Previous Update: March 15 - 19

Updates Index



IRAQ UPDATES
March 20 - 23, 2009

Obama: I Know Nothing.



Go to March 21 -- March 22 --


March 20


Richard Haass, president of Council on Foreign Relations, reveals that the American illuminati wants Israel to survive, but for the purpose of removing the dark clouds hanging over the Western world. He wrote:

"During a recent visit to Damascus, I was told by a senior official that Syria is prepared to forge a separate peace [with Israel] -- a bilateral agreement that would not include a resolution of the Palestinian issue [sounds too good to be true]. Syria also seems prepared to distance itself from Iran [sounds unbelievable]. The people I met in Damascus seemed far more interested in building relations with Iraq, a multiethnic Arab country on Syria's border, than in remaining close to the theocratic Shia regime in Tehran."

http://www.newsweek.com/id/186954

If this were spoken by a mere opinionator, it would be all to easy to yawn. But as president of what many say is a leading globalist organ of those who call the shots in Washington, Haass can be taken more seriously. What he's saying may not be personal fancy, but what he knows is already "shaking" and coming down the pipes. It sounds very much like the report of an article not many days ago, about Obama forming a Syrian Baath coalition with Iraq and meanwhile abandoning Iran. I get it, that once Syria abandon's Iran, Syria will get back (from Israel) the Golan region that it has been demanding as a condition for official peace.

If this happens, you just watch Christian websites announce that the Syrian president is the anti-Christ making the Daniel 9:27 peace covenant with Israel.

I just happened to find what may be a related article in the Washington Post. It has to do with the political playing field of Iraq as it heads into national elections late this year. It's the best I've seen on the topic so far. In short, president Maliki is strongly considering a coalition government with a Sunni leader, Saleh al-Mutlaq, and secularist Allawi (former Iraqi prime minister). Mutlaq, furthermore, and Maliki, want to see Mutlaq's Sunni fold join forces with ex-Saddam Baathists.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/19/AR2009031902885.html

Hmm, I've been seeking clues, and the above coalition could very well be one, for Maliki's invitation to Baathists into his own coalition because he knows Baathists are being turned against his government by the United States. Hmm. Big Hmmmm.

I imagine that globalists are beginning to wonder whether their boy Obama can get anything right. European leaders are loath to repeat his method of bail-outs, and are suggesting that money go to the poor instead of big corps. Obama has said he will take the blame for the AIG scandal, except that it's Bush's fault, he says. Hahaha, what a ninny. He can't even take the blame properly!

The blame now appears to go to Bernanke, leader of the Fed, unless he's taking the blame to cover the rumps of the White House: "AIG informed the US Federal Reserve three months ago that it would pay the bonuses on March 15, but the Fed failed to notify Treasury or White House officials until the last minute, The Washington Post reported Thursday." He's in big trouble.
http://sg.news.yahoo.com/afp/20090320/twl-us-politics-insurance-public-aid-aig-7e07afd.html

Leading Democrat, Harry Reid, is on the one hand acting outraged by the AIG bonuses, and yet he appears to be at least partially responsible in a very direct way:

"A new revelation in the scandal surrounding AIG's decision to pay multi-million dollar bonuses to executives -- a provision that would have restricted companies receiving federal government bailout aid from paying bonuses was quietly stripped from a bill last month.

The measure, introduced by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR), was removed by negotiators in a late-night, close door meeting. In the negotiations, senators agreed to limit executive compensation but decided to forgo barring excessive bonuses -- in fact, they specifically exempted it.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) (above right) dodged a question about the decision when asked by a reporter.

...Meanwhile, the Associated Press reports that the White House knew AIG executives would be paid hefty bonuses well in advance of their self-professed 'outrage.'"

http://www.prisonplanet.com/senate-quietly-stripped-measure-restricting-bonuses-from-bailout-legislation.html

Clearly, the Dems have been caught giving money to their political contributors. Dodd's political ambitions received large sums from AIG, and in total the company gave Democrats nearly a million dollars. If Obama and team were not acting so outraged when in fact they intended the bonuses to be paid, they might be forgiven sooner by the American people. The world is getting a glimpse into the real man.

If globalists picked Obama for president, it wasn't for his political experience, but for his love of Muslims working in cahoots with the Alliance of Civilizations. This, I now realize, is Plan A: to subdue Muslim aggression with a globalist effort. Plan B is to sink Israel if Plan A doesn't work. Part of Plan A appears to be the following:

"Henry A. Kissinger, who is 85 years old and the architect of the original detente policy with the Soviet Union in the 1970s, led a group of former U.S. officials known as the 'wise men' on a visit to the Russian capital [today]. They are advocating a new round of international arms reductions talks intended to eliminate all nuclear weapons."

http://www.iht.com/articles/2009/03/19/america/moscow.php

The wise men are scared, really scared. They see Armageddon from a distance and they seek to curb it.

Well, well, look at what came out a couple of days ago, though mot in the big media:

"An unnamed former highly-placed U.S. intelligence official has broken silence and says that America may soon be abandoning Israel in favor of the Arabs. 'This is just the beginning', he said, 'Israel could be about to lose the support of the United States.'

The source made these remarks in an exclusive interview with Douglas J. Hagmann, the director of the Northeast Intelligence Network.

...In his report, the unnamed intelligence source told Hagmann, 'I have every reason to believe, based on what I've seen at my level of [security] clearance especially over the last several years, that Israel will soon be completely on their own...or worse.' He explained this would happen 'when our administration provides more support to Arab countries [with] financial and military aid, undercutting Israel's defense efforts all while pushing Israel to succumb to the pressure of unreasonable demands designed to end with their political annihilation as a nation."

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/130501

The source appears to be a Biblical Christian painting an Armageddon scenario, but as you know, I tend to see what he's seeing, and so do many other Christians. What I'm not yet ready to announce is that there is a Plan A already to lead Israel to political annihilation. I think that's Plan B, but, of course, if lowly I can predict that Plan B will require implementation due to Israel's resistance of Plan A, so can the lofty Obama people.


Bark, I went down to GoneTanamo and got this hair puller, this toenail remover, and the dreaded waterboarding kit. Do you think Ned Yahoo will cave in now?

Close Killary, but he's tough as nickels. I think we're going to need something special.

Bark, I've got no patience for this. Either Ned...

What if we reel in our Israeliana life line?

How can we, without the Friends of Israeliana going nuts?

Well, then, we'll empower Israeliana's enemies.

How? Without being caught?

Make Israeliana look like Goliath, and Palaza Tiny look like boy David with a slingshot.

I think it's time...

You mean it? You really do?

Yes, Killary. Go give Hamass a great big kiss, and say it's from me. Make Mr. Yahoo cringe.

Who ever heard of the following before:

"A U.S. State Department official was on hand this week for the inauguration of a new training base in Jericho for an emerging Palestinian Authority army...

The base is part of an American policy to strengthen the PA armed forces with American training and equipment, except for weapons, which are provided by Arab countries. The objective is to change an overstaffed and corrupt system to an orderly authority that can take over security in Judea and Samaria and prepare the PA to become an independent country.

...The Jericho center is capable of training up to 700 men at a time and is the first of several facilities planned for Arab security forces throughout Judea and Samaria. By the summer, 1,700 soldiers will have completed the training under the supervision of U.S. army General Keith Dayton."

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/130508

This article comes from the same media (israelnationalnews.com) that quoted the above-mentioned unknown intelligence source that Obama plans to arm Palestinians in an effort to overcome Israel. I checked the Dayton Coat, and found a black and white shield, but more importantly, that the surname derives from "d'Auton." That is, one from Auton, France. This is one place to which I trace the Ethiopian (proto)Merovingians and Nebelungs.

Zzzz...

GOOD MORNING

America's got his hands around Obama's throat, so he goes on Jay Leno to say, "Let's not take this so seriously. I'm a nice guy. Leno likes me. The crowd's laughing with us."

