Knowing that Anu and his Anunnaki pantheon of gods depicted Anakites living in Susa, I started to uncover his "glorious" father in the following way, but only because I had just read an article the night before, on Elamite history, that used a people-group term fitting him to a tee. Afterward, as I continued questioning who Anu's other family members might depict, I found that I had enough keys to lift the veil on the entire family.

Anu's father was Anshar, a clear depiction of the Iranian region of Ansan/Anzan, as for example we note the anciently-recorded phrase, "king of Anshan and Susa." Ansan, in the Zagros mountains south-east of Susa, was the capital of Elam before Susa took that role. The tie to Ansan explains how Elam was at one time non-Semitic. It's odd to make that claim because Elam was a son of Shem, yet Aryans of the Zagros had mixed with Elamites to produce their Aryan blood.

You do see that "Anshar/Anshan" can modify to "Anchar/Anchan," evoking "Anaki." It may not be rated by some as much more than a guess, but Anakites must have been the Aryan side of Elamites since Aryans are typically reported in history as being tallish, while Semites are not so reported. The following speaks to the infusion of Susa blood into Elam, and in the process distinguishes between early Elam and Susa; in my mind, this picture is the moving of Delymites on the Caspian shores down to Susa near the Persian gulf. Note my italics:

"This [Elamite] dynasty, which was remarkable for its duration, was also characterized by a progressive "semitization" of the royal line; owing to the annexation of Susiana to the Elamite empire, the sukkalmahs ensured that Susa would remain a major center....Susians preserved their Suso-Mesopotamian pantheon, at the head of which was Inšušinak, the tutelary divinity of the city..."

http://www.cais-soas.com/CAIS/History/Elamite/elam_history.htm

The "sukkalmah" term (meaning "king") is interesting for it's potential to form "Solymi" and therefore "Delym(ite)." In the phrase, "Suso-Mesopotamian," it's the Mesopotamian part that was Semitic. I would view the Susa part as Zeus = the Anakite and/or Titan(ic) Aryans. The glue forming the Elamite bond with Susa must have been the Anakite-Semite mix that was likewise in Susa. Two reasons for which I see Anakites among the Susanians are: 1) their chief god, Insusinak/Susinak, evokes Susa-Anaki, and, 2) the Anunnaki gods were depicted as bulls while Insusinak was the "bull-god of Susa."
http://wwwa.concise.britannica.com/ebc/article-9082292/Chogha-Zanbil

I don't think it's a coincidence that Elamites, Susanians, and Sumerians were all a Semite-Aryan mix, but rather it shows flow from one location to the other. I'll confidently assert that it was in Uruk and Eridu that these same Aryans became the Rukhs and Rus respectively that were part of the Rus-Semite dragon cult. It would appear that, at some point, the Anakite-Semite merger became so deep and strong as to be a permanent people group distinguished from Aryans on the one hand, and Semites on the other.

The parents of Anu reveal one direction of early migration from Ansan to Sumeria, and another direction from a Kish peoples to Sumeria, for the other parent of Anu (aside from Anshar) was made "Kishar." There you have the make-up of Anu, an Anshar-Kish mix, but with the Anakites portrayed as superior by the choice of "Anu" to depict the mix (i.e. the Anu myth was probably written by the Anaki side of the mix). Kish became a city less than ten miles from Babylon in the heart of the Semite kingdom, though I can't say yet that this was the location of Kishar when Anu was produced in Eridu (i.e. Kishar may have moved to found Kish later, as an extension of Anu = the inhabitants of Eridu).

Myths offer other terms allowing us to see back in time yet further. Kishar was made the daughter of Lahmu/Lakmu and Lahamu, where these terms refer to the region of "Eden" (i.e. what the Eden/dragon cult considered to be Eden but wasn't truly), where the fresh waters of the Euphrates met the salty Persian gulf i.e. the delta region. Lahmu was the fresh water, and the salt water was called the Tiamat, which was made the mother of Lahmu/Lahamu.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lahmu

Of course, the ocean does not give birth to a river, but this is not what the myth writer(s) had in mind, but rather that the Tiamat peoples living on the ocean shore evolved into the Lahmu>Kishar peoples living on the delta and river. They obviously came from one direction or the other to the delta, and the compass needle points directly to Bahrain on the western side of the Persian gulf, for reasons given later in the chapter.

