Previous Update: May 12 - 16

Updates Index



IRAQ UPDATES
May 17 to 21

World-President Brzezinski?



See May 18 -- 19 -- 20 -- 21


May 17


Well freak me out. After writing yesterday on the Shelby/Selby surname and its possible tie to the CELVAPAN flu vaccine, and then finding the Kelvin/Calvert Coat to use what could be a variation of the Shelbi/Selbi Coat (i.e. because "Selb" and "Celv" could be variations of the same family), one of the first headlines I read last night for today's update was "First Army Division East Holds Competition at Camp Shelby." That was not the freak-out. I wasn't going to go to the article at all, but finally did, to find:

"'We began planning the competition last fall,' said Command Sgt. Maj. Calvin Morman, brigade sergeant major of the 157th.

http://www.blackanthem.com/News/Military_News_1/First-Army-Division-East-Holds-Competition-at-Camp-Shelby19875.shtml

Calvin is only a first name, and coincidences do occur, but the Morman surname is conspicuous because I trace Mormons to the Samson cult of Kabeiri...at Lemnos in particular. I've recently considered a trace of the Calvin surname to "(C)Halybe," whom I suspect to have been the leaders of the Kabeiri at Lemnos. The Mormons trace themselves, using myth codes, to a certain Mormon, a "Nephite":

"The Nephites are the de facto protagonists of the Book of Mormon. According to the Book of Mormon, the Nephites were a group of people descended from or associated with Nephi, a prophet who, according to the text, left Jerusalem at the urging of God circa 600 BC and traveled with his family to the Western Hemisphere, arriving in the present-day Americas circa 589 BC."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nephite

The Biblical location of Nephtoah (i.e. in the real Bible, not the deluded Book of Mormon), beside or near mount Gareb, comes to mind, as does mythical Nephele and Ixion. Since an 'N' could be substituted" with an 'H', "Neph" could have evolved into "Heph," and hence mythical Hephaestus of Lemnos, the metal-making leader of the Kabeiri (the Halybes are credited with inventing iron). The main reason that I trace the Mormons to Lemnos is due to the brothers of the Nephites, the Lamanites. The Mormons who concocted these terms were not so clever as they thought. They are tying Christianity with the most Satanic cult ever.

Along with the Lamanites, there were the Mulekites, which correspond to the donkey symbol of Samson:

"The Mulekites establish their capital at Zarahemla, north of where Lehi and his people landed."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mulekite

This is fiction, remember; the peoples and places mentioned did not exist. It's all myth code. The Lehi term is easily deciphered as the jawbone of a donkey that Samson used, for in Judges 15:17, we read that, after Samson killed 1,000 men with the jawbone, he threw it away at a place that was therefore called Ramath Lehi, meaning "jawbone hill."

Therefore, the Mulekites (possibly a play on "Molech" and "mule" simultaneously) and Lehi were the Samson cult to which the Mormons trace themselves. Laman and Lemuel were both sons of Lehi, suggesting that the Mormon schemers traced the Samson cult to Lemnos. I had traced Ixion to Lemnos independently on multiple grounds.

The Mormon schemers added: "Samuel the Lamanite was a prophet in the Book of Mormon sent by Lord around 5 B.C. to teach and warn the Nephites just before the Savior's birth." Why "Samuel"? Moreover, "In the Book of Mormon, Sam was the third son of Lehi, and elder brother to the prophet Nephi."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sam_(Book_of_Mormon)

There was yet another peoples that the Mormons created: the Jaredites. Possibly, code for Garebites without giving it away too easily.

One of my first traces of the Halybes, because they were on the Halys river, and because the Kabeiri were also called Galli, was to Halychyna, also called "Galicia." Both "Halys" and "Halych" mean "salt." The region is a good place to root the start of the Slavs if I'm correct in identifying "Slav" as a soft-c version of "Halyb."

In any case, Halychyna was also called Red Rus when Vladimir and Yaroslav (Varangians) ruled Kiev along with the Slav-Rus. Halychyna was the first place I thought to root Rod, the Slav god, which led me to theorize that David I's HalyRod House was a symbol for Rod of Red-Rus Galicia. I wondered whether David's mother's mother (Agatha) was from Galician blood. I mention this due to an email that I sent Steve last night:

"I just wrote to my Pollock friend about possible ties between her surname and the Arms of Brzezinski. I want you to take a look at the Arms at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tr%C4%85by_coat_of_arms

Do you see three sixes? If so, could this be important, since, if Gog is to be an Obama agent, whom Obama works on behalf of and elevates, I can't think of a better Gog than Brzezinski. He's a Pole but born [correction, brought up] in the Ukraine...in what was once Galicia or Red Rus. I realize that Brzezinski is old, in his early 80s, but his son, Mark, is also an Obama foreign policy advisor.

Then, if the image of the beast is to be a television program, Mark's sister, Mika, is a television personality on Morning Joe.

The elder Brzezinski married a Benes surname, using three cinquefoils (white on black, and vice versa, just like Rodham), and checking it just tonight I found that it derives from the Balneaves surname. Checking that surname, I found that:

"The name is Gaelic in origin - place-names starting with Bal are widespread in Scotland and Ireland. Scottish examples include Balmedie, Balfour and Baldragon...They are derived from Gaelic baile.."

http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/dougfraser/early.htm

It doesn't hurt to have theories. John

To clarify, "Zbigniew Brzezinski was born in Warsaw, Poland, in 1928. His family had moved from Brzezany in Galicia." His surname is thought to derive from that place in Halychyna. Another thing is, I had thought to trace "Rodham" to the same Rod cult. Yet another point is that Obama's mother traces to the Randolphs who in turn trace smack to David I (see OBAMA'S ROOTS IN DAVID I OF SCOTLAND.

