I'm going to go in-depth into Trump's traitorous reversal on his Epstein-exposure policy, but first, I think I can predict that Trump is about to fall to the deep-state shark, again, and also to some Musk pressure.

I had a Sleeping Beauty dream in 1979 that I've been deciphering heraldically since 2016. This has been an extensive work where props in the dream are to tell a story that match news events by first deciphering which surnames the props belong to. This week, I can make Pam Bondi look like she's Sleeping Beauty while Trump looks like he's secretly appeasing Bushite war hawks / neo-cons again, as He did in his first term with Bill Barr. Bondi now holds the important position that Barr once held twice, the first time under president Bush Sr. It's a position important for arresting Epstein's crime ring, but Trump gave that whole thing to Bushites who probably protected Epstein for various reasons.

I'm going to identify Pam Bondi, a pure blond, as another fulfillment of pure-blond Sleeping Beauty, because her first deputy (second in command of her Department of Justice (DoJ)), was Emil Bove, and because I realized, about a year ago, that the Boy/Bove/Boeddu surname was a branch of Beautys/Bowds.

You can load Bove's now, which load on another tab, in order to load other surnames, to better follow the heraldic links.

To begin pointing this picture to Epstein's island, Clintons, first known in Oxfordshire with DOG-using Amore's and Damorys/Amori's, essentially share the Chief of Boys/Bove's/Boeddu's, which is almost the Chief of BONDI's/BLONDi's, the latter first known on Sardinia with Italian Amori's. Dogs/Docks share the cinquefoil of Blanche's, and Emil Bove was replaced in March of this year by TODD BLANCHE, a former lawyer for Trump's political woes. Todd could be running the Epstein fiasco at this time to a substantial degree, forcing Bondi to do what Trumps wants done on the matter.

The dog on the Amore / Damory/Amori crest is very interesting because Trump was the British BULLdog in the Sleeping Beauty dream; he was half swallowed by a shark in a residential swimming POOL. Boys/Bove's/Boeddu's and Beautys//Bowds (Dorset with Pools) both use bulls. And British's/Brodicks share the red fox with Todds and Bondi-like Bonds/Bundys. Blanche's share the Coat of Bush-like Bus', first known in Norfolk with Todds. It can thus appear that Trump deliberately or inadvertently chose Bush loyalists to act as a spy on Pam Bondi, and to enforce his will on her via her deputies.

Bussys, with three of the Bush/Busch fesses, are said to have been of the Buci barony in Northamptonshire i.e. with the first-known Blanche's. These Buci barons married Miss Basset while I see Bassets in the Crest of Bus-related Porch's. Basset-like Bastors/Pastors almost have the Dutch Bos/Bush/Bosch Coat. Bussys are said to have been in "MELTon-Mowbray," and then MowBRAYs are in the colors and format of Blanche's (Northamptonshire with Brays) who in turn essentially share a MILLET Coat.

Bois'/Boyes' are said to be of Bosco's, and while Boso's/Busi's share a bull-on-blue with Boys/Bove's/Boeddu's, Bovers (Yorkshire with Bush's/Buschs) share the fleur-de-lys of the Yorkshire Bush's/Buschs, and both have goat heads.

However, I don't know whether Mr. Bove or Mr. Blanche can rightly be considered Bushites for any reason. I don't know either man aside from what's at their Wikipedia articles. The embarrassing binders that Bondi got credit for distributing can take us to Binders because they share the "banner" (different design and colors) with Boso's/Busi's. Thus, a Bushite in the White House may have made the Phase-One binders, the nothing-burgers that first started to make Bondi blunder.

On this same week that saw Bondi blunder more than ever, Trump decided to go against his promise to his base, to supply weapons to Ukraine. That's a war-hawk favor, right? I'll bet that Trump is working to back the Russians off from their advance on Kiev because he wants to fulfill his mineral-rights deal to the corporations for which he made the deal. Bushite corporations?

I think it's amazing that TODDens/Tottens have four fesses in the colors of the four-and-four, fessewise bars of Porch's who, aside from their Bars, share the Coat of Blanche's and Bus', the latter first known in Norfolk with Porch's, Todds and Tatton- / Toot-branch Tuits/Tute's. Todd Blanche. Plus, to make this more amazing, both Toddens/Tottens and Porch's have similar Crests.

It appears that Someone arranged that heraldry to point to Todd Blanche, and then while the FBI abused the corrupt FISC (FISA court) under Obama, Fiscs, first known in Norfolk too, share an "ad astra" motto phrase with Toddens/Tottens. Porci's happen to share the fleur-de-lys of Machets suspect in the Fisc motto. Is this paragraph suggesting something nefarious about Mr. Blanche?

The Crest of Tattons is similar to the Crest of Haydens (Norfolk again), and both surnames share the same quadrants, which are also the quadrants of Hades'/Hats. The other English Haydens share the black bull of Beautys/Bowds, the latter first known in Dorset with Hades'/Hats. Thus, as Toddens/Tottens took us here while pointing to Bondi's deputy, it tends to suggest that Bondi is an important, third fulfillment of Sleeping Beauty.

Bushers are first known in Dorset with Beautys/Bowds while Bus' (Norfolk with Porch's) share the giant cinquefoil of Porch's (and Blanche's). Then, Porcia's (not "Porci") share the black boar with English Bush's/Busch's, the latter first known in Yorkshire with the Hicks' sharing the fleur of Porci's and Ainsleys. The latter share the scimitar with Haddens, and Hayden Proctor is the only child of Ainsley Earhardt, the second fulfillment of Sleeping Beauty. Another SCIMitar is with Scottish Mochs while Bondi's incorporate the French Moch Coat.

From here, we go to a Busca location in Piedmont, smack beside Saluzzo, and while Alice of Saluzzo married the FitzAlans of Arundel, Arundels use "swallows" while the shark swallowed half of Trump.

That is, after the bulldog jumped / fell into the swimming pool, it ended up HEAD-first into the shark's MOUTH. Heads/Heeds are first known in Norfolk with both Hayden surnames. MOTTs (Essex with Teasels and Head-connectable Este's) can apply here because they share the crescents of Tesla-like Teasels, and Elon Musk probably left dog-like DOGE when he discovered that Trump was removing government hand-outs to his Tesla company. That was when Musk accused Trump of being in the DoJ's (Department of Justice) Epstein files.

Motts are also Morts, and share the crescents of Griffin-loving DEATHs for a related reason. DEETers, first known in Pomerania with Trumps and the House of Griffin, have a DoJ- and DOGE-like dog in Trump/Tromp colors and format. The bulldog in the mouth of the shark thus looks like Trump's political death, now becoming suspect at the workings of Mr. Musk. Deaths are first known in Kent with English Gards (griffins) while Val Trompia is at lake Garda. Kent is also where British's are first known. The British bulldog at our service.

Plus, as I've said a million times, the shark's TEETH were ringed around the bulldog's belly when its head was in the mouth. Teets/Tate's can get us to the Teeter variation of Deeters. Perfect, and English Tate's are first known in Suffolk with Crauns/Crane's while Sharks use the crane, as do Grounds/Crannys while Irish Cranne's/Rings were shown related to Otters/Others who are in turn in the Coat of fenders. Sleeping Beauty appeared at a car's fender.

Tate's are first known in Suffolk with Blonds and Blondville's while Sharks share the trefoil of Blundville's. See that? Bondi is in this heraldic set. Deeter-like Detricks (listed with Dethicks) use "WATER bougets." Blundville's are first known in Cheshire with the Foots in the Blond Crest.

Now, when I saw the bulldog in the shark's mouth, I JUMPed or dove into the pool to save it, but did not see the outcome. Instead, I was instantly transported to a scene in which I was about waist deep in blue water. They were not dark blue, but more like the color we see off the beach of Epstein's island, Little Saint James in the Virgin Islands. I've reasoned that God stuck me in these BLUE WATERs as a necessity for guessing that I was on Epstein's island, because Waters share the Epstein Coat.

I got out of the waters, onto the beach, and the Beach's happen to share the vair fur of Bondi-connectable Blondville's. The latter put their vair in their Chief, as do Pam-like Palms, and the latter are first known in Yorkshire with Beach-branch Beckers who in turn share the Palm vair. Though houseofnames lists no Pam surname, I'll bet that a Pam(m) surname developed from Palms.

German Beckers share the bend-with-checks of Steele's, recalling the Steele dossier. In those days, the Epstein crime ring may have been worried that Trump could spill the beans about the ring, but Trump could have conveyed to the group's leadership that, so long as it doesn't reveal his ties to Epstein, he wouldn't investigate the crime ring.

English Blooms love the Flowers who in turn share the cinquefoil of Potters, the latter first known in Hampshire with Pots in the "flower pots" of Rinds. It's also where Pot-like Posts are first known who are in the Blondville motto. Plus, MILLs are first known in Hampshire too.

Jewish Blooms/Blums not only have "millRINDs," but Rinds share the scallops of English Mallets, the latter first known in Suffolk with Blonds, Blondville's, Buckle's, and with Musk-pointable Starlincks who share buckles with French Mallets. MILEhams (Norfolk with Bonds and Palmers) share the Bond fesse. Plus, Jewish Blooms/Blums, roughly in Potter format and colors reversed, share the double fesses of English Palmers. While Potters and Flowers share the white cinquefoil with Blanche's (beside Hampshire), Dutch Blanks have "mallets." Thus, we find a Todd Blanche connection here to Bondi branches.

I'll then add that Shark-connectable Vallans have a Valletti variation while Valletti is a location on Mallet-like Malta, near the first-known Bondi's/Blondi's of Sardinia.

German Blooms are first known in the same place as German Teegers while Tigers are first known in Suffolk too. Walerans (Devon with Bloom-beloved Flowers) have a tiger in Crest.

On top of these links using the Palms and Palmers, Epstein's Florida mansion is in Palm Beach. Italian Palmers share the fesse upon the "banners" of Binders. Between the two banners is a "knight" while Knights are first known in Suffolk with Blonds and Blondville's. English Palmers share the greyhound of Lucks while "lux" is a motto term of Blonds and Blondville's.

Waters are first known in Essex with Teasels and Muschats while Musks are listed with Muscats. See that? My mother was born to Miss Masci, and Masci's are first known in Piedmont with Busca and Saluzzo. For this reason and more, I suggested to readers, only weeks ago for the first time solidly, that my appearance in this dream is to portray Elon Musk. Thus, when I jumped into the pool to save the dog, it looks to represent Musk at DOGE fully in support of Trump's political agenda. I didn't see the outcome.

Then, the next thing the dream had for us was my being off the beach on Epstein's island, as if to reveal that Trump was there, or that he was heavily involved in some Epstein schemes. It was reported this week that Epstein wished to somewhat copy Trump in his handling of female models for beauty purposes, i.e. he wanted to copy Trump's BEAUTY-pageant theme and sought/promised to make models of his hooker victims. Trump's wife was a model, and David Knight claims openly that he met her in the Epstein ring.

We are then confronted with the fact that the Doge/Dodge surname shares the six BARs of Blonds while Bondi's are listed with Blondi's. heraldic bars have got to be code for Barrs, and Barrels (Herefordshire with Wefers) even share the white dog head with Amore's. Wefers have the Barr eagle, yet the triple Wefer eagles are those of Teasels in colors reversed.

It's notable that the Blond Coat is almost the Amore / Damory Coat so as to connect Bondi's/Blondi's to Italian Amori's who in turn look connectable to Laws, especially if Laws are using the rooster of Sardinia's VISconti's. Vise's, Downs and Knee's share the stag head of Tromp-beloved Acorns, first known in Sussex with Vise's and Arundels. The bulldog walked past my knee and leg, and Leggs have a giant stag head in the colors of the giant Down stag while Knee's are first known in County Down. Downs/Douns can be linked to Dunhams, the surname of Obama's mother, and both Obama and Bush came out publicly, mere days ago, to warn Trump not to release the Epstein files.

To assure that Doge's/Dodge's use the Blond Shield, Eye is a location in Suffolk, where Blonds and Blondville's are first known, and Doge's/Dodge's use an "eye weeping."

The Doge/Dodge SEAdog has thus got to be part-code for Seaman-branch Sea's because Seamans are first known in Suffolk too, along with English Carlsons, and then the wavy bars of Sea's and Seamans are with Tuckers who in turn share the seahorse with Seamans. It could be indicating Tucker Carlson, now openly asking serious/accusing questions about Trump's betrayal of his base on the topic of the Epstein files. Tucker worked for Fox, and fox-using British's/Brodicks are first known in Kent with Sea's, which is where Ticks/Tucks were once said to be first known.

Damorys/Amori's use the dog head in blue, which is what the Barrel dog head is in colors reversed. Barrels almost have the Saluzzo, Clun and Dure Coats; the latter two are first known in Perthshire with Dogs/Docks. This picture can take us, with the blue waters, and also with the blue eagle in the Teasel Crest, and even with the blue "seadog" in the Doge/Dodge Crest, to Blue's, first known in Arran with McCabe's and the Hamiltons of BRODICK. Hamiltons share the Blanche and Dog/Dock cinquefoil, and British's are listed with Brodicks. Andrew McCabe was the deputy director of Obama's FBI (when run by James Comey), a position now held by Dan Bongino.

The Trump stag head is in the Arms of County Waterford, and it just so happens that the Waterford surname, listed with Waterville's, is first known in Northamptonshire with Blanche's. It seems to be dragging Todd Blanche to Epstein's island as per the dream, and we can add that Waters are listed with Waterville's too.

Doge's/Dodge's are first known in Yorkshire with Jumps who in turn share the Trump stag head. The bulldog and I jumped into the pool, though, admittedly, I can't recall whether I jumped or dove in head first. The dog first passed my left leg (roughly a foot away) before jumping into the pool, and Leggs (Dumfries with Bullys and Bells) share the stag head in an Arms of County Waterford, which is essentially the Trump stag head. The Arms of County Waterford shows an eagle head in the colors of the Barr eagle.

Back to Emil Bove, for French Bove's almost have the Coat of Cars while Sleeping Beauty appeared at a car on Epstein's sandy beach. Emil Bove was, like Todd Blanche, a former lawyer for Trump. This picture makes Sleeping Beauty and her car look like Pam Bondi's DoJ (she's the boss of the entire FBI). French Bove's and Cars share the Dog/Dock chevron, and the latter share the Blanche cinquefoil as if to indicate that Bove and Blanche are to be connected to the bulldog = Trump, an accurate picture in reality. They were both Trump's lawyers, and Lawyers happen to share the double, ERMINEd Sleep fesses. SLEEPing Beauty.

