November 4 - 10, 2025
Organ Transplants From Romania
or
News Section Last Section
Hall of Names is once again showing the descriptions of the Coats of Arms presented at House of Names. Click off (not on) of purple box to get started.
I'd like to show you the word-for-word translation, by Alfred Marshall, of 2 Thessalonians 2:6-7. The square brackets here are not mine, but his:
...and now the [thing] restraining ye know, for the to be revealed him in the of him time. For the mystery already operates of lawlessness; only [there is] the [one] restraining just now until out of [the] midst it comes.For the purpose of making my point, I'll put that in my own words to reflect it better for the English language without changing what's being said:
...and now the [thing] restraining you know, of his revelation in his time. For the mystery of lawlessness already operates; only [there is] the [one] restraining for now until out of [the] midst it comes.The Greek for "the [thing]" is "to," and the Greek for "the [one]" is "o". The reason that "thing" is in square brackets is because it's our word "the" in the neutral gender, while "o" is our word "the" in the masculine in order to explain why "one" is in square brackets instead of "thing" (the Greek "to" is not our English "to").
The pre-tribulationist rebels, prophecy-expert imposters, would have you believe that the removal of the mystery of lawlessness from the midst refers to the rapture of the church off of the world. DEPSERADO IMPOSTERS. Paul of course says no such thing. When He says "the [thing] restraining", one could take it to mean the Holy Spirit, for he also calls it "the [one] restraining," or "him restraining."
"The [thing]" is as acceptable as our using "THE Holy Spirit" where "the" is neither masculine or feminine. The Greek "to" means "the [neither feminine nor masculine]". My point is that the mystery of lawlessness is said to come out of the midst of the restrainer. This is what compels us to translate "the [thing]" not purely as the Holy Spirit. It's heretical in that view, for there is no evil in the Holy Spirit. The lawlessness of satan does not come out of the Holy Spirit, and for this reason we cannot interpret "the [thing]" as purely the Holy Spirit.
Instead, we need to view it as the actions of the Holy Spirit. The power of satan operates on earth, as does the Holy Spirit. The latter can check or frustrate the wicked actions of the kingdom of satan. Paul is referring to the restraining actions of the Holy Spirit, and telling us that the time will come when the Holy Spirit will allow the actions of the dark spirits to pop up successfully for the final-hour showdown. Rather than arising out of the Holy Spirit, they dark powers become successful from the midst of the restraining ACTIONS of the Holy Spirit. A no brainer.
But that view does not serve the pre-tribulationist imposter. He demands what is not found anywhere in Scripture, that the Holy Spirit is removed completely from the planet, for this gives them the opportunity to teach that the Church MUST also be taken off the planet, and thus they turn these words of Paul into a pre-tribulation rapture in the midst of his post-tribulation message. WICKED REBELLION against Paul, and against the words of Jesus too.
The very next verses (8 and 9), after saying "out of [the] midst it comes," is: "And then will be revealed the lawless one, whom the Lord will destroy by the spirit of His mouth and bring to nothing by the outshining of His presence." It's very lucky for us that Paul included the destruction of the anti-Christ, or the pre-tribbers would have argued that this outshining Return of Jesus is their fabricated pre-tribulation return.
Paul is telling Christians that, don't worry about some report that Jesus has already arrived, for he cannot until after the anti-Christ is revealed, and also after he fulfills prophecy, after the great tribulation of Israel.
If the pre-tribbers have not massacred Paul's words enough, they also teach that, it's not the power of lawlessness that pops free from the midst of the power of God's restraining, but rather the Church comes out of the midst of the world. In no way is Paul talking about something coming out of the world, but rather out of restraining actions of God.
See two updates ago as to how the end-time anti-Christ is a resurrection of one of the seven Roman emperors that Revelation portrays as the seven heads of the Revelation-17 beast. Revelation 13 in no way says that the anti-Christ will suffer a head wound, which is what too many prophecy "experts" have taught. I find them so STUPID at times, it boggles my mind. Can't they see plainly that Revelation 13 PLAINLY says: "one of his [seven] heads" is what looks fatally wounded? Do they need to be taught how to read? Why do they insist that the 8th head gets fatally wounded, or that it's foretelling the resurrection of the end-time anti-Christ? Are they STUPID? The meaning is that the 8th king somehow belongs to the seven, as Revelation 17 says. My best crack at an explanation is that God will allow a semblance of the Roman empire to apply again.
A Diversion From Normal Topics
I once read that emperor Tiberius co-ruled with Augustus from 12 to 14 AD. I accepted that claim blindly, knowing no other source for that claim. I therefore dated Tiberius' 15th year, which we find in the Gospel of Luke as the first year of Jesus' ministry, at 27 AD. I then noted, by a mild investigation of the Gospels, that Jesus' ministry was little more than two years, not three, and so I predicted his Crucifixion in 29.
I didn't, in those years, have a quick way to verify whether Tiberius co-ruled with Augustus, but, now, I've just asked google, "did Tiberius co-rule with Augustus?" The response from google's AI: Yes, Tiberius effectively co-ruled with Augustus during the last year of his reign. In A.D. 13, Tiberius was granted proconsular power that was made co-extensive with Augustus', making him a co-princeps and preparing him for sole power after Augustus's death in A.D. 14...He received proconsular power that became equal to Augustus', establishing a de facto co-rule.
Contrary to what you may believe, google's AI robot is an absolutely stupid robot, a mere ape. It merely borrows information to answer your questions, and when it has choices, it can decide one only of the choices (without telling you of the choices) to pretend that it's bang-on smart. google programs the robot to have priorities in who or what it apes for reporting back to us.
When you test AI, you find that it's at times a joke, and at times a deceiver too. For example, I tested google AI with: "on what date in 12 AD did Tiberius' co-rule begin?" The response was not that I got it wrong concerning 12 AD versus 13, but: "Tiberius' co-rule began on October 23, AD 12, the date of his acclamation as Imperator for his victories in Germany and Pannonia, which led to the consuls granting him joint governance with Augustus." Why didn't AI tell me that when I asked it the first question?
