Wow, a new kind of hot drink, in case you're tired of coffee and tea daily. Pour about a quarter cup of peach juice, after eating canned / jarred peaches, and the rest in boiled water. Soothing-good.

I'm going to treat the video below to show how some Christians are twisting themselves with foolish and toxic notions. In the first few seconds, the fool opens with the claim that people who take positions like Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson are necessarily "anti-Jewish."

Jesus called anti-Christ Jews the "synagogue of satan." The fool is therefore REQUIRED to call Jesus an anti-Semite, and the fool now needs to explain why he hasn't portrayed Jews as Jesus does. The fool has nothing to say, once you confront him with the Biblical facts, yet the fool doesn't know when to stop rambling.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ud6t_OfHtNo

There's a big difference between anti-Israeli positions from Arabs, and those of us who understand the evil and ignorance of Jesus-rejecting Jews. The Arabs want Israel vanished, some even with brute war, but we don't wish harm to Jews or Israelites. BIG DIFFERENCE. The fool would like to lump us in with anti-Zionist Arabs so that we don't derail Zionism as it now seeks to spread into Syria.

Nobody's going to derail God's Zionism, but man's Zionism is a different animal, clearly. It is true that Jews can consider themselves superior by the fact that God called them, in Old Testament times, to consider Gentiles as second-class, unholy people. The same still applies today: God views gentiles as unholy people. They are the ones now supporting man's Zionism, with bombs, along with some Christians who should know better. Rather than being excited fans of mortal Israel, we should sit this out as troubled onlookers until God culminates with the terror of fulfilled prophecy.

I guarantee the fool in the video above: Jesus is not excitedly cheering for Netanyahu's programs, as are some Christians. But, after Israel's great tribulation, Jesus will assist the Remnant militarily, until it sends the surrounding Arab nations reeling. Some Christian Zionists are suggesting that Netanyahu's incursions beyond the Israeli borders is the fulfillment of that post-tribulation expansion. It's as though Zionist Christians have no knowledge at all of the great tribulation of Israel, as if they have never read the Bible. It's perplexing. They are literally cheering, and urging us to cheer, Israel's war victories. But I see a looming cloud over Israel, nothing to cheer about.

The fool in the video is a typical blind bat. I agree that Israel has the right to defend itself against Hamas, but there is evidence that Netanyahu's military decided to allow Hamas to kills some Israeli's back in October of 2023, as an excuse to invade Gaza. In any case, whatever was Israel's failure to spy out Hamas' small invasion before it happened or got deep, Candace Owens and others are in opposition to Netanyahu's handling of Gazans thereafter, because it was a brutal, murderous campaign not justified by the "few" Israelis who were reported dead in that October battle. And, Israel likely increased the number of dead, and the atrocities, by sheer fabrication, propaganda.

I don't know, maybe it was God's will to crush Gazans, it's possible, but I think we need to give Candace and others a better shake than to call them anti-Semites just because they are aghast at Israel's treatment of Gazans. It could be that God Himself finds Netanyahu hideous for green-lighting that rampage.

If the fool in the video above can't come to terms with the Gazan war as brutality, that's why he's a blind bat. It means he has no footing to lecture the world on this topic. As you can see, he stresses the hostages, as a means to attack Candace, because he doesn't want to focus on the atrocities in Gaza. Not even his viewers found the hostages discussion worthy of thumbs-up. Therefore, the blind bat wants to keep his viewers blind to the atrocities.

I think that, lacking God's will for Gaza at this time, we Christians should play it safe and value the lives of ordinary Gazans, some of whom are Christians. There's twice as many Arab Christians in Israel as Israelite Christians. I think it's a no-brainer that, should Israel gets rid of the Arab threat, when it no longer needs support from Christians to fight the Arabs, Israel will turn with some brutality on Christians. Then what will these fools say who, at this time, wish for us to view modern Israel as the apple of God's eye?

Israel in concept is the apple of God's eye. Israel in concept is the wife of God. Israel in concept becomes a reality only when the Israelites worship God sincerely. But I think that MOST modern Israelites don't even worship with lip service. In the United States, Jews have traditionally served the anti-Christ Democrats. It's a clue to Christian Zionists that something is deeply wrong with the Israeli lobby in the United States. But, no matter, they wish to be blind. No matter that it offends Jesus, Christian Zionists speak Heavenly of the Jews.

The United States has supported Israel for its own interests, not because American governments wanted to see God's prophecy fulfilled, DUH. There's lots of Rothschilian animals in the United States with eye$ for Middle-East profits, duh. And are we as Christians supposed to support this picture? Some Christian youth would even be coaxed to die in Middle-East wars for this picture. It has nothing to do with God's Israel. Make a distinction.

If your church were filled one-quarter with typical, average Israelis, your church would be stabbed to death by Mr. Chaos and Mr. Division.

I'm not a Candace Owen fan. She has her own blindness for being a Catholic. I'm stressing the anti-Candace fools who now wish to stamp out all social-media people who would tell a more realistic picture about Israel. However, it is true that genuine, anti-Semite social-media players are chiming in with gross opposition to Israel.

The fool in the video says that Israel is better than Gaza because "Israel is a MORAL democratic state." Achem.

Could Zionists become so blind that they cease to watch prophetic fulfillment? Is this partly why Jesus implored Christians to "watch"? He did so in the midst of describing the "great tribulation" of Israel (Matthew 25:15-31, and He said that it will be the fulfillment of all the wrath of God, against Israel, spoken by the prophets. Are Christian Zionists going to neglect that part of the Message?

In my opinion, the "elect" of Matthew 24:22 are both the Christians who endure the great tribulation in Israel, and the Remnant chosen by God to become Christians during/after the tribulation: "And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened." The days are not going to be shortened to something less than 1260 days, which is the new idea of so-called "pre-wrathers," a demented idea. These quasi-post-Tribbers have this idea that God made a mistake telling us there will be such a 1260-day period, but will later change His mind "for the sake of the Elect." No, but rather, those days will be shortened to 1260 days.

By the way, I'm not calling the man above a fool in the sense of "raca," but am using the term simply to denote a foolish approach that refuses to understand those who are not at all keen on modern Israel. Most "conspiracy theorists" believe that Israel was behind Jeffrey Epstein's blackmailing programs. The romanticizing over Israel needs to cease. We can be benign toward her on account of Abraham, but let's not become infatuated until God filters out the bad from the Chosen.

So-called "replacement theology" is heresy according to pre-tribbers. They will argue with righteous indignation that God did NOT replace Israel with the Church. Technically, that's correct, because the Church was the continuation of Israel, under a New Covenant, and if anyone disputes that, that one is the true heresy-pusher. They will argue wrongly that Israel and the Church are two separate groups, though, technically, they are correct again, because the Church is Israel while Israel has become a thing of condemnation. Pre-tribbers want you to think that there are two holy groups, but Jesus made it plain that unbelieving Israel is unholy, not of God. In the end times, God will choose some of the unholy Israelites, and add them as first-fruits to Israel. Jesus is the King of Israel, not of bloodline Israel, but rather he's the King of Christians.

For all we may be permitted to know at present, God may have judged Israel worthy of desolation by war because Israelis are delighting in the desolation of Gaza by war. I expect that, for God to clear His name for what He will do to Israel, He will expose Israeli persecution upon Israeli Christians, at which time He will shut the mouths of pre-trib Zionists who see with one eye only, missing half the picture.

Let's put it this way, that if we want to justify modern Israel taking back the ancient property of God, then the citizens of modern Israel are required to worship Him. As this has not been the case, this modern Israel, an imposter, will be destroyed; it's people will go into exile in foreign lands, if they are lucky to survive the Desolation of the Beast. For those who return , God will assure that they worship Him. When's the last time you heard a Christian Zionist talk this way? Where are the Christian podcasters, who cheerily cover the Israeli war machine, who talk that way? I don't hear them talk about it at all. It's as if they want their viewers ignorant of, or blind to, the coming great tribulation. They don't want to face the sins of modern Israel; they don't want viewers to think that God is dismayed with her, because they want viewers to cheer the Israeli war machine, as if they are happy that a Godless Israel is safer. But, Jesus said, "Don't fear those who kill the body but are not able to kill the soul; rather, fear him who is able to destroy both soul and body in hell." Safety starts with worship of God, the placing of the heart and mind on Him, not done ritualistically, forced at set times, to try and be goodie-goodies, but naturally, as it occurs truly, when our minds are stayed on Him.

It is not wrong for Israelites to be in Israel. It is wrong for them to be in Israel while trespassing God's will for Israelites. He's not asking much: honor your King. It doesn't cost a penny to worship God. The Arabs are sinning who wish to wipe Israelites out of Israel. Yet the Israelis are unworthy of this land, and Westernism pollutes it with "democracy," the will of the people. No, not the will of the people be done, but the will of God be done who knows what's best for the people.

One: delight in your God, Jesus of the Cross. Two: delight in your God, Jesus of the Resurrection. Only then will Israel be blessed. Western society is not a blessed thing. It is a machine run by the rich. Trump is of the rich, and they love what they can have from the machine. The Kingdom of God is not for them.

When the Bible says that we should bless Abraham, founder of Israel, the understanding is an Israel under Godhood. You can't imagine God asking us to bless an Israel that loves Westernism but not God. When one blesses God, food tastes better. The sky feels brighter. Time has more value. Sleep has more peace. Waking has more power. Fears have more courage. Depressions have more hope The mind's thoughts are more meaningful. The heart touches God. TRUE RICHES, ABUNDANCE.