Sleeps are first known in Kent with British's/BRODicks. Sleeps (named Sleap in Shropshire) were once said to be first known in Shropshire with Swallow-branch Sallows, the line of Alice of Saluzzo to the Arundels, the latter first known in Sussex with BOARDs. Arundels share "swallows" with Swallows, the latter first known in Lincolnshire with Sleep-connectable ERMINE's.

Bill Barr was in charge of government lawyers, and the double Sleep / Lawyer FESSes are called "bars" by Hall of Names. FESSys/Face's (Northamptonshire with Blanche's) are in the leopard "face" of the Blanche Crest, and the giant Blanche cinquefoil happens to be ermined and in the colors of the ermined Sleep / Lawyer fesses.

Compare Arundels to the Coat of Clintons, for the latter share the Chief-Shield colors of Saluzzo's. Epstein had a painting on his wall of Bill Clinton wearing a blue dress, looking like a child-molesting slut on a couch chair. Both Clintons and Boys/Bove's/Boeddu's share the same two stars in Chief, and Bondi's/Blondi's have three of the same stars in Chief. Bondi's/Blondi's share the erect sword of Fenders, and it just so happens that, as soon as I walked out of the ocean waters to the beach, I saw Sleeping Beauty in the distance walking past/around the driver's-side fender of the car.

We are now going to follow the Lawyers (listed with Layards) because they are first known in Rhineland with German Bush's/Buschs, and with Salome's who in turn share the bend-with-stars of Laws. The colors of the millrind in the canton square of Lawyers are the colors of the mascle in a canton square of Whalleys, the latter first known in Lancashire with Cars, Ratcliffs, and Lawers/Lawrence's. Ratcliffs share the black bull with Beautys/Bowds and Walerans, and the latter two are in the colors and format of Whalleys.

Emil Bove, a lawyer, can be in the Lawyer mill rind because its shared with Emil-like Miles'. Emile's (Yorkshire with English Bush's) are essentially in the colors and format of German Boschs. Busca is beside Saluzzo while Swallows are first known in Lincolnshire with Miles'. Why should Emil Bove be a part of the shark swallowing Trump? Is it because their anti-transparent attitude will devour them politically? They stand poised to lose Congress at this rate because many Trump-2024 voters simply won't come out to vote in 2026.

Miles' can be in the "huMILES" motto term of Holds (same place as Ratcliffs) who in turn love the Squirrels (Worcestershire with Clent Hills). "HUMiles" can also be part-code for Hume's, first known in Berwickshire with Clent-connectable Blythe's. Billets are first known in Devon with Hold-beloved Hazels, Hold-connectable Burys, and Hicks-branch Hooks (share Bury fleur-de-lys) while Hazels share the Hockey crescents.

Bill Clinton's true father was Mr. Blythe, and then English Billets, first known in Devon with Walerans, share the Blanche cinquefoil. Billets share the Coat of Fox-loving Bellows in the "bellows" of Ships/Shiptons, the latter first known in Oxfordshire with Clintons. If this is God's connection of Bill Clinton to Todd Blanche, I have no idea why. Will Blanche go after the Clinton crime ring, with Bondi's help?

Just look at this. Blythe's, sharing the sheaves of Clints/Clents, are first known in Berwickshire with English Boys and Whale's while Italian Boys/Bove's/Boeddu's almost have the Clinton Chief. Clints/Clents are first known in Ripley while Ripleys share the lion of Whalers/Wheelers, the latter first known in Worcestershire with the Clent Hills, and with the Hillarys sharing the six fitchees of Clintons. Bill Blythe-Clinton married Hillary Rodham.

Liz WHEELER was pounding Bondi all week long. Ms. Wheeler was one of the podcasters who received a binder from the White House.

The Whalley mascle can be linked to HANsons (Yorkshire with Ripleys and Clints/Clents), and to this we can add that Hann-branch HAHNs (Trump colors and format) are first known in Mecklenburg with German Trumps/Tromps, ICE's, and Whale-loving Dols, tending to explain why English Alans are in Whale colors, and why Wheels are first known in Shropshire with English Alans.

This brings me to Katrina Hanson, the epitome of a teen model whom I asked for a date as she handed me an ICE-cream cone. I (16 years old) took her on our first date when Dennis Quinn loaned me his parents' Valiant car, and it just so happens that Valiants (Yorkshire with Hansons) use a shark. Vallans share the moline cross of Sarasins (Brittany with the Dol Alans), white like the Wheel moline.

Repeat from above: "I'll then add that Shark-connectable Vallans have a Valletti variation while Valletti is a location on Mallet-like Malta, near the first-known Bondi's/Blondi's of Sardinia." Malta's share the "column" of German Franks, the latter first known in Bohemia with German Lawers. The shark seems to depict Trump's political death, and so let's add that Scottish Vallans/Valence's are first known in Kent with Deaths.

I broke off with Katrina when discovering that she was a couple of years younger than I. She was roughly as tall as myself, and looked my age. She was a tall, thin Dane with blond hair and blue eyes, perfect in appearance. I last saw her when she was being dropped off at her ice-cream store. I was at the entry of RATCLIFF Lumber's parking lot at the time (in Gormley, Ontario). The first fulfillment of Sleeping Beauty was Miss Hicks, another thin, blue-eyed, model-like blond, and it just so happens that Hicks share an Icke variation with Ice's.

The ice-CREAM can point to Irish Cremers because they essentially share a Kilpatrick Chief while Miss Hicks married Hamilton Kilpatrick. A Kilpatrick motto term looks like code for the Bo variation of Boys/Bove's/Boeddu's, and while French Bove's almost have the Coat of Cars (Lancashire with Lawers/Lawrence's and Ratcliffs), Lawers/Lawrence's were at Redmaine while REDmaine's share "cushions" with Kilpatricks. Laws are first known in Northumberland with Reds/Reeds (share Clint / Blythe sheaves) and Rodhams.

I went to the same church as the Kilpatricks under discussion. They then moved to roughly ten miles from the Heath home of John Ratcliffe, now Trump's CIA chief. I'm waiting to see what input Ratcliffe will have against the deep state. I sometimes think he's a scared mouse, but we will see, for he does have moral zeal that can result in courage. Perhaps I'm misinterpreting his careful approach as mouse-like quietness.

Trying to decipher Sleeping Beauty as either a good or bad guy isn't easy. On the one hand, Hicks were a branch of Hooks, which can bring Hookers into play who share the vaired fur of Blondville's, an apparent pointer to Sleeping Beauty as fulfilled by Bondi. Epstein sought model-like hookers. Hookers were in Norfolk with the first-known Hyke's/Hake's and Higgs, and also with Hawk-beloved Pilgrims. I was on a beach with Sleeping Beauty, and Beach's share the vaired Shield of Clappers while James Clapper was the DNI (Director of National Intelligence) under Obama, a position that Trump gave Ratcliffe in 2020.

With Lawyers sharing the Sleep Coat but also able to get us to Beauty-connectable Whalleys and Whale's, it's possible that her sleep theme is like a super act of God that slumbers for a long time, but finally ambushes the deep state, thus predicting that Pam Bondi will turn out to be a good guy after all.

I was told to wake her, which I did when touching her leg at the knee, and she and I went up into the sky in a literal rapture, which can indicate that the ambush, if indeed it happens, will be very near the post-trib rapture of the Church, or within the 666 period. Possibly, because Leggs (same place as Kilpatricks) almost have Trump Coat, Trump will end up a good guy and assist the ambush, betraying the Bushites. Perhaps.

Beauty and I were RISING into the sky, and Bonds, first known in Norfolk with Rise's and Risings, have a "rising eagle." Norfolk is beside the first-known Blonds and Blondville's while Blondi's are listed with Bondi's. The rising scene now seems to be confirming that Pam Bondi fulfills Sleeping Beauty. The Arundels, in the colors and format of the Bond-beloved Eagle's, are first known in Sussex with the Saddocks who use "ears of rye", and the Rise's above are also Rye's, once said to be first known in Sussex.

Eagle's are first known in Lincolnshire with Rising-branch Restons and Rice-branch Reesors/REASONs (fox) while Risings are also Risons. German Lawers are first known in Bohemia with German Rice's/Rise's.

BOYers have a "falcon rising" in the brown colors of the rising eagle of Bonds. English Falcons are first known in Cumberland with Browns and Quints. The latter share the vair fur of Boyers, Palms and Beckers (Yorkshire with Bovers and Palms). Anything that looks connectable to Boys/Bove's is now certain to be a part of Sleeping Beauty.

The Bond rising eagle is in the Crest also of Willis' who share the Branch Coat. Holds use a "branch" in Crest, and Beauty and I were holding each other while rising. Willis' are first known in Berkshire with Susans while Trump's chief of White House staff is Susan Wiles. If ever she was a good person, she's becoming a bad apple.

It's interesting that the Wiles Crest shares five, bunched arrows, though in different colors, with the Arms of Rothschild. The latter shares the five arrows, in the same colors, of BARKsdale's (Hold colors) first known in Lancashire with Holds and Holdings. Barksdale's are in the colors and format of French Blanks. Barks are first known in Norfolk with the Bus' sharing the Blanche Coat. It appears as though God arranged Trump's White House chief, and his DoJ chiefs, to point to Rothschilds, probably the family behind Mossad, and thus probably the family behind the Epstein crime ring, and thus likely a family desirous of an Epstein cover-up.

Berkshire is the location of Windsor castle, and where Fender-branch Windsors are first known. Windsors share the crosslets of Gaines, almost the Wiles crosslets, and Gains are first known in Huntingdonshire with Fenders and Windsor-rooted Others/Otters. Cars share the Willis stars, and so Susie Wiles can be in Sleeping Beauty's car with Pam Bondi, especially as Wiles have the double fesses of Sleeps in colors reversed.

The Windsor crosslets are also with Gore's, first known in Kent with Sleeps, Rothes', SHERlands, and BONGs/Bangs/Bengs. Willis' share the Coat of SHERwoods, the latter first known in Durham with Roet-connectable Bows/Bough's (share Roet motto) who in turn have five, bunched arrows. The first Rothschild banker was Maier Bauer, and while Bauers/BOWers (Bavaria with German Rothes'/Rothchilds) share the green Shield with Scottish Bowers, the latter have five, bunched arrows. Bankers/Benchers are first known in Oxfordshire with the Tams suspect in the motto of Scottish Bowers.

I didn't know until mentioning Bongino's below that they share the Bondi/Blondi Chief. It looks like a pointer of God to the Bongino-Bondi fiasco of this week. Bongino's (Tuscany with Italian Botters/Botini's) have a "curved" fesse to compliment the curved bend of Italian Botters/Botini's. English Botters/Bodins are first known in Hampshire with Buttons/Bidens/Budins who in turn share the Bute/Butt/BOET fesse, and this recalls the Boet variation of Boys/Bove's/Boeddu's who almost have the Bondi / Bongino Chief.

Botters/Botini's are first known in Lucca, very connectable to Luce's, but then we have the "lux" motto term of Blonds and Blondville's, as well as the "lux" motto term of Blacks who happen to share the star of Botters/Botini's and Willis'. These are also the stars of Cars (Lancashire with Barksdale's) and Glass'/GLASSICKs (Bute) to which I point Beauty's car, for she was with a refurbished 1950's CLASSICK car. I can trace "LADY Fortune" of the Class'/Klassens to the Lords/Lauds in the motto of GLASgows (beside Bowers), and here we can add that Lady Fortune holds a banner, a symbol also of Binders.

Repeat while on the Ainsley scimitar: "Another SCIMitar is with Scottish Mochs while Bondi's incorporate the French Moch Coat." Scottish Mochs share the Chief of Schims/Schiens (Aberdeenshire with Banners) while Scheins/Shine's share the giant fleur-de-lys of German Banners.

Glasgow is beside the first-known Scottish Locks sharing a Lick variation with Lucks/Luke's/Looks. Mar-a-LAGO (Trump's home) comes to mind, especially as French Mars are in the colors and format of French Blanks.

Ghislaine Maxwell can take us to English Maxwells (Yorkshire with Bush's): "A stag LODGEd proper, in front of a holly BUSH proper." Lodge's are listed with English Loge's. We should keep in mind that Glasgows share a "flouRISH" motto term with the English-version Maxwell motto. The latter's motto, "ReviRESCO" is interesting where Risco's/Rosco's (share fesse of RISH's/Rush's) share the cinquefoil of Bennys. The Gows/McGoo's suspect in "GlasGOW" share the cinquefoils of French Locks/Desloges'. English Bennets share the Lodge/Loge lion.

Glass'/Glassicks share the mermaid of Masons/Massins (Kent with Binder-beloved Stairs) who in turn share the Coat of Revere's suspect in "Reviresco." Binders love the Knights, first known in Suffolk, where Rish's/Rush's (share white horse with Bennys) were once said to be first known. The classic car was on Epstein's island, where Ghislaine Maxwell hung out.

See my horse rider with kidney-BEAN head later below. Kidneys/Gedneys are first known in Lincolnshire with Blacks sharing the Glass/Glassick stars, and Mr. Black joined the Epstein legal team with Alan Dershowitz. Blacks even share the Maxwell saltire.

However, I can't see why a classic car should point to Bondi. This 1950's feature of the dream has always stumped me. There was some daylight when finding a Glassick variation of Glass'. Perhaps the "LUCtor" motto of Glass'/Glassicks applies to Blond-related Lux's, making sense where Beauty is fulfilled by Bondi. I can trace the Glass/Glassick mermaid to Kidney-connectable Gettes' via French Locks and Loge's. Proto-Geddes Geds were on the Nith river of Maxwell-related Kilpatricks. The Hollys in the Maxwell Crest are first known in Norfolk with Luce's sharing pike fish (different colors) with Geds and Geddes'.