"Tiamat" may or may not have been intended to depict the Maat = Medes, but I will definitely equate the term with "Atamti" (Adam-ites?), an ancient name referring to Elamites. I will therefore claim that mythical Athamas, father of the golden fleece line, was from Tiamat = the Persian-gulf shore at the Eden delta. In those days, the Persian gulf was the Erythraei/Red sea; the city named after it, Eridu, was likely built on the very coast, for historical records attest to this (i.e. it is known that sea level has dropped significantly since then). I find myself struck by a previous Adam = Edom equation, made when I didn't know of the "Atamti" term, and here I find that the term traces smack to dragon-cult Eden.

The husband of Tiamat, and likewise the parent of Lahmu, was made "Abzu/Absu." We can suspect that the Absu peoples were likewise on the ocean shore, not necessarily from the Eden delta originally, but ending up there (as the Tiamat-Abzu mix). The term that first came to my mind, on reflecting, was "abusso," the Greek term used in Revelation 9 (our "abyss") in depiction of Apollyon and Abaddon peoples. As I had identified these in earlier chapters as Avvites/Avidians, I realize as I write just now that "Abzu" could be their origin. In Revelation 9, Abaddon/Apollyon is the destroyer who comes to inflict torture on those who jump in bed with the end-time dragon. This is seemingly contradictory, but, no, for God often turns a peoples onto themselves when he wants them destroyed.

Having reasoned that these peoples led to legendary Avalon, isn't it amazing that Tolkien made his "Avallone" the capital of his "Eressea," what I identified as the island of Rothesay, now Bute? That is, doesn't "Abzu" provide the makings of Bute-like terms? Wait until you see how "Abzu" could have provided the "Bazu" that furnished "Washington," totally independent of any attempts by myself to make the connection. Imagine that, if I have discovered the roots of the "fathers of America" in the Abzu. Zowwwie!

I had theorized many chapters ago that "Bute" and Poseidon were from Buzi/Busae and/or Budii Medes. Now I find that mythical Abzu depicted Aryans and that one may reason like so: Avi > Avid > Abzu-Eden = Poseidon. That is, Poseidon may have been an Avvite-Eden mix. Afterward, "Abzu" formed Buz and Bute terms, and it may be that Nahor named his son after these terms because his bloodline was from them. One thing I know, that back in May, God gave me impetus to get cracking on a new direction for this book, at which time He revealed to me (as per my account given in the first paragraphs of the first chapter of this book) that Buz, son of Nahor, led back to the mythical bee symbol/bloodline. Here I am, six months later, at the original hive...knowing that Avvites were that hive.

In this chapter I'll show that "Magan" is a term special to this bloodline, and that it connects to the Magyars known to have formed Hungarians. I've therefore got to repeat that a bee to Hungarians is "bij" to this day, and assert that it's no coincidence for the city of Opis to have been "Ubija" to the Akkadians...which by the way reflects the Biblical "Avviy" (our "Avvite") very well.

Having known for some time that God calls Amorites bees in the Bible, and having learned only last week that Amorites came to furnish Albania and the Iberi/Avars, it is support for 1) an Amorite connection to Avvites, 2) a Hebrew side to the bee peoples, and, 3) a Hebrew side to Amorites.

I'm suggesting that Abzu>Opis was specifically the Hebrew portion of the Semites, and that Anu was part-Hebrew in this way. To put it another way, Hebrews were on the Persian gulf, something that has me excited because I read something back in May convincing me that Abrahamic Sheba and Dedan were on the west side of the Persian gulf...though I did not publish this then or at any other point in the book, because it wasn't the right time. I first wanted to trace Hebrews back to that spot by other means.

I am here finding that my previous connecting of Opis-branch Avvites forward to mythical Abas at Argos is supported by the near-match of "Abas" to "Absu." The Absu on the delta must have moved up the Tigris to name Opis (near Baghdad), and these, after first becoming the Argives, became Pisidians in and all around Lydia.

Having already pointed out that these peoples, as the mythical Opis and Arge Hyperboreans, took the far-north route to Greece through the Lazi region of Caucasia, see now where the Abzu should have become Bute-like terms, as they became Batumi (i.e. the Colchian Bati peoples) and nearby Phasis/Poti, before becoming Batea, mother of Tyndareus. This is full-proof, for Tyndareus was the husband of Leda, and she was from the Laz peoples who lived at Batumi and Poti (see expandable old map of Caucasia).

