNER. The latter surname's cup on a hand looks like a glass, perhaps because it may have been at one time in honor of a Glass surname. Bernardo's/Berno's have "hands CLASped", and share a blue Shield with Class'/Klassens. Byrne's have hands. "ClaSPED" can be part-code for Speeds, said to include a Mr. Sped, because Speets share white pheons with Glaze's (Yorkshire with Glaze's). Speets share the blue "jay" with Davers/Daves' in turn first known in Suffolk with Speeds.

I don't even know who Jes Staley is yet. Wikipedia: "'Barclays Says U.K. Is Probing CEO Jes Staley's Ties to Jeffrey Epstein'. ... 'Barclays Freezes Jes Staley's Deferred Pay Until Epstein Probe Concludes'." Staley was a CEO of a JP Morgan bank. "It was reported that Staley and Epstein exchanged 1,200 emails over the course of four years. In this correspondence, Staley used a mystery phrase 'Snow White', the meaning of which has not been established." Looks like we've got someone who the FBI should put on the DoJ's Epstein client list.

Miss Hicks went to a church with me in Barksdale, Texas. It just so happens that Barksdale's are in Barclay colors and format. Therefore, Sleeping Beauty, on Epstein's island, can point to Jes Staley of the Barclay bank. Barksdale's use the five arrows (same colors) in the Arms of Rothschild. Barks are first known in Norfolk.

Kash Patel said on Joe Rogan that he himself found a locked, secret room in the Hoover Building filled with documents AND "thumb drives." He didn't say whether the thumb drives were in the burn bags, but this room is where the burn bags were discovered. The problem is, pro-Trumpers don't trust Kash to use the most-condemning documents against those who deserve condemnation.

Hacking the DNC

I saw a video this week (Megyn Kelly, Tuesday) telling that James Clapper and Jay Johnson, head of Obama's Homeland Security, spread the fake reality that Russia HACKed the DNC servers. This goes to Sleeping Beauty of the last update, Mrs. Kilpatrick, born Miss Hicks, because Scottish Johnsons have a red-Chief version of the Scottish Kilpatrick Coat, and because Hicks' were a branch of Hyke's/HAKE's, first known in Devon with Patricks and dagger-using Comyns/Comine's. Her Barksdale church had/has a pastor Johnson (not of course saying he or she were involved with Epstein). Hooks, first known in Devon with Hykes'/HACKs, have a blue-Shield version of the Hicks Coat.

Jay Johnson takes us to BALCONs/BalCOME's, who were to topic in the last update as per Lorraine's grass stain which I saw on her BALCONy. It points to James Comey. Balcons/Balcome's share the bend-with-roses of Jays, shared also by French Chatans while English Cattans share the cat with Catch's (Norfolk with Cattans and Hyke's/Hake's) who in turn share the scallops of Hackers. See that? Catch's have a near-copy of the Hacker Coat.

The reality that the DNC wanted to keep from people is that their own SETH Rich is the one who did the hack, whom the Democrats murdered on account of it, because the hack ruined Hillary Clinton. Seths/Shaws share the dagger with Scottish Kilpatricks.

The Seths/Shaws and the Kilpatricks both have the Comyns in their write-ups' In the Kilpatrick write-up, in what could easily be a fable to hide the real reason for the Kilpatrick dagger and motto, king Bruce accuses John Comyn of betrayal, and then a Kilpatrick kills Comyn with a dagger. I did read that Miss or Mrs. Comyn was mother to Adam Kilconquhar, first husband of Marjory Carrick who married a Bruce of Annandale secondly, the ancestry of the royal Bruce's.

The spur in the Crest of Scottish Johnsons is important because Close's and KNIGHTs have the spur while Kilpatrick castle at CLOSEburn is in the NITH river. Knights look related to the Make's/Macks in the Kilpatrick motto. Patricks are first known in Norfolk with the Drops, honored in the "blood drops" dripping from the Kilpatrick dagger, and Spurrs are first known in Devon with Hooks and Hacks, and with Supers sharing the Kilpatrick and Patrick saltire. Devon is also where Seagars/SICKERs are first known, and the Kilpatrick motto had a variation, "I make sicker."

Seagar-like Segurs are first known in Limousin with the Chatans above who helped take us to Hackers. The latter almost have the Catch/Catcher Coat while "fly-catcher" is a motto phrase of Drake's, first known in Hampshire with Flys and Rich's. Flys were at Flagi while Flags, first known in Norfolk with Hyke's/Hake's and Fountains, share the scallops of Hykes'/Hacks (Devon with Seagars/Sickers). Seth RICH. Fountains are in the Coat of SICHs/Sykes'.

Seagars/Sickers have "snakes" in Crest while Snake's/Snooks have a Coat much like the Close / Clows Coat. In the dream, I saw a CLOSE-up of Sleeping Beauty, and remarked, "SHE's beautiful." Shee's, sharing the fleur-de-lys of Irish Kilpatricks and Hooks, share a Shea variation with English Shaws. The Snooks remind of the snooker shot I took on Obama's billiard table (see last update for that) that pointed to his part in the Russia-hoax crimes. But, was he also privy to Rich's murder?

As Tony Fauci made people very sick, I'll add that Seagars/Sickers have the moline cross of Segurana's in colors reversed, and the latter are first known in Genova with Fauci's. Then, Fauch's show only thistle's while English Johnsons share the Thistle/THISSle pheons. TISS'/Teese's are first known in Hampshire with Rich's and Buttons/BOTTONs/BIDENs. Seth RICH was murdered while Joe Biden, a literal government gangster, was vice-president. Rich's use BOTTONy crosses, perhaps arranged by God to show that Biden played a role in the murder with Jack Sava, the Hillary-supporting physician who oversaw Rich's gunshot wounds.

Sleeping Beauty, in real life, married Hamilton Kilpatrick, and Hamiltons use a Shaw- / Save-like "saw." Sawers/Sawyer have Seagar elements in their write-up. Hamiltons are first known in Renfrewshire with Scottish JACKs who in turn share "holly" with the Sure's in the Kilpatrick motto, "I make sure."

In the year following the murder of Rich (July, 2016), after Hillary Clinton lost the election (November 2016) such that many criminal goons lost a lot of government money that would have poured from her hand as president, Fauci, an avid supporter of Hillary Clinton, announced that there would soon be a pandemic.

The Kilpatricks adopted a daughter, Geneva, and Geneva's are listed with Genova's, what now looks like a pointer to Sickers, Segurana's, and Tony Fauci, because Segurs share the Geneva/Genova lion.

Kent HECKENlively wrote at least one book detailing Fauci's crime(s). It's interesting that Heckens, listed with Dutch Hacks, share goat heads (different colors) with Seagar- and Segurana-beloved Moline's.

I recall that Segurs, because they and BEDINs almost have the same Coat, pointed to Huma ABEDIN with the help of a HOME plate in a baseball diamond. Home are also HUME's. Abedin was the second in command of Hillary's 2016 presidential bid, second only to the reported pedophile, John Podesta. Abedin was married to the pedophile, Anthony Weiner, and reports had been that Hillary stored her government emails, from her private server, onto Weiner's computer. FBI director Comey let her get away with using the private server, a breaking of the law.

Weiner's are listed with Wansteads, and Childs, a pointer to pedophiles, apparently, are said to have been at a Wanstead location near Epping. I showed in the last update, with the help of Lorraine's grass stain, that the Epstein bloodline likely named Epping. As I've said a million times, the last time I saw Lorraine (about 21 years old at the time), she was carrying an infant child, and Lorraine's share the Child eagle.

On September 11, 2002, when our pastor JOHNSON put on an outdoor meet to remember 9-ll a year earlier, I was talking to Mrs. Kilpatrick, who told me that the seat beside her is reserved for Geneva, but that I could sit there, and that, if she arrived, "you can SCOOT over," she said to me. So I sat beside Mrs. Kilpatrick (Geneva never arrived). Scoots/Scougals, likely a branch of Knight-loving Shoe's/Schugs, have a "Haec" motto term while Haeks are listed with German HACKs.

Trump admitted this week that Jeffrey Epstein "stole" his employees from the spa at the Mar-a-Lago, including, apparently, Virginia Giuffre. However, as Trump has openly fingered prince Andrew at Epstein's island, it tends to assure that almost nobody knows that Trump was there, or that he was never there at all, or he wouldn't finger prince Andrew only to get accused in return.

Giuffre's share the giant unicorn of Haeks/Hacks, and Hookers were early in Norfolk with Hake's. Trump's admission may be due to his knowledge that this information was likely set to become publicized by others, and so he wants his side of the story out, which is that he at first knew nothing of Epstein's theft of his employees, and that he, Trump, was opposed to it. But, was he really?

Without going over the details, she got a knee symbol later that evening, and it was the thing that really had me believing that she was the fulfillment of Sleeping Beauty. There were other reasons. I touched Beauty's knee, in the 1979 dream, which is the scene that made her wake up. But what I'm about to add is new, from the last update, where I said:

As the Wake write-up has the following, I can now glean, for the first time, that the Wake fesses are related to the fesses of Wiles' and Camerons/CAMERA's, both sharing five, bunched arrows: "The surname Wake was first found in Lincolnshire where they held a family seat as Lords of the manor of Wilsford (Wivelesforde) and under tenants of Godfrey de CAMBRAi, and represented by Le Sire de Wake. HUGo Wach..." The latter character could be as per the hug at the wake scene of Sleeping Beauty. Wachs are listed with Walks (same place as Kilpatricks).

Walks share the wheat sheaf of WAKEfields. The point is, the Camera's were discovered, only yesterday as I write here, as apparent wake kin, and the reason I was talking to her at the 9-11 memorial, in order to have her say, "scoot over," was that I had just come back to her from setting up her video camera at the front row and pointed to the stage.

"Scoot over" got us to Haeks/Hacks, and while Seth Rich hacked the DNC servers and exposed Hillary Clinton's election interference on Bernie Sanders, her opponent and Rich's candidate. Rich's, from Richeza of Lorraine, are in the colors and format of Hack-branch Hicks', what are the chances? It appears that not surprising by well taken her.

It appears that God caused me to get up from my seat, to go ask her if she'd like me to set up her video camera. Then, when I went back to her, it seems he caused me to ask whether anyone was sitting beside her, otherwise "scoot over" would not have happened. But, you may be wondering, what does a pointer to Seth Rich's hacking have to do with 9-11?

Her knee symbol was on the "Leakey road," that being Ranch road out of Camp Wood (Texas) that takes one to Leakey. Leaks/Leakeys share the Hicks fleur-de-lys, and are first known in Lincolnshire with Lakeys who are in turn first known in Dumbartonshire with Eure's while Hicks have a "heure" motto term. Aside from the holly of Lakeys, they are in the colors and format of Hyke's/Hake's (Norfolk with Hollys). The Prime's (Lincolnshire with Leakeys and Eagle's/Hegels), suspect in the Lakey motto, have a giant leg to go with the eagle legs of Hicksons.

Thus, Leaks/Leakeys, who share the engrailed bend of Knee's, were Hicks kin. And there were reasons why this knee event at the Leakey road pointed to the imprisonment of WikiLEAKs founder, Julian Assange, the one who received Seth Rich's DNC material. Assange had published it.

Miss Hicks SANG two songs on the outdoor stage that night. AsSANGe. Sangers/Singers (Devon with Hacks and Singer-like Sickers) share the wheat SHEAVES of Sithech-like Sticks and Stichs, and while Seths/Shaws are said to be from "Sithech," Shee's share a Shea variation with English Sheaves'/Shaws who in turn share "vincit" with the Sanger/Singer motto.

Gamble's share the lone Leakey fleur. The first Gamble surname in the Gamble write-up is Mr. Gamel of Lincolnshire, where Leakeys are first known. The "Leakey road" from Camp Wood is the Ranch road, and German Rench's essentially share the Gamble Coat. English Rench's are first known in Cambridgeshire with Muskets/Musks in the "musket" of new-to-me-now Hackings/Hockings (share Hatch/Hacch lion). Hockeys are first known in Essex with CAMULodunum, and with the Muschats sharing the Epstein Coat.

Muskets/Musks are first known in the same place as Gull-branch English Julians, looking like a pointer to Julian Assange! This amazing pointer, which occurs using WikiLeaks-like Leaks/Leakeys, was not possible apart from Hackings/Hockings. I don't know any other surname with a musket. I'm not trying to make an Epstein link to Assange or Elon Musk. I'm going to Epsteins because Sleeping Beauty was on his island.

I'm not sure whether "you can scoot over" is supposed to be pointing to Elon Musk via the potential link of Hackings/Hockings to the Scoot motto.

While Scoots (share border of English Scotts) have the Haeks/Hacks, to be assumed, in their motto, English Scotts, first known in Kent with Sea's and Gulls (compare with German Julians) in the "seagull" of Hackings/Hockings, share the black, half-griffin with Hockeys. I find this amazing corroboration that Hacks are in the Scoot motto. "You can scoot over," she said, on the NUECES Canyon road, about 100 yards from the Ranch road. The News'/NUCES' (share "chaplet" with Hicks) are first known in Cambridgeshire with Rench's and Muskets/Musks. Miss Hicks lived on a large RANCH on the Neuces Canyon road, a ranch on direct Neuces-river waterfront.

