[Insert -- Much in this update was already written before the following video (sorry about the low-life's music) came out Thursday with yet another theory on who the shooter was, this time a fake-camera gun. This looks very likely the mystery partly solved because the bullet looks like it's travelling horizontal with the ground, not from three stories high:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1bQBO_puyQ

On the same day, the following video from Redacted was put out, and it disappeared while I was watching it. I then went to my history to re-load it, but it had disappeared from my history, suggested we could be on paydirt, and that youtube has agreed to wiping this story away as best it can. If Jason has indeed found three images of the same bullet, and therefore the bullet trajectory, note that the bullet comes from the same spot as the alleged camera-gun in the video above:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQe2j9ZA7YI

Unless Jason is playing a trick along with the camera-gun video to mislead the public, the fact that he found three similar dots all in a straight line, and headed to Charlie perfectly for explaining his being shot, seems like paydirt. I had seen the dot closest to Charlie in another video that didn't find the other two dots, and, in that video, it seemed to me that the shot was not coming from high up i.e. from the balcony with bush. The shot seemed to be coming from behind Charlie, and much nearer to him than the balcony.

The two videos above explain a bullet originating from the fat guy who we cannot see well, the one holding the camera alleged to be a gun. But Jason seem oblivious to the camera-gun theory, even though his bullets are coming from him. He's oblivious probably because the camera-gun theory came out on the same day as his doing the Redacted video.

I disagree with Jason where he thinks the bullet hit the shirt and rattled around inside of it, for the wound is clearly above the collar. I still haven't heard anyone explain, to my satisfaction, how the shirt behaves as it does, not only in rising a few inches, but puffing out from the body. I therefore still think that this shirt puffing is a doctored feature provided by the plotters to make us think that the bullet remained in the neck, as per the reason explained by Peak Prosperity's video.

At 21:50, we see the Turning Point member who would soon-after take down the camera, on the phone and standing inexplicably / curiously on some smooth, round rocks on the opposite side of the bridge underpass (Jason's "tunnel").

Before and after 26:00, Jason tells that the original video was 240 frames per second, but that "some deceptively presented, to us, at 20 frames per second." That to me is proof that the plotters had tampered with this video, as is typical in false-flag events i.e. we get lousy video quality by design.

Jason tells that X is trying to muffle his voice on this particular claim of his, which could reveal that Musk is keeping to a pro-Israeli stance to the point of covering for the true killers. Every action has a reaction from God, Christian or otherwise. End Thursday update]

The Turning Point team is glaringly guilty, in the first degree, of at least covering up the real killers of Charley Kirk. The reason for this accusation is that the team is the very source of the no-bullet-exit claim that seeks to frame Tyler Robinson. Then, when we add the fact to the frame job by the FBI, the only thing that makes sense is that anti-Gaza elements are behind the murder. Before he died, Charlie was criticizing that Israel was in the deep throes of re-locating Gazans out of Gaza, which was Trump's desire.

With news this week of the Israelis purchasing TikTok, we ought to realize that the Israelis have been in the business of buying news media for a lot longer than this week. Israel has Rupert Murdoch, owner of Fox news, in its pocket. Try to imagine how many high-caliber podcasters Israel has been "buying" with cash feeds, and of course we caught wind that it was trying to buy Turning Point itself, and, of course, it obviously has bought it to the point of getting the leaders to support the Robinson frame job. There's even some evidence that Turning Point conducted the killing. I've heard that it's a half-billion dollar company.

This is a very sick situation, and it's looking like Mystery Babylon to me, the end-times branch being the EU. I identified it years ago as the Rothschild bankers who came to form and control the League of Nations / United Nations. The stars on the EU logo are those also of proto-Rothschild Bauers. The EU logo has as many stars as Israel has tribes.

The Nation surname is even listed with English Nathans while German Nathans show only a shield, likely in honor of "RothSCHILD," which is said to mean, 'red shield." Mayer Bauer-Rothschild named his firs son, Nathan, and his family came to control Britain. German Nathans share the shield of Sadducee-like Saddocks.

You can click Nathans now, which loads them on another tab in order to load other surnames, to better follow the heraldic links.

German Nathans come up as Natts while the latest NATO chief is Mark Rutte. The previous NATO chief is Jens Stoltenberg, and while Stoltenbergs at houseofnames.com don't show the following, Hall of Names says they have: "On a blue shield a red heart pierced by an arrow." The Nation/Nathan Crest has an arrow piercing a heart too. Jewish Harts have the central part of the Israeli flag in other colors.

In Revelation 17, Mystery Babylon is a killer of Christians. In order to foment a civil war, the Israelis may foment aggression between left and right by staging leftist attacks against churches and church movements. Some of us may have been worried that such a program was ramped up with the killing of Charlie Kirk. If it's not a program to start a civil war, then it could be the start of harsh Christian persecution.

In my update of two weeks ago:

I've told the story many times of my date, Lorraine, coming home to her place from a walk with a married man around 10 or 11 pm while his wife waited alone on her balcony. I arrived to see her at that time. When she and he climbed the stairs to the balcony, I saw a long grass streak [STAIN] on the butt of her white pants, and I POINTed to it accusingly. It was our last day together.

I began to realize, as explained since then, that the pointing finger, matching the two pointing finger of Babe's, points to the killing of Charlie, co-founder of Turning Point. I showed why the Turning-like Turins/THURINs ought to be in the turned helmets the Arms of Rothschild. Lorraine had a babe symbol, and German Babe's come up as "Babel." See that? Is it a pointer to Mystery Babylon? German Roets, possibly proto-Rothschilds, are first known in THURINgia, and are in the colors and format of Jewish Harts.

English Babe's have two fingers pointing, as do Points/Pointers and Point-like Boyds. Bointons (share white goat in Crest with Bush's) are first known in Yorkshire with Rolls, and with Bush's who in turn share the black boar with Point-like Ponts and Ponters. Goats/Gothams are first known in Nottinghamshire with Nations/Nathans, and the latter's comPASSes can be code for the Pass'/Pascals suspect in the "passa" motto term of Bointons. "Passe" is a motto term of black-boar Rollo's. English Rolls are much in Bush colors and format. Rolls use "billets" while Billets share the BUS cinquefoil. The Busher lion could be in the Roll billets. There's accusations against Erika Kirk having some potential crime involvement with a colonel Busher III whom she reportedly thanked, and he's allegedly sex trafficker. I haven't looked into this. I met Lorraine at her BUS stop at a traffic light, at the corner of Lorne and Yonge streets (Richmond Hill, Ontario).

"Passe RICHESSE" is a motto term of Bower-like Bowyers, and Richs/Richess' named Riche in Lorraine because of Richeza of Lorraine, mother-in-law of Maria of Kiev (home of the Budini). Rich's/Richess' (Hampshire with Bottons/Budins) use bottony crosses as code for the Budini-like Bottons/Budins. Tyler Bowyer was the Turning Point Action COO, now the Turning Point CEO (takes Charlie's job), if I've heard correctly. Turning Point Action is the political arm (of Turning Point) suspect with ties to Israel which in turn is exploiting evangelical Christians / Zionists. Lorraine lived on Church street when I dated her, and KIRKners use a church while Church's (Somerset, beside Bushers) are in Bush colors and format.

Spears/SPEYERs (almost incorporate Pasi/Pascel Coat) have the Rollo and Roet boars in colors reversed, and while Rothes of the Pollocks (Renfrewshire with Spears/Speyers) is on the Spey river (Scotland), Rothschilds/Roddensteins are first known in Speyer (Germany). Pollocks share a boar in Crest with Rollo's, and a green Shield with Bowers and Bauers. Pollocks have hunting horns while Horns (Middlesex with Stains) share the Coat of Herons, the latter first known in Northumberland with Roddens/Rodhams and Lorraine's. Lorraine had a grass stain on her pants, that I pointed to. Stains married the Yarborough's, from the Varangian RUS, the ancestry also of Lorraine's. Varangian ruled the Ukrainian land of Ruthenes (beside Poland), and Ruths/Rothers/Randolphs are first known in Moray with the Rothes location of the Pollocks. Roddens/Rodhams share "Nec" in their motto with Rutherfords. Charlie was shot in the NECK. The Varangians ruling the land of Budini, suspect to the Point-like Boyds. Bude's share the bow with Bowers.

Pollocks have hunting horns while Hunts/Hunters (Shropshire with Bats) share the Bat saltire while Scottish Randolphs (Moray) have the bat. The Bat Caucasians live(d) beside the Pontus. I trace Parrs and FurNESS' (both in Lancashire) to "Pharnaces," king of the PONTus at the time that the Pharnaces-like Pharisees popped up in history, and the Parr Coat is on the Israeli flag along with a different-colors versions of the Jewish Hart Coat. German Roets show a sleeping lunar crescent in Reuter colors and format while Sleeps have the NESS/Nice Coat (almost the Parr Coat) in colors reversed, and then Nysa was Pharnaces' wife (2nd century BC). Herod-Maccabees were ruling Armenia, beside the Pontus, in the first century BC.

Pharisees popped up in history from Maccabee king-priests after Jonathan Maccabee formed an alliance with the Seleucid king, Alexander Balas. Queen Nysa above was a Seleucid. The Alexander name popped up in Maccabee families soon after. For example, Glaphyra and Alexander Maccabee birthed Alexander and Tigranes V; the latter was king of Armenia.

Jewish Rothchilds/Rots (not "Rothschild), Rutlands, Reuters, Rush's and Rasmussens share the horse while Rutland-beloved Horse's are first known in Northumberland with Roddens. English Rothes' (Kent with Sleeps) were once said to be first known in Shropshire with Sleeps (named Sleap in Shropshire) and Rudes' while Rudesheim is at ASSMANNshausen. Rasmussens/Assmans take us to Anders Rasmussen, the NATO chief immediately before Stoltenberg. Ras' are listed with Scottish Rose's in the roses of Rothchilds/Rots. The latter almost have the Jewish Hart Coat. Rutte's use bells while Bell-branch Bellamys are first known in Shropshire. Bellamys lived at Perche while a "perch" is with English Botters/Buddys.

Houseofnames is wrong to say that Sleeps are first known in Kent. Google AI: "The place name Sleap in Shropshire dates back to at least the Anglo-Saxon era, appearing in the 1086 Domesday Book as the family name 'Coc de Slepe' in the 'Hundred Rolls of Shropshire'" Sleeps have two fesses in the colors of the one fesse of Rush's/Rish's and Ricks. The latter trace to Croatia's Rijeka, and the Arms of Croatia share the checks of English Cocks suspect with Coc de Slepe. Cocks share the red rooster with Babel-connectable Babcocks.

As Cocks share the Bag Coat, I can begin to see why my sleeping-bag dream had a ROAD while pointing to Rhodes / Clinton elements. In the 3rd update of last month, I showed why the circling of the sleeping bag, as well as the stage in the same dream, can point to Charlie Kirk's murder.

I pointed at her pant stain when Lorraine climbed to the top of the balcony with a married man, and so I reckoned the stain was evidence that he and she were committing adultery. In Revelation 17, Mystery BABYLon is an adulteress before God. This is making sense with the Babe's/Babels, but there are also the Babels/Babwells, once said to be first known in Middlesex, where Stains are now said to be first known (previously in Yorkshire).

As Lorraine had pointed to Bush liners in at least two ways, even a third where Bushers are first known in Dorset, where Babe's were once said to be first known, I conjectured that she had gotten behind a bush on a freshly-mowed lawn when getting the lawn stain. This can indicate that the bullet came from the rooftop having a bush, for that roof top has been shown to be a balcony. English Lawns share the Bointon lion, shared also with Irish Harts and BRUNswicks, and then English Bruns are first known in Middlesex with Stains. Brunswick is only 50 miles from Hartz. The motto of Irish Harts can be suspect partly with Tiss'/Teece (Hampshire with Botters/Buddys) while Tease's are first known in Nottinghamshire with heart-using Nathans.

The balcony-like Balcons played into her pant stain, on her BUTT, because I can link the Balcon Coat solidly to Italian Botters/Botti's. Balcons share the bend-with-roses of Rothchilds/Rots.

I've seen the view from down where Charlie was shot up to that balcony three stories higher. One can only see the top of the door due to the roof line blocking it. That's the door by which people access the balcony. The shooter could have come out low from that door, made his way to the edge of the roof, and fired with a pistol furnished with silencer. If with a silencer, he was likely wearing an ear piece with someone saying something like, "three, two, one, now," so that both he and the one who shot a rifle were shooting at the same instant. It would have been a military-grade pistol with laser light, otherwise he would probably have missed.

It would be difficult to do speech-war against something so powerful as Rothschilds and their many allies in the corporate world, especially if they have no qualms in killing the opposition, and scaring the others by doing so. But God has promised the anti-Christ against Israel, and so it could be that Christians could come to appreciate the invasion of Israel by the anti-Christ if it eases persecution from Mystery Babylon. It stands to reason that he'll attack Rothschilds too when he invades Israel, especially if he comes to control the EU, an expectation from Daniel 11 and Revelation 17. The latter claims that the anti-Christ will have Mystery Babylon riding on his back in an insincere alliance where he hates her all along. Mark Rutte, the current NATO chief, is a WEF villain.

Even the video with a Turning-Point member taking down the camera behind Charlie's head has had some footage removed. At 4:13, the man seen beside the tent, with nobody in the tent, is suddenly not beside the tent at 4:14, and the man who will soon take the camera down appears in the tent, at 4:14. These two men are talking to each other at 4:04. There must have been something wrong or telling about that missing piece of video (at 4:13-14), perhaps spotting an accomplice whom I suspect as the man in white shirt appearing in the dark at the extreme left of the underpass at 4:05. It looks like he comes from a car parked beyond him in the sun:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=foGN6_CtvZs

After the camera is down, and its computer card removed at about 5:00, the man hands the card, apparently, to Mr. White Shirt then seen with white shoes, standing under the bridge (in the underpass). I assume that cars are parked on the other side of that bridge so that the computer card can be driven away. Mr. White Shirt, looking about 35-40 hears old, looks like he's collaborating with the man who took down the camera, just standing and waiting, and once the card is off the camera, Mr. White Shirt slips out of camera view to receive the card secretly, I assume. At about 5:19, another piece of the video goes missing, and when the recording resumes (5:20), a man is seen walking away under the bridge, looking like he's wearing a white shirt.

The balcony with bush is shown at 5:28, but at an angle too sharp to see the top of the door out to the balcony. The top of the door can be seen at 3:55.

Early this week, Trump announced a Western "Board of Peace" for Gaza. This comes as Israel is poised to take Gaza on its own, without American help. The Board of Peace, Trump says, will have himself as the CEO (my term), and Tony Blair as a key player. One can imagine Rothschilds behind this push to make Ga$A profits.

Don't we think that Netanyahu's backers will find it offensive that Trump is worming his way into Gaza with the Brits and others? Not right now, for Netanyahu is very happy that Trump has promised to invade Gaza with American military in a few days, just as soon as Hamas refuses his peace deal. Once the West has a foothold in Gaza, it will dictate how Israel must behave while the West take$ advantage.

The Israel side has the problem of the left because it, traditionally pro-American-Jew, has developed in opposition to Netanyahu, and even threatens the lives of Rothschilds and company within the United States...which is why Israel badly wants to control the "free speech" narrative.

Lorraine turned out to be a Russellite, jibing with the trace of the Lorraine surname to MARIA of the Varangian RUS. Charles Taze Russell, buried in a tomb with a pyramid (can't recall the detail), founded the Russellites, and was a Zionist along with the Rothschilds prior to WW1. The "sara" motto term of Russells is suspect with Sauers (Austria with Bauers) because they share the Russell / Rossi lion, in colors reversed from the MARY and Ross lions.

Maria of Kiev was the sister of king YARoslav while Stains had married YARbourough's, partially explaining why God set Lorraine up with a grass stain, on her pants. English Grasse's share the lion of Breads/Bradds and pant-like Panters while Bradys share the finger pointing at the sun with Babe's, the latter tracing with Babels/Babwells to PodeBRADY, home of the wife of George of Hungary, son of king Andrew I who had been in exile in Kiev, explaining why Andrew married a Varangian Rus. The Ross clan is known to derive from an Andrew character. English George's are first known in Dorset with Russells, where Babe's were once said to be first known.

In the last two updates, I talked about a crow that flew over my cantaloupe plants growing out of a pile of rotting weeds now turned to soil. I said that the crow flew over while half the leaves were rotted, and then said that Rothes'/Rothchilds/Rots use a giant raven, a crow species. Today, as I write on Tuesday of this week, I pulled up all the plants from that pile, and put the remaining cantaloupes into cool storage. A couple of hours later, I looked out my front door, before starting this paragraph, to see the bare weed MOUND. Mounds are first known in Peebles with Bowers who not only share a green Shield with German Bauers/Bowers, but share five, bunched arrows (different colors) with the Arms of Rothschild.

I now realize that the two legs I saw kicking the crow / raven at the stove burner (see 3rd update last month) can be God's representation of the two Roman legs on the globalist statue in the second chapter of the Biblical book of Daniel. The ten toes on the statue's feet can be for the ten crowns (rulers) on the seven heads of the beast of Revelation 13, a beast that's also in Revelation 17 with Mystery Babylon. The toe-like Tows/Touch's have two fingers POINTing, and while Stove's/Stave's are listed with STEPHensons, Stepps are also StepTOE's. That's very interesting.

Th Ade's suspect in the Scottish Bower Coat are in the colors of rotten-like Roddens, both using a bend in the colors of the lone arrow of Rothschilds/Roddensteins. The Aid variation is in the Levi motto. Compare those bends with Jewish Rots/Roiters/Rothchilds, then compare the latter's Coat with balcony-like Balcons, and with Jewish Harts suspect in the Nation/Nathan heart.

The slew of podcasters attacking Candace Owens with preoccupation can be explained by the story below in which Israel has been discovered paying podcasters several thousand dollars PER POST, not to give a light-hearted attack against all "anti-Israel" opponents, but very hard ones:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JB4Sv7zz5U

The word, "influencers," in describing podcasters is a slur, as if to say, "not newspeople," but "brainwashers." "Influencer" should be used predominantly against leftist podcasters and major media because, in their case, it's 99-percent correct. Conservative podcasters are becoming clownish, not good for winning elections. MAGAites use plenty of sewer (and unprofessional) language as if its manly or normal, who want to portray themselves as talking to, and attracting, fellow low-lives, and to hell with everyone else.

Kirk Updates

On Monday of this week, a court hearing revealed that the prosecution team is scheduled to give up, to the defence team, state evidence against Robinson, as part of the so-called discovery process. One would think that it's defense's responsibility to publicize the full camera view of the roof get-away of the man in black, which shows whether he did or did not take the shot. That full view was denied to the public by the prosecution.

Redacted had a person on who claims first-hand evidence that the prosecution has chosen the defense team, which is illegal. That's a kangaroo defense team, chosen to dance with the prosecution to jail a man who did not shoot Charlie. If the defense team does not release the rooftop video in its entirety, assume a kangaroo team. Has anyone noticed that Trump cares for Charlie about as little as Turning Point?

Go to 5:00 to see this week's blast from Candace Owens:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPaaJmCvWlQ&t=146s

Below is Phil Lyman looking honest to me as he fights against quasi-accusations from Candace Owens. If I have his story straight, Phil parked his car at a property owned by his mother, though she was not living there. It turned out that this home was one of the two side-by-side properties, both with security cameras showing the limping shooter, and Phil's car thus made it to the news. Phil also says that he heard a rifle shot sounding like a blank from behind him while he was on the second floor of the building where Peak Prosperity thinks the shooter may have been.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SCNxIrE9L0

I don't blame anyone being suspicious about Phil's involvement with the crime, for obvious reasons. What would strike me as very bad is if the FBI has not contacted him. Nino, the owner of the video above, didn't ask him whether the FBI contacted him. On Candace's behalf, she's investigating what the FBI should be, but probably isn't. On Phil's behalf, one can argue that he wouldn't leave his car in a driveway if he knows the security camera there would catch "Robinson" walking by en-route to the staged shooting. Phil ran for governor of Utah against governor Cox, and Cox seems to be guilty in the cover-up of this crime, and in the framing of Robinson.

An interesting video description this week" Former Canadian politician and historian Conrad Black was in the Oval Office with Donald Trump when the news of Charlie Kirk’s assassination broke." Conrad was owner of the Jerusalem Post. A lot of people are wondering whether Trump knows that Israel had Charlie killed. Trump was in the very thick of seizing Gaza when Charlie was killed. He has made himself the leader of the Gaza re-building program, and has Netanyahu's verbal support, I assume, by insisting upon it in return for his military support in a Gaza invasion that could start as early as this week-end. The investors must be getting extremely itchy to get it started, we may assume.

There are many podcasters attacking Candace Owens with a gnat swatter while ignoring the 800-pound camel she's bringing to the room. There are some insisting on her giving the email evidence for some of her claims, but, in her defense, she may not have permission to share those emails for obvious reason. Therefore, the podcasters have no reason to doubt her claims as "lies," which is the favorite word being used against her. Let her speak, and let's see where it all ends up. LET HER SPEAK and shut-up already about declaring Israel innocent for the time being. MANY of those who side against her should be suspect as being paid by the Israel side.

The gnat swatters refuse to distinguish between anti-Israelis and anti-Gaza-abuse. If Candace was anti-Israeli, she would never have joined Ben Shapiro. Plus, the anti-Gaza movement also has suspicions that Israel controls half of congress, in various issues, such as to steal the sovereignty of the people. Until now, there have been conspiracy theories against the Rothschilds and their corporate allies, but, suddenly, there is now a grass-roots opposition growing toward them. The more that the "Israeli lobby" fights back, the more it will net hatred toward itself. In other words, expect a backfire to plague the gnat swatters. I approve this message because Rothschilians have stolen the wealth of the nation, and because they are beneficiaries of a government-sanctioned, money-printing press. GANGSTERS. There is a possibility that God will support the movement against the ultra-wealthy as part of his exposure of Babylon the Great whore, which in Revelation 18 is portrayed as world trade. Rothschilianism and Netanyahu have nothing to do with the promise of God to Abraham.

Paramount Tactical has a video, "The Real Reason Charlie Kirk Was Killed." Nothing said about the possibility that Israel could have done it. He put the blame on left versus right, which is the FBI narrative, and the trick of the real killers. Shame Paramount.

I trust Kim Iverson, in case you want her view of Charlie' letter to Netanyahu. Max Blumenthal says the letter is not dated, but thinks it's dated in May of this year. This letter needs to be put beside what Charlie said to Megyn Kelly near his killer:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkVae41ffeM

Tucker Carlson seems no longer reliable because he says he believes the FBI when saying that Robinson confessed to the crime. He said this after Candace Owens came out to say that she spoke to Robinson's parents who told her that the FBI demanded they not say anything about the shooter. The parents did not say that the son confessed. Tucker is possibly taking a position that is best for political ambitions, staying on good terms with the Trump administration in this case, but this is heinous in this case.

So, although Candace has come out to reveal that the FBI was hiding the woman who was with Robinson when he was changing clothes, and who is therefore suspect as an accomplice of the killers (Robinson's bosses), those who have tarred her are NOT saying anything, not giving Candace credit, even though this story can lead a path to the real killers. It means that those attacking Candace care ZERO for Charlie. Half of them could be receiving payoffs from the killers to attack Candace while she seeks the real killers. SICK. And many are pro-Trumpers. Trump has said nothing, same as how he deals with the Epstein-Israeli scandals.

In the 4th minute of this video, Erika says, prior to Charlie's death, that she met Charlie in an Israeli airport while she was with her mother. Yet, shortly after 1:00 of the video below, Charlie says he met Erika at the Turning Point office. I don't recommend you watch much after the three-minute mark, because Fuentes is a sewer-mouth low-life in a suit, and not usually worth listening to:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VnCNbRK5ezk

I think the two videos above verify that Erika and Charlie have been lying to the world, and so it is possible that he got caught up in military/CIA projects with Erika's family. It's possible they were not even married, just faking it for some agreed-upon time period. If they weren't married, then it's a good chance that he was sleeping with Candace. "Good chance" doesn't mean "it's true." I've never been a Fuentes fan.

Kash Patel is perhaps playing a trick to Trumpers by announcing that he's kicking the pro-Israel ADL out of the FBI. The timing is suspect because he's being tarnished by pro-Trumpers as sucking-up to Israel on the Kirk murder. Musk is saying that the Southern Poverty Law Center (supports Blacks) is to blame for the murder. The problem is, the Turning Point team, which looks very complicit in this murder, opposes the SPLC (leftist) as a mortal enemy, but supports the ADL and other advance-Israel groups.

Megyn Kelly revealed, on her Saturday show, that she's betraying Charlie. First of all, she's ignoring what a woman said on Redacted, that when she talked to the prosecution team for Tyler Robinson, the person said that the prosecution will choose the defence team, which is for the purpose of setting up a FAKE trial. Secondly, Megyn is taking the position that the defence team has good evidence that Robinson is guilty, including the bullet that came out of Robinson's Mauser (I have never heard that from anyone, not even the FBI). She also said that the FBI has the text exchanges which many think have been faked by the plotters and/or the FBI. You can hear these claims from her by 3:30 while she has a couple of donkeys on who are ignoring all the problems in the Robinson accusations. Therefore, she's betraying Charlie, and only she knows what her motives are:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoF_KM5zufI

In the comments section of the video above: "Came here for the comments ONLY...they did not disappoint. Makes me proud we are not as stupid as they think we are AND we are all on the same page. Literally no one believes the blues clues trash the FBI is spoon feeding us." Apparently, Megyn Kelly has become a Foxite on this matter, not wanting to address an alternative-killer theory for fear of something.

Do you remember on the opening days of the shooting, how Utah police and the FBI pretended they wanted the public to know everything... but was staged only for setting a narrative in framing the wrong man. As soon as the public started to ask good questions, police and FBI became insolent, not answering the questions. Kash has become insolent, and Fox has been purely a wicked accomplice of the frame job. It's truly incredible that this sort of disappointing thing still goes on under a Republican administration. Trump has addressed NOT ONE of the public's questions, which can explain Megyn's wrong attitude.

The truth is, Trump has been the problem on both Epstein and Kirk, and Trump loves the fact that the Kirk killing saved him from media questions of what his FBI role was with Epstein, when Mike Johnson spilled the beans on that role.

There is an on-going "Charlie Kirk" youtube channel, but nobody has taken a clip from that show to reveal that the questions people have are being addressed by Turning Point. It, too, is clearly betraying Charlie with insolence disguised as a dove.

By the weekend, the plotters must have gotten to youtube to tone down the Kirk videos. Even if I ask youtube for "charlie kirk shooting," it gives me mainly weeks-old videos. I think the plotters are begging youtube not to do stories on the camera-gun theory backstage. I fully expect several others to share that story, but have seen not one.

Watch Eric Trump deflect when asked his opinion on whether Robinson is the shooter, and watch him deflect to Patel and Bongino, as if to say we can trust what they think, yet Eric probably knows already that Patel and Bongino are going full-steam ahead against Robinson. Eric says not one breath to indicate that he thinks Robinson is a frame job. I'm going to say again: Donald Trump is gangster trash whose political job is to give token nothing-burgers to his base to keep them onside for future elections. Expect Patel to give a string of nothing-burger tokens to get back his reputation after losing much reputational ground on this Kirk murder:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6WB2Mjxciw

Orbital Fall Speed Versus Lateral Speed

I have made a fantastic discovery revealing the true relative distances of the planets, in exact proportion to their speed. Where a planet is twice as close to the sun, it travels twice as fast. Therefore, I think I can find the speed of Apophis from these clues: "The orbital period of asteroid 99942 Apophis is approximately 0.886 years, or about 323.6 days, to complete one orbit around the Sun."

A few weeks ago, I worked out a law for finding the true astronomical units (AU) of planets or asteroids. That law was based on sound reasoning. The law is as simple as: the square root of the orbital period. For Apophis, it's the square root of 323.6 days = .942 AU. See how appropriate that .942 number is? As Apophis orbits faster than Earth, it is therefore discovered that it's closer to the sun, on average, than Earth.

Beware google's AI. When asking google, "average speed of Apophis asteroid," it first says, "The asteroid 99942 Apophis has an average orbital speed of about 30.73 kilometers per second (km/s)." But when asking "average speed of Apophis asteroid mph," it suddenly turns into a drunken wonder with the response, "Asteroid Apophis's speed varies, but it has an average orbital speed of about 17 kilometers per second, which translates to approximately 38,000 mph (30 km/s or ~67,000 mph is also cited as a general speed,..." Google AI the twister, to pollute education with false facts for the next generation.

The average speed of Earth orbit is slower than the 30.73 k/s given above: "The average speed of Earth's orbit around the Sun is approximately 29.8 kilometers per second (18.5 miles per second), or about 107,208 kilometers per hour (66,616 miles per hour)." Any planet closer to the sun is also faster in its orbital speed. Ditto with asteroids. It doesn't matter what mass the rocks or planets have, it doesn't change the orbital speed.

That is, if Apophis and Earth had the same average distance from the sun, they would also have the same average speed. Why doesn't astronomy tell us this? Because, it's stacked with liars who, when they come upon a truth that denies their claims, pass the lie off instead of the truth.

Asking google for the "average distance of Apophis from the sun," it responds with: "The average distance of asteroid Apophis from the Sun is 0.9224 astronomical units (AU)." That's probably wrong because my law got .942, and that law is solid: orbital speed is proportional to distance from solar gravity.

Once I find that Apophis' AU is .942, everything else falls into place like so:

Apophis period 323.6 days; 323.6/365 = .886 of Earth
My proposed law: ².886, which gives .942 AU for Apophis
Earth Speed expected: .942 of Apophis, or 1/.942 = 1.06 slower
Gravity force for Apophis: 1/.942 = 1.06 times more than Earth
Sun-Earth distance versus Apophis: 1 / .942 = 1.06 times further
Gravity force for Earth: 1/1.06 = .94 that of Apophis
Earth travels one Apophis orbit in 323.6 / .942 = 343.5 days.
Earth orbit 1.06 times longer and wider
Earth speed: 343.5/323.6 = 1.06 slower, or 323.6/343.5 = .942 of Apophis

According to the inverse-square law of gravity force, the .942 AU of Apophis would get: (1 / .942)² = 1.127 times the earth gravity, instead of my 1.06. I offer that just so you have the math method one way or th other. My math is only 1 / .942 = 1.06, no squaring the latter to get 1.127.

The orbital speeds given above for Earth and Apophis are inaccurate because they are based on a sun 93 million miles from Earth. However, the two speeds are relatively correct. That is, where the speed of Apophis is said to be 30.73 k/s versus 29.8 k/s for Earth, we find the relative speed as 30.73 / 29.8 = 1.03 times faster for Apophis. However, my law's formula above got 1.06 times.

As Earth is in reality more like 18 million miles from the sun, it's orbital speed will be much less than the 29.8 k/s (18.5 m/s) claimed by astronomy. Ditto for the speed of Apophis. As the latter could hit the earth in 2029, knowing its true speed is important. Unfortunately, NASA's incorrect data on lunar eclipses doesn't allow us to find the exact AU for Earth, and so all I can do is use 18 million, which then finds the AU for Apophis as 18 x .942 = 16.96 million miles, make it an even 17. The orbital distance then becomes 107 million miles.

To find the speed of Apophis: 107,000,000 / 323.6 days = 330,655 miles per day. To find the speed in mph: 330,655 / 24 = 13,780 mph. I cannot imagine anything passing by me, even a mile away, at that speed. I doubt one could see it go by. But, it's more than 5 times less destructive than at 70,000 mph.

Plus, when astronomers try to size Apophis up, while thinking it's 5.2 times further than it really is, they will "discover" it to be 5.2 times larger than it really is. Therefore, if it's 5.2 times slower and 5.2 times smaller, it's impact force will be 5.2 x 5.2 = 27 times less than the going claim. That's a big deal. If it hits the sea, the tsunami, and the planet shaking, won't be anywhere near as large as is feared.

The fact that my law got almost exactly the AU and the relative orbital speed of Apophis verifies the law as the means to discovering both. I used that law to find the AU of the planets, totally at odds with the established AU's as discovered by Kepler's 3rd law.

Apophis teaches us that, regardless of a rock's total mass, and regardless of its specific density, planets or rocks at the same distance from the sun will have the same orbital velocity. This can mean only one thing: orbital velocity is based only on the specific force of gravity acting AT the rock. Not UPON the rock, but AT the rock. A larger rock such as Earth gets more gravity pull than Apophis, but both are at the same general region where gravity force is roughly identical. The Earth has more atoms to pull, but that does NOT require a much-faster orbital speed. Contrary to our thinking by logic, the massive earth does not need to orbit faster to maintain perfect orbit just because it's far heavier than Apophis.

I can tell you why both rocks require the same orbital speed: because both rocks fall to gravity at the same speed while in orbit. Every orbiting object is falling to solar gravity even as it simultaneously moves away from the sun at 90 degrees to it, or laterally from it. I can tell you for a fact that a perfect orbit requires more units of lateral distance per unit of fall toward the sun. If the lateral miles were equal to the fall miles, the planet would travel at 45 degrees as compared to the 90-degree lateral direction. But as a circular path is only slightly less than 90 degrees, the lateral travel is far more than the fall travel.

It doesn't matter how heavy the rock is, all rocks, at the same distance from the sun, travel the same number of units laterally from the sun's core, per 1.0 unit toward the sun's core. Then, because the fall is identical in speed for all rocks at any one distance from the sun, the lateral speed must be the same for all rocks at that same solar distance. A rock twice as far from the sun will have both a lateral speed of half as much, and fall speed of half as much. It means that astronomy is wrong when saying that gravity is four times weaker with twice the distance.

Apparently, my law is not new, but it's not generally known. It should have become a central understanding even for basic astronomy students. A science teacher at Quora says: "The speed of an orbiting body is inversely proportional to its orbital radius; in other words, asteroids that are closer to the Sun orbit faster than asteroids farther out." That's my law exactly: a planet half as close to the sun orbits twice as fast, regardless of planetary weight. The statement above implies: regardless of the asteroid's weight / mass / density. The teacher doesn't say, "inversely proportional to the square." Therefore, astronomy is keeping secrets from us, and lying when saying that gravity is inversely proportional to the square.

The only explanation, unless you fall for the trash of modern astronomy, is that all atoms weigh the same when at the same distance from a gravity source. It doesn't matter how many atoms in a rock, gravity pulls each one separately such that they all fall to gravity at the same speed of acceleration.

If we ask why planets don't accelerate as they fall to the sun, I think I've just realized the reason: the lateral direction fully offsets the fall so that speed-upon-speed -- acceleration -- cannot take place. The lateral direction forbids the acceleration of the fall. Acceleration is speed x speed, but the lateral travel (quasi-upward) turns it into speed x 1 (speed remains the same).

To understand this, we imagine the planet falling a minute distance to the sun while the lateral travel fully counters the fall such that there is no real fall. There is a real fall, but there isn't. When the lateral travel is just-so faster than the real fall, the planet travels in a circle around the sun such that it never gets closer. So, it really does fall, but never gets closer.

For the time being, I assume that the lateral speed is exactly the orbital speed, meaning that the fall toward the sun doesn't slow the lateral speed so that the resulting orbital speed is slower than the lateral speed would be if there were no simultaneous fall.

If the lateral speed were faster for one rock than the other, when both are at the same solar distance, the fall for the one would need to be faster by the same proportion, or the circular orbit would be spoiled. If we claim that the heavier rocks should fall faster, then they would also need to orbit faster to keep the circular shape of the orbit, yet tiny asteroids (as compared to planet sizes) wildly debunk that claim. The only possible reality, due to there not being an third alternative, is that solar gravity pulls both asteroids and planets with the same force when they are at the same distance from the sun, because all atoms weigh the same.

Some will say that there is a third alternative, one that I fell for until the all-atoms-weigh-the-same argument was realized. One can say that, the heavier the planet, the harder it needs to be sent laterally to keep a perfect orbit. Thus, the extra lateral force needs a stronger gravity pull to maintain orbital balance. Earth got the really-strong lateral push, and also gets the really-strong gravity pull, but Apophis got a light lateral push while having a weak gravity-pull force. Thus, they ended up orbiting at (roughly) the same speed.

The reason I reject that third option is that there are thousands of asteroids orbiting at the same solar distance that come in different sizes and masses. If every asteroid had to have its own, peculiar push force to get it into perfect orbit, it strains credibility. It's easier to conclude that, no matter the size, they all orbit at the same speed because all have atoms weighing exactly the same. Gravity is an electromagnetic force arranging electromagnetic atoms to be pulled by the same force (i.e. weigh the same) when at the same distance from gravity. The closer to gravity, the more atoms loose captured electrons, the more gravity (negative charge) attracts the atoms.

Big bangers naturally claim that the proto-sun let out gases that circled the sun slower with distance from the sun, which gases formed the planets. They would naturally claim that gases between the orbital paths of planets either circled too fast or too slow to form perfect orbits, and thus those gases either spiralled away or into the sun. Yet the fact that all of the water and oxygen in the clouds ended up on earth makes big bangers looks like desperadoes, explaining why they take or create every desperate opportunity to claim that other planets have water and oxygen. The one thing that the solar system tells astronomy is that it did not evolve naturally without a God, but the fact that this is the teaching to this day only serves to show that evolutionists stole astronomy to themselves.

Is there are logic is claiming that solar gases out in the region of the outer planets circled the sun slower than the gases that formed the inner planets? It doesn't matter, because gases spread out, meaning that planets could not be formed by orbiting gas atoms. The imposters draw pictures of gases forming proto-planetary blobs, but this is impossible, because gases spread out.

If they argue that gases came forth mildly from the sun, we expect those gases to spread out. This means that atoms would move further apart, not blob together. If they argue that gases came forth violently from the sun, gas atoms would not form perfect orbits. Big bangers need gases in perfect orbits for billions of years during which time the atoms come together into proto-planetary blobs. But that's the killer, the billions of years. Gas atoms do not remain near each other, but spread out immediately. What gives the big-bang imposters the science justification to argue that the gases remained thick near the sun for billions of years? A good scientist would not argue that way.

We can't argue that the gases became trapped in orbits for billions of years because gases that spread out from the sun, starting near the sun but eventually venturing out to the regions of the outer planets, are not going to keep / form perfect orbits. As gases continue to spew from the sun, they push previously-spewed gases further away from the sun, which is expected to ruin any orbits of gas atoms that may have formed. If you push the moon away from the earth continually, it'll spiral out of orbit. Why shouldn't the same apply to individual gas atoms?

Plus, no matter how mildly we imagine the sun spewing gas atoms, it can't be mild because the sun is a massive explosion machine. Atoms spewing out from the sun go OUTWARD, duh. Particles spewing outward at any angle, be it a small angle, are already spiralling outward enough to be incapable of forming circular orbits.

The more mildly the science imposters would like the gases to spew, the more they have the problem of explaining the cause of the ejections in the first place. Today, we see massive explosions ejecting material from the sun, but they do not create a cloud of gas filling the solar system. All the material goes back down into the sun.

Does anyone imagine that the solar explosions we see today could form orbiting gas atoms? Imagine how much harsher the explosions need to be to fill the solar system with gases remaining thick enough over billions of years to form planets. We are not talking a mild spewing of solar material. The harsher the ejections, the less likely they will form perfect orbits of ejected material. It's all in the imagination of the big-bang imposter, the goof who draws pictures of proto-planetary blobs to deceive you, not telling you that the orbiting material could never have formed in the first place.

To make the planet-formation theory more credible, big bangers imagine early stars in a disk shape that throw material out at the disk's outer edge due to disk spin. But material flung out by a spin does NOT create circular-moving material, but rather spiralling. There's a big difference. The imposters draw pictures with the ejected material circling in orbit, but spiralling material is not orbiting material, it's just that simple. Anything flung outward from the disk, by spin action, cannot end up in orbit.

Besides, the proto-sun cannot form in the first place because it needs gravity to bring lone atoms together. Gravity cannot exist before the star forms, and the star cannot exist before gravity forms, but the imposters impose their pictures of proto-suns upon you anyway, hoping you won't ask questions.

A body of matter cannot spin in two different directions; there can only be one spin direction. Yet, if it gives off gases by its spin when the sun is yet small and forming, how could it increase in size to become the full sun we have today?

Or, if one were to spread the material within the current sun such that it were turned into a gas spreading beyond the orbit of Pluto, how thin would that gas be? See the problem? I doubt very much that this gas would be thick enough to allow planets to form from a single ring of gas around the sun. On top of that problem, the gas would spread out much thinner after just one century of time.

Astronomers think the Earth is 108 solar diameters from the sun. Therefore, if we imagine the sun as a one inch ball, the Earth is 108 inches (nine feet) away. As they think that Neptune is 30 AU's from the sun, it would be 108 x 30 = 3,240 inches away, which is 270 feet. Therefore, think of how thin a gas would be if we took that one-inch solar ball, and separated it into individual atoms, spreading them over 270 feet, which does not yet go as far a Pluto (39.5 AU's away). Those solar gas atoms would not merely spread in a straight line to a Uranus pebble 270 feet away, but must also orbit the sun fully throughout the solar system. There's no way that this picture could have gas thick enough to form proto-planets.

Still worse, where the planets formed while the sun was yet a proto-sun, it was then even smaller than it is today? The drawings of the deceivers, of THICK gases and proto-planetary blobs, are cartoons to laugh at. Confess your sins if you hearkened to these atheists without respect for God.

With Neptune 270 feet away from the 1-inch sun, it's orbit would be twice that distance in diameter. Therefore, we need to spread the atoms of a one-inch ball into a disc of 540 feet round, and, for argument;s sake, let's just make the disc as thick as the sun, 1-inch thick. The area of a disc 540 feet round is 270 x 270 x 3.14 x 12 = 33 million square inches, and as we have the disk 1-inch thick, it has 33 million cubic inches of space. The 1-inch ball has about .8 cubic inch of material, wherefore we need to spread thin the sun's atoms by 33M / .8 = 41 million times. Of course, only a fraction of the total proto-sun's material could have gone out as a gas, and so 41 million times thinner is a vast under-statement. In that picture, there's no thick, cosmic gas, but rather an invisible gas. But let's go on.

For argument's sake, let's assume that all the planets have a rocky diameter of 8,000 miles, same as earth. That's 108 times smaller than the reported diameter of the sun. Therefore, each of the eight planets to Neptune are to be viewed as about 1/100ths (.01) of an inch in diameter where the sun is a 1-inch ball. Each planet therefore has a cubic size of .00008 cubic inch. We want to know how much solar material exists in one Neptune orbit where Neptune is in a gas having a volume of 41 million cubic inches.

One Neptune orbit, where it's 270 feet from the sun, is 20,350 inches long. If Neptune were a planet 1 cubic inch large, it would pass through 20,350 cubic inches of gas. But as Neptune is being viewed as .0157 cubic inch it passes through 20,350 x .00008 = 1.6 cubic inches of gas. That is, even if proto-Neptune collected every atom in its orbit, it would collect only 1.6 cubic inches of the total 41 million available throughout the solar system, if the WHOLE sun's atoms were to be spread throughout that solar system. Therefore, all the material in one full Neptune orbit amounts to 1.6 / 41,000,000 = .00000004 of all the material in a 1-inch sun. That number is 25 million times less than 1.

In this picture, we are using a gas spread evenly from sun to Neptune that is only as wide as the sun. In reality, it's going to be spread far wider than the width of the sun by the time it creeps that far out. Plus, by the time proto-Neptune fulfills one orbit, the gas will have spread out even more such that there would be still less material available, in any orbital path, by which to accumulatively form any planet's rocky core. The longer you view a planet in orbit, be it for a billion years, the thinner the gas must be at any given time. There just isn't enough material in the entire sun to produce the planetary cores by way of gas-outspreading throughout the volume of the solar system and beyond.

Plus, most of the solar material is hydrogen gas, with very little rock material by which to form the planets. You can play with this math and picture all you want, but I think I've said enough already to show that the planetary rocks could not have formed from the rock gases available in a proto-sun.

But there's more, because rock material is made of silica, which is part oxygen. How could the proto-sun have had so much silicon and oxygen? You should be able to figure out all on your lonesome that modern astronomy will report much more silicon and oxygen in the sun today than is the reality, just because they claim that the sun provided the planetary rocks. IMPOSTERS. They create "facts" to dress the big bang as reality. google is reporting as much as 1-percent oxygen in the sun, which is a sham to help make viable the evolution of Earth's oceans too, from solar material. It's to be expected that big-bang fanatics would report some oxygen in the sun, as much as they are able to get away with. If God has no use for oxygen and silicon in the sun, there will be none.

NEWS

Israel has a problem with the world sailing to Gaza:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7KqjEqJWA4

On Friday, Trump started to brag about Hamas accepting his peace deal. Trump was licking his chops because this deal makes him the king of Gaza. But even while he was licking his chops, Israel started to bomb Gaza...because it really doesn't want this peace deal, because Israel wants to be in charge of the new Gaza, not Trump and Blair together with Israel acting as the third, short leg on the rickety tripod. It's a no brainer that Israel doesn't want the peace deal if it can help it.

Very shortly (but on the same day) after the Kirk shooting, the U.S. senate put on a vote on whether the Epstein files should be publicized (the House had previously given it a green light thanks to Democrats):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHmdoSqoVR8

So far as I've heard, the Thomas Massie bill, to force Pam Bondi to release Epstein file, is still going forward with good potential for success.

With MAGAites not doing much on Epstein anymore, we need to depend on such news orgs as Breaking Point with what I think is a new story this week of Epstein-Israeli ties:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2QyrxLRx-E

Beware Britain, canada and Australia, as well as other nations under WEF shadows, in the next two years, and do speak/write out against it to throw the WEFers out of power:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvrccAbuq-0

WEFers want to limit travel, probably to make electric cars more viable where they need less battery energy. People will not only travel less when not allowed to travel far, but by being restricted to small regions, they won't need a car at all, and WEFers will tend to force them to ride bikes by making cars a highly-taxed "sin" i.e. very expensive.

Here's evidence from an Arizona Republican that Speaker Mike Johnson is still opposed to releasing the Epstein files. If true that Johnson is refusing to sign this Arizonan up to the House to delay the Massie vote, what do you think of Johnson, a Christian, for supporting the Epstein cover-up with a slew of fellow Republicans? How would God view Johnson? How much will God demand from Johnson as repayment for this attitude? At what point does God decide that certain Christians should be shut out from the kingdom of God for being disobedient, and for sitting at the table of satan?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9I-NjRM0ic

The Highwire continues its war against vaccine-autism dangers. This refers to vaccines in general, not just mRNA vaccines
https://www.bitchute.com/video/HGtzU7e1ilHn

If you can't watch the whole video above, at least see this short snippet:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/lQKZ99ngLVnf

This is weird, where pope Leo is in all seriousness blessing a fake chunk of ice before a church audience:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9nZiQHXXFA

When the atheists shed light on the on-going Nigerian slaughter of church goers. The only good news is that it's been a slow persecution where people have had time to flee the country. I don't know how well nearby countries are willing to let them in. google says that about one-quarter of Nigerian Christians are catholics, and another quarter Anglican. Wikipedia pegs Presbyterian's at about 10 percent (almost 7 million), who may be heretics if that denomination there upholds wokish "values."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8iN35ZsuMY

When you hear "Langley" in this video, it's CIA headquarters. This video enlightens Tucker Carlson on CIA writers, authoritarians, who control Wikipedia articles, a conflict-of-interest which should not be permitted. These writers insist on stating the "facts" for CIA-staged events, and they cry foul against "conspiracy theorists" in those articles, you see.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6MNbMmvyMw

---

NEXT UPDATE

Here's all four Gospels wrapped into one story.

For Some Prophetic Proof for Jesus as the Predicted Son of God.
Also, you might like this related video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3EjmxJYHvM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efl7EpwmYUs

Pre-Tribulation Preparation for a Post-Tribulation Rapture

---