In their own words, modern Rosicrucians seek a "Rosicrucian Utopia" through a "world government composed of leaders of all nations."
(http://www.rosicrucian.org/downloads/manifesto.pdf)

Because it brings the United Nations to mind, couldn't that quote be an open admission that the UN was founded by Rosicrucians? Or are the AMORC Rosicrucians merely passing themselves off as the founders of the United Nations, or something similar to it? Note that the modern leader of AMORC is not called a "priest/master/minister," but an "Imperator," as in one who rules an empire. Therefore, if AMORC, consisting of a membership merely in the thousands, is an organization of non-influential crackpots, then their boasting of being led by an Imperator is a sign that even its leaders are crackpots. On the other hand, it's possible that its small membership is very influential, including some of the top Illuminatists.

Modern science and technology has come to us mainly from Rosicrucians. But according to an AMORC quote, it is necessary that "scientists are spiritualistic and seek their inspiration from the Book of Nature." It's not hard to see that Evolution is the implication of that statement, and it becomes obvious with further glances into their teachings that Rosicrucians are in the business of making apostates out of Christians. Their Nature Force is sometimes described as the "Christ-force" to attract Christians.

The Rosicrucian coat of arms (at the above website) displays a cross like one depicting the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, and yet an upright pyramid is also displayed on one side of the cross, and an inverted pyramid on the other side, with the Satanic hexagram (also called the "Star of David") above the cross. "Ancient Mystical Order" is written for all to see, indicating that esoteric nonsense of the past is yet being passed off. On the cross there is a rose (instead of Jesus), depicting the secrets of the brotherhood. Thus, they are quite the wolves in sheep's clothing.

Some Templar knights who had betrayed the Vatican were early Rosicrucians. The Templar society, "Order of the Red Cross," has been identified with the Rosicrucians; there was also the designation, "Knights of the Rosy Cross." In the early 1600s, certain Rosicrucians publicized three manifestos. The first manifesto called for universal "Reformation" as code for demolishing the Vatican. The idea was to play on the Luther Reformation of earlier years in an effort to extend it beyond Germany.

Indeed, may we ask if Luther was supported by Rosicrucians? Could that explain how he succeeded against the Vatican to the extent that he did? That's not a very agreeable thought for those Protestants who prize his Faith-Only salvationism, but it would appear to be the truth if we go by the evidence, including Luther's family crest being a cross on a rose! And both Johan and Jakob Andreae, whose family crest was the Scottish Cross surrounded by four roses, were Lutheran theologians; Johan had claimed to write at least one of the Rosicrucian manifestos, and Jakob was the champion of the Lutheran cause after Luther died. Plus, it's no secret that the Reformation in Britain was a Rosicrucian project.

The second manifesto called for the regeneration of society through Rosicrucian philosophies, leading to the anti-Vatican, scientific era called "Age of Enlightenment." The ancient Hermetic "sciences" of astrology, alchemy, and magic had been integral to Rosicrucianism, which is important when we discover that Brook Westcott had founded and run the "Hermes Club" first of all, for three years starting in 1845, prior to involvement with political elitists in the more-intense forms of similar activity. By connecting Westcott (who became an Anglican bishop) and his political friends to the Rosicrucians, we can see that their League-of-Nations movement was an attempt to set up the Rosicrucian "world government composed of leaders of all nations."

Long before Westcott, the Rosicrucians in Britain were led by, and flourishing under, the writer, Francis Bacon (1561-1626). Bacon wrote the book, "New Atlantis," a Rosicrucian fantasy with Scientific Utopia at the core. Does this help us to see that Edgar Cayce was also a Rosicrucian? Recall from a previous chapter that Cayce came prophesying regarding an ancient Atlantis, and that with mankind's discovery of hidden Atlantean records/books, a new Kingdom would be set up on Earth, on/near the year 2000, with a human representative of Jesus as the ruler.

John Dee (1527-1608), the astrologer, was an early scientist and represented the pattern of scientists to follow. It's not hard to see that, aside from Nature Worship becoming the science of Evolution, astrology became the science of astronomy, while alchemy became the science of chemistry. Nor is it hard to understand that both astronomy and chemistry were applied together to advance the evolutionary view of the universe...which is today the science of astro-physics. And so in winning one argument against the Vatican -- proving one truth that the earth does revolve around the sun -- they then made utter fools of themselves by teaching as fact that living things evolved like magic from various materials. To this day, knowing that it's not enough to state that living matter arose from chemical reactions, they state as fact that all living creatures, and their amazing abilities, evolved through mutations!!!

