In the last update, I explained why the kinetic theory of atoms is impossible, thanks to the fact that the atmosphere weighs downward onto the ground. In the kinetic theory, there is nothing between air atoms to transfer the weight of air atoms to the ground. All atoms are defying gravity as they supposedly race about in space.

I then explained that there is in fact a sea of inter-repelling electrons in the atmosphere, and therefore the air atoms, which are not racing around as the idiotic kineticists think they are, can now transfer their weights to the ground through the inter-repulsion by which all electrons are in "contact."

It's important to understand that air atoms are given LIFT by the electrons in their midst, and anything given lift will transfer its weight downward. The weight of a ball in your hand gets transferred to the bottom of your feet.

Watch this video before I comment on it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUq_tM3yGTM

No surprise, none of the weight of a hung, metal ball immersed in water gets transferred to the bottom of the water-filled container. Nearing the two-minute mark, the ball is shown entering the water, at which time the water level goes up by about 1/8". As water pressure goes up 455 grams per 27.7 inches of water depth, it works out to about 2 grams per 1/8" of depth. As the liquid surface looks to be about 4 inches square, or 16 square inches, the submersion of the ball tallies to 2 x 16 = about 32 grams of higher water. The video producer measured 35 grams of water inside the ping-pong ball, and so I'm close enough with the guess that the water level went up by 1/8th inch.

The point is, it seems that an added depth of 1/8-inch gives the water body 32 grams of added water pressure in all directions. Pressure from the sides of the ball to the sides of the water bowl have zero effect on the weight scale, but 35 grams of pressure working off the bottom of the ball apparently gives the weight scale an additional 35 grams of "weight," not real weight, but water pressure translating to what the scale picks up as weight. We can call it fabricated weight.

The only way I can explain what we see in the experiment is that the added water pressure between the bottom of the metal ball and the bowl's floor presses down on the scale too, to turn the 228 grams of bowl and water weight to 263 grams i.e. with 35 grams of fabricated weight added.

The same happens when he holds the same-sized ping-pong ball fully in the water with his fingers (above the water surface): that submerged ball likewise increases the scale's number by about 35 grams. But not so the submerged ping-pong ball tied with a string to the bottom of the bowl. It raises the scale's 228 to only 233, an increase of just 5 grams. I think I can explain this.

But first, let's hammer home the reason for the added 35 grams. The water pushing the ball upward by an additional 35 grams is identical to you lifting 35 grams higher, pushing on it from underneath. The 35 grams will transfer to your feet, and then to the floor. That's what's going on in the bowl.

What I don't understand is why the immersing of the metal ball (1:55 point) does not cause the weight scale to increase for the entire submersion process. Only when the ball is no longer moving downward does the weight scale go up.

When the plastic ball is tied with a string to the bottom of the container, the water registers only an additional 5 grams. My explanation for this is that the 35 grams of upward force is lifting the bowl, reducing it by 35 minus 5 grams. At first, we think that this cannot be true, but there's no other way to explain it.

The 228-gram weight of the water-filled container is accounted for to begin with, but when the water lifts the ping pong ball with a force of 35 grams, it reduces the weight of the container by 30 grams, not 35, because the ball itself is exerting a 5-gram downward force due to the 5-gram weight of its plastic.

On the other hand, when the metal ball is shown submerged while hung by a wire tied to something above the water surface, that ball transfers zero weight upon the water molecules. For obvious reason. The wire prevents the ball from weighing down on molecules.

On the other hand, when the ball is tied from it's underside to the bottom of the container by a flexible string, there's nothing to keep gravity from pulling it down to the degree that gravity is capable.

True, in the tug-of-war, buoyancy on the ping-pong ball overcomes the downward pull from gravity, but that downward pull reduces the upward force by as much as the plastic weighs. The more the ball's outer skin weighs, the less the upward buoyant force. Therefore, what I'm learning is that the extra weight on the scale is: the upward buoyant force minus the downward weight force.

If a ping pong ball were permitted to rise freely in water, it's yet resting on water molecules because they push it up, and consequently the ball's weight transfers to the bottom of the container (or lake). Even while the ball rises due to water rushing in underneath it, gravity is pulling it nonetheless, and having some buoyancy-negating effect.

The same applies to air atoms. So long as they're pushed upward by rising free electrons that bump atoms on their undersides, the weights of all atoms transfer to the ground. I win, the liars lose. They lie to you. Atoms cannot be racing around eternally, and the baboons know better than to promote that stupidity.

In the air, all air atoms are literally weighing downward through the electron sea into which air atoms are immersed. Even though the electrons are not in contact with each other, the weights of all atoms transfer through the repulsion forces emitting from every electron. The latter are in physical contact only with the atoms. Electrons spread out and thus invade atoms.

Therefore, the electrons do indeed form a "water" body, but, the difference is, they do not produce buoyancy on lone gas atoms in the way that liquid molecules do to full-blown objects. Buoyancy applies only to objects because they are huge as compared to lone atoms.

There needs to be a significant amount of greater water pressure under an object, as compared to its top side, in order to get it to express some upward buoyancy. The less distance between the top and bottom of an object, the lower the upward buoyant force. With a lone atom, that difference, from top to bottom of the atom, is essentially zero. Lone atoms receive no buoyant force, contrary to what the liars, the kineticists, teach you. It means that, with kineticism, hotter air cannot rise in colder air because there is no lift factor if all that atoms do is bang each other around. They will go downward as much as upward or straight across.

Yet, the fact is that hotter air does rise in colder air, and so there needs to be something to give the hotter air atoms more lift than colder air atoms. The atoms immersed in a denser free-electron sea will rise with more force.

When lone gas atoms are given lift by the free-electron sea that exists everywhere, the upward force on the undersides of the atoms is explained. It's not buoyancy proper, and there's more lift than what's due to the electrons spreading atoms apart. I'm reporting to you a basic law that nobody does: free electrons are repelled upward by earth gravity. It's the ever-constant rise of heat into outer space. There is no other explanation for the fact that gas atoms remain at a distance from one another, unless the gas is filled with free electrons that push gas atoms apart. The baboons, the morons, invented a fallacious explanation in the kinetic theory of atoms, and they knew the theory had fatal faults but pushed it anyway.

Some of the morons are trying to make you believe that light created matter, what a bunch of morons. And the theories of the moronic evolutionists never end, one monster giving birth to another. Light is a wave through the electron aether, the very free electrons existing everywhere that I'm talking about. You cannot make atoms from a wave of motion energy moving electron-to-electron. MORONS need to be put away in insane asylums. Evolutionist morons will be put away by Judge Jesus into hellish darkness that will make them go insane. Why pity these morons who want your God dead forever?

Think of how stupid Einstein was when he discovered electrons emitting from atoms. Duh, stupid: the emission of electrons into the electron aether is light. MORON. He is lifted up as a genius, yet was a moron who did away with the aether. Just one look at that man should warn you to stay away. What does time have to do with light, MORON? Anyone who thinks in this way is more interested in having fun with science fiction than in discovering the realities. STAY AWAY from Einstein worshipers.

Gravity cannot have a source inside atoms, but rather is a negative charge from a giant storehouse of free electrons in the earth's rocks. I'm not afraid of any modern physicist when I state my theories because, with each passing decade, they become more moronic. Instead of apologizing for the errors of their fathers, they birth monsters more ridiculous than the previous ones. So much fun being an irresponsible lunatic on the fast lane to insanity. The physics videos that make it to the top of youtube's algorithm are such astonishing puke.

All I need to say to any physicist mocker is: prove that gravity cannot be a negative charge? They'll have nothing to say when I inform them that a negative gravity force will logically make all atoms net-positive in charge. Gravity can thus attract all atoms. I don't even need to tell them how a negative gravity force can make all atoms net-positive because they know exactly how any atom becomes net-positive. It's EASY to make an atom net-positive.

But what the morons may not understand, because they never took the time to think about it -- which is why they're morons -- is that their charge-detecting instruments cannot detect atomic charges if they set their charge detectors to zero in the midst of air atoms, free electrons, or the gravitational field. Duh, if you set the thing to zero charge in the midst of charged items, you can't detect the correct, specific charge of anything with your detector.

Best thing: stop being a moron. Free electrons in the earth are so plentiful that they MUST emit a negative charge. It's undeniable. The morons know that, wherever there is heat, there are free electrons. They won't admit it for everything, but if they are honest, they will admit that they really don't know for sure whether heating elements give off electrons. If they are taught that heating elements do not give off electrons, shouldn't they demand solid evidence?

When heating elements give off light, that's free electrons emitting from the elements, same as in a light-bulb filament. There can be no heat source without free electrons coming out of the source. It's that simple, yet the morons are taking things to the next level of moronicism, intent on denying the fact that heat is the "caloric" of free and weightless electrons. They are weightless because gravity repels them.

Adding heat to any material is NOT expected to make them weigh more. Why didn't the moronic fathers of the modern morons entertain the possibility that caloric was a weightless material from a weightless particle? Why did they gamble on becoming morons instead? How long are they going to continue in moronicism? In order for a substance to be weightless, it requires no stretch at all. It needs only that gravity repel it, duh. Repulsion is EVERYWHERE. Why didn't the morons want a gravity force that can repel electrons? Because the God haters rejected it. The planets could not form if gas atoms repel each other. See that?

They start with theoretical gas clouds circling the sun that, once cooled, start to form liquids and solids, and, hence, the planets. Ya-but, whenever I form a gas, it dissipates FAST. It thins out FAST. All gas atoms repel each other even at room temperature. How in tarnation do the morons expect hot gases to orbit the sun for millions of years without going bye-bye from the orbital path? Duh, MORONS, LIARS, GOD HATERS, pushing trash into the minds of your children.

How do the puke evolutionists get away with planet formation via hot gases from the sun, knowing that gases spread out? Easy. They depended on the naivety of the masses. The liars drew pictures of gases in orbit, fed the drawings to the naive, and just allowed them to make their own picture, in their own minds, as to how the clouds cooled into liquid planets. It's easy to imagine. The ignorant people were not told that gases spread out FAST. If the sun were to spew gases, they would not gather more thickly into distinct orbits. But that reality could easily go over the heads of those not familiar with gas behavior. Somebody needs to tell them: gas atoms don't congregate. They won't form proto-stars by congregating at any spot.