Obama has slipped on his flip-flop sandals and started his official bath in the Tehranosaurus Rex's cesspool:

"US President Barack Obama [today] launched a historic direct appeal to the Iranian people...

...'I hope very much that the Iranians will take good attention of what has been said by President Obama,' Solana stressed.

Russia's Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov also welcomed the statement. 'The start of substantive dialogue will facilitate the revival of trust in the exclusively peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear program.'

Without specifically restating US allegations of Iran's support of terrorist activities or its nuclear program, Obama said 'the United States wants the Islamic Republic of Iran to take its rightful place in the community of nations.'

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090320/ts_alt_afp/usirandiplomacyobama_20090320102611;_ylt=AjpEU8DWg.kF2gI9ReWzq8AGw_IE;_ylu=X3oDMTE2ZWkydWU0BHBvcwMxBHNlYwN5bi1yLWItbGVmdARzbGsDZXYtb2JhbWFzZWVr

This has the Alliance of Civilizations written all over it (Iran is a member). I think I can see where this is going. I think I can see that Obama, in order to justify this new friendship, will downplay, as Russia has been, the nuclear ambitions of Iran. Iran will promise him that there will be no nuclear weapons, and Obama will make statements to the world that Iran is to be trusted.

Yes, for Obama knows from the outset that his hand outstretched to Iran is useless if he repeatedly antagonizes with the nuclear issue. The fact that he has decided to start officially his befriending of the terrorist nation is evidence already that he plans to marginalize Iran's nuclear ambitions. The attempt to spread the skincode to Iran may be at the root where we read, "Obama highlighted the potential for 'greater opportunities for partnership and commerce.' All of these things were said in video on Iranian networks.

Here is what will be ironic. The West thinks that the way to stave off an Armageddon scenario is to betray Israel and make friendships with Muslims, when in reality Armageddon is the result of God's wrath on the Muslims who invade Israel. The West is about to gamble that there is no God, and that therefore the Biblical prophecies are to be disregarded. We know that Obama is disregarding Biblical prophecy because he has just said, "We know that you [Iran] are a great civilization, and your accomplishments have earned the respect of the United States and the world."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20090320/pl_bloomberg/a7jsqlth_fpe_1;_ylt=AkOWiuTJVOpQJ6GTl6vQaRPZa7gF;_ylu=X3oDMTE2c2U0MGQxBHBvcwMxBHNlYwN5bi1yLWItbGVmdARzbGsDZXYtb2JhbWF0ZWxs

Obama told Jay Leno that the First Dog of the White House is coming soon. Wrong, Bark, this will be the second dog.

I don't know if I want you in my cesspool anymore, ObamaSoarus.

Why not Rex?

You stopped soaring.

I'm aiming to fix the bad impressions, Rex.

How? By going on Leno, what no other president has stooped to? My pool was built for great and rising carnisoarus' and terrordactyls. You look like a dodo.

I'm a bit out on a limb, I'll admit...

The ReapUpPelicans are trying to cut your limb down while you're doing a high-wire act on it. This is not someone I need at the moment.

I'm not going down without a fight. They may get my nest AIGs, but this bird can fly with the sun god, you just watch.

Okay Soarus, I'll watch. Who's your sun god?

AllahSoarus Solanthropod, of course.

Okay, tell you what. You come back arm in arm with him, and you can lounge together on the patio. We'll uncork a sparkling campaign bottle, and talk Allahance of Civilizations.

DEBKAfile had an article a couple of days ago that I've not seen anywhere else. The claims are rather startling, and may involve the Obama plot to arm Palestinians against Israel. The idea that Obama is actively arming Palestinians to topple Israel is something heard by me for the first time last night. It's a wild idea but may certainly jibe with the role of the False Prophet:

"DEBKAfile's military sources disclose that Saudi intelligence services are deep in recruitment for a new radical Islamist terrorist militia in the southern Gaza Strip towns of Deir al Balakh, Khan Younes and Rafah, with Egyptian blessing. More than 1,000 Palestinians have joined up in two weeks, poached from the extreme Hamas fringes and the Salafi sects.

...The new Gaza group is intended to complement the pro-Saudi organization established in southern Lebanon in January, part of a new Riyadh project to establish a chain of Islamist, Taliban-style fighting cadres under Saudi control for combating the pro-Iranian and al Qaeda terrorist organizations strung across the Middle East.

The Saudis are pumping into southern Gaza weapons, cash and dozens of military instructors for a strong infrastructure. This flow could not have taken place through Egyptian territory without Cairo's knowledge and approval."

http://www.debka.com/headline.php?hid=5970

Since both the Saudis and Egyptians are pro-West (to a superficial degree, anyway), it's possible that this movement of arms into Gaza, which has the ability to fully replace the lost opportunities of Gaza arming from Iran and Syria, is an Obama-sponsored secret operation. We know that Obama wants to act quickly, that he wants to be a global success story rather than doing the right thing, and that he keeps a secret Palestinian love.

The article points out that Saudi weapons are going to Palestinian groups more militantly-opposed to Israel than Hamas. I disagree with DEBKAfile, however, where it suggests that the operation is opposed to Iran and al-Qaeda. This would merely be the false front put forward by the Saudis, when they are caught, to justify the movement of weapons into Gaza. DEBKAfile also points out that the West Bank Fatah party has never officially recognized the Israeli state. Watch your back, Israel.

It's not all the way on the backside of my mind these days that Gog could be propped up in Iraq by Obama himself. Perhaps this is the meaning of the False Prophet sending fire from the sky on behalf of Gog's kingdom. The implication of this Revelation picture is that the False Prophet is popular in the world at that time, so that his military allegiance with Gog raises Gog to high recognition. If it's true that Obama has decided to go into all-out war with Israel, his recruiting an anti-Israeli in modern Magog is logical.

This is too hasty, however. The report leaked recently that Obama is about to abandon and turn on Israel may merely be scare tactics...to get Netanyahu more pliable toward a Palestinian state. The trick is to correctly interpret the underlying activities rather than to believe what Obama says publicly, and yet there must be instances when what he says publicly is corroboration of under-table activities that he's ordering. He now knows that he'll need a pre-concocted justification for anything that he may be caught red-handed with.

Now that months have passed since I asked the question, let me ask again: how will Obama publicly justify (if he is the False Prophet) an alliance with the anti-Israeli Gog? Probably not for Gog's animosity toward Israel. Perhaps in the name of fighting the bad guys...in the same way that Saudi intelligence is now arming Gaza in the name of opposing the Iran-axis terrorists. However, Gog won't like this because he will wish to side with the Iran axis, by which I mean to point out that some other bad guys will need to become the justification for the Obama-Gog alliance.

Maliki comes to mind. Obama and Gog will both desire to topple Maliki. Maliki's growing alliance with Mutlaq (mentioned earlier in this update) is interesting because Mutlaq is anti-American. The developing picture sits perfect with what I've been expecting: a Gog alliance with Baathists who together topple the Iraqi government and at some point form an alliance with the American False-Prophet president. Part of the developing picture, if it is true at all (I'm being careful here, not to introduce baseless reports), is Obama's plot to use Baathists to topple Maliki.

I am reminded that Henry Kissinger was involved heavily with secret Saudi talks, and that he's now in Russia paving a road for Obama's hand-extending, restart-button-pressing visit. Hmm.

In the same article quoted above concerning Kissinger's Moscow visit, we find: "James A. Baker 3rd...was [simultaneously] in Moscow for a conference on the politics of Caspian Sea oil and natural gas riches that Russia and the West are maneuvering to access." James Baker is another Saudi insider, and, the bigger point is: Could the joint US-Russia "maneuvering to access" Caspian oil have anything to do with setting Gog up in Iraq...since northern Iraq is very close to the Caspian sea? In the Kirkuk region, there's yet another oil tap that remains up for grabs. Could this be on the Baker agenda?