Just after Obama claimed that Syria was assisting terrorism in Iraq:

"Three alleged members of a Syrian-based al-Qaida cell are under arrest in Iraq, suspected of helping to sneak weapons into the northern part of the country.

The U.S. military said the men were captured [yesterday] in a residence near the city of Mosul during an operation with the Iraqi military.

Officials said the men are part of an al-Qaida cell led by Abu Khalaf."

http://www.aina.org/news/20090516152530.htm

Khalaf? Is that from "Halybe"? I didn't know about the article until after I finished the above on the Halybes. I think the Halybes founded Halab/Aleppo in Syria. As for Damascus, I root it to Tammuz ("Dumuzi" in Sumeria), which I think was a variation of "Samos." On this topic, Steve reminded me that Chuck Missler was a system engineer of Subsystem I of the SAMOS Program, a highly classified reconnaissance satellite program. Chuck has written on the Nephilim as end-time players, and was involved with a corporation called "Phoenix."

Steve also confirmed that satellite tracking systems for vehicles are standard technology now, available to the public but desired by governments for various ideas.

GOOD MORNING

To Obama's credit, when asked how he feels about Israel's plans to attack Iran's nuclear facilities, said that Israel's "calculation of costs and benefits are going to be more acute," and didn't think his was to "determine for the Israelis what their security needs are." This is music to the ears of Israel's leaders who wish to strike Iran. However, you can bet your broken record that, in closed doors meetings, Obama's agents will give a firm NO to such a strike.
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1242212390277&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

He said, "I've been very clear that I don't take any options off the table with respect to Iran." There's that dread phrase again. Over and over, that's what we're going to hear. Obama is not happy that Ahmadinejad is doing well in the polls, and is sending Iranians the message that another term with the Madman will play this broken record over and over.

The nations are just not dancing to Obama's tune; he's learning fast that the nations want him to dance to theirs. That's the only way they'd love him. If he doesn't dance, he's just another Bush. As for the two-state Polka, we'll see tomorrow how brashly or courtly Netanyahu will be in turning down the dance. We're checking to see if Obama will try to coerce now that he's said Israel's security business is Israel's business, not his.

There's a new "57-state" solution being tossed around that has some popularity due to play-on-words with Heinz-57. In this plan, Israel is guaranteed by 57 Arab states that its security is solid...if Israel allows for the Palestinian state. The problem that Israel knows is, it will prove, from Heinz-sight, to be a big, Hamassive mistake. In Israel's eyes, the 57-state solution is as blood-red as Heinz ketchup.

Netanyahu is trying to make Obama and the rest of the world appear negligent. His argument is that the Iranian threat is the first priority, and only after dealing with it can the two-state idea be discussed seriously. Iran is like the mouse-turd on the Heinz (am I pushing it?).

There is still hope that the 70th Week may begin precipitously in 2009 if Israel strikes Iran. If Iran retaliates by lowering fuel deliveries to the West, the West may be forced to take drastic action in return. Russia is sure to step in and have a self-interested say at that point. All of Obama's foreign advisors will be at the tables hashing out their various solutions, and the Brzezinski circle could lead the way. But I cannot imagine a Brzezinski alliance with Iran...without the biggest flip-flop this world has ever seen. Could the West be so upset with Israel as to betray it with literal vengeance?

I have never understood Isaiah 10:20, where we read that Israel will "lean on" the Assyrian i.e. anti-Christ. This could be the one clue that reveals the anti-Christ as an American. When the topic returns to the same Assyrian in Isaiah 30 and 31, we see God showing much displeasure at Israel's looking to Egypt for protection (30:1-5). But as the king of the north cannot be from Egypt, he could be from the United States since Israel also leans on it. One doesn't peg an American naturally to fulfill the role of an Assyrian or Gogi anti-Christ, but with some struggle the idea could be made to fit all of prophecy. Can we say that Israel is leaning on Russia at this time? On Georgia?

In Isaiah 30:13, we see that Israel's reliance on Egypt will be like a high wall (think a dam), cracked and bulging, that collapses suddenly, with the waters of its tribulation then flowing strongly. No one would deny that the cracks are now developing.

Note that in verse 12, Israel is accused by God of oppression and perversity. Indeed, Israeli leaders are full of deceit as they attempt to worm their way out of their predicaments, and they have shown military oppression. Not that it's necessarily wrong to fight a violent enemy with military, but the accusation in verse 12 is that Israel "trusts" on its oppressive measures rather than simple trust in God. In verse 10 and 11, the Israelites are said to do away with their religious men, that the nation will be led apart from their direction. This is exactly the situation of contemporary Israel, and is expected also under Netanyahu and Lieberman.