Plus, there can be no gravity pool at any one proto-star spot unless there are atoms there to begin with. But gas atoms don't congregate. Besides, big-bang particles (protons and electrons) could never come closer to each other with the passing of aeons, meaning they could never form atoms in the first place. But the God-forsaking morons don't tell you that part. With each passing year, protons and electrons from a big-bang explosion would move untold miles apart just because the volume of space gets larger with increasing distance from the explosion point. It's not as though the morons don't know this; it's that they don't want you to think about it. They don't mind feeding you trash if you can be made to enjoy eating it. And that's what they did.

If ever you want to see my accumulated articles on similar topics, all having new views most have never heard: http://www.tribwatch.com/art3Physics.htm

Marjorie Greene and Thomas Massie

Last November (3rd update of the month), I explored whether an alternative fulfillment of Sleeping Beauty could be Marjory Taylor Greene, with my presence in the dream acting as Thomas Massie because I have a Masci grandmother. I was convinced that this was a correct theory. I'll go over some of those reasons now because Massie has been largely successful in outing the Trump administration on its Epstein cover-up.

At this link for the Sleeping Beauty dream: "I then saw myself, as a spectator would, walking on the beach toward her, with jeans only, no shirt." I have been tracing the variations of Shirts/Shards to SARDinian elements for years, and Sardinia is where Bondi's/Blondi's and Lago's are first known who essentially share the same Chief, a near copy of the Chief of Tous'/Tosini's who in turn have a man wearing a "shirt."

You can click Shirts now, which loads them on another tab in order to load other surnames, to better follow the heraldic links.

I had looked Lago's up because Trump lives at Mar-a-Lago, but then God seems to have arranged a pointer to him because Leggs almost have the Trump Coat. As you probably know, Pam Biondi is Trump's attorney general who's in charge of releasing the Epstein files, but who's been disappointing by covering for the criminals.

Long before Thomas Massie fronted a bill to force Bondi to do the release by an act of law, I had claimed that Sleeping Beauty was on Epstein's island. I explained the reasons for that interpretation. I had claimed that Trump was the bulldog at the start of the dream.

What would be the chances, had God not made arrangements in pointing to Marjorie Taylor Greene, that a Marjory surname could show itself related to the Greene surname? Marjorys show only "daisies," yet the Daisy surname has a GREEN "PALE" bar. Big deal. That's not evidence enough that Daisys were related to Greens.

But wait. Maybe there's hope, for while Daisys are also Dais', English Days' are first known in Somerset with Camels while Pale's have a camel head. Ya-but, that's not nearly as good as God could do in being convincing toward a pointer to Ms. Greene.

Okay, but there's a little more where English Days' share the stars of Bondi's/Blondi's while Blonds and Blondville's are first known in Suffolk with Marjorys. Is that better? Is it striking us as a pointer of God? Not yet?

Irish Days' can convince us, and not only because they are first known in County Clare, named by Strongbow Clare. English Clare's, sharing triple-red chevrons with Epsteins, are first known in Suffolk with Daisys. See that? But there's much more. Strongbow Clare ruled in Wales, where Taylor-branch Tillers are first known. And I'll add that while Taylors are also Tails, Talls share the bee with Daisys ("bee feeding on a daisy").

There's more because Irish Days make it certain that the Daisy/Dais pale bar is green for the sake of honoring the Green surname, first known in Kent with Clare's of Tunbridge Wells, and also with Snake's/Snooks" in the "two green snakes" of Irish Days'. The latter, along with Bondi's/Blondi's, have a white, central, and erect sword which thus acts as a lone pale bar, the Daisy/dais symbol too.

The biggie convincer comes where the Dais sword and green snakes almost forms this Mackesy Coat...which itself adds eagles in the colors of the Snake/Snook eagle. At houseofnames.com, Mackesys are listed with Marjory-like Margesons. Coincidence? Then, lookie at what was said in the last update: "I've pointed the Market/Margeson "Loyalite ME" motto phrase to Lolita's/Loyola's, and therefore to Jeffrey Epstein's plane, the Lolita Express." So, from Marjory-beloved Daisys, we got to Days' who in turn got us to the Mackesy/Margeson motto. I'm therefore convinced that God set up the heraldry in this way. Hope you are too.

But there's more, for the brown "stag" in the Green Crest is exactly the gold "TRIPpant stag" in the Crest of Irish Days', and English Trips are first known in Kent with Daisy-beloved Greens while Daisys are first known in Angus with PANTers possibly is "tripPANT." In heraldry, the positioning of animal heads and legs mean something. The two stags are identically shown in every way.

Mackesys/Margesons (Sussex, beside Kent) even share the Taylor/Tail and Tiller lion, and Taylors/Tails apply them to a lone pale bar, the Daisy symbol too (Taylors/Tails use the Blake pale bar). While Gore's/CORE's (Kent with Trips) share the Trip crosslets, Corks/CORE's show nothing in their Shield but lion "tails" in the colors of the Taylor/Tail lions.

Corks/Core's are also Corrs while Irish Corrys/Currys are first known in Waterford while this Arms of County Waterford has the Trump stag head for a related reason. Sometimes, the same Arms has the stag head facing the viewer, at which time it becomes the Coat of Leggs. The latter are first known in Dumfries with Scottish Corrys. See that? Both Leggs and Trumps share stags on blue with Greens. There is a Waterford surname listed with Waterville's, and then Waters/Waterville's share the Epstein Coat.

The Honors suspect in the Shirt/Shard motto essentially share the Green Coat, except that they call the Green stags, "bucks." That in a nutshell shows that my shirtlessness is a pointer to Greene-versus-Bondi.

In the dream, I was WALKing on the beach toward Beauty, with jeans on only. I've shown by several methods to prove that English Jeans/Jane's (Cornwall with Corks/Core's) use the lion of Bruce's and Corkers, relevant here because Marjory Carrick married Bruce's of Annandale, which location is in Dumfries with the first-known Walks and Leggs. The Walk Coat, sharing the Days stars, looks somewhat related to the Coat of Days-beloved Snake's/Snooks. Carricks/CORRICKs share a motto term with Carews/Carrots, first known in Cornwall with Jeans/Jane's and Corks. I was walking toward a Carew-like car, where, I'm now assuming, Marjorie was waiting for me to arrive. Corcoran-beloved Oaks (from the "oak stump") are first known in Somerset with the Cork-beloved Pointers.

The Corker motto is suspect with the Tume's because they are first known in Worcestershire, where Jeans/Jane's were previously first known. Days are also Dea's while "Dei" is a Corker motto term. The Bello's in the Corcoran motto are first known in Cheshire with Dee's and Massie's, and where Grime's/Grimms were previously first known. As Bellamys are first known in Shropshire with TALbots, the Corcorans could have the Talbot lion. Talbots have the Coat of Greys (Northumberland with Grime's/Grimms), which is almost the Dee Coat, in colors reversed. Grey-connectable Gris' are also Griims.

As I was walking toward Beauty's car, I'm now thinking that I represent Thomas Massie, for my grandmother, Miss Masci, married Mr. Grimaldi while I think the Greme/Greem variations of Greens reveals Grimaldi's. English Grime's/Grimms even have a "green martlet" in Crest. Marjorie Greene was one of only three congressmen who stood with Massie in barely making his bill pass the congressional tide acting against them.

My grandmother birthed Dominic Grimaldi, and then English Dominics are interesting first for sharing the eight-pointed Tous/Tosini star. The latter are suspect with the Tosni variation of Toeni's (Tonys/Tone's) of Leicester, and then Daisys are first known in Suffolk with Towns/Tune's and Clare's while the latter were at TUNbridge Wells (Kent with Greens). English Wells apply two tails to their lion as likely code for Taylors/Tails.

German Wells are excellent because they have a giant pelican "FEEDINg her young in a nest, natural" to go with the Daisy bee "feeding on a daisy." "Natural" is a descriptive term of the Monaco Coat while Grimaldi's rule Monaco. The Tous/Tosini Coat has a "MAN's head and bust natural" while wearing a red shirt, and the "man" in the Crest of German Fedders wears RED too, and then Reds/Reeds (same place as Grime's/Grimms) share a "Pax" motto term with the same Dominics sharing the eight-pointed Tous/Tosini star. Doesn't it appear that I am to be on the Dominics from my grandmother's son?

English Dominics have "counter changed" colors while Change's are first known in Hampshire with the Buttons in the "gold buttons" of Tous'/Tosini's who share the eight-pointed Dominic star. Hampshire (beside Hosts) is where Tiss' are first known expected in the "HosTIS" motto term of Shirts/Shards (share Tiss chevron).

Repeat: "The Honors suspect in the Shirt/Shard motto essentially share the Green Coat. Honors are listed with Honans while Honey-branch Hone's are first known in Hampshire too, and Honeys share the bee with Marjory-beloved Daisys/Dais'. The Shirts/Shards are pointing to Marjorie yet again.

Honeys also show hives while Ives' share the Shirt/Shard roundels. Ives' are suddenly interesting for being first known in Lincolnshire with Tailbois', and with the Wake's who share red roundels with Ives', yet the Wake roundels are in both colors of Ore/Orr roundels while Orrels (Lancashire with Parrs) share the Ives Coat exactly! I was told to WAKE Sleeping Beauty. Time to wake up and expose Trump the dishonest, demonic fraud. If protecting corporate and military pedophiles is not yet demonic, where does that condition begin?

Ivers/Eure's, sharing the Bee Coat almost, are first known in Dumbartonshire with Lakeys while Leaks/Leakeys are first known in Lincolnshire with Ives'. The latter are probably from Ivo TAILLebois whose wife (Lucy Taillebois) was in Lincolnshire, and who married a Massie liner. Parrs share the double fesses of Honeys and Hone's, in colors reversed with the Dons (Cheshire with Shirts/Shards) in turn sharing an "OMNia" motto term with Ore's/Orrs (Renfrewshire with Montgomerys). Omens are first known in Suffolk with Marjorys. The latter share a six-sectioned Shield (different color) with the Dere's/Deers expected in the Honey motto. Kerrys, first known in Montgomeryshire, have more bees with a hive, and the Kerry Shield is shared by Halps/Halfs, first known in Lincolnshire with Ives'.

Halp-branch Halpers/Halfpennys and SANDYs are first known in Worcestershire, where Jeans/Jane's were previously first known, and while I was on a sandy beach with only the jeans on, Sandys and Sands share the fitchee of Ore's/Orrs. Sands were previously first known in Lancashire with Orrels.

The six-sectioned Shield of Marjorys is shared with Rappers/Rapers, first known in Sussex with Margesons and English Wrights/Rite's. Another six-sectioned Shield is with WheelWRIGHTs who share the antelope (different color) with Rappers/Rapers. Wheel-like Whale's/Whele's are first known in Berwickshire with the Rape-beloved Books and Scottish Wrights/Rite's. The Epstein gang is guilty of rape. Rupe's (Devon with Stewarts and Wheel-beloved Moline's) probably have the Stewart lion while Dols love the Whale's. Wheels are first known in Shropshire with the Dol Alans, the proto-Stewarts. English Wells, likely kin of Tailbois', are first known in Lincolnshire with Restons who in turn share the Wright/Rite leopard faces. Reston-branch Risings/Risons are first known in Norfolk with the earliest Dol Alans in Mileham (see English Alan write-up). German Wells (share pelican with Scottish Stewarts) are first known in Westphalia with Alan-related Velins. Dol is in Vilaine province.

Hampshire is where Hawks are first known having PURPLE "pilGRIM's staves" while Stave's are first known in Northumberland with Grime's/Grimms ("RED bars").

So, my grandfather's first name (Dominic) is playing to the beach scene where I had only jeans, no shirt, which convinces me more that I am to use that Masci-Grimaldi marriage as a pointer to both Thomas Massie and Marjorie Greene. Dominic's place their eight-pointed stars ("mullets") on a "blue border" while Blue's are also Gorms while Gormleys/Grimes' have the Grime/Grimm martlets in colors reversed. See that?

While Corks have the Taylor lion tails, CORCorans have a "hawk rising" in Crest while Risings/Risons, who were at the very end of the Sleeping-Beaty dream, are first known in Norfolk with Purple's and Pilgrims. The Corcoran Shield, and almost the Corcoran Crest, is with Monans, whom I see as a branch of Moons and Monks. Monans substitute the Corcoran hawk with a "falcon rising."

While Grimaldi's of Monaco have a PURPLE throne, English Dominics have a "shield divided barry of four PERPALE." Purple's/PurPULs (Norfolk with Pilgrims) can take us to Pullys (pelican), first known in Yorkshire with the Daisy-beloved Pale's/Palys who are behind "perPALE." The triple bars of Berrys (Devon with Monks) are colors reversed from the triple bars of Grime's/Grimms.

As many surnames use a pelican feeding her young, I reckon that "feeding" can be code for German Fedders because they show a pelican on its nest, but then there are also Feeters listed with Clarens who have two of the triple Clare chevrons. Then, Feets/Fate's (Yorkshire) have the Grime/Grimm fesse-with-martlets three times, and German Grimms even share the sun of Fetters. The latter share the Hesse Coat and Crest while Epsteins (almost the Clare Coat) are first known in Hesse-Nassau, and then while Nassau's love Billets, English Billets are first known in Devon with Monaco-branch Monks (Feather/Fedder colors and format) while Nassau's share the lion of Monaco's. French Billets/Billiards are first known in Maine with Pellicans.

Spanish Jeans have blue towers in both colors of the Blue/Gorm rooster heads, and Towers with Cars are first known in Lancashire with Levers whose gold rooster stands on a "trumpet" (Blue/Gorm rooster heads would be gold in colors reversed). The Trump / Legg stag head is in the Arms of Waterford, and then another gold rooster is with Irish Currys/Corrys (Waterford). The latter are in Car colors while Scottish Corrys (share green dragon with Irish Kilpatricks) and Leggs are first known in the same place as CARsons/Corsons and Scottish Kilpatricks. Irish Currys/Corrys are probably using the saltire of Gospatricks, first known in Northumberland with Grime's/Grimms. In the Dunbar write-up, Gospatricks are said to have escaped to MOCHar, near the first-known Hanna's having the stag head of Hahn- and Hann-connectable Trumps. French Mochs/MOUCHERs share the erect sword of Bondi's/Blondi's, and the latter are at my shirtlessness.

I woke Sleeping Beauty by touching her leg at the knee, and while Knee's are first known in County Down, Downs have a full-sized stag in the colors of the Trump and Legg stag heads. Plus, Down's are first known in Sussex with the Tromp-beloved Acorns sharing the black-on-white Knee stag head. Downs call it a "buck," and Acorns call it a "deer."

I woke her by inadvertently BRUSHing her knee with my hand, and while Jeans/Jane's have the Bruce lion, Brush's, a Bruce branch, are first known in Suffolk with Marjory-beloved Daisys/Dais'. Bruce's derived at Annandale (same place as Leggs). I TOUCHed her knee, and Bruce's and Brush's share the motto of Wears sharing the crosslets of Touch-branch Tufts/Tuffs'. Wearings (Devon with Staggs/Stage's and Wears) are in the Tous/Tosini man "wearing a red shirt with gold buttons."

Beauty was framed in the dream, by God, as my bride. There are multiple reasons for this, heraldically speaking, which I think I can link to Shirts/Shards because they almost have the Coat of English Line's, first known in Oxfordshire with the HARcourts sharing the peacock in Crest with Shirts/Shards while the latter are said to be related to HARborough's. Scottish Line's/Linds are first known in Ayrshire with Harcourt-branch Hare's/Hairs.

English Line's are also Lyon-like Lynes', and Lyons named GLENlyon, near the first-known Scottish Bride's (first known in Crawl-like Crail), and also near the neighboring Balcons who in turn share the Line roses. Scottish Bride's share the Glenny and Glenn martlets. The Scottish Bride Crest is almost the Crest of the same English Line's/Lynes' (same place as Crawls/Crowells), and in colors reversed, the Line/Lynes Crest can be the griffin head of Bridge's, yet the other English Bridge's love the Crabs who come up as "Crail."

Both Bridge surnames are first known in Somerset with English Days' who in turn look very related to French Bride's, and Somerset is also where English Camels (Beauty colors and format) are first known who are in the Crawl/Crowell Crest. Then, Daisys/Dais', pointed to by Marjory Taylor Greene, are first known in Angus with Scottish Bride's. See that?

God told me to WAKE beauty after telling me it's me she loves, and so I now see that this is not about my marriage to Beauty, but Marjory loving the Massie bill to unleash the Epstein files. Love's/Luffs are first known in Oxfordshire with Shirt-connectable Line's, and so let's keep in mind that Shirts point to Pam Bondi while Blonds and Daisys/Dais' are first known in Suffolk, where Love's/Luffs were previously first known.

The WAKE scene can get is to Wax's because they list Wex's for a potential pointer to Les Wexner, Epstein's partner whom Massie, this very week, discovered in an FBI file as a co-conspirator to traffic under-aged girls. Bondi's department was trying to hide this FBI document, and Massie made mincemeat out of her in a congressional inquiry this very week. Good job, Thomas.

Wax's/Wex's share the cross of Vice's/Vice's, the latter first known in Sussex with the Epstein-pointing Mackesys/Margesons, and with the Deans/Dene's sharing the Wax/Wex crescents. Deans/Dene's (Sussex with early Wecks/Wix's/Weekes') almost share the "nihilo" motto term of Wecks/Wix's/Weekes'. Wexner-like Wesners/Weshams (Kirkham) are in the colors and format of Waggs/Wege's, the latter first known in Somerset with Days', with Weeks/Wichs, and with the Axe river in the axes of Wecks/Wix's/Weekes'.

Romanian Elements in the West

Over the last few weeks, I've been saying that the Trots trace to the Trotus river of Romania. This week, I caught notice of a Trotter surname, but couldn't see any evidence in the surname's symbol that Trotters are from Romania way. However, their "ferox" motto term looks partial code for a branch of Roxolani, who lived at least as far north as the Buzau river of Romania along the same Siret river that the Trotus drains into.

The Russian Trotsky surname came to mind, which happens to share the giant Russi and Russell lion, in colors reversed from the Ross lion, and while Varangian Rus were in Romania, Trots are first known in Surrey with Rush's (Ross colors). The Varangians used the Dniester and Siret rivers for travel. A branch of Roxolani were on the Dniester. The Buzau-like Bush's/Bushers share the fleur-de-lys of Trade's/Trotte's.

Trotters share a "Fortis" motto term with the English Forts who in turn share "AUDax" with Roxburghs. The Trotter Chief can be related to the French Chance's because they're first known in Savoy with Aude's expected in the Roxburgh motto, and because Roquefeuil (Languedoc with Rockets, Rocks/Roque's and Roussillon) is in Aude province. French Chance's love the Sun variation of Sinclairs of Russell-like Roslin.

English Chance's are first known in Essex with Pascals while I'm reading: "Scandinavian artifacts [alluding to Varangians of Kiev], including 10th-century swords and axe heads, were discovered in the Danube region and near PASCani, Romania." Sinclairs are from Saint-Clair-L'Eveque while Leveque's share the lamb with Pascals. The Leveque Chief is almost the Trotter Chief.

The Droits/Drewitts may have been Trotus elements because Drews have a PASSant lion in the colors of the Russi and Russell lion. Pascals are also PASS'. Droits/Drewitts, with one rose as code for the Rus, share the triple fleur-de-lys of Courage's, the latter first known in Essex with Pascals. Drews are first known in Wiltshire with the Stars in turn in the Trotter Chief.

The Eure-connectable Bee's in the Fort Chief are first known in Oxfordshire with the Droits/Drewitts, and Drews are also Dreux's while Dreux is a location in Eure province. Eure's essentially share the Bee Coat. English Forts use a rock, the Rock/Roque symbol too. Fort-like Forez's/Forets are first known in Savoy with Aude's. The latter almost have the Coat of Pollets, first known in Somerset with Dacks/Ducks possibly in "auDAX." the Neighboring Pollet-loving Pools are first known in Dorset with Russells.

The Courage's are in the motto of Comyns while Miss Comyns was mother to Adam Kilconquhar, first husband of Marjory Carrick. She later married royal Bruce's while the Bruce lion is with Trotters. I think that Bruce's (Yorkshire) were from Eburovices/Ebroicum of Eure province who named York as Eboracum. The royal Bruce's married Stewarts early while the English Stewart lion is the one also of Russi's and Russells. Stewarts were from Alans, and French Alans (Languedoc with Roussillon) almost share the Trotter Chief. The three-and-three pale bars of Trots are almost the four pale bars that are the Arms of Roussillon.

The Arms of Roussillon included the same eagle as MacDonalds who ruled the seas in Argyllshire, where Herods/Haralds are first known who share the Forez/Foret fesse. Herod Archelaus, with an Argyll-like surname, was banished to Lugdunum, now Lyon, i.e. beside the first-known Forez's/Forets. His brother, Herod Antipas, was banished to another Lugdunum location, now Comminges, and Commings are listed with Comyns. One of the MacDonald Coats share a "constant" motto term with Rus-like Rose's, and Constanta is in Romania.

The Forez/Foret bend is with Rochesters/Wrocesters while Rocks and Rooks are both first known in Worcestershire. The Rochester/Wrocester fesse-with-scallops is in the colors of the Arms of Roquefeuil. Rocket-branch Rooks were previously first known in Oxfordshire with the Tiens'/Thames' and Peare's, both of which share the Worcester (not "Worcester") star. Tiens' are in the motto of Squirrels, previously first known in Worcestershire, but now first know in Devon with treFOIL-using and Rock-related Rods. Isabel of RoqueFEUIL married Hugh of RODez.

Worcesters have a Coat much like the Ely's, Cravens and Ricks, and the latter two trace to Croatians in Rijeka/Rika, where the Arms shows a ROCK with an eagle pouring out Water. German Belows have a black-double-headed eagle to go with the black, double-headed eagle pouring out water in the Arms of Rijeka. Maxwells of ROXburghshire have a black, double-headed eagle.

Ely's have a form of the Muscat Coat because the latter were at Ely (Cambridgeshire with Rock-loving Rumillys). Muschats (not "Muscat") share the WATER and Epstein Coat, and thus the Epstein-Maxwell crime ring can link to globalist Rockefellers. Works are first known in Essex with an Epping location, and with the first-known Waters and Muschats. Elis'/Elys' and Rook-branch Rookbys are first known in Yorkshire with English Below's having poured-out water, and with Craven, and then Rumilly-Skiptons of Craven share the purple lion with Folls suspect as a branch of Foils from the namers of "RoqueFEUIL."

Fellows are first known in Huntingdonshire (beside Cambridgeshire) with the Gains almost having the Worcester Coat. Fellers have trefoils too, as do Falls'/Fallis', first known in Midlothian with Sinclairs having a "WORK" motto term. The Worcester Coat is almost the one of Trip-connectable Gore's while TRYPillians were south of Kiev with the Dnieper-river Roxolani.

The Arms of Roquefeuil has billets while English Billets (Devon with Rods) share the Coat of Bellows (not "Below") who are in turn in the "bellows" of Skipton-like Shiptons (Oxfordshire). Fox-using Fes'/Fez's are first known in Auvergne with Foix's/Foys while Irish Foys share the Ely-like "eel" with Shiptons. The latter are suspect as a branch of purple-lion Skiptons, first known in Yorkshire with English Lacys sharing the Coat of English Foys. Foix is a province beside Roquefeuil.

Bellows and Thy's (Sinclair motto) have a fox head while the fox of Fes'/Fez's is in the colors of the giant rose of Foils (Hampshire with GHENTs). English RooseVELTs have a giant eagle in those colors, and Dutch Roosevelts have a "PLANTavit" motto term while FELTs (Holland with fox-using Thy's and Dutch Roosevelts) have the Coat of Bouillons (Auvergne with Fes-/Fez's) in colors reversed. Plant-beloved Cabbage's are first known in Northamptonshire with Folls, and Geoffrey PlantaGENET was a Foll-like Fulk. Fulke's/Volks are first known in Norfolk with Purple's while German Folks/Volks have a purple thistle.

French Roches' are first known in Burgundy with Loches'/Desloges' while Miss Loches married Fulk I of Anjou. French Roches' share the giant moline of Mathis' (Burgundy) that is co-owned by Chives' of Tarves while Tarvisium is where Bellow-beloved Vita's are first known. "PlantaVIT." Chives' were previously first known in Devon with Bellow-branch Billets and Moline's.

Chives-like Chiava's are first known in L'Aquila, making the Roosevelt eagle look like the eagle in the Arms of L'Aquila because the Roosevelt eagle is in the colors of the Chiava and Clave keys. Clave's, with a saltire-by-keys in the colors of the French Loge saltire, are first known in Burgundy with the Loches'/DesLoge's. The same-colored fox of Fez's takes us to fez in Morocco, where the family of Idris, king of Morocco lived whose wife lived in Aures with Shawia Numidians. Chives' are also SHEWas'.

An Aures-like name ended by an 'n,' such as "Arran," could have developed from/to "Auvergne" where the 'u' in "Aures" developed into a 'v'. Baileys and their Baliol kin were from near Airaines, and Baileys share the stars of Foix's/Foys, first known in Auvergne. These Foix's/Foys love the Pellets, first known in Sussex with English Maxwell- and BELLair-beloved Loge's/Lodge's. Alexander, brother of king Baliol, could take us to English Alexanders, first known in Kintyre (beside Arran) with MacDonalds.

"Amo" is a motto term shared between Bellairs/Blairs (share Maxwell symbols) and Scottish Scotts (Roxburghshire with Maxwells). English Scotts trace themselves to Alexander, brother of king Baliol. Scottish Scotts share the Coat of Scottish Terras' in the Alexander and MacDonald motto, and these Terras' are first known in Moray with Bailey-related Innis', and then Baileys share the Moray stars to boot. German Terras' love the Rooks. Innis' (Moray Coat in colors reversed) share the stars of Ballendens (Roxburghshire, and Scottish Terras' are first known in BALLENDen.

I've had the gumption to trace Scottish and Irish Alexanders all the way back to the Alexander-named Maccabee's who probably picked up the name from the Seleucid king, Alexander Balas, for he had formed an alliance with Jonathan Maccabee, and thus inter-marriage between the two royal families could be expected. The Alexanders of Kintyre were beside the first-known MacAbee's of Arran. Scottish and Irish Alexanders could be sharing the Shield of German Folks'/Volks', but the point is that Balas' share the blue cross of Ballendens in half their colors while Balas' share the giant ermine with French Balls/BALLANDs.

The Balas cross is shared with Orions/Irons of Airaines, near ABBEville, and wile MacAbee's are also MacAbbe's, Baileys are said to have been at "Bailleul-En-Vimeu which is about six miles south of Abbeyville..." in Picardy. French Pickards are first known in Moray.

The purple colors we've met up with to this point reminds that purple-robed Mystery Babylon is depicted, in Revelation 18, as an entity of world trade, a thing which certain Rockefellers became obsessed with to the point of insanities, to the point where they lost contact with normalcy, shifting their morals and their view of realities until subservient to money-lust.

In the book of Daniel, the end-time anti-Christ is shown extending from king Antiochus IV (invaded Jerusalem successfully), and some historians have suspected that he was the father of Alexander Balas. The end-time anti-Christ will have Mystery Babylon riding on his back in vain.

We saw the link above between Balas', Ballendens and French Balls. Ballens (Cornwall with Pasco's) share the giant lion of PASCo's and English Balls/Balds, first known in Cheshire with Bellows, and where purple-Shielded English Pace's were previously first known while Italian Pace's are listed with Pasi's/PASCels. The Ballen and Ball/Bald lion is combattant with Wirrals (Cheshire with Mails of Wirral) while Bellows are first known in Wirral). Wirrals are said to have "cups" yet they look like the "chalice" of English Belows.

Bellows are beloved of Skiptons-like Shiptons, and Skiptons share the giant and purple lion with Folls while "FULCrum" is a motto term of Balls/Balds. Baldwins, likely from king Baldwin of Jerusalem, are first known in Shropshire with BELL-branch Bellamys, and with the Hunters/Hunts in turn sharing the vertically-split Shield of Alexanders and purple-thistle Folks/Volks. "Fulcrum" could be part-code for Rums (Dumfries with Bells), and then Rumillys have nine lilies and nine rocks while Lille's (Oxfordshire with Shiptons) share the Balas cross in both colors. Baileys have nine stars. The Orions/Irons sharing the same cross are first known in Norfolk with Fulke's/Folks/Volks.

Last week, I heraldically investigated a new dream where I think I saw Jeffrey Epstein driving a VOLKSwagen van. It wouldn't be surprising if the bottom line of Epstein is the Rockefeller cabal. German Fulks could be using the wings of the same-colored, Below eagle. Fulk V of Anjou became a king of Jerusalem. The Arms of Roquefeuil shares gold billets with Nassau's while Epsteins are first known in Hesse-Nassau. Hesse's share a Hessel variation with Hazels, first known in Devon with English Billets and Esse's. French Billets/Billiards and Billiards/Hilliards, share the Bailey stars.

Crisis Actors but Not a Psy-Op

In the 3rd minute of the video below, the question is asked whether the family of Erika Frantzve closely knows the family of Tyler Robinson (alleged killer of Charlie Kirk). It makes sense to me, because I claim that the shooting was an actor-crisis production. I feel that Tyler's court case is a sham, scripted, and that Tyler won't be penalized, and is probably not in prison at all, unless he's being paid millions to sit there for some of the time. The military knows how to conduct faked court cases because it's been forced to do so many times before in faked events where the criminal doesn't get shot at the scene.

I don't know why Tyler wasn't shot or fake-shot at the scene. Some believe that he was a paid actor now being betrayed by the military, where his court case and sentencing is real. I doubt this scenario because I sense that his parents are in on the fakery, and so the military won't betray whole families, because it doesn't want word to get out that its crisis actors are betrayed. The military has networks of crisis actors for fomenting political situations all over the world.

The video below is asking whether a relative of Tyler's family paved over the "crime scene" at the Utah university. In this video, Erika's uncle and aunt, the Jewish Jack Solomon and his wife, Karla, not new this week to this story, are said to live in Utah. The video claim is that people are looking into whether Karla's Utah business has previously done business with Tyler's father's construction company. I haven't known until now that Tyler's father has/had a construction company, but private investigators are wanting to know whether he was in charge of covering over the crime scene with a new concrete floor. However, it seems completely reckless (foolish) to have the father of the fake-shooter directly taking such a contract.

In my 3rd update of December, I entered this record:

When I ask google, "was Lori Frantzve born to Alan Rothstein," no answer. However, a google offering has the following, though clicking to the webpage doesn't have it: "Lori Frantzve: Age 75 (Apr 1950). Moriah Solomon: Age 32 (Jun 1993). Richard ... Allan Rothstein: Age 67 (Apr 1958). Amanda Schaaf: Age 39 (Sep 1986)." That data is supposed to be [or once was] at the following webpage about Karla Solomon, but it's not there. Kent Frantzve (born 1948), Erika's father, is on this page, with a link to his page:
https://www.fastpeoplesearch.com/karla-solomon_id_G5739260519982680453

The video then reveals that the sister (Karla) of Erika's father married Jack Solomon, which recalls that Salome's/Solomons are first known in Rhineland with Frans'/Frantz's, and with the Frankfurt home of the first Rothschild banker (18th century, not too long ago). Jack Solomon was involved in a criminal-casino scheme with Norman VANCE, both of Las Vegas, and Salome's/Solomons share the bend-with-stars of Vance's/Vaux's. It looks like all in the family, begging whether JD Vance, whom Erica loves, is related to Norman Vance's ancestors.

On Kent Frantzve's page, his "spouse" is revealed as "Charlynn Frantzve," and although "Lori Frantzve" is also listed there, she's not pointed out as Kent's wife. Kent's address is given as Surprise, Arizona, in Maricopa county, very near to where Erika lives (likewise in Maricopa country). Erika said that her mother moved to Arizona for a military-related business, but it looks like maybe she's there to work with Kent. The latter works for the Israeli military. Surprise is also where Karla Solomon and Charlynn Frantzve are listed.

Here's the video asking whether Erika's family knows Tyler's family, though there's nothing of hard evidence for the theory:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BY0inDnyBc

There is a German Karla/KarlMANN/KarLOCK surname, first known in Rhineland with Solomons and Frantz's. A "mann" suffix usually denotes a Jewish surname, often from the Ashkenazi "Jews", from the KHAZar ruling class. Note how this surname may have married Locks to form the Karlock variation, for Scottish Locks (Lanarkshire with CASeys and Swans) share the swan with Criss', and the latter are my pointer to CRISIS actors. Criss' are in the colors and format of half the Karla/Karlock Coat.

Criss' are listed with Christmans while English Christmans are first known in Hampshire with Chase's while Case's (Norfolk with Crows) are in Solomon / Vance colors and format. Caseys above use crow heads. Case's almost have the Coat of Leslie's, first known in Kabardino-like Aberdeenshire with Carls. Leslie's were earls of proto-Rothschild Rothes (Scottish location).

It's somewhat rare to find an heraldic symbol facing the left side of the Shield (viewer's right), but both the Jewish Rothchilds/Rots (not "Rothschild") and Irish Karla's/Carlins have a white and upright horse facing left, and moreover there is a rare, left-rising bend in the Jewish Rothchild/Rot Crest in the colors of the left-rising bend-by-lizards of Karla's/Carlins (share Keen/Kane Coat and Crest). The latter are also KEARlynds, and share the estoiles of Irish Carrs while English Cars (Lancashire with CHARLie's/CORLeys) are also Kears. Carmans (Cumberland with Vance-branch Vaux's) were kin of both Kirk surnames.

The KearLYND variation could give away that Car elements married Scottish Lynds/Line's to produce the surname, because Lynds/Line's share crossed spears (different colors) with Spears/SPEYers while Rothes in on the Spey river, while German Rothschilds/ROTHSTEINs are first known in Speyer. English Line's (share Rothschild/Rot roses) are first known in Oxfordshire with Crow-branch Crowells.

In the dream, I was transported from the shark-in-pool scene to a body of BLUE OCEAN WATER, and Oceans/Cains/Kane's/Keans have variations just like the Karla-related Keens, suggesting that Karla Solomon is an Epstein animal, for Waters share the Epstein Coat. Blue's are first known in Arran with the McCabe's having "salmon" in the colors of the Kane/Cain "fish," and, so amazing, Salmon-like Salome's list Solomons!!! Zowie, how can that be coincidental? It's suddenly linking the dream on Epstein's island to the friends and/or relatives of Lorin Frantzve.

The Oceans/Kane's probably point to Ro Khanna, who co-sponsored the bill of Thomas Massie to get the Epstein files released.

The other Irish Kane's/Cains use the fish in the colors of the Roach fish, and the latter Coat is in the colors and format of the Call trumpets. The white-on-green fish of Kane's/Cains are also those of VISSers, while Epstein's pilot was Mr. Visovski. Tromp-connectable Vise's/Vice's, sharing the cross of Wex's for what looks like a pointer to Les Wexner, are first known in Sussex with the Hams sharing the very-same "salmon" as McCabe's, which are white-on-green, same colors as the Kane and Visser "fish." Obama's Andrew McCabe comes to mind, a close friend of the Clintons.

The Roach write-up, and their rock in Crest, betray that Roach's were of the FellTRAGER variation of Rocco- and Trager-related Fellers. Rockefellers, that is, kin of Rods, and the latter are first known in Devon with Rope's while Roach's are said to have been "Rupe" too.

Just think of how elated or depressed Charlie is at this moment as he watches half the world accusing Erika and Turning point of murdering him. If he was forced out of TP, he's expected to be elated.

The fact that Erika is publicly pushing for Tyler's conviction should be proof enough for everyone to realize that no murder took place, for if Tyler was set up to give appearances of taking the shot, which is what most believe, then he himself knows he didn't take the shot, did not kill Charlie, and therefore he would have told this story to his parents as they visit him in jail, and they in turn would have told the whole world what the plotters did, and are still doing, to criminally frame their son.

But as Tyler is not speaking in that way, this is how we know he and his parents are going along with the fake trial, as part of it. They're being paid off, we can safely assume. What's Baron's problem that he hasn't yet figured this out? Why is Candace kicking against these goads to her own detriment? Why do they insist on framing the event as a true murder when it obviously is not, knowing all we know now?

The trial will be modified as need be to make it appear authentic. Those conducting it are being paid, and the ones paying are seeking to learn best how to conduct faked trials for future operations. Makes sense. The prosecution needs to ignore a mountain of evidence that Tyler is not guilty. That can't be fun. And the defence team likewise needs to ignore most of it if the plot is to get a conviction. The defence team could enter into court "evidence" what nobody's heard of in the past, concocted evidence to give appearances to the public that the defence team is punching-mad and authentic.

One of the best arguments for deciding whether the Frantzve's were involved in child abuse in Romanian Angels comes from the information at the video below (now weeks old):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBQI8fat80s

In the video, we find a pastor, Greg Laurie, whom God seems to be pointing to without doubt where German Greggs have the Ukraine flag in colors reversed, which is used also by Romanians/Romans. But there is also Greg's surname, which comes up as "Lorry," and then Lorin Frantzve is usually, "Lori." Greg Laurie's church hosted the kick-off to a Turning-Point outreach a few weeks ago, and he's embroiled in law suits, where the plaintiffs feel there's enough evidence to get a conviction against some who were trafficking / molesting boys in Romania's Bucharest, very near Romanian Angels.

Plus, note "BuchaREST," for by some coincidence or not, Buchars are listed with French Buchards while English Buchards are first known in Lincolnshire with RESTons. The latter show only leopard faces while Buchars/Buchards show only leopards.

A child molester is a "bugger," so unthinkable, and then English Bugs use "water bougets." Waters share the Epstein Coat. I learned that water bougets were "water containers," and afterward someone emailed me to suggest "water BUCKET." I therefore became familiar with two Bucket surnames, one listed with the English Buchards above, and the other listed with French BOQUETs/Bucards, first known in Normandy with Buchars/Buchards.

I remember that, years ago, google's definition of a water bouget was exactly a "water CONTAINer," and in recent weeks, I elaborated on a dream I had where a fried asked me to get him a "container." It pointed to Contans/Constants and thereby to Constanta. See that? Even the bugger-like Bugs can point to Constanta via their water bouget, yet the Bug bat can point to count Dracula of Romania's Wallachia. Perhaps the concept of a human vampire started as a child-molesting bugger. Bugs are first known in Dorset, beside Drake's, and Nicholas de Vere von Drakenberg traced his Vere-family witchcraft to Transylvania (in proto-Romania), home of the real, count Dracula.

Vere's may have been named from "Varangians" of Ukraine as they spread into Romania. I can show that Varangians named Veringers of Baden, and the Greggs above are first known in Baden. While both Bug surnames are in the colors of German Bogans (giant bow), English Bogans, with the Drake wyvern dragon in the colors of the Cork lion tails, are first known in Cornwall with Corks and bow-using Bude's.

However, the Bogan dragon is shown as a cockaTRICE probably due to Trice's/Trysts, first known in Cornwall...with Bat-connectable Batons/Bastons (bat wings). Note how the wings of the wyvern and cockatrice show bat wings. Bats are first known in Shropshire with the Brechs while Brecons share the Bucket/Buchard Coat. Bouget-using Bugs love the Bats (probably Baden elements).

Google's definition of the heraldic water bouget is now: "A heraldic water bouget is an ancient, highly stylized charge representing a pair of leather BAGs or vessels, used by medieval soldiers to carry water..." It seems that God has arranged the Bug-like Bag surname to have the cinquefoils of Buckets/Boquets in colors reversed, and moreover Bags are first known in GAYwood.

Note "TRANSylvania," for while Wallachia-line Walchs have a "Transfixus," motto term, Trans'/Trents were kin of Frans'/Frantz's. Frants/Friends were previously first known in Somerset (beside Bugs of Dorset) with Badens/BATTins and Trans'/Trents, and Frants/Friends are now first known in Nottinghamshire, where Bugs were previously first known. German Bugs are first known in Hamburg with Ukrainian-liner Trips/Treffs. There are two Bug rivers in Ukraine.

French Buckets/Boquets share the cinquefoils of Gangs/Geggs, first known in Norfolk with Bags, and "Gang" is a motto term of Scottish Drummonds, known to descend from Varangian Rus of Ukraine. German Drummonds are first known in Hamburg with Trips/Treffs. Scottish Drummonds share the Coat of Bassets, first known in Staffordshire with Lane's/Lawns, but naming Ouilly-le-Basset in Normandy i.e. where French Buckets/Boquets are first known.

The Bug river is at LVIV of Ukraine, and if that location was named as, L'Viv," note the "viVIS" motto term of Carrick-branch Craigie's and the "Vive" of Carrick-branch Craigs. Vivians/Veys are first known in Cornwall with Carrick-branch Carrots/Carews and Bude's while Dutch Veys have a boot.

English Bugs share the fesse of Carricks who in turn share a "Garde" motto term with Lane's/Lawns (same place as English Docks), and then Lori Frantzve was born, Miss Lane. Craigs share a brown horse with Lane's/Lawns. As Craggs (not "Craig") share the black dog with Carricks who are in turn in the colors of English Greggs, it's a no-brainer to realize that German Greggs/Graggs of Baden were a Carrick branch. And then Bachs/BAGHs have another black dog while Dogs/Docks share the cinquefoil of Bus' (Norfolk with Bags) which itself is giant and colors reversed from the giant cinquefoil of Pockets, the latter first known in Lincolnshire with Buckets/BOCKETs/Buchards. Lane-like Lanarks share the Dog/Dock cinquefoil too.

Lane's/Lawns look very connectable to Somerset's Days' so that Marjorie Taylor Greene can point to a feasible Epstein link to Romanian Angels, an idea some are kicking around for further investigation. Marjory/Margaret Carrick comes to mind here, and while she married Bruce's, the giant Bruce lion is with English Docks (same place as Lane's/Lawns and ARROWs) while the Carrick/Kerrick dog can bring us to Dogs/Docks and MurDOCKs, kin of Margys/Mackeys. The latter two surnames use ravens hanging on an arrow, and German Bugs show ravens but call them "black birds" while Birds/Burds are first known in Cheshire with Kerricks.

Bugs bunny might just have been secretly a pedophile symbol if bunnies were a pedophile symbol in those days. Bunnys are first known in Nottinghamshire with Goats/Gothams and early Bugs, and the latter are in the colors of Bunny-beloved Goats/Gothams.

Bugs was always eating a carrot, and Carrots/Carews (look related to the part of the Lane/Lawn Coat) share a "bien" motto term of Carricks/Kerricks/CORRICKs (same place as Murdocks and Margys/Mackeys). Carots/Cairons/Carows (Cornwall with Taylor-beloved CORKs and same-colored, Bug-connectable Bogans) are first known in Normandy. Carrots/Carews could be using the lion in the Crest of Epstein-pointable Mackesys/Margesons, and moreover Daisy-loving Marjorys are first known in Suffolk with Clare's who in turn ruled at Pembroke while Carrots/Carews have: "Dugdale and most other authorities, believe that the family is denominated from Carew Castle in Pembrokeshire."

We're now in Wales, possibly named by Wallachians, and the Brecon part of Wales takes us to Brecons, first known in Angus with Daisys/Dais', and sharing the Bucket/Buchard Coat. Bracks/Brackens, with a dog on a fesse colors reversed from the Carrick/Corrick fesse, are first known in Bavaria with the Bug-colored Bugle's/BUGERs/Bogans, with Craigie-connectable Goz's, and with Deck-connectable Kimmers/Cammers.

Pembrokeshire (near Cairon-like Carns) is where pear-using Parrots are first known while "J'esPERE" is a Carrot/Carew motto term. Caens (Dorset with Bugs) use "PERimus" while sharing the Pear leopard faces, and Carots/Cairons are said to be from Caen (Normandy). One could fathom a Dog surname developing from Douglas / Dougal liners who married Caen/Cann liners, especially the dog-using Canossa's (see google). The Caen-beloved Pears are first known in Oxfordshire with Bone-branch Bunns.

Mus at Lake Van, land of king Rusa, was home to Nairi, and Neuri were on the Bug river. Rusa is suspect to the Rus-Alans, the Roxolani. Rusa was conquered by Cimmerians from proto-Ukraine, and Cimmerians are thought to have settled Wales. The latter's red dragon could be secret code for the Dracula family of Wallachia. The Nairi-like Nairn region is where the Rats are first known suspect in the "serRATa" motto term below. Cimmerian-like Kimmers/Cammers could have been a branch of Kemmis'/Camois', previously first known in Gloucestershire, where Walls/Wales' and Cams are first known. According to Herodotus, Neuri had a wolf deity, and then Norrys share a wolf head (different color) in Crest with Walls/Wales'.

Hugh Lupus (Cheshire with Mace's/Maceys, beside Wales), a friend of Hamon de Massey, had a white wolf-head symbol, the one of Bathers, and Hugh's (Wales) have a "Kymmer" motto term. Kimmers/Cammers share the fleur of Cheshire's Masseys/Massie's/Maceys. Lake Van is probably to the FIENs/Fane's/Vans (Monmouthshire, Wales) sharing the Mace/Macey gauntlet. Masons/Massins (Kent with Gaunts, FIENS/Finis', Virgins, Hamons and Nair-connectable Sidneys) share the merMAID in Crest with Nairi-like Nairs, and then Maids (Cheshire) were kin of Monmouths. Fiens/Finis' share the lions of Gale's who in turn likely have, in their motto, the Fame variation of Fiens/Fane's/Vans.

I had read that the "MAIDen" in the Arms of Gaunt is also a "virgin," probably because Maids share the giant lion of Virgins, a possible pointer, in this Mace and Massie context, to Epstein in the Virgin Islands. Nancy Mace unwaveringly supported Thomas Massie until they secured the law with unwavering, Marjorie. German Babe's/Babels (Bavaria with Kimmers/Cammers) have another mermaid while English Babe's share the six bars of Nays while Nairs are also Nayers. English Babe's are first known in Suffolk with Bondi-connectable Blonds and Blondville's while Blundville's (Cheshire) descended from Hugh Lupus and Ranulph le Meschin. The latter is suspect (by me) as a Masci branch from the ancestry of Hamon de Masci. "Hamon de Massey (I), the first Baron of Dunham Massey, was born around 1056 in La Ferte-Mace, France. He was a follower of Hugh Lupus (Earl of Chester) and held manors in Cheshire..."

I'm guessing that LANE's/Lawns have the Douglas crown because the Roys in the Lane/Lawn motto, sharing the Dougal lion, are first known in LANarkshire with Locks, Douglas-descended HARDys, and Douglas-related LockHEARTs/LockHARDs. The Douglas crown comes with a HEART. Heartys/Hards share the Lane/Lawn lion. Lockhearts have a "serrata" motto term to go with the "sera" of Fulke's/FOLks. "That's All Folks." Sarah's/Sayers, first known in Essex with Seers, share the bend of Bunny-beloved Goats/Gothams, and while "sara" is a motto term of Russells who almost have the full Fulke/Folk motto, Bugs are now first known in Dorset with Russells.

In the video below, Epstein's former butler accuses GhisLAINE Maxwell of seeking young girls in the "eastern countries," and "Romania" is mentioned at 1:25:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWrKvs_YA4Y

The butler's surname, Rodriguez, takes us to Spanish Rodriguez' sharing the lone Kirk tower in a possible pointer to Erika Kirk at Romanian Angels. KIRKners (show a church) and German Dragons/Darno's (wyvern dragon) are first known in Silesia with the Biens in the Carrick and Carrot/Carew motto, and then French Biens show only axes while one Axe river is in Somerset with the first-known Church's.

Towers are first known in Lancashire with Kirkbys, and Tower-branch Tours/TORS' are first known in Languedoc with Contans/Constants and RODez's/Roders. Contans/Constants love the Tree's who in turn love the Knights while French Rodriguez' have a giant "knight." The Bugle/Buger/Bogan Crest has the "TORSo" of a "man" with bow.

By what coincidence do Spanish Rodriguez' have a "GREEN border charged with eight heraldic pine CONES"? Greens are first known in Kent with Cone's, and while Cone's share the Conte antlers, Contans/Constants use the pine tree. Mr. Rodriguez of the Epstein crime ring is pointing to Constanta.

Back to the Bugle/Buger man, for Scottish Mans love the Dragons/DRAINers. The Bugle/Buger bow is in pale and in black, linkable to the lone pale bar of Taylor-related Blake's, and Blacks (Lincolnshire with TAILbois' and Vicks/Vecks) were DRAIN kin. Vicks/Vecks show only a lone pale bar in the colors and format of the Rodriguez knight. Weekes'/Wix's have a black-axe Coat version of the Badens/Battins, and the latter are first known in Somerset with Weeks/Wichs and Rhodes-related Baths.

The Axe river is near Bath of Somerset, and while Days' are first known in Somerset too, DAYkins, listed with axe-using Decans below, have "Daykin de Wich" in their write-up. Daisy-beloved Marjorys are first known in Suffolk with Deacons (share Decan Coat). Decks/Daggers and Dutch Dyke's share the Massie fleur-de-lys, and the red squirrel with a Dutch Dyke surname who in turn share the annulets of Beauty-beloved Bulls (Somerset with Ducks/Dacks). Sleeping Beauty as the Marjorie-Massie-Mace team is pointing to buggers. Duke's are first known in Devon with Squirrels.

Axes are with Dragon-loving Drake's (near Penes'/Pennys), Deacons and Decans (look like Rhodes / Bath kin) while the Decani region on the White DRIN river (Albania) likely explains the Drainer variation, for PenDRAGONs are likely from the Penestae Illyrians on the Black Drin river. The latter river was home to the Cavii, the line to the Chiava's, first known in L'Aquila, explaining the "Aquila" motto term of Drake's. The Drake write-up once had some allusion or blurb as per the walk or gait of a duck, and Duke's (Devon with Gaits/Gates', Dragon-loving Ware's, and Vere-branch Wears and Wearings) share the horizontally-split colors of Foss' (Sussex with Margesons and Mascals) while Fossa is beside L'Aquila. Bill Gates, bugger.

ShelDRAKE's (Essex with Vere's/Vairs), sharing the Shall fesse, use sheldrake ducks. Shells (share Massie fleur), first known in Westphalia with Ducks/Dockers, love the Snake's (Kent with Dragons/Drainers). Shalls almost have the Coat of Table's (Devon with a second Axe river, but also in Cheshire with Massie's).

Proof that Ms. Greene and Mr. Massie were in the Sleeping Beauty dream, were the Grimaldi and Masci surnames of my mother's brother (Dominic), and the two were born in Picenze, just seven miles from L'Aquila. Ferrats/Fers (Vair branch) are first known in Brittany with MUSys. "FiuMUS" is a Wear motto, and Masci's/Mascelli's, along with pine-cone Mascarelli's, are first known in Piedmont with MontFERRAT, and the latter's rulers put out the rulers of Saluzzo, home of THOMAS of Saluzzo. Thomas Massie. Cone's are first known in Kent with Drake-beloved Dragons/Drainers, and Conys in Lincolnshire with Drain-related Blacks.

Axe-using Drake's have: "...Drake of Ashe, near AXminster." Ash's/Esse's are first known in Devon with Hazels/Hessels while German Ash's have, in colors reversed, the Coat of Epsteins, first known in Hesse while Hesse's are Hessels too. Drake's have the Masci-connectable Muscas' in their motto.

The White Drin is partly in KOSovo while Cousins, linkable to Constants via Cussons, are first known in Norfolk with a Docking location that houseofnames thinks was of the Decans (I'm not sure about that). Decans/Daykins (Deck/Dagger colors) have a "RIBBON on the wRIST" while Ristons/Risons are first known in Norfolk with early Deacons ("PARAtus") and Pratts, and beside the first-known Deacons. Ribons are listed with Rayburns whose "roebuck" takes us to Roe's and Bucks, both first known in Norfolk.

The Reston branch of Ristons/Risons could be a pointer to BuchaREST. The Ardiaei line to Irish Arthurs use a "rest." Scottish Daggers/Dackers are first known in Cumberland with Dockers, and Ducks/Dacks in Somerset with Baths. It could be that all of these similar surnames descend from the namers of Decani or a branch thereof.

The Prut river of Romania, named anciently with such terms as "Paratus," can be to the Pratts, in which case Cousins and Cussons both appear to be from rulers of Constanta, not Kosovo. I suppose that Cousin liners could have named Kosovo.

Pratts look like kin of Flys in the English-version motto of Drake's (Hampshire with Porters and Flys). Drake-like Thrace had a ruler(s), Cotys, and English Cotys' are listed with ArchDEACONs. French Constants, same place as Cotta's/Cotys' and Porter-connectable Costs. Arch's are in the colors and format of the triple Blois dragons. Thracians on the Drin rivers make sense where Ardiaei-like Arda was in central Thrace. Mythical Pendragon birthed mythical king Arthur to reveal an Arthur-surname marital link to a line of Penestae, and while the latter lived at their capital of Uscana, Oscans were at L'Aquila.

Decani may have been named by the Dexaroi, for the latter were also the "Dassaretae" shown on some maps upon the Apsus river, near Uscana shown on this map. To the east of the Ardiaei at Rison-like RHIZON, this second map shows the "Dassareti" smack at the Decani theater (Decani not shown). In the first map, note how close the AXius river is to the Drilon, for the latter is now the Black Drin. Decans and Deacons use axes.

I APSUS river is most-definitely to the Apps'/Epps, highly suspect by me in naming Eppsteins. The latter are first known in Hesse while proto-Hesse elements may have named Has, an Albanian location now at the northern-most part of the Black Drin, and therefore near Decani. The White Drin is shown unmarked at Gabuleum.

As Epsteins share the MUSCHat/Montfitchet Coat while Gernons lived in Montfitchet while the son and heir of Ranulph le MESCHin was Ranulph de Gernon, we are back to the line of Hamon de Masci of DUNHAM Massey. I'm just wondering whether God arranged the Butler Coat to be the Dunham Coat in colors reversed as a snitch on an Obama alliance with Mr. Rodriguez the butler. Obama's mother was Anne Dunham, descended from mayor Wolflin. I read that Wolflins became Wolfleys, and the latter are first known in Cheshire while using the wolf of Hugh Lupus in colors reversed. Note "WolFLIN," for Flinns have the Wolfley wolf in colors reversed. Flans are listed with Flints (Flintshire, beside/near Cheshire).

If you're rushed for time, start the video below at 4 minutes to see very good evidence that Ghislaine Maxwell is not in prison, nor on trial:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1st1tBH_0s

There could now be a logical reason that she was transferred to a Texas jail, because it's in on the hoax. That jailhouse knows she's not in the jail. Or, a double is in the jail under a contract to make millions by the time she's released. In this picture, Trump will pardon her in due time, as planned, so that the jailhouse doesn't need to play the game any longer in the daily routine with other inmates.

On September 8, two days before Charlie faked his death, a $350,000 payment was made by "A shell vendor attached to TPUSA" through Jeffrey Epstein's bank. This is the story in the video below, but the stated purpose for this money, to pay off Charlie's killer, is obviously incorrect.

What could a shell vendor be? How did the person reporting this know that it was a shell vendor? google AI: "A shell vendor typically refers to a business entity that exists primarily on paper, possessing no significant assets, active operations, or employees. While not always illegal, these 'shell' entities are frequently used for holding assets, tax avoidance, or in some cases, illicit activities like money laundering, fraud, and hiding beneficiary ownership."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sw8VpcYiXV0

Shortly before 10 minutes above, we see potential Epstein connections to military at Fort Huachuca, via a daughter of Epstein's plane pilot (of the "Lolita Express"), Larry Visovski.

Baron Coleman

On Baron Coleman's Wednesday show, he shows that Lorin Frantzve is/was part in an Intelligence group that doubles as a defence think tank. He begs the question as to why she stated up an orphanage, near a military base, in Constanta while she was a military employee. What "business" would the military base wish for in having an orphanage? A good question. Makes no GOOD sense.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TnlxpLSTnYE

On that show, Baron entertains a gunshot from some other building rooves, because he's sure the shot didn't come from Tyler Robinson. Ya-but, Baron's desperate for figuring out how Charlie was killed because he's trying to ignore the hard-as-rock evidence that Charlie was not killed. Plus, there was a video of a man-with-rifle lying on the Losee-Center roof, pointing a gun toward Charlie, where Tyler allegedly took the shot. According to a tipster to Candace, and media evidence on the day of the shooting, this man-with-rifle was dressed in tactical clothes. Neither I nor her think it was Tyler, but my point is that Baron should be telling his audience that this man took a shot, but did not hit Charlie. That shot was heard by the audience and the camera mics, and thus serves as more evidence that Charlie was not killed.

Baron could argue that the man in tactical clothes did not take a shot, but was up there to draw attention away from the real shooter on some other roof, and moreover was up there in hopes of framing Tyler Robinson. But in order to frame Robinson, the plotters would have released a photo of him with gun up there. Yet, the tipster to Candace, who is the only person to reveal then man with gun on that roof, doesn't seem like he's interested in framing Tyler. If I recall correctly, this tipster was presenting evidence that the man with gun (rifle) was not Tyler.

Even if Tyler played a minor role merely to give appearances of planting a rifle, and even if he didn't know that the plotters were planting his own rifle under some trees, he is yet expected to tell his parents his side of the story, that he took no shot, that he was merely acting out a script on a day prior to the shooting event, rather than to just rot in jail for the rest of his life by saying nothing to defend himself. Baron's a lawyer, yet he doesn't realize this? I call foul on him.

He's using this event to get closer to Candace, always complimenting her ideas, always supporting them, not rubbing her the wrong way, which is exactly why he won't entertain the fake-murder theory with any elaboration to speak of. There's a long list of evidences for a fake-murder scenario, but Candace won't go there, and so Baron plays much like her submissive partner.

I've given Baron enough time. I'm calling him out as an evil sham, and by "evil" I'm referring to his selfishness, his abuse of his viewers. He's certain that the bullet didn't come from Tyler, but as he's now telling his audience that he's entertaining a gunshot from some other location, he's hiding his own good senses from his viewers, his own good senses on what Mikey McCoy informs him of. Baron is not stupid in the intellectual sense, yet he's stupid in the wicked sense, for he knows everyone agrees that Mikey McCoy did not see Charlie get shot. Therefore, if there was a true killing, Mikey and his partner, Blake Neff, would not have walked into the line of fire immediately after the first shot rang out.

As not even Baron can come up with a viable / credible / satisfying / plausible method for explaining how Charlie's neck suffered a wound apart from a gunshot from a distance, the only alternative apart from a true gunshot is a faked gunshot, yet Baron, the MORAL STUPID, refuses to light that fire with his audience, partly because he doesn't want to look intellectually stupid for not asserting a faked death in months gone by. He's stringing his audience along, gobbling up its cash. Blah-blah-drag-on Candace, who mostly over-speaks week after week, is the one on whose behalf Baron conveniently refuses to entertain a faked-death scenario.

As nobody has seen Charlie's burial or funeral, and as there's evidence of a staged casket production, why would anyone argue that some gun-device on Charlie's body killed him when it's 100 times simpler and less-obvious to place a Hollywood device on his body to fake a gunshot? Baron's not making that argument probably because it's not a valid method of killing him, but then why does half the world believe that Charlie was killed at all when it's so easy to deduce that, if there was no bullet, it must have been a fake bullet. How does Baron's intellect fly the coop on this one? If he can easily grasp it, why won't he touch it? It looks like a spiritual problem, sinful. He's choosing the wrong for a sinful reason; otherwise, he'd be more open to a faked event. He prefers his electrocution killing over a faked event. Why? Didn't he see that Charlie's team was faking a death scene when attending him on the ground?

On his Sunday show this week, Baron argued that, if he's alive, Charlie isn't expected to allow his wife and former TP members to undergo all the scandals they are going through, but should instead pop up from where he's hiding to alleviate them of those scandals, like maybe say something like, "I was only joking." To the contrary, the scandalous backlash on the team would only get worse. Besides, Baron assumes that Charlie isn't angry with the team, and with his wife (or whatever she is to him), for pushing him out of TP. Baron talks calculatively as though Charlie loves Erika but stands idly by while she suffers (if indeed he's alive). He talks that way (on Sunday, anyway) to make his argument hold water while acting oblivious to the possibility that Charlie has come to hate her. It's to Baron's selfish advantage to act oblivious to the flip side of his own coin.

Besides, for all we know, Charlie has offered to end the hoax, but has been turned down by TP. Or, there may be an official contract for producing the hoax, if it's legal to feign your own death with support from others, providing you don't sign a government death certificate or rob an insurance company for death benefits.

When Charlie allowed the transfer, or personally called for it, of $350,000 to a TP company to buy a massive death-insurance policy, doesn't that reveal his planning a faked death? He therefore made sure to tell people, shortly before the shooting event, of his belief that he was going to be murdered, because that's a ruse or ploy to make others think that the insurance policy was for a real death that he expected at any time. If the TP team has been bucking to receive insurance money, or has already received it, that alone can explain why Charlie can't come out of hiding.

On Baron's Sunday show, he convinces me pretty much that the private Turning-Point plane out of Scottsdale (Erika Kirk's home) flies someone to Provo (Utah) in the morning, and then goes immediately to pick up Andrew Colvett, in California, taking off from there at 12:37 pm, just 14 minutes after the shot rang out. It flies him to Scottsdale. It's logical that the plan was to pick him up AFTER the shot rang out because, I reckon, the flight would have been called off had the shot not rang out, had the fakery not gone forward as planned.

To me that looks like the plan was to fly Charlie back to Scottsdale to meet with Andrew there, to discuss the faked shooting. Baron thinks that Andrew flew to Provo in a second plane, taking off from Scottsdale about an hour after he arrived there from California, which doesn't make much sense because, if the plan was to fly him to Provo, he would have been taken there to start with, direct from California. It could make sense if he and Erika were having an affair such that they wanted to fly together to Provo. Andrew said that he fell into her arms upon meeting her at the Provo airport, but maybe they flew there together.

In my opinion, a second plane from Scottsdale to Provo, taking off at 2:31, was needed either to fly Erika to see Charlie, or to fake her flight there if she had arrived earlier that day on the first plane, for the plan was, logically, to have her be visiting her mother at the time of the fakery because it spared her from acting (literally) hysterical at the shooting of her husband i.e. it was best for her not to be at the event.

I don't know whether there's evidence that Andrew was in Utah that day; he claimed to fly there in the afternoon, but was he telling the truth? Baron thinks Andrew was lying about finding Erika at the Provo airport when he arrived there. It makes sense is that Andrew was waiting at Scottsdale to discuss the fakery once some of the team arrived there with Charlie. Like maybe they wanted to pop open some champagne to celebrate the hoax. For some reason, Mikey and Rob McCoy were flown to Salt Lake City for the evening.

The problem with flying Andrew to Scottsdale, just minutes after the shot rang out, is if anyone discovered it. The question then arises as to why he would fly to Erica's home city instead of to Provo to be with the rest of the team? That question gets even better since everyone would expect that Erika herself would be leaving Scottsdale for Provo, soon after the shot rang out. It could be that Andrew flew to Erika's place to remain there, hoping nobody would discover the flight. At the time, the team was maybe unable to predict a slew of private investigators, all over the country, seeking to track their every move in great suspicion.

The mystery deepens as per a third plane taking off from Provo at 3:12 pm, and flying to Santa Barbara, home of this same Andrew. Who could have been on this flight? This same plane had taken off from Scottsdale at 1:27 pm, about an hour after the shot, to land in Provo at 2:29. Surely, Baron doesn't think that Andrew left Provo 40 minutes after arriving. This plane provides a second option for a plane carrying Erika to Provo, or her faking the flight if she had arrived early in the morning before the fakery took place.

It doesn't seem like a wise move to have her in Utah before and during the fakery. I don't see why she was needed there for the fakery, but Baron thinks exactly this: that she arrived at 10:06 am on the first plane that immediately afterward (take-off at 10:34) picked Andrew up (assumed) in Santa Barbara for his trip to Scottsdale. How does that make any sense, for Andrew to go to Scottsdale when Erika wasn't there? Maybe he was to go there to prepare the party whistles and the champagne. Somebody on the team had to do it discretely. They couldn't possibly have conducted such a grand hoax with no celebrations, if successful.

A second plane from Scottsdale, after landing in Provo at 2:29, takes off at 3:12 for Santa Barbara, which could look like somebody on the TP team was pre-planned to discuss the hoax with Andrew after he gets home from Scottsdale.

Baron makes a good argument as to why he thinks Erika is on the flight landing in Provo at 10:06, because an Egyptian military plane sitting at the same airport turns its transponder on at 10:05, as if MAYBE wanting to be "seen" by this in-coming flight. Candace thinks that the Egyptian planes are following Erika around, and, if correct, Erika needs to communicate with the crew of those military planes. Therefore, there could be a good reason, after all, as to why Erika is coming in early, before the shooting.

However, why was the transponder turned on at 10:05 and left on until 11:35? What would be the reasoning? "Airplane transponders are not needed for voice radio communications, but they are critical for digital identification, collision avoidance (TCAS), and mandatory for flying in controlled airspace." The plane was sitting on the airport pavement, with no need for the transponder unless the crew wanted to be identified until 11:35. Why? I suggest that this plane was trying to identify other planes, for a transponder needs to be on for that purpose too. Other TP and/or military people may have been flying in to Provo until about 11:30 that Baron doesn't have listed on his Sunday show.

This same plane turned the transponder on for only a minute, just four minutes before Andrew was landing in Scottsdale, and then turned on again for a minute at 2:29, in the same minute that the third plane above was landing in Provo from Scottsdale. Baron makes the good point that this plane was monitoring flights from the Turning-Point team, and I'd suggest that the military crew was simply assuring that things were going roughly to plan i.e. at the proper times roughly. It means that Erika has some splaining to do about her role with the Egyptian planes.

Two minutes after the third plane landed at Provo, a fourth plane took off from Scottsdale headed for Provo. This forth one had taken Charlie from Scottsdale to Salt Lake City earlier in the day. There was something going on at Salt Lake City, some gathering of the team there.

Hanna's have the stag head of Hahn- and Hann-connectable Trumps. A movie ("Snake Eyes") featuring the role of Charles Kirkland has the latter shot in the neck, by a Tyler character, at the same spot where Charlie Kirk was fake-shot, and on September 10, the same day of Charlie's faked death. Then, while Hanna's are first known in Wigton, Wigtons (Yorkshire with Kirks) almost have the Coat of Kirklands (BELLed falcon), first known in Cumberland with Kirk-related Carmans, and with English Falcons. French Falcons/FalCONTE's (Languedoc with Contans/Constants, Bell-loving Costs, and Tower-branch Tours) share the Carman and Kirk tower. Bells are first known in the same place as Trump-connectable Leggs.

Trump set Charlie Kirk up with wannabee actress Erika, safe to assume, and her team, I assume, chose to copy the kill scene in Snake Eyes. Baron Coleman and Candace Owens don't want to talk about this, because they are profiting in popularity from a real-murder scenario, and because they've been out on a look-at-me-so-smart limb until now, where they don't want to look unreliably dumb admitting their gigantic and very-harmful error. Harm = sin. Turning Point is guilty of covering for a fake murder, but Baron is guilty of quasi-accusing the entire team of conducting and/or covering for a murder.

Others who don't wish to do a Kirk comparison with Snake Eyes are the detestable major media who don't want to risk lose money pushing or suggesting government-operated conspiracy theories. Therefore, the Intelligence satanists can get away with staged operations, and even contribute psychological operations as by-products of the staged operations. They love to expose that they are so deeply entrenched in government, you can't do anything about it. That's why I lean on God the Avenger.

Which is more likely, that Charlie was murdered parallel with the murder in Snake Eyes, or that the murder was only faked? Why choose one versus the other?

The Kirkland Coat is essentially the one of PULESdons/POLESdon Coat, and both share the stars of Palins/Pawleys (Dorset with Pulls/Pole's/Pools) who named the Planes'/Plains/Platters. Poltons/Pultons/Pawtons (Potter / Pawter branch?), sharing the triple Kirkton stars, have the Kirkland stars in colors reversed.

Here's Baron's Sunday show (start a few minutes in to get to the flight logs):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXDql_VYXzM

NEWS

Thomas Massie was able to see some unredacted Epstein files that incriminate Trumps' DoJ for crimes that the next Democrat White House could jail Bondi and/or Blanche and/or Patel for, if they win the 2028 election. Trump is responsible for placing his people in jeopardy like this because he's forced his DoJ to cover up the Epstein crime ring, though that doesn't make Bondi guiltless. Dan Bongino, who has become an outright monster unable to see it, has now nothing to open his filthy mouth about due to this revelation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hJFI_Plp8Q

Ro Khanna revealed six of the redacted names, most sounding like foreigners, and moreover he tells that Pam Bondi is blaming the FBI for the illegal redactions, the Biden FBI I assume:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_zWBOV_bng

If Trump doesn't even bother to show dismay or anger, then he pieces himself by defacto "confessing" complicity with covering heinous crimes. It looks good on this fraudulent piece of trash. Pity those Christian podcasters who continue to serve him. Great shame. They are making wicked Democrats look good. The only good news, if democrats win the White House in 2-028, their DoJ might actually spend its time arresting and jailing criminal Republicans. There seems to be enough of them to keep them busy for four years. Jail Patel, jail Bongino, jail Trump, do the country a big favor. How dare do they campaign on things which they never intend to serve?

The whole world is dismally ashamed on the American congress, and Trump. Don't kid yourself, pro-Trumpers. You are becoming a stench fast. Bondi is putting her name through the mud from which there is no return, just for loyalty to Trump. SICK political animal.

I love this video below because I've never heard anyone tell about the history of pastoral incomes, or how the corruption started exactly with the churches under emperor Constantine. The blotch in this video comes at the end, where the speaker asks the viewer to subscribe, which leaves the viewer unsure of the motive no matter that he says it's to spread the video further. The problem with paying pastors is that it leaves the people unsure of whether they are preaching for money or for Jesus. Same problem exactly:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wNrhqYU0Bg

Shame on Jim Jordan for praising Biondi. The crime-facilitating Democrats are making strides toward re-popularity on Trump's asinine and criminal behavior. This Democrat speaker is a asinine, crime-supporting Democrat when the criminals are Democrats:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dUlIRuhUl0A

Massey versus Bondi on her agency's cover-up of co-conspirators. Bondi loses this altercation because she has shown no evidence that she's going after even on predator appearing in the files, she has exposed no one of them even for public shame, and the buck stops with Trump for allowing her to act in this way. Instead, she tries to tarnish Massie as her best hope of winning this fight, the very tactic Democrat congressmen use when they're cornered:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgiW06lZrvc

New FBI-buried story in buried teen bodies near Epstein's New-Mexican ranch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQ8YKlX13qM

If it's true that Trump called the Florida police on Epstein and Maxwell in 2006, why has he changed since then if not because he's protecting people. Why doesn't this pro-Trump media mention that part of this story? Why is Trump now denying Epstein criminality? This police report could easily be slanted / modified to some degree (by the police admission) in an attempt to get Trump out of hot water on his disturbing attitude toward the files release:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ixqInOMLDs

Bondi brought a torpedo prepared for every one expected to attack her. In this video, she refuses to tell who in her agency transferred Ghislaine to a Texas prison, meaning that she is responsible because she doesn't say she'll correct the transfer:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoZmdZyHDww

---

NEXT UPDATE

Here's all four Gospels wrapped into one story.

For Some Prophetic Proof for Jesus as the Predicted Son of God.
Also, you might like this related video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3EjmxJYHvM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efl7EpwmYUs

Pre-Tribulation Preparation for a Post-Tribulation Rapture

---