Recalling from above that U.S. army general, Keith Dayton, has been put in charge of training a Palestinian army in Jericho, note that the chief of the English Baker Coat uses a white lion on black, the same symbol in the English Dayton Coat.

Note too that the Baker surname belonged to the Anglo-Saxons and was first found recorded in Durham, originally Dunholme. The Meschines of Durham (to which I'm routing Obama's mother's bloodline) are now connectable to the Bakers because the English Meschin Coat uses white scallop shells on black, as does the Baker Coat. Note that both Coats use what I'm assuming is the Sinclair wave design.

Interesting along possible Baker line of surnames is the white stars on blue of the German Becker/Bekker Coat, as well as the black and white checks. In Scotland, the white stars on blue belonged to Moray, a region of the More Sinclairs, in my opinion. It could just be that the Sinclair wave was adopted from the Baker family since, in Germany, the Beck surname meant "stream." In fact, the German Baker Coat uses a wavy bar. At that link we learn that the baker surname was rooted in "Beck," meaning a baker, but at both the English and German Beck-Coat pages, we find that this surname derives from "bach, meaning stream.

Since the Meschines of Durham were from Bayeux (in the Bessin, Normandy), named after the Baiocasses Celts/Gauls, it's conspicuous that the Baker-Coat link derives the surname from "the Old English 'baecere,' meaning 'baker'." Ignoring the baker definition, the "baecere" term smacks of "Baiocasses." I had years ago suggested (in my Laden book) that the Baiocasses were named after the bee, and so I'll point out that the Becket surname (a possible variation of "Baker/Beck") is said to possibly derive from a Becket locality in Berkshire, the town's name itself derived from "beo-cot," meaning "bee cottage/shelter." Amazingly, "Baiocasses" looks as though it should be interpreted as Baio-casa = bee house!

Moreover, the Becket surname was first found in Cheshire (!!!) and Norfolk. Cheshire was where the Durham Meschines moved to and ruled -- as Meschins of Dunham Masci -- and Norfolk is where the Dunham surname (= Obama's mother) was first recorded! I'm convinced already that the Bakers were not bakers, but carriers of the Baiocasses name, and that they merged with the Meschines in Dunholme, and for that reason ended up in Cheshire as well.

These discoveries, which I think are significant, have been made possible only because my mother's mother was a Masci. Otherwise, I would not have dug deeper on this little Baker study this morning.

The Baiocasses are sometimes traced by others to Bohemians because they are named after a Boi(i) peoples...perhaps explaining the origins of the Bohemian Grove (an Illuminati park/complex in California) through the Baiocasses.

I should also mention that the Baiocasses "were apparently a subtribe of the tribe Lexovii in the Roman province of Gallia Lugdunensis..." (italics mine). I'm expecting the Ligor founders of Leicester to be related to the Obama bloodline, and since Leicester was named, "Legro," by the Romans, it evokes the Lexovii. For new readers, I am tracing the Obama bloodline back through the Ligurians further back to Obama's African Luo, and related Luyia tribe, of long ago. It's a wild shot, I'll admit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baiocasses

I don't know how I missed it, but in consideration of Leicester's cinquefoil (= "five petals") symbol, the Leicester article at Wikipedia says that the city "became one of the five boroughs (fortified towns) of Danelaw."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leicester

At the Danelaw article, I found: "the Five Boroughs of Leicester, Nottingham, Derby, Stamford and Lincoln." I also found that the Danelaw period was started by Halfdan Ragnarsson. The surname there is similar to Rollo's father, Ragnvald. This is conspicuous due to an earlier consideration for a trace of the cinquefoil symbol to five ports (anciently "Cinque Ports") touching on the Regni Celt region (part of the Atrebates). It could be that the Dane Rus had a preoccupation with the number five because they were Rosicrucian roots (five petals on a rose, five points to the Rosicrucian star). One of the Cinque Ports was Hastings, suggesting that all five were important to the Danes of the Conqueror Sinclair.


March 21

The reason that we shouldn't fear everything that globalists are plotting is because globalists have much to lose if they push too far. Case in point:

"Death threats have been pouring in since the [AIG] brouhaha broke, the company said, and its workers are taking no chances.

'It's scary,' one executive said, speaking on condition of anonymity because he feared retribution. 'People are very, very nervous for their security.'

" ...Corporate officials advised employees in a memo posted on Gawker.com to avoid wearing the company logo, in an effort to keep from drawing attention. Workers were also urged to travel in pairs at night and park in well-lit areas."

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/mar/21/death-threats-worry-aig-execs/

International billionaires have not the ordinary bloke to fear, but the fellow corporate rich man whose fortunes are harmed by inappropriate schemes and scams. Madoff is lucky to have the protection of his jail cell.

What happened to the Obama-team scheme? Where is this horrible depression that we were supposed to see? The fact seems to be that the plot didn't work well, and so it was called off. It was perhaps only delayed, but it may be years before it's tried again. Armageddon might come first.

Bankers were not planning on the crash of the housing market. A good number will seek revenge on the oil-price controllers because they indirectly caused the crash of properties and many other types of businesses. Try to imagine the in-fighting on this matter within the banker-heavy Bilderberg Group. I suppose that the ones responsible for the degraded property prices are attempting to compensate bankers by the bail-out schemes.

I hear that property prices are to remain low, and probably go down still more, in the next year. This is not bad news for anyone wanting a second property for emergency purposes. Lumber in my area went down since December, and it was already cheap then.

GOOD MORNING

Obama's speech has landed flat on its face in Iran, or at least the leader who really matters is playing down the president's overtures to bend him closer to Iranian policies:

"Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Saturday dismissed overtures from US President Barack Obama, saying Teheran does not see any change in American policy toward its government.

Khamenei's comments were the first top level reaction to Obama's video message to Iran on the occasion of Nowruz, the Persian New Year.

Speaking to tens of thousands of people in the holy city of Mashhad, Khamenei asked how Obama could congratulate Iranians on the New Year while the US continues to accuse the country of supporting terrorism and seeking nuclear weapons.

I get it. Unless Obama officially up-classes Iran and denounces former down-classifications, Obama is a bogey man like previous presidents before him. For Obama, this news is troubling, for while his administration is hoping for another Iranian president in the soon-coming elections, the Big One of Iran has already, without a night's sleep on it, snubbed the Great One of the Earth. How long and tirelessly had the administration been working on that video release?...And nuthin to show for it.

The Iranians are also pressing the Great One of the Earth to officially categorize Iran's nuclear ambitions as peaceful. It's Obama's move now. If he wants this hand of friendship to survive, in which hand he has placed too many of his eggs, the Great One of the Earth will need to be unusually generous to the Great Enemy of Israel.

DEBKAfile has this to say:

"'We will watch and we will judge (the new U.S. administration)... You change, our behavior will change,' said Ayatollah Ali Khamenei...[today].

Tehran's flat rejection was broadcast by the highest authority in the land and the Shiite world to make its position crystal clear.

...'Have you released Iranian assets?' Ali Khameini asked. 'Have you lifted oppressive sanctions? Have you given up your unconditional support for the Zionist Statements...'"

http://www.debka.com/headline.php?hid=5977

Oh boy. The ObamaSoarus Bird is being laughed at, ridiculed, and toyed with on New Year's Day before the entire Iranian nation. As Iranians have their version of turkey dinner, all the forks in Iran are plunging with delight into Obama's meat. How can Obama stand this treatment to the point of staying cool?

There are two ways to interpret the title of this update: 1) Hey, I'm Innocent; 2) Hey, I'm Stupid." How stupid? Let's watch and see. If he fails, it's be Bush's fault.

In consideration that the ObamaSoarus Bird claims to be born in Hawaii, note the first line of an article out this morning: Hawaii's native avian population is in peril, with nearly all the state's birds in danger of becoming extinct, a federal report says." World Net Daily is still pushing Obama's extinction by doing everything it can to uncover Obama's true birth in either Kenya or Indonesia.