This week, with Trump blocking Israel's strikes on Iran, Israel is turning to weaken the "West Bank" (of the Jordan river). According to Isaiah 10, the anti-Christ will come to Jerusalem through the West Bank. Trump assured that Iran will not become as weak as it otherwise may have had he not committed Israel to peace with Iran. Trump's peace with Iran is like his clobbering you with a club, and watching you go into a coma.

Those who oppose replacement theology do so by pointing out that not all of the Old Testament prophecies are fulfilled in the Church. But nobody holding to this theology should make that claim. Still, it is true that the promise of restoration for Israel, at Armageddon, is a Church thing, absolutely, and this is what pre-tribbers and others miss. What can't they understand about the Remnant becoming a part of the Church? Why are they stumbling blind over that Rock? Why are they banging their heads in vain upon that Rock? Do they view the "Church" as the gentile churches only? It wasn't that way from the start. The Church was almost fully Jewish to begin with. When Gentiles entered it, it was the true Israel of God. When the Remnant enters it, it will still be the one-and-only Israel.

I've got to say that my brothers who reject "replacement theology" are completely stupid, but it gets worse when they try to trick us with words. First of all, it's not replacement, but rather healing of the old. God didn't replace Israel, but gave her healing in Jesus. When Jesus is seen dying for the sins of Israel, in Isaiah 53, it's not Jesus dying for the Church that is something other than Israel. A person needs to be real dumb, or worse, not to understand Paul when defining a Jew as a Christian Jew only, where he's claiming that the Church is the Israel of God.

This group of nasties who condemn "replacement theology" are guilty of promising another Israel that will never be. Modern Israel will NEVER rule the world. The Remnant is not modern Israel. The Lord will REPLACE modern Israel with the Remnant of modern Israel, but this is not to be viewed as an extension of modern Israel, but rather as its annihilation. The remnant will be honoring Jesus, and washing her sins away in His Name. It's not going to look anything like modern Israel; it's going to rule the nations only by the powers of Jesus.

There are some people telling that there will be no rapture at all when they go against pre-tribulationism. But even Jesus has the rapture in Matthew 24:30-31. Paul learned, though he didn't tell where from, that the rapture is a transformation of human bodies to "immortal" ones. Jesus and Paul put its timing at Armageddon, suggesting that the threat to human life will be so dire and worldwide that it necessitates removing Christians from off the ground into the safety of the sky. It clearly shows that God is not wishing that we all die for Jesus' sake.

I assume that the Israeli Remnant will continue on earth in human bodies. This is the restoration of Israel, where the world falls under the government of Jesus for 1,000 years, to show the angels and the immortal saints the difference between a Godly world versus one infested with demons and people obedient to, or swayed by, them. How great do you imagine the contrast will be? What would life on earth be like with zero demons to infest human minds? I would suggest, GLORIOUS. We Christians are called to suffer patiently on this earth until God's exposure of demon-led humanity is ended. Find innocent things to do, and help God to expose the evil. Keep clean in our endurance.

"Zionism" is a deceptive term. It speaks to God's promise to restore Israel, with Zion, in the south of walled Jerusalem, as its capital. But Zionism is not a Godly movement, but is purely political in the style of British Westernism. Worse, it was founded by Rothschild bankers who no doubt profited in many ways, first by selling land to settlers. These are the same Rothschilds who were secretly behind European globalism, yet they also infested the United States with their corporatism, which is why many people have come to despise Jews as money-grubbing, business fiends who care nothing for the customers they exploit. Not all Jews are like that, yet many are influenced by being entrapped within it. Some pick up the same methods for their small businesses, but I don't become anti-Jewish on account of it, for there are business scums in all nationalities.

The video below counters those who say that Israelites descend from ancient Israelites:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v6alUNArZAQ

I wouldn't define "Jewish" Ashkenazi as those who descend from Biblical Ashkenaz. After seeing the video above, one might start to think that God's Remnant will be true Israelites wholly or predominantly, with significant Israeli blood. I assume that Ben Shapiro has done a DNA test, and that he didn't advertise what the result was. He looks European to me.

The video owner above thinks that Noah lived in Africa because he had elephants and giraffes on the ark. But the world was warmer before the Flood, at least partly due to being lower in elevation than today. Geologists have said that the average depth of sedimentary rock, which was formed by the Flood, is about a mile deep. Imagine how much warmer it would be with an extra mile of air above you right now. Talk about a greenhouse effect. It would have been warmer for working, yes, but there would also be thicker oxygen for making you stronger to endure the higher heat. The sun would have looked a little less bright by day, and more reddish at dusk. Chickens probably flew like crows back then. Fires would have burned hotter/brighter. Boiling point would have been hotter. Oxygen would have reached deeper into soils for better root growth. Water tension on lake surfaces would have been more tense. Wind would have been slower but more forceful. Elephants and giraffes could have survived in the Middle-East.

Love

Love can be defined as doing something you enjoy doing. I love flying. I love ice cream. And so when God created life, he created it to be loved. What animal doesn't value life so much that they run from danger? What animal doesn't regard it as horror when about to be eaten? The God of love created animals eating animals, how to explain? Yet, we have the overwhelming sense that God created life to be loved, a loving act. The number-one definition of God ought to be: Giver of Life, Taker of Life. The better the life, the worse the death.

Anti-Christs twist their arguments such that it makes God look evil, but, generally, people see God as good for granting life. And so what anti-Christs did was to announce that there is no God. That way, he won't get credit for granting life. And they devised a new way for life to possibly arise without Him.

God pierced Himself with countless griefs when He gave life to the human "species." He did it, however, for love of what could be, if only mankind could be trained correctly. History, and the Bible, is that trainer. Life is centrally about this training, but nobody wants to talk about it. Instead, pro-Trumpers want to talk economy, and the love of the American dream. Democrats want to talk about nothing else but pounding Republicans to death, as usual, because they love obtaining political power so that they can stick it to Christianity with all sorts of blasphemies in their faces.

I've never understood how people could betray God for the love of fornication or money. What else could there be to cause that betrayal? Nobody's going to betray God for love of ice-cream, or love of life. But there is a major problem with life, when God gives unlovable things to man as his reward for betraying Him. Weeds and gnats are only the beginning. The curse of weeds includes the sweat of producing foods, explaining why God didn't create food trees and plants all over the place as numerous as weeds.

How many curses of God are there in life by which we could hate God? This is the harsh reality, that while God gave us good things, He also gave evil as recompense for disrespecting Him. He decreed that rains should continue that we may eat. And He decreed that the high number of food choices should remain. He decreed that the foods will yet taste great. He decreed that the sun will shine in beautiful skies on the evil and the good together. He shows us promise. He decreed reminders of His love for our love of life, on His world stage, in His Training Ground. If we refuse to be trained, He can become hard or harsh against us.

In His wisdom, He must have concluded that, without the curses, we would never be correctly trained. Without the threat of punishments, we would just go forward in our lusts (similar to love) while disregarding Him. He's clearly not willing to grant us lovely things while disregarding Him. He's not that "understanding." He could shrug off our hatred for Him, while continuing to grant things we value, as if it were just a little thing for us to disregard Him, but that situation is unsustainable because, obviously, He gets offended. He's "human."

Therefore, with so many people, this past generation, who latched onto the evolutionist's view of God, how many Curses do we expect? After seeing the ills of society grow large this past generation, people who've maintained respect for God are wishing for Him to get rid of the human weeds, because these thorny creatures will not become reasonable, because they will not cease their anti-God programs. They are stenching up the world, promising persecution for those who respect God, and blaming the ills of society on them. What is there to love in societal life, with a human condition like that?

God loves a humanity stayed on Him. Such a humanity will reap more blessings instead of curses. Why can't the anti-Christs see it? Why isn't this in the headlines instead of trust in Trump to save things? Are you kidding me, Trump to save the world? What a grand mirage. Snap out of it. Besides, Trump is a futurist.

Trump and Musk got along partly because they are both futurists. At least Musk warns of the dangers of AI and skinchip technology. But that's not enough. It's necessary for good men to warn against rejection of God in the progression to a Godless futurism. Neither Trump nor Musk are good for doing that. Can anyone imagine God advocating robots in our daily lives, both at work and at home? This is Musk.

The only hope the anti-Christs have in keeping zeal in their supporters is a bright, futurist "utopia," and the continuation of a sex-sinful society. Love of liberal fornication is the driver of the anti-Christ movement. They raise weeds as children, conditioned to despise Christians. Futurism is for them, their glistening toy. But even a child will despise a toy eventually, and wish for another. Why? Because it's only entertainment, and we cannot be entertained with the same thing over and over again. Infatuation with robots will quickly evaporate. I don't have that infatuation to begin with. Anything that's part of replacing God is a non-starter for me. I'm loyal to hoping in the Day when the curses are removed; I want to be there. Why can't anti-Christ's have that attitude? Why are they so self-destructive?

Revelation Locusts

More and more, I've been getting the impression that God wrote some Revelation symbolism to be heraldically deciphered. I realize what a dangerous-for-me claim this is, and I know that even a non-Christian would think it outlandish. But I got to thinking this morning about "Abaddon" in the 5th Trumpet, the Hebrew version of the Greek Apollo, the mythical character. He comes out of a fiery furnace in the deep hole in the ground after a star hits the ground, which I think is a nuclear blast.

I started this morning with my belief that Apollo named Poland. I then sought an Abaddon-like entity, and came to the German city of Baden recalling that Casimirs use a red antler as a bend, with nothing else on the Coat, thus matching the same-colored (both colors) bend that is the entire Arms of Baden. Casimir of Poland married Maria of the Kiev VARANGians, and the VERINGers of Baden are known to have used TRIPLE red antlers, suspect by me as part-code for TRYPILLians on the Kiev area. German Trips once showed boots suspect with th Budini of the Kiev area.