Dee was a European magi, practicing "white magic" and claiming to communicate with angelic beings through his dreams and crystal-gazing. This, then, is the sort of deluded bloke who partook in the introduction of Rosicrucianism into England's royals spheres, claiming, prior to Bacon's claims, that America was the New Atlantis. Bacon not only promoted the Atlantis of John Dee, therefore, but supported Dee's British-Israelism? Dee had convinced the Royal family that the British were the true Jews; the Royals accepted the idea seeing that they had recently, since Henry VIII, declared themselves supreme rulers of both Church and State...usurping the Vatican all the while.

The question is, why was it that, two and three centuries later, some early charismatic fathers were also found promoting British-Israelism? Could we suspect that the Rosicrucians had by then become such experts at feigning Christianity that they corrupted even the Bible-based fundamentalists...those who joined and supported the charismatic movements? It is important to know that men such as Dee were long-ago capable of amazing sermons and prayers that would fool the best of pastors. Take this Dee prayer for example. From that prayer, learn that Rosicrucians are diabolical deceivers.

And you may have heard that Isaac Newton was a Christian, which is precisely how his fellow Rosicrucians wish to promote him. Lord Northampton, a modern devotee of the Jerusalem-Temple rebuilding project, and head of the Scottish rite, said in an interview: "If you look at [Isaac] Newton's work in the Royal Society, he spent many, many hours and days reconstructing precise models of the temple...because he was convinced that the actual harmonies of the universe were locked in that Temple as the microcosm of the macrocosm...which is exactly what Zorzi had argued."
(http://www.econcrisis.homestead.com/BMIsraelMagicTemple.html)

Francesco Zorzi, according to Northampton, was the man who brought Hermetic and Kabalistic teachings, and therefore official Rosicrucianism, into England (from Venice). Indeed, he was a sorcerer like John Dee after him, and it was Zorzi who started the visible Rosicrucian movement in England's power structures before Dee solidified it. Zorzi had private access to Henry VIII and was instrumental in the schism that became the Anglican Reformation.

Elizabeth I ruled after Henry VIII, and in her courts the Rosicrucian spy agency became an infestation. Dee, while working for Elizabeth, was in very fact a spy, and of course it's hard to tell where loyalties lie where spies are concerned:

During World War II, Heinrich Himmler, Nazi thug, albeit brilliant and avid student of the occult had all the huge mechanism of the Abwher at his command. Evidently SS scholars uncovered information about the Elizabethan Secret Service not revealed previously. Himmler stated categorically that the Rosicrucians were a branch of the Elizabethan Secret Service."

"Resurrecting Marley" Mather Walker:
(http://www.sirbacon.org/mmarley.htm)

The Rosicrucians had consistently used education to wage their war on the Vatican: poetry, art, and theater. The rose on a cross was found in the "Paradiso," written by the famous poet, Dante (1265-1321). Notice that Dante's Purgatory was a process unto salvation which equates with the spiritual alchemy of Rosicrucianism. Dante's works were filled with strange ideas because the Rosicrucians were versed in mysteries unknown by others. Moreover, they worked very underground for fear of Vatican persecution so that they required written works to be in secret code.

Poetry, because of the liberality that it affords into abstract ideas, proved to be an excellent means by which Rosicrucians could communicate and teach in secret code. But no less important for public mind-control and the re-writing of history was the theater (notice how great Hollywood's power of influence is today). Johan Andreae of Germany, the one who admitted to writing at least one Rosicrucian manifesto, was a man of the theater. Ditto for the prolific writer, Francis Bacon. And many theorists tie Bacon into the Shakespearian plays closer than you might at first be prepared to believe, suggesting that Bacon wrote the plays.

Rosicrucians owned/controlled colleges and libraries for the sheer purpose of indoctrinating the world into their program. John Dee had a library filled with thousands of "important" works. Invisible Rosicrucians of the early 17th century had their so-called "invisible college" until such time that they could come out of the closet as the Royal Society. It's not surprising that the Cayce prophecy involved a "Hall of Records" i.e. a library.

