I'm no sure whether I should be writing this section. I'm wondering what you're going to think. I was talking to someone who told me of a dream he had in which he was told that the Biblical beast would rise up from the GROUND as a man of war. The man having the dream believes, as I do, that the anti-Christ will be a neo-Seleucid war man in the Middle-East, a view that's getting around, important for those taught that the beast will be primarily / solely a European dictator / pope.

Tending to believe with him that the dream is from God, I asked him by email why he thinks the beast rose up from the ground. After emailing, my natural inclination to go to heraldic investigation told me right off the bat that the Grounds/Grundys (almost the Rhodes Coat) can be gleaned as Rhodes kin, and that's when I remembered that the Rhodian Illuminati may have been behind the empowering / founding of Syrian Baathists many decades ago. That's also when I remembered the heraldry I did years ago as per the co-founders of the Baathists, Mr. Bitar and Mr. Aflaq.

I had found it interesting that both Bitars/Butters and Aflacks use the same cross, essentially, and that Baathist-lime Baths have the same fat cross but in different colors. The Bath Coat happens to be much the Rhodes Coat in colors reversed, you see. But this heraldry comes from years ago.

Yesterday, as I write here, I loaded Bitters rather than "Bitar," for Bitters, new to me, were loaded in my last update. To my great surprise, Bitters have the Rhodes roundels in colors reversed, and moreover the Bitter roundels are those of German Rhode's. It surprised me more to see a SUN in the Bitter Crest because Suns/Sinclairs share the fat cross of Bitars and Aflacks. It's in the colors of the fat saltire of Bath-like Bats, the latter first known in Shropshire with Bitters! The Athlek variation of Aflacks suggests the Athels, first known in Perthshire with Bitars/Butters. But there was more to tweak our interest.

Just realized: Baathists are mainly SUNNI by religion! The new-to-me Bitters have a sun in a HAND. The Sunny surname is first known in Berkshire with Batters! Bats are first known in Shropshire with Meschins of the Bessin, and Bessins (Cheshire with Hands, beside Shropshire) are also BEASTs. The latter share the bee with sun-using Bathgate's!

Aflacks are first known partly in Angus, where Shuters are first known while Shute's come up as "Shitt," suggesting a pointer to Shi'ite Baathists.

Yesterday, I reflected on the statement from Revelation telling that the beast will have one foot on the earth (ground), and one foot on the sea. But it's only now, this minute, that I've seen the Ground/Grundy Coat again, that is shares the martlets FEETs/Fate's, first known in Yorkshire with Grounds/Grundys and Rhodes'. That's pretty incredible, but there's more from my findings of yesterday.

Before going to yesterday's finds, I can first add that Foots are first known in Cheshire with the Shirts having the German Rhode Coat on a white Shield. Foot-branch Fothes'/Fette's are first known beside Prophets/ProFETTs, a pointer possibly to the False Prophet. Pro-like Peare's were kin of Thames' in turn using the Feet/Fate martlets, and the Chief/Shield colors of Thames' (Oxfordshire with Dire's) are in reversed with Dire's suspect in the "diriget" motto term of Bitars/Butters.

Note the "AthLEK" variation of Aflacks, for Lecks/Lakeys have a version of the Shirt Coat (itself almost the Rhode Coat). The Prime's in the "praeMIUM" motto term of Lecks/Lakeys goes nice with the "meum" motto term of Rhodes', and the "VitutTIS" motto term of Lecks/Lakeys goes nice with the "HosTIS" term of Shirts, for both the latter and Lecks/Lakeys share the chevron of Tiss'/Teese's, first known in Hampshire with Sturs while STIRlingshire is where Lecks named a Leckie location, and the Earth's are first known in Stirlingshire too. The beast is portrayed with one foot on the EARTH.

I can link Laevi-connectable Tease's/Tess' to Lennox's/LEVENax's, first known in Stirlingshire and sharing the Leck/Lakey roses. Ground-connectable LEVENs are in Rhode colors and format, and Levins share the Chief-Shield of Earths! The red rooster in the Earth Crest might just be the gold-red one in the Crest of LEVers who in turn have their rooster "STANDing on a TRUMPet."

Stands/Stains/STANs share the double fesses of Aflack-like Flags/Flacks. STANleys look very related to the Coat of SONNYs/Staneys in turn sharing the scallops of Rinds, in turn first known in Perthshire with Bitars/Butters. It's very interesting that while Rinds have "gillie flowers", Julani-like Jewels/Jowells (Kent with Flowers) have "gillyflowers". A SUNNI character once calling himself Mr. Julani/JAWLANi/Jolani (various spellings online) now rules Syria.

Plus, German Joels almost have the Coat of TUNNo's/Tunnels!!! Mr. ATOUN is Julani's co-ruler in Syria. Tunno's/Tunnels, sharing the hexagram of German Joels, Jewish Reitmans, and Jewish Rotens/Rothenburgs/REITburgs, are first known in Northumberland with Riets/Reeds and Roddens/Rodhams. Hillary Rodham married Bill Clinton the Rhodian Scholar i.e. part of Rhodian globalism.

Stans/Stains are first known at or near SPITALfield (Middlesex) while Spitzer's use a "three green HILLs, a TUNNEL in the CENTER one." Hills are first known in Worcestershire Center-connectable Sandys, and with Hillarys who in turn share the six fitchees of Clintons! And while Lake's are first known in Oxfordshire (near Spitalfield) with Clintons, Spittels, looking related to the Bond Coat, are first known in Dumbartonshire with Lecks/Lakeys. Bonds were related the Earths.

Spitzers love the Centers/SAINTers while Suns/Sinclairs are also Saints. Centers/Sainters share the leopard faces of Parsons, first known in Norfolk with Leck-beloved Hollys, and of Peare's, first known in Oxfordshire. Levens share the elephant head (different colors) with Irish Sanders while German Centers and Sanders too. The latter's Chief-Shield colors is reversed from the same of Earth's (same place as Lennox's/LEVENax's).

Lennox's were related to the PEERless'/NAPier's in turn first known in Perthshire with Athels and Bitars/Butters. Antioch-like Anticks (Surrey with Sands), with a Pierre-connectable parrot, have Nap-like endings. NaPIER. Pettys use a parrot too, and are first known in Warwickshire with Peers/Peirs. Antioch was the Seleucid capital, and

I'll shortly show how the Shirts link to an Antioch-related location in Seleucus-like Sulcis, but let's not lose sight of the fact that an Antioch-like surname exists in connection with Bitars. Then, Seleucus-like Sellicks share the Chief-Shield of Earth's, and add two pierced stars in gold, as Clintons do in their Chief. Sellicks are first known in Herefordshire, beside the CLENT hills (Worcestershire with Hillarys), and Clents not only list Clints, but share the crescents of Blythe's while Bill Clinton was birthed by Mr. Blythe. I've had reasons to see the Clintons in cahoots with canadian Liberals.

Having gone to SELLicks, we now go to SELkirks, sharing the "salaMANDER" with their Douglas kin while Manders can be gleaned as Rhodes kin, from the Maeander river near the Greco island of Rhodes. Then, Selkirks share the Chief-Shield colors of Sellicks and Deaths too, but also share the motto of Douglas', both sharing a motto term ("jamais") of James', the latter first known in Surrey with Anticks. See that? It looks like God's pointer to the Seleucid-related anti-Christ