You can load Casimirs now, which load on another tab, in order to load other surnames, to better follow the heraldic links. The Casimir write-up: "The surname Casimir was first found in Polesie, the largest province of Poland. It is inhabited by Ruthenians, called Polesians, of Ukrainian descent."

Kiev is the capital of Ukraine, and the Russians are becoming very upset with Europe due to it's abuse of Ukraine to weaken the Russian military. Soon, all that Russia will have to defend itself from the West is nuclear bombs if this keeps up. The Varangians of Kiev are the co-founders of Moscow, you see. And the Zahringers of Baden kin of Veringers who used triple-blue antlers instead, founded Bern with a BEAR symbol, suggesting that Russia got its bear symbol from Zahringers there.

Zerrs/ZEHRers use an axe in Crest while the Baden/Battin surname, first known in Somerset with an Axe river, use "BATTLE-axes"" and a "HUMan eye." HUME's are first known in bear-depicted Berwickshire with Battle's. It makes the latter look like Baden elements under discussion. Battle's have a giant griffin, and the House of Griffin in Pomerania was at least associated with the Mieszko Poles from which Casimir descended.

Humans (beside Somerset) are listed with Yeomans having "spear CRONels" while Spears/SPEYers, first known in Renfrewshire with Polock-like Pollocks, take us to the Spey river, location of Peter Pollock's castle at Rothes. I trace Crone's to the Ceraunii Illyrians whom I assume were named as per the Ceraunii mountain near Apollonia. The ATINTanes were at those mountains, and then Tints are first known in Somerset with Badens/Battins, suggesting that Hebrew, Abaddon elements were at Apollonia. I think that Epirus was named by Hebrews who named Abruzzo.

While Royals share a red bend with the Arms of Baden, TINTons have "royal tents." Tintons are said to have been in Somerset. Tints use a "COUCHant lion" while Couch's (Arms-of-Baden colors) use a bear, suggesting Zahringer elements in Somerset. Neighboring Devon has the bear-using Beers/Bears and Berrys, and the first-known Yeo's/Yeomans in Tinton colors and format. Couch's are first known in Oxfordshire with Abaddon-like Abotts.

Couch's are suspect with the Gouch variation of Googe's, the latter first known in Roxburghshire, named by the Roxolani who lived south of Kiev along with Budini. Googe's share the boar of POLsons/Pole's, first known in Caithness with Scottish Andrews, in turn suspect from king Andrew I, who was in exile in Kiev soon before he became a king (1046). Andrew birthed George, father of the Drummonds, and German Drummonds are first known in Hamburg with the German Trips now showing shoes. Shoe's use an axe and a knight while Knights are first known in Suffolk with an Eye location suspect with the eye of axe-using Badens/Battins/Baddons.

HAMburgs share the crosslets of English Trips who in turn use "scaling LADDERs" suspect by me as part-code for LOTHARingia, home of Richeza, mother of Casimir of Poland under discussion. HAMs are first known in Sussex with Baden-line Keeps, from Kiev elements. Letters/LAUDERs (giant griffin) use a "goose" while Gouch's/Googe's are also Goose's. Goose-using Gas', in Lauder colors and format, are first known in Hamburg with Trips while English Trips have ladders. Letter-branch Lauders have a "RePULLulat" motto term while Pulls share a Pole variation with Polsons (share Gouch/Googe/Goose boar).

Pulls/Pole's are first known in Dorset (beside Badens of Somerset) with Chaffs sharing the Battle griffin, and with Chaffinch's sharing a giant and black dog with Furnace's. Up until now, I haven't shown heraldry that can connect to Apollo of the giant PIT having smoke like that of a furnace, yet Pits are first known in Dorset too, and Pulls/Pole's look like "Apollo." We are now beside the Tints suspect from Atintanes at the Apollonia theater.

Furness' (Lancashire with Parrs) share the black border with Parrs who in turn hare the fesse of Hind-related Parrys. The Ceraunii-like Crauns/Crane's have a "hind ducally GORGEd" (with CROWN) in Crest. English George's are first known in Dorset, beside hind-using Perrys, first known in Hampshire with Sturs, Buttons/Bodins, and Abott-like Botters/Bodens expected from the Budini. Parrys are first known in Wales with Parrots who share the pears of Abaddon-like Abotts.

Dorset (location of Stur-related Stour river) is beside the first-known Stars of Wiltshire, where Shoe-beloved Tree's are first known who share the knight with Shoe's. A star fell to earth and created the giant pit. Stars share the eye with the neighboring Badens/Battins. I met Christine Peare while I was selling shoes, and while Peare's are first known in Oxfordshire with Abotts, Pero's use "flaming stars."

Apollo's/Apollonio's/Poloni's have a "green TREE" to go with the "green oak tree" of Roets, first known in Somerset with Oaks and Badens/Baddons and Baths. Bath of Somerset is near Clapton while Claptons share the patee cross of Rush-connectable Crauns/Crane's expected from the Ceraunii mountains at Apollonia.

Pit-branch Petts use "BULrushes" while Rush's have fessewise annulets linkable to the same (different colors) of Bulls/Bule's, the latter first known in Somerset with Tints. The fessewise annulets of Rush's are in colors reversed with Ceraunii-like Crauns/Crane's The Atintanes of the Ceraunii-mountain area were on the same river as ancient BULLis, and there is a Bullis/Bulliard surname (stars), first known in Wiltshire too.

Bullis was also "Byllis," making Billets/Billiards and similar terms suspect from Bullis. English Bills are first known in Somerset with Tints. Blythe's are first known in Berwickshire with Lauders and bear-using Berwicks.

Likewise first known in Berwickshire were Aytons (look related to Baths) while EYtons (Shropshire with Bats) have a version of the bear-using English Balcomb Coat, itself a version of the bear-using Bern Coat. Bats share black bats with Baden-like Batons.

The Bat Caucasians are suspect to mythical Batia, wife of mythical Dardanus, symbol of Dardania in Mysia, beside Abaddon-like Abydos. Apollo was chief of the mythical, all-female Muses suspect as code for Mysians, land of Amazons, and as Apollo's twin sister was an Amazon, we expect Apollo likewise. Mythical Amazons were all-female portrayed. Amazons originated, according to Herodotus, at Trabzon and Rize, which is near the Caucasian Bats of Batumi, the latter in Colchis. Apollonius wrote a myth tracing Colchians to the islands on the east side of Istria.

Whatever nationality Apollo represented to Greek myth writers, he's expected from Colchians / Amazons. His mother was Leto while Letters are linkable to Letts/Late's (note "RepulluLAT" of Lauders). The latter are first known in Gloucestershire with HUMans/Yeomans while Hume's are first known in Berwickshire with Letters. The "tuaRUS" motto term of Letters can be both for Tuareg Amazons and Rush elements.

We now go to the giant LOZENGE of Fauci's because Losinj is an island in what were once the Colchian islands above, and then Fauchys (not "Fauci") have a giant "grasshopper." I don't know of any heraldic locusts, and so I suppose that grasshoppers will do. Abaddon is represented with locusts that come out of the smoke of the giant furnace. Fauci's are first known in Genova with Segurana's who in turn share the eagle of Italian Este's while English Este's are first known in Essex with Easters/Asters/Sturs/ISTERs (share SMOKE/Rauch bend), both suspect from Istria. The latter surname almost has the Arms of Baden. Easters/Asters/Isters' have the SMOKE/Rauch bend in colors reversed while Roach's look connectable to Calles' and Shute's, both first known in Wiltshire with Stars (beside BATH), and even with Hoppers expected in the grasshopper.

The Letter goose is on a rock, and Roach's use the rock too. The heraldic rock is code for Roxburgh ("AUdax") elements that were of Roquefeuil in Aude province, the proto-Rockefellers, we may safely assume. The Hatchets in the Zerr/Zehrer "hatchets" share the trefoils of English Rocks (same place as Rooks).

Thatchers/Thackers have the grassHOPPER too while Thackers/Thicks have "A bittern SETTLing in the reeds" showing bulrushes. Settle's share the LOZENGes of Stars, and Losinj is in the Colchian islands off of Istria. Settle's are first known in Lancashire with the Shettleworths who in turn share the "weaver's shuttle" with Keeps who in turn share the Arms of Baden.

Casimir of Poland was related to the Arms of Baden, and Pollocks once used their saltire in the colors of the similar cross that is the Arms of Pola/Pula, a city on Istria.

Apollo has a Smintheus cult after the mouse, and the Mieszko Poles are said to descend from mythical mouse tower. This cult was named after Smintheum, in the Troad along with Dardanus and Abydos, and Troy. Mythical king Priam of Troy was father of Paris, suspect as code for the city of Parium/Parion, in the Troad. I had found good evidence to decipher "Priam" with Biblical "Abram/Abraham." The latter had married Keturah after Sarah had died. This is how Hebrew elements could have named Abaddon as the alternative of "Apollo." I don't know of a mythical Abaddon outside of Revelation.

Abraham and Keturah had a son, Medan, traceable to mythical Medon of Athens, because his father was king KODRos, looking like "KETURah." Mythical HECATE, who must have name Hecuba, wife of Priam, and HECTor, her son, was the witch goddess of the Colchian witch, mythical MEDea. The latter married Jason of the Argo ship, and Apollonius of Rhodes (home of Helios, Medea's grandfather) wrote the Argonautica wherein Jason and Medea sailed to the Colchian islands off-shore from Istria. RHODopolis was in Colchis.