It's intriguing that Bandar Abbas is now a city on the Persian gulf (see map of modern Hormuz region). Although it is said that this location was named after Shah Abbas I, one can ask if that shah wasn't in the first place named after the Abbas/Absu region and/or bloodline. One may ask why he named this region, of all his domains, after himself. On this other map of Hormuz, one can see the island of Kishm off the coast of Abbas. This seems quite revelatory, for Abzu was made to give birth to Lahmu>Kishar, suggesting perhaps that Kishites originated at/near Hormuz, a very logical theory because the first can be identified tentatively as proto-Cutha while the other was surely Hermes. It's interesting that my previous definition of the Cutha was a Kassite-Semite mix on what the reader may then have considered flimsy evidence (I-just-know-it intuition isn't always easy to describe on paper).

As Lahmu gave birth to both Kishar and Ansan, the direction of migration at this point is from the Eden delta toward Susa and Ansan. It may or may not be that Kish was Susa, but it's a known fact that Kissians (Kassites) had been around Susa. Therefore, mark this, that Kishar depicted Kissian-branch Kassites...wherefore his parent, Lahmu, was at least part Kassite. Apparently, Lahmu was also Ansan Anakite, but I do see that "Lahmu" may have been a code for "Elam" and/or "Delymae." It should prove to be, therefore, that Kassites were the Aryans who furnished Anakites, or vice versa. At some point, the "Habira" became fused with Kassites and/or their southern Kissian "child."

In relation to Ansan, Hormuz was south along the Persian gulf. The Pars province (see map), important because it provides the Gorgons and many Pars-like characters of Greek myth, may have stretched in those days (it doesn't quite today) as far as the Hormuz straight. That straight has always been in a position to control sea trade in and out of the Persian gulf. I tie "Gorgon" to "Argo" = cargo = merchants = Amorite/Roman Mercury = Armenian Hermes.

Kishar and Ansan, though siblings, were also made husband and wife (probably required when siblings provide mutually-derived offshoot tribes). In giving birth to Anu, the migration path now returns to the Eden delta, to Eridu. From here, the direction of the dragon is overwhelmingly north.

Keep in mind that you won't read this "illumination" in occult-based Wikipedia (i.e. Wicca-pedia), for I can sense that the organization is reigned, in order not to leak such things, and may even be geared heavily for subtle deception by an army of occult writers. All of myth is double-speak; it's the science and art of double meanings; and Illuminati-wanna-bees know it.

If they won't reveal it, I will, that Tiamat Medes trace to Dumuzi of Uruk. Am I to believe that myth-loving Freemasons have not seen it: Atamti/Tiamat = Dumuzi/Tammuz? Surely these became Tamazgha = northern Africa, and therefore the Libyan and Berber Amazighen = Amazons. In that case, Dumuzi and Demeter, and the Atamti portion of the Elamites, were Meshech Aryans, to be distinguished from the Togarmites who named the Tigris river.

My first impression now is that Meshech and Togarmites were distinct enough to be distinguished all the way to Trojan territory, where they met as (mythical) Dardanus and Teucer (this marriage produced Trojans). My view is that they maintained distinction because Togarmites went the route of the far north (as Hyperboreans/Tocharians). Meshech are known to have been south-shore Phrygians from Armenia (though some did venture to the north shore in forming the Alans). I will definitely place Hermes under the Meshech umbrella, therefore.

To prove that Dardanus was Meshech on his Aryan side, not only was Mysia loaded with Amazons/Meshech, but Dardanus was king of Mysia. And behold, not only was "Abydos" a Trojan city at Dardanus/Mysia, but Dardanus was made to marry Batea, the daughter of Teucer, in Mysia. If that's not enough, an important Butes (bull-cult) character was made to be born from their bloodline.

In this picture, Tartars were Meshech if Tartars were indeed an extension of Dardanian elements.

The Abydos-Batea equation reveals that Avvites were Teucrians = Togarmites on their Aryan side, which is what I had concluded earlier. Another conclusion is that the Absu Hebrews were tied to Togarmites, suggesting now that Absu Anakites were Togarmites, which tends to fit the Anakite identification with Kassites since the two lived in the same east-of-Tigris regions.