Therefore, I do think that Jesus began his ministry between October of 27 AD and October of 28.
I asked google, "what month did Jesus' ministry begin?" Contrary to many scholars, who start Tiberius' 15th year in 29, google AI responded: "Scholars estimate Jesus' ministry began in the fall of AD 27 or the spring of AD 28,..." Therefore. Most scholars" regard Tiberius' 15th year at 27 AD, yet I'll bet you've never heard that before from modern scholars. Why not?
As part of the response to the question directly above, AI gives yet another date for the start of Tiberius' co-rule:
Calculating from Tiberius: Luke 3:1 states that Jesus began his ministry in the fifteenth year of Tiberius's reign. Since Tiberius officially began his joint reign with Augustus on July 1 in AD 11, this places the start of John the Baptist's ministry in the spring of AD 26, and Jesus's baptism a bit later in the summer of AD 26 or the spring of AD 27.As you can see, AI is a schizoid joke, not consistent with who or what it chooses to ape. I therefore asked: "on what date in 11 AD did Tiberius' co-rule begin?" Response: "Tiberius' co-rule with Augustus did not formally begin in 11 AD. Historical sources place the start of his co-regency, when he was granted equal powers to Augustus, in 12 AD (specifically after his triumph on October 23, 12 AD) or 13 AD, not 11 AD."
I then requested: "dating the month for baptism of Jesus," and this time AI gave yet another year for Tiberius' 15th: "...biblical scholars and historical analysis offer potential timeframes and a strong traditional observance points to the month of January. The event likely occurred around AD 28 or 29, based on Luke's Gospel placing John the Baptist's ministry in the 15th year of the reign of Emperor Tiberius Caesar." google AI is NOT RELIABLE. google AI "knows" nothing. The mystic / superstitious vatican chose January for His baptism, a good reason to figure that it's incorrect.
The Gospel of John records three Passovers, with the first one coming "soon" (how soon?) after His baptism. Some take this to mean that Jesus' ministry was three years, but, no, that's wrong. If for example His baptism was in March, with Passover a couple of months later, the third Passover, at His Crucifixion, would be two years and two months after His baptism.
The average nightly temperatures, in January, at the area of the Jordan where Jesus was baptized are around 50 F, not a good time for Jesus to be travelling from Galilee to Jerusalem. At the latter location, on the mountains, the average January temperatures are around 40 F. In the first chapter of John, we find that, a couple of days after the Baptism, Jesus went to Galilee with some disciples. It wasn't likely in January. March makes more sense weatherwise, especially as John was baptizing many people at that time.
Charlie Kirk Updates
The Israeli side of the pro-Trump schism is losing so badly that the FBI has staged, I think, an ISIS-terror plot, meaning that Kash Patel is just like the FBI under the Democrats, but for a different reason. I'm paying no attention to this story, a distraction, because this story comes out at the same time as the revelation that 12 Israeli phones were at the Kirk-shooting event.
If you're in the fighting mood, to watch Candace get beat up by a kid, for ignoring Erika Kirk, watch this video straight to the 55th minute until you hear "Elizabeth Kirk"; you can start at about 9th or 10th minute to get past the small talk:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8E5jfBpy9USomebody at the comment's section of the video above: "Candace Owens' husband, George Farmer, is the former CEO of the tech company Parlement Technologies, and guess whom had some business going on with them? Yair Netanyahu, the son of the beloved Bibi...all info are online, on the Haaretz newspaper." Might be nothing. Haaretz is a leftist news outlet. Parlement Technologies was a part of Parler, and Haaretz criticized this week because it thought January 6 was an inside-job conspiracy. That's one good reason not to trust Haaretz. Last I heard, Haaretz wants a Palestinian state.
I've watch Candace most of the time since the faked assassination. I've wondered whether she writes her own shows. If not, who might? She could be reading her shows. I dislike her attitude; I think her opening is narcissistic. She rambles too much, possibly to increase the $$$ intake, but I shouldn't make judgment on that.
The video owner above thinks that Erika Kirk may be seeking to be the vice-president of president JD Vance for 2028, but Steve Bannon claims inside evidence that Trump's team has a plot for his running for a third term in 2028.
I suggest that Erika Kirk is "shy" in taking the position on the Robinson issue that most Americans (Republican and Democrat) take because she feels she owes Trump her popularity, and perhaps her marriage to Charlie too. Trump is the skunk on this issue, and nobody's challenging him. Why does the skunk get a pass? Why has he not told what he thinks? Has anyone insisted that this imposter give his explanations for the Robinson contradictions and impossibilities?
Candace may be seeking to be the vice-CEO of Turning Point, for it can explain why she's being so kind to Erika, and so dismal toward the other potential leaders. This week, her claims include that Mikey McCoy has been primed to become a Turning Point leader, which makes sense because he's just a kid whose only reason for being in the team's leadership is for the purposes of his father, Rob. After the "shooting," Erika gave this mere kid a glorious compliment that of course doesn't fit what he did at the shooting. It seems that Erika is doing the bidding of Rob McCoy, and so I can see why Candace would attack both Mikey and Rob if she wants to be part of a two-women leadership of TP. But I don't know whether that's the reality.
Erika always wipes the eyes, not AT the outer corner(s), but a little ways off the outer corner(s), which is a second way that you can tell she's acting. The other way is to note that there are no tears. Tear ducts are at the inner eye corners, and there needs to be a LOT of tear liquid, and watery blinking, if it's going to round the lower eyelid to the outer corner. You will see women tapping a cloth or paper wipe at the outer eye corners in government-staged productions (they can hire an NGO to do them) that hire actors for news purposes.
On Candace's Wednesday show, she addresses (start at about 31 minutes) the illogical huddle of the Turning-Point security team that attends Charlie behind a table. Both at that time in the video, and earlier, Candace is accusing this team of killing Charlie by doing nothing to salvage his life from the bullet. It seems that she's not complicit with this shooting event in some complicated, psy-op-tical capacity because, if she is, she's not expected to accuse Turning Point of planning or facilitating the murder. She continues to speak against Mikey McCoy, and makes a good phone-related point, at about 40 minutes, concerning Blake Neff's rendition of the Mikey "escape":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LATnak75Si0Mikey walking away behind the tent, at the very second of the first shot, proves he knew there was no bullet coming from Charlie's front, for if the bullet was real, and if he knew it was coming, he wouldn't have walked behind the tent in the very path of a second or third shot, in case the shooter thought these extra shots were necessary.