After Medea and Jason were divorced in Ceraunii-like Corinth, where they had been king and queen, she rode her chariot in the sky to Athens (near Argos), pulled by 12 dragons as possible code for the 12 tribes of Israel. It seems that she was part of the family of king Medon, suggesting the latter was Colchian yet traceable to Keturah's child with Abraham. Logic tells me that the end-times will be this dragon entity from Abraham versus the Promise to Abraham via Sarah's child.

Batumi is on the coast from Lake Sevan, where I trace Swans/Sweyne's, the latter first known in Lanarkshire with swan-using Locks who share a black and engrailed bend with Bats (though Locks are now said to be first in neighboring Peebles-shire). Locks are also locust-like Lokes'. The Lock saltire is in both colors of the Score saltire, and so here's from two updates ago, where you can ignore Bachs and Bakers:

Welsh Bachs can be shown to be a Baker/Backer branch where Bachs are first known in Denbighshire while Denbighs have a "SCORpion." Score's have a Coat in the format of Bakers/Backers. There is a Pion surname, in Schore colors and format, but I have no relevant comment. OH WAIT. In Revelation, there are locusts in the 5th Trumpet having stings like scorpion stings. They come out of a PIT, and then Pions list "Piot"! MOREOVER WOW, Pits are first known in Dorset with Palins who in turn share the Denbigh Chief!

That's the Trumpet having Apollo. The Bats lived from Batumi to POTI! Palins are first known beside the first-known Pots, Potters and Petts (share Pit stork) while the Ardens in the Pett motto share the Score cinquefoils. Poti was also called, "Phasis," and then Pasi- and Paisley-branch Packs love the Anchors in the giant Pion/Piot anchor! It's in Pasi colors, on a blue background, same as the Paisley and Pack anchors. Pasi's love the Spears/Speyers, first known in Renfrewshire with Paisleys and Pollocks. Pions/Piots are in Pool/Pull/Pole colors and format while Palins share the Polesdon stars, but see also Poltons. The latter two are first known in Cheshire with early Pace's. There is a Polish Pack surname. Spear-branch Spree's are first known in Cornwall with Score's and Bat-branch Batons/Bastons! SCOR-PION. Score's share the black saltire with Bats, and French Batons/Bastons are first known in POITou! It appears that God arranged these Caucasian elements to point to the Revelation locusts.

The Bats may have lived as far around the Black-sea corner as TREBizond, and so we can add that Trebys share the Pit besants. Polish Trabys/SADOWski's love the Scarfs who in turn share the triple wolf heads of Bathers, the latter first known in Denbigh! It's the Denbighs who have the only heraldic scorpion I know of.

I've always wanted to know what the Polish Sadowski's may have been a branch of, and here I find that Shade's/Schade's are first known in Baden. Shade's/Schade's share the Coat of French Moulins while Moline's/Moullins are first known in Devon with Trebys and Mule's.

SAIDs/Saddle's are interesting for having been first known at Everley (Wiltshire, beside Palins/Pawleys and Badens/Baddons) while Everleys share the green griffin of Powells who in turn share the giant Palin lion. Then, Wiltshire is where Stars are first known sharing the green lozenges of Saddle-like Settle's, and these lozenges are in the colors and format of the Everley griffins. Sattle's (share Seaton crescents) are first known in Baden! Satters/Satterthwaits are in Palin colors and format.

By the way, Satters/Satterthwaits (near Levins), sharing the Cary roses, are in Levin colors and format too while Leavells were at Castle Cary (Somerset). I trace these lines to Laevi Gauls on the Ticino/Tessin river of the Tess'/Tecks, and thus Tackers and similar terms are expected from the Ticino river with Pierro's/Pero's. The Bather wolf head is in giant form with Tackers/Tackleys while Thatchers/Tackers have the grasshopper! Tackers/Tackleys are first known in Oxfordshire with Peare-related and Abaddon-like Abotts.

It appears that my hunch is proving true, that God provided heraldry to point to the 5th Trumpet, and while Fauchys have the grasshopper too, Tony Fauci led the vaccine program that might yet provide the 666 system as a mandatory vaccine pass into stores and workplaces.

Fauci's share the lozenge of Irish Nagle's and Anchor-branch Angers, and Pions/Piots have a giant anchor in Tacker/Tackley colors and format. We might call the vaccine pass a DOOR PASS, and so it's interesting that while Tromps look related to the Shield of Fauci's, the latter are first known in Genova with Doria's who share the Tromp eagle. PASS'/Pascals use the Templar lamb as a potential pointer to the lamb's horns of the False Prophet, the 666 dictator. Trump/Tromps are in Tacker/Tackley colors and format.

It just so happens that the 5th Trumpet is a plague specifically against those, or so it's implied, who have the mark of the beast. For a graceful God to give people five months of torment like unto a scorpion sting, they have got to be very evil. If they still refuse to repent after that, their torment will be finalized without God's mercy.

The SatterTHWAITE location of Satters, in Hawkeshead (Wiltshire, beside Hawks), looks like a Satter marriage to Thwaits/Twitts, first known in Norfolk with Hawk-beloved Pilgrims. "Thwait" looks like "Taft," yet Thwaits/TWITTs are first known in Norfolk with Tute's/Tuits, kin of Tattons, the latter first known in Cheshire with Tafts. The latter share the "phoenix" with Knee's while Knee's share the stag head of Tromp-beloved Acorns. Norfolk is where grassHOPPER-using Grishams are first known. Trumpets are with Calles', first known in Wiltshire with Satterthwaite, and with HOPPERs/Happers, and while Elon Musk bought TWITTer, Musks/Muscats are first known in Cambridgeshire with Tacks/Thackerys while Thatchers/Thackers are first known in Essex with Muschats.

While Tafts/Tuffs' were a branch of TOUCH's/Tuffs, I touched the knee on the leg of Sleeping BEAUTY, fulfilled by Charlotte Hicks and Ainsley Earhardt. The latter said this week that the BIG BEAUTiful bill is a good thing, and Hicks-connectable Bigs share the Ainsley and Hicks fleur-de-lys. I've claimed that Trump was at the start of the dream, in bad shape, swallowed by a shark. Shark-line Sarasins share the Thatcher/Thacker moline. Bigs are first known in Essex with Low LEIGHton, a home of the Hicks, and Leightons/Leytons are first known beside the Leigh's/Leys with a leg-like Legh variation, and beside the Hicksons (same place as Thackers/Thicks) using eagle legs.

I'm not sure how else to comment here except to ask: will Musk swallow Trump? Bigs are first known in Essex with Muschats and Thatchers/Thackers. Twitt-connectable Satters/Satterthwaits are first known in Cumberland with Saracens. Thatchers/Thackers look like kin of Ainsley-branch Annas', first known in Cambridgeshire with Musks/Muscats and Tacks/Thackerys.

It's interesting that Tacks/Tackerys, pointable to locusts with Thatchers/Tackers, are first known in Cambridgeshire with Musks/Muscats of Ely. The Musk/Muscat Coat is in the colors and format of Elys and locust-like Lucas'. The Sola's in the Tack/Thackery motto are first known in Derbyshire with the Cherrys sharing the Lucas annulets. We can even add that while "loCUST" can get us to Custs, their Cast/Cash branch are first known in Cambridgeshire too, even with the Crabs suspect in the "cherub's head" of Tacks/Tackerys.

Crabs are also Crail, and then Botter-connectable Balcombs are first known in Crail. I'm referring to Italian Botters, first known in Lucas-like Lucca. Lucca's have a "cat" while Chatans share the Balcomb bend-with-roses, in the colors of the bend-with-star of Botters.

English Botters/Bodens are first known in Hampshire with Buttons/Budins sharing the fesse of Lucas', Tweens/Twins and Drake's. The latter's wyvern dragon is apparently in the Lucas Crest. The Lucas' use "a red fesse beTWEEN six red annulets", and Tacks/Thackerys have "a cherub's head proper beTWEEN two silver estoiles." Tweens/Twins have twin estoiles too, and Twine's are first known in Yorkshire with the Priestleys sharing the Lucas motto.

When I did heraldry on the pointer to the Apophis asteroid, which I entertained as the fulfillment of Revelation's 2nd Trumpet, I included the Crails/Crabs because I had read that this asteroid will become visible in the Cancer-the-crab nebula. Cancer-like Chaunceurs/Chance's share the patonce cross of Case's (Hampshire) while Casts/Cash's are also Cass' while Lucas' are also LuCASS'. The latter have a Coat version of the Musks/Muscats, first known in the same place as Crails/Crabs.

The Musk/Muscat Coat is in the format of, and colors reversed from, the Crab-like Cravens (Yorkshire with tack-connectable Tancreds) because Meschins married Skiptons of Craven. Grape's/Grabbers, sharing the Coat of Goats/Gothams (Nottinghamshire with Lucas') list a Craver variation. Then, Drake's love the Muscas', first known in Pisa, beside Lucca. We can even add the Luce's/LUCYs are first known in Norfolk with the Wheats in the "wheat SHEAVES" of Tacks/Thackerys (said to be a Tancred / Tankerville branch). The latter's eagle thus becomes suspect with the Arms of L'Aquila because Italian Sheaves' are first known there.

Ranulph le Meschin married LUCY Taillebois of Lincolnshire, where Tancred-branch Tankerville's are first known along with Cast/Cass-branch Custs. The TANERdevilla location of Tankerville's is suspect at the Tanaro river because it's roughly or exactly where Masci's are first known.