[Update March 2007 -- I just discovered that it's thought by some that ancient Apasa/Abasa was Ephesus (in Lydia not far from Abydos), and those terms certainly smack of "Abzu," in which case the Abzu were Amazons, since it's known that Ephesus was founded by Amazons.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephesus End update]

I had previously traced the Argonauts from Uruk to Bute in Argyll, and so understand now that because Dumuzi was the dragon cult in Uruk, the Argonauts trace further back to Tiamat (i.e. Dumuzi on the Persian gulf), who was made married to Abzu, suggesting once again that Abzu was proto-Bute. It's also evident that the Tiamat-Abzu mix was a Meshech-Togarmite one, not including their Semite blood. It can be otherwise viewed as an Amazon-Avvite mix. This became Amorites > Merovingian Franks > George-Washington Freemasonry > false-Christian prophets with anti-YHWH Hebrew blood.

Argonauts can be traced north from Uruk, to mythical Demeter, the Titan (= Tats) living in Hades (= Cadusia). This trace to the Cadusii fits, for when the Argonauts went to Colchis, they went to the city of Aia/Aea, which is called Kutaisi, in Georgia (see on this modern map of Caucasia). This now proves that the city holding the golden fleece was a Cadusii-named settlement, supporting my emphasis on the Cadusii as the holy-grail line. The gold cup in the hand of Ishtar, as portrayed in Revelation 17, and therefore Ishtar herself, depicts the Cadusii. I'm not one to make such claims about Revelation lightly, for I know that we are not to muddy up God's Revelation.

It would appear that the Dumuzi>Demeter migration northward was the Assyrian one (when Assyrians broke with Babylonians, taking their god, Assur, with them to found Assyria), for "The best known of [the Anunnaki] were Asaru, Asarualim, Asarualimnunna, Asaruludu, En-Ki (Ea for the Akkadians), Namru, Namtillaku and Tutu." Surely the Tutu were of the Euphrates city of Tuttul, but did they then become the Titans/Tats of Cadusia in that northern migration to Cadusia? Logical. If it's this Tuttul that links to Tahtali at the mount Olympos of Solymi realms, then it's that important as a people group, which can be seen in it's being anciently given a Titan role. Don't Titans and mount Olympus go together, after all? In that case, I expect it to be difficult to distinguish between Tats and the Solymi/Delymites.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anunnaki

I would peg those various "Asura" terms as Osiris. The Anunnaki god, Anshar, because he was also called "Ashur/Asshur" (website below), would translate to Osiris if Osiris' son, Horus, can be shown to translate to Anshar's son, Anu. This is a perfect parallel in my books because Anu was of Eridu while I had independently traced Horus to Eridu (because I trace the Hros to Eridu). Plus, with Osiris equated with Anshar = the city of Ansan, his wife, Isis, looks solidly like Ansan's ally, Susa. The picture here is one in which Ansan Anakites settled Asshur (though not necessarily naming the city).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anshar

It is not inspiring that Wikipedia can say, "The origin of Osiris's name is a mystery," especially when a version of his name is, in that very article, said to be "Asar." Either writers on these topics are willingly blind because they love to keep a good mystery (that loses its tang when revealed for what it really is), or they don't want to so much as give a tiny clue as to who these characters truly were. You'd think that someone would at least mention the city of Ashur as a possibility. Instead, the Wikipedia article suggests "throne of the eye" as the meaning of his name. The article goes on to tell that the Osiris cult replaced the Anubis cult, and behold, behold, that "Abydos, which had been a strong centre of the cult of Anubis, became a centre of the cult of Osiris" !
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osiris

Look for Osiris in the Abzu realm, therefore, near the Eden delta, for the Avvite dog-god, Anubis, was surely an Anu-Abzu / Anu-Opis / Anu-Buz mix. Oh yes, isn't Bandar Abbas at the Hormuz strait? Yes, it is and it must have been in ancient times, for "Hormuz" translates well into the origin of both Osiris and Horus, yes indeed.

It may be of prime importance that the Osiris-Horus bloodline goes from Ansan to Eridu to the Assyrian capital, Asshur, since the end-time Gogi anti-Christ will be an "Assyrian" (says Isaiah 14:25 / 30:31 / 31:8) while some are doubting that he will be a Russian. It seems obvious enough that Horus depicted the Hros = Rosh.