Cat-using Bains/Bane's/Beans, first found in Aberdeenshire with Scottish Banners, have a "catt bot" motto term while Lucca's use a cat, suggesting that "bot" is code for a Botter/Botini branch. French Banes' share the Water and Epstein Coats while BANESters have water BOUGets. Boughy's, in Beauty/BOWd colors and format, share a motto term of Bows/BOUGH's and Rothschild-branch Roets. Bude's/Buds use the bow.

Boughys have an "ANGEL praying" while Irish Prays are first known in County Down with the Knee's sharing the Boughy stag head. Irish Prays share the six pale bars of Coats'/Cotes (Staffordshire with Boughys), and Dan Coats (Trump-appointed, deep-state operative) took over the DNI position from James Clapper. John Ratcliffe took over from Dan Coats. Angels, first known in Lancashire with Ratcliffs, share a "super" motto term with RATterys. Sleeping Beauty went to the hood of a car, and Hoods are first known in Rattery...in Devon, where Supers are first known who are in the motto of Michaels, first known in Surrey with Trots sharing the six Coats/Cotes pale bars.

I wouldn't have known the Barksdale's except that Sleeping Beauty, Miss Hicks, went to church in Barksdale.

Bowers are first known in Peebles, beside the first-known KASH's/Caseys. KASH Patel can thus work into Beauty's car or hover scene because Cash's share the Coat of KISS'/Cush's while I was trying to kiss Beauty awake (as she hovered) when a voice behind me told me to wake her. That's how she got dubbed, Sleeping Beauty.

I didn't get to kiss her awake, but was wanting to, and so I'm thinking it's a pointer to Patel. Case's are first known in Norfolk with the Crows beloved of Kash's/Caseys, and with the Cash- / Kiss-beloved Fountains. Patel-like Pattle's are first known in Northamptonshire with Ladys/Laudymans, and Pattle's have a Coat like that one of Spear-branch Sprouts while Spears are first known in Renfrewshire with Glasgow. Pattle's and Sprouts share the same hearts, and both have the pelican in Crest, as do Biggars (share Glass/Glassick stars) who are in turn first known in Lanarkshire with Kash's/Caseys.

Pattle's share the red scallops of Tass'/Tache's, first known in Suffolk with Lords/Lauds. Pullys have red scallops and another pelican in Crest. Pattle's are first known in the same place as Blanche's while French Blanks (share Pattle chevron) have a "tache" motto term. See that? Tacks are first known in Cambridgeshire with Cash's.

Susan Wiles is a pro-Netanyahu fink in the White House hole. Trump recently sent a message to Israel's courts to let Netanyahu off the hook on his corruption charges, just like Trump wants Epstein-ring goons off the judicial hook.

According to Robert Barnes, Bondi is a pro-Pfizer fink (my term) in the White House, partly from influence from Susan Wiles.

I wrote this section on Saturday, the day Trump landed in KERR county, Texas, to address the flooding there. Cars are also Kerrs, in case that's meaningful.

Ornaments from an Old Trash Dump

Before I bought my current property as vacant land, people were dumping their trash at the front, near the road. It had all been buried however. I moved here with a mini-excavator which I owned, and leveled out the dirt, unearthing some of the junk such as ancient, square-headed nails, and rock-splitting stakes up to a foot long. I varathaned both rusty items and have them displayed on a shelf along with a headless-horseman trinket that was also found in that trash site. I pasted a red KIDNEY BEAN on the headless horseman to act as the head (that had broken off). There is a horse head in the Benny Crest.

I'm telling this story because the horseman trinket is right beside a small tack hammer, itself beside a chunk of fool's gold which I purchased at the Grand Canyon. I'm writing this section on Saturday, after writing the sections below on Trump's new and rejected attitude on the Epstein files, where I depict he and Bondi as fool's gold and trash for betraying the country thus far.

The kidney bean can then be a pointer to the kidney-shaped pool that the shark appeared in that swallowed Trump's head. Is he pointed to by the headless horseman? I've shown how Kidneys/Gedneys relate to the shark in the dream. Kidneys/Gedneys (Lincolnshire with Fish) have fish in saltire in the colors of the Nail/Neil saltire, and the fool's gold is right beside the ancient, square-headed nails from the trash site. Between the nails and the horseman is a chunk of quartz rock that came from the trash site.

Two of the nails are six-inch spikes, and the Spike's (Lancashire with Holdens/Holdings) share a giant and red, two-headed eagle with Beauty-connectable Boyle's/BOYville's. I was HOLDING Beauty celebrationally as we were rising into the sky, and the Spike eagle is in the colors of the ALLERion eagles of Holdings. The latter share the red escutcheon of Allers, the latter first known in Westphalia with Nails/Neils! Allerions are BEAKless eagles, and Beach-like Beaks (same place as Beautys) almost have the six Blond bars. Beach's share the Shield of Clappers while Clappers share the "pike" fish with Geds and Geddes'. Fish-loving Kidneys are listed with GEDneys.

Problem: it seems corny that some old RUSTy spikes should get us to Sleeping Beauty. BUT, the Spike Crest has a "PORCupine" while Porch's incorporate the Blanche Coat. Rusts/Roosts are first known in Kent with Rathes-connectable Rothes'. Rathes'/Ratels share the eight bars of Spike's, which are in half the colors of the eight bars of Porch's. The Eagle's/HEGELs in the Spike Coat are in the colors and format of the Arundel SWALLOWS, and Hagels (Somerset with Pile's) share the lone pile of Wings/Winks, the latter first known in Worcestershire with Square's/Squirrels. We're talking SQUARE-headed spikes.

However, for the first time I've seen, Square's/Squirrels have a new first-known location, now said to be first known in Devon...with Brampton Speke of the Spike's, and with Spice's/Spicers! Lookie there. Devon is also where Pine's are first known in the Spike porcupine. Arundels are first known in Sussex with Hammers.

Holdings and Spike's are first known in Lancashire with Squirrel-loving Holds, and the latter are first known in BURY with Ratcliffs, which could give the impression that John Ratcliffe will do something key to begin or secure the celebration against the people who were behind Epstein. Or am I dreaming?

God will bring the anti-Christ against the Israeli Mossad, all of its evils. Woe to Rothschilian Israel.

Holds have a "squirrel HOLDING a hazel branch" while Hazels (Devon with Squirrels) share a Hessel variation with Hesse's, and Epstein's are first known in Hesse-Nassau while Nassau's love the Billets, first known in Devon with Hazels, English Burys, and Ratcliff-connectable Walerans. All the items found in the trash dump had been BURied. DUMPers share the Nassau and Steele billets.

Steele's share the Barr Crest and the Halper checks. Andrew McCabe (once held Bongino's position) conspired with Stefan Halper on the Steele dossier, from Christopher Steele, deep-state operator. Christophers share "PINEapples" with English Pine's (Devon with Speke and Spice's/Spicers) expected in the "porcupine" of Spike's. Christophers are first known in DALTON-In-Furness (Lancashire with Spike's), and Bill Barr's father (CIA connections) was the principal of a Dalton high school when Jeffrey Epstein was hired as its math teacher!

Bean-like Bennets are first known in Furness of Lancashire, and while Bends/Bents are said to have been Bennets / Benedicts, one of the six-inch spikes is BENT at a 90-degree angle! Someone probably hit it with a sledge hammer in order to bend it like that, and Sledge's share the owl with fool-like FOWLers. The Vowels suspect in the Bennet / Benedict motto are also Fowles', first known in Aberdeenshire with Beans/Bane's and Banners! Beside the spikes is one bent carriage BOLT (deliberately bent at manufacture) from the trash dump, and Bolts with Boltons, likable to Bottle's, are first known in Lancashire with Spike's and Bottle's.

Bends/Bents are first known in Cheshire with CARRIAGE's/Kerricks!

As per fool's GOLD, ThreadGOLDs were looked up because the carriage bolt (no wrench-able head) has threads. Threadgolds have "axes" in the colors of the Halpert/HALBERT axes while English Alberts (Gold colors and format) have a "sledge hammer." Halpers look related to the Sledge Crest. I'll leave the interpretations, as to how these items and heraldic links tell a deep-state / Trump-related story. Fool's gold, to me, looks like a pointer to gold-loving Trump.

Carriage's/Kerricks have a caltrap that they call a "CALtrop" in Crest. Calls use trumpets while Trumps are also Trapp-like Tramps. CalTRAP. Cals/Kale's share the giant Albert griffin. Trapps share the BUStard with Bush-connectable Bustards. Cults/Colts are first known in Perthshire with GALTs and Halperts/Halberts, and the Carriage-Crest calTROP is in the Shield but called a "GALTrap" there. Troops are first known near Perthshire, in Banffshire with the Mucks are first known who in turn share the sword of Mochs who in turn have the lone and erect sword of Bondi's.

I was raking the soil with the shovel of the excavator, which brought a lot of things to visibility, more than what's under discussion, including horseshoes, cow shoes, sheep shears, ancient-style cast-iron iron (for ironing clothes), much colored/ornamental glass, and an intact bottle of Molson Export beer (beer still in it) having a bottle shape from beer sold back in the 1970s and earlier.

The tack hammer under discussion was not found in the soil, but was purchased as a bottle opener, but there is an antique tack hammer on the opposite side of the spikes. I can't remember where this other tack hammer came from. The spikes are between both hammers, interesting where Hammer-branch Hams share the salmon of McCabe's, first known on Arran, an island the name of which I can trace to Irons of Airaines, in Picardy with the first-known Cavetts/Cheve's who almost have the four-and-four bars of Spike's. The latter named a Speke location, in Devon, where Chevers, Molsons and Beers are first known, but also with the Tracys having a Trasher-like Trasse variation. Devon is where Chives' were once said to be first known.

It now gets incredible where Spike-connectable Holdings have BEAKless eagles, for Beckers, with a blue version Beach Shield, have a "bene" motto term while Bene's are listed with Beans!!! The red kidney bean was pasted onto the horse rider years ago. It now looks like a comical act of God in pointing to Trump's betrayal of his base, which he betrayed years ago with Bill Barr. Note that Beaks are first known in Dorset with the Newmans/Numine's suspect in the motto of English Banners. German Beckers share the bend-with-checks of Steele's. The trash dump had many steel parts of all sorts.

The horseman is a RIDER, and then German Riders/Ritters use a "LOG proper" while Propers/Robins are first known in Cheshire with English Ritters/Ruttys. Loge's/Lodge's have a TRESSURE border, and are first known in Suffolk with Tresure's/TRASHers and Tache's. The rider came from the trash dump. That and other items under discussion were found as buried junk, and Junks are in Jung/Young colors and format while the latter almost have the Trump Coat.

French Loge's (share blue saltire with Nails/Neils) were a branch of French Locks/Desloges while Scottish Locks are first known in Lanarkshire with the Flemings who have a double-tressure border. Loge's and Locks/Desloges' are first known in Burgundy with the French Mochs sharing the lone and erect sword of Bondi's/Blondi's while Blonds and Blondville's are first known in Suffolk with Tresure's/Trashers. Irish Flemings share the Blondville vair. Flame's even share the Bond besants. And Scottish Mochs are first known in Lanarkshire with Scottish Locks.

Plus, while German Flemings are first known in Saxony with Billings, the latter likewise share the lone and erect sword with Bondi's/Blondi's. That sword is in the colors and format of German Jungs/Youngs.

The "MELITae AMOR" motto (translated "Love of Malta") of Ritters/Ruttys is interesting where Amori's are first known in Sardinia with Bondi's/Blondi's while Mellets/Mallets (English Rider colors and format) are first known in Suffolk with Blonds and Blondville's. Why should a headless rider point to Bondi?

I find that remarkable, for I've often called Trump, "trash." That's because he became like his base, always said what his base wanted to hear, but only as his game in getting elected. His base always knew he could betray it, but it gave him a second term, a second chance, giving him every reason to be loyal. But Trump is loyal to his ego, sorry. He's not inclined to starting a war against the deep state for helping others. The best he'll do is give appearances of fighting the war, or lambaste only those who attack(ed) him. Lambasting is not the kind of war his base needs.

The people who made the binders gave them to a set of podcasters who were called "influencers," meaning that people in the White House conspired to call Trump's base, brainwashers, in relation to things-Epstein. In other words, Trump himself never intended to go after the crime ring or to expose various government gangsters.

Repeat from above:

On top of these links using the Palms and Palmers, Epstein's Florida mansion is in Palm Beach. Italian Palmers share the fesse upon the "banners" of Binders. Between the two banners is a "knight" while Knights are first known in Suffolk with Blonds and Blondville's. English Palmers share the greyhound of Lucks while "lux" is a motto term of Blonds and Blondville's.

Scottish Banners are first known in Aberdeenshire with Bene's/Beans, and while I added Binders to topic only as per the binders that Bondi gave the Trump base as part of her fool's gold "revelations," Binders are also BIENders! German Biens use bees while Benders have "beehives." German Biens are first known in Silesia with the Brocuffs/PROCks/BROX's while Proctors use nails! BROXtow is where Bunnys (symbol of pedophiles?) are first known while Bee's are first known in Oxfordshire with Bunns while Bonds are also Bunds. English Banners have a "Nil" motto term and share the lion of English Neals. The rabbit = bunny of Mike Pence was named, BUNDo.

This is so amazing because Brocuffs not only share a "lux" motto term with Blonds and Blondville's, but have the Binder banner as a "flag" while Flags/Flecks (Norfolk with Palmers, RISE's and Risings) share the double fesses of Palmers! Italian Palmers have the fesse that's on both the Binder banner and the Brocuff flag. The latter is held by a red griffin that's holding a "flag" also in the Crest also of Blond-beloved Foots. The Blond foot is on a sun while Brocuffs have an English-version motto, "The direction of sunRISE."

Foots are first known in Cheshire with Blundville's and Shirts/SHARDs while SARDinia is where Bondi's/Blondi's are first known.

Lux's share a giant and black bull head with Auto's/Otto's, and Beauty's car doubled as an AUTO because she went to the Odin- / Oddie-connectable hood after passing the fender. Fenders are first known in Huntingdonshire with Others/Otters. Fenders have an otter at the tip of their erect sword, the same sword as Bondi's/Blondi's and German Billings, and then Billungs were politically associated with emperor Otto I. See also the Aude swords.