We can now go to "TanerDEVILLa" because Deville's/FONT-de-Ville's (Languedoc with Hugs) have a lion "waving a PURPLE FLAG" while Purple's and Flags/Flecks are first known in Norfolk with Fulke's, Luce's, and Hug-related Fonts/Fountains in the "fountains" of Casts/Cass' and Custs. Fulks of Anjou started with Fulk I, husband of Miss Loches', that being a locust-like term like "Lucas."

Anjou is in Angers while Angers almost have the Coat of PION-beloved Anchors. "ScorPION" needs the Score's sharing the saltire of locust-like Lokes'/Locks.

I can't say for certain that God arranged these heraldic links as pointers to one or two Revelation Trumpets, but then what good does it do to propose the possibility? Is he pointing to Elon Musk with Lucas'? Why are Elons first known in Berwickshire with Luke's/Looks/Lucks and Lucas- / Ely-connectable Blythe's? The latter have a version of the Lucas and Ely Coats while Blythe-like English Billets share the Coat of Bellows in the "bellows" of EEL-using and Skipton-like Shiptons. Musks were at Ely while Elys/Elle's may have named Elons/Ellems (or vice-versa) sharing the Coat of Ellems/Elms. But the last thing I want to do is point to someone, in relation to a Revelation plague, whom God is not pointing to.

Blythe's, a possible pointer to the Clinton crime rings, use crescents while Cressents/Crets are first known in Burgundy with Loches'/Locks, Loges' and French Saffers. Shiptons are first known in Oxfordshire with Clintons. The Pike's in the Luce Coat are first known in Devon with Billets, and with Sever-branch Saffers while Severs (Somerset with Elms) share the Lucas / Vita annulets. These English Saffers share a "Vita" motto term with Bellows. English Blois', perhaps using the Lucas dragon in colors reversed, are first known in Suffolk with Loge's/Lodge's, with their Dragon-loving Tresure kin (once said to be first known in Somerset), and with Goat-loving Kidds. Blows love the Goats too, first known in Nottinghamshire with Lucas'.

Tancreds happen to have this connection to Syria: "They were descended from Tancred, son of the Good Marqis, who governed the principality of ANTIOCH as Guardian of the Emperor Bohemond II. Tancred, whose barony was in Normandy in 912 A.D. was also the sire of the celebrated Tankervilles."

In my last update, I stressed SARDinians at Sant'ANTIOCO, named after Antioch of Syria (now in Turkey), and so let's add here that Tancreds are in Shirt/SHARD colors and format. The latter surname is first known in Cheshire with the Bello's who not only share the Tankerville cinquefoils, but can be in the "bello" motto term of Turks/Torks (Dumfries with Bellamy-branch Bells and Bullys). Bullis of Epirus was also Byllus while Bello's share a Billet Coat. Bullis'/Bulliards (beside Bulls/Bule's and Shirt-connectable Hosts) share the red roundels of Shirts/Shards.

German Bauds have a "bello" motto term while Scottish Bauds are first known in Stirlingshire with Guiscards. Royal Guiscards of the Sardinia theater descended from Tancred. Guiscards love the Pile's, first known in Somerset with Bulls/Bule's and bull-head Hosts.

Now is the time to say that Bullis in Epirus is suspect with the surname of the Seleucid king, Alexander Balas. Wikipedia's article on the Seleucid kings had their associations with the Thesprotian branch of Epirus. The article removed that bit. Some think that Balas was the son of Antiochus IV, conquerer of ancient Jerusalem.

The "frucTED" olive tree in the Tancred Crest can be part-code for the Tedd variation of Tudors (Tancred format and colors reversed), first known in Herefordshire with Sellicks. In the last update, Sellicks were shown tracable to Sulcis at Sant'Antioco. Tedds/Tudors share the helmet with German Helms while English Helms (look like Sale/Sallet kin) are first known in Surrey with Antioch-like Anticks. Shirts/Shards look like kin of Tiss' in their motto term, "HosTIS," and the Coat of Thissels looks related to the one of English Helms. Hermits, sharing the helmet of German Helms, are first known in Yorkshire with Tancreds.

Scottish Sheds (Tankerville cinquefoils?) use the "hermit". Tancreds of Tankersley are first known in Yorkshire with English Sheds/Scheds who share the potent cross with Crusader Jerusalem. The Tancred line in Antioch was a result of Crusader Jerusalem. The latter was ruled firstly by the house of Boulogne, the Arms of which shares red roundels with Shirts/Shards. The potent cross of Scheds is with Skate's/Sheets, first known in Norfolk with Antioco-connectable Antinghams (see last update for them), and with the Fulke's who sat on the throne of Crusader Jerusalem.

Sallets (same place as Shirts/Shards) are expected from the Salto river, location of Avezzano while Avezzano's are first known in Sardinia with Italian Amori's. Anticks have a giant parrot while Parrots use pears while Pears are first known in Oxfordshire with Amore's and Damorys/Amori's. The potent cross is also with BROCuffs, first known in Silesia with German Turks and Schitners, and while Parrots are first known in PemBROKE, Broke's/Brocks share the Chief-Shield colors of Brocuffs and Scottish Sheds. Broc is in Anjou.

Are the 2300 Days Set to Begin?

Al-Julani's New Syria made a deal with the Kurds, to share a part of Syria (Rojava) with them in return for oil rights from Kurdish Iraq. Kurdistan happens to blanket the ancient Seleucid kingdom, suggesting that the anti-Christ will defeat the Kurds, only to have the Kurds violate his fighters a few years later when he comes to his demise.

The New Syrian constitution is based on Sharia Law, however, which is not the religion of the Kurds. See a future problem there? The Sunni will begin to treat Syrian Kurds as foreigners when they have the military power to push Kurds out of the country. Julani is keeping quiet, not revealing what's on his mind. I don't know whether he'd be open to an invasion of Israel that includes Iranians, not necessarily with Iranian-government sanction, but the option is on his table because his country is too weak to do it alone. It would require a betrayal of Trump, yet Trump is the one who removed the sanctions against Syria with the understanding that Julani becomes friendly to Israel.

Late this week, Syria reveals it is willing to make an official peace with Israel if the latter gives up 2/3rds of the Golan Heights. The question is, what is Syria planning to do when Israel says, no way? It just so happens that president al-Julani named himself such after the Golan home of his parents:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3UHwdr9-Kn4

Daniel's admission in 11:37 that the anti-Christ won't worship any god but the god of war fruit begs how he'll become worshiped by jihadi-minded Muslims. Why does Daniel mention that he won't worship the desired god of women? How is this relevant to our identification of this man prior to his revelation? The verse reads: "Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all." I don't know of any Middle-Eastern "desire of women." It suggests that religious Muslims will join his attack on Israel in spite of his atheism.

As women tend to promote Mary worship in catholicism, my take on this verse has been, lightly, that the beast will be of catholic background but an insult to that cult. "God of his fathers" gives an impression of traditional catholicism too, though it can be Allah too. A typical atheistic secularist seems to fit the part of this "beast." Not many prophecy buffs speak about this atheistic mindset. This verse rebuts those who think the anti-Christ is coming as a fake-Jesus trickster. Prophecy has zero evidence toward that position.

Prophecy reveals his being staunchly anti-Israel and anti-Jesus. From Daniel 11:25-31, we learn of his being anti-Israel from well before the successful invasion of Jerusalem in verse 31. In Daniel 8, he's shown being anti-Israel for 2300 days, or so is the implication that he'll scratch and paw at Israel for that time period. Daniel 11:31 is the point where approximately 1260 days remain of those 2300 days, meaning that verse 21 starts prior to the 2300 days, for he isn't shown going against Israel until verse .

The problem is, most prophecy buffs are too blind to see that 21-31 pertain to the end-time anti-Christ. I'm disheartened by their being so blind; I suspect that blame goes to pre-trib prophecy writers who, for a long time, were by far the primary teachers on prophecy. Not anymore.

In order for the Apophis asteroid, of April 13, 2029, to be the 2nd Trumpet, I figure that 11:25 needs to come to pass by 2026. That verse is the anti-Christ's invasion on the "king of the south," which the Daniel text reveals as Egypt. At the aftermath of the victory over Egypt, he takes a stab at Israel. Assuming that this is the start of the 2300 days, and assuming it's in the spring of 2026, the enforced mark of the beast works out to 2300 - 1260 = 1040 days later, which lands us at the start of 2029, a few months before Apophis' scheduled arrival. My timing of the 2nd Trumpet is after the start of the 1260 days, but I see nothing in revelation to tell how much after the start of the 1260 days.

If the 1260 days begin at the start of 2029, Egypt needs to be invaded at/before the spring of 2026, if Apophis fulfills the 2nd Trumpet a few months after the start of the 1260 days. Does that seem doable at this time? No, but possible. The deeper into the 1260 days we locate the 2nd Trumpet, the earlier Egypt needs to be invaded from the beginning of 2026. The only way to get the invasion of Egypt past early 2026 is to assume that the invasion of Egypt is not at the start of the 2300 days, but a year or more after they begin.

Put it this way: the deeper into the 1260 days we locate the 2nd Trumpet, the earlier the 2300 days must begin. If we locate the 2nd Trump at the very start of the 2300 days, the invasion of Egypt needs to be no later than the spring of 2026. The only way to get the invasion later than 2026 is to locate the 2nd Trumpet a year or more before the 1260 days, though I haven't been prone to doing that because the 1st Bowl is on people having the mark while I have chosen to see that outset of the mark at the start of the 1260 days.

However, it is possible, and logical, to have an optional 666 system prior to the mandatory one at the start of the 1260 days. This allows the timing of the 1st Bowl and 2nd Trumpet earlier than the start of the 1260 days, and thus allows the invasion of Egypt beyond the spring of 2026.