Last I heard, a faction of the Supreme Court has, under pressure from mounting cases, decided to hear a mover who's hoping to bring a case against Obama that reveals his presidential position to be unlawful. Obama has yet to submit a photo of his birth certificate to the American people. A story is out today telling that AOL has made this a top story:

As Jerome Corsi, WND senior staff writer, explained, 'The main reason doubts persist regarding Obama's birth certificate is this question: If an original Hawaii-doctor-generated and Hawaii-hospital-released Obama birth certificate exists, why wouldn't the senator and his campaign simply order the document released and end the controversy?

'That Obama has not ordered Hawaii officials to release the document,' Corsi writes, 'leaves doubts as to whether an authentic Hawaii birth certificate exists for Obama.'

In its poll, AOL is asking readers: 'Do you have any doubt about Obama's eligibility to be president because of his birth status?'

With more than 250,000 responses, results were nearly split with 47 percent saying yes, and 53 percent saying no.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=90447

World Net Daily has a surprising level of political clout when it's determined to press an issue. Imagine the pain and suffering of the ego-bloated Democrats if WND succeeds in its mission? Imagine Obama's eligibility being front page news everywhere, and the issue accepted in the Supreme Court. I don't see how this story will go away. As it grows, Obama's responsibility to show his brith certificate, and the peoples' expectations to have it shown, grows.

I suppose that Obama's team may succeed in falsifying a birth certificate with the help of an Obama-loving government agency, but the team has already learned of the dangers of falsifying a birth-related document...which the administration pulled from its website when discovered by others to be doctored/fake. What could better highlight the False Prophet than his being a false president?

Of course, if Obama gets disqualified, forcing him to step down, he's not the False Prophet. Who knows? The VP, Joe Biden, may be the FP, since he then gets the presidency. I'm not so much stuck on Obama for fulfilling the FP position as I am a false-Christian, globalist Democrat president for the 2012-2016 period. Biden is a globalist Catholic, perfect fodder for fulfilling the position.

As I read just now the following article, the idea came to me rather abruptly that Zbigniew Brzezinski could become either a backer of Gog or Gog himself. The article stresses the June-30 deadline for all U.S. fighters to remove out of Iraqi cities because time has nearly arrived to the steps of that date:

"...'I tell my guys that tomorrow we have one less day than today,' Colonel Gary Volesky told AFP at his quarters in Mosul. 'We can't waste a single day.'

'We are not sure what will happen after June 30. That is for senior officials to decide'...

...Mosul was plunged into violence in 2005 when Al-Qaeda extremists took refuge in the city after being chased out of the capital Baghdad and its neighbouring province of Anbar in western Iraq.

...Mosul, built as a citadel for the ancient Assyrian empire, is described as the last urban stronghold of Al-Qaeda in Iraq. Volesky admitted the Islamic extremist group has proven a stubborn enemy...

'The insurgents have the ability to regenerate and we can disrupt them, but people have to decide they are not going to support them.' ...'Who are the insurgents attacking? Not us. They are attacking the Iraqi security forces. They now see them as a threat,' Volesky said."

http://www.aina.org/news/20090320082059.htm

As I read, it occurred to me, due to my new belief in Obama's quest to topple the Iraqi government, that Obama's close advisor, Brzezinski, who raised al-Qaeda to life in Afghanistan many years ago, could use al-Qaeda in Iraq as a U.S. ally in toppling Iraq. I then saw that "Brzezinski" is a Russian-like name if ever I saw one, and although he's Polish born, he could per chance have Gog blood. I also recalled my statement in yesterday's update: "It's not all the way on the backside of my mind these days that Gog could be propped up in Iraq by Obama himself."

The entire picture is starting to make some sense: that Obama and his globalist team will link with Baathists and al-Qaeda in Mosul to fight Iraq. Note Colonel "Volesky," yet another Russian-like surname. He's overseeing 5,000 U.S. troops in northern Iraq.

The idea that Obama will actually seek to topple Maliki is not far-fetched when one realizes how passionate he is in removing anything Bush from the world. However, I would not take such a scenario seriously whatsoever if not for Biblical prophecy leading me to believe that a toppling of the Iraqi government by Baathists and al-Qaeda are slated to take place as the very next prophetic event of Daniel 11. Verse 22 has been fulfilled. Verses 23 and 24 are next.

Verse 23 tells that a "they" will come to an agreement with Gog. As a result, the three groups will act deceitfully in a successful effort to rise to power with only a few fighters. The "they" are revealed in verse 22 as the fallen Iraqis of Saddam and the fallen al-Qaeda fighters. This is not merely a theoretical opinion that I hold. It's the truth simply because a huge army did cause the Iraqi army to be broken, and because Osama bin Laden did become a broken "ruler of a covenant," a phrase that portrays various parties aligned in purpose and having a leader.

Now, however, with a Gog that is not at all tied to the Russian government, but rather to the American government, the dynamics of my Gog story would change drastically. I would absolutely hate changing the storyline at this point, having said so much about Russia already. I will betray my own writings, of course, for the developing realities, but I would rather not have misled anyone.

I am at times inconsistent, sometimes because I've been wr...wr...wrong, but sometimes because I entertain conflicting views for not knowing the future. Also, I cannot be as secure in my writings in daily updates as I can be when writing a book after many years of contemplation on the book's topic. As CC has pointed out, I am not a prophet, but a watchman. I need CC to dig into the meat of me; it's far more exciting and fruitful to read emails that challenge my views...but many thanks to all who have written in with the kindest of things.

The good news for me is, I don't foresee an Obama-Iran-Sudan-Libya alliance for the invasion of Israel. If Ezekiel 38 is a true prophecy of God, I should therefore maintain that Gog will be a Russia agent, for Russia appears to be the only Gog-like candidate holding tenaciously to an Iranian alliance. But this doesn't mean that Brzezinski and crew can't support the Russian Gog in Mosul, and it may even prove true that Brzezinski is instrumental in planting Gog in Mosul.

I've been spending the afternoon looking into Brzezinski roots in Poland, and may have lots to say about it. But not yet. Last I mentioned these roots I had traced the surname to the proto-Bruce family of "Abruzzo" and "Pressina" stock (the latter was mythical Melusine's mother). If he hits the news again, I'll go into what I've found.

Wikipedia suggests that "Brzezinski" was named after the Polish word for "birch," but the birch may have been named after Abruzzo elements. Or, the family may have changed its Brez/Bres-like surname to sound like the Polish word (= brzoza) for "birch." I'm thinking Brzezinski roots in the Polish city of Breslau, but what I found today traces him to Pollux of Leda's swan line. You can start figuring this out yourself with a bit of study starting at the website below. Compare the Traby Coat there with the symbols on the Scottish Pollock Coat:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brzezi%C5%84ski

I'll be back tomorrow with a sharing of some interesting emails. I hope. May God give you the love in his Son that he so delightfully values. Joy, great joy, will come. Ask him: Lord, where are you inside me? Show me? How can I find you? What part of me do you inhabit? Will you always be so still within me?


March 22

Look, all of a sudden the fear mongering has disappeared, and the same players who were bringing the gloom are now striving for sunshine for fear of their lives and jobs. Even Obama fears for his job:

"The [AIG] furore has not left Obama unscathed. The normally slick message machine in the White House was stuttering all last week and left the president looking unusually beleaguered....

Though Obama remains essentially popular, the last week has seen a steady erosion of support for America's first ever black president. One study showed his approval rating dropping from 64% to 59%. Another revealed that the number of Americans who disapprove of Obama's performance had risen from 17% to 26%.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/mar/22/aig-executive-pay-bonuses

News has now come out that AIG gave even more than was previously thought to fat-cat executives. Another article says, "Voters are trying to make a judgment about Obama and, to some extent, about the new, mostly Democratic political class now in control of the government. And I think they're trying to decide, 'Whose side are they on?'"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/mar/22/obama-aig-bonuses

I've decided to take issue with writers who are actively seeking to convince the Church that Gog is not the anti-Christ. At one webpage there are six arguments presented by Douglas Berner, and I aim to address them all one at a time. In his attempts to compare scriptures of Gog and the anti-Christ, the writer first asks:

1. What supernatural authority is granted to each leader by God, or by Satan?

The Antichrist is specifically granted authority by God and supernatural power by Satan to rule for a period of forty-two months (Revelation 13:5-7). He will have authority 'to make war with the saints and to overcome them, and authority over every tribe and people and tongue and nation was given to him.'