Bunnys (Nottinghamshire with Goats/Gothams) share the goat heads of BOVErs, and while Ainsley Earhardt of Fox news was a second fulfillment of Sleeping Beauty, Ainsleys are first known in Broxtow with Bunnys. She married Mr. Proctor while Brox's are also Procks. Bovers share five, gold fleur-de-lys with Ainsleys, yet Bovers look related to Banks of Bank Newton (Yorkshire with Bovers and Bush's). Newtons love the Bone's while Bone's were a Bunn branch. Proctors share the Crest of Birds/Burds (Cheshire with Newtons, BROXton more specifically) who in turn share the Ainsley fleur-de-lys in both colors.

Banks look related to the Coat of Benjamins, a potential branch of Bongino's. Bongs/Bengs share the quadrants of Drive's/Drove's, the latter first known in Hampshire with Boves'/Bevis'. The latter probably share the triple helmets of Hermits (share English Bois/Boys lion), first known in Yorkshire with Bush's and Bovers.

I watched a pro-Trump podcaster last night, giving the latest updates on the Epstein fiasco, and he was filming the podcast from the Grand Canyon. I bought the fool's gold at the outskirts of the Grand Canyon, just before or after visiting it.

I'm not yet done because the TACK hammer sitting between the fool's gold (beside nails) and the kidney-bean horseman reminds that Tass'/TACHE's are first known in Norfolk with Blonds and Blondville's while Tacks are first known in Cambridgeshire with Nail-loving Proctors. Then, as if to connect Todd Blanche to this piece, "Sans TACHE" is the motto of French Blanks.

Between the nails and the kidney-bean head is the quartz rock (roughly a 3-inch cube), and the Lords/LAUDs possibly in the "laudamus" motto term of QUARTers/MacWATERs may apply who share the giant Benz lion. Lords/Lauds are first known in Suffolk with you-know-who, and Ladys/Laudymans are first known in Northamptonshire with WATERfords and Blanch's. Waterfords have "water lilies" while Lilys are first known in Worcestershire with Rocks and Rooks. Quartz rock.

Susans, first known in Oxfordshire with Bunns and Lille's, use a giant lily, and then Susan Wiles brings us to the Arrows/Arras' in the Wiles Crest. The Arrows/Arras Coat is almost the one of Bovers, and the latter share the Bunny goat heads. Lille's use a "swallow in flight," begging whether Wiles' White House, now suspect by some podcasters in partnering with Blanche to dismiss Trump's base, may be the shark that swallows (ruins) Trump when Bondi is Sleeping Beauty. By the way, Wiles' share five, bunched arrows (different color) with Bover-like Bowers. The Arms of Oxford has a BEAVER.

Bewere's share the horizontally-split colors of Bongino's, and Bovers, minus their goat heads, are in Benjamin colors and format. German Beavers are diagonally split in Bongino colors. Benjamins (Norfolk with Bonds/Bundys) are in Bond/Bundy colors while Bongino's share the Bondi/Blondi Chief. Bongino's have a "CURVEd" fesse while Carve's are listed with Quarter-branch Carews/Carrots. Carvers share the BANK and Bover fleur-de-lys, and Banks have a Coat looking related to the Benjamin Coat. Bankers are first known in Oxfordshire with a green beaver while Greens are first known in Kent with Bangs/Bengs/Bongs.

While I approached Sleeping Beauty upon the beach with only my JEANs (shirtless as a pointer to Bondi's of Sardinia), Worcestershire is where Jeans/Jane's were once aid to be first known, but are now said to be first known in Cornwall with Carrick-branch Carews/Carrots, so excellent because the latter two surnames share "bien" in their motto. Plus, Carews/Carrots share the lion of Quart-like French Quarre's/Carre's while I was walking shirtless toward Beauty's car.

Jeans/Jane's share the scallop of Pullys (Yorkshire with Bruce's), and the lion of Bruce's whom Marjory Carrick married. Pullys share the red scallop with Tass'/Tache's.

When getting to the passenger door of Beautys car, I saw her hovering in distress. Safe to say, Bondi is hovering in distress all this weekend after taking a horrible trouncing all week long. Hovers/Hoffers share a leopard face (different colors) in Crest with Blanche's, and so this could explain her hovering, not knowing whether to stick with the Blanche-Trump team or tighten up with the will of Trump's base. How long will this indecision last?

MEGYN Kelly has been lambasting Bondi all week, and Megyns/Meakins happen to have a chevron-with items in the colors of the chevron-with-items of Cars. Hovering in a car. It makes Ms. Kelly look like she's at Beauty's car scene.

Moreover, while Epstein was a math teacher, Scottish Maths/Manns are also Maghans. English Maths/Matthews have the Coat of English Clare's in colors reversed, who are first known in Suffolk with Teachers/Tass'/Tache's. The latter, sharing a red scallop with Maths/Matthews, have both the Clare and Math/Matthew chevron. Teacher-like Tackers/Tackleys are in Barr (and Trump) colors and format. Epstein worked as a math teacher at a school run by Bill Barr's father.

Barrs incorporate the Coat of Italian Este's while English Este's are first known in Essex with Thatchers/Thackers. Essex is also where Waters and Muschats are first known sharing the Epstein Coat, all sharing triple-red chevrons with English Clare's. Essex is also where Pass'/Pascals are first known in case you can figure out why PASSenger DOOR can apply to them.

Tackers/Tackleys share the wolf head of Scarfs in the "scarf" of Trabys, and the Bonds share the besants of Trebys, the latter first known in Devon with SINGERs, whom I had previously proposed for the pasSENGER door. Singers (Devon with Bears/Beers) share the sheaves of Sticks, whom I trace to the Astikas' (Lithuania) whom a Traby entity of Poland married. German Sengers/Singers have the bear.

Kellys, as per Megyn Kelly, share the lion of one Dalton/ALTon surname while the other Daltons/Altons share the fesse of Italian ALDa's while Scottish Alda's are first known in Ayrshire with Barrs. I'm now amazed that Scottish Alda's share the head of a "cherub" with Tacks/Thackerys, as if God set up the Teacher surname with Tache's in order to point to Barr and Epstein.

English Doors are first known in Herefordshire with Wefers (share Barr eagle) and Barrels while the latter share the white dog head with Amore's, the latter first known in Oxfordshire with the Bee's in the Door Coat. Bondi's are first known in Sardinia with Amori's.

While standing at the passenger door, after Beauty fell asleep, I heard God say behind me, "...it's you she LOVES...go wake her." Barrs share the red lion head with Love's and Musks/Muscats. Love's, first known in Oxfordshire with Amore's and almost having their BARs, were kin of Muschat-like Musks/Muscats (Cambridgeshire with Tacks/Thackerys), and I've proposed that I might represent Elon Musk in this dream. But, how possibly will Musk come to get involved with Bondi? It's not making much sense here, though Musk makes a lot of sense earlier in the dream, when I jumped into the pool to save Trump the DOGE-like dog.

I've said many times that I dated Kelly a month or two before dating Diane MUSCHATov. Kellys father was a song writer, and English Write's happen to share the Door leopard face and the Hover/Hoffer Crest! It appears that those two ladies relate to the Sleeping Beauty dream, which I had some six months or less before meeting Kelly!

I've said many times, that, while I was at Kelly's place, I got a miraculous Bible-message from God, "You shall HAVE a song," those very words, and Have's/Haafs use ducks while German Ducks are first known in the same place with Hovers/Hoffers! English Ducks are first known in Somerset with Heffers. The latter have three lions in pale in colors reversed from the two lions in pale of Duce's. Somerset is where Battants are first known in the comBATTANT lions of Kellys, but also where Singer-connectable Sticks are first known.

AHHHH WOW. I've said many times that my first ladyfriend as a Christian was Sharon Pascal!!! Pass' are listed with Pascals. PASSenger door! I had the dream about a week after my conversion to Jesus, and Kelly followed Sharon! Sharrons share the PENDERgrass Coat, and Penders have lion heads in the colors of the Kelly and Grasse lions. Thatchers (Essex with Pass'/Pascals) have GRASShoppers.

It appears that my first three ladyfriends (all blonds) after the dream related to the hovering scene of Pam Bondi, and so it does seem that she's in distress due to harsh criticisms from Megyn Kelly and other pro-Trump clown acts (like dancing puppets). If you haven't noticed, pro-Trump podcasters are entertainers seeking to make the MAGA movement "holy" for money-grubbing reasons. Many of these podcasters, like Trump, will say "God" or "Jesus" now and again, but their spirits do not convey Biblical Christianity at all. Instead, they are terribly worldly, including Bongino. The latter has a dark / demented side, beware. They all have a serious side, however, where they can't stomach rule by Democrats, and for that I'm thankful.

I cannot even begin to predict the wake-Beauty scene in the context of Bondi's bad week this week.

Have-like Havers (Norfolk with Bonds) use rooks in Bond colors while Rooks are first known in Worcestershire with Halpers/HALFpennys, a branch of Halps/Halfs/HELPs (Lincolnshire with Grasse's), and then Have's are also Haafs. Bondi's are first known in Sardinia with Avesnes-line Avezzano's, and Avesnes is on the Helpe river.

Hovers/Hoffers, sharing the white leopard face with Scottish Doors, are first known in Westphalia with Velins who share ducks with Have's/Haaafs, with Kidney-connectable Nails/Neils, and with German Ducks/Dockers (Vallan kin) while Duck-connectable Doxeys/Dorseys (Staffordshire with Duce's/Doocys) share a Dock variation with Dogs/Doags. I can see that we are at the shark-bulldog scene here. Duc's/LeDucs are first known in Brittany with Shark-like Sarasins while Italian Vallans share the Sarasin moline. English Dockers and Daggers/Dackers are first known in Cumberland with Saracens who in turn share the crescents of Tunbridge's, the latter first known in Kent with the Vallans/Valence's having the Duck/Docker Shield in colors reversed. Kent is also where the Bongino-connectable Bongs/Bangs/Bengs are first known.

Sarasins and Vallans/Valletti's share the giant moline of English Becks while German Becks are first known in Westphalia too. Thus, the shark should be on Epstein's beach, so to speak, as the Intelligence and Banking world behind him. Rothschild bankers started in Hesse-Cassel, and Epsteins are first known in Hesse-Nassau.

If I in the dream represent Musk, then, as I woke her up to a happy ending, perhaps God will cause Musk to become a good guy, maybe even snitching on and opposing the people who prefer global-control skinchips, AI, etc. I'm going to conclude theoretically that Musk jumped into the pool with shark to help Trump, then fights him on Epstein transparency, then wakes Bondi up while she's in distress, then ruins Trump politically such that he becomes a lame duck at the mercy of the globalist shark.

Earth-Magnet Bunk

If the north pole has an electromagnetic charge while the south pole has no charge, that doesn't make the planet a magnet. To explain a warmer Arctic zone than Antarctic, one can also posit that the earth's rocks simply makes more heat at the Arctic, in which case the north pole should be negatively charged (on that basis). I can see how the earth's rocks can become negative with destruction of protons, yet a negative magma pool could conceivably make rock atoms, higher up, net-positive, meaning that the north pole could possibly emit a positive charge. Either way, it's going to attract a magnet needle because one of its ends is positive, and the other negative.

Northern and southern aurora lights are waves of energy traversing across air atoms. The energy of the waves has got to be from protonic destruction that sees sudden releases of captured electrons. This is nuclear energy being released. The waves penetrate the rocks, then pass upward through the air's electrons. The waves knock electrons off of air atoms in all directions, causing light in all directions. Visible light is always formed when captured electrons are jolted outward from upon atoms. Each jolt forms one wave through the electron aether. Each jolt is the true definition of one light quanta.

The aurora's light is NOT from the "magnetic field," as the goofs claim. Aurora's occur mostly in colder months, and in clear skies, because the waves from earth's interior are more restricted (made weaker) by humidity in the air, and by more-dense electrons in warmer months. Atmospheric heat is from atmospheric electrons.

It thus stands to reason that aurora formation is not due to magnetism at polar regions. That is, auroras could form in equatorial regions except that the air in these regions has too high an electron density to allow air atoms to light up. The waves from the earth's interior need to surpass a threshold of force level before they can light up gas atoms.

Had the goofs accepted atmospheric electrons as the true definition of atmospheric heat, they might have realized why auroras form only in the polar regions. But, bonanza, their passionate rejection of atmospheric electrons originating from the sun is facilitated happen-chance by the known fact that auroras occur only at the polar regions. This gives the goofs the distinct opportunity to teach that there is in fact an earth magnet, and so they go for it like mad. All they need to do is say something like what they do say:

An actual aurora is produced by a large number of continuous solar particles interacting with geomagnetic ions. When a large number of solar particles collide orthogonally with a large number of geomagnetic ions, the energy density excited is huge, forming a new substance, which represents an aurora.

Forming a new substance? Are they mad? Absolutely. Any normal person can witness with their own eyes that the aurora has origins from energy within the planet, for anyone can watch the aurora waves flow upward into space. But these morons want you to believe that the aurora is formed by waves originating in the sun. They probably have no idea how the earth can form such waves, but I submit to you that it's from the destruction / crippling of rock protons. The sudden release of an atom's electrons is a nuclear explosion, and so it creates light waves, one wave per released electron, that penetrates the rocks and finally out into the air.

The goofs so wish for us to believe that the aurora light relates to the magnetic field that they will go so far as to say what the theory predicts: the light can occur even above the atmosphere. But we are dealing with liars all over the place. They are the useful idiots of those who long ago had an agenda to deny us the realities. To this day, they pass on the old falsifications.

It stands to reason, where gravity force is sourced in heat, that the greatest gravity source is from molten rock. We can further reason that the heat of the molten rock will spread to the core of the planet, continually, such that the core can be expected to be continually molten. If the gravity source were significantly to one side or the other of the core, then people on one side of the earth would weigh more than on the opposite side. As things weigh the same no matter where they are on the planet, it's safe to say that the gravity-source heat is centered at the core.

If you put your head against the underside of a rock arch (like in an arched doorway), the hundreds of pounds of rock in the arch will weigh exactly zero on your head. In the same way, all of the solid and quasi-molten rock surrounding the molten core ought to weigh zero in spite of the molten core being the main gravity source of the planet. The solid rock, we may assume, cannot move down into the molten material, because it forms a solid arch around the molten core. This kills the theory that once came to mind, that the weight of the rocks is what cripples protons.