With Apophis fulfilling the 2nd Trumpet, the 2300 days cannot begin before the invasion of Egypt, or that invasion would be happening now, at the latest. It is possible for things to start happening fast. It is possible for the 2300 days to begin at the start of 2026.

If Apophis of 2029 is not the 2nd Trumpet, then we are totally in the dark as per the start of the 2300 days. The 2nd Trumpet could be an as-yet undiscovered asteroid. Apophis was not discovered until 2004.

What possibly could trigger an invasion from northern Syria / Iraq into Egypt? How could such an invasion take place after the victories Israel has recently managed? What route would such an invasion take, by sea or by land? How could it get past Israeli land without defeating Israel first? Does it seem, at this time imminently, that Turkey would attack Egypt by sea, then depend on something like the Muslim Brotherhood to topple president el-Sisi? Daniel 11 says that people in the king's inner circle will topple him.

Turkey has always wanted to punish Israel for her suppression of Palestinians. Only, she is half allied with the West that won't tolerate Turkish actions against Israel, unless someone like Obama is in charge who sides with Palestinians. What last straw could make Turkey break from the West into a leading role against Israel? Are we just about at the last straw, yet? I'd be able to answer better if Ezekiel 38 or 39 revealed whether the Gog alliance is end-time Turkey versus Russia. It doesn't seem to reveal it. It can be either one. Though, better yet, it can be both.

When Russia saw that Assad's time had come to give up the war, Russia was prone to siding with Turkey and Julani in order to retain some influence in Syria, though not immediate influence. Russia needed to tread softly with the Julani government, sit back a little, but it knows it has a bargaining chip to speak of in its support against Israel should the Julani government desire it. And it probably does desire it, secretly. The best reason that a desperate Russia now has for going against Israel is to get pro-Israeli Western influence out of Turkey and Syria by committing both nations to emphasize the ruin of Israel. See that? It's a workable scenario for fulfilling prophecy. As Julani now spars with Israel over the Golan Heights, he might start to consider the whispers coming from Russia.

It's a workable scenario even with a Westerner as the anti-Christ. I see WEF, for example, as an anti-West, Western monster. WEF is the bacteria of Europe eating Europe's flesh. A WEF monster is now the NATO chief, and ever since he's been the chief, bold / deep bombings inside Russia have escalated greatly. Although WEF is pro-Ukraine, I have the sense that it's also anti-Israel secretly. Leftism is showing itself to be anti-Israel these days. Might Western leftists now side with a Turkish- / Russian-led invasion of Israel? I don't see any other workable scenario for getting a Western anti-Christ on-side with Russia.

The more that NATO continues to weaken Russia, the more Russia may decide to go the anti-Israel route while conquering as far as Kiev for the $$$ it needs to survive.

Is it possible that the 2300 days start as late as 2029 at roughly the timing of Apophis? My answer: only if the 666 is on an optional level until the start of 3032. This picture has the 2nd Trumpet in the first year of the final seven, with Armageddon roughly at the start of 2035. In this picture, the White House may be back in leftist hands due Republicans distancing too many of their voters from election houses.

It's also possible that the 2300 days do not start in Daniel 11:28: "And [the anti-Christ] shall return to his land [from Egypt] with great wealth, but his heart shall be set against the holy covenant. And he shall work his will and return to his own land." This stab against Israel may be a considerable time before the start of the 2300-day assault on Israel, in which case his victory over Egypt can be a year or more before the 2300 days.

The difficulty in imagining a Turkish or Russian invasion of Egypt, as things now stand, is possibly why prophecy students don't see Daniel 11:21-31 as an end-time prophecy. We tend to think that Turkey is not likely to invade a fellow Muslim nation. There needs to be a compelling reason to do so, and we don't tend to think that Egypt's toleration of Israel is sufficient reason. I don't know what Egypt may have done throughout the latest Gaza war that may have greatly angered the Turkish leaders.

Nobody expects Russia to invade Egypt.

But, if an anti-Israel movement is now taking shape, it can grow to the point of calling for punishment upon Egypt especially, for supporting Israel after the Gazan genocide. Gaza is between Israel and Egypt, and so pro-Palestinian fighters must be aghast at Egypt's toleration of the Gazan genocide. The Egyptian leader did visit with the Turkish leader last summer, and they got along well; the war against Gaza was hot at the time.

Maybe I should forget Apophis landing in 2029. Maybe the 666 is 20 or more years away. Sorry, but.

Abd al-Rahim Atoun is a prominent figure within Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS)...holding a high-ranking position second only to Abu Mohammad al-Julani, the leader of HTS. He is known for delivering lectures organized by the HTS-sponsored Salvation Government in Idlib, including one focused on the "Taliban model" of jihad and resistance.

It was only yesterday, as I write here on Saturday, that Russia recognized the Taliban as the official Afghan government. Why would Russia do such a thing, not done by any other nation? What benefit would such an announcement make at the cost of distancing Russia from the norm? Is Russia so desperate financially that it needs trade deals with Afghanistan? Or is Russia calling on pro-Taliban fighters to unite for a cause? What for? Does Russia know of a pro-Taliban movement in Syria and Iraq, and is Russia seeking to address it? The Taliban (Sunni) allows Shi'ites into its jihadist movement. Turkey is Sunni.

Atoun's definition of "Taliban model of jihad" may be: how to defeat the Americans.

From geopoliticalmonitor.com:

The Muslim Brotherhood’s brief period in power during Muhammed Morsi’s presidency exposed governmental shortcomings, leading the Egyptian military to stage a ‘soft coup’ in 2013 [Obama was arming ISIS in Syria at the time]. Because Egypt prohibits the movement, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) actively promote the marginalization of moderate Islamists in the Middle East. The Saudi Kingdom, the UAE, and Egypt consider the Muslim Brotherhood a dangerous movement because of its ability to mobilize liberal and secular movements, its sway over large populations, its anti-Islamic stance, and its influential political voice in the Middle East. However, its ideological influence over the parties it formerly backed has drastically diminished. Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Egypt have all taken strong action against the Muslim Brotherhood. On the other hand, Qatar and Turkiye back the organization.

Can anyone see how Turkey might prompt the Brotherhood to overthrow el-Sisi? Perhaps president Erdogan called Sisi to Turkey last year to see if some deals can be made that benefit the Brotherhood inside Egypt. But I frankly can't see an invasion of Egypt anytime soon, not in the next year, not until some rabid Muslim voices start howling from the rooftops. Last I heard, one-quarter of Gaza remains, and Israel would like to take that too. Last I heard, Trump wants casinos in Gaza, so to speak.

Once can argue that, if Turkey wanted death to Israel, it would have supported the Assad-Iran axis. Then again, maybe Erdogan just hates Shi'ites too much to let them rule on his border. In any case, Turkey was forbidden by the West to support the axis against Israel, and Turkey did not start the war against Assad. Once Assad was about finished, however, Turkey saw opportunity to replace him with a Sunni government. And that's where we stand now, but with Russia having at least as much sway in Syria as the Americans do in order to pry Turkey away from the West. Russia was in Turkey's bad book for assisting Assad, however. The Middle-East always looks like mud. Nobody can see it clearly.

We might wonder which jihadist group just blew up a church in Damascus with at least two dozen deaths:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqkIfVrpI2Y

Julani may feel helpless to curb the slaughter of Arabic Christians, even if he wants to, lest he be killed himself. The anti-Christ is not just interesting prophecy, but is a slaughter machine who hates Christians. This is the only war that matters, holding the only hope. The West as we know it will be gone. That's a good thing.

Perhaps God wants to weaken Gaza, Hezbollah and Iran so that, when His invasion of Israel arrives, we can more-clearly see His hand at work. Credit won't go to Israel's standard enemies, but to a wholly new one.

Trump says he can't understand what's wrong with Putin for attacking Kiev, pretending as though he doesn't know of Ukraine's recent bombings of Russian military bases on multiple strikes that appear geared by NATO. He knows that Europe has refused to back NATO off of Russia, which is what Russia wants to end the war. And so Russia just bombed Kiev again, late this week, with ferocity as a payback measure for Ukraine's invasions deep into Russia...duh, Trump can't figure it out, ya-ya-sure-sure. If true that these latest strikes are by Chinese drones loaned or granted to Russia, its time to bite nails, world, for Trump could be that very egotistical lunatic who won't back down that the world once feared more than anything. Not anymore, because the Internet has made the people more into fearless zombies than sharp observers. World War 3 has become a sport for the cheering sides to help ignite:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwwm4wMM-10

I don't hear Trump scolding Zelensky for bombing Russian bases. I don't hear Europe ready to give reparations to pay for Russia's costs in this war, which I blame on NATO and Zelensky together. Trump once did too, until his war-hawk fan base slapped him out of it (so to speak). Try telling Putin that NATO will cease arming Zelensky. Instead, Trump and Rutte are calling for more NATO funding. Trump wants to more than triple NATO funding. Who's the real lunatic here, Trump or Putin? What would Trump do to save the United States if Russia were ten times bigger than the Unites States, and using canadian land to bomb the United States? Try putting on Putin's shoes, if you want to understand why Russians are looking suicidal in Ukraine.