Both Brzezinski and his son, Mark, are learned on the topic of Eurasia. At the webpage below, we see a glimpse of the Brzezinski plot to take over Eurasia by starting with the central-Asian republics. This plot could be the reason that Russia entered Afghanistan several years ago, to seize it for a buffer zone before the Brzezinski circle could implement its plan. It would appear that Western control of the central-Asian republics has the purpose of creating its own buffer zone, against Russian retaliation, but also of securing the Middle-East fuel lines. This is at the heart of the continuing Cold War. The webpage quotes a 2001 piece that reads as a conspiracy theory based on 9-11's excuse to enter the Middle East:

"The current Central Asian war is not a response to terrorism, nor is it a reaction to Islamic fundamentalism. It is in fact, in the words of one of the most powerful men on the planet, the beginning of a final conflict before total world domination by the United States leads to the dissolution of all national governments. This, says Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member and former Carter National Security Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski, will lead to nation states being incorporated into a new world order, controlled solely by economic interests as dictated by banks, corporations and ruling elites concerned with the maintenance (by manipulation and war) of their power. As a means of intimidation for the unenlightened reader who happens upon this frightening plan - the plan of the CFR - Brzezinski offers the alternative of a world in chaos unless the U.S. controls the planet by whatever means are necessary and likely to succeed."

http://www.oilempire.us/zbig.html

Brzezinski's world domination book is called, "The Grand Chessboard," which not only implies a struggle against Russia, but may have birth in the Illuminati checkerboard symbol. If so, the book is a call to the Illuminati to take the Middle East by any means possible, and as soon as possible. The page above is, ironically, an attack against the Bush neo-Cons, with Brzezinski painted as the dread Republican to watch out for. He's now on the back of the neo-Donkey, and on the heights of the Obamountain.

Russia today boasted that it is Turkey's largest trading partner, and meanwhile the EU is struggling to get Turkey on board the Nabucco pipeline deal. Turkey is playing hard ball, demanding that it be allowed 15 percent of all gas passing through the pipelines, at reduced prices. This stipulation is what appears to be holding up the deal. Russia appears to be saying, Turkey's way, "you're my cockadoodle-doo, remember." If Turkey betrays Russia by giving Europe it's gas, it could explain why a Russian Gog seizes Middle-Eastern realms before the Americans can get further footholds.

Another article puts the current situation this way:

"'American-European cooperation in promoting a stable and democractic Iraq and in advancing Israeli-Palestinain peace...would create more favorable political preconditions for addrressing the unsatisfactory strategic equation that prevails in the oil- and natural-gas-producing [sic] areas of the Persian Gulf, Iran, and the Caspian Basin...strategic domination over the area, even if cloaked by cooperative arrangements, would be a globally decisive hegemonic act.'"

http://jim.secretcove.ca/index.Brzezinski.html

In the Grand Chessboard:

"It is imperative that no Eurasian challenger emerges capable of dominating Eurasia and thus of also challenging America. The formulation of a comprehensive and integrated Eurasian geostrategy is therefore the purpose of this book...

The momentum of Asia's economic development is already generating massive pressures for the exploration and exploitation of new sources of energy and the Central Asian region and the Caspian Sea basin are known to contain reserves of natural gas and oil that dwarf those of Kuwait, the Gulf of Mexico, or the North Sea.

..."Once pipelines to the area have been developed, Turkmenistan's truly vast natural gas reserves augur a prosperous future for the country's people...

..."Turkmenistan... has been actively exploring the construction of a new pipeline through Afghanistan and Pakistan to the Arabian Sea..."

http://www.wanttoknow.info/brzezinskigrandchessboard

Ahh, now we understand why Afghanistan is important to Brzezinski. He makes the point central that oil needs in the world will increase by 50 percent by 2015, most of it needed by the far east, and a pipeline from the Caspian to the Arabian sea is what will feed that far-east thirst for oil. Brzezinski wants control of that oil. But why? Is his family in the oil business? Naturally, but that family may not necessarily be blood-related, but Illuminati-related.

Since Brz has put this American Plot in book form, how can Putin not know it? It well explains why Russia refuses to assist the West in Afghanistan. It well explains why Russia maintains ties with Iran. It should also reveal that Zhirinovsky's book on Russia's military dash to the Indian ocean and Persian gulf was rebuff to the Brz Plot.

Russia is very upset these days because it sees the Brz Plot advancing. Gorbachev is saying, "Oh no." Putin is saying, "All options are on the table." Obama's job must be to disguise his part in the Brz Plot, but as he's been in favor of Afghan involvement from the start, he's been a lousy pawn for Brzezinski. This is all going to fall apart because greedy fools run the world. I don't fear conspiracy theories because they are the stuff that condemns the world and hands it over to the Son of God. The SuperPlots are the downfall of the globalists, for they are over-reaching, having opinions of their strength that are far too lofty.

Go ahead, globalists. Put into effect your grand plots, and then weep as "your" world comes crashing down. There is a King coming who will checkmate you. Call out your bishops; bring forth your knights; prepare the rooks. But the white King will have the day.

Russia knows that without oil/gas money, it's bid to check the World Plot grows weaker. The king of Russia is on the border, with binoculars looking south. What does he see?

"Two European and two UAE companies said [today] they had formed a consortium to pump enough gas from northern Iraq to kick-start the Nabucco pipeline project to supply Europe, Reuters reported.

The Western-backed Nabucco pipeline aims to lessen Europe's dependence on Russian gas and is opposed by Moscow. Until now, the $10 billion pipeline project had plenty of willing buyers in Europe but little gas to sell.

Two Emirates energy companies say they will partner with Austria' OMV and Hungary's MOL to export natural gas from Iraq to Europe.

Dana Gas and Crescent Petroleum said the deal announced [today] will give OMV and MOL each a 10 percent stake in the holding company that controls the Emirati firms' natural gas operations in Iraq's northern Kurdish region, AP reported."

http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/english/world/11669320.asp?scr=1

The king is flustered: "It has begun. Woe is me. Has my Cockadoodle-doo turned away?" Apparently, yes: "'Besides satisfying local demand, we expect there will be enough gas for the Turkish markets as well as Europe via the planned Nabucco pipeline,' Helmut Langanger, OMV executive vice president of exploration and production, told Reuters."