Are we told that Gog will be granted any supernatural power or authority by God or Satan? The answer is -- no! Gog will have an evil thought and will invade the land of Israel, but on the very day that Gog invades God rises up in fury against Gog and his forces and destroys them. Gog is given no opportunity by God to overcome either Israel or the saints, much less every people and nation. Gog does not have 3 years to dominate Israel. His invasion is completely doomed from its very start and it is a very short and one-sided war. God is absolutely clear that Gog's invasion will not be the least bit successful."

http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:glPmO7DEh8QJ:www.thesilenceisbroken.us/Prophecy%2520Articles/Gog,%2520Antichrist,%2520Armageddon,%2520and%2520the%2520Presence%2520of%2520God_article.doc+gog+antichrist&cd=11&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ca

Note how he places an exclamation mark after "no". I have no idea why he is so strong on that point. Just because Ezekiel's account of Gog does not include every detail on the anti-Christ found in other prophecies is no reason to conclude that the two men are not the same. You won't find in all my book that I have knobby knees, but that doesn't mean I don't have them.

The bigger point made by Berner is that Gog is crushed as soon as he gets to Israel, and that he cannot therefore overcome the nation for 3.5 years. This is assumption; there is no statement in Ezekiel to the effect that Gog is destroyed as soon as he arrives. We are told only that Gog's destruction occurs after he arrives; it could be days after, or years after.

One who is well verses in prophecy can ascertain from chapter 39 that Gog is destroyed after God turns his face from Israel, and that after Gog's destruction, God will never again turn his face from Israel. To me, this spells out a fact: Gog will be destroyed after Israel's 3.5-year tribulation period.

Douglas doesn't share this glaring point, and I can only think of one reason for his irresponsibility: he had pre-decided that he would not teach that Gog is the anti-Christ, and he therefore sought whatever arguments could be mustered to serve as critical differences. I'm saying that he's being dishonest at least to himself. Since he knows the prophecy well enough to write on it, why doesn't he point out 39:23, where we see God giving Israel over to military enemies? Isn't it clear that these enemies are Gog's hordes? Verse 24 says that these enemies were sent for Israel's sins. What enemies can they be? The text mentions none but Gog's hordes.

Why doesn't Berner grapple with the fact that God glorifies himself in all the world through Gog's destruction? It doesn't seem to be the time for such glorification at some point before, or during, the tribulation period. Berner and those who see it as he does need to grapple with their own arguments. If they tried as hard trying to solve their own arguments as they do in creating them, they would see that Gog can be the anti-Christ without textual inconsistencies.

In his second argument, Berner says: "Ezekiel makes no reference to the making or breaking of any peace covenant between Gog and Israel." Ezekiel doesn't even tell that Gog has bad breath, but that's no reason to conclude hard as steel that he doesn't.

Berner is the victim of other far-reaching writers who have convinced him that there must be a phony peace treaty between the anti-Christ and Israel. The only palpable text which is used for this idea is Daniel 9:27, where "the many" are wrongly interpreted as Israelis...when in fact the many are "the many peoples with [Gog]" of Ezekiel 38:14. That is, Gog confirms a covenant with all his hordes, a covenant to attack Israel. The covenant is not broken midway through the seven years. Daniel 9:27 does not tell that the covenant is broken. That is a far-reaching assumption.


GOOD MORNING

This is a good place to make the point that, just because the above-mentioned writer has a bear-depicted Berner surname (a variation of "Brenner"), is no reason to connect him personally to globalist Bernicians or the bear cult of mythical Arthur. It's possible that he's linked, but I don't make such leaps without further evidence. The Lindsey Crest uses a dragon (or so it looks like), and its Coat uses Cohen checks, but this doesn't necessarily mean that Hal Lindsey is a Freemason in disguise.

My leaps are a little different. If a globalist president chooses team players of connected/similar bloodlines, then I take the leap and suggest that there are conspiracies afoot fueled and protected by inter-family interests and discriminations. I'm only corroborating what's being said by others, anyway, that connected bloodlines, often Hebrew, control much of the world.

There seems to be no news this morning on my topic. I may as well tackle Berner's third argument:

The Antichrist is killed, resurrected, and thrown into the lake of fire... He is not buried in a tomb or a mass grave with his troops.

Gog will be killed during his invasion of Israel and will be buried in a mass grave with his troops in a valley that will then be known as the valley of Hamon-gog (Ezekiel 39:11)..."

This argument is slick as a snake, but Ezekiel doesn't necessarily state that Gog, the man, is buried, but rather it could be the army of the Gog nation. The text says, "and they shall bury Gog and all his multitudes." If "multitudes" refers to the soldiers of the Gog-nation, then I would agree that "Gog" refers to Gog, the man, and for this reason I would agree that Gog will not be the anti-Christ. But "multitudes" is surely referring to the soldiers of Gog's allies i.e. the other nations besides Gog, in which case "Gog" may be referring to the Gog nation as a whole...which is a simplification that may not include the burial of the personal bones of Gog, the man.

Verse 13 says that, as a result of Israelis burying the hordes of Gog, it will be "the day when I am glorified." Again, how can this day arrive before or during the tribulation period? If it occurs after the tribulation period, then Gog looks very much like the anti-Christ.

Note, in 39:11, that Gog's hordes are buried "east of the sea." This is understood as the Dead sea. I pointed out in my book that Isaiah 34:10 locates a fire that never goes out in Edom, a locality east of the Dead sea! You get it. There will be a lake of fire east of the Dead sea. In fact, the terminology of Isaiah 34:10, "It shall not be put out day or night; it's smoke will rise forever," is a perfect reflection of Revelation's lake of fire (see 14:11).

Sad to say, prophecy writers make many wrong assumptions. Another is that the lake of fire doesn't exist until after the Thousand Years. But just because resurrected non-believers are tossed in the lake of fire after the Millennium does not mean that the lake is not burning throughout the Millennium. In fact, my considerations on the Biblical term, "forever," is a period that ends at the end of the Millennium...wherefore it refers to an all-Millennium long period.

Therefore, Gog will be among one of the men, along with the False Prophet, to be tossed into the lake of fire for all one thousand years. I suppose that the others, tossed in after the thousand years, may be destroyed completely when this old earth is destroyed (Revelation 21)...at some point after the Thousand Years.

Since the lake of fire is a typical fire burning from the underground "pitch" of the Dead-sea region (so says Isaiah 34:9), the lake of fire will kill Gog, the man. What happens to his soul afterward, I do not know.

Berner's fourth argument can be dealt with concisely, as he's grasping at nothing. He first points out that the anti-Christ will be opposed to God specifically, not so much to Israel, and then says:

"However, Gog's primary target is Israel, not God...There is no reference to the Jewish Temple, or to Gog making any declarations of his own deity, or to any demands that he is to be worshipped by his troops or any other peoples."

These sorts of arguments from silence are easily rejected. Ezekiel doesn't say that Gog has hairs growing out his ears, but that doesn't mean it isn't so. If Berner is willing to make any arguments at all to counter the several similarities between Gog and the anti-Christ, he's got to do better than argue from silence. The fact that Berner argues from silence on multiple occasions only highlights that the Ezekiel text has little/nothing to contradict a Gog-antiChrist equation.

He would be on firmer rock if Ezekiel had said, "Gog will not invade Jerusalem nor enter the city." That would be the sort of evidence he needs to make his case. Otherwise, if that evidence doesn't exist, Berner would be wise not to make any arguments at all...because the level of shame that goes to those who teach error on God's Word depends on the level of recklessness.