BUT, if God started with a cold center in the planet, then heated it, the core rock would expand with heat, because heat is free electrons invading a material, and every material invaded with heat expands because electrons in the atomic spaces repel each other in all directions, and thus push the materials' atoms further apart. MATERIAL EXPANSION. That's how it works.

Therefore, as the core, molten rocks expanded with heat, they pressed against the semi-molten rocks above them. Conceivably, this pressure is what could be crippling protons such that there is a constant release of heat to keep the core molten, and thus to maintain gravity force.

With every doubling of distance upward from the molten mass, there will be eight times the rock volume for the heat to spread out in, which may predict eight times less temperature too, if specific temperature is proportional to free-electron density. By the time the central heat gets to the surface, the dirt a few feet beneath our feet is at less than room temperature.

Conceivably, when some semi-molten material falls into the molten pool, molten material comes in to replace the region once having the semi-molten rock, and this is what might cause earthquakes. The last think you should do is accept the explanations of the goofballs for anything such as the cause of quakes, because its just guesswork. Nobody knows for sure why quakes take place.

Epstein Jailhouse Video

Here's one pro-Trumper who ALMOST criticizes Trump for the Epstein cover-up:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLVEukttyyk

Both Liz Wheeler and Megyn Kelly tell us that the two FBI chiefs are not lying about the Epstein files, even as they see the two covering up the issue. Ms. Kelly has said some things to play down the realities, to the point of suspicious, almost like she's elected herself to be a sort of gate-keeper, defined as one who minimizes the damage to Trump / Bongino when in trouble. Kelly has said that Virginia Giuffre is a "liar," that she lied about Alan Dershowitz, for example, as well as a "lot" of other "total" falsifications.

Ms. Wheeler wants Trump to fire Pam Bondi, yet it's Trump who's responsible for what Bondi has said. I don't think Bondi wants to lie about this. I say Trump's forcing her to lie, as well as Bongino and Patel. There's no way that Bondi is gas-lighting the American public without the nod from Trump. Why don't pro-Trumpers get onto Trump to pressure him to reveal what's going on, make him condemn himself when he himself supports the cover-up. But, I think, pro-Trumpers are too weak to do this, unwilling to tank his political platform over this issue, such a shame. Watch Wheeler portray Trump as innocent, and learn from it, because the problem goes beyond Trump's Justice and the FBI to pro-Trump podcasters.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvJqQV4ckRU

Here's Trump's press secretary, speaking for Trump, on the latest Epstein news from Bondi. The press secretary, by claiming that no guilt was found by the FBI, is admitting that Trump is blocking the files from going public. The press is not asking the press secretary the right question, which is something like: "how does President Trump feel, for or against, about this cover-up by his Justice department"?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OmoENFoQc8

It's not Bondi threatening Trump's political career by her lying, but Trump is threatening her political career by demanding that she lie. Ditto for Patel and Bongino. Shame on these men for letting it happen. Better to quit politics than to cover gross crimes like this when you are the top cops. GREAT SHAME.

Glenn Beck wants Bondi fired instead of calling for Trump to step down. We are right back to Trump-Sessions, Trump-Barr, Trump-Wray, where Trump was responsible for the non-action of those three men, yet he tried to blame them in order to protect himself. This time, Trump's podcasters are trying to blame Justice because it would look seriously bad of Trump if her were to blame them for a cover-up, and it would look equally bad if he were to claim there is no cover-up.

But it's still early. It's been less than 24 hours since news broke out of the DoJ message that there will be no further move on the issue. Sooner or later, some pro-Trumper newscasters are going to point the finger at him, not happily. Those that don't should be considered Trump zombies or loyal lap dogs rather than reliable journalists / news commentators.

The very-good video below shows that the jail-camera footage provided by Patel, of a hallway near Epstein's cell, lost a full minute beginning at 11:58:58 pm, suggesting that someone, perhaps the killer, came by the camera at midnight. It looks like someone doctoring the video tried to fool someone(s) into not realizing that a minute was lost.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKFTeXukqBw

Check out the menu, spotted by eagle eye shortly before 23 minutes of the video above. Oops, Patel and Bongino are in trouble passing off an edited video. Eagle eye then tells that the menu disappears for good after midnight, which may have to do with the sudden, small shift of the picture at that time.

The question then arises as to why the FBI hoaxers didn't remove the menu. I suggest they didn't see it. Only a small fraction of the menu can be seen. Or, perhaps, a whistle-blower type arranged for the menu to be seen, claiming later that is was a mistake. That is, someone tasked with, or the overseeing of, editing was opposed to its editing, and deliberately showed proof of editing. I hate to make it seem that Bongino and/or Patel provided the menu, in case this wrongly portrays them as good guys, but it's possible.

An alternative is that the people responsible wanted to get caught because they laugh at us for being unable to stop them. But when they do such things, they provoke God to thwart them just when they're laughing hardest.

Patel promised us that this jailhouse video proves that nobody went into Epstein's cell, but anyone could have walked along the wall, below the banister on the floor of the small room having the camera, because a person could not be spotted there by this camera. Patel and Bongino both know this, wherefore they are lying, sticking up for the deep state. Bongino robbed his viewers of millions of dollars when preaching like a foe of the deep state. He may as well have been pretending because he's now covering for that corrupt gang.

The youtube video above shows a storage room beside every jail cell, where a killer could have been kept until midnight, and, after he killed Epstein, he could have gone out the door 46 where the camera has a minute missing. Or, a prison inmate in the same area as Epstein's cell could have done the killing with no need for anyone to go out door 46. Or, Epstein could have been allowed to exit door 46 during the missing minute.

Or, Epstein may be the person wearing what looks like a hood, who exits door 46, and when a hooded person returns through the door inward, it could be somebody else wearing the same clothes to deceive the viewer. If this is true, then they may have spliced a minute from the camera to deflect from the fact that Epstein walked out wearing a disguise. In this theory, the people who claimed to investigate Epstein's neck fracture were part of the cover-up so as to make the world believe that, one way or another, Epstein is dead.

Or, the guy in the long hair or hood, which the video owner thinks is a woman (about 35:00 minutes), goes out door 46, and the killer may be coming in the same door a few seconds later, who stands about 4 inches lower than the door, making him about 6'4" tall. He leaves through the same door about ten minutes later, more than enough time to strangle Epstein. The short one with long hair or hood, who looks like he wears a monkey suit to disguise himself, seems to be a part of the plot, if indeed there is a murder plot taking place.

It took the door opener a full minute to open door 46 for the tall, young, muscular man. One explanation is that the door opener was instructed not to allow the tall man go back through the door until there was confirmation, from someone else, that Epstein was dead. Otherwise, they would need to send tall man back to finish. Even if this tall man is a prison guard or policemen, he could yet be the killer. He could be a regularly paid government killer. The problem is, the video doesn't show where this man went once he got down the stairs.

The video owner below spots a person in orange clothes going up the stairs toward Epstein's cell, shortly after 10:30 pm. If you want to fast-forward to this scene, start at 8:30:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWRHtp4FeFU

When the orange appears up the stairs, the person is clearly to the extreme left side of the stairs, indicating that someone is either coming down the stairs at the same time (forcing the orange man to the far-left), or someone is escorting orange man up the stairs (the latter makes more sense).

As this man in orange was visible on the camera, Patel and company claim that he was Epstein going to his cell at about 10:40, which is roughly the time showing on the camera's timestamp. Ya-but Patel may be repeating a lie from someone(s) else claiming that this man in orange was Epstein, to hide the killer. It could have been his killer, for I had read, years ago, that a muscular man was placed into Epstein's cell.

The obvious scandal now is, something the video owner directly above missed, and something I've yet to see in a video as of Wednesday morning: how was Epstein at the bottom of the stairs at 10:39, when the man in orange is seen going up the stairs? This is very problematic, for in the other video further above, soon after the 2-minute point, we see a man fitting Epstein's description (white hair) escorted toward the same staircase while the camera time is at 7:49 pm. ??? Clearly, Patel has some splaining to do.

All inmates were to be in their cells by 8 pm, explaining why we see a man with white on the top of his head at 7:49. I assume the youtube-channel owner showed only this one man cutting across the camera view because he figures it's Epstein. I haven't seen the video from start to 8 pm, but assume that men in all eight cells on Epstein's floor are shown coming across the camera prior to 8 pm, after having dinner. It would be a simple matter to count how many inmates come across, though whoever arranged the video may have deliberately included less than expected total, to allow a scenario where Epstein's climb to his cell could be falsely reported at 10:39. I'm thinking that the man at 10:39 is a bad guy who would later assist in the criminal plot, and so to hide this possibility, the FBI wants us to think that it was Epstein. Otherwise, we'd get suspicious about an extra man, above and beyond the number of inmates, going up at nearly 11 pm.

In order to allow less than the total inmates showing on the camera, just publicize the camera scene (for public viewing) beginning after one or more of them have cut across the view. The 11-hour camera offering begins at 6:40 pm, and so I'll assume that at least one inmate is on that camera prior to 6:40.

It would be a simple matter for some people (not me) to discover whether there was a second man with white hair in the eight cells. If not, then the man with white head at 7:49 must have been Epstein. Yes, for, starting at 6:50 of the video below, we learn that Epstein was escorted from his cell at about 7 pm to make a phone call, and then returned to his cell more than 20 minutes later, which could expect him across the camera at 7:39. The speaker in this video doesn't know about the orange suit going up the stairs at 10:39, and he may not know of the claim that Epstein went up at about 10:40:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6CHOM2i5LQ

The orange-on-stairs video showed a government document telling that Epstein was put into his cell at "about 10:40." Therefore, there are two different accounts of the time he was locked up for the night. It strongly implies a suspicious man at 10:39.

How convenient is it for the jailhouse to claim that the camera showing Epstein's cell door was "working" on the night of the murder, but not recording? How can that contradiction be? Why is this story being circulated at this time? Because, the story is that it was not recording for many days, which is impossible unless the guards were complicit with the murder, or at least were obedient in not complaining that the camera was put out of commission. Any guard would have realized why the camera was put out of commission after Epstein was found dead. That's called criminal complicity too, if the guard doesn't report it.

Therefore, to protect the guards, the story is that the camera was working so far as the guards watched it, but while all looked normal to the guards, the camera wasn't recording. Baloney. Some guard monitors all cameras at all times, responsible to assure that all cameras are working, especially as this is a "high security prison." All guards allowing a camera to go out for many days in a row would be guilty, especially if all guards on all three shifts, per day, said nothing to the people in charge of cameras. Therefore, to hide the complicity of the guards, the report now is that the camera was recording as far as the guards' monitor is concerned, yet the recordings are conveniently not recoverable by the jailhouse. BALONEY.

Watch Trump, the piece of trash, trash a reporter for asking about the missing minute on the jailhouse video, which only makes this junk look guilty in the cover-up. We now want to see whether his voters will properly abandon him. But, not wanting Democrats in power, his base is now left with a piece-of-junk irony. People who deny protection for abused children are better drowned in the sea as human trash. Having billions of dollars doesn't give anyone value, because it comes only with conformity to Jesus. He's True Riches.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zU5mmmtze-g

Trump wants to send a message to his podcaster supporters not to talk about Epstein. That's censorship, because Trump is well known to punish anyone who crosses him. In this regard, he's just like the deep state. Yes, God punishes too, but for the right reasons. Trump is now threatening to punish those who want great sins punished.

I cannot fathom a jailhouse camera deleting one minute every midnight on some kind of a glitch unknown to other cameras. I cannot fathom any jailhouse leadership being okay with missing a minute at midnight unless there is prior understanding that this one minute is opportunistic for deliberate foul play by the jailhouse, if needed. The deep state is expected to arrange such opportunities to silence foes. The deep state can imprison foes, then threaten-to-silence them there, or, if deemed necessary, to end their lives.

I was perplexed as to why orange-up-the-stairs was not viral even by week's end. Nor was the computer menu mentioned in any other video I saw. The two videos having those items made it to youtube's front page, yet their-most important points have not been spread. One could say that the menu was used by the FBI to alter the clarity, but it could also have been used to removed the 62 seconds at midnight.

Trump Wipes Out

When Trump interrupted Pam Bondi before she could answer two questions, one of them was whether Epstein was involved with Intelligence, and when Trump had finished interrupting, Pam Bondi insisted on answering the reporter, but only laid down her defence of her Epstein cover-up WITHOUT answering whether Epstein was a U.S. Intelligence operator. Instead, she claiming ignorance on the matter.

As Trump must know that Epstein was with Intelligence, he looks like a deep-state operator for not having the same zeal as his base for exposing deep Intelligence corruption. He gave appearances of considering the Epstein issue important before getting elected, but he was only feigning promises of bringing justice, as one method of getting elected.

Plus, he doesn't want Epstein news overshadowing news on his own self as he tackles various issues. The reason he publicly comments continuously is, not because he wants to be transparent, but because he's addicted to seeing himself on the news. He has a sick dream of being glorious amongst men, and to help that along, he portrays himself as glorious. Christians should not participate in this satanic personality.

Is it not strange that Bondi doesn't know whether Epstein was with American Intelligence? How much time has she had to pick up the phone, or ask a servant to pick up the phone, to call John Ratcliffe, to inquire? Why won't Fox news just ask Ratcliffe the next time he appears on a Fox show? Or, why won't Fox or anyone else ask Ratcliffe at anytime by any method? Hey John, can you tell me whether Epstein was working for the CIA?

I want to thank Trump for the way he talked to the journalist above, because Trump could not have revealed any better that he's guilty of some involvement with the Epstein cover-up and/or Epstein's crimes themselves. Here's an analysis of Trump's scolding of the reporter:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCZwewDqJQs

Trump jumps in to interrupt before Bondi can answer as though he's the leader of the cover-up; he makes it so plain. The question by the reporter is exactly appropriate since Bondi released a dead-end report on the Epstein files the previous day. Trump should have been shocked by Bondi's dead-end report, if he were acting natural, because it's the first Bondi gave the impression that Epstein is a nothing burger. But, of course, Trump is the dictator of Bondi's 180-turn.

She has exposed herself as someone not prepared to release anything unless he's okay with it. But I'll go further and disclose that Trump spoke privately to Bondi and the FBI chiefs in exactly the same way he's speaking to the camera, conveying to them that he doesn't want any more emphasis on Epstein. How do I know? Trump made it obvious on camera.