Muskets/Musks were formerly first known in Suffolk with Sea-branch Seamans, and the latter two share the bars in the Hacker Crest! We can even add that the six pale bars of Gulls are in colors reversed with Scottish Jeffreys, for this can point to Jeffrey Epstein. The triple-wavy bars of Sea's (Kent with English Trips) belong to German Drummonds (Hamburg with German Trips), and English Trips share the crosslets of English Rench's/WRENch's and Wrens. German Trips love the Shoe's having variations like the Scougal variation of Scoots.

The wavy Sea fesses are in colors reversed in the "fountains" of Sichs/Sykes', and these wavy bars are also with Tuckers/Tokers (share sea-horse with Seamans), first known in Devon with Seagars/SICKers.

Wrens are said to have been a branch of Raines' in turn first known in Essex with Hockeys. The latter share the fesse-with-crescents of Hazels (Devon with Esse's) who share a Hessel variation with Hesse's. Epsteins are first known in Hesse. I touched Sleeping Beauty's leg to wake her, and Leaks/Leakeys (same place as Wake's) have a leg in Crest. Trumps share the Coat, almost, of Leggs/Legges', and then "leges" is a Raines motto term. Miss Hicks has a Rena middle name, and Reines' share the "comet" with Italian Stefans while English Stephensons are first known in Essex with Raines'. German Stevens share the Coat of Knights in the "knight" of Scoot-connectable Shoe's/Schugs. Comets are first known in Limousin with Chatans and Sicker-connectable Segurs.

Trump and Epstein

Leckie's of the Lakeys are said to have been in County Antrim while Antrims/Antinghams (Norfolk with Hollys) share the Holly (and Lake) bend. Antinghams lived on the Ant river, perhaps in the "Haec ornANT" motto of Scoots.

Antinghams got suspect (two or three updates ago) from Sant'Antioco in SARDinia, and Shirts/SHARDs would be fully in Lakey colors and format if the Lakey holly was just another of the two roses shown. If Lakeys had three roses instead of the two, they would share the Coat of English LINE's, first known in Oxfordshire with Lake's. Flynns/LYNNs are first known in County Antrim.

In the Beauty dream, I had no shirt on. The impression above is that Hicks or proto-Hicks were on Sardinia with Lakey elements. It recalls my theory that the Sea Peoples (Invaded Egypt), which included Sardinians, had been led by the descendants of the Hyksos proper of Egypt seeking to get their Egyptian throne back.

Bondi's, first known in Sardinia with Lago's/Logu's, share the Lago Chief. I may have missed this link except that I made the MAR-a-LAGO statement above, loading Lago's at that time. Lago's/Logu's have a good reflection of the Bongino Coat. Pam Bondi's, Dan Bongino's boss, is from Florida, location of Mar-a-Lago. Scottish Mars are in Sleep colors and format. I woke Sleeping Beauty when touching her Lago-like leg, and French Mars share the scallops of Hackers and Catch's (Norfolk with Hookers). Dutch Tromps have a giant eagle in the colors of the Hickson eagle legs, and Hackers are first known in Sussex with Tromp-beloved and Knee-connectable Acorns.

French Mars (almost the Hatch/Hacch Coat) are in Marone colors and format, and Marone's share the boar of Haleys, the latter first known in SLIGO with Higgins/Hickens and Hickensons. Higgs, first known in Norfolk with Hyke's/Hake's, are in the colors and format of Hyke's/Hake's and Shirts/Shards, and in the format of, and colors reversed from, Sligo-like Slicks. It again appears that Hicks' were from Hyksos of Sardinia. Sant'Antioco is at Slick-like Sulcis.

Slicks look like they are using the Halper and Halp/Help fitchee, and then Avezzano's of Sardinia are a branch of the namers of Avesnes on the Helpe river...in Artois, location of Arras. The Arrows in the Wiles Crest are listed with Arras', first known in Staffordshire with Hicksons.

Mar-a-Lago takes us now to Marone-like Marano's sharing the giant lion of Logu-like Loge's/Lodge's in the "lodged" stag of MAXWELLs (Roxburghshire with Mole's and Googe's both sharing the Marone boar head). Spanish Marano's look absolutely related to the Lago/Logu Coat! Surprise. Ghislaine MAXWELL, Trump's old friend, though he now acts like he doesn't know her. He and Bondi may be preparing Maxwell's pardon. I've wondered what Bondi's teenage history is. She looks like a model type.

Roxburghshire is where Maxwells, Maxtons and Chatan-branch Chattans/Cato's are first known who in turn look related to English Castle's, the latter first known in Sussex with Catch-connectable Hackers. Those Castle's share the bee in Crest with Maxtons, and Maxwells were at Maxton. Both Lago's/Logu's and Spanish Marano's show the Chatan tower, yet both are called a "castle". Then, German Cassels, showing a castle, show triple-red chevrons, the symbol of Epsteins, the latter first known in Hesse-Nassau while Rothschild bankers are thought to have derived their fortune from a prince William of Hesse-Cassel. The triple Cassel chevrons (they would be chevrons if the castle were not on the other half of the Shield) are shared by Clare's, first known in Suffolk with Marano-connectable Loge's/Lodge's.

Note how Nassau's can point to the NSA Intelligence agency in the United States.

Italian Casino's have three of the Casano fesses, and Casano's/Cassandra's are first known in Modena with Italian Marano's. English Cassane's/Cassandra's share the triple Epstein chevrons in both colors.

Tony Blair

My sitting with Mrs. Kilpatrick at 9-11 can actually point to George Bush's alliance with prime minister Tony Blair of Britain. The two of them maintained the Middle-East war effort based on a staged attack at the Trade towers. I set up her CAMERA at the STAGE, and then British prime minister David Cameron (Obama years) can apply there, for as Blairs share a "STAG lodged" and saltire of Maxwells, it can be the Kilpatrick saltire too, as per the "I MAKE sure" motto of Kilpatricks. The Sure's happen to share the CAN/Caen motto. "You CAN SCOOT over," she said, as I returned to her seconds after setting up her camera. Staggs/STAGE's use stag heads. Blairs and Maxwells thus point to Robert Maxwell, Ghislaine Maxwell's father, who was with British and Israel Intelligence. It's built-in into the heraldry that includes Kilpatricks.

The CIA created foreign agendas, then staged drastic events to urge and justify those agendas. It's well known now. The Blairs have a "proBOS" motto term, and Dutch Bos' list Bush's too. Bush Sr. ran the CIA.

Blairs happen to share the "Amo" motto term of Scottish Scotts while English Scotts (Kent with British's) share the Scoot border. See that? Tony Blair must be in "scoot over." English Scotts have a "STAG TRIPpant," in brown, same as the Blair / Maxwell stag. English Scotts are first known in Kent with Trips. "TripPANT can indicate Panters because they have "spur rowells." I showed above how heraldic spurs link to Closeburn, location of Kilpatrick castle.

Spurrs are first known in Devon with Supers, Hazels, Hooks, Staggs/Stage's, and SEAGARs/Sickers. Blairs are in Super colors and format for linkage to an expected Kilpatrick-Spurr / Kilpatrick-Super merger. Mrs. Kilpatrick at the 9-11 memorial. Mr. Kilpatrick was not there.

Scottish Scotts share the Hazel / Hockey crescents. English Scotts have a "demi griffin SEGReant with gold BEAK and legs," indicating a Scott link to "I make SICKER." Beaks are first known in Dorset with Cans/Caens who share the Sure motto. "I make sure." Note "segreANT" as per the Ant river, for Seagars and Sawyers were both once said to be first known in Norfolk with the Ant river.

The Blairs (share Whalley mascle) happen to have the mascle of English Faux's in colors reversed while French Faux's/Fage's are first known in Perigord with Fauchys. Then, Seagars have the giant moline cross of SEGNI's/Segurana's in colors reversed, and the latter, suspect in the "signo" motto term of Face's, are first known in Genova with Fauci's. Devon is also where Tony-beloved Flowers are first known. Tony Blair. Tony Fauci.

Plus, to make sure, Face's are first known in Northampton with Quincys while Saer de Quincy is in the write-up of FAUCets, first known in East Lothian with Scoots! God is making sure that we cannot deny His setting me up with Mrs. Kilpatrick at the outdoor meet. I took a SEAT beSIDE her, and Seatons/Sittens, first known in East Lothian too, share "hazard" with the motto of SIDE-branch Sutys/Suddy's. Seaton-branch SEDans/Siddens are suspect with the Seed variation of Seats, first known in Lancashire with the Cars having a "sed" motto term, and with Scute's/Scutts. She was hovering in the car, and Hovers/Hoffers (leopard FACEs) could have been a branch of Overs/Offers. "Scoot OVER."

Seeds/Seats are also Cedes', and "cede" is a motto term of Steers who in turn look related to the Coat of Blair like Billers/BELLers. When I woke her by touching her leg, she pointed to Walker-connectable Walks/Wachs, first known in Dumfries with Bells. George Bush Jr. was the son of George Walker Bush, and Walkers are first known in Yorkshire with Bush's and Walk-connectable Wakefields.

Hover-like Hoovers share the eagle leg with Hicksons. The description of Scottish Scotts, the ones sharing "amo" with Blairs, mention gold "HOOVES" for their stag. "Scoot over" is thus linking to the hover-over-seats scene, more proof that Mrs. Kilpatrick fulfills Sleeping Beauty. The heraldic hoof can be code for the Hoff variation of Hovers/Offers. English Hoffs and Overs/Offers are first known in Cheshire with HAUGHtons/Hottens and Hootens while Hoovers share the giant eagle leg of Hooters/Hutters.

Miss Hicks didn't know heraldry when she was born, or when she was married to the doctor that pulled her from the womb, yet Hicksons (Staffordshire with Solways/SALLOWays) have a saltire-by-eagle-legs colors reversed to the Solway/Salloway saltire, and the Nith river of the Kilpatricks has a mouth at the Solway firth.

Sallows have a "willow tree" while Willows/Willoughby's are first known in Lincolnshire with Swallows. The proto-Geddes Geds, on the Nith from 400 AD, use pike fish in the colors of the Way/Weigh fish, and so Ways could have Created SalloWAYs. As Wedge's and their branches can be linked to Wake's, note the Weigh's, for Swallows are first known in Lincolnshire with Swallows. Perhaps this picture somehow explains why the shark half-swallowed the bulldog. The motto of Bracebridge's (Lincolnshire) incorporates the whole Willow/Will motto.

She was hovering in the AIR above the car SEATs, and Airs/Eyers/Ayers, showing a LEG with SPUR, can be shown to have named Blairs because they are also BelAIRs/BELLairs, and first known in AYRshire with Ayers having a "Lighter than air" motto. AMAZING. Thus, Blairs look like a branch of Bellers, and Tony Blair appears to be in the hover scene without doubt. He could have been close to the Maxwells and/or Jeffrey Epstein. Just guessing.

She was hovering on her back, and German Backs use the giant "steer" while Steers almost have the Beller Coat. See that? Beauty is pointing to Tony Blair, though he's also suspect with the 9-11 events themselves, not just the Middle-East wars. Sturs, with a Steer-like Styre variation, happen to have the Cameron/Camera Coat in colors reversed!

I now recall Mr. Reinecker asking me to feed about a dozen of his long-horned steer on my property because of a drought. I happily agreed. Reineckers are listed with Reine(s)', and "Rena" is Mrs. Kilpatrick's middle name. It tends to convince me that her hovering on her back is a pointer to Backs and Steers, and therefore to Bellers.

English Backs are first known in Somerset with Reno-connectable MontaCute's, near the source of the Stur-related Stour river of Dorset, which source is at least near the first-known Shute's/SCHUTE's. The Stour's mouth is near Poole, and Poole's love Somerset's Pollets who show only three white swords, which is all that Shute's/Scute's show. Poole may therefore be in the Reinecker/Reines lion, white like the Raines lion. News'/Nuces are first known in Cambridgeshire with Bellers, and with Wren-branch Rench's/Wrench's. Raines' happen to share one of the Steer lions, and the one-half of the Beller lion. Both Miss Hicks and I had NUECES-riverfront property. (We were not in a relationship).

I've mentioned before, many times, that German Neckers have one of the two pale bars of Newes'/NUSE's, a pointer to the noose staged around Epstein's neck. News'/NUCES' share a chaplet (different color) with Hicks', itself "GORGEd" around the NECK of the Hicks buck. English George's, looking a little related to the Coat of Parchments in the News/Nuces Crest, are first known in Dorset with the Stour river. Parchments are listed with Parkmans while Parkers (Somerset) who in turn have a "buck's head" while sharing the antler (different color) with English Bucks (Norfolk with Hyke's), and even have it in red, the colors of the "deer"-with-antlers of Dutch Necks/Neckers. The other English Parkers have a "stag TRIPpant" while English Trips share the "scaling ladder" with Lloyds. I looked the latter up because Lloyd was Reinecker's first name.

Note the Buck ANTlers, for Bucks are first known in Norfolk with the Ant river. Then, "antLER" can be part-code for French Leirs because they share the scallops of Norfolk's Flags/Flecks.