The king may see a way to disrupt this situation:

"Iraq's oil ministry declined to comment on the plan [today] and said it had received no notification from Kurdish officials in the semi-autonomous region of northern Iraq. The Kurdish government also gave no comment, and said the matter was for the companies involved to discuss"

(article above).

Uh-oh. The Kurds are telling Iraq to mind its own bees wax, to leave the Kirkuk oil business up to their oversight. "We'd like to be your friend, Iraq, but please, there's money to be made; we have no time for niceties right now. Go away!"

Russian could enter Iraq on the platform of helping to rectify this Kurdish delinquency.

There is no predicting Gog (whether a Russian Gog or a Brzezinski-circle Gog) judging by Turkey's mentality of late:

Turkish President Abdullah Gul has underlined the necessity for the United States and the Western countries to be aware of the important Syrian stance and role in the region and dealing with these realities, pointing out to the conviction of many in the west that Syria is main key for the overall issues in the region and nobody can ignore her significant role..."

President Gul, in an interview given to SANA published [May 14] in Ankara, said that 'through our relations with the United States and the European countries we know that these countries do no understand the reality of Syria's stance vis--vis the situation in the region.'"

http://www.sana.sy/eng/22/2009/05/14/226267.htm

Turkey's heart is for the evil axis, and yet the West is courting her. She wants to bath in the powers and riches of Europe, but Russia won't approve of such double-mindedness. Europe will seek to remove her from Russia's arms, and although she is being urged to bring Syria into the European fold, she prefers instead that Europe should take the anti-Israeli position that Syria is known for. Georgia sits between Russia and Turkey, and US-led NATO wants Georgia as a buffer against Russia.

In the end, Turkey could surprise us all by furnishing the king of the north itself. A good argument for this theory is that a Turkish leader could conceivably become a ruler of Europa. As I predict the 3.5-year European rule of the anti-Christ to begin in 2013, is it a coincidence that "The earliest date that Turkey could enter the EU is 2013, the date when the next financial perspectives (the EU's six year budgetary perspectives) will come into force"?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accession_of_Turkey_to_the_European_Union

Conceivably, a Turk could be awarded a 3.5-year rule starting in 2013. As I foresee the False Prophet elevating the anti-Christ to European rule, does this explain why Obama is right-now trying (even with France and Germany currently in opposition) to elevate Turkey to EU-membership status? In fact, he's trying to get that award for Turkey for 2013 because the next possible opportunity (after 2013 passes) won't be until 2020. Remember, the Turks evolved from the so-called Kok/Gok-Turks (i.e. a plausible Gogi peoples)...the same family of peoples (i.e. Huns) that provided the Arpad Hungarians.

As the last-possible freeze passes this weekend, I'm going out to plant some 20 varieties of seeds to see if the drained wet-land beside my house will grow them into food. I also have a nice spot for fruit trees, which I'm planning to plant in a matter of weeks. The wet-land was excellent in that it had killed all the tall trees, allowing only the small brush, which was easy to uproot (with a mini-excavator), leaving the land free of large roots.

The soil is deep and has plenty of sand (good for growing); my only concern is the soil's chemicals/nutrients after being covered with water for many years. The standing water did not allow weeds to grow and leave behind their seeds, though there was grass all over that will return unless I kill it with Round-up. I don't know if Round-up kills for one year, or permanently. Do you have your garden plot going yet?


May 18

One flu-related death in New York -- or so we are to believe that it was related -- and the WHO owl says that wisdom should start preparing vaccines:

"The director general, Margaret Chan, will reveal recommendations for production of a vaccine at the meeting. Pharmaceutical firms are ready to begin production, but many decisions have to be made first -- such as how much vaccine to make, how it should be distributed, and who should get it."

I don't want it unless Mr. Baxter tries it first. Correct me if I'm wrong, but people die every year due to typical, ordinary flus.

I cruise the news every day for hours and I didn't hear that there was a Bilderberg meeting in Greece...until World Net Daily reported it yesterday after it happened (on May 16):

"The latest meeting of the secretive, half-century-old Bilderberg Group concluded yesterday outside of Athens with a few arrests, but little news.

Attendees this year reportedly included U.S. Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner; Larry Summers, the director of the U.S. National Economic Council; Richard Holbrooke, the Obama administration's special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan; World Bank President Robert Zoellick; European Central Bank President Jean-Claude Trichet and European Commission president Jose Manuel Barroso."

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=98469

With such high-level people attending, shouldn't the media try to see what's going on? Shouldn't the media report that something is going on? In a democracy, the media has the RESPONSIBILITY to discover what issues are active when the representatives of the people are meeting secretly. That's why the media exists in a democracy, to inform the people of political events and, where it exists, of political corruption. But today, the politicians no longer represent the peoples, and the media no longer represents the people. The media now represents the politicians who represent the rich and powerful.

If the truth be told, these are the worst enemies of the Muslims. It is they who are seeking to take their oil profits away as much as possible. And they are trying to make us pay for their goods and services as much as Consumerism can bear without falling apart. They know they cannot take too much too fast from us before there is a backlash called a recession.

The article says that "New invitees reportedly include the nouveau riche Google Chief Executive Officer Eric Schmidt." This is what I have suspected for years, that certain Internet search engines can me made spies and servants for the Illuminati. To find terrorists, the government right now makes a list of all emailers using certain key words that could revel them. In the same way, "problematic" Christians are being placed on lists, you can bet on it.