The region of Hormuz was so sacred that the Persian god, Hormuzd, became the chief god. This term evokes "Great Ormos" in my mind, in Wales, beside Erethlyn and Rhos, noting also that the Persian gulf was called, "Erythraei." It was from this realization that the Hormuz region was understood (by me) to be the beginnings of Hermes. I'll be dogmatic about it, for the northern migration under discussion led to Cadusia, the symbol of Hermes. One may ask if Armenia wasn't named as a reflection of "Hormuz," or vice versa. This has logic because the Aras river (i.e. Hros/Horus) passed through Armenia. Plus, "Hormuz" in Armenian is "Aramazd."

Now behold that Hormuzd was also "Ahura-Mazda," while "Ahura" was also "Asura" (in Sanskrit) so that Ahura-mazda was both Osiris and Horus; it all depended on how one spelled the term, you see. It seems obvious too that Osiris/Horus was made married to a Mazda peoples. Knowing that "da" was probably a suffix, I suspect the Muses (i.e. Mysians) who were worshiped by the Pari peoples. That is, the Pari of Parion (in Mysia) were from the Pars province at or beside ancient Hormuz. I know this now, for the Pari worshiped Eros(!), the son of Ares(!!), the son of Hera(!!!), who gave birth to Iris and Hebe!!!! Plus, it was the kin of the Pari, the Thespians in Boiotia, who built the Argos ship (i.e. Argives were rooted in, or founded, Pars province).

Lest anyone have trouble including a Hebrew side to this golden-fleece bloodline, Eros was the son of Aphrodite. And she in turn traces to the "Afridis" or "Aparutai" Afghans (also known in Afghanistan as the Khybers). Who knows but that these named the Euphrates rather than vice versa (I definitely want to know which is true).

It seems clear enough from the Hermes=Thoth equation that Hormuz Persians moved into Susa (anciently "Shush") = Thoth. Then the two moved to Cadusia together as the proto-Armenians and Tats/Titans. I fully expect that Hermes moved to Tuttul before reaching Armenia. I don't know the reason, but it's definitely an area to explore: that Tuttul is today "Tell Bia" or "Tel Bi'a," while it is said (including Britannica) that Lake Van (Armenia) was named by a Bia peoples. I created the theory many chapters ago that the Lake-Van Bia were the Greek "Bias" and therefore Nahorite Buzites.

I also saw the possibility that Nahor named his first-born, Uts, after the "Utu" peoples of Sumeria (historically the Uties), and perhaps that term became "Tut." While some locate Tuttul south of the Euphrates-Habur junction, Tell Bia is at the Euphrates-Balikh junction (the latter river runs up to Haran, where many say Nahor probably lived). I also know this, that the Taurus cult came out of Utu's cult, and that Nahor's father, and his father, were named "Terah."

Knowing already that this migration had yet to go through Asshur before reaching Armenia, note that Set, at times made the son/extension of Osiris, may depict the Ashur>Cadusia move...if Set = Satyrs = Cadusii/Hades. This migration may have taken place when the Guti came against Agade and destroyed it...wherefore the Akkadians of Agade may have fled to found Cadusia.

Set's wife was Nephthys, what must be an Egyptian branch of the Nephilim. Compare "Nephthys" to the Biblical Avvite god, "Nibhaz" (2 Kings 17:31). In Greece, the Nephilim were depicted as Nephele, wife of Athamas and mother of the golden fleece line. Set must have been closely related to whomever Athamus depicted, and perhaps more-closely related to Nephele's other mate, Ixion (king of Lapiths). Nephele with Ixion gave birth to Centaurs, the relatives of the Satyrs. In myth, Nephele was depicted as an aspect of Hera, who was herself the same stock of peoples as depicted by Hercules. Indeed, Ixion had been married to Hebe (the wife also of Hercules), daughter of Hera. Ixion's sister was Coronis, mother of Asklepius, the latter (and therefore the whole family of terms) being one of the caduceus' snakes.

The migratory line is like so: Tiamat/Atamti in Eden > Dumuzi in Uruk > Demeter in Cadusia > Edones and Satyrs in Thrace > Athamas in Orchomenos/Boiotia > Phrixes and Hermes the ram/fleece > Kutaisi (city of Aeetes where the fleece was hung) > Jason in Corinth and Iolcus > Orkneys, Bute, Arran, Argyll, etc. in Scotland. I would suggest that the Phrixes flight (on the fleece) to Kutaisi was the same migration as the Argos sea voyage to Kutaisi. A main point is that the golden fleece and Kutaisi (the golden grail) are equated; all terms mentioned are of Rus elements from Persian-Elamite roots.