The Turning-Point team as a whole knew there was no bullet coming from Charlie's right side, or Frank Turek and another team player would not have been standing at Charlie's right. There was no bullet. Charlie is still alive, and the longer Candace rails against Turning Point for facilitating the murder, the harder it will be for her to change her story. Even if the family revealed where Charlie is buried, I wouldn't change my mind. I'd claim that he's not buried there.
Erika's interview this week by Jesse Watters was a farce. He asked her what she thought about the conspiracy theories, and she didn't answer. If she truly loved Charlie, and if he was truly shot dead, she would have fired the security team that did NOTHING to stop the bleeding starting from two seconds after the shot was heard. Jesse is either a farce, or she insisted before the show that he not ask specifics, but the best question he could have asked is: "what do you think about the men huddled around your husband, with none of them showing blood on their hands?" She should be extremely angry at those men, but, instead, she has said nothing to show disappointment, and said to Jesse that she trusts the team. She s liar, a fraud. She knows Charlie is alive.
Where's her disappointment for the team not having an ambulance at the event when it was required by state law / school rules? Why did the team shew away the two medical people who came to the SUV to help out, when the Turning-Point team stuffed Charlie into the back seat like a sack of potatoes? Why is Candace being so soft on Erika? Because, she too is a fraud in this respect, even as she tells her audience that she's only after the truth. No she's not. She's being soft on Erika when the latter is not acting as she's expected to.
Candace talked this week about Erika claiming to meet Charlie for the first time at an Israeli airport, which can be found on many podcasts. Yet Candace would also know of the alternative story told by Charlie and Erika both that he and she met later, in 2018, at a job interview in New York. As there is no reason to lie about where they met unless there's a deep-seated problem with one of the stories, I think we can glean that the Turning Point leaders, or those who control them from Israel, wanted the Israeli-airport story to go away. Some are saying that it wasn't only Erika's father who worked for Israel's missile-defence system, but her mother too.
We can imagine that when Erica or Charlie were asked about this contradiction, they might have tried to weld the two meetings such that they were one, as if one evolved into the other, but I'm not buying it. Such wiggling is too expected from people caught in a fabrication.
As you can see, there was a built-in lever, Erika Kirk, for the Israel government to use, from the military / Intelligence level, to curb, manipulate or drive Charlie's decisions at Turning Point. I can glean that Erika started to make the decisions before the shooting because it was decided, before the shooting, that Charlie needed to leave the organization. The best theory is that Israel had a sit-down with him to give him options on how to leave, and he chose his faked murder. We can imagine that Israeli Intelligence has a special department for false-flag events. It appears that the Turning-Point leadership was in on the murder because it was in on the faked death. The problem is, 99 percent of the popular podcasters won't take that view, not necessarily because they don't see is as a good option. If everyone came to believe in a faked murder, it wouldn't necessarily mean less money in-take for the podcasters. It would then become a wilder story, and a hunt for Charlie's whereabouts would ensue.
Erika once again had her tissue in hand when with Jesse Watters, and once again she touched and dabbed it beside her eyes, yet not once did I spot the sparkling expected, in bright studio lights, of liquid at the bottom edge of an eye. But, I didn't watch but a couple of minutes, maybe three, of her speaking.
Some are saying that Erika was a honeypot trap, by which they mean that Israel wanted her to marry Charlie, and arranged it, in order to control Turning Point. That's a lot to ask of a young woman who might want her own, real husband and children, but perhaps they paid her well. There is another option, where Israel convinced Charlie to fake a marriage with Erika, and this one rings true where even he keeps the backs of his supposed children to news cameras. The public doesn't know what they look like probably because they are not his children.
It is not a conspiracy theory that Erika and/or her mother had a Christian foundation, "Romanian Angels." It's registered as a support group for orphans, but accused, with some evidence, of supplying children for would-be pedophiles in the American military stationed in Romania's pedophile central. I would not expressly reject that conspiracy theory because it's known that child traffickers use an official, Christian-missionary facade when operating in foreign lands. I'm interested in this story. Was Erika abused as a child? Were her parents wicked?
Perhaps Israel used Romanian Angels to blackmail the military brass in Romania, with other such operations near military bases in other countries to blackmail its leaders. Israel would then help the guilty men to get higher-level jobs in the military in seeking to control it from the very top. It can explain rampant pedophiles in high political office too. I don't want to say "pedophile" as if it's a normalized sexual expression, because I would rather say that I'd like to take a sledge hammer to the head of a pedophile whom I catch in the very act. Perhaps I should re-phrase that. Make it an axe.
Trump was close to Erika years before she was with Charlie, and Trump, in those years, a stark womanizer, was close to Jeffrey Epstein.
Before the 10th minute of the video below, which tells what's known about the Romanian-Angel accusations, we find that the Romanian government was suspicious that organs were being seized from the children under the watch of Erika's family, and shipped to Israel.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5aNAFbvAp4kThe video says that Romanian accusations of trafficking were when Erika was 12 years old, and then says that while there's no evidence that Erica's Romanian Angels of later years was trafficking children, it also says that there's no evidence that the foundation was "involved in adoption" of orphans (lead-up to 13 minutes). The video owner repeats that there's no evidence for the conspiracy theory even though he reiterates the circumstantial evidence presented by others. A private investigator always values circumstantial evidence, for it justifies a deeper pry in seeking hard evidence.
As per "organ transPLANTs," I've just loaded Cork-like Organs/Horrigans, a CORRIGan/Kurrigan branch, and Organs are first known in Cork while Corks have the Tiller and Tail/Tailer lion tails. The Tiller and Tailer lion is shared with Cabbage's in the "cabbages" of French PLANTs. Cabbage's are first known in Northamptonshire with Late-like Ladys and Cork-like Kirkfields/Cherchfields, and Late's use "organ pipes."