After the 12th minute of the youtube video above, Bondi is shown telling a new story in contradiction to her story told on camera weeks ago, where she claimed that Epstein is recorded with minors in "tens of thousands" of videos. I'll give her this, that she didn't mean that Epstein was in all of those videos, but she did intend to say that Epstein and others were in the videos. She's now implying that he wasn't in the videos. She's exposing herself sinning for Trump, sinning to keep her job.

Bondi must know that Epstein's prosecutor (i.e. former Attorney General of Florida), Alex Acosta, who gave Epstein the "sweetheart deal" (less than a slap on the wrist), confessed, in court records I believe, that Epstein belonged to Intelligence. Trump made Acosta his labor secretary, which he might not have if Acosta had thrown the book at Epstein. Acosta is a Floridian, and Bondi was the Attorney General of Florida too, where Epstein lived too. Yet, this week, she claimed she did not know whether Epstein was working for U.S. Intelligence (includes the FBI). She's sinning.

It is such a sad / shameful thing where Bondi reports as a Christian while she covers for devils all across her country. Not just one devil, but many. She's growing horns. God's directive to be obedient to your boss doesn't include loyalty to a cover-up of this criminal magnitude. Trump, and others in league with him on this matter, are forcing Bondi to be the devil's advocate. She should openly reveal which operators are seeking to control her in this way, but with Trump not assisting her, she feels that her life would be in danger if she stands up to fight this criminal syndicate.

There had been a question as to why Trump nominated her as his DoJ chief? Not being one to shy away from a conspiracy theory, I even wondered whether she had somehow facilitated the Epstein ring such that the deep state asked Trump to elevate her to that position, another Bill Barr, we could say. But I dropped that theory when she, as Trump's AG, went far beyond, with her words, what Trump would have wanted her to say on the Epstein issue. She was even telling people gleefully that Trump wanted Epstein exposed in hopes of driving Trump to that mindset. That's how I read her.

Bondi said that Trump directed her to reveal Epstein files. Trump was only trying to fool his voters into thinking he was delivering on his promises, but as Bondi spoke well beyond what she knew Trump really wanted, it makes her appear sincere in wanting the Epstein data out. She was trying to prod the president, who suddenly became an oak stump that could not be budged. That's how I read her.

Trump's home in New York is near Epstein's home in New York. Trump's home in Florida is near Epstein's home in Florida. Trump had said, in his younger years, that he appreciates Epstein's night life, similar to his own. In all likelihood, Trump knew Epstein to be an Intelligence operator in those years. That's why he couldn't allow Bondi to answer the reporter's question without his stubby interjection first, warning her not to answer the question.

Where's Epstein's bank records, jail records, tax records, court records, home records, work records, etc.? The voters want to see how he was guilty with high-level people. Now that he's proclaimed dead, there are no privacy issues to use as an excuse not to reveal the records. If it defames and incriminates the CIA under previous presidents, so be it. The people want the CIA exposed fully because it's integral to the shadow government that robs their treasury to the tune of thousands of billions of dollars.

Some Republicans are now shining, because they are willing to see Trump go down in the polls for the sake of genuine concerns. That's what I like to see. But the callous and obstinate Ben Shapiro, a pro-Israel Jew, sides with Trump, which is one way to confirm that Epstein was with Israeli Intelligence.

We now have Bill Barr and Chris Wray all over again, in different suits, do-nothings. On the same day as Trump's blunder, Fox had a story, supposedly leaked, wherein Patel is said to be investigating Comey and Brennan...which to me looks like Patel deflecting from the Epstein scandal, and giving pro-Trump zombies hope in the midst of hopelessness. There are many podcaster-zombies refusing to do a story on this latest round of the Epstein cover-up. They don't want to soil Trump with this story, to risk his political downfall to the demented Democrats. Ya-but the alternative is to give the country to a wicked deep state without a fight. Trump is willing to give the country to the deep state; he exposed that in his first term, predicting that he'd once again feign an anti-deep-state position in his 2024 election campaign. Sure, he's anti-deep-state when it attacks him, otherwise the deep state is as good as his friend if he and they can come to a deal.

Trump's U-turn on Epstein transparency comes not many weeks after Musk threatened to reveal Trump's spot(s) on the "Epstein files." Musk didn't make the threat openly, but between his words. Musk is jumping on the Epstein scandal as of early this week. He's using it to push his new political party. Candace Owens is asking Musk to reveal how he knows that Trump is in the files? Where's the proof?

Glenn Beck is being ridiculous for asking for Bondi's resignation due to her DoJ not catching the missing minute of the jailhouse video. He also ventures to claim that there's nothing nefarious about the missing minute, which is a thing one should not even suggest. Patel and Bongino were trying to sell this video to the public several days before its release, and so: why is Beck not asking for Patel's resignation?

In my opinion, they should all resign because they all-three know they are lying, and if they can't take the heat without being honest, get out. Honesty is always the best policy. The problem is, Trump the evil joker will just put in another Bill Barr and another Chris Wray. Therefore, Trump is the problem. Beck and others may not want to portray him that way for fear of losing viewership and/or the $$$ that comes with it.

Trump scolded the reporter (New York Post) on the 24-hour period when Netanyahu was coming to Washington. It could seem that Israel was begging Trump to get the Epstein news off the White-House agenda, because Israel is expected to be the prime shaker in Epstein spy services. Whatever the motive or motivation, Trump is doing Netanyahu's will. Is Trump still wanting in on Gaza beachfront?

Bondi's innocence can be seen before three minutes in here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqH5DfMXkyU

Bondi wanted to get the whole truth out, but someone made her those Phase One binders in preparation for MAGA consumption, and the person(s) responsible for the binders is part of the guilty parties, obviously. The guilt is in trying to fool the voter base into praising Trump for Epstein revelations. Instead, they set Bondi up to look like a fink digging her own grave. They were checking to see how little they needed to offer MAGA on this criminal issue, starting with the smallest nothing-burger possible.

Trump was obviously involved in this binder trial balloon, either allowing it to go forward, or being its instigator at the requests/demands of his invisible bosses. It is unthinkable that the binders would be given to the public without Trump's nod.

The binders had been prepared before the podcasters arrived to the White House, and someone, not likely Bondi, had planned on giving the binders to these podcasters. The latter were scheduled from a week earlier for a meeting on that day. They were invited to the White House, not by Bondi, but by the Trump's news team. Somebody set those podcasters up to make for a celebration on public camera, to cheer Trump for keeping his election promise to the flock, WHAT A JOKE.

GOLDEN TRUMP TRASH, FOOL'S GOLD. After nobody in his flock celebrated the binders, Trump just turned true to his dark colors and said to his flock: no more Epstein, just shut up about him. Say what? But you are the country's top cop, and you want nothing done about a massive crime ring? What kind of snake oil are you?

Even into Friday of this week, Megyn Kelly was lambasting Bondi, as if Kelly is unable to figure out that the binders were NOT her idea, that the Trump team, with Trump's nod, directed her to hand them out. Kelly is trying to steer Trump's base away from blaming Trump. On Friday, Kelly scolded Bondi (not to her face) for not keeping her "mouth shut," when running ahead of Trump, to say that much Epstein data was about to come out. That was her will, Ms. Kelly Bimbo, and she wanted to do what was right in spite of knowing that Trump didn't want it.

On her own accord, she was on the high wire for the truth, doing a balancing act between right and wrong, but Kelly is pushing her to her death by portraying her on the wrong side just because she was flirting with opposing Trump's will. Kelly is looking very bad in my eyes for other reasons on this issue.

The Trump team has made Bondi look like a bimbo, but it's her fault for playing along in spite of being a Christian who should know much better than to play with Hell's fire. Shame, Pam. Get out and snitch on Trump while leaving, because he's bragged about being transparent. So, be transparent, tell us straight how he's forbidden you from making the needed and justified arrests. Or, forever be portrayed as the White House's bimbo, because, as things now stand, the White House, with Kelly's help, has caused you to take the blame for the 180-degree turn that Trump wanted. Loyalty to fool's gold doesn't look good on anyone.

Not long ago, Bondi appeared on Jesse Watters. When he asked her if the country will see the information on the recordings that Epstein did in the rooms of his houses, she deflected, not answering the question, meaning that, even then, she knew Trump didn't want her to reveal the people on the recordings. Her DoJ has all the court data of Epstein's Florida case, but she has mentioned none of it likely for fear of Trump. She's been playing along with Trump to a degree, but we have yet to see the final outcome, whether she'll grow stronger in his nest, or fly the coop a respected bird.

Just because a client list made by Epstein doesn't exist is no reason not to show the truck-load of FBI files to the people. Bondi herself told the people that the FBI in New York promptly delivered a truck-load of files to Kash Patel, immediately after Trump made a bimbo of her on the news. Trump's made her a bimbo in a pin-ball machine, bumped fast and dizzily all over the place. Bondi needs to make a plan, announce that she's exposing the whole truckload, knowing she'll get fired. She needs to go out with fireworks. RESPECT.

There's no use getting on Patel's case, because Trump wants him to SHUT UP. Patel has decided to be loyal to this nasty piece of trash. Patel has decided to be Chris Wray, a smug, do-nothing, spit-in-your-face. This is the horror that pro-Trumpers feared, another four years of being played. I don't see Patel having the morality to sacrifice his new-found political status for "mere" truth. Some are saying they respect Patel, but as he came out punching the conspiracy theorists he once stood with, this guy is a hard-core traitor. There may be more hope for Bongino because he's more popular and therefore has a bigger backlash coming. That reality might straighten him out.

Trump needs to scold Patel: "are you still talking about Comey and Brennan, those creeps. They've been talked about for years." Instead, we get the following headline on Thursday: "Trump Celebrates as FBI Opens Revenge Probe Into Comey and Brennan." But wait, Trump, there's the Texas flood victims to talk about in the news, and are those two guys still talking about Obama's Intelligence?

So long as it's got him in the news, he's for it. So long as it's against his personal enemies, Trump's good with it. But Epstein steals news time from him, and helps others while endangering himself. Who's he in danger from? Those who did wrong with Epstein. He'll therefore protect men as bad or worse as Comey and Brennan while celebrating FBI / DOJ persecution of the two. But I doubt he'll allow the prosecution of the two. We'll soon see.

Liz Wheeler in the video above is being ridiculous not to see that Bondi has been manipulated by Trump. She's trying to portray Bondi as a click-baiter seeking fame when promising the goods. When Bondi revealed over a meal that there are tens of thousands of videos incriminating many people, she showed her willingness to get the truth out. But it's Trump who blocked her. Wheeler, I reckon, doesn't want to blame Trump because it could cost her many subscribers. To the contrary, it'll probably cost her viewers if she doesn't set the blame square on Trump.

Trump's not blocking only the Epstein crimes, but I'll predict he's going to block the arrest of FBI assets involved with January-6 crimes. The most Wheeler accuses Trump of, above, is he's "not listening." When I got to the video above, the first three comments were:

Revolts on Trump’s AG?!?!!? Why not revolt on Trump!??? I’m so sick of this

So liz wheeler acts as if Pam Bondi is solely to blame for the Epstein debacle? What a tone deaf take on the situation.

She will hold everyone accountable except for Trump. She is a grifter.

The audience at that Breaking Point youtube channel is expected to be half liberal, but I think that half of MAGA feels the same way, prepared to stab Trump over his theatrical performance in the news conference with Bondi, and to keep stabbing if he doesn't alter course.

Now that there's no longer any doubt that Trump lied to get elected, and that he's protecting high-level pedophiles, how can Christians such as Marjory Greene continue to say that they "love" Trump while passionately opposing the cover-up? She said that this week. Don't you think it's time already for Christians to go cold on him? Isn't it obvious that he's a political whore who's first line of success is the lie?

Musk is becoming the good guy, shortly after he became the bad guy by opposing Trump with what looked like a tantrum. Musk is pounding Trump with Epstein's club. They say that his new party has no chance, but if he can get 15 percent of the voters due to Trump's duplicity and the lunacy in the Democrat party, it can quickly go to 30 percent i.e. a three-way tie.

The more I listen to Glenn Beck on Epstein, the more he gets Trump-friendly, even saying he doesn't want any Epstein-related to go public. That's spoken like a jackass. He had Bill O'Reilly on his show when he said that, who told him he doesn't want any Epstein-related names to go public because it destroys innocent people. Ya-but, jackass, that's called a cover-up. If you say you want no names to protect the innocent, you also protect the guilty. O'Reilly said he cautioned Trump, a few weeks ago, on releasing names involved with Epstein. O'Reilly said that Trump had the same frame of mind. It suggests to me that Fox-news people were Epstein-involved whom O'Reilly knows.

O'Reilly seemingly revealed that Trump's using the excuse of keeping the innocent safe for not revealing the flight logs. Bondi promised names on the flight logs. In court, a pilot(s) of Epstein's plane claimed that Trump was on that plane. See that? O'Reilly is trying to convince the public that his argument is justified and paramount, and that Trump's base should relent in their attack on Trump's DoJ. SPIT!

Some people on Epstein's plane or island were totally innocent, we may assume, but the task of investigating all of them is that of the FBI, and the job of revealing the dangerous ones to the public is that of Pam Bondi. If O'Reilly's argument is not to tarnish the innocent with blanket release of information, then where are the revelations from the DoJ of the known guilty parties? Surely, the files easily fish out the guilty parties. Why doesn't O'Reilly argue for the DoJ to begin with those revelations??? Sean Spicer (former Trump press spokesman) is talking just like O'Reilly this week. Anyone who talks this way looks guilty of cover-up, no matter how craftily the argument is made. Not one arrest yet? How is that not a criminal enterprise in itself? To protect child-abuse criminals is a crime of the highest order.

Everytime the DoJ makes an arrest, it risks tarnishing an innocent person publicly. No judge says that such a thing cannot be done due to the risks to that person.

Ezra Levant, owner of Rebel News, a Jew, had Joel Pollak (could be a Jewish surname) on his show to talk about Epstein's death. Pollak downplayed Epstein to a nothing-burger degree such that Trump would want to congratulate him for being like-minded. The point is, Epstein was almost-certainly working for Israeli's cesspool, and Levant is a Jew. Is he trying to help Israel here? Of all possible guests on this matter, Levant chooses someone (Pollak) who says Alan Dershowitz (Epstein's former lawyer) is his friend. It's a bad look for Rebel News. Pollak even says that Patel and Bongino are telling the truth on Epstein.