Sturs/Styre's are first known in Hampshire with TWINs. Steers share the giant bull of Beauty-branch Boets/Boeddu's, and Beautys have bulls in the colors of the Lovicks/Lofwicks, The latter are in the Tower write-up as Tower kin. The TWIN TRADE TOWERs. TRADE's/Trotte's share the fleur of German Bush's, and Trots are first known in Surrey with Steers. Lovicks/Lofwicks even share the saltire of Irish Kilpatricks. Love's/Luffs are first known in Oxfordshire with the Oileys suspect in the Twin estOILes. Oh wow, ESToile's can be part-code for Este's and Esters/STURs (!), both first known in Essex. Therefore, the Twins are pointing to Tony Blair through Bellers.

Bells are first known in Dumfries with Leggs, and with Kilpatricks sharing the BELair saltire. Therefore, suddenly, the hovering of Sleeping Beauty can point even to the 9-11 fiends, and may signal that the British may have set the explosives in the twin towers.

I'm now reminded that German Boschs have the giant Bush/Busch cinquefoil in TWIN form!!! Unfortunately, Hall of Names doesn't list German Boschs for to give us an official description. But with houseofnames, the DOUBLE Bosch fleur are touching, partly SUPER-imposed! Double's/Dobells use Bells! Boschs/Bos'/Bush's hare billets (different colors) with Supers! The latter are in Blair colors and format.

Double's/Dobells have a "buck beTWEEN three bells". Tweens are listed with Twins! They use estOILEs while Oileys are first known in the same place as Bee's. BEtween.

Double's/Dobells are first known in Norfolk with English Bucks, Hyke's/Hake's, Higgs, and Este-connectable HEADs/Heeds, and then Hicks have a "buck's HEAD." Hats/Hades', sharing the quadrants of Haydens, are first known in Dorset with Beautys who in turn share the bull of the other Haydens, both first known in Norfolk with Heads/Heeds.

New: Michael Hayden (military war hawk) was Bush junior's last CIA director, and Haydens deputy director was Michael Kerr. New: Cars list Kerrs. New: Kerr, as Director of the National Reconnaissance Office, was preceded by Peter B. TEETs, and the Beauty dream opened with the shark showing me its nasty TEETH. I don't know whether Mr. Teets is nasty, for I know nothing about him. He was with the AIRforce. WikiLeaks exposes murderous crimes in Iraq by war jets. Hamilton Kilpatrick has an obituary online telling that he was a plane pilot. Mrs. Teeter's husband, Mr. Teeter, managed ship pilots in the Gulf of Mexico for BRITISH Petroleum. Pilate's/Pilots share the Lord/Laud and Glaze pheons.

Teeters (Pomerania with Trumps) have a dog in Trump colors and format! It's almost the Fortune dog, and I showed how Beauty's CLASSIC (1950's model) car can point to Lady Fortune of Class'/Klassens via Glass'/Glassicks and the Glasgow motto with Lords/Lauds connectable to Ladys/Laudymans.

Days after I met Mrs. Teeter (Texas), we went to church together, and after attending a few times, she told me that the man sitting regularly, directly in front of us (two feet away), was Hamilton Kilpatrick, Beauty's husband! His wife was not attending that church at that time (1999). I didn't meet Beauty until 2002, at another church.

As per Teets' resignation in 2005, I'm reading: "'Mr. Teets has led the Air Force through a critical transition period, and it has been my honor to serve with him,' said Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. John P. JUMPER." I've said a million times that the bulldog JUMPED into the swimming pool with nasty shark! Jumps/Jumpers (share Belly and Paisley roses) share the Trump stag head, and Trump created Space Force, an additional arm of the Air Force. To whom is Trump tied to in the Air Force?

Sleeping Beauty was hovering in the air, and J. Egdar Hoover made for a nasty FBI. Someone at Reddit: "[Hoover] and his men fabricated embarrassing evidence against civil rights leaders to use as BLACKMAIL [caps mine]. The man was just a nasty piece of work."

George Bush Sr. was worming his Nazi self into the CIA during Hoover's latter years. Together, they must have installed all sorts of nasties in high positions and lower. The lowers ones protected the higher ones, and the higher ones protected the lower ones. The lower ones hired more nasties lower down. I'm expected God to crack open this snake egg, show us the nasties.

Mrs. Teeter said that the man in front of us, not mentioning his name, has a wife with "big Texas hair." I can show that Biggs share the Hicks fleur-de-lys. Scottish Hairs are first known in Ayrshire with Blairs. The Texas surname shares the Shield of ChichESTERs (Devon again). Chicks are first known in Essex with Esters/Sturs and Biggs, and with Hicks' of Low Leighton. Leightons/Leytons were a LEGH/Leigh/Ley branch, to be presumed.

As soon as Mrs. Teeter told me about Kilpatrick's wife, I immediately thought that it could be Miss Hicks, whom I had seen, but not talked to, back in 1994, on the Leakey = Ranch road. At the time, Miss Hicks was in church, alone; I didn't know she was married. I began to wonder whether she is Sleeping Beauty in 1996. I didn't see her between 1995 and 2002.

The dream started with a BRITISH bullDOG with shark, suspect as Trump, and Trump lived and operated in New York. Dogs, Bush-like Bus', and Blair-connectable Billets (see Super billets) share the same cinquefoil. French Billets are also Billiards. SKATE's/Sheets share the Coat of Skits/Skeets (Ayrshire with Blairs) having a Skeoch variation looking like variations of Scoot-connectable Shoe's. The German Trips now showing shoes once showed boots, and the Air/Eyer leg is said to be wearing a "boot."

The dream with me in Obama's billiard hall (treated in last week's update) had Obama on a SKATEboard, celebrating. The dream was two weeks after Trump took Office in January, 2021, smack during the coup attempt now fingering Obama himself as per Gabbard revelations. I saw two Obama's, like when one sees double vision, on the skateboard. I thought it might represent the Twin surname, and so, perhaps, it's a pointer to the Twin Towers. The last two updates dealt with my shooting a paper AIRplane on Obama's billiard table, perhaps a pointer to faked planes for 9-11.

Obama had every ability to expose 9-11 as an inside job, along with Brennan at the CIA, and Comey at the FBI. They all promoted it as per Arabs and real planes that were not in fact used. Instead, explosives were placed in the buildings to give the impression of planes striking them. Made-for-public videos of planes striking the tower were fakes. There were no plane parts on the ground at the Pentagon, or in SHANKESville for Flight 93. Comey was in cahoots with Robert Mueller, and the latter was made the director of the FBI, by George Bush, a mere six days before 9-11. Bush clearly wanted Mueller to cover for the staged event.

I've just looked up Shankes' to find the BUS / Billet cinquefoil, and a "belled" hawk's leg. Billets share the Bellet Coat. I'll add that Blair-like Bloors (Staffordshire with Legg-connectable Hicksons) share the goat heads of Seagar-beloved Moline's (Devon with Supers and their Billet kin). Blair-connectable Bells are first known in Dumfries with Leggs, and Hawks are first known in Hampshire with Twins. The Shankes' could thus be pointing to so-called "war hawks," a phrase given life exactly by to George Bush's political circle. Shankes' have a "hawk's lure" while Lure's are first known in Ayrshire with Belairs/Blairs.

The wake scene was a sudden burst as soon as I touched her leg at the knee, and as both Leggs and Knee's get us to Tromps, the scene should be portraying some sudden exposure under the Trump administration, or some exposure in relation to him. The Mueller Report, from the staged Mueller probe, was all about unseating Trump from the White House.

Muellers share a black Catherine wheel with English Scotts, the latter first known in Kent with Sleeps who have the double Mule fesses in colors reversed. Thus, "scoot over" can relate to the wake scene, especially because Wake's almost have the Coat of Muller-like Mule's (Devon with Molsons and Moline's). The neighboring Mells even have a giant fret, symbol in different colors of Overs/Offers. Mells and Mails (Cheshire with Overs/Offers) were part of the pointers to "blackmail" in the last update. Beauty was in distress while hovering, afterwhich she fell asleep.

So, I think we can add the Mueller probe, which lasted for most of Trump's first term as a looming cloud over his head, in the hover scene. Yet it's Tulsi Gabbard who's exposing it, with perhaps more to come this week from the burn bags. Mueller wanted to hurt Trump due to his firing James Comey.

As she said, "YOU can scoot over," it could be telling that my mother's Masci line is in the fleur-de-lys of Irish Kilpatricks. Meschins are first known in Shropshire with the Bellamys sharing the Bell fesse, and I heard that Bellamys married Massys of Ferte-Mace.

Though not in the same design, Bellamys share a "scepter" in Crest with Seagars/Sickers (beside Batons), and both Kilpatrick saltires are in the Coat of Hunts/Hunters, first known in Shropshire with Bats who share the Kilpatrick / Hunter / BELLair/Blair saltire. The Bellamy scepter looks like an heraldic baton, and then English Batons share black bats with Bats and Scottish Randolphs, the latter first known in Moray with the Bellys who share the chevron of French Beils. The other French Beils share the Chief of French Batons.

"SECCURrere" is a motto term of Irish Diamonds/DIMONS while English Diamonds/Dinans are first known in Devon with Seagars/Sickers, Darts, and Monaco-branch Monks. Whitney Webb has shown why Jamie Dimon was put in charge of JP Morgan Chase (since 2006) as part of financially supporting Epstein's crimes. Grimaldi's of Monaco use a monk in their Arms, and it just so happens that both Diamond surnames share the lozenges of Grimaldi's and Bags. Dinens, with a reflection of Diamond/Dinan Coat, and with essentially the Dart Coat, have one of the double Sleep fesses-with-ermines.

An ermine mammal is in the Arms of St. Malo, some 15 miles from a Dinan location at the Ranch-like Rance river. It's also 15 miles from Dol so that the Dol whale can be a pointer to Wall Street. Rance's are listed with Rands/Rynds while Rinds share the Mallet scallops whole Malo's are listed with French Mallets. ,

I can't remember whether I dove into the pool to try to save the bulldog from the shark, versus jumping in, but in real life I'm not inclined to jumping in water in a situation like that. Dove's share a white dancetty-fesse with Dive's who in turn share a dancetty-fesse on red with Dinens, and Dine's/Dives' are first known in Surrey with James'. James Dimon. The dancetty-fesse of Dove's is in colors reversed with Wests (Devon with Dove-loving Page's). Dine's/Dives' love the Pattys and Wings, both first known in Worcestershire, and Pattys share the lion of Rance-like Raines' suspect from Rennes near the Rance river.

The 9-11 memorial was a few hundred feet from Ranch rd, and when I got up from sitting beside Mrs. Kilpatrick, to go to the stage, Stanley (I don't know his surname) sat beside her, holding the American flag, which he promptly took to the stage as part of the memorial. Stanleys share the Leak/Leakey bend, and have a "changer" motto term that I think points to "Loose Change," perhaps the first video production outlining how and why 9-11 was staged.

Change's/Changers, sharing the three fesses of Casino's, are first known in Hampshire with Chase's and Cassane's (share triple-Epstein chevrons). See that? Stanley is pointing to JP Morgan Chase bank, because it was related to Morgan Stanley bank. Hampshire is where Flys of Flagi are first known, and Stanley was holding the American flag. Chase's share the patonce cross of Change-like Chance's, and Flags are first known in Norfolk with Casey-connectable Case's. The eagle head of Irish Caseys is in colors reversed with Dutch Camps while German Camps (Westphalia with Hovers/Hoffers) essentially share the Dinen Coat.

So, if indeed I dove into the pool, it looks like a pointer to James Dimon, as if Wall Street / Council on Foreign Relations was behind the persecution of Trump, probably because he knew too much about too much, for he schmoozed with rich gangsters and classy low-lives of all types. He owned a half-dozen casinos, duh. Whalleys/Wallys share the Blair mascle.

The Dinat variation of Dinens can link to Donuts and their Denets/TENET branch, the latter first known in Sussex with Deins/Deans and Hams, where Dine's/Dives' were once said to be first known. Dinens list DynHAMs. To help prove a Dinat-Donut link, Donuts are first known in Norfolk with Rance's. The "proviDENTiam" motto term of Denets/Tenets, and the greyHOUND of Donuts, indicates that Dinens and Diamonds were branches of Dents (share Hound lozenges), first known in Yorkshire with Dent-like Dance's, tending to explain the dancetty-fesses we saw above, with Diens/Dinats and Dive's' (Cambridgeshire with Hounds).

Dents, sharing motto terms in the Arms of Rothschild, are first known in SEDbergh, and Seeds/Seats love the Blair- / Beller-connectable Steers, first known in Surrey with Dives'/Dine's. English Rothes' are first known in Kent with Dinen-connectable Sleeps, both once said to be first known in Shropshire with Alans of Dol. Although I can't see a Hover link to German Camps, I think the Dinen/Dinat fesse links Mr. Diamond to Beauty's Sleep and hover scene. Sleeps are first known in Kent with the British's/BRODicks and Gards, and the latter have the Gardner, Camp/Comp, and Brother/BRODer griffin heads in colors reversed.

The vertically-split Shield colors of Brothers/Broders (Oxfordshire with Gardners) is shared with Bellers (Cambridgeshire with Dive's and Hounds), and is in colors reversed with Steers. Steers were loved by German Backs/Bachs while Welsh Backs/Baghs have a black dog in Crest to go with the black greyhound on the Brother/Broder Crest. Half the Beller lion is with Garden-branch English Jarrets, first known on Shropshire with a Sleap location, and with Blair-connectable Hunts/Hunters and Bats. French Jarrets, sharing the Garden/Jarden Coat, are first known in Dol, some 15 miles from Dinan.