You can click Organs now, which loads them on another tab in order to load other surnames, to better follow the heraldic links. I probably wouldn't have started this heraldic investigation if not for Organs looking like a possible Kirk branch. I've been claiming that God arranged heraldry, centuries ago, to jibe with certain events that I can find in the news, and then moved me to learn heraldic links to show how or why He points to those events. The investigation here is to find what could seem like heraldic evidence for God's confirmation that Erika Kirk, or something related to her, has been directly involved in, or has inadvertently facilitated, illegal / criminal organ transplants.
The Late's happen to be Letts too while Letter-branch Lauders share both the motto, "RepulluLAT," and tree stump, of Lorys, what seems like evidence that God arranged these heraldic links because Erika's mother is Lori Frantzve. This is what made me go ahead into the investigation.
While Lorys are also Laurie's, there's "laurel" in the Crest of TRANS'/Trents (share Plant rose), who were looked up as per organ TRANSplants. Look at how compelling that looks, as if God arranged it. I've been showing for years that Walch's/Walsh's are from "Wallachia," and while Wallachia is in Romania, Irish Walch's/Walsh's have a "TRANSfixus" motto term!
Romanian Angels is in Romania's Constanta, in the Dobruja area which is in, or at least beside, historical Wallachia. The latter holds the RIMNa (Ramna) river, where I traced the 600 Benjamites of Israel's RIMMON before knowing that it was in Wallachia, and before seeing that Scottish Walch's/Walsh's almost have the English Benjamin Coat. As per "Constanta," Constants/Constance's share the Lett/Late Chief in other colors.
As per "transplant," English Plants are first known in London with the Tooths who in turn share the Letter / Lauder griffin!!! The Lett-like Leiths/Lethe's (share Bellamy crescents) even have a Toth-like "to the" motto phrase, and while Late's/Letts have the organs pipes. Latters (Ayrshire with Corrigan-like Corricks/Carricks) have the Leith/Lethe crescents in colors reversed.
If that's not enough, English Plants use a "label" while Labels are listed with La Bells while Bells are first known in Dumfries with Lorys/Laurie's, Rimna-like Rims/Rome's/Rums, and Patents/PUTINs. The Rimna river is a tributary of the PUTNa. Rumillys/Romillys almost have the Constant Chief.
English Patents/Pattens (Essex with Youngs) share the lozengy Shield of OREMs and Schools/Scayle's/SCHOLE's, and the latter share the Benjamin, Young, and Walch/Walch annulet. The faked Kirk shooting was in Orem, and Orems are first known in Aberdeenshire with Lory/Laurie-beloved Cups. Scottish Youngs have three piles colors reversed from the triple piles of Latters. LinkLETTERs use a "SKOAL" motto, as well as "SHELdrake" ducks, and Shalls (Rhineland with SALome's) are also Scayle-like Schals. Shells look like kin of Shovels/Shoulers, first known in Hertfordshire with Scale's, and with the Vince's suspect in the motto of English Shields/Shiels. The latter have a "PATItur" motto term to go with the "pati" of sheldrake-using Sheldons (Worcestershire with Pattys). The Rimna is also the Ramna, and Rams are in Shield/Shiel colors and format.
Note the ShelDRAKE surname (Essex with Vere's and Rams), for Drake's and their Dragon branch can get us to count Dracula of Wallachia, for the late Nicholas de Vere von Drakenberg traced his Vere family's witchcraft to Transylvania, on the north side of Wallachia. Drake's are first known in Hampshire with Fer-connectable and Linkletter-beloved Checkers. Frantzve-like Ferrants (beside Friends/Frants), who use the Patent-connectable patonce cross, can take us to Italian Ferrants sharing the French Fer and Checker Coat. Linkletter-beloved Sheldrake's are first known in Essex with Patents/Pattens and patonce-using Chance's, while Scottish Patents are also Putins.
Shortly north of the mouth of the Putna is the mouth of the Trotus, and while Trots (share bear with French Benjamins) are also Truth's, the "Constant and true" motto of Scottish Rose's could be play on "Truth," especially if the "constant" motto term was created in the first place by a family from Constanta. Leiths share a "to the end" motto phrase with Home's/Hume's, and the latter, first known in Berwickshire with Lauders, use "TRUE to the end."
There is a German End/Ender surname sharing the Constant stars and the RASmussen unicorn, and Ras' are listed with the Scottish Rose's i.e. with a "Constant" motto code. The Rasmussen bend-with-fleur is colors reversed with Lett-beloved Pipe's (Staffordshire with Arrows/Arras'). Irish Walch's/Walsh's share the red arrow with English Enders (Cornwall with the Trysts in the "Keep tryst" motto of Hebrons).
German Rose's are first known in Silesia with Circle's/Kirkners, and German Rose's share the Coat of English Youngs while Scottish Youngs (share Walch/Walsh and Benjamin annulet) were said, until recently, to be first known in ROXburghshire with Scottish Walch's/Walsh's. The ROXolani lived on the Naparis (Ialomita) river at or beside Constanta.
This week, I came across a Kirschner surname, first known in Silesia with Circle's/Kirkners and Weis-branch Wies'. Circle's/Kirkners have been mentioned in recent updates along with Weiss-related Kepke's, for Circle's/Kirkners are in the same colors and format, and it just so happens that Kirschners have the Keip Coat in colors reversed, and almost the Rasmussen Coat too.
I've often repeated that Mr. Kepke, who almost married Miss Walsh at about 22 years of age, and I were sitting on the hood of my car, at Knob Hill Farms, when he spotted my teen girlfriend, Allison Bauer, getting into the car of Mike Denardo, a fellow stockboy with us. Allison left me that day for Mike. Denardo's share the lone tower of German Kirks, and while Scottish Allisons ("TRUTH" motto term), first known in Lanarkshire with Walsh-beloved Sions/Swans, are said to have been at Loupe, Loupe's use three of the Kirk towers who in turn share the Junk Coat. Jungs (Kepke colors and format) are listed with German Youngs, and Kepke lived beside Rick Young at the time. I showed how Scottish Yonge's share the Walch/Walsh annulet. Kepke's are first known in Saxony with Keip-connectable Ends/Enders.