I said to God last night that I would speak here this morning on a problem that I have with Ezekiel. I was reminded of it again. Ezekiel's horses. He says in 38:14 that Gog's armies come riding on horses." I can accept horses in Revelation as symbols of war, but in Ezekiel, there doesn't appear to be any symbolic language. The horses seem literal. I don't see riders on horseback in an Israeli invasion, but I'll eat my share of hay if it ever occurs.

I'm not going to deal with Berner's last two arguments because they are once again made from silence. For argument five, he says: "Gog is not identified as having any supernatural power at all. He is not described as performing any great signs, wonders, or miracles." For argument six, he says: "Gog is not identified with Satan or the dragon in any way in Ezekiel's prophecy." Berner then has a nice little chart to make his useless arguments appear scholarly...typical pre-tribulationist style.

I had time to check into Hal Lindsey's prophetic thoughts these days. He's a writer for World Net Daily, by the way, and is therefore not part with the Obama globalists. In fact, Wikipedia says:

"[Lindsey] wrote in an essay on WorldNetDaily that Barack Obama was paving the way for, and demonstrating the world's readiness for, the antichrist, 'Obama is correct in saying that the world is ready for someone like him -- a messiah-like figure, charismatic and glib ... The Bible calls that leader the Antichrist. And it seems apparent that the world is now ready to make his acquaintance."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hal_Lindsey

Lindsey believes, I just learned, that Syria will become insignificant in the Iran axis and in the Gogi invasion.

Joseph Farah, Hal's boss and WND's founder, is a Syrian and Lebanese American who will therefore cover the Gog invasion when it occurs. It will give me great pleasure to read from Hal at that time that Gog is the anti-Christ, and that Hal will prepare trib retreats with the millions he banked from God's people on prophetic books laced with reckless pre-trib-related errors. Unfortunately, some of that money has gone to some or all of his four wives.

I don't know much about Farah, but what I read from him I quite like. He is a radical, rebellious and outspoken against mainstream liberal America, and hated for it. That's my kind of guy. If only he were a post-tribber. Anybody know?

In an article in which Brzezinski is targeted as a front-running globalist now in power through Obama channels, something was stated decades ago that looks much what we are experiencing at the moment:

"According to Dr. Dennis Cuddy, Brzezinski, as TC director, advocated, in a 1973 memo, establishing means for social control over the world populations by deliberate 'economic and political destabilization' so that later the debt leash could be used to 'strangle a rebellious nation into submission (to global governance).'"

http://www.newswithviews.com/Briley2/patrick103.htm

A debt leash? The people are going to be controlled by being chained to debt? Obama? Are you in the throes of creating Brzezinski's debt leash??? If you are, Hell is your destination, and no one will care for your suffering. I would personally stick my fork into you to make sure you're cooked to the bones.

What Brzezinski said is not news. Others have long been making the same claim. But in the 1970s, they didn't know the Internet. This form of people-media now prohibits the globalists from carrying out their plots without some back-firing and shaky advances. People can now communicate and expose the fiends; there's no more absolute-control of the world media...which was the largest-single method to be utilized in bringing the globalist plot to fruition.

Exposure threatens their lives, their jobs, their families, even their corporations. A domino effect is set up when one is exposed, so his friend-in-crime is exposed. One gets caught, he snitches on his "friend." The friend will kill the friend because both are fiends. Word gets around; the plot is put on freeze.

Debt leash or no debt leash, the people cannot be controlled unless they are willing. This is the new globalist realization, and it means that globalism will be advanced by a "democratic" process, not by forced dictatorship. Revelation tells us beforehand that the world will honor the Beast. It may be reluctant or half-hearted obeisance, but we do note no Revelation text making an allusion to a forced rule upon the peoples... though some rebels will be forced to "worship" the image of the beast.

The global game now is to convince the peoples to willingly accept globalism, its rulers, and its agenda. Placing the people further in debt does not work to control the peoples wills, but more simply it robs them. However, the more money that a party can grasp, the more money-power it has to prop itself up in perpetuity. A party can fall to nothingness by the will of the people in a democracy, but money can buy a party survival because money can manipulate the way a people thinks. Ask the Obamatons.

I'm not ruling out the possibility that some fools might attempt martial law on Western nations, but am suggesting this to be an unviable method of operating because it leads to the sudden death of a party. I would be very surprised if globalists are plotting martial law as their method of gaining control over the West. If it does take place, it'll only be because they're fools.

The EU can see the end of its days already. It's not working. It's too big, too hard to handle, too cumbersome. Perhaps they will opt for a swan song, a last hurrah before they call it quits, an overdose on a fantasy drug leading to a strong political orgasm. But then, while still on the wave of delight, disappointment. The people are no longer willing. "Get out," she says, "just get out." Just then, God's flashing sword appears in the middle of it all and slices off the organ to the shrill cry of the swan. Blessed song, the swan cries the cruel death it deserves.

Obama, Brzezinski. Watch your, er...you know.

The new plan by the treasury secretary (i.e. the Obama government) is to purchase the "toxic assets" of banks with partner-investors. The government is clearly seeking to enter an enterprise of great magnitude. "Industry analysts estimate that U.S. banks are holding at least $2 trillion in troubled assets, mostly residential and commercial mortgages." Once the government owns the "troubled" properties, it can wait for property prices to increase before selling them off at a profit.
http://www.iht.com/articles/2009/03/22/business/bank.php

The Obamachine is now predicting that the economy will be healthy in about a year, but I would suggest that property prices will surprise them in a year. I predict that they're not going to rise if 2009 is the first year of the 70th Week. I would also suggest that property prices will remain low until 2013 approaches.

In other words, the government may be forced to sell their toxic properties at a loss because it can only hang on to them for so long before the people begin to realize that it bought them in the first place, not to fix problems, but for financial gain. So, come 2010, the government will need to unload the properties even if the market is low. The inside-partners to which the government has by-then sold them will then begin to sell them to the consumers as necessary, and I hope at that time post-trib "eagles" will be able to snatch country properties on the cheap. Revelation 12: like eagles they will fly to the wilderness, and God will open the mouth of the earth to secure their escape.

Have you ever had peanut butter on Tostitos? Delicious. It's all I have left, aside from some pasta that I'm not in the mood for. Try it. Corn chips are probably not a bad food to store for long terms. The food value may not be great, but they're a happy crunch. I'm pretty sure that Tostitos have nothing whatsoever to do with Gog, though. But they are a good way to say, good afternoon, I'm off; I'll be back with tomorrow's news, and some groceries.


March 23

I'm making the updates longer as pay-back for the extra work in adding the date links at the tops of pages. But long updates are also good for burying private discussions such as the one I am now entering...which is why I don't have a link to today's date (i.e. I'm hoping that passers-by won't get this far).

Food. When we see Gog, and we are all sure that THIS IS IT, we'll all want long-tern food supplies. Freeze-dried foods are the best, in my opinion, but also the most costly. There are two ways, even three, to reduce costs. We can pool our purchases. Imagine making purchases from one company for 1,000 of us. Better yet, trusted persons could be paid to make all purchases wholesale, and then ship the foods out to individuals or individual retreats year in and year out. That way, retreat addresses won't be known by anyone but the trusted persons.

The best way might be for us all to pool purchases of freeze-drying equipment so that we can all make our own freeze-dried foods at home. I'm asking any reader to look into this possibility. Any angels out there? Let me know up front that you're tackling the job, and report back when you're done; I'll share the findings. Better yet, write your own findings and I'll include them in the book's Part Three.

Are there any TV types reading? I would like someone to take the post-trib arguments (help yourself to mine) and make a youtube video for distribution in this book. We're going to have lots more readers when Gog appears in Iraq. People are going to be saying, that tribwatch guy whoever-he-is, he got it right. He's got food programs going. He's got a great little post-trib video that I can share with my pre-trib pastor, my brothers and sisters...etc. Let's all go over and see what's going on.