As an example of what appears to me to be Rosicrucian tampering with the Word of God, the 46th word in the 46th Psalm of the King James Bible is "shake," while the 46th word backwards in the same 46th Psalm is "spear," a clear reference to "Shakespeare," suggesting that Bacon or/as Shakespeare translated at least one of the Psalms. Some have suggested that the editor of the King James Version was Bacon himself, but this is possibly discredited in that James detested the Baconian Rosicrucians, and had even published his own book attacking the Baconians (he was supported by Scottish Rosicrucians). It may be due to this conflict that Westcott and Hort would later set out to usurp the King James Version with their "Revised Version" (1881). James was of the Stewart bloodline and therefore, if we believe the claims of "Bloodline of the Holy Grail," of the dragon line. It would not surprise me to find that the first ones to recently promote the KJV as the only true version of the Word of God were pro-Stewart Rosicrucians.

Francis Bacon worked his way up the political ladder to Solicitor-General, then Attorney-General, and on to Lord Chancellor of England. Afterward, he in essence (i.e. although he died in 1626) co-founded the Royal Society of London (officially established in 1662). The Royal Society had been the "invisible college" under Bacon, and previous to that it had been the "Rosicrucian Society." It is quite revealing that just two years prior to being called the "Royal Society," it was officially the "Invisible College" (1660). At early meetings, discussions would include the "New Philosophy" that supported the Enlightenment. Ironically, the Royal Society was stamped with the approval of King Charles II, a Stewart after James I.

Adam Weishaupt had met with the Rosicrucians of Germany, and, like them, he studied magic, astrology, Egyptian mysteries, Freemasonry and Kabala. His supporters, including fellow German Jew, Mayer Rothschild, infiltrated and "illuminized" many Freemason lodges...for the purpose of Vatican destruction and ultimately world conquest. When the leaders of Bavaria discovered the world-conquest goals of Weishaupt, they shut Weishaupt's lodges down and put him to flight. Some disturbing information was discovered concerning the secret goals:

1) Abolition of the Monarchy and all ordered government.
2) Abolition of private property.
3) Abolition of inheritance.
4) Abolition of patriotism.
5) Abolition of the family, through the abolition of marriage, all morality, and the institution of communal education for children.
6) Abolition of all religion.

There you see the Illuminati's anti-Christian socialism that Carl Marx, yet another German Jew, refined and repackaged in the coming years. These principles produced the French Revolution, the Fabian societies, Russian Communism, the League of Nations, and possibly the current movement toward Globalism.

ROSICRUCIAN UTOPIA IS THE "AMERICAN DREAM"

The Baconian Rosicrucians connected themselves with the Puritans to abolish anything Catholic in England, explaining their common opposition to Mary queen of Scots and then her son, James I. During her third attempt to murder Elizabeth, Mary's private instructions to her accomplice (Anthony Babington) were intercepted by Elizabeth's secret service, namely by Sir Francis Walsingham, and with this evidence Mary was placed under arrest.

I assume that Walsingham had come to represent the leadership of Elizabeth's Rosicrucian spy network because his position had been passed to him by the queen's pet, the very anti-Catholic, William Cecil, who just happened to be Bacon's uncle. William Davison is suspect as a Rosicrucian as well, for, as Secretary of queen Elizabeth at the time, he was associated very closely to Walsingham. Davison was the one who played a key role in urging a reluctant Elizabeth to sign Mary's execution papers (late 1586), but it is thought that Davison was urged by William Cecil. After Elizabeth had signed under pressure, she yet instructed Davison not to execute Mary, her cousin. Davison wouldn't/couldn't comply with this wish, and he with his people violated Mary's head.

An indignant Elizabeth banished Davison and Cecil from her Court, to prison, but made Bacon's cousin (William Cecil's son) the new Secretary. This Robert Cecil went on to replace his father as Treasurer, and was the queen's number one man...not to mention that he continued as the personal secretary of the subsequent ruler, James I. Some historians suspect Cecil within the inner workings of the Gunpowder Plot (which was to blame Catholics for the murder, or attempted murder, of James I).

From the bloodline of William and Robert Cecil came Cecil Rhodes of Rhodes Scholarship fame. In the 19th century, Rhodes was the partner in crime with the British House of Rothschild in their common goal of, in Rhodes' own words, "a scheme to take the government of the whole world." Because it was the Rosicrucian purpose to make America the extension of British Rosicrucians, Cecil Rhodes wrote in his will:

"Why should we not form a secret society with but one object the furtherance of the British Empire and the bringing of the whole uncivilized world under British rule for the recovery of the United States for the making the Anglo-Saxon race but one Empire?"