Christians, listen to me. Keep all your trib plans off of your internet-surfing computer; never link that computer with the surfing computer while online. Do not put your personal information on your surfing computer. Do not make internet purchases. If you have ever sent an email with "mark of the beast" included, you could be easily placed on a list for future persecution. Try to imagine yourself as a spy seeking to find all skincode rejectors; the first thing you'd do is make a list of all people who use "mark of the beast." Better safe than very sorry. The article goes on to suggest that the skincode could have been the topic at the Greece meet:

"Meanwhile, Daniel Estulin, author of 'The True Story of the Bilderberg Group,' said before the confab the main topic of the agenda for this meeting was the world economy. He said his sources inside the group told him the movers and shakers would be discussing two options -- 'either a prolonged, agonizing depression that dooms the world to decades of stagnation, decline, and poverty ... or an intense-but-shorter depression that paves the way for a new sustainable economic world order, with less sovereignty but more efficiency.'"

In other words, the leaders of the meeting -- the ones who want to make quick changes toward the new economic order -- are telling the membership that, unless something fast is done by force, the world will be doomed to a long and agonizing depression. It's exactly what Obama and other world leaders tried to convince us a few months ago.

Not all members like the idea because there are great risks in such a plot. Every experiment on a new machine has failures and backfiring. You can't try to enforce a global order without opponents, without those who suffer. You can't make money without taking money from someone. Every dollar earned is a dollar spent. If you rob the people, the people will know it, because they are the spenders.

The secret end-game of globalism -- that some of the Bilderberg members are not to know -- is to rob the peoples, to take what they had worked for all their lives if possible. If they can't make us spend more, they'll take what we spent on years ago. How many properties have they robbed by buying up "toxic" mortgages that tomorrow can be made into money makers? How many businesses are they causing to fail so that they can buy them cheap, then make them profitable later when they stabilize the economy? Manipulating the markets is organized crime on a grand scale.

But God watches, and changes the course of their river. When the 1260 days arrive, Satan will spew a river to overtake God's Woman (Revelation 12) as she rejects and flees from this beastly globalism, but God will manipulate the river, and cause it to benefit the Woman. With eagles wings, powerful and sure, the Woman will escape globalism's plots. Due to our protest, and to what the enemies will seek to do to us in return, God will utterly destroy them. Selah! Selah I say!! Bring it on!!

It's a beautiful morning to get some work done on the house. I'll surf the news later, as the sun gets hot.

[INTERMISSION]

Another article:

"The media have been locked out of the meeting Athens, and a total blackout is operating in Greece, with local media in many cases not even covering the event. One local journalist who spoke with the London Daily News correspondent in Athens said:
'We have been told by senior government officials that covering the event could cost us our jobs...'

...What is there to hide?"

http://www.thelondondailynews.com/bilderberg-blackout-media-more-obsessed-with-hoggs-moat-costs-p-2912.html

The way that the attendees are known is by first inquiring where a certain suspect is going to be on the day of the meeting, and then gauging whether the reason given for his absence from his regular job for two to three days is acceptable or suspicious. For example:

"...But what we have been able to establish from a World Bank spokesman, Alexis O'Brien, is that the organisation's president, Robert Zoellick, will be in Athens on unspecified business on May 14. And that US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner's public schedule is mysteriously empty for the next two days. Jo Ackermann, head of Deutsche Bank, will be travelling 'somewhere in Europe'. Jean-Claude Trichet, head of the European Central Bank, will not be around until the end of the week.

You get the drift. Something is going on. If only somebody would let us in on the secret."

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article6283373.ece

I did say that major media do not cover the event, even though the articles above are in the London Daily and The Times. But these articles come out every year, and are rather benign. They tell that there's a secret, that the secrecy has to do with globalism, and a few more tidbits. But why don't the media inquire from those who are suspected to have attended? Why not call them up, or drop in, to ask what the topics were, etc., and be a little pushy? Surely, when the press is told not to show up, that's when it should show up the most.

My point is simply this, that conspiracies do exist on the topic of Illuminati globalism, and that the press is not working for the people. But my message is always this: do not fear the fools; just stay out of their way, for fools have no fear of God. Vengeance upon them is the LORD's exclusive pleasure.

DEBKAfile takes the position that Obama is responsible for many US deaths in Iraq over the past few weeks:

...Our sources add that in the early diplomatic exchanges between Washington and Damascus during February and March 2009, Syrian president Bashar Assad ordered his intelligence, which regulates terrorist smuggling, to reduce the flow of foreign al Qaeda terrorists into Iraq. But when he saw US presidential envoys visiting Damascus on a regular footing and the start of a thaw in relations, the Syrian ruler felt he could safely lift restraints on the al Qaeda infiltrations to Iraq organized by Abu Khalaf.

In April, therefore, the number of US military deaths in Iraq shot up to 18 in April - double the March figure.

On May 1, after several months of calm, two US marines and a seaman died in a firefight in Anbar province, W. Iraq with a group of al Qaeda suicide killers sent into Iraq from Syria.

The US command in Iraq tried to keep the episode quiet. However, DEBKAfile's sources disclose that it was painful evidence that al Qaeda, enabled by the Syrian regime, had gone back to smuggling suicide bombers, weapons and explosives through its old route from eastern Syria along the Euphrates River into Anbar."

http://www.debka.com/headline.php?hid=6080

Just because Obama came out to condemn Syria publicly for these events does not mean that Obama gives a hoot for the US deaths, or that he's angry with Syria. It was politically necessary that Obama show anger when the cat was out of the bag. What Obama needs to do is to apologize for reaching his hand out to Syria. It was a risk he personally took, and lives were lost as a result. He gambled; he was burnt, and he should lay the blame on himself, not on Syria. Obama knew full well, from the start, that the Syrian leader was a murderer, and a murderer of Americans. It was his choice to befriend Assad; Obama took pride in taking this "new" path.