Shropshire is also where Bedins/Beddows are first known who share the boar head of Jardens and Jarrets. Yet the Bedins/Beddows, aside from their boar heads, have the SEGUR Coat while Seagars/Sickers (Devon with Blair-connectable Supers), linkable to both Blairs and Kilpatricks, are first known in Devon with Diamonds/Dinans.

I originally found the Bedin variation of Beddows when Mamie and I were at home plate of a baseball diamond, as part of a Bible-study outing we were on. I had given her a Bible, but she said she left it under a BED while away on a trip. Bedins were looked up as per HUMa ABEDIN, because the pastor's daughter, who was at SECOND base at the time Mamie and I were at home plate, pointed to pedophilia (not going to go back into that here). Seconds are listed with Bedin-connectable Segurs.

I've told of Mamie's thigh symbol at her front garden that pointed to Tease's/Tyes'/Tighs. Thigh's/Thy's share the HEIMer fox. Mamie and I first kissed at a CAMP site, and Camps/Comps share the Gardner griffin heads. Hours after the kiss, she got her thigh symbol at her garden, where she probably held a water hose, for Hose's, first known in Leicestershire with Kiss'/Cush's, use legs.

We woke that day in the same TENT (no sex), where she teased me the night before. TENETs are listed with Denets. The thigh is part of a leg, and Leggs have a "TENTamine" motto term. Mame's are listed with Mens' while Mine's list Menne's. TentaMINE. It just so happens that Mine's/Menne's show only a dancetty-fesse...with the Liss/Lise pale bars within them, and while Scottish Lise's are first known in Dumfries with Leggs, Liss'/Lise's are first known in Hampshire with the Mamesfelde location of Manfields. The latter are in the format of tent-using Tintons. The Jungs suspect in the Garden/Jarden and Case mottoes have a giant stag in colors of the giant Legg / Trump stag head.

I remember setting up the SLEEPING BAG, in the tent, with Mamie. She wouldn't even give me a hug when we got in. We didn't talk, we just went to sleep. I was a thriving 24-year old. It must have been a crime scene in there. It was like a burn bag. What FBI spy was in that bag with us? Tease's/Tess', who happen to be first known in Switzerland with Berns, have the saltire of Garden-branch Jardins (Angus with Gardens/Jardens) in colors reversed. The Bern Bag.

Tess-like Tass', I kid you not, share the scallop of Patel-like Pattle's of PATTIshall. Kiss'/Cush's share the CASH/Cass Coat. Kash Patel must have been in that bag with us. I soon-after bought Mamie a Bible, and Bible's/Bibo's have a rooster on a CUSHion, and share the red rooster with Kiss'/CUSH's. Bible's/Bibo's are said to have shared the rooster on a cushion with Trump-connectable Hahns. German Hanns (rooster in Tromp-eagle colors and format) have a red rooster in Crest.

The next day, SUNday, we kissed for the first time in the lake, and Lake's are first known in Oxfordshire with Gardners and Brothers/Broders while British's/Brodicks (same place as Sleeps) share the red fox with Thigh's/Thys. "Thy WORK" is a motto phrase of Sinclairs/SUNs, first known in Midlothian with Mame's/Mens. Sundays/Sandys (WORCestershire with Dine/Dives kin) have another dancetty-fesse in the colors of the Dance fesse, and colors reversed from the dancetty Dive fesse. So far as I can remember, I didn't do a dive in the lake. We were only wading. But then I don't remember one thing after our lake kiss until we were at the front garden of her home.

What is Mamie in the tent telling us, that Kash Patel's burn bags are just another tease job, a token offering for making a "good show" of his work? Will Trump tell him to lay off of deeper exposures of the things in the bags?

It's important to repeat that Mamie has extra-large breasts, for "mam" speaks to breasts. I'm repeating this because Brest of Brittany, near Launay, traces to Italian Lane's, first known in Brixia/Brescia, beside Val TROMPia, itself beside lake GARDa. Brests/Brix's look related to the Coat of Dols, first known in Mecklenburg with Trumps and Hahns. "Garde" is a Lane/Lawn motto term. The Tromp acorn is with French MAURels/Morels, first known in Brittany with Brest and Launay, and while president Trump is thought to descent from Drumpfs, Drummonds started out from MAURice Drummond.

German Drummonds are first known in Hamburg with German Trips, and English Trips share the "scaling ladder" with Maurice-connectable Morris', and with Bennets sharing a "roy" motto term with Lane's/Lawns.

The only reason she and I were in the tent to begin with is that she came to sit, for lack of somewhere to sit, on my LAP when the gang (my friends before I became a Christian) was sitting around the camp fire. I didn't invite her onto my lap. I don't remember talking to her earlier that day. The only reason I was there at the camp site is that Barry coaxed me to come along. Laps/LABBS', first known in Wiltshire with trumpet-using Calls, can be in the "labi" motto term of French Maurels/Morels.

Note how "Morel" is like "Morley," for David Morley RODE a circle around a sleeping bag, now suspect as a Rhodian-circle crime from the Clintons. The bag was on a hill, and Morley came from a ROAD. As Hills are first known in Worcestershire with Hillarys and the Clent hills, Morley is a pointer to Hillary RODham Clinton. Her husband is a Rhodian Scholar, globalist tool. What sort of money laundering was he doing with Epstein and/or Dimon? Hillary Clinton once said that the Council on Foreign Relations was like her boss, as if it was a good thing for America.

It turns out that the burn bags have the "Annex" of John Durham's investigation into Robert Mueller / Christopher Steele, et-al. Chuck Grassley is being tapped to expose this story, interesting where Grasleys share the Coat of Becker-branch Beach's/Bechs while Baggers are in the colors and format of Bernie's/Barnys and Biks/Bikers. The latter are pointed to by Morley's motorbike around the sleeping bag. German Beckers share the bend-with-checks of Steele's.

Big Bang Ball Not to Be Seen

After an explosion, there's going to be no exploded material between the point-of-explosion and the exploded material. No matter how long the goofs think the big-bang explosion kept on exploding or spewing forth cosmic material, there needs to be a time then it ceases to do so, unless they think it's still going on. As soon as the big bang stopped exploding material, the gap of empty space between the explosion point and the exploded material will of course grow ever larger with time, like a ball's skin growing ever larger, and nothing between the shell and the explosion point at the center of the ball.

But nobody has ever reported a universe or body of stars having a shape like the skin of a sphere. That alone makes the big-bang theory fail, and the fact that the evolutionist goons don't tell this to you is your first sign that they are dishonest fools. The universe doesn't show any signs of being merely a shell. The longer the explosion takes, the thicker the shell should be of the universe.

The big-bangers hope you to be their fool by talking mish-mash, denying that the big bang was an explosion. But of course it was, don't give us that hogwash. That is, the way in which the big bag is described can only be viewed as an explosion. google AI is programmed to say:

The "Big Bang" was not an explosion that had a duration in the traditional sense; instead, it's described as the rapid expansion of space itself from an incredibly hot and dense state. The very earliest, highly energetic and rapidly expanding phase, known as cosmic inflation, lasted for only a fraction of a second, approximately 10^-32 of a second, according to Alan Guth's theory.

What a bunch of lousy magicians. It wasn't an explosion, it was an "expansion" from central force over a very-short time. Ya-but, idiots, that's an explosion. The goons realize the problem in a universe caused by an explosion, and so they want your mind to be as lunatic as theirs by imagining a non-explosive expansion of materials. How does that happen? It can't even be imagined. They want you to envision an impossible situation in which materials expanded from a central point, but where there has always been material FULLY between the big-bang point and the outer stars. They want you to think that the big-bang explosion formed a solid ball, not merely the skin of a ball. See their problem?

When searching "shape of the universe, solid ball or empty ball," google AI responds with what the goons have told the world, a bunch of fine-sounding mish-mash that makes no sense, all intended to somehow explain away why the universe's shape doesn't look like the skin of a ball: "The shape of the universe is not a simple "solid ball" or "empty ball," but rather [here comes the mish-mash] a matter of its overall geometry and curvature [lunatic confusion], which current evidence suggests is very close to flat [HAHAHAHA]. While the observable universe appears as a roughly spherical region around us, this is due to the limitations of how far light has traveled since the Big Bang, not necessarily the global shape of the entire universe."

Go ahead, be a lunatic, envision a flat universe from a big-bang explosion, trust your lunatic masters whose only motive and purpose is to do away with a Creator. The universe cannot have curvature. Only a lunatic marries space with curvature, or space with time. There is no such thing as time aside from a concept in the human mind. There is no time material, no time stuff. It's not there, anywhere.

There is no such thing as speed. It's a concept in the mind only. It describes how fast a thing takes to get from A to B. But there is no speed material. Time describes how long it takes between event A and B, but, other than that, it doesn't exist. You can't join it to space, especially as space does not exist. There is no space material, goofballs. They want you to think that space was created, what a bunch of cursed lunatics. Throw the bums out. Space is defined as nothingness. There is no nothingness. It's just a concept in the mind, the absence of materials. Space does exist, but it doesn't exist because it's not made of anything. It's everywhere, but it's not a thing. Time doesn't exist just because the hands on a clock go round. There is time, in our minds, but it's not a thing.

In my last update, I explained why all gas atoms repel each other, which destroys the big-bang theory of star formation, which is why evolutionists created another way to explain gas pressure aside from gas atoms repelling each other electromagnetically. The goons won't tell you why they created the kinetic-atom theory of gas pressure, because they don't want to look like their "science" is merely self-serving when serving their big-bang theory. What the goofs want us to believe is that gas atoms have the ability to attract each other into proto-stars, and, over time, to attract enough atomic material to form full-blown stars. It's that simple.

Therefore, their big-bang needs is what formed their body of atomic physics, whether the physics was erroneous or not. As they can't prove that gas atoms attract each other, they assigned them an IOTA of gravity force each, so weak that nobody can cause a dense atomic material (e.g. piece of metal) to attract another dense material no matter how close they are to each other. It's this weak because it doesn't exist. Face the facts. Gravity does not reside in atoms. But if not, the big bang becomes dead. It's that simple.

So long as they can convince their partners in big-bang crime that an iota of gravity force, per atom, exists, they can go lunatic with the imaginary formation of gravity pools in space, the proto-stars. Somehow, atoms started to gather in space to form gravity pools, and for this they needed gas atoms to attract. But wait. Creation science, which is supposed to be the quest of truth, is not something in the imagination only, but needs to logical. If every batch of gas atoms now on earth want to get away from each other, how is it logical to imagine a pool of atoms coming together in the big-bang cosmos? It's impossible, unless it occurs in the imagination.

Anyone who teaches what is contrary to known laws of physics is to be regarded as a dangerous fool, a lunatic. I'm not exaggerating when describing cosmic evolutionists as demented lunatics on a mission. They are working to spoil the potential salvation of those they teach. They want your children to go to Hell with them.

There was some considerable time between Darwin and Einstein, enough to cause budding evolutionists of the atheistic kind to ponder the evolution of the cosmos. The big bang theory could have been floating around inner circles of cosmology decades before the official announcement, by a Vaticanite, during Einstein's time:

Georges Henri Joseph Edouard Lemaitre...who made major contributions to cosmology and astrophysics. He was the first to argue that the recession of galaxies is evidence of an expanding universe and to connect the observational Hubble–Lemaitre law with the solution to the Einstein field equations in the general theory of relativity for a homogenous and isotropic universe (Wikipedia).

The latter sentence is mere blah-blah. No theory of the creation of the universe necessarily needs Relativity, unless some lunatic extends relativity in some lunatic way to a process of creation. Stick to the basics, guard yourself from becoming their lunatic. Wikipedia:

General relativity, also known as the general theory of relativity, and as Einstein's theory of gravity, is the geometric theory of gravitation published by Albert Einstein in 1915 and is the currently accepted description of gravitation in modern physics. General relativity generalizes special relativity and refines Newton's law of universal gravitation, providing a unified description of gravity as a geometric property of space and time, or four-dimensional spacetime. In particular, the curvature of spacetime [HAHAHAHA, the fool advertises himself as a fool] is directly related to the energy,...

The Wikipedia writer says "four-dimensional spacetime" with a straight face, the most dangerous king of lunatic. Can you really imagine curved spacetime? I won't even try, just not "smart" enough to see it.

There are people to this day pushing a gravity definition that doesn't require the normal definition of naked attraction. By "naked," I mean it's not dressed up with fancy or complication. Mere attraction. That's what gravity is, obviously. But that kind of gravity was problematic to the big-bang theory, because gas atoms don't attract each other. Therefore, some lunatic definition of gravity was needed, and there were those willing to give this monster a birth, followed with nurture.

I don't say "simple attraction" because nobody can explain how attraction works. It's possibly the most mysterious mystery, not simple to explain. How can there be attraction between protons and electrons? Inexplicable. How could a non-intelligent big-bang explosion create that attraction? Cosmic evolutionists, seeking to create the universe without a Creator, have made the biggest laughing stocks of themselves.