(http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers/rhodes-will.html)

Rhodes was a white supremacist who moreover wanted to take all of Africa for England, wherefore just think of how utterly deceived the black people of America are/were when they support(ed) Clinton, the first Rhodes Scholar to make it to the U.S. Presidency.

The year previous to Mary's execution, a William Brewster had accompanied Davison on a diplomatic mission to Leyden, Holland, where Puritan (anti-Anglican) forces had been gathering for years, but also Rosicrucians. Brewster's adoptive son, the William Bradford of Plymouth-Rock fame, wrote that Davison "only employed [Brewster] in all matters of greatest trust and secrecy." Why? What were they up to?

Prior to his Court appointment with Elizabeth, Davison had been an elder of an English Puritan church, this body located in Belgium because Puritan Separatists had been outlawed in England. Davison trained Brewster so that Brewster founded his own illegal Separatist church (1602) -- in England -- where he became its underground elder. Thus, in all the time that Davison worked for the queen, he was in this sense her enemy.

The Puritans had not been too happy about Elizabeth acting as the representative of Christ on earth. Davison, in Leyden on a diplomatic mission for the queen, secured instead the Netherlands for the Puritan cause, to the dismay of his boss. Brewster then remained in Leiden for months and learned much about freedom-of-religion, freedom-of-thought and freedom-of-the-press...i.e. the very principles that would soon become the United States of America.

Leiden was where Brewster would eventually settle with his own bands of Puritans from the Scrooby congregation. But as they chose to flee to Leiden, amid powerful Rosicrucians, it could seem that both he and Davison were Rosicrucians. If outwardly their causes appeared Puritan and not Rosicrucian, it's perhaps due to the invisibility that Rosicrucians abide by, as a rule working under the cover of other movements that end up taking the blame for their troublesome activities.

Brewster's father, of Scrooby Mansion, had been appointed Postmaster by Elizabeth. For those who endeavor to be spies, this was a very key position in that important documents passed through. Perhaps royal Rosicrucian spies had control of the position through Brewster's father...but also through Davison. You see, when the father died (1590), the Postmaster position was passed on to someone other than the son, but Davison (fresh out of prison thanks to allies in Parliament) did some persuading with the right people and got Brewster the job...which Brewster held until he was caught running his illegal church (1607).

As Rosicrucians were huge for printing and spreading propaganda, Leiden was rife with press material. Davison had been intimate with the Dutch publishing industry so that we are not surprised to learn that Brewster acquired his own press when he settled in Leiden (1609). Brewster then published banned, anti-Crown material (James I was king at this point). By the way, the King James Version of the Bible was published in that very period (1611), but what's relevant here is that Brewster published his anti-Stewart (i.e. anti-Catholic) propaganda in the same general period (1617-1619) that the three Rosicrucian manifestos were first distributed (1614-1616) to topple the Vatican. Could the two sets of writings have come from the same source?

The first two Rosicrucian manifestos are said to have been published in Cassel (Germany)...generally the future location of the Rothschild/Bavarian Illuminati. The following clip enlightens us concerning the massing of Rosicrucians into Holland in this period, while mentioning Frankfurt as another of their bases; Frankfurt was the home of the Bauer family that would see its name changed to "Rothschild" by one son of the family, Mayer:

"Peter Mormius, a notorious alchymist, and contemporary of Bohmen, endeavoured, in 1630, to introduce the Rosicrucian philosophy into Holland. He applied to the States-General to grant him a public audience, that he might explain the tenets of the sect...The States-General wisely resolved to have nothing to do with him. He thereupon determined to shame them by printing his book, which he did at Leyden the same year. It was entitled "The Book of the most Hidden Secrets of Nature," and was divided into three parts; the first treating of "perpetual motion" [the Rosicrucian, Isaac Newton, would soon champion that idea], the second of the "transmutation of metals" [Newton delved into that too], and the third of the "universal medicine." He also published some German works upon the Rosicrucian philosophy, at Frankfort, in 1617"

(http://www.worldwideschool.org/library/books/relg/socialeccltheology/MemoirsofPopularDelusionsV3/chap34.html).

Due to this rejection, leading Rosicrucians may have joined themselves to unsuspecting Puritan groups, and we could expect some Utopian ideals to bud forth from the Puritans if this had been the case. We do find such things in the Puritans, but also in the Quakers who would come to set up a Utopian project in Pennsylvania and Delaware known as the "Holy Experiment."