This week, I came across a Kirschner surname, first known in Silesia with Circle's/Kirkners and Weis-branch Wies'. Circle's/Kirkners have been mentioned in recent updates along with Weiss-related Kepke's, for Circle's/Kirkners are in the same colors and format, and it just so happens that Kirschners have the Keip Coat in colors reversed, and almost the Rasmussen Coat too.
I've often repeated that Mr. Kepke and I were sitting on the hood of my car, at Knob Hill Farms, when he spotted my girlfriend, Allison Bauer, getting into the car of Mike Denardo, a fellow stockboy with us. Allison left me that day for Mike. Denardo's share the lone tower of German Kirks, and while Scottish Allisons are said to have been at Loupe, Loupe's use three of the Kirk towers. Bellamys, sharing the Bell fesse, are first known in Shropshire with the Tine's/Tyne's expected in the "obTINEbit" motto term of Tooths, for a Tyne river is near Lauder (Scotland). And zikers, Tooth-like Totts/Toths share the Coat of Criss' (and Christmans) who were in turn, in three of last month's five updates, a pointer to CRISIS actors hired for the staged Kirk-shooting event.
The Plants are thought to be from Geoffrey PlantaGENET, who was anciently given a broom-sprig symbol as code for the Brooms/Brome's, first known in Kent with GHENT-connectable Gaunts, and with the Hamons in turn having a "tot" motto term. Totts/Toths share the Coat of Criss-branch Christmans, first known in Hampshire with Ghents.
Criss' and Christmans have a giant swan, and the Irish Walch's/Walsh's have the swan too likely because they were from the Walsers/Walss', known to be named after Wallis canton, a Swiss province that holds the city of Sion/Sitten. Not only do Sittens share the Bellamy and Leith crescents, but swan-using Sions/Swans are first known in Lanarkshire with the Scottish Flemings while Benjamins use flames. The Deeds in the Fleming motto are first known in Norfolk with Benjamins. The Fleming motto is, "LET the deed shaw," and Letts/Late's come up as "Let." The double-tressure border of Flemings is shared with Lauders in colors reversed.
The Leith/Lethe crescents are in colors reversed from the ones of Latters who can point to the Mormons, the Latter Day SAINTs, because Scottish Saints/Sinclairs ruled at Roslin, 6 miles from the first-known Leiths/Lethe's of Edinburgh. A Henry Sinclair of Roslin came to rule Organ-like ORKNey, and the latter is where LinkLETTERs are first known. The staging of the Kirk shooting was in downtown Mormonland. Roslin is in Midlothian, where the Mens' are first known who are in the motto of Pipe-branch Pepins (and Poppins). The Lett organ pipes.
Walsers/Walss' are also Waltzers while English Walters/WATTERs share the boar head of Constant-loving Rose's/Ras' who in turn use the "WATER bouget." The Rose/Ras boar head is in the colors of the giant eagle of English Constance's (Cambridgeshire with Walters/Watters and Rumillys/Romillys), and Constants (almost have the Rumilly/Romilly Chief) are Constance's too. Jesse Watters interviewed Erika Kirk this week, but didn't ask the important questions, no surprise because Fox is half-news, half scared of getting sued / losing money for agreeing with "conspiracy theories."
Irish Walch's/Walsh's are first known partly in Waterford, and Waterfords (share the lilies with Rumillys/Romillys) share a Waterville variation with English Waters (Essex with Rose-connectable Youngs). German Walters are first known in Silesia with German Rose's (share English Young Coat) who in turn share one of the French Clair Coats while the other French Clairs are first known in Limousin with the Pine's expected in the Constant "pine tree." Tree's are listed with True's in the "Constant and true" motto of Scottish Rose's/Ras'.
French Pine's look very related to the Coat of Lords/LAUDs (Suffolk with English Clairs and Lodge's/Loge's) and Amptons while NorthAMPTONshire is where Ladys/LAUDymans and Waterfords are first known. Letts/Late's are in the "Lord, let" motto phrase of Glasgows. Latters are first known in Ayrshire (near Glasgow) with Wallis'/Wallace's. Letter-branch Lauders look like a branch of Lodge's/Loge's who in turn share the giant Wallis/Wallace lion. French Loge's are first known in Burgundy with Sire's/Sirets while the Putna river of Wallachia is a tributary of the Siret.
Burgundy is also where CUSSONs are first known sharing the giant eagle of English Constance's. Patents/Putins are first known in the same place as Kirkpatricks/Kilpatricks while Irish Kilpatricks use "CUSHIONs." Cussons essentially share the Ewe/CUIST Coat while KISS'/Cush's, a branch of Constance-connectable Custs and Cass' (same place as Walters/Watters), share the Waterford "fountain." Cousins are first known in Norfolk with Benjamins, Fountains/Fonts and Cue's/Kews while Font-de-Ville's are first known in Languedoc with Constants. I kissed Kepke's lady, Kim Walsh, on the cheek.
The Kewsh variation of Ewe's/Cuists look like the Kiev-line Cue's/Kews and Kevens/Kewans/Ewens (probably share the Ukrainian flag), and while Kiev is the Ukraine capital, beside Wallachia, Kepke's father was Ukrainian. Kevens/Kewans share the motto of Kilpatrick-related Maxwells (ROXburghshire) while Roxolani had a branch at the Kiev theater's Dnieper river (looks like "Naparis"). Maxwells use a LODGED stag.
The double-tressure border of Flemings and Lauders, and the single tressure border of Lodge's/Loge's, is code for Tresure's/Trashers (Suffolk with Lodge's/Loge's and Golds) once said to be first known in Somerset with Lode's/Lodders who share a giant, GOLD wolf with German Flemings/Flamings (Gold colors and format).