Will Obimbo make the same mistake with Iran? With Turkey? With Russia? With Libya? In the press conference today as per his meeting with Netanyahu, "Obama said after the meeting he saw no reasons to set an artificial deadline for diplomacy with Iran, but the United States would like to see progress with Tehran by the end of the year."

http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE54H0P520090518

How much nuclear progress can Iran make by the end of the year? How many weapons can it secretly ship by then? How far can Iran go in shoring up the anti-Israeli plan by then? Truly, there is a bimbo in the White House, and, truly, the press that supports him is in the dark as to what's about to happen.

Take pride that God has revealed things to us that the world is oblivious to. We don't go with the flow. The Truth has set us free from that river, and we wait for another Ship. What do we do as we wait? We try to do all that God has commanded us, and we harken to the dangers of the last days: betrayals of one another, and hating one another, and following leaders/teachers that are not leading to the true God. I hope I'm passing that test, but God forbid that I would ask anyone to follow me. God teaches us all; may you look to Him.

There is nothing to say on the Netanyahu meeting in Washington. He said nothing new; Obama said nothing new, so far as the press has thus-far reported.

I recall the missionary from Alaska, Lindsey Williams, telling the world that oil-business "middlemen" (i.e. international bankers) had manipulated oil prices, shooting them up and bringing them down suddenly, unexpectedly, and sharply to put oil entities into hot water. The following story out today may show one example of what was intended:

"The New York Times reports 'Mr. Putin committed Gazprom to long-term contracts with Central Asian countries for gas at a cost far in excess of current world prices. Now that the world economic crisis has sharply curtailed demand for gas, Gazprom is saddled with a glut of expensive Central Asian supplies that it is forced to sell at a loss'.

'It's an extraordinary turnaround from what everybody was expecting,' said Jonathan P. Stern, the director of natural gas research at the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.

...'Gazprom will pay, on average, $340 per 1,000 cubic meters of gas in 2009...But that same volume of gas sells in Ukraine for an average of about $230, while European prices have sagged to an expected average of $280 for all of 2009' - the edition reports."

http://www.geotimes.ge/index.php?m=home&newsid=16549

We now know why Russia tried to more than double it's natural gas prices to $450 last winter. And we also know why Europe wants it's gas from a source other than Gazprom. I think Putin must be furious at all this. Gas was going to make Putin a revered world leader again. He was like a man at a poker table with winnings coming out his ears. Then, at midnight, he lost all, and was turned into a hollow pumpkin with a frightful look on his face...that even the children are not afraid of.


May 19

Obama concerns himself with four evil things but excludes God:

"'It is in the interests not only of the Palestinians but also the Israelis, the United States and the international community to achieve a two-state solution,' Obama told reporters with Netanyahu sitting beside him in the Oval Office."

http://haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1086580.html

Since when does a Christian, while speaking on the status of Jerusalem, ignore God's interests? How far is Obama from God if he can't bring himself to mention Him in his assessment of what should be done with a city that belongs to Him? Why did he go to church all those years? Was he never taught that God is intending to make Jerusalem His holy city? This is basic Sunday-school material.

The news conference, in text, can be found here. I don't have any comment because the public display was done in niceties. In reality, there is a war between Netanyahu and Obama that's only getting under way. What Netanyahu really wants to say to Obama is: "Are you nuts?"

By the way, my Yahoo email account is working again.

May 20

The torment of a constant drip:

"The rival Palestinian factions of Fatah and Hamas ended their two-day talks in the Egyptian capital on [May 18] without achieving any breakthrough bridging internal splits that have undermined hopes for peace negotiations with Israel, according to officials of both sides."

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-05/19/content_11397936.htm

Next. More torment. Another drip-drip-drip:

"Russia has sent more military hardware to its bases stationed in Georgia`s breakaway region of Abkhazia."

http://www.geotimes.ge/index.php?m=home&newsid=16570

Next please:

"A Kurdish plan to help to cut Europe's reliance on Russian gas by piping supplies from northern Iraq has been rejected by officials in Baghdad."

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/natural_resources/article6314948.ece

Can't everyone just get along?

"Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei accused the United States on Tuesday of promoting terrorism in border areas and using arms and money against the Islamic state."

http://www.aina.org/news/20090519143816.htm

The nations toss and churn:

"The United Nations estimates that about 1.4 million people have become homeless since the Swat offensive started in early May on top of some 550,000 people displaced by fighting there and in other regions in the autumn."

http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSISL43525820090519

Is Hillary happy?

"'Providing this assistance is not only the right thing to do but we believe it is essential to global security and the security of the United States and we are prepared to do more,' U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told reporters."

But Hillary. Aren't you and Obama responsible for all those homeless people? You demanded that Pakistan fight with some serious retaliation. You both escalated a war. People are being killed. Aren't you going to mention that part? One and a half million people is not small potatoes. Is it going to get worse?

How sick can it get?

"Scientists have unveiled a 47-million-year-old fossilised skeleton of a monkey hailed as the missing link in human evolution."

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Missing-Link-Scientists-In-New-York-Unveil-Fossil-Of-Lemur-Monkey-Hailed-As-Mans-Earliest-Ancestor/Article/200905315284582?lpos=World_News_Carousel_Region_0&lid=ARTICLE_15284582_Missing_Link%3A_Scientists_In_New_York_Unveil_Fossil_Of_Lemur_Monkey_Hailed_As_Mans_Earliest_Ancestor

It's a lemur monkey, in case you were wondering. Hit me over the head. Zzz...(thanks).