In their effort to form their own State Church in England, the Puritan Separatists failed when failing to topple the Anglican Church. And so, in 1620, several of the Leiden congregation were found on the Mayflower, and Brewster himself sailed on the ship, and acted as Elder both upon it and in the Plymouth Colony...while his own trainee and adoptive son, William Bradford, was elected Colony governor 30 times. To this picture add the fact that the Rosicrucian astrologer, John Dee, just prior to the colonizing of Jamestown and Plymouth, had been refining his navigation skills...for getting some ships to the New Atlantis! Was the Brewster gang an early fulfillment of Dee's dreams?

Brewster participated in his American voyage only because he secured financial assistance from a family friend in very high places, merely the Treasurer of the Virginia Company. The Virginia Company was a for-profit business and represented all that America was at the time. In fact, the Company funded the Mayflower venture itself. Surely, Rosicrucians true to the New-Atlantis dream would have snapped up memberships in the Virginia Company.

It's perhaps interesting that the sailors had signed a pact to honor James I as their king, yet their ship reportedly went off course from where they had permission to land, so that they instead ended up in Massachusetts...where the Sinclairs of Scotland had been, with Templars, two to three centuries earlier (a century before Columbus). We will meet the Scottish Sinclairs shortly. Britannica says this:

"No colony in the history of European colonization ranked above Massachusetts Bay in wealth, station, education, or capacity....their purpose was to accomplish in the new world that which they had been prevented from accomplishing at home. Their intention was to create in the American wilderness a new Zion..." (1970 Volume 18, pg. 881)

The article goes on to say that, after a string of failures due to opposing doctrinal viewpoints, they succumbed inevitably to a Democracy with toleration/freedom of differing religions, what Christ will not condone in His Kingdom, but reflecting the viewpoints back in Holland.

Back in England, Oliver Cromwell had turned the wheels of civil war to the end that Parliament had beheaded the son of James I, King Charles I (1649). Cromwell was a Freemason, yet he was supported by Puritans; one of Brewster's men in Plymouth, Edward Winslow, sailed home to fight with Cromwell; Winslow had been Brewster's partner in the Leiden printing-press operations. But as Cromwell was a great supporter of Rosicrucians, could all this and more imply that Winslow, and therefore Brewster, and therefore others on the Mayflower, and therefore Virginia-Company leaders, were Rosicrucians? The result of Cromwell's victories resulted in the following scenario:

Among these radical groups, the practice of magic was common. In fact, during the decade [1649-59] that followed the defeat of the Crown [by Cromwell], there was an outpouring of works on astrology, Paracelsianism, and other mystical chemical or alchemical works, as well as the first English translations of Rosicrucian texts. Oxford and Cambridge universities came under pressure to teach courses on astrology and alchemy during this period."

David Kubrin

Dead on Arrival: The Fate of Nature in the Scientific Revolution
(http://www.culturechange.org/issue20/deadonarrival.htm).

To no surprise there were among the Cromwell Puritans some influential Rosicrucians who funded his revolution. And among the Rosicrucians there were powerful Kabalistic Jews from the Netherlands who convinced Cromwell that without the spread of Jews worldwide, the Biblical Millennium could not arrive. Cromwell did the bidding of these Dutch Jews (many of which were feigning Christianity) by allowing them to fill England. Nathan Rothschild, head of the House of Rothschild in his generation, would later connect with these Jews (1799). Together they would usurp England en route to infecting the world with their financial machinations.

Note the similarities between the mystical Rosicrucians of the wild Cromwell days and modern ultra-charismatics:

The Restoration bishop, Samuel Parker, claimed that Rosicrucianism led its followers to 'the wildest and most Enthusiastical Fanaticisme.' Anthony á Wood, the chronicler of Oxford University's history, charged that those who professed to having visions, revelations, and the like, were really 'aiming at an utter subversion of the Universities, churches, and schools'...The sheer volume of such attacks readily supports P.M. Rattansi's observation that 'the natural magic tradition attained unprecedented influence and attention... during the Puritan Revolution,' as well as demonstrating that a focused reaction against that widespread magical radicalism had very much become a priority in influential circles"

(Dead on Arrival...see URL above).