This week on the podcast, Starkey Farmstead, the video owner claimed that Charlie's father "was also a supporter of Mitt Romney as well as a donor for Romney's 2012 presidential campaign." Why would the father support a Mormon? Charlie's mother is Miss Smith, and Mormons were founded by Joseph Smith. Note how Romneys could be a pointer to "Romania." I think Romneys were kin of Pullys suspect in the Lauder and Lory/Lawrie motto, "RePULLulat." Romney was a U.S. senator for Utah.
I'll leave it up to you on deciding whether God arranged these links to snitch on Lori and/or Erika Kirk's murder of children to procure their organs. They say that pedophile rings often kill their victims eventually, to keep the secrets from spilling out. ABSOLUTE HORROR.
According to Robert Gouveia (youtube), both the prosecution and the defence are having secret meetings to secure a non-public trial, exactly to be expected in a faked trial. Robert suggests that Tyler Robinson is not showing up in pre-trial proceedings lest the public can see he's not the guy in the video images released by Utah / FBI.
On his Sunday live, Baron Coleman showed a clip of Rob McCoy claiming, in a church service three weeks before the Kirk shooting, said that Charlie had received death threats after shifting emphasis from Israel to "going after Muslims." This fake threat is expected where McCoy already knew that Charlie was going to feign his murder. McCoy and the TP team were trying to make it appear that Israel would have nothing to do with the murder, in case such a theory got juice.
NEWS
There are true anti-Semites in the anti-Gaza camp at this time, not surprising. I draw the line with support for a Palestinian state within Israel. I don't feel comfortable with such a thing in light of Biblical prophecy claiming that "Palestine" belongs to Jesus by a long-standing Reservation. This situation becomes scandalous where the Trump family de$ire$ Ga$a for thing$ that Jesus is expected to oppose.
Just think of what Trump said mere days ago, that Biblical prophecy will not come to pass under his watch. Just think of it, if you still accept this man gladly as a friend of Christians. I see Trump as so fake that I'm seriously wondering whether he will support, or even co-plot, the prophetic invasion of Israel. He's so old that he can't afford to wait very long for Israel to submit to his Gaza "peace" plan. Trump speaks like a trigger-happy monster in his second term, and while he portrays this attitude with angelic colors, one really needs to wonder whether B$$$s are the true motive in every case of his using military threats.
Trump didn't expound on what he meant by his forbidding Biblical prophecy from coming to pass. One theory is that he will not permit the anti-Christ from invading Israel. He may succeed in that task. A second theory is that he meant he won't allow Armageddon. However, the Gaza project is not helping to tame Israel's sworn enemies, but the very opposite. And Russia is showing itself willing to check the American military, maybe because it thinks that Trump is bluffing with his threats. Israel's' brutal attitude in Gaza is causing more people to lean toward the pro-Russia side of this dispute.
Trump knows he doesn't have a lot of time to fulfill his agendas, and so Rash could become his middle name when seeking / implementing what he thinks could be a Middle-East solution(s). His immediate problem is that Gaza's fighters won't give up their weapons. Trump's son-in-law has hinted that his part in the Gaza re-building project can begin in areas where there are no weapons. That could be interpreted as RASH.
Imagine the West "securing" a piece of Gaza, and beginning construction while surrounding the area with soldiers. Whose soldiers? What if Israel opposes the West coming in to frustrate its agenda for the new Gaza? What if the soldiers surrounding the construction sites get attacked routinely? What if the situation makes Muslim fighters across the Middle-East irate enough to muster a war front against Israel i.e. the anti-Christ invasion?
What could make the New Syria irate enough to allow a Muslim-wide invasion of Israel through Syria? Or, if Trump invades Israel when Netanyahu shows definite signs of opposing the foreign fingers in Gaza, wouldn't he start from the American base in southern Syria? Might he allow Muslims to join the attack, since Americans don't want to see their military people dying in more Middle-East battles? Therefore, I'm keeping eyes on how irate Trump becomes against Netanyahu. Trump wasted no time sending Vance to Israel to quell Israel's sabotaging of his peace plan.
Those who are thinking that this peace plan is the seven-year covenant of the anti-Christ, note that it's not peace deal with Israel, but with many other nations, many of which would support the invasion of Israel if things came to it.
The political fortunes of the Trump-Gaza side of the Republican party took another hit this week as neo-cons and pro-Israel forces came out and repeated their charge that people such as Tucker Carlson are anti-Semites. This has been the same losing tactic that caused Trump's voters to frown on Trump since the Kirk-shooting event. The truth is, Tucker et-al are anti-Israel-in-Gaza, and Trump is pro-Trump-family-in-Gaza. See the political problem?
This story on Scott Adams, podcaster, is interesting where he repented of being a COVID-vaccine pusher. His repentance seems to be complete to the max, but as he helped to kill and maim many people with his podcast message, his repentance is NOT complete until he feels appropriate remorse for his part in causing those injuries. I agree with Kim's take on this issue. I've never clicked on more than about one video from Scott Adams, because, I think, he looks part-goon, part-clown, behind that huge coffee cup. Hope he's become a Christian, but, if not now, then he is, he is, a goon.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZ9W2rZP0DsAccording to the youtube channel, Jackson Hinkle Official (I'm not very familiar with this man's positions), the current president of Nigeria, the one turning a blind eye to Christian mass-murder in his country by Muslim thugs, was once a cocaine dealer in Obama's old stomping grounds of Chicago. It could almost appear that Obama helped to set this president up, and, if so, is Obama starting some deathly movements against Christians in more than one country?
The video below features Jackson Hinkle who perfectly explains, in the first couple of minutes, why the ultra-pro-Israeli side is talking scandalously incorrect when accusing people like Candace Owens as "anti-Semitic." As Hinkle explains, even 60-percent of American Jews oppose Israel's attitude in Gaza, but that does not make these Jews anti-Semitic, of course:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyJEiF7hfSsTrump's Achilles' heel was left exposed this week as Republicans didn't come out to vote in a few state elections. Trump's "America first" image is taking a beating by those accusing him or being Israel first. The election-writing is on the wall such that Trump might need either to cool off his Gaza plans, or hide them better. Where's Trump's arrests for the vaccine criminals? Trump needs to turn down the energy toward foreign plot$ and in-country corporation$, and start protecting the people by seriously punishing the leaders of in-country gangs in high places, which includes many in-country corporates. Punishing in-country gangster is what excites his voters, that's what clobbers the leftist politicians. Alas, Trump is a traitor, he's made it so apparent already. There's 100,000 regular voters per one billionaire voter.