GOOD MORNING

What's so good about it? We're just monkeys with most of our hairs removed. It's no wonder we like climbing trees as kids. Washington is led by a monkey who has yet to evolve intelligence:

"...Yediot reported that Obama's vision for an independent, democratic and contiguous Palestinian state would not have its own army and would be forbidden from making military agreements with other states, in order to provide for Israel's security."

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1242212419666&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

There is more hope for the impossible theory of evolution than for this particular plan to succeed. It's an admission by Obama that his administration will fail to convince Netanyahu to form a Palestinian state. In fact, when Obama announced that he wanted to see a state by at least 2012, it was an admission of no confidence in his own initiative.

A de-militarized Palestine is, at least, a viable option for Israel, but the message about to be unleashed by Obama is, if he doesn't backtrack, and if he's sincere about the idea, is that Palestinians are the obstacle to peace. Does he actually believe that the baboons who elected Hamas, and the orangutans who tolerate Hezbollah, are willing to agree to a state without its own military? The only way that Palestinians would accept such a deal is deceptively: to implement it with an agenda to militarize the state in time.

Obama's plan to involve all Arab states in the peace initiative can only aggravate the conflict. It provides a channel for Arab states to weigh in on the controversy, and of course Arabs consider the problem to be Israel's stubborn refusal to treat Palestinians with rights.

Obama is calling for Jerusalem to be a Palestinian capital, wherefore he's got two insurmountable mountains. I'd say that when Obama is willing to share Washington as a capital with native "Indians," he can then justify his position a little better. How may Democrats think that sharing Jerusalem is a good stipulation for a peace deal, raise your banana.

There's clearly just one solution: Palestinians will need to move to Jordan, Arabia, and Egypt, Syria and Iran, because those countries claim to care for Palestinians. All the Western nations who want to see the Palestinians treated well could pay every Palestinian to make the move. But, the other Arabs don't want them.

Bill Clinton has found a UN job:

"Former US president Bill Clinton is to be named UN special envoy to Haiti, according to a UN official.

ADVERTISEMENT The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the formal announcement would be made at UN headquarters Tuesday."

http://sg.news.yahoo.com/afp/20090519/twl-un-haiti-us-clinton-7e07afd.html

I don't know whether this is prophecy-related news. We'll see if the UN gives him another job one day, in the Middle East. For now, Bill's got his foot in the door of the UN leadership.

What has me suspicious is that, with all the exploitation in the marketplace (e.g. price of gasoline not being uniform with the price of crude), Obama chose to "go after" credit-card companies...but with intent to make very little difference in consumer costs. New laws have just been passed by the Senate, but high interest rates are completely unaffected, though caps have been removed (i.e. the sky's the limit).

On a list of new laws found in the article below, we find that card companies cannot charge fees for phone or online payments. This aspect can speak to future efforts of turning consumers into online shoppers...one important facet, I believe, of the skincode system.http://www.nydailynews.com/money/2009/05/20/2009-05-20_credit_reform_in_cards.html

Since it's impossible to stop hackers from finding ways into computers to obtain information, the skincode becomes a solution. Right now, having someone's card info and pin number is all that's needed to make purchases from any computer in the online world. But under a mandatory skinchip system, no electronic purchase can be made unless it originates from a skin chip, and, of course, no one but the one who owns the chip can make the purchase.

I now have the evidence that Obama has a major role to play in the Kurdish oil markets to Europe:

"The United States in its triple role as occupying power in Iraq, de facto protector of Kurdish autonomy, and political backer of the Nabucco project, should be well placed to facilitate a compromise between the [Kurd] regional and the central government over jurisdiction and revenue-sharing from these gas projects. This issue may test the level of U.S. political influence in Iraq as the occupation draws to a close."

Turkey will be delighted at the prospect of additional volumes of gas reaching its territory en route to Europe.

http://www.jamestown.org/single/?no_cache=1&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=35009&tx_ttnews[backPid]=7&cHash=44d6ce205f

Why is the United States involved in oil deals between Iraq and Europe? Why is the United States a "political backer" of the Nabucco pipeline? Shouldn't Russia view this as an assault against its economy? More ironic for Russia:

"In a move that may give fresh momentum to South Stream, Russian gas monopoly Gazprom on May 15 signed agreements with transit states Bulgaria, Greece, Serbia and Italy to construct the Gazprom-backed natural gas pipeline to Europe."

http://www.neurope.eu/articles/94231.php

The EU is wanting to invest in Ukrainian pipelines to route fuel to Europe from central Asia; this deal with the Ukraine makes Putin "nervous," says the article above. The South Stream pipe will not enter the Ukraine, but, the point is, the Russians must be concerned because, on the south of the Black sea, pipelines from Iraq are set to compete with Gazprom (= Russia's gas company), and Ukraine is bucking to route fuel to Europe without first purchasing from Gazprom.

Is Putin, having won this excellent South Stream deal, going to let America's foothold in Iraq remove the prize? Is Europe now in favor of an American presence in Iraq if it can assure Iraqi fuel? You bet your spout.


May 21

You may recall the incident where a Russian company got a deal from Syria to repair a pipeline from Iraq to Syria, but for an unknown reason didn't show up. It seemed like indication that something may have been wrong between Syria and Russia. Now there's this:

"Russia has put a stop on plans to sell MiG-31 fighter jets to Syria, according to the country's Kommersant newspaper. The plans were reportedly halted due to pressure from Israel, an unidentified source from the Russian defense industry said.