Speaking of visions, revelations, and mystical trances, it brings to mind the Quakers, a zealous lot of anti-Catholic, leftist Separatists who arrived to Plymouth (1656) in dribs and drabs a few decades after the Mayflower. They used the term, "Society of Friends," to identify themselves, the very phrase used later by a group of Illuminatists (the Jacobin Club) responsible for the Red Terror of the French Revolution. Moreover, a Martinist-Rosicrucian cult purportedly founded by Louis-Claude de Saint-Martin was also named "Society of Friends." This cult evolved into AMORC in the United States.

The Quakers became the first American charismatics, if the statement of John F. MacArthur can be trusted, who said:

"Another group that practiced a form of tongues was the Shakers, an American sect with Quaker roots that flourished in the mid-1700s. Mother Ann Lee, founder of the sect, regarded herself as the female equivalent of Jesus Christ. She claimed to be able to speak in seventy-two languages. The Shakers believed sexual intercourse was sinful, even within marriage. They spoke in tongues while dancing and singing in a trance-like state.

(http://www.bible.ca/tongues-women-usurp.htm)

William Penn, a Quaker champion and friend of the Quaker founder (George Fox), was quite fond of the Christian faith in Holland, and perhaps he made contact there with Rosicrucians dressed as Puritans. That would explain his leaning away from acknowledging the deity of Jesus Christ.

The Quakers considered themselves privy to discovering -- through mystic meditation -- extra-Biblical knowledge supposedly from God, called, "Inner Light." But the Rosicrucians, too, had claimed to find -- through mystic meditation -- extra-Biblical knowledge supposedly from God that they called "Illumination." Inner light evokes eastern, occult meditation more than it does meditation on the Word of God. John Punshon in his "A Short History of the Quakers" shares the following:

"The Quakers are an interesting if not a puzzling phenomenon. They worship in silence but publish a continuous stream of books and pamphlets largely about themselves. They are few in number yet you find them everywhere, often in places of considerable influence. They are fearless social reformers and have a very good head for business...They proclaim a great message, yet do it in curiously muted tones."

This portrayal of Quakers describes Rosicrucians very well, who were zealous social reformers as, for example, can be deduced from their three manifestos. And the Rosicrucians, too, were few and yet held powerful positions. William Penn received as sole proprietor a huge grant of land from England that came to be Pennsylvania and the Holy Experiment itself. How does one Quaker come to receive such a huge tract of land from England while Quakers are imprisoned there (including Penn himself), and while the Crown knew that certain Americans such as the Quakers wanted independence from England, unless there were some very powerful people behind the grant who supported the Utopian project and its Quaker leadership?

Pennsylvania and Delaware were at first in the hands of the Swedes, Finns and Dutch prior to the House of York taking over on England's behalf in 1664. It turns out that the Pennsylvania grant was sanctioned officially by the duke of York before being handed over to Penn by Charles II in 1681 (New York, previously New Amsterdam, was named after this duke of York). And Charles was the same king that had given the nod for the formation of the Royal Society two decades earlier. Penn was not only on friendly terms with Charles, but also with the succeeding James II (the Duke of York above), even though the Quakers were, on very principle, enemies of the Royals! Penn became extremely powerful under the reign of James II, to the point of liberating Quakers from prison and then shipping many of them to the Holy Experiment. One could get the impression that these Stewart kings were Rosicrucian-friendly, if not Rosicrucian-controlled, .

Penn was prolific in political writings, including, An Essay Towards the Present and Future Peace of Europe "in which he proposed an international organization to prevent wars by arbitrating disputes" (Britannica: 1970; Vol. 17). Doesn't that sound just like the modern UN Security Council? But that Essay was way back in 1693!!

Penn then invited some Amish-like Dutch and German Rosicrucians under John Zimmerman to join the Experiment, and these with Johannes Kelpius arrived to the Philadelphia area the very next year, in 1694. While these people are considered by historians to be the first-known injection of European Rosicrucians into America, the fact must be that political Rosicrucians, to be distinguished from the religious sort (or those who openly practice an occult religion), had been in America from the very start.

This Pennsylvania religious group was called the "Chapter of Perfection," a branch of the London-based "Masonic Rite of Perfection." The members claimed that Jesus would come to restore the Millennium in their life times, and yet they were astrologers, and lovers of magic and esoteric mysteries. Zimmerman was formerly of the Philadelphians, a quasi-Quaker, Templar-like cult from Europe...and it just can't be a coincidence that the city had the same name as this cult.