When I ask google, "is there a God," google arranges AI not to answer the question. Because, if google allows AI to answer the question as atheists would like it, then everyone would see more clearly that AI is not artificial intelligence, but rather is just a batch of data programmed to be used in certain, controlled ways. The person who says there's no evidence of God's existence is in chronic denial, and big-bang evolution was devised to assist such people, to make the obvious evidence for a Creator appear foggy, uncertain, due to a floated second theory on creation without need for Him. The leading evolutionists will of course not openly admit that this is the motive of their establishment. The purpose of the theory of relativity-gravity is to bring people, and abandon them, to a mental dead-end where they cannot resolve anything. The idea seems to be to keep an alternative theory of gravity alive even though nobody can understand it or logically explain it. It's lunacy, pure and "simple."

One should be able to instantly glean that Einstein was placing himself into a lunatic sphere right from the outset of his quest to re-define gravity. From Wikipedia's article above:

Einstein started thinking about how to incorporate gravity into his relativistic framework. In 1907, beginning with a simple thought experiment involving an observer in free fall (FFO), he embarked on what would be an eight-year search for a relativistic theory of gravity. After numerous detours and false starts, his work culminated in the presentation to the Prussian Academy of Science in November 1915 of what are now known as the Einstein field equations, which form the core of Einstein's general theory of relativity. These equations specify how the geometry of space and time is influenced by whatever matter and radiation are present.

When you read, "the geometry of space and time," you have your bright, red flag with "LUNATIC" written in bright yellow. What in tarnation could the "geometry of space," which itself looks like a monster, have to do with objects falling to gravity? And if you don't know that "geometry of time" doesn't exist, you are in danger already of falling into Einsteinian lunacy. Einstein seems to have been stoned on LSD while concocting this trash. The same article wants the reader to go to another gravity definition, but doesn't tell the reader that the motive is to keep naked gravity from spoiling big-bang mechanics:

During that period, general relativity remained something of a curiosity among physical theories. It was clearly superior to Newtonian gravity, being consistent with special relativity and accounting for several effects unexplained by the Newtonian theory.

See that? Better than naked gravity. They were dressing gravity in a beautiful robe with stars in its long tail. Einsteinian gravity became the new bride to take the heat off the impossibility of the big-bang. When Hubble announced that the universe was expanding, it was likely a pre-determined need for the invention of the big-bang. Hubble did not in fact prove the big bang because: ...most galaxies are moving away from Earth...While the vast majority are moving away, a few nearby galaxies, like Andromeda, are gravitationally bound and moving towards us (google AI).

The first problem with this picture is that it makes the earth look like it's at the center of the big-bang universe, and the second problem is that exactly zero galaxies should be moving toward the big-bang point. The goofs have some splaining to do, but they have no good splain.

The fact is, stars are all negatively charged, and as such they have the built-in power to repel each other such that the universe can expand into larger size for that reason alone. google AI informs us that most goofs see stars as net-positive: "No, the Sun is not negatively charged; it is generally considered to have a net positive electric charge...result[ing] from electrons, being much lighter and having a lower escape velocity than protons, being more easily ejected from the Sun than protons, leading to a slight excess of positive charge." They are in denial.

As protons have much-less mass, they are going to be sent away from the sun faster than any theoretical protons in the solar wind. You can hit a baseball much further with a bat swing than a cannon ball, and so these goofs will need to fess up: the big bang would have sent electrons flying much faster and further than much-heavier protons, in which case, if the big-bang was only a momentary event, the electrons would not have ended up in the same cosmic space as the protons. How would atoms form in a scenario where electrons are batted into deep field while protons barely reach the pitcher's mound?

What they have not yet come to admit, because it ruins their big-bang theory if they admit it, is that stars emit electrons due to the net-negative charge in all stars. It's just so simple: the free electrons in stars repel each other into space, but in order for stars to have an abundance of free electrons, their protons need to be crippled of positive charge. Instead of holding up this viable view as even a good and logical option, they dread to present it, and chose to see both solar protons and electrons flying off to space due to achieving escape velocity.

Well, if protons and electrons can achieve escape velocity from merely explosions in one star, how much faster were protons and electrons flying when they exploded forth from the big bang? How could particles that fast deviate in direction? How could particles that fast ever come together to form atoms, since outward flight from a point causes all particles to move continually further apart? There can be no splaining here. The theory is dead aside from wild imaginings that break the known laws.

The Creator placed stars into position at the moment of creation. From that point on, all stars began to repel each other, slowly moving away from each at first, but progressively faster because constant repulsion force held to each other causes acceleration of motion. Generally, all stars can be predicted to move away from the center of their body, the center of the universe, and yet we can also predict that, in some cases, stars can be repelled toward the center, or partially toward the center, due to a bunch (cluster) of stars acting collectively to toward a neighboring star, progressively slowing the latter's outward direction and eventually reversing the direction.

The reason the goofs claim that protons cannot be destroyed is that they want to argue that the big-bang explosion didn't destroy them. The goofs thus have at least two reasons not to take the view that stars become net-negative by destruction of protons, not reasons due to the science, but because the survival of their big-bang demands it. And the reason they don't want a hard, big-bang EXPLOSION is in order that students of big-bang pushers might better grasp how protons survived it. Therefore, they want a soft explosion, a gentle expansion, what a bunch of self-serving "scientists." Nothing on the order of all the material in the universe can be deemed a "soft" explosion if indeed it all originated from a point in a split second.

Soccer balls curve in the air due to interaction with the air, but unless the goofs invent an "air" pore-existing in the universe, big-bang materials, protons and electrons, would fly in straight lines, and therefore progressively further apart. Besides, only a lunatic would think they could get away with convincing the public that all the material in the universe was "inside" of a small point. The laughable thing is, the world is full of lunatic students, so hateful of God that they would take this theory seriously enough to support it.

There is no inside to a small point. A point does not exist. It's another concept existing in the mind alone. There is no point material. A point is a location. The point once had no material, then suddenly the entire universe comes out of this point. LAUGHABLE LUNATICS. The lunatic might imagine that the point was a door from another universe, and, like pus squirting out of a pimple, the whole universe squirted though the point. No matter how you cut it, there was a universe inside the point, according to big bangers. HAHAHAHA.

Goofs Prefer Magical Ghosts to Normal Waves

Like I said, the last thing the goofs want is to so much as suggest that the solar-wind electrons are the light-wave aether. I've asked google, "why can't the solar wind be the aether?" The response:

The solar wind cannot be the aether because the luminiferous aether hypothesis was a discarded concept in physics, while the solar wind is a well-observed and characterized phenomenon.

There you see that the question was not answered properly. The aether is merely swept aside as false, but no reason is given as to why the solar wind cannot act as the aether. There is no reason whatsoever that light waves cannot transfer through the solar wind if light waves are caused by the commotion of free electrons in the sun. Every commotion in air or water forms waves. Why not also the commotion of solar electrons through the solar-wind electrons?

I asked google, "can light waves transfer through the solar wind?" The answer is as if AI doesn't understand the question, and moreover AI apes its masters by implying that photons are waves, which is impossible: "Yes, light waves can travel through the solar wind, and in fact, they do so constantly." How stupid do they need to be to be wrong on so many aspects of these topics? The goofs don't view light waves as moving through space thanks only to the existence of the solar-wind electrons, but as waves in addition, and separate from, solar-wind electrons. The goofs then invent light "waves" from their imaginary photon, lest they look like goofs by doing away with the photon after claiming it as fact for so long. They therefore chose to make bigger fools of themselves by claiming a photon particle to be a moving wave, which is ridiculous.

I can prove to you that sunlight cannot be a photon, if only you would stick to logic. Photons get blocked by many materials as thick as a hair, and yet the solar wind material between the sun and earth amounts to much more material. There is no way that straight-shooting photons could avoid colliding with solar-wind electrons, to be deflected away such that we should not be able to see the sun as crisply round as it can be seen.

Another problem is that, when you ask the goofs to explain how their miraculous, incomprehensible, illogical "electromagnetic waves" get through the solar wind, they simply expect you to believe that they have things all correctly understood. When I ask google whether light waves can "propagate" or "transfer" through the solar wind, it again pretends it doesn't know what I'm asking, but mocks me by saying, "Yes, light waves can propagate through the solar wind because the solar wind is a plasma and does not prevent electromagnetic radiation from traveling through it." The scientists are lying to us, the solar wind is NOT a plasma just because it originates at solar plasma. It's feeding you a line and expecting you to imagine something magical about plasma that permits an alternative or foreign material to pass through solar-wind material virtually unscathed.

I doubt very much that we're going to get a logical explanation as to why photon-waves can get through a material just because it's deemed a plasma. This is all smoke-and-mirrors to prevent goofball scientists and general people from realizing that light cannot be a straight-shooting object. They have their fellow scientist activists proudly bewitched with nonsense.

The only way for light to "get through" the solar wind is when light is defined as the motion of the solar-wind particles. When electrons released from solar protons shoots out at the first-solar-wind electron in their path, there's a bump of motion transferred to the latter, and it then bumps the next electron in the same direction, and so on. That is the true definition of light, a wave through the solar wind, not a material through the solar wind. Just motion, no second entity needed such as photons.

Don't be deceived, their "electromagnetic waves" are not waves at all. The goofs draw them on paper to look like waves, to fool you, but this is smoke-and-mirror trash. My question to google is, why can't sunlight be a true wave through the solar wind? But it mocks me by shifting to electromagnetic waves inexplicably passing by solar-wind particles unscathed.

When asking google, "why can light waves propagate through magma,"" it again doesn't answer the question but to be sly in saying that light can travel through materials. Ya-but, not many materials, and so the question is, why can light travel through magma particles, but google does not address that crux of my question. It says:

Light waves, which are electromagnetic waves, can propagate through magma because they do not require a medium and can travel through both vacuums and matter. While the magma slows down light due to absorption and re-emission processes by its atoms, it does not completely block it.

You can see in the second sentence that scientists want us to think that photons strike solar-wind protons and electrons, but, fully expected, they say that, instead of being deflected chaotically by the collisions, such that straight-line light is ruined, they claim that the photons get absorbed by the particles, then re-emitted in the same direction as they came when absorbed. That is called, NONSENSE when light is defined as a particle. That is called, MAGIC, when light is defined as a particle. That is smoke and mirrors.

The reality is that light is in fact absorbed by atoms, and that light can emit out of those atoms in the same direction as when striking the atoms, but the solar wind is not made of atoms. As "plasma" is defined as atoms, then the solar wind is not a plasma. The question therefore still is: how do photons, foreign to solar-wind electrons and protons, get past them? How can a light particle get absorbed by a naked proton or a lone electron except by some cartoon picture in our heads where anything magical or unexpected goes on?

STUPID GOOFS, it's not the light wave -- the cartoon wave, the photon THING, the photon MATERIAL -- that gets absorbed in collisions by solar-wind particles, but rather it's the energy of the MOVING solar-wind electrons that gets absorbed and passed on. A material particle does not get absorbed by another material particle like a ghost living in someone's body. Only motion energy of a particle gets absorbed, into whatever material it collides with...and the energy naturally wants to pass of out the material to move on in a straight line. That is a true wave.

The only way light waves can get absorbed and emitted unscathed by transparent gas atoms is by transferring across the captured electrons of those atoms, but naked protons have no such atmospheres. Therefore, photon particles cannot get past the many protons that the goofs imagine to be in the solar wind. It's very convenient for the bums to define the photon as a straight-shooting material particle when it works for their science, then turn it into some ghostly wave when needed to explain why light propagation behaves as wave propagation.

IT IS ABSOLUTELY REQUIRED that light be a wave in order to get through the solar wind. It is absolutely required that light waves get absorbed by solar-wind particles. But the wave is not a foreign photon passing THROUGH solar-wind particles like a ghost passing through solid walls. See that? Can you see how idiotic they are, these goofs, who insist in denying that the solar wind is the light-wave MEDIUM, the aether? They need to be tarred and feathered by the public for peddling mind-bending crap.

One needs to fool with google like trying to pull teeth. I've had to re-arrange my questions slightly to get it to make a fool of itself. I asked:: "how does light propagate through solar wind protons?" It indeed made a fool of itself for lack of a proper answer:

Light, which travels at the speed of light, is not significantly affected by solar wind protons because it moves so much faster than the protons and is not electrically charged. The solar wind is a stream of charged particles, predominantly protons and electrons, that emanates from the Sun's corona. While the solar wind particles interact with each other and with magnetic fields, light's propagation is unimpeded by these charged particles.

Say what? Light gets past protons just because light is much faster than solar-wind protons? That's not an answer anyone can understand? Try convincing us that a supersonic jet gets past a boy on his tricycle, leaving the boy and bike unscathed, just because the jet is faster. FOOL JOB. AI is programmed to offer fool jobs to the public.

The same response makes some elaboration, but not much: "Light does not interact with the solar wind protons in a way that would alter its path or speed..." Ya-but, tell us why. The photon is the wee boy on his trike, moving as fast as a supersonic jet, and crashing into a giant jet rolling on its wheels slowly on the runway. Are we are supposed to believe that the boy flies right through the jet unscathed instead of getting both squashed and deflected by it? Are you kidding me? That's why the goofs don't use "photon" in this case, but instead switch to "electromagnetic wave." They have options in their magic bag.

Why not scrap the photon altogether and switch to normal waves through the solar-wind particles? Because, peddlers in youth tonic don't want to admit they abused their customers. Jail the bums.