...A source at the Russian Defense Ministry, however, was quoted as saying that the deal had been called off due to a shortage of funds on Syria's side.

...Last month, defense officials told The Jerusalem Post that Israel had decided to sell advanced unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) to Russia on condition that it would would not transfer the technology to Iran or Syria and would suspend the sale of anti-aircraft systems to these countries.

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1242212422695&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

Either way, it seems that Syria and Russia are not getting along. I don't really think that Russia is sincere about its partnership with Israel. DEBKAfile reports what should be closer to the truth:"Wednesday, May 20, the official Russian arms export company Rosoboronexport announced the deal was off without explanation. Industry sources then released a mixed bag of pretexts." The article then gives another reason"

"DEBKAfile's military and Iranian sources report that Moscow cancelled the $1 billion dollar sale because Tehran withheld funding as a cautionary step for Damascus against its going too far in its flirtations with Washington and Ankara."

http://www.debka.com/headline.php?hid=6085

DEBKAfile either knows things that others don't, or it makes up a lot of stories, I still don't know which. But what we do know is that the AyaToldYou Co-Maniac came out to tell the world some days ago that he is not happy with Obama. And Hillary now reports some tough talk, but only talk:

"In an appearance before a Senate Appropriations panel, Clinton reiterated that the Obama administration opposes Iran achieving nuclear weapons capability and emphasized that it is relying for now on diplomatic pressure to stop it."

What diplomatic pressure? What pressure of any sort is being laid on Iran? It must be Top Secret. Hey, for all I know, maybe it's happening, but Iran ain't scared so far:

"Iran test-fired a missile capable of striking Israel, U.S. Mideast bases and Europe [today]...

...Israel said the test appeared to be Iran's response to a positive meeting on Monday between Obama and new Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090520/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_iran

In Somalia, "Leaders of the Islamist al-Shabab group [who have taken over Somali regions lately] have admitted having links to al-Qaeda and global jihadists." Ethiopia has sent some troops to check al-Shabab, and the UN is being asked to help out.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8060045.stm

The first test of whether Israel will obey Obama is under way. Hillary has put forth Obama's demand in no soft official language:

"'We want to see a stop to settlement construction, additions, natural growth - any kind of settlement activity,' declared Clinton in some of the Obama administration's clearest comments to date on what it expects from Israel. She was speaking to Al-Jazeera..."

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1242212425689&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

What you want on this matter is the business of Israel alone; you're an intruder by making such demands. If you base your friendship on whether or not you can control Israel, you're no friend of Israel, and Netanyahu knows it. You're going to need to force Israel's will openly, Obama, for all the world to see. Or else back off. Even the majority of US senators has seen that Obama is ruining friendship with Israel:

"A vast majority of US senators on [May 19] urged President Barack Obama to mind the 'risks' to Israel in any Middle East peace accord as he presses for a two-state solution to the six-decade conflict...76 of the 100 senators wrote Obama in a letter released to reporters.

'Without a doubt, our two governments will agree on some issues and disagree on others, but the United States friendship with Israel requires that we work closely together as we recommit ourselves to our historic role of a trusted friend and active mediator,' they wrote."

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gYaDFEzo2OQggN0_RxnjXdjc4GrQ

From a worldly point of view, there is still hope for Israel so long as 76 U.S. senators understand its predicament with Obama's intrusive strategies. If a landlord has the right to evict a bad tenant, then Israel has a right to evict Palestinians out of the country if they do not respect Israel. And, of course, God has the right to evict Israelis if they do not respect God and/or look to others for security.

The problem that Democrats had under Bush, that they weighed in only part of reality when coming to conclusions, still affects Obama to this day:

"President Barack Obama on May 13 reversed a decision to release photos showing abuse of 'war on terror' detainees, saying he feared it would cause a backlash against American troops abroad.

http://www.mmorning.com/ArticleC.asp?Article=6837&CategoryID=6

If Obama used his head in the first place, he wouldn't need to flip flop. His only purpose in publicizing the photos was to smear Republicans, but his own military convinced him that the other side of the coin was more important than his hatred. At least Obama has the sense, now, to agree, but only because people in high places have pointed out his stupidity. Obama is an intelligent-stupid man, a man with knowledge but little wisdom. If he had wisdom, he wouldn't be a loyal Democrat in these days when Democrats are led by amorals, immorals and demoralizers.

Obama will soon need to admit another mistake, once again by the advice of his own military:

"The Pentagon says U.S. soldiers are still finding large numbers of Iranian-made weapons in Iraq, despite's Iran's denials.

Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell says a large cache of Iranian explosives was found a week ago, and the top U.S. general in Iraq recently told reporters about another large find.

Morrell says the military also sees evidence of Iranian training among Iraqi terrorist groups."

http://www.aina.org/news/20090519144732.htm

The call to anti-Israeli men of Egypt's military has just gone out:

"In the latest bout of the public relations war between Hezbollah and the Egyptian regime since the discovery of an alleged terror cell in Egypt, Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah praised the Egyptian army for its 'heroic' history in wars against Israel."

http://www.thedailynewsegypt.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=21849

The article goes on to give a benign reason for the statement: "Nasrallah's praise of Egypt's army 'is an attempt by the Hezbollah leader to limit the damage [resulting from] the discovery of the cell.'" Regardless, the statement urges the Egyptian military's heart to come on-side the Hezbollah agenda.



NEXT IRAQ UPDATE




Updates Index