Are we going to be ready when that day comes? What will they find here? Just a few short chapters on preparation details? Can't we add more info? Dan, how about a chapter on coal burning? Stanley, can others build their own homemade well-drilling outfits? Anyone have a great trib-house design that can be placed online or in this book?

I'm starting the email page for readers to share information, but the problem with an email page is it's great length eventually, and besides it's uncoordinated. Better to designate various topics in separate chapters. People can down-load them and access them in the trib when they'll need them most.

Tribwatch could use a better homepage if anyone knows how to design one. I urge you all to do things for free, and if you've never learned to do so, try. It's liberating. There's payback anyway. Imagine the praise from God that goes to anyone who distributes trib food for free (paid for by the recipients, of course)? Anyone have a large barn or building for the purpose? Anyone want to distribute solar panels and batteries? Anyone want to distribute seeds? Anything else you can think of? If so, write in with an alias email account, and don't leave your personal contact into. I'll take it from there.

Someone could be in charge of facilitating campsites all over the world. Anyone with a large tract of land who likes the idea can then be put in contact with that facilitator. The facilitator will explore the details, possibilities, costs, and legalities of campsite construction and design, and share the info with the land owners. It should go a lot better for legal campsite owners if anyone wants to use their land to house others. I don't see any problems in starting a private campsite as opposed to one open to the public; just make it legal. Post-trib campers can pool their money to pay for the campsite's property taxes...and anything else that's required.

We are the true Illuminati. We work and plan in secret. We work as a family. We work legally, we work for the other and do not think for ourselves, because God has said that if we look after His people, God will look after us. It's nearly time to spread the wings of God and fly like the mighty eagle. The American eagle will catch a disease. The phoenix will lose altitude, and it's fire storm will dim. It will crash upon the over-milked teets of Europa. The cow will dry up, the sacred horns will go brittle, the holy Taurus of Phoenix will be incinerated for it's "mad-cow disease."

But the Eagle of God will find a cliff from which to watch the Son's arising, and His fire storm will be brilliant, noisy, and, most importantly, real, not mere myth, not a feverish fantasy such as Zeus. The fools of the earth will vanish, and the Eagles of God will rule.

Hebe goes dizzy on fermented nectar: "let us drink, for tomorrow we die." Ursa pours out his hot cauldron on Kybele, and Ixion soon lies with blood-soaked mane at the gates to Solomon's stables. Dionysus calls his armies to clang weapons in great and fearful noises, but Apollo stings the bee-keepers, and the Maenads cry out in ceaseless pain. Aphrodite builds her arsenal to the skies; Hephaistos works all night long to build her shield. Ugly Vulcan's forehead sweats in the growing heat, but Abaddon explodes in his face. Venus falls with a sizzling streak to the ground. Nephele billows, filled with acidic dust, her rains falling toxic upon the river gods. Britain cries for its lions to attack the destroyer; Nergal roars out from his dark Lon-den, but in the chaos Atalantis shoots herself in the foot. Overfed Artemis across the sea lies in her sty, her girdle has become too tight, and New York can barely breath or run. Poseidon's waters are in distress, and Jason's ship is tossing. The golden fleece has gone ragged, and Pelops DC has split irreparably.

In Babylon, Uranus is trampled by the Kings of the Sun. Hecate arrives to the rescue with three heads of a frog, but she croaks in the dried-up Aphrodite river. Eros reddens with swamp fever as darkness fills his throne room. Sirus bites his master's hand in fear. Helios grows dark; Selene blushes blood red. Coiled Draco trembles. Horus blinks. Zeus' missiles are silenced from the noisy sparks of YHWH's fingertips. Virgo gives birth to her firstborn, Fright, with her hands hanging limp in helplessness. Nyx goes silent. Iris disappears. Cygnus hides. The Kingdom, awesome Light, appears on the tops of Nephele's dark billows. Pan piddles on the sacred apples of Hera. Ares falls off his horse. The serpents of Hermes eat one another; Harmonia is in chaos upon the mountains of Israel. Hercules is taken by the long hair and emasculated by the sword of the New Name.

Dionysus is forced into the winepress of God; guts flow as a river to the spout. Dryas swells with bloated intoxication. Hera drinks down her filthy cup in haste, but the drunken queen of heaven is humiliated in a single hour. Daphne's pirates lament. Atreus is dropped alive into the burning pitch; the chief dragon burns with grief and screams, No we can't! Ixion chokes on his blood and dies in the unholy city. IT IS DONE. Chain Ladon to his tree, and let him watch how a Kingdom should be run.

Then it's our turn.

GOOD MORNING

Obama is starting to talk some more gloom as he attempts to pass his plot to purchase toxic properties, but look at how serious he is not:

"...in a '60 Minutes' interview in which [Obama] was pressed by Steve Kroft for laughing and chuckling several times while discussing the perilous state of the world's economy."

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0309/20339.html

Why is he laughing? Because the money to purchase the toxic properties is coming out of thin air from Bernanke's printing press, and when Bernanke is paid back from the proceeds of the property sales, Bernanke may or may not destroy the money that he printed in the first place. Obama, for his part in the plot, can be slipped illegal "commissions" by Bernanke and/or the rest of the insider Fed crew. The Fed must have laundromat banks set aside into which illegal pay-offs can be deposited and maintained absolutely private. The article goes on:

"'You're sitting here. And you're -- you are laughing. You are laughing about some of these problems. Are people going to look at this and say, 'I mean, he's sitting there just making jokes about money --' How do you deal with --I mean: explain. . .' Kroft asked at one point.

'Are you punch-drunk?' Kroft said.

'No, no. There's gotta be a little gallows humor to get you through the day,' Obama said, with a laugh.

...'I mean there were a whole bunch of folks who, on paper, if you looked at quarterly reports, were wildly successful, selling derivatives that turned out to be. . .completely worthless,' Obama said, with a chuckle."

I recall being like that when I was a child. I had made a conscious decision at one point to become devious because I discovered that I could gain from it. I didn't stop to consider whether it was right or wrong in the grand scheme of things, and no one was going to know, anyway. But God knew, and he paid me back what I deserved, not one drop missing.

Once, at about age 10, all my friends had a soccer tournament. Just one game. Each player put a dime into the pot, and the winning team got the losing team's dime. But there was an extra dime, so we had to vote on the best player to see who got that one dime. Either I wanted to be the best so badly, or else I wanted the dime so badly, that I plotted with four other players, telling them I would vote for them if they voted for me. But we only had one vote each. I got four votes, but when the four noted that they didn't get one vote, I was humiliated and discovered. It was a good lesson.

The following year, when I had a newspaper route, the newspaper manager announced three prizes to be given to the paperboys who got the most new customers in a certain period. So I invented new customers, won second prize (a new baseball glove),and then called into to say that the new customers canceled their subscriptions. I was sure they had figured it out, but they didn't say anything because they needed me for cheap labor. The following year I started to smoke, and hang out with the sinners. For ten years God gave me up to the sons of the devil, and I paid. Now, I wouldn't dare do anything like that, because the Word of God mixed with a fear of and love for God made me think straight, right, and good.

I raised money for World Vision when I was a young Christian. I went out and got the plastic bread loaves on to retail counters in my local area. I knew I was being blessed because I got about 20 loaves out in one superman day, my first-ever day of going out (normally, I don't perform that well). One by one, store owners/managers just said, "Sure." I must have had a good face that day, in other words.

Without oversight, I picked up the money every few weeks, rolled the coins, banked them, and wrote out a check to World Vision...raising thousands of dollars. I didn't take a dime! It was my test, you see, and I passed it without a problem. I didn't even have the urge to take a dollar. I wouldn't have dared, for God put a new spirit in me, and a new way of living. When a penny would roll off the table to the floor, I would make sure to pick it up just because I was being entrusted.