The solar wind exists in a laboratory vacuum, what is it that the bums can't understand about this? The solar wind crashes into the earth, fills the air, and if you take the air atoms out of a sealed container, the solar-wind electrons that get removed by the pump are replaced by electrons that weasel past the seal of the pump, but also by the air's electrons that creep into the container through the atomic spaces of the container. The only way to get all the electrons out of a vacuum is to make it much-much colder outside of the container. The electrons within push each other out through the container walls, when its colder outside. But when the temperatures on both sides are equal, the inner electrons will cease to push out.

The fact that space is cold above the earth's atmosphere is due to the low density of solar-wind electrons, for election density is the definition of "temperature." The solar-wind electrons are super dense at the sun's atmosphere, but spread out with distance from the sun for obvious reason (there's increasing volume of space with increasing distance from the sun). However, there are some very hot spots in the upper atmosphere of the earth, and those regions can only be where solar electrons are deflected and concentrated by air atoms. Yes, of course, some solar-wind electrons get deflected when colliding into air atoms, because they are not ghosts. The solar wind is like a flow of water that gets deflected around the upper atmosphere. The "water" coming in from behind forces the "water" in contact with the atmosphere to move both into and around the atmosphere, same as when flood waters flowing down an open field hit a small patch of thick trees such that water goes into the forest, but with some swell going around the forest edges due to the restriction to flow offered by the trees.

The hot spots in the upper atmosphere are solar-wind swells. It's likely that the Van-Allen belts are directly above these swells, for earth gravity repels the electrons of the swells further into space.

It should be clear that the goofballs goof when claiming that solar-wind electrons don't enter into the air. HAHAHAHA. They invented a magical bogeyman inside the forest holding a big magnet that keeps the flood waters from entering the trees. HAHAHAHA. The yoke is on the better scientists to debunk the bag of magic tricks. REBEL TODAY, be a good guy, save the people from the madness.

Why did they invent the bogeyman magnet? What would be so awful with an admission that solar-wind electrons enter the air? What frightens them so much about that picture? People might get the idea that electrons define heat, so scary. Electrons going in and out of materials defining temperature changes, so scary.

Plus, with solar-wind electrons filling the atmosphere, one can trash the electromagnetic-wave bogeyman, and espouse true light waves though the aether. But if the goons can convince us that the magnet bogeyman keeps solar-wind electrons out of the air, then there's no possibility to define light as a true wave in the solar-wind light medium. That's how the peddlers roll, with invention after invention, like the devil on your back with hands on your eyes.

Surely, if the magnet bogeyman drives all solar-wind particles around the earth such as to make them more concentrated to the side of the planet, then, surely, those naked protons would be dressing back up as full-blown hydrogen atoms unavoidably. Surely, a massive percentage of protons would come near enough to electrons to mate with them across a distance of thousands of miles in the traffic jam above the atmosphere? Where's proof of the hydrogen up there?

Just think of how dense the solar-wind is at the starting line, at the sun. How possibly could there be naked protons there, with so many free electrons in their midst. If the goof tries to convince you that the protons are too energetic, or something, to grab and hold electrons, then how do hydrogen atoms exist further down in the sun, where the action is more wild, more energetic? The sickos are sick. They found free electrons in the solar wind, and by nature of the devil on their backs, they announced falsely, like sickos who refuse to be healthy, that each solar-wind electron has one proton counterpart. And the announcement was turned into a basic fact of astronomy that you are not allowed to counter lest you be brutally raped of scientific respect.

The power of the sun MUST UNAVOIDABLY create waves through the solar wind whether its make-up is regarded as electrons or protons, for protons repel protons, and electrons repel electrons, meaning that any motion energy sent into either the protons or electrons will "carry" particle-to-particle, due to their being in contact via their repulsion forces.

One can calculate how many electron diameters apart the electrons will be when they reach earth by assuming logically that, at some point above the solar surface, the electrons are basically in physical contact with each other. As the volume of space increased by eight times for every doubling of distance from the sun, one starts on the certain premise that electrons are in contact when they are at a distance of one solar radius from the center of the sun.

Electrons in physical contact are to be regarded as one electron diameter apart, electron center to electron center. When electrons sailing away from the sun reach two solar radii from the solar core, they will be eight times less dense. I have calculated reliably that any particles eight times less dense are exactly two times further apart. This makes the math very simple: electrons are as much further apart, center to center, as they are solar radii from the sun. For example, when they are ten solar radii from the sun, they are ten times further apart, and therefore ten electron diameters further apart.

Although NASA eclipse data assures that the sun is not 93 million miles away, but more like 15 million (18 million tops), we can use their distance figure for the math; it doesn't change the electron-spacing outcome because, the closer the sun really is, the smaller it will be proportionately, and thus the solar radius will be smaller too, proportionately. Lunar-eclipse data is such that, the closer the sun, the smaller it must be accordingly.

They say the solar radius is 432,700 miles. If we divide 93 million by that figure, we find 215 solar radii between earth and sun. Therefore, no matter how far the sun really is, electrons are 215 electron diameters apart as they sail by the earth. That sounds very cold to me. If you imagine one-inch marbles, they are 215 inches = 18 feet away from each other.

The repulsion forces between one-inch electrons 18 feet apart will be very minute, but as motion energy cannot be destroyed, it will carry across these electrons so long as they all "feel" their mutual repulsion forces. We can't argue against their being in repulsion-contact, be it ever so minute, because the sun's gravity upon the earth, or the earth's upon the moon, is very minute too, yet it's enough to keep stable orbits.

However, as they collide with "giant" air atoms, the electrons slow drastically and thus accumulate, reducing the distances between each other by more than significant amounts. God had to manage the situation, to make the air density just-so as to form a just-so temperature from solar electrons, and this management included the decision on how far to place the sun, how big it should be to release just-so many electrons, and how tall the atmosphere should be, which required an earth gravity with just-so force. The fool says in his heart that the big bang did it all.

I should add that, as electrons repel each other during their trip from sun to earth, they are expected to be more than 215 electron diameters apart upon arrival.

The solar electrons are moreover responsible for the creation of atmospheric wind to distribute the heat far and wide. No solar electrons, no wind, it's as simple as that. Wind is due to differing densities of pockets of atmospheric electrons. The pockets with higher densities naturally flow into pockets of lower densities, and they push air atoms along in the process. It's only after electrons push air atoms along that the air-atom densities start to change such that low- and high-density air itself causes wind. Just like electrons, air atoms seek to move away from each other, and they therefore naturally move where the density is lower.

But if heat were due to the collisions of photons with air atoms, then we are hard-pressed to see how these "ghosts" that pass through air atoms could possibly grant air atoms any motion energy by which the atoms can become hotter. The goofs want it both ways, with photons going through atoms without colliding into the brick walls called, protons, and yet they also want photons to make air atoms faster thanks to colliding with them. Which is it, goofballs? If photons collide into atoms such as to speed them up, then the photons are required to bounce away. But, alas, I'm unwilling to believe that photons have the magic qualities assigned to them by the inventors of madness.

They then tell us that photons have almost zero mass, because it plays well with the fact that light waves can't move even a piece of small dust. Yet these same photons drastically increase the temperature of the air such as to make air atoms fly a thousand miles per hour faster than they are imagined to be flying around at the top of the atmosphere. When someone gives birth to phantoms of the imagination, expect contradictions in the real world.

The less mass they assign a photon, the bigger the bounce-away when it collides with much-larger electrons or protons. Plus, the goofs claim that photons never lose speed even though they collide with atoms head-on at times. It's like a never-ending train of stupidities. Sooner or later, they're going to run out of magic potion. Sooner or later, they need to be jailed. And God will jail them, make no mistake. Unless they repent, they will be jailed in a black hole with all of their buddies.

The cursed decided to make light the operation of orbiting electrons. They decided that photons piggy-back on electrons because they saw that light originates with electrons. As they fell in love with photons that never lose or change speed (because this conveniently granted them the exact age of the big-bang universe, or so they believe), they needed to make electrons orbit at nearly the speed of light around protons. HAHAHAHA. Otherwise, if a stationary electron grabs a photon in order to re-emit it as light, the photon would go from light speed to exactly zero miles per hour for the whole time that it's on the electron, and then everyone's going to scratch their heads wondering how the photon goes back up to light speed once the electron spits it out.

As you can see, one madness became another, endlessly in efforts to repair the damages. Instead of the speedy photon becoming mangled as it cleanly pierces the defenseless electron in a head-on crash, they believe that the electron momentarily picks the photon up only to spit it out again. They may as well view this situation as a pure deflection of in-coming photons, yet the deflections will undoubtedly occur from every possibly angle, including head-on collisions (not predicted to send electrons into higher orbits) where the force of impact is roughly the force at twice the speed of light. The photon magically bounces off at the same speed it arrives, no matter the angle of impact, only because the educators are law-breaking wingnuts. Laugh at them along with me, it's liberating.

In the same way that air atoms would remain perfectly still (locked by inter-repulsion at equa-distance), without solar electrons colliding into them, so the electron atmosphere around protons are perfectly still until light waves collide with it. The light-wave collision with puts the electron atmosphere into commotion, and so the captured electrons send out light waves just as solar electrons do in the sun due to their commotion there. Commotion of electrons is the beginning of light.

If you tap your finger against some desk atoms at 5 miles per hour, the atoms are vibrated enough to send sound waves to your ears. Yet we are to believe that photons travelling at 670 million mph create no sound waves at all when striking any sort of material. This is just another of the countless madness-monsters requiring at least one more senseless entanglement in efforts to explain why it's not madness. These Lords of Mud claim that the atoms in your desk are vibrating at many hundreds of miles per hour, HAHAHAHA, yet the atoms make no noise.

If they were really vibrating that fast, the noise would kill you. Imagine every object in the world making noise from atomic rattlings. Be sane. God made atoms to be still unless someone/something moves them. If water atoms were ALL vibrating at hundreds of miles per hour, that energy would show on the liquid surface as water in motion. That's because the energy needs to go somewhere, and the path of least resistance is out the water surface. Get sane today, and throw the bums out. If you merely stir a straw at 5 mph in water and remove the straw, you can see some remnant motion at the water surface, yet that straw does not contact all the atoms in the water. The water quickly returns to motionlessness, because all the atoms of all liquids are bound in inter-attraction forces.

Attraction forces between objects do not allow motion. Attraction force is constantly applied wherever it exists, no coffee breaks at all, and it constantly slows any motion to dead stillness of whatever it attracts. Be sane today. Sign up with logic. Protons make liquid / solid atoms go still when attracting the electrons of other atoms.

Imagine what splash there would be onto the ceiling with the ENTIRE water's atoms vibrating at 1,000 miles per hour. HAHAHAHA. It would instantly break the cup. If every atom is moving 1,000 mph, then every centimeter-square column of water is spearing the cup at that speed. The situation only gets worse for the survival of the cup when you think of the cup's atoms striking the water by roughly the same speeds. The kinetic theory at atoms is a laughable belief system. You can't argue that it's only wee-wee atoms striking at fast speeds such that you don't expect much force. You can't argue that because it's ALL the atoms in the water transferring energy to the cup, and all the atoms in the cup going head-to-head with the water. It'll be a cosmic catastrophe; no life, no beauty, could exist anywhere. Evolutionists went crazy, putting aside common sense, and deliberately rejecting the obvious and logical alternative: atoms tend to the stationary.

When gas atoms merge, attraction forces between them overcomes the mutual repulsion forces that held them apart in the gas form. Most of the free electrons existing between gas atoms, to push them apart, are suddenly gone when atoms merge. See that? And scientists know that objects under mutual attraction tend to the stationary, because it's the nature of attraction to pull until the pulled object is as fully captured as possible. Every split-second of pull slows the attracted object, and logic dictates a constant slowing until all motion ceases. You can't argue against this obvious FACT.

The goofs will argue, ya-but, electrons in orbit don't stop no matter how long the proton pulls it. Ya-but, wingnuts, electrons can't get into orbit before the proton starts to slow it down. Do you think that every atom comes with a satellite-launching company? Do you imagine that every electron approaches a proton perfect for entering an orbit? What kind of a blasted wingnuts are the physics educators? What do they have against stationary, captured electrons? Well, they ruin their entire atomic model and the photon too. Stationary electrons expose the wingnut status of the educators because there is absolutely nothing problematic with stationary electrons. They move only when some force makes them move, but the proton always brings them back to stillness once the force is removed. Duh.

If a vibrating piece of steel is attracted to contact with a magnet, the piece of steel stops vibrating due to the pull. The pull ceases motion. If the vibrating steel is pulled from a half-inch away while the vibrations are only a millimeter (or even a centimeter) back-and-forth, there's no way the piece of steel will vibrate even a millimeter away from the magnet when the steel arrives to the magnet.

The other alternative is simple and logical: no orbiting electrons needed for light or heat formation, just physical solar electrons sailing into the air on a breeze. If the orbital speed needed by a theoretical electron to maintain an orbit is slowed, the electron is without question going to spiral into the proton and get captured just as a magnet captures a ball bearing: motionless. How possibly can anyone believe that electrons never collide, and therefore never slow down, while atoms are merged in close proximity in liquids and solids? The piece-of-trash evolutionists will NEVER put into your mind that electrons can be attached in stationary form to a proton, because they are cursed falsifiers. They are cursed because they know better. The earth has them in leading positions because the end-time earth is cursed, by God, because people let them get away with big-bang science. God takes this personally, don't you realize? Is it only a small infraction?