Some would say that I'm being too harsh on Trump, because he's doing a lot of good things. I'm not buying that line, because he's doing what his base wants done lest he loose the congress. He gets no credit for doing the good he promised to do, in order to get the job, because he's just doing his duty. One deserves praise only when going beyond his duty, free of charge. Clearly, Trump is not going beyond his duty when merely giving appearances of keeping his election promises.

Therefore, give credit to where credit is due, his base, for reversing immigration policies, down-sizing government, stifling trans-faggot movements, and for January-6 pardons, and give credit to Trump for tariff chaos, NATO build-up, flirting with WW3, another do-nothing DoJ, and letting high-level pedophiles go free, none of which were the ideas of his base.

The Epstein story has grown larger all-week long, and I thank Dan Bongino the most. His fast betrayal of his own words was so fast, and so big, that every non-political person understands how bad Trump is at the moment. It would be understood better if some Christian podcasters would refrain from being Trump fans. Charlie Kirk, for example, seems to love Trump more this week than ever. It's more than perplexing to me, it's obscene.

On Friday morning, Fox had a story that looks like a false-flag operation by the FBI to change the Epstein subject. Apparently, the FBI arranged a man to shoot a gun at ICE agents, and, rather than local police being involved, it's the FBI at the center of the hunt for the shooter. It looks like a little good PR for the FBI amid a terrible week. While I'll admit that it could be a real event, the timing is suspect.

Why did Trump say a nice thing about Ghislaine Maxwell after she was arrested. Red flag. Instead, he should have celebrated the arrest, but never did. RED FLAG.

Bongino Not Happy

On Friday, reports surfaced that Bongino was on the edge of quitting the FBI due to a claim by others of his disagreement with Pam Bondi. Everyone's guessing as to what the disagreement has been. It could be disinformation. He may have been upset with her for one thing or another, but if he quits, it could be due to something else. I doubt he'd be a big suck and quit over a petty disagreement. It needs to be substantial, but as far as the public has seen anything from Bondi, there hasn't been anything substantial. First she was doing Trump's will to announce a release of files, then she did Trump's will to shut the Epstein case down.

The only justifiable reason for quitting is that Bondi has refused to be transparent, and has moreover for implied that Epstein is basically a lone wolf, not involved criminally with people. But, blame Trump. I'll even go so far as to suggest that God opened a window to let Trump condemn himself as the killer of Epstein transparency when he interrupted Bondi at the press conference.

A possibility is that the chief of White House staff has decided to target Bondi to salvage Trump. Another possibility is that Bongino is upset with Kash Patel for staying true to the kill-transparency policy.

No matter how the podcasters cut things in laying the blame, Trump knows the buck stops with him. If the base is upset with Bondi, it puts pressure on him to be fully transparent through her. Bondi has not appeared publicly since Trump interrupted her (as of Friday evening). Trump has said nothing publicly since. He's listening to the wrong advisors, not unusual.

I understand that podcasters don't want to lose Trump's grace, because he turns on anyone who attacks him. No surprise. And so the podcasters are wrongly pounding on Bondi hoping to keep in Trump's graces. It's outrageous. At least they shouldn't pound on Bondi until such time that she reveals herself substantially upon Trump's anti-transparent train. Instead of pounding on her, just say, "I'm very unhappy with Trump's shutting the Epstein case." It's risky, but some podcasters are doing it anyway, without apologies.

The worst enemy of Trump's base, right now, may be the podcasters calling for Bondi's resignation, because, while she may yet be a good guy, she could get replaced by a bad guy. Bongino will then need to suck it up. On the other hand, Fox news had a two-minute Friday-night story on the Bongino-Bondi gripe where it concluded that Bondi's not leaving her job. If true, it tends to reveal that she's sticking to Trump's wishes, and so, if true, she needs to be pounded. Pound away. Or, maybe this is a very-temporary misjudgment on her part, and she'll come to her senses before the week-end is out.

Trump now has loyalists running the CIA, FBI, military and DoJ, yet he's afraid to go after the deep state even with all of that. DISTURBING TRASH. His base worked hard to get here thinking he was on-board to clean the swamp. His base gave him a second chance after giving him the benefit of the doubt for his first-term blunder. Now his base is realizing that Trump always wanted to see the day when he could betray his base "real good," because he despises them. But I thought that day would come after his base helps him to secure the Congress in 2026. He may be too sick of his base to wait that long. He may be too sick of acting as though he loves them. Maybe he just can't do it anymore. Maybe it's time for God to land calamities upon his life for his deceptions conducted with great ego on his face.

Bondi's chief deputy, Todd Blanche, sent the public a massage apparently intended to dig into Bongino, by saying that both Bongino and Patel signed-off on the infamous memo that declared the Epstein case closed. There we see Patel willing to go down the deep-state cliff in order to keep his job, and Bongino apparently agreed with the memo for the sake of keeping peace, but not sincerely. Such a decision is tempting because one can convince self it's to do some good afterward by making a sacrifice now. The problem is, there's not going to be opportunities to do the good that needs to be done when Trump is acting the traitor to the country by allowing the heart of the shadow government to keep ticking as usual. They may as well become bimbos in the way Bondi was forced to present herself publicly.

Blanche was Trump's former lawyer, another New York attorney prior to that, and was even a prosecutor in the Suothern District of New York, which, if I recall correctly, arrested Epstein at the time he was killed there. One should consider whether the deep state ordered Epstein's arrest and murder due to his becoming too risky, or too independent (free-wheeling), to keep alive.

Blanche can be considered Trump's personal spy on Bondi's thinking and directions. She is likely aware of that, and so she needs to do walk on eggs shells lest she do anything that offends Trump. Obama would operate in this way, to appoint spies all over his government in order to keep control. The shadow government works that way, of course. What a demonic mess.

Therefore, as of Friday night, Blanche and Trump are likely running the crush-Epstein mill, with Bondi obedient for the time being. She could change her mind at any time. If she doesn't, then she needs to be pounded.

Try not to click Democrat videos on this topic, or youtube will stack you (75-percent or more) with leftist videos for days to come (in canada, anyway). Leftists are defined as people with no moral compass. They can be for or against the same thing, day to day, depending on the political need. Power is all they want because they have a social agenda to engineer society in an anti-Christ, lunatic way. They become masters at sounding normal when seeking to get into power, meaning they confess they know what's normal, and so they have no excuse before God for pushing abnormalities when they get into power. You don't want any part of that.

On Sunday, Trump released a long tweet, though it may all be from his tweet writer. He, as usual, spent more time telling about how he's doing such a great job for the country, than anything else. But he did, once again, play down the importance of the Epstein ring. This time, he's trying to convince his base that they are listening to conspiracy theories mainly from leftists brainwashed by Obama. That strategy just goes to show what a bimbo Trump is, if he thinks his base is going to be fooled by such an argument. The bad news is, Trump's sticking to his guns to make Epstein go away. The good news is, he's now openly revealed it. The war against him starts now.

Solar Heat Not Kinetic Heat

I've made the points below before, but would like to again, because I'd like someone with clout to spread these ideas around, because they are some ingenious realities of the solar system. I'm going to serve evidence that solar gravity is sourced from electrons, a negative force. Permit me to call evolutionists "goofs" because it's a nice, low-letter word that suits them well.

I'm going to contest their theory that the solar wind consists of free electrons escaping the sun due to their achieving escape velocity. I'm going to show why the speed they claim for the solar wind is bogus. google AI is saying (when copying Wikipedia) that the solar wind "typically ranges from 250 to 750 kilometers per second (km/s)...When [coronal mass ejections] occur, the solar wind speed can increase dramatically, sometimes exceeding 1000 km/s..."

I suppose the goofs arrive to their velocity figures by measuring how much time it takes for solar events to send their electrons to earth's detection equipment. As they say the sun is 150,000,000 kilometers away, they must be able to detect the electrons of a mass ejection 150,000 seconds (1.7 days) after they see one in a telescope, when they decide that the ejection's electrons are travelling at 1,000 kilometers per second. And when they think that a solar event takes twice as long to reach the earth, they clock that particular part of the solar wind at 500 kilometers per second. The goofs are forced to make their conclusions in this way because they are missing the realities.

One reality they are missing is that they have no mechanism in play to accelerate the electrons. When they envision particles escaping the sun due to fast speeds, those speeds don't accelerate in space. The goofs thus assume that the speed of the wind at earth was also the speed at the sun, and everything inbetween.

We read: "The escape velocity from the Sun's surface is approximately 617.5 km/s (1,380,000 mph). This is the speed an object needs to attain to break free from the Sun's gravitational pull and escape into space." Yet the goofs claim that solar-wind particles break free from solar gravity at much slower speeds than that. How do they justify themselves.

Besides, they cannot know what the escape velocity is because they do not know what the sun's mass is. Their escape velocity figure is based on the sun's mass. They wrongly guess at the sun's mass by figuring out the gravity force needed of keeping planets in orbit at their current orbital speeds. The math in that exercise involves the mass of the planets and their distances from the sun. But they err when they define total planetary gravity as the gravity force from each atom combined in each planet, wherefore their math will lead them wrong. They therefore cannot know the escape velocity at the sun, not until they know the specific gravity force at the sun.

They have the specific gravity force of each planet proportional to the average mass of each planet, but as gravity is not from some graviton particles within atoms, specific gravity force is not proportional to planetary mass. It's that simple. The goofs insist on having the wrong gravity mechanism. They seek to discover the mass of the planets by a combination of orbital speeds, distances from the sun, and specific solar gravity force. In their thinking, they cannot find the mass of planets unless they first know the average mass of the sun, but the thinking is wrong because solar gravity force is not from atomic solar mass. It means they also have wrong planetary-mass figures.

On top of having the wrong solar escape-velocity figure, the principle of escape velocity is not needed to explain the formation of the solar wind because there is an alternative method: electron repulsion. Duh. And it's not as though the goofballs don't know that electrons repel each other. So, what's their problem that they can't tell you that electrons push each other way from the sun? Why are they afraid of this simple and logical thing?

The explosive activity in the sun continually knocks electrons off of hydrogen atoms, and those atoms continually seek to reload with some of them, naturally. The principle is like unto solar panels, where, so long as sunlight strikes the solar panels, their atoms see their electrons bouncing up and away such that the atoms remain positively charged. But when the sun stops shining, the atoms fully reload with electrons, becoming neutral in charge. On the solar surface, hydrogen atoms are always positively charged, therefore. The atoms thus attract electrons that go free in the commotion, yet the commotion keeps knocking off the electrons. Continually. It's just a no-brainer, a fact.

The problem is: how can electrons stream away from the sun if hydrogen atoms attract them? This problem is the solution-in-waiting for explaining why there's a solar wind.

The greatest number of electrons will go free in a solar ejection because its got the most explosive forces, the most bang-bang commotion. There is extreme kineticism (bang-bang) going on at the sun. The atoms are in chaos while colliding with each other. But heat is not defined as this commotion. Heat is defined as the freed electrons, but only if the electrons go permanently free. As long as they are captured by protons, there's no heat. As long as they are captured, they can't get into any other material to produce heat within them. So long as they are captured, they are only STORED heat. In the commotion, healthy solar atoms flirt with releasing heat, but never can because they attract the bounced-off electrons back to themselves. If this were all that is going on at the sun, the earth would freeze. The earth needs to be bathed with solar-wind electrons.

The more they go free from atoms, the denser the electrons are, the harder they repel each other, and the faster they go outward toward earth. No escape velocity is needed because there is a constant release of electrons into space that pushes away those previously released. It's a simple "river" of electrons going forth in all directions from the sun. The question is: how do they get free of positively-charged solar atoms. If the sun is positively charged, the electrons can't escape. Therefore, we learn this one thing: the sun is net-negative in charge. We therefore need to find a way to explain it. I see only one way.

I guarantee you that, when the goofs claim many more bare protons in the solar wind than free electrons, they are feeding us disinformation. Especially because they view a hydrogen atom as one proton per one orbiting electron, they are required to posit that the solar wind consists mainly of hydrogen atoms, for if they claim that bare protons can escape the sun, so they must posit that full hydrogen atoms escape. Why not? It's unavoidable if bare protons escape by the mechanism of escape velocity. What are we going to conclude, that solar commotion can knock away bare protons, but not whole atoms? Ludicrous.

But it gets worse for these goofs because bare protons naturally attract free electrons. Thus, if bare protons do sail away from the sun with free electrons, they are expected to reload with electrons before they leave the solar atmosphere, where they are together the most dense (the further they get from the sun, the less dense they become). As they do not claim that hydrogen atoms define the bulk of the solar wind, that's how you can know they lie when claiming that the solar wind is mainly bare protons.

I would like to know their reasoning for deciding why they have more bare protons than electrons in the wind. I know for a fact they have not detected bare protons with equipment, because bare protons simply cannot exist. They would instantly reload with electrons no matter where they may be. You can't find bare protons in the earth's atmosphere, because the air is filled with free electrons, and so what goofball would claim that bare protons can exist a "few" miles above the solar surface such that they escape the sun in the bare condition, and remain bare all the way to earth? LIARS. It can't happen.

I do declare: they invented protons in the solar wind to deflect from the fact that this wind is defined exclusively as free electrons, heat material. When NASA first discovered electrons in the solar wind, scientists naturally claimed that there were half protons and half electrons within it. But that can be recognized merely a theory, not because NASA's equipment detected bare protons. It was a theory based on their erroneous view that one H atom is one proton and one electron. Thus, they were led to falsely think that, for every one electron in the solar wind, there must be a bare proton too. GOOFERS, that can't happen. But the very invention of bare protons in the wind proves that they did detect free electrons in the wind.

In those days, and probably to this day, they claim falsely that protons cannot be destroyed. Therefore, they cannot conceive of free electrons in the wind apart from some bare protons. They cannot conceive free electrons going free from the sun without also the protons; otherwise the protons would accumulate in the sun. That's why they invented protons in the wind.

But even according to their definition of hydrogen atoms, it is unthinkable that there should be significantly more bare protons in the wind than free electrons. Yet that's what they have google AI telling the world right now. ??? If four or five times the protons are in the wind as compared to electrons, then the sun must be keeping from most of the electrons from these protons trapped at the sun, unable to escape. The sun would then become net-negative in charge, which is my belief, by the way.

Ahh, but now we can understand why they claim that the solar wind has many more protons than electrons, because they have concluded that the sun is net-negative in charge. As they think that protons cannot be destroyed, they conclude that the only way to have a net-negative sun is by way of losing more protons than electrons. Ya-but, stupids, if this situation were going on for millions of years, or even thousands, the sun would become so extremely net-negative that no proton could escape.

And this is their problem for those who proposed that protons flee the sun's gravity by achieving escape velocity. They now need to add to this picture that a negative sun is going to pull protons such that they need more than escape velocity to permanently escape. Plus, the goofs now do admit that the solar wind accelerates from the sun, which is expected when electrons repel each other away. Speeds of particles get ever faster because repulsion force always exists in their midst.

They now claim that whole atoms do escape from the sun, but this is impossible because the solar gravity attracts all whole atoms. They must insist that whole atoms achieve escape velocity, but this is not not possible.

We now get to their dilemma, for they are loath to admit that the sun is negatively charged, because that condition allows electrons to escape on negative force alone, no escape velocity needed, and moreover it prevents bare protons from escaping. I'll claim that they "secretly" know the sun to be negatively charged. That is, some solar experts make that claim, but it's suppressed by others because someone could get the impression that the sun's negative charge is the true definition of solar gravity. A negatively-charged sun will attract all atoms, wherefore negative charge can be construed as gravity force. A negatively-charged sun will make all of its atoms positively charged. Can you grasp that? On top of that mechanism, the commotion of solar atoms keeps them all positively charged. Yet the sun maintains a negative charge. Can you see how so? By destruction of protons, the mystery solved.

Repeat: the fact that google AI claims the solar wind to have four to five times more protons than electrons proves that some solar experts see the sun negatively charged. I read with my own eyes, some weeks ago, from google AI, that the wind has something like four times as many protons. But, just now, I asked google, "are there more protons in the solar wind than electrons?" The response is: "No, the solar wind contains roughly equal numbers of protons and electrons." Therefore, there is disagreement on the make-up of the solar wind. The latter claim is based purely on theory as per the make-up of the H atom as they see it, one proton per one electron. This is not science, but a pet theory.

I've just asked google if the sun is negatively charged:

No, the Sun is not negatively charged. It has a slight positive charge. This is due to the fact that electrons, being lighter than protons, are more easily ejected from the Sun in the solar wind, leaving behind a net positive charge. While the Sun is overwhelmingly neutral due to the balance between positive and negative charges, the slight imbalance results in a net positive charge.

You see, some of them are loath to admit that the sun is negatively charged. They are merely guessing that it's positive based on their reasoning that electrons are more easily ejected by escape velocity, thus disregarding their escape by their inter-repulsion forces.

No matter what force level there may exist to propel solar particles outward, the lighter (or less massive) those particles, the faster they are propelled away. The force of your arm can propel a golf ball higher and faster than a cannon ball. Therefore, if bare protons are achieving escape velocity, the goofs cannot argue that much-less-massive electrons are remaining at the sun. However, I read with my own eyes that the solar wind is about 80-percent bare protons and less than 20-percent free electrons.

Bare protons repel each other too, and they would indeed repel each other into space if they did exist at the sun, but it is impossible for them to exist in the solar atmosphere, wherefore it is impossible for them to exist in the solar wind...unless they are partially or wholly destroyed, having no/little positive charge. Destroyed protons would be pushed away, by the outgoing electron steam, as cosmic "dust."

Destroyed protons is the only way to explain the flow of free electrons as the solar wind. Constantly-destroyed protons predicts a constant negatively-charged sun even while electrons constantly get away. Free electrons are constantly produced when solar atoms have their protons constantly destroyed or partially destroyed.

In reality, a hydrogen atom is covered in an electron atmosphere i.e. of many electrons. The idea that it has one electron is trash. Anyone claiming that an H atom can attract only one electron is unworthy to be a scientist.

Can you imagine a magnet attracting just one iron filing when you immerse the magnet into a sea of iron filings? To think that one iron filing alone goes into orbit around the magnet is why you can regard modern physicists as complete morons. A proton pulling an electron is not going to cause the electron to go into orbit, only a complete moron thinks so. Atomic physics is filled with morons.

A proton will load with electrons until the outgoing negative charge from its full compliment of electrons equals the outgoing positive force from the proton. At that point, there is a net-neutral charge going outward, for which reason it can no longer attract electrons. The atom can only grow so large, and no larger. It's size is confined by how strong the proton's positive charge happens to be, minus some size when some electrons get pushed off by gravity force. Gravity is a negative force that pushes some electrons off in spite of protonic attraction seeking to keep them on.

Once protons lose positive force, their electrons are free-in-the-clear to escape the sun. And the only thing needed for escape is their inter-repulsion forces. Gravity can't hold the electrons to the sun because gravity repels them, duh. If gravity can't hold them to the sun, no escape velocity is needed to set them free, duh. The morons have crippled their science by refusing to see gravity as a negative force.

A moron is someone who receives the truth but constantly rejects it. A moron is someone who sees the truth at the tip of their nose, but constantly rejects it in favor of something else. If people are ignorant of a truth, they do not qualify as morons. But scientists know that negative force is an option for gravity force, yet they they have rejected it to this day even though they can see it active in solar-wind electrons. The sun does not attract them, duh.

If you wish to resist my definition of solar gravity as the abundance of free electrons in the sun, be my guest. But you cannot argue against the expected fact that electrons repel each other from the sun, if escape velocity is not the reality. There is no other conceivable option. Electrons repel each other toward earth. They enter earth's atmosphere as heat. They warm the moon. This is what the goofs don't want you to know. They want you to believe that heat is the bang-banging around of atoms. Why? Because they are morons who keep to ideas that the law of physics disallows.

A physicist knows that objects undergoing collisions slow down because their energy is absorbed into each other, resulting in slower speeds. The energy doesn't get destroyed, but gets used up to slow the colliding objects. But this same physicist imagines that atoms colliding zillions of times per second never slow down. This goofball thinks that this bang-banging around of atoms results in temperature. The faster they bang around, the hotter they are. LAW-BREAKING DELINQUENTS. Get rid of them.

In reality, temperature goes up with a greater density of free electrons. The greater the density outside of an object, the greater is the potential to enter the object's atomic spaces to heat it up, because electrons motivate each other by their repulsion forces. Free electrons are the ancient "caloric" that the morons rejected, existing right at the tips of their noses, right between their self-blinded eyes.

These electrons are sourced mainly in the sun, but the science establishment is governed by law breakers who fabricate another fantasy when saying that solar electrons cannot enter the earth's atmosphere. I suspect only one reason for this fantasy: the adherents to the big-bang theory don't want people to realize that free electrons in the air represent the heat of the air. They don't want us thinking that solar-wind electrons bring heat from the sun.

? They confine solar heat to radiant energy only, from light waves only. But that's not the whole source of solar heat. It physically enters the air too. It's a physical material too. The light waves travel across the free-electron aether that is the solar wind. The morons rejected the aether at about the time they rejected caloric material. The scientists who pushed caloric were not morons because electrons were not yet discovered in those days, and nobody yet knew that the sun was spewing them. But what's the excuse of modern morons? The caloricists were onto the reality, but the up-coming evolutionists shut them down.

They got away with fantasies because they have convinced the people that they really do know what they are talking about. One fantasy is that the earth's "magnetic field" causes solar electrons to pass by the earth high above the atmosphere. Oh really? How can a magnet cause electrons to pass by it? I don't know. It's not logical. The goofs fool us by focusing on "magnetic field lines." They want us to imagine these lines abducting solar electrons in lines to the sides of the planet, after which they flow away from the planet, deeper into space from the sun. google AI includes the fantasy of a "magnetosphere":

Earth's magnetic field, or magnetosphere, is crucial in deflecting and guiding solar electrons, preventing them from directly hitting Earth's surface. The magnetosphere acts as a shield, trapping some particles in the Van Allen radiation belts while directing others towards the poles, where they can interact with the atmosphere to create auroras.

The air prevents the solar electrons from striking the ground. The air is the shield, but they do crash into the air, and mix into it. There is no such thing as a magnetosphere high above the earth, just as there is no such thing as a magnetic condition ABOVE an ordinary magnet that doesn't exist more powerfully ever-nearer to the magnet. Whatever magnetism there is high above the atmosphere not only exists within the atmosphere, but is more powerful there.

Why should a magnet cause electrons to pass by it? I see no explanation. It's a fantasy. But as solar gravity repels solar electrons, so we can expect earth gravity to repel solar electrons. When? When they come near enough to earth gravity. Obviously, if earth gravity repelled away solar electrons before they crashed into the air, the earth would freeze.

In their definition of heat, incoming solar heat cannot escape into space, because their definition of heat transfer is from atom to atom. But as there are no solar atoms / particles above the air on the nightside of the planet, there cannot be heat escape into space there, according to their theory of heat. In that case, the earth would have fried long ago. But I do have a fact on how solar heat escapes by night, because earth gravity repels free electrons into space. It's a fact because there is no alternative theory for explaining needed heat loss.

Someone placed the earth at exactly the right distance from the sun to allow a balance of heat gain versus heat loss. Something in the earth repels atmospheric electrons away, and when we follow logic rather than law breakers, we realize that free electrons in the planet is what repels them. We then realize that the heat in the earth is what repels atmospheric electrons, and we therefore get our first inkling that earth gravity is defined as interior free electrons. We are discovering that something in the planet destroys/cripples protons.

Someone needed to create just the right amount of heat in the planet's interior such that it repels away as much heat as the sun brings in. Heat repels heat equally in all directions, and gravity force repels it upward only. Atmospheric electrons would spread each other equally in all directions but that gravity repels them simultaneously upward.

As the Arctic is warmer in both summer and winter than the Antarctic, it's possible that the north pole has a positive charge attracting solar electrons. There is no evidence I know of to prove that the south pole of earth is magnetic. That is, there's no evidence that the earth is a magnet. If it's not, then out the window goes the claim that earth's field lines abduct solar electrons.

There is proof that the south pole is not magnetic where a compass needle, when south of the equator, points as far downward as possible, toward the ground, because it's trying to point to the north pole. In other words, there is no attraction of the needle to the south pole, only to the north pole. Only consequentially (not due to attraction) does the other end of the needle point south. The liars know this to be true, but they feel the need enough to claim that the earth abducts solar electrons such that they fabricate an earth magnet with two poles.

It's clear to me why the goofs don't want to declare that gravity repels electrons, for star formation from the big-bang fantasy cannot take place unless gravity pools in space attract electrons and protons together such that they acquire the possibility of bonding into atoms. But they cannot explain how gravity pools form to begin with. They just invent them on paper.

In their own theory of gravity, they need accumulation of protons to form a gravity pool, yet protons repel each other and will not come together in pools. They think that protons harbor a gravity force each, wherefore they need a pool of protons or full atoms in order to form a gravity pool that then goes on to form a star.

They have the additional problem of gas atoms known to move away from each other, more powerfully the hotter the gas, which situation is not conducive to forming a star. The fantasizers need to form a gravity pool, you see, to explain how atoms can be pulled toward each other that otherwise seek to get away from each other i.e. spread out into space. But they can't have the gravity pool unless atoms are first pulled together into a pool. They know they have this chicken-egg problem, but they don't want you to know.

There is nothing in a big-bang explosion that predicts the formation of atomic pools. Instead, an explosion of particles causes the particles to move constantly MORE FURTHER apart. Big problem there. The particles move eight times further apart each time they double the distance from the point of explosion. VERY BIG PROBLEM. How many times will the particles double the distance, from the explosion point, after just one million years? Haha, morons. The impossibility of star formation is right at their noses. It doesn't matter if they say that big-bang particles spin and therefore go forth on random curves paths, because the fact yet is: eight times less dense for every doubling of distance.

If the protons / atoms don't attract each other by their innate gravity force when near to the explosion point, they will not when further from the explosion point. But the big-bang criminal wants the big bang as badly as he wants God dead, and will create a big-bang "reality" if it's the last thing he does. The big-banger has this motivation. God considers him a criminal, and will lock him up. Crime is defined as doing harm to others.

NEWS

Tucker on the front lines of appropriate Epstein and Fox-news bashing. However, in this video, Tucker says something suspicious, that there's not likely any Epstein client list, hmm:
https://www.youtube.com

It doesn't matter whether Epstein had a list, or took pains not to make a list in case it was found by the wrong people. What matters is that the DoJ makes a client list from all that's known of Epstein and his associates. That's what the people want, a list of guilty parties, exposing what crimes they are guilty of, though it's much better that the DoJ makes the arrests before revealing those people as part of Epstein crimes. If a list is released before arrests are made, many people will flee a country as soon as they see the first arrests.

Trump doesn't want to be pained by making those arrests, and thus doesn't want to give his base the red meat that is a DoJ list of guilty parties. That's it. That's the whole story. Trump is a wipe-out, a traitor, and fraud. End of story. He has the choice of pretending again that he'll go after the deep state, and this is probably why the FBI announced an investigation on Comey and Brennan, because these two characters keep Trump in the news in a way that Trump loves to be in the news.

Something is very unstable about Tucker Carlson, because, although he now acknowledges that Building 7 was taken down by the government, he revealed, not many days ago when interviewing Clayton Morris, that he thinks Osama bin-Laden took down the Trade Center. For me, this is the definition of a cracked pot. It's damaging when a man is a good and trusted speaker yet holds critical, false ideas that get conveyed in the midst of acceptable ideas. Why doesn't he want to take the obvious, true position that 9-11 was an inside job? It was abused as an excuse for Middle-East war, which he opposes. 9-11 is a starting point for proving a wicked deep state in the CIA, FBI and military. It goes to the FBI chief, Robert Mueller, and his buddy, James Comey. They covered for that crime.

---

NEXT UPDATE

Here's all four Gospels wrapped into one story.

For Some Prophetic Proof for Jesus as the Predicted Son of God.
Also, you might like this related video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3EjmxJYHvM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efl7EpwmYUs

Pre-Tribulation Preparation for a Post-Tribulation Rapture

---