Two years later, Penn "drafted the first plan for a union of the American colonies" (Britannica). Penn championed freedom of religion for this Union, the Freemasonic holy cow now permitting Satanic cults to become registered charitable organizations. By 1858, Rosicrucians had headquartered themselves in Quakertown, Pennsylvania.

Britannica tells us: "In 1734 Benjamin Franklin, then 28 years of age, was elected grand master of Masons in Pennsylvania, and in the same year he published the first Masonic book printed in America." Perhaps the city of Philadelphia was not meant to mean, "City of Brotherly Love" so much as the "City of the Freemasonic Brotherhood." Franklin spent years in Britain prior to returning to the Colonies. Only he knows all of what he was doing there, or to whom he was talking, as concerns American Independence. But I was surprised to find, in a candid list of Rosicrucians, that Franklin was included (as was Isaac Newton).
(http://www.wordiq.com/definition/List_of_Rosicrucians).

Perhaps it was a coincidence, but in 1776, the same year that the Bavarian Illuminati was formed in Europe, the Phi Beta Kappa secret society was formed in the College of William and Mary, Virginia, afterwhich it spread to various colleges with the purpose of recruiting gifted men for effecting politics as desired by the secret society. The members of Phi Beta Kappa would assist one another in becoming wealthy, prestigious, and in climbing political and judicial ladders. A second chapter was started at Yale just four years later, and it is thought that the Skull and Bones club grew out of that chapter when, a generation later, secret societies were pressured to close down by anti-Masonic political forces.

It is important to know that Thomas Jefferson supported Adam Weishaupt, founder of the Bavarian Illuminati, and that Jefferson was behind the Phi Beta Kappa movement. Jefferson was taught at the William and Mary college by his mentor, William Small, who was heavy into mathematics, philosophy, and science, the three Rosicrucian specialties of the time. Jefferson himself wrote that Small "fixed the destinies of my life," which could mean that Jefferson was initiated, for life, into the Illuminati. For that professor of Philosophy introduced Jefferson to the writings of Francis Bacon and Isaac Newton, two leading Rosicrucians (http://www.wm.edu/about/jefferson/jefferson_college.php).

The year after Small's death, college students formed Phi Beta Kappa. While many websites hint at Jefferson's leading role in the secret society, a website belonging to Harpur College comes right out with it by writing: "Phi Beta Kappa, which was established by Thomas Jefferson..." (http://www.harpercollege.edu/learning/ptk.shtml).

Attesting to the powers of secret societies in elevating their devotees, Jefferson became the leader of the William and Mary college, then acquainted with the circle of friends around the Virginia Governor so that he himself became the Virginia Governor...before becoming President of the United States. In this way, Jefferson's Declaration of Independence was, not a Christian-based document, but a two-faced Illuminati scheme. In a country filled with Christians, it was important for the secret societies to portray their chosen luminaries as Christian, and so why not their official documents?

One interesting theory, due to the similarities between the Declaration of Independence and the writings of William Duncan, is that the Declaration has origins in Scotland. For Duncan was from Aberdeen, Scotland. William Small was also in Aberdeen...when Duncan was his professor of natural philosophy!! (http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~smalljd/ri/ptj.htm)

The significance of the William and Mary college may have been that one Mary, married to William II of Orange, was the daughter of Charles I and therefore a Stewart. William and Mary's son, William III, married another Mary, daughter of another Stewart, James II. Charles and James were those who supported the Holy Experiment, remember, and Rosicrucians had been meeting in Mason's Hall (London) to conceal their secret political efforts to restore the exiled house of Stuart [or "Stewart"]."
(http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/anti-masonry/anti-masonry03.html#2.05)

However, the supporters of William III ousted James II from power and replaced him (1989) because James insisted, against family pressure, on staying his pro-Catholic course. William on the other hand was anti-Catholic...and allegedly a homosexual Freemason.

Orange was in Holland. You can easily find internet websites asserting that wealthy Jewish bankers of Holland worked with (i.e. used) William III to set up the Bank of England as a means to rule England invisibly en route to ruling the world...invisibly.

If you have ever passed by lodges that call themselves by the name, "Orange," now you know why: "William II is reported to have been a Freemason. In fact, in 1688, a militant secret society was formed to support William II. It was called the Order of Orange after William II's family, and it patterned itself after Freemasonry"
(http://www.mystae.com/restricted/streams/masons/conspire.html).