With stationary electrons, photon science is dead, the way it ought to be. Without the photon, light becomes a normal wave through a wave medium, and the only possible aether in existence is the solar wind. Nothing else is needed for light propagation. There's no need to invent an aether than no one can prove or disprove. The solar wind is in your face. You breath it into your lungs. It gives power to your nerves and muscles once released from foods. Sunlight pumps electrons into our plant foods as they grow, and God's "magic" comes to pass as leaves grow as a result. The animals eat the plants, we eat the animals and plants, and electrons get released as fuel for the body, and for its maintenance and up-keep. Give credit to Where credit is due.

The bombardment of a leaf by sunlight waves, probably in combination with the increased density of free electrons in the leaves, separates the O atoms from CO2's C atoms. The latter becomes a fixed part of the leaf i.e. often our food, and the O atoms get spit out back into the air, where they came from when the CO2 entered the leaf.

The extra electrons in the leaf are the muscle particles that get between the merged C and O atoms, squeezing them apart, with some help from the bombardments of light waves that allows more electrons to get between the atoms, because the bombardments shakes up the CO2 molecules little. Or so is the logic as I see it. The merged atoms are not fully sunk into each other, but only partially so that electrons can get a little between them to begin prying them apart. The higher the heat in the leaf, the faster and easier the O atoms can be pried from the CO2 molecule.

A plant in direct sunlight, but in a cold room, doesn't grow much, proving that the free electrons are absolutely needed in the leaves for plant growth. Sunlight alone is not enough. And a plant in good heat but without sunlight will die. Therefore, the sunlight bombardment of the leaves, in combination with the free electrons in the leaves, together remove the O atoms from the C atoms so that the latter can become a carbohydrate (carbon and water).

As food growers add CO2 from tanks into their greenhouses to maximize plant growth, it means that the earth's atmosphere could use more CO2 to maximize plant growth, especially in higher elevations, for CO2 is heavier than air atoms, tending to reside in the lower parts of the air with greater density.

Drop the price of gasoline, and add more CO2 to the air TODAY while allowing us to enjoy country drives again. Stop the climate-change madness.

Mutated Solar Atoms

A plasma is just a hot material. The plasma is thanks to free electrons, but the goofs want you blind to this, and so they call it heated atoms. "[Plasma] is generated by heating gases to high temperatures or subjecting them to strong electromagnetic fields, causing ionization." Ionization is just a fancy word for atoms losing some captured electrons. But the plasma is NOT due to the atoms, but rather to the high accumulation of freed electrons coming out from the atoms. See that? The fools are the fool-devil on your back with hands over your eyes.

The sun's atoms cannot be merely ionized, or the sun would become progressively positive in charge as the electrons sailed away. This is your starting point for understanding what's going on. While some crippled protons are expected to be washed away into space by the dense flow of solar-wind electrons, the latter will eventually become thin enough to allow solar gravity to attract the cripples sufficient that the wash can't get them further from the sun. Therefore, I expect crippled protons building up progressively thicker in the solar atmosphere, like a dust, and moreover I expect fully-dead protons to wash further out into space because they have zero positive charge. The solar wind is the river that washes out.

Possibly, the solar-wind electrons can bump the dead or near-dead protons all the way to the earth. A near-dead proton is a mutated atom. It is able to attract a few electrons, and thus it might be able to merge (bond) with other mutated atoms to form literal pieces of dust, frozen-liquid droplets, or even helium atoms. They might explain cosmic dust kept afloat (i.e. kept from sailing back to stars) by outgoing stellar winds. Mutated atoms are expected of different sizes depending on how much positive charge remains. The greater the remnant charge, the more electrons it can hold, the larger the mutated atom. If NASA collects solar particles for real (one never knows when to trust NASA), the goofs would confuse them with normal atoms of various kinds, because they don't believe in crippled protons.

If the sun consistently produced the very same type of crippled hydrogen protons, all with the same level remnant charge, there would be an abundance of the same mutated atoms. Helium could be that remnant H atom. I totally REJECT the goofball claim for the source of earth helium from the decay of radioactive metals. These are lunatics with lunatic claims. Helium is not the alpha particle. Helium is not shot out of uranium. THAT'S LUNATIC.

Upon the mutated H atoms reaching earth and entering the atmosphere, the goofs would claim them to be earth-born if their origin from the sun were problematic to any of their key monsters. Lookie: "In the universe, argon-36 is by far the most common argon isotope, as it is the most easily produced by stellar nucleosynthesis in supernovas." Might argon on earth be from crippled hydrogen atoms in the sun? Argon is "noble," meaning it's non-bonding to other atoms, a situation that would develop if an atom lost so many electrons that there's too little electron depth left to accommodate atomic mergers

I've explained why the hydrogen atom is the largest of all atoms, having more stored electrons than any other atom, and so any mutated atoms from the sun would be smaller than healthy hydrogen atoms, and as such would get less lift in the air. If the goofs correctly pegged argon with an atomic mass 2.5 times that of oxygen, it would mean that argon is the smaller atom of the two by a significant amount, in which case, it would get less lift from upward electron currents, which can explain: "Most of the argon in the atmosphere is in the lower atmosphere, with its concentration dropping off significantly at higher altitudes (google)"

It is impossible for argon to form as the goofs say it's produced, from "decay" of radioactive potassium-40. If potassium decays, it's decayed potassium, not argon. The goofs love to claim that atomic elements can morph by decay into all sorts of other atoms because they think it supports their atomic model, where all atoms are essentially multiples of a hydrogen atom. "Decay" is a term used for describing permanent ions, atoms that lose electrons but don't get them back. I can see where radioactive materials from nuclear explosions cripple protons such that they hold fewer electrons. I suspect that atomic decay, as they describe or abuse it, is purely theoretical and false.

I'm just suggesting that solar hydrogen atoms might get carried to earth due to being crippled to some degree. It's not unthinkable. The larger they end up after being crippled, the higher they will hover in the earth's atmosphere. It's known that hydrogen and helium atoms become lost into space, meaning that helium atoms are much larger than argon atoms.

As the devil-blinded goofs don't realize that atmospheric electrons offer lift to all gas atoms, they credit the loss of hydrogen into space with the speed of hydrogen atoms, which is a knucklehead theory. google AI: "[The loss of H atoms into space] occurs when molecules at the upper atmosphere gain enough energy to overcome Earth's gravity, or when charged particles from the sun's wind collide with them." When needed at the upper atmosphere, the solar wind is said to brush across the upper atmosphere. Otherwise, they say that the earth's magnet repels and congregates the solar-wind particles hundreds and thousands of miles above the atmosphere. See any duplicity here that resembles a jerk's reaction?

The unavoidable reality is that solar commotion transfers as motion-energy waves into the solar-wind body. The sun experts have yet to point out that flow of wave energy, so far as I've read. It must exist. Why don't they want to talk about it? Because it looks too much like light waves, and they don't want to look stupid denying it for long while replacing it with a wave-particle duality HAHAHAHA. They are so much better than stand-up comedians for a good laugh.

Their photon-wave is a flying wave. They draw it with a wavy line so that you would be their stupid, but it's still a flying particle. Drawing each one with a wavy line doesn't make it a wave. Don't be their stupid. They invented a flying wave to justify keeping the photon rather than switching to a true wave, HAHAHAHA.

Google AI, so much fun: "A photon doesn't have a shape in the way we typically think of objects. It's a quantum of energy, a fundamental particle of light, and exists as a wave and a particle simultaneously. While it can be visualized as a wave or a particle in different contexts, it doesn't have a fixed size or shape like macroscopic objects." In other words, they haven't got a clue what a light particle is. They are simply trying to save face after going with the photon by saying it's a wave too. The only way to describe it is, a flying energy, HAHAHAHA. It flies through a vacuum, no wave medium needed. The only way to envision this is to be a sheer lunatic at complete odds with the laws and nature of physics. As it has no mass, it's a flying-energy ghost.

If it has no mass, it can't be a particle. These guys don't know how to blush. They say its a particle without mass yet carrying energy, but how can it carry energy on its back if it has no back, and no body, at all? The laws of physics says it can't have energy without mass. Why are these guys not ashamed of themselves for holding to this nonsense? Their photon morphed into pure energy, whatever that is. I can imagine pure energy flying through space, same as I can imagine a witch on her broom, but if I seriously think that massless energy is a reality, I'm a science lunatic. Nobody has ever met a massless energy.

Go ahead, try to imagine a massless energy. Whaddaya see? I see morons who've learned how easy it is to breed morons. If you're having trouble envisioning a massless energy, just check out the pictures of the morons, which are drawn to help them breed morons. They didn't have the courage nor the sensibility to drop the photon, and became marauding morons instead, seeking to steal the children and their parents together, from God.

In reality, a wave is motion energy, nothing hard to grasp, same as when you wrap your car around a telephone post. Whammo, the force of motion and mass together. The light particle is everyday normality, a piece of moving stuff that bumps into atoms as part of a true wave. It's not just the wave that enters the eye, but the electrons the constitute the end of each wave that bump the spot on the eye that sees.

The light wave has no light until it hits the light-sensitive spot to the rear of the pupil. Until then, the light wave is pure and simple physics. Objects do not emit light. A green object is not green until the light wave hits the eye. Outside of the eye, it's not green. The combination of light-wave force and frequency is what makes it green, but only in the eye or brain. Electrons don't shine with light. They create light only when landing in your eye. The electron is the true light particle. God is a kind genius. The fools would rather believe in a flying energy ghost than in an Intelligent God that created a mechanism for creating light of all colors for the eyes, pleasing to the senses. But for the treasonous betrayal of God from men and women, He also made gnats, weeds, molds, disasters, diseases, and death. Who's fault is it? Who owns the universe, God or evolutionists?

Of course, starlight reaches earth by first transferring through aether electrons spewed by stars. You can easily see why the goofs chose not to view light as waves across stellar electrons, because starlight would not be visible at earth until stars exhaust enough electrons to fill the entire cosmos between earth and any star. How long would that take? A lot longer than light reaching us at the proposed speed of light.

As astronomy has clocked the solar wind at about 300 miles per second, that's about 600 times slower than the speed of light, meaning that the goofs would need to increase the age of the universe, as they now have it, by more than a hundred times, if light traveled as a true wave through the aether. The goofs have so many monkey wrenches in their big-bang machinery, they don't want this one too. For their own sakes, they may as well just deny that light is commotion energy through stellar winds.

Sound waves are from the atomic commotion at your vocal chords. The waves are altered in sound by the shape of your open mouth in combination with the position of your tongue. Light waves are not altered by the shape of whatever they pass through, unless they strike the walls of whatever they pass through. If you had a light bulb at the back of your mouth shining light out of your mouth, the light's quality or peculiarity wouldn't be altered by various shapes of your mouth, because light waves train in straight lines due to their instant speed of transfer, and because there is no restriction to motion in the electrons they train through. The aether is not held down to anything, by anything. The aether always moves upward from a stellar / planetary surface.

The goofs can argue that the aether was ever-present in all the cosmos to begin with, because the big bang spewed electrons throughout. That is, in this view, there's no need to wait for stars to fill the cosmos with aether electrons. That's a viable theory at first glance, but even so, they don't want it because they don't want stellar protons crippled or destroyed in regards to their positive electromagnetism. They have no other option, besides crippled protons, because their escape-velocity theory in unviable, impossible. But that doesn't stop them from using it.

They claim that both bare protons and electrons, in a 50-50 mix, escape the sun due to high velocity, unable to fall back to the sun due to too much velocity. The goofs are then forced to create the false theory that the solar wind curves around the earth, rather than colliding with the earth, because the latter situation would slow the solar wind such that its particles are expected to fall back to the sun. Therefore, they have multiple reasons to not have solar electrons striking the earth's atmosphere.

As there's no solar wind reportedly falling back to the sun from earth, and no protons entering the earth's air, the inventors invented the theory in which the earth's magnetic field abducts both in-coming solar electrons and protons. The earth magnet supposedly sends them around the planet to explain why they are not loosing enough speed to fall back to the sun. If they were falling back to the sun, it would be continual over time, until a considerable traffic jam came to a peak, with particles streaming from the sun colliding with particles falling back, and thus in-incoming ones would be slowed further and further from earth, making the volume of the traffic jam grow.

In fact, there is a traffic jam of electrons striking air atoms. These colliding electrons not only slow in speed, but change directions chaotically (due to deflections) to aggravate the traffic jam further. The faster in-coming electrons behind them are thus predicted to push atmospheric electrons around the outer atmosphere, creating the so-called Van-Allen belts. I know this to be correct because, lo, if the earth's magnetic was in fact abducting solar-wind electrons, they would be attracted by one pole only, and would therefore be curved around one side of the earth only, while solar-wind protons would be abducted by the opposite pole such that they would be curved around the opposite side of the earth. But nobody claims this to be the reality.

The reality is that the sun repels electrons, explaining why they do not fall back to the sun when slowed upon collision with earth's air. There is absolutely nothing elaborate or stretchy with the possibility that the sun repels electrons. The only thing needed is destruction of protonic charge within the sun. The "only" thing needed is for evolutionists to admit that protons did not form in the big bang, but that's asking too much of fools who love to bask in the honor of being the smartest people on earth, and who have a drive to keep God dead after their fathers initially murdered Him.