Isn't it true that NATO-Zelensky is the Hamas of Europe killing the Ukraine people? Yes, it's true, because they know that Russia will retaliate for incursions into Russia. They don't care, because the NATO objective is to weaken Russia military at the expense of Ukrainian lives. Zelensky doesn't care because this war has made him filthy rich in blood-soaked money. He prefers to be blind to this immorality. A blind NATO will lead a blind Zelensky into the ditch. That's the Ukraine reality. Nobody in the United States has yet tried to promise Putin to keep NATO and American weapons out of Ukraine. I believe that Russia will stop bombing Ukraine if NATO demands that Ukraine stop bombing Russians.

The Ukrainian people have been lulled by NATO propaganda to become reserved to dying for the country rather than to demand the ouster of NATO. How is this not murder of Ukrainians by Ukrainians? Russia fears that, if it withdraws from Ukraine, NATO will seek to invade it with American support; the clues are everywhere. What doesn't the West understand about this? The solution was very easy a decade ago: let Russia occupy Crimea and the Don-river watershed, and stop killing Ukrainians by a war effort against Russia. After that, the Russian military will move out. It's what the Russians have been saying from the start.

NATO propaganda is to make the world believe that Russia is almost toppled, just a little more war will do it. And the propaganda falsely accuses Russia of acting "expansionist." Trump the manipulator pretends to be Putin's friend in order to manipulate his country. Yes, Russians can become an expansionist, if you attack it with the promise of more attacks, when the opportunity arises to take land without giving it back. It's standard practice for all nations at war. Ukraine would permanently take Russian land, if it could.

What good is it for Trump to tell Zelensky that the United States will not give him more weapons, in order to force peace, if Trump simultaneously advocates more money to NATO? Hello? How will this make Russia feel comfortable toward a peace settlement? Instead, it makes Russia feel that Trump is some kind of an evil joker inside of his peace-treaty suit. It's not so simple as to conclude that Russia doesn't want a peace treaty now, wherefore Russia is the aggressor. Israel doesn't like being forced into peace with Hamas if the peace-lull is used by Hamas to re-arm. Ditto for Russia.

Elon Musk is now becoming dangerous, if indeed his feud with Trump is real, and I tend to think it's real. It occurred to me that Musk was spying out the American government on behalf of China, when working for DOGE, but I haven't wanted to say this because it's an atrocious accusation if untrue. Musk seems to have some morality, but he also seems to have hunger for more power to call the global shots. It just so happens that while Musk promotes electric vehicles and solar-panel mountainsides with China, Trump denied his green-energy dreams this week, after Musk ended his time at DOGE, a big slap in Musk's face.

Therefore, Musk could turn on the United States, siding with Russia and China...which could make him a hero again of American leftists, as he was before siding with Trump. What happens when Starlink satellites are turned against the West? Such a betrayal of the West seems unthinkable for Musk, but he could do it secretly. He could collect Intelligence for Western enemies secretly.

The longer NATO fights Russia, the more Russia eyes / justifies taking Ukrainian land permanently to pay for the war. Any abused nation would feel the same way.

The pro-Ukraine video below claims that Germany has opted to fund the Ukraine war, but this gives me the impression that the Americans and others are slipping war money into the Ukraine war by giving it to Germany to hand off, to ave face for trump, so that he doesn't look like he's supporting Ukraine while touting peace. This is the same German government that didn't show one concern for its people when the West ceased its gas purchases when bombing the Russian pipeline. The German government exposed itself as a vile WEF lunatic in those days; nobody saw it coming as to how bad it was.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rp-rLhpvkT0

Macron is calling Russia to a peace treaty (as a ruse, obviously) because Russia is making gains on Ukraine territory at this time in new-found anger. This situation is very bad, because the West will aggravate the situation by portraying Putin as a mad bear that needs to be put down. In other words, the West makes Russia a mad bear, then blames Putin for it. Punch him in the face, then charge him with assault when he fights back. It's exactly the maddening situation that can spark a world war. The last thing it needs is a Trump referee whose words cannot be trusted. At the end of this week, this wild card is showing himself as leaning pro-Ukraine.

Fox headline this week: "Pete Hegseth: My job is to restore the 'warrior ethos'" Would Jesus say that? Just saying. I suggest that Christians should not be at the charge of the American military. Leave that job to the Hell-bound. There is defilement in the military. No Christian should wish to be a soldier, to focus on the mastery of killing people. We have no direction from the New Testament to join the militaries of the Roman empire or nations.

In fact, keeping tabs on the news is full of defilement from non-believers. Yes, the wheat is to grow amongst the weeds, but we should not show God that we like being amongst the weeds. We should not show God that we are concerned about every patriotic news story, every Trump-is-winning news story. Our allegiance is to be to the Kingdom of God. If we adopt to our concerns our own country's matters, as told by non-Christians, isn't it a form of adultery against God? If we get lulled into hoping for a better economy, how is this the calling of Jesus? Sure, I'm happier when common people like myself need to struggle less financially, but I don't follow business / economic news, shudder. I don't want the mentalities of non-Christians rubbing off on me as I listen to them telling the news.

What happens to us when we listen to Christian newscasters who speak the very same as non-Christians because those Christians get their news from them? Is it okay if we listen to the same news, with the same styles, the same concerns, so long as the speaker is a Christian? We are becoming defiled by the weeds, and so let's minimize it. Cleansing and healing will arrive when the Kingdom appears. Until then, minimize the dirt that gets onto our "clothing" i.e. into our spirit. Hate the world where "world" is defined as those who care not for Jesus. The degree of hatred depends on the degree of transgression. Generally, in everyday life, we don't perform with gross hatred that makes us monsters, but we define "hate" as "forsake / abandon." "Love your enemies" means, "don't use a club." "Love your enemies" cannot mean to spend lots of time with them as we get defiled in the meantime. As we work amongst non-Christians, we are careful not to neglect Jesus, which can be challenging to various degrees depending on the personalities we need to tolerate. It can often make us feel phony as we "love" those we don't love much. I don't like being in that situation, sensing that certain people would hate me the second I mention that I'm a Christian. We await a society filled with like-minded ones, when Jesus sets up that Society.

To carry our cross daily surely centers on our keeping loyal to Jesus while in non-Christian societies. We need to tolerate being "losers" until the end, for losers and weepers will become the first when winners will become the last. Of course, we don't view ourselves as losers, and we have the choice not to get deeply depressed about the predicament. We can hold our heads high for Jesus, knowing we have a future, and a Guard / Coach at our side until we get there.

I have a hard time understanding how 200 million people can march into Iraq as per the "kings of the east" in Revelation. One way to explain it is where China decides to do some "population control," get many killed by forcing them to march. Imagine the damage that war jets can do to such a dense population of fighters? Otherwise, if it's not a murder campaign by the Chinese government, how can we explain this march?

NEWS

John Ratcliffe ordered a review of his own CIA, its boss under Obama, to see whether there was CIA malice in facilitating the Russia-collusion hoax. Ratcliffe's people found that there was political malice to the point of high crimes committed against Trump in partnership with the FBI:
https://nypost.com/2025/07/02/us-news/obamas-trump-russia-collusion-report-was-corrupt-from-start-cia-review/

Ratcliffe: "All the world can now see the truth: Brennan, Clapper and Comey manipulated intelligence and silenced career professionals — all to get Trump." And Ratcliffe called the CIA report under Brennan "atypical & corrupt."

Ratcliffe's assessment was released Wednesday, but as of Friday night, I saw not one pro-Trump, youtube podcaster doing a story on it, aside from Alex Jones at bitchute. Perhaps youtube canada, now worse than ever in hiding conservative news, is hiding those stories. Or maybe the 4th-of-July holiday (Friday) explains it. Kash Patel chimed in the day before, releasing FBI emails exposing the FBI's head office covering up the Chinese side of Trump's overthrow in the 2020 election. It is Patel's responsibility to arrest Chris Wray for covering up the Chinese connection, which is treason. youtube won't give me one story when requesting "ratcliffe russia collusion"

. Why were these stories released in the thick of the congressional vote for the big bill? Who advised the CIA and FBI to put those stories out at that time such that they would receive minimal exposure? What kind of games are being played on the election promise to punish the deep state?

In honor of Thomas Massie, in dishonor of the American government under Trump, and shame to Trump for not shrinking the government, as promised:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HBaC5ScOtc

Here's Candace Owens, this week, telling that Trump called her by phone to demand that she stop exposing the wife of president Macron as a man. You would think that pro-Trump podcasters will jump in and spread this story, but, with pro-Trumpers, one is now in zombieland. They refuse to portray him in any bad light. ZOMBIES. Candace is rightly and courageously betraying Trump in this video. Macron's wife was a pedophile to boot, when he met Macron:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1103XwJ2N9c

Normally, a private phone call should be kept secret, and Candace had Kept the call with Trump a secret to begin with, but I think she had decided from the start to betray Trump, at some later date, and rightly so because he was in the wrong to call. He should have told Macron that his wife has nothing to do with war dealings. On the other hand, Trump may have fabricated the reason for the call i.e. he and Macron were not working on a war strategy, he fabricated it in an attempt get leverage on Candace.

Assuming that Trump was ignorant of Macron's "wife," he should have, before calling, watched her documentary on Macron's male wife, to see if the accusative substance was credible, and he should afterward have told Macron, "you disgusting pig." Instead, Trump sided with Macron and tried to silence Candace, exposing to her what a sickie he is. She did right to expose he and Macron together for that cheap trick.