The Democrat corpse is starting to move, excitedly. Trump is giving it life with too-little too-late, and mountains of partnerships with big corporations, the very thing that allowed the Democrats to thwart would-be Republican wins from decades ago. Cut spending, big oaf, fulfill DOGE efforts, arrest the brazen guilty in military / Intelligence, deport en-masse the illegal Democrat voters.
Trump's trying to make believe that the government shut-down is hurting his recent popularity. No, stupid, it's you foreign policy, your entanglement with the war hawks after you made-believe that you would not be their friends prior to the election. Therefore, expect Trump to give appearances that he dislikes war hawks, because he's a make-believe shyster. I hope Trump is freaking enough to change course of the Epstein crime ring, and on the pro-Israel side that supports Erika Kirk versus Candace Owens.
Put it this way, government voters who vote Trump would be a lot happier waiting a few weeks longer for their government paychecks if they could trust Trump more, but everything he's done since the spring of this year has given the voters pause about his sincerity, because he spent the winter making the base believe that he was going gung-ho on fulfilling promises, only to quickly shift gears toward other things. He exposed himself as a shyster for good. There is no cure for this. He'll need to earn votes, from now on, with sweat on his brow. He'll need to become a workhorse for them, not for himself. They won't buy his promises anymore. Either produce continually, consistently, steadfastly, or shut up with false promise. The problem is, he seems to work hard (on camera only) to fool the base so that he can fulfill his own agenda when no one's looking. Has he been open by providing details on his Gaza-building plans? No, because he knows it's fodder for criticism from all voters. He looks like he's not saying anything about Charlie in order to protect his role in Gaza rebuilding. He doesn't want to take his voters' side on Charlie because it'll close the door to Netanyahu's heart.
The video below tends to prove that New York's FBI arrested Epstein in hopes that he would snitch on a Trump crime in relation to Epstein's crime ring. This is circumstantial evidence that Trump and Barr worked together to get Epstein freed from prison. As Comey's daughter was in charge of the Epstein prosecution, it could explain why Trump fired Comey as the FBI director i.e. knowing that Comey was after linking Trump and/or his friends / partners to Epstein. Since then, Trump has exposed that he's protecting high-level people threatened by the "Epstein files."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykUwp0bUxs8This is why I could never support Zelensky's war against Russia, because he was an enemy of the Ukrainian people. After Ukraine's demise arrived, Trump waltzed into Ukraine to seize its special rocks, when Zelensky was as good as a dead man walking:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srRg5EdYFKYI haven't heard Trump criticize the Israeli soldier who was caught, in video, raping a Palestinian prisoner. What's wrong with Trump? Is his part in Gaza rebuilding more important to him than his morality. YES.
In canada, all the courts up to the supreme chose to kill the 400 ostriches. They were shot this past week, executed in the near-vicinity of the owners, within earshot. The executors didn't even take the birds away to another location. Unlike in the United States, all the courts to the very top of canada are disgusting leftist swine. It's been this way since Trudeau Sr. The frightening thing is, these swine wish to kill some of the people too, and especially the anti-vaxxers. The murder of these ostriches was vaccine-related.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVntoQlEw9Mhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AM-HVJqbMTM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3W6El4Iwo8
They killed the ostriches by night for fear that drone cameras could capture the horror by day inside the hay walls of the British-Colombian "coliseum." I say, put the people responsible inside those fours walls, with 25 men on the walls with machine guns, and fire at will, nice and slow, and have a great time watching them scramble, frantically. I hope the courts can take a joke, but, why not also throw the supreme court in there, and have even more fun. After all, they all deserve it, and nobody who has a heart cares about it if they die very horribly, no doubt about that. I'm just expressing how people all across this world feel at this week's end when they hear this story. Great shame, supreme court, great-great shame, spineless, immoral enemies of Jesus.
I've heard that the Biden administration set up the current Nigerian government, wherefore I can see the possibility that the Muslim attacks on Nigerian Christians had gotten more than a thumbs-up by Obama during the Biden years.
In canada, under carney, beef from cloned cows can now be sold without informing buyers. Not long from now, canada would sell us manufactured "meat" without notice on packaging. That's the sort of WEFer pigs that make up carney's cabinet. The buck stops with him. If his government, from the RCMP to Intelligence to food lords to price increases to censors to tax collectors are human swine, logic dictates that he's the Chief Pig Priest.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5QSt1_9zGx0The parliamentarian representatives of the canadian people had the opportunity to call a new election this past week, but: "While the Bloc’s [non-confidence] motion had support from the seven NDP MPs and from Green Party Leader Elizabeth May, both the Liberals and the Conservatives voted against it, ensuring that it failed on the floor of the House." I can't get google to tell me why Poilievre's conservatives didn't vote for a new election this winter, for it was in their hands to do so.
To show how sick canada is, the Quebec party that voted for a new election did so because: "The Bloc called on the House of Commons to reject the budget on the basis that it did not provide a top-up for Old Age Security recipients and contained insufficient measures to fight climate change, amongst other grievances." In other words, instead of calling for lower prices, the Quebec party wants to increase government spending even on the climate scam. Corruption masked as mere lunacy is deeply imbedded in this country. When politicians are willing to openly portray themselves as climate lunatics, you know there's a lot of tax money going missing to climate fiends and their political helpers.
There would be a new election this winter if the Progressive Conservatives voted this week for non-confidence. I've heard that there is a third vote to be held, in an effort to pass the carney budget after two failed votes, on November 17. If it budget doesn't get enough votes, it kicks off an automatic election. carney is one vote shy. I assume that the Conservatives prefer to kick off an election from the failure of the budget rather than pushing the party out with non-confidence, but with such a close vote, it sure looks risky.
carney succeeded to wipe off, of his party's political suit, the trudeau snot only because there are enough canadians who gladly champion a deceiver who deceives good enough. So long as trudeau was taking an unpopular trouncing, these liberal canadians were compelled to cool on him, but if carney comes along and does a better job looking popular, they vote for the same agenda as trudeau, of blatant and chronic tax thievery with overwhelming RCPM and judicial support.
Why would liberals vote for tax thievery? In return for the anti-Bible society. It's true. That's their bottom line, the same that has been developing in all countries since the onset of evolution and the "age of reason." That war has never stopped. It began with thievery of the educational channels, and censorship of Creationism. Certain canadians in the minority helped to champion censorship of Christians, and for this reason I became upset with the leadership of canadian churches for not taking the fight to the political beast. You saw with your own eyes that when a handful of pastors rebelled against the COVID scam, 98-percent of pastors were as-if dead. We had to depend on the truckers to save us from forced vaccinations via concentration-camp detainment. This effort has not gone away. The carney government will try it again, I feel sure.
Here's only one example of educational channels using deception. A couple of BBC chiefs were forced to resign over this disclosure:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AM-HVJqbMTMClimate-change goons in the news are saying nothing on how cold the weather is in November, as compared to normal, as it relates to debunking climate change. But as soon as the weather is warmer than average for a month or less, out come the goons. For years they lied to us about melting ice caps, until somebody started to spread the news that sea levels had not been, and are still not, rising as per the expectation of the melting ice. Buggers.
Now that it appears that the U.S. government will re-open on roughly November 14, we hear, at exactly the time that the Senate voted to defacto re-open, that the Jewish AIPAC organization is spending some $20M to destroy the job of congressman, Thomas Massie. The "problem" with re-opening the government is that Massie had the 218 votes (might be down to 217 now, not enough) to force Bondi to publicize some Epstein files that the House has been fighting tooth and nail to not release as Massie extensively as Massie's bill wants them released. Epstein was/is an Israelite-supported criminal.
Word is that senator Schumer forced eight of his Democrats to vote for re-opening, suggesting that the closing was hurting Democrats more that Republicans. That's a good sign. Schumer's sick and criminal side wanted tax money, to supply illegal voters in the country, as part of their government-closing strategy i.e. they sought not to re-open until Republicans granted them the money, but everyone can see the corruption of that tactic.
AI is fast becoming the atheist's worst nightmare. It's going to need a do-over such that it starts to get in line with atheistic declarations, which is why you need to be on-guard against AI's potential to confirm the established lies of evolution, etc. In the video below, AI tells atheists that they are STUPID to reject the Shroud of Jesus as authentic evidence of His Resurrection. AI's theory below that Jesus' physical body was turned to non-material could be correct:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RNMnK-oey8Here's one of the reasons that most scientists reject Creationism:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxYS02S8Bs4The video owner above seems to ridicule a "vast, nefarious" conspiracy theory in evolutionism camps. It's not to ridicule because it not only exists, but is part of the reason that most scientists are evolutionists, because Creationists are weeded out of science-based occupations by a vast, nefarious conspiracy. Why should that even come as a surprise? The purpose of evolution teaching has always been to wipe out belief in God with one swoop. Jesus will inform His people, in their consciences, that this is ground zero for the wicked condition of the world today, a century after evolution took hold in schools.
We can ask the evolutionists: why is it that 99-percent of all scientists are too STUPID to realize that the fossil record disproves evolution? There is not one creature in the fossil record showing the evolution of the wing. Sorry, stupids, liars. Amongst the 99-percent of scientists are the FREAKs, the vast minority of people who hold an opinion on whether Creation was by God, or by mere mutational, freak-action. Only an idiot thinks that mutations created humans, and anyone who despises His own Creator is an arrogant IDIOT. satan, for example, who thinks he's wise and capable enough to topple the throne of God. For the slim chance of winning the war against God, he's willing to destroy his own life, and the lives of his supporters. The evolutionist activist will send his own children to Hell on behalf of this war, GREAT SHAME.
I asked google, "how long does it take a tadpole to evolve into a frog?" It responded with "evolve" not in the answer: "It takes an average of 14 weeks for a tadpole to become a frog, though the timeline can vary depending on the species, water temperature, and the availability of food. This transformation is called metamorphosis and involves the tadpole growing legs, developing lungs, and absorbing its tail." In other words, it doesn't take millions of years to evolve fish with gills into an amphibian, if God places the program into its genes to do it in weeks. Why can't evolutionists admit to that much? Do they really think that mutations created this program in tadpoles? FREAKS with freak-show "science." When a worm evolves into a butterfly, with WINGs, that's God laughing at the evolutionists. Poor spiritual slobs, making a mess of everything real.
Do they really believe that mutations gave the spider the ability to walk on its own web while other creepers get stuck in it? Do they really believe that mutations happen-chance allowed the spider to both roll out and roll in its web material, and that even after its rolled into its body, it can get it out again as a single strand without weak / missing points ? Do think this is an easy task to accomplish, the creation of the glands that create, maintain, and feed out the web material? How did mutations manage to keep this sticky substance from coming out a small hole like pebbles in spits and spurts? All in all, does the spider's strand look like something blind chance accomplished? Then why do the freaks teach that it happened that way? Is it because they are truly the naive, the ignorant, the ones who don't properly think things through?
Do not send your kids to university or college but at great risk to their minds and souls. Do not send them to public school but at great risk of them falling in with the children of dark-souled parents. Do the parents have sewer mouths? Do they put an ear ring in the 5-year old's male ear? These are signs to keep your kids away from these parents and their households. Protect each other from profuse satanic elements.
Here's a re-usable fire starter for trib survival:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lf8doKGfgbw
NEXT UPDATE Next MondayHere's all four Gospels wrapped into one story.
For Some Prophetic Proof for Jesus as the Predicted Son of God.
Also, you might like this related video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3EjmxJYHvM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efl7EpwmYUs