I was brand new. But some devious boys grow up and never change. They learn the craft of self-serving deception as short-cuts to making gains. They get far better at it with the passing years. By the time they become the president of the United States, they are master deceivers. In fact, there is a belief among many Americans that the best deceivers go the furthest in politics....though I would add that there is some bloodline-luck involved as well.

I know what a deceiver thinks like. I know the look on his face when he gloats for his deception-based successes, because I held those expressions once. I know how the wicked talk and think as adults because I partied with them. I don't know it all, but I have a good idea. I now love what is right and good. It's the only way to find success. If Obama were good, he would do what I would do with the stimulus money: he would channel it first to the poor. In fact, if he were good, he would not take the stimulus money in the first place. There are other ways to deal with the recession. First, expose those who raised oil prices to outrageous levels.

In consideration of the fact that the Alliance of Civilizations works with former national leaders, read this:

"In his latest faux pas Obama managed to pi$$ off France...President Obama wrote Jacques Chirac saying he was looking forward to working with the former French president in the coming four years...

...In a letter described by Chirac as 'very nice,' Obama wrote, 'I am certain that we will be able to work together, in the coming four years, in a spirit of peace and friendship to build a safer world.'

The use of the word 'peace' was taken to be an indirect reference to Chirac's stance against the US intervention in Iraq, which Obama had also opposed as senator.

...French newspaper Le Figaro is horrified at the faux pas. And, current French President Sarkozy was appparently upset with the letter."

http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2009/03/obama-upsets-sarkozy-with-letter-to.html

After reading this, I checked to see if Chirac was involved with the Alliance of Civilizations, and sure enough, he was. One can read his speech at the article, "President Chirac addresses Barcelona 'Alliance of Civilizations' meeting" I don't know about you, but I'm starting to get the impression that the image of the beast will have something important to do with the Alliance of Civilizations. It seems that this movement is about to be used to enforce a new ideal that essentially outlaws Christianity. The first step is to make Christianity politically incorrect with alarming overtones, much as the Humanists do when claiming that Biblical Christians are the cancers of society and must be done away with:

"The final report of the United Nations' Alliance of Civilizations (AoC) initiative was released last month. In addition to its usual goal of combating exclusivist ideology, the report contains some interesting elements:
1)Exclusivist ideology is defined as 'those [religions] who feed on exclusion and claim sole ownership of the truth...

2) The core issue identified to be the bridge between the West and Islam is resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

3) The global and problematic players in this conflict have been identified as the adherents of the three monotheistic faiths.

4) Failure to resolve this conflict will result in a failed Alliance of Civilizations.

http://www.watchmanbiblestudy.com/topics/EuropeanUnion.htm

I get it. Since the failure of the AoC is simply intolerable at this time due to the grave importance of it's success for staving off an Armageddon scenario, the three fundamentalist faiths must instead be made to fail to the point of abandonment of their historic resolve. The article's quote continues:

"Also noteworthy is that the AoC has identified the European Union's Barcelona Process as one of the frameworks in which it intends to operate. For those unfamiliar with the Process, it is the foundation of the EU's political, economic, and social policy. The Process, also known as the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership, is represented as the only platform that can solve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The social dimension of the Process, with implementation facilitated by the Anna Lindh Foundation, cooperates with the AoC and shares the common goal to combat religious fundamentalism worldwide...The objective of the AoC, therefore, is 'to enforce an Alliance of Civilizations against all those who...give prevalence...to a logic of division and confrontation.'

I am proud to report that I am one of those divisive agents, but I plan not to be confrontational because, I think, it's in the interest of God that His Elect survive the tribulation without being murdered. On this topic I have previously suggested to readers not bad-mouth the globalists unnecessarily because it will come back on us in persecution when their dark hour arrives. It is advice I need to give myself because I know how prone I am to bad-mouthing these enemies...of the One who Saved me. These enemies wish to remove eternal life from the masses of the world. How can we be totally quiet? Rebel, yes, and speak out, but do not become politically confrontational because this Beast must arise by the will of God to divide the souls marked for Armageddon from the souls marked for Salvation.

The quote continues:

"Since the Alliance intends to be fully prepared to enforce its objectives by 2009, I suspect that's when they will introduce their symbol. Timing is everything. The European Commission has just submitted a document to the author of the Barcelona Process that it is time to deliver. If the planners of the AoC really mean what they say, may God help us all. -Constance Cumbey"

I do not know what the "symbol" is. I would like to know. Bjorg, if you're reading, please let me know. Later in the article I find this:

"Pierre Elliot Trudeau, former Prime Minister of Canada, was a principal player in the Club of Rome. Of interest he used to have the number '666' on the license plate of his sports car. I once saw a picture of him sitting in his car looking back with the rear plate clearly visible, and with just '666' on it. When asked why he had chosen that number; he replied that it identified him with the Club of Rome, which apparently has adopted that number as a symbol; leastways according to Trudeau.

Javier Solana is also a member of the Club of Rome...

Pierre Trudeau, who controlled Canada for eleven long years, and whose strange speech was always unpalatable for me, was president of the Humanist Association of Canada...as was Henry Morgentaler, the abortionist who did more to rid Canada of abortion laws than anyone. There is no way that the Humanists are not going to be at the charge of the end-time persecution. Know your enemy.

In the Humanist Manifesto II, 1973, we read:

"We deplore the division of humankind on nationalistic grounds. We have reached a turning point in human history where the best option is to transcend the limits of national sovereignty and to move toward the building of a world community.... a system of world law and a world order based upon transnational federal government."

http://www.scribd.com/doc/210635/1973-Humanist-Manifesto-II

The first Humanist Manifesto, 1933, "talked of a new 'religion', and referred to Humanism as a religious movement to transcend and replace previous religions based on allegations of supernatural revelation."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanist_Manifesto

One could say that Humanists are the good Satanics as opposed to the bad ones. Perhaps they are the ones having a semblance of Godliness but denying His power. The Manifesto II speaks openly on Christianity:

"We believe, however, that traditional dogmatic or authoritarian religions that place revelation, God, ritual, or creed above human needs and experience do a disservice to the human species. Any account of nature should pass the tests of scientific evidence...We find insufficient evidence for belief in the existence of a supernatural; it is either meaningless or irrelevant to the question of survival and fulfillment of the human race. As nontheists, we begin with humans not God, nature not deity."

http://www.garymcleod.org/1/ConstitutionSoc/humanist.htm

Humanism is extremely pervasive in the minds of people we live and work around. It is the leading ship in modern liberalism. It is secretly introduced into society at all levels by people who latch their hooks to it. It touches on all of life's entities, and can be concisely defined as an ungodly lifestyle. A Humanist may start off good, but by the very link to its fine-sounding doctrines, the person becomes Satanic, given to all manner of sinfulness, helplessly. Only the Jesus which they reject can get one out of that trap, and only with tears of regret.

Pierre Trudeau's wife, Margaret Sinclair, left him in shame to go party with rolling stones. Trudeau's son was killed in an avalanche. Trudeau died a miserable death shortly afterward (cancer), and he's going to answer to God for stacking the Canadian Supreme Court with the liberal and/or secular judges that changed Canada irreparably. Morgentaler, now 86, is about to meet his maker and explain why he gloated when winning his legal right (from Trudeau-appointed Supreme-Court judges) to make a living on the destruction of unborn children. Woe unto Morgentaler; it would have been better had he been aborted by his mother.

I had read many years ago that Trudeau was president of the Canadian Humanist Association, but all I find online now is that he was "a member of the Board of the Montreal Humanist Chapter." Canada seems hopelessly lost to humanist ideals, but to the contrary, one doesn't generally read of American presidents caught up in the American Humanist. American presidents are not portrayed so much as atheists as they are wearers of a Christian mask. In Canada, it is completely out of fashion for politicians to wear any mark of God, let alone a mask.
http://www.standforgod.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=76&Itemid=220

This is all for today.



NEXT IRAQ UPDATE




Updates Index