Days ago, Trump told the public that Netanyahu is innocent of the court charges looming over him. But how would Trump know? Or, is Trump just a gangster in disguise who protects other gangsters when he works with them politically? Here's a Candace Owens production (male narrator) against Netanyahu, which could well explain why she's not romanticizing over his Israel at this time:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxUDKUgJSGI

Valuetainment did a podcast on the Trump call, but almost everyone in the comments section sided with Candace, which I find refreshing because I figure that most of them are pro-Trump. Maybe there is hope for Trump zealots after all. Here's one despicable comment from the Valuetainment podcast: "The thing is…why do we care if Brigitte is really a man? I am a conservative Christian Republican and I don’t care if Brigitte is from Mars. How does knowing that change anything?" Spoken like a lukewarm Christian who doesn't mind the world going to spiritual rot, even at the highest levels of politics.

I predict that Zionist Republicans will close their eyes when watching the video above, then move on to another video. Accusing Fox news as news-light is a gross understatement. "News-deviant" is more like it. Fox won't touch the harsh realities. If it feels as though the world is falling, it's probably because it's falling. Gangsters and faggots in government won't keep it healthy, especially when they dearly want globalism together.

Anti-Semites will love the video above, but it was about Netanyahu, not Jews in general. I'm grateful for learning that Netanyahu has sided with murderous Israeli's, placing them into his government. It explains Gaza, and yet Trump wants to profit from Israeli brutality in Gaza. Will brutality come to the West Bank soon?

Musk is threatening to start his new federal party when the big bill passes. Apparently, Musk's biggest beef is that the bill takes tax money from solar-panel and wind-turbine products. Musk wants solar panels all over the world, which is some evidence that he's "controlled" (influenced) by China. He sounds like a typical Democrat on this issue. It's not his only nutty pet.

Apparently, Musk wants to become the president via his own party. I think it can explain why he bought Twitter. His apparent conservative positions may have been feigned as part of becoming more popular for the sake of becoming the president. It's making sense. I think he would be a dictator type with a futurist mindset in direct opposition to Godliness. Like many other presidential candidates, he would offer niceties to Christians to nab their votes.

RFK needs to mandate American flour that has nothing but wheat in the ingredient list. Something in American flour makes a few people feel sick, but not when they eat European flour. "Benzoyl peroxide is a chemical used to bleach or whiten wheat flour by oxidizing the natural yellow pigments (carotenoids). It's a common additive in flour, particularly in North America, and is generally recognized as safe by the FDA. While banned in some countries, like those in the European Union, it's permitted in Canada and the US." Looks like we found the culprit. It's thought to be cancerous, and so why in northern North America taking chances with it?

Sometimes, it seems that governments are indeed protecting people, yet they all murdered people or destroyed their body parts by mRNA vaccines. How to explain? It means that some government people are good, others evil, and that most politicians, policemen, and doctors/nurses are easily evil-ized in return for some big-fast-$$$. We saw it with our own eyes, that those who are supposed to protect us allowed us to risk terrible things by becoming bribed. How sickening is that? But they also demonized us for speaking about it, but I demand punishment of the guilty parties. Forgiveness of criminals does not curb their criminality. The Bible instructs us to forgive only when there is repentance. Trump is guilty of letting criminals go free by not demanding their arrests from Pam Bondi. Arresting them sends a huge message to other carefree criminals in government. Trump is betraying his nation.

In the video below, RFK says that the CDC (government disease fighters) hid a Belgian study that found an atrocious increase of autism from old-school vaccines:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxUDKUgJSGI

Artur Pawlozski, who became an anti-government warrior ever since the COVID police invaded his Calgary church, tells of his on-going problems from government wolves, yet we never hear about his plight from the conservative premier of Alberta. How politically weak have Christians become, and why?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76ua3pXsrbY

Maybe God doesn't think that Artur is fighting in the right way, I don't know. But exposing anti-Christs in government never hurts. Perhaps his failures and troubles are for the very purpose of exposures, to show how tooth-and-nail the wolves fight for unjustified reasons. I think canadian churches are far too soft, far too go-with-the-flow, but if they were more politically outspoken, the Conservative parties would pick up their voices more. The trouble is, in Alberta, the premier wouldn't even reimburse COVID-vaccine victims, not make light of their plights, for which reason Ms. Smith became like puke to me after I celebrated her victory over the vaccine pusher before her.

canada, at the government and media levels, has become a model anti-Christian machine thanks to the silence of most churches. It will now take a lot more fight just to dig out of the hole that the churches have made for themselves. Be silent, and the anti-Christian forces will expect you to be silent, and bury you in the hole if you speak out. At the proper time, God will fight back for those who carry His name, for it is not Allah Do-Nothing.

The problem may be Christian Zionists / pre-tribulationists. Perhaps they are all-too go-with-the-flow people, Canadians first, Christians second. But I can't be sure because I have no idea what church leaders are thinking. And that's the problem: we don't hear much from them to know. I get the impression they just want to stay out of politics for fear of losing members who vote Liberal, HOW SICK, but I just don't know that to be a norm.

Mr. Pawlozski doesn't do himself well when being a Trump fan, and it didn't help him when he got together with a Florida pastor, Rodney Howard-Browne, an advocate of "holy laughter. I was thinking that maybe Artur didn't know that about Rodney.

If you're not familiar with the "Shroud of Turin," Dr. John Campbell has another show on it this week. I have zero doubt that this is the burial cloth of Jesus:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-GH8Hag5dUw

The Highwire this week has a depressing, vaccine-injury documentary. The hope is that this gets around to vilify all the medical peoples and others who partook in a deliberate, mass-killer campaign:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vkD9KrQF7DdJ

At about 2hr12 minutes of the video above, there are comments essentially accusing Trump of strapping RFK such that he's "unable" to remove mRNA vaccines from children. Just think of it, and you understand why I will never repent of describing Trump as trash of Hell deserving great punishment. For although he was responsible for killing at least 300,000 Americans by rushing an untested new product, he did not recall the vaccines once the ailments were being reported on social media. He has done nothing since to repent nor to recognize the families of the dead, or the millions who were made permanently sick, or horrifically sick for a "short" time of weeks or months.

RFK looks like such a dismal hypocrite, saying he cares about food dyes in children's cereal, but allowing parents to possibly kill their own kids from an unjustified fear of COVID. I assume he's doing a balancing act, trying not to be fired by Trump, trying to keep his job to do as much good as possible. Shame on Trump, and on his zombies who don't want to accuse him of foisting a vaccine horror in order to compel him to cancel the vaccines, PERIOD.

Tear-jerker:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9MpE1BVnWE

Here's Elon Musk in a Rolling Stones article just three months ago: "Elon Musk defended the efficacy of vaccines after podcaster pal Joe Rogan interviewed an anti-vax conspiracy theorist on his show." Apparently, Musk did not receive the COVID vaccine, perhaps because he knew it was a high risk for receiving poison. Yet, we read: "However, by 2021, [Musk's] tune had changed. 'To be clear, I do support vaccines in general & covid vaccines specifically.'"

I do not think that the American government intends to pay back the debt to the Federal Reserve because it's immoral to force tax payers to pay back money that was printed by the Reserve in the first place. The Reserve only wants the interest on the loaned, printed money, which is bizarre to say the least, like a big-beautiful money printing machine owned by the big-beautiful gangster. You are being lied to, Americans:

The Federal Reserve System is NOT OWNED BY ANYONE [oh yea]; it's a unique entity with both public and private aspects. The Federal Reserve Banks are structured like private corporations, but they exist because of an act of Congress. The Board of Governors, the central governing body, is an independent agency of the federal government, reporting to and accountable to Congress. While MEMBER BANKS hold stock in the Federal Reserve Banks and earn dividends, the U.S. Government does not hold shares and the system is not a profit-making institution.

So, the Reserve is owned by someones, the big bankers. They print money that goes to big corporations from the hands of fellow gangsters like Trump, and they collect interest money from tax payers, and the Trump zombies are okay with this as long as Trump calls it "beautiful," as long as Trump includes some candy with one hand while robbing them with the other on behalf of the owners of the Reserve. Trump is not opposed to the Reserve; he just wants it to charge less interest so that he can spend more of the printed money for his agendas.

google AI is lying to you: "These Reserve Banks are not operated for profit, and the stock ownership is a condition of membership, not a means of control." But we just read that banker shareholders receive dividends, and they can be cashed in. Or, what would be the use in banks holding stock if the purpose is not to profit money? The Federal Reserve is a gangster. Go ahead, try to find which banks own its stock. Go ahead, try to find the truths behind this monster, from google. Do-ya-thunk that google protects the owners by design? Go ahead, try to find the truth on what holds U.S. debt. google would have you believe that the Reserve holds a small portion while private corporations hold the rest. Who are they? Why are the details never on the news? Since when do gangsters tell the truth?

Go ahead, find a list of which countries hold the U.S. debt, and how much each has loaned? You are told at google AI that Japan and China hold most of the loan. BALONEY. "Japan and China, followed by the United Kingdom, Luxembourg, and Canada...Japan is the largest foreign holder of U.S. debt, with over $1 trillion in Treasury holdings...China is the second-largest foreign holder of U.S. debt, with holdings around $759 billion." That's a long way from the 36 trillion borrowed. On the page below, the top 20 countries said to hold the debt have loaned less than 7 trillion, and then it says that the rest of the world has loaned 1.6 trillion. Why doesn't the page tell where the rest of the 28 trillion come from?
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/ranked-the-top-20-countries-holding-the-most-u-s-debt/

Google AI: "No there isn't any list of private US debt holders." They'll make up some excuse as to why not. My bet is that the in-with-the-Reserve bankers hold most of it.

---

NEXT UPDATE

Here's all four Gospels wrapped into one story.

For Some Prophetic Proof for Jesus as the Predicted Son of God.
Also, you might like this related video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3EjmxJYHvM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efl7EpwmYUs

Pre-Tribulation Preparation for a Post-Tribulation Rapture

---