Of course, the admission that stars repel electrons begs whether the negative charge is also the gravity force. When asking google AI who invented electromagnetic gravity: No single individual "invented" electromagnetic gravity...with different figures contributing to its development and understanding over time. No names are given as to electromagnetic-gravity theory.

google AI is not programmed to share that information, because AI is as rotten as it's programmers and feeders. When asking google, "what's wrong with theory of electromagnetic gravity force,"

google doesn't allow AI to respond. The very best reason the goofs give you to deny electromagnetic gravity is that gravity is "weak," much weaker than electromagnetic force. If they are not retards, then they are liars. Obviously, they lie to the people on this matter. google hides discussions on whether gravity is an electromagnetic force, but fronts articles / videos on lunatic concepts of gravity in marriage to space-time.

When you ask the physics buffs how they think gravity is weaker than electromagnetic force, they'll say something like: "two pieces of steel brought near each other barely attract, while two magnets of the same size attract strongly." Wrong. Two pieces of steel don't attract at all because they do not have gravity force within them. Science buffs today go to the experiment of Henry Cavendish more than 200 years ago. Ya-but, has anyone recently proven that two small objects have gravity? Are they famous yet? Nope. Most people who try to witness gravity in small objects find zero attraction. If some attraction / movement of the objects can be found, in some cases with some materials, it's not from gravity, duh.

If one or both of two hanging objects brought close have a slight negative charge, one or the other object can repel some atmospheric electrons from the small gap between both, reducing the electron pressure between them. The two objects might then move toward each other, not because they have gravity attraction, but because atmospheric electron pressure on the backside of one or both objects pushes one or both toward the other. Celebrate atmospheric electrons as a major key to understanding physics of many kinds.

Online: "According to theory, the reason mass is proportional to gravity is because everything with mass emits tiny particles called gravitons." HAHAHAHAHA, said with a straight face. Get me a bowl of gravitons, would'ja? L'il grease on top to help separate them. Anyone ever bump into a chunk of mutual-attracting gravitons? If they are coming out of objects, and if they attract each other, the ground should be strewn with graviton chunks. Besides, attraction can't happen by emitted particles, because they would tend to move objects away from each other. google has no shyness in presenting articles on gravitons, but, sorry, electromagnetic gravity is a like a transgression on google.

Someone at reddit: "The electromagnetic origins of gravity is actually VERY POPULAR [caps mine] among physics 'crackpots'". In other words, the establishment was so concerned that electromagnetic gravity might get the upper hand that its adherents were labeled lunatics. And people like the writer of this quote just spread that accusation around without showing how the theory deserves to be rejected.

I can argue against them: there's no way to prove that mass is proportional to gravity force if the specific mass of planets is found on the ASSUMPTION that gravity is proportional to mass. That's circular reasoning. Even if they can discover the exact force level of solar gravity upon the earth, by first guessing correctly the average mass of the earth, it doesn't prove that gravity is mass attracting mass. Mass attracting mass will forever be a theory at best, especially as the earth makes it plain that earth gravity is a negative charge. It's plain, but evolutionists, frauds, don't want it.

Wikipedia's article on "History of Gravitational Theory": "In 1914, Gunnar Nordstrom attempted to unify gravity and electromagnetism in his theory of five-dimensional gravitation [sounds kooky]. General relativity was proven in 1919, when Arthur Eddington observed gravitational lensing around a solar eclipse, matching Einstein's equations. This resulted in Einstein's theory superseding Newtonian physics." The thing is, it's not hard to explain gravity in a way better than with Newtonian gravity, because the latter is wrong to begin with because it's defined as mass proportional to gravity force. But it isn't proportional.

True gravity is by the negative charge inherent in stars and planets, which keeps all atoms positively charged, and thus gravity attracts all atoms because gravity is a negative charge. There is nothing anyone can say to oppose the mechanics of this theory. Whether the theory is considered true or not, the simple mechanics are solid, and their result of atomic attraction is logically expected. If you can't grasp why a huge, planetary negative charge should keep atoms positively charged, ponder a little more until you get it. It's liberating.

As the sun repels electrons, it serves as evidence that gravity is a negative charge. The swell of proponents of electromagnetic gravity came before the understanding of electrons upon atoms, and the Einsteinian circle of morons went and formed an electron-orbit model of the atom so that what I've just said (about gravity arranging atomic attraction) couldn't dawn on anyone.

Anyone prepared to advance electromagnetic gravity in the 20th century had to do mortal battle with the hydrogen atom having only one electron. Gravity can't blow away the electrons on the H atom, to arrange its attraction to the H atom, if it has only one electron. In order for gravity to attract an atom, there needs to be a surplus of protonic charge above that of the negative charge of its electrons, meaning that every atom has some electrons after gravity blows the weaker-held ones away.

A common reasoning by lay people is that, as gravity can only attract, it cannot be electromagnetic. But they err, because their superiors have lied to them in saying that gravity attracts electrons. There's no proof of that, but there is ample proof that free electrons go up. Show me a bowl of electron gas. Electrons can't exist in a bowl, pulled there by gravity, because gravity doesn't attract them. Nothing accumulates in a bowl unless gravity pulls the stuff there, and electrons are stuff. The goofs know that filaments put out electrons, wherefore, if gravity attracted them, they should form a pile on the floor of a container having a filament and vacuum within.

Or, if one creates an excuse as to why free electrons don't congregate at the floor of a container, but rather rise to the top of the container, then how can one prove that gravity attracts them? Absolutely, the goofers have created experiments to "prove" the weight of the electron, but such experiments would be dubious at best because electrons can be proven to rise in every circumstance of their release in free form. Hello?

Place a hot filament releasing electrons in a vacuum with 1/1,000,000th the volume of normal air, and heat rises drastically to the top of the container such that it will burn your finger if you touch it there. But you can touch the container directly beneath the filament without a problem. What is that? It's not the filament electrons attracted by gravity. Why doesn't this experiment qualify as proof of something? It's such an easy experiment to set up, and since there's no air in the container, no atoms, the only conclusion is that gravity repels electrons. It also proves that electrons create heat, hello, when they go through the container walls and enter your finger.

It's even possible that a vacuum would get the container ceiling hotter, by a burning filament, than a container filled with gas. If so, it proves that the heat is from, not speedy atoms, but from the electrons. For, if heat is formed by atoms in the gas of the container striking the atoms of the container, then we expect a far higher temperature at the ceiling when the container if filled with air. I guarantee, the frauds have conducted this experiment, either deliberately or inadvertently, but are hiding the results from the world because they can't explain it away in favor of their kinetic theory of heat.

Guaranteed, the experiments that "prove" the bending of light due to gravity force were misinterpreted, probably deliberately: "Nordstrom's theory of [electromagnetic] gravitation was subsequently experimentally found to be inferior to Einstein's, as it did not predict the bending of light which was observed during the solar eclipse in 1919." The fools invented the concept that black holes are "proof" of gravity attracting light particles.

"The Eddington experiment was an observational test of general relativity, organised by the British astronomers Frank Watson Dyson and Arthur Stanley Eddington in 1919." It sounds like they deliberately set out to "prove" Einstein's theory that gravity attracts photons, by acting as unbiased scientists. Staged experimentation with false claims are by-design not test-able by the general population (i.e. which is how the stagers get away with false claims).

Wikipedia's article on the Eddington Experiment: "Following the return of the expeditions, the results were presented by Eddington to the Royal Society of London and, after some deliberation, were accepted. Widespread newspaper coverage of the results led to worldwide fame for Einstein and his theories." Deliberation? Like maybe heads clashing in a power struggle, true science be gone?

What did the experiments prove? If anything, only that starlight curves an iota around the sun as it passes near the solar disc. It reportedly curves toward the solar surface, giving the impression that gravity attracts light. Ya-but, the experimenters knew enough in those days that true light waves can curve too, by refraction. Why didn't they credit refraction with the curved starlight, instead of crediting gravity pull? More head-clashing is called for.

The experimenters knew that light refracts "downward", deeper into the glass, when entering glass. They saw starlight bending downward, deeper into the solar atmosphere, but they framed it as gravity pull because they WANT gravity to attract light, for example in order to "prove" that light is not a true wave through the aether. FALSIFYING GOONS.

The solar wind can be construed as the solar atmosphere reaching beyond the planets. It's similar in concept to the Holy Spirit going out from the Father and filling all the universe. Such statements are like acid to the bones of evolutionists.

The solar wind thins out -- the solar-wind particles move further apart, sideways -- with distance from the sun, same as we'd expect of electrons and protons going out from the big bang. If the goofs claim that bare-naked protons sail past the earth a few days after leaving the sun, in spite of that wind consisting of 50-percent free electrons, then how do they think that bare protons got dressed with electrons after a sail of both, millions or billions of miles from the big-bang spot, and at a much-faster speed (than the solar wind) over millions or billions of years? DISHONESTY IS THEIR PROFESSION. They have unknowingly locked themselves into God's prison.

After argon and carbon-dioxide, neon is the fifth-most abundant gas in the atmosphere. Like argon, it's a noble gas, unable to react (bond) with other types of atoms. It therefore looks like another solar victim, because it's odd to imagine God creating an atom that can't join to other atoms. Unbeknown to physicists, noble metals could be made of molecules inseparable by the highest heat that man can achieve. I know mercury to be a huge metal atom because it gets so much lift as to have a low evaporation point (relative to most other metals).

Therefore, the noble gold molecule could be a number of small metal atoms fully sunk into one mercury atom, explaining why other atoms can't get in, and why high heat can't separate the small metal atoms from inside of the mercury atom. Heat (free electrons) surrounding the gold molecule would only press fully-sunk atoms more-strongly into the mercury atom with higher temperatures.

The neon atom looks like a solar-atom cripple. google AI suggests between the lines that neon is from the sun: "Yes, neon is found trapped within the rocks of Earth's crust, though in minute quantities. It can also form in rocks on the surface through cosmic-ray-induced reactions. While the element is most abundant in the cosmos, it is also present in the atmosphere and dissolved in seawater." It sounds like neon originates in the air, then leaches into surface rocks and finally gets washed by rainfall into rock crevices. It looks like a crippled H atom from the sun.

Neon reportedly has an atomic weight exactly half that of argon, and not much more than oxygen and nitrogen, meaning that neon atoms are predicted to be roughly evenly distributed throughout the air, which is indeed the case.

None of the reported atomic weights are accurate as per the specific weights of atoms. The goofs goofed big time when latching to Avogadro's theory, the basis of their atomic-weight figures.

Atomic weights are arrived to by what's supposed to be a reliable reflection of how heavy gases are in comparison to hydrogen gas (though the goofs are not reliable at all times). Where the reported atomic weights are accurate relative to the weight of H gas, they represent the relative sizes of atoms, but in reverse order to the atomic weights. That is, the greater the reported atomic weights, the smaller the atom, though goofs have it in reverse: the greater the atomic weight, the larger the atoms.

So, the O atom with an atomic weight of 16 is larger than neon at an atomic weight of 20, wherefore the O atom gets a little more lift because gravity arranges all atoms to weigh the same.

After gravity has repelled away all atomic electrons (on all atoms) held by their protonic cores with less than the force of gravity, all atoms on the earth's surface will be attracted by gravity with exactly the same force, and that attraction force defines their weight. All atoms end up weighing the same.

It's interesting if indeed both argon and neon arrived from the sun as crippled H atoms. It's interesting because argon gas weighs exactly twice as much as neon gas, meaning that there are twice as many atoms in an argon gas at STP versus neon gas at STP (standard temperature and pressure), which is my theory based on atomic-weight figures, which is the provable fact.

If we cut the number of argon atoms in half at STP, such that there are equal numbers of atoms in each gas, the argon gas pressure will be cut in half, and will therefore be half the pressure of the neon atoms. Therefore, the argon atoms repel each other with exactly half the force when they are the same distance, center-to-center, from each other as the neon atoms are. What could this reveal about their relative sizes? How much smaller does the argon atom need to be in order to have half the repulsion force?

NEWS

Trump's attorney general has called for a grand-jury investigation on Russiagate conspirators.

Disgusting Obamaites, too many of whom are now Republicans poisoning the bowl, used the media to give the people the illusion that leftist ideology is the majority view. This went on for so long that leftists started to believe it, to be true, and so they pushed hard to foist those ideologies on everyone, and are still trying to some degree, even though the hard push ruined the Democrat party over recent years...because, in reality, it was a fringe ideology of the most, bare-naked, wretched leftists. This is the recent history of the United States, a thing to celebrate. But leftists will not go away because they love fighting with deception, because they got addicted to winning with deception.

This is the best non-partisan (objective-ish) explanation of the Russia-collusion crime:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPEHLh1kcp8

News

Here's a nail-biting, 13-minute time waster:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ErHy4fb9NM4

Here's Trump the gangster's buddy:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BaF-7MWRtvg

Here's some of the annex material:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMDDp-y5b9w

Leftist news is covering the Epstein video put out by the FBI, to show several suspicious things. Nearing the 12-minute point, this video producer failed to mention the bottom piece of a computer menu (white, rectangular shape) at the top-right of the video that disappears as soon as the jailhouse clock strikes midnight.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4VOmBBDZwSM