As Set was the Dumuzi line, he evolved further into Demeter's daughter, Persephone = Parthians/Gorgons and/or Persians of Pars province. Behold now a key, wherein I had previously traced the swan symbol to the Rukhs and therefore to Uruk, which now connects to Set. Then recall that the swan symbol was named after lake Sevan in Armenia, upon which shores lived the Soducena (see expandable old map of Caucasia). Surely, therefore, due to the similarity of terms, Set depicted the Soducena Rukhs. That then makes more feasible the Osiris-Azeri equation I had mentioned, in adjacent Azer-baijan; note the "baij" root that might just pertain to Ubija/Opis Avvites. Indeed, "Osiris was identified explicitly with Apis." Apis must root to Absu on the Persian gulf (Hormuz?), because Ra (grandfather of Osiris) was said to be Atum-Ra...who must be Absu's spouse, Tiamat/Atamti.

If Anubis the Egyptian dog god was indeed the Biblical Nibhaz, god of the Avvites, then Nephthys (wife of Set) was an Avvite = Absu peoples, for she was made the mother of Anubis. The "great" Egyptian sun and moon gods, therefore, look like Avvites/Anaki from Persia.

If Tiamat/Atamti became Edom, ditto for Atum-Ra. Knowing that Rhagae/Rhea gave birth to Zeus = Susa, I can only conclude that Rhea gave birth to Isis = Susa, wherefore Ra, the ancestor of Isis, should be Rhea (also "Rey/Ray" historically). Perfectly neat. To find this bloodline in Egypt way, the Ra finger points to the giant Rephaim, for they are alternatively the "Zuzim" (in the Bible). They lived adjacent to Edom, after all. The god, Ziz, of the Hebrew Kabala, might just apply here, and he evokes Isis.

I would suggest the possibility that Set, as an extension of the Soducena, laid the eggs in pre-Israel for the later Sadducees, and may even have been the Sodomites. As Avvites were Togarmites, Gomorrah looks like a Gomerian peoples (Gomer was Togarmah's father). In other words, Sodom and Gomorrah were Cimmerians, which could certainly define Set, as Satyrs were Getae Thracians = Goths = Germans. "Set" might in that light be a version of "Guti." If true, Osiris and Ra depicted Guti, wherefore Hormuz was a Guti domain. Ask if "Hormuz" didn't form "Germania." My view has been that the Guti were Kassites under a slightly different name, for historians must be technically wrong when they say that Guti disappear from history.

If I am correct in identifying Sodom and Gomorrah as Togarmites and Gomerians, where then are the sons of Riphath, brother of Togarmah and son of Gomer (Genesis 10:3)? I would have to say in the Rephaim. If it's true that Isis depicted the Zuzim/Rephaim, then all the great sun and moon gods of Egypt were merely Cimmerians i.e. sons of Gomer. The great sun and moon gods of Egypt, Avvites and Amorites, merely a barbarian Hebrew-Cimmerian mix, were damned by YHWH...as were the German "Jews" who forsook Him in the last century, who were likewise a Cimmerian-Hebrew ("Ashkenazi Jews") mix (for Germans are Cimmerians).

Sad. The time comes when sin is full and destruction must be poured out. YHWH told Abraham that the sin of Amorites was not yet full i.e. their time for mercy had not yet run its deadline, and He let them live another 400 years before he destroyed them (knowing all the time that they would not repent of their "liberalism"). Yet liberals deny the long-suffering mercy of YHWH and stress only His "cruelty." That's because liberals never see all sides of the story, nor do they acknowledge their sins. If it proves to be true that they are not insane or largely detached from reality, then liberals must be deliberately destructive, just as their demons would have it. How else can we explain that they hate YHWH so much while His Son exposed Him as the very opposite of cruel? How is it that they serve demons who are in fact cruel, and yet can't distinguish YHWH's shears as a constructive instrument, used only to prune the disease from the tree, for the benefit of the tree? So, you see, liberals hate God because God is a threat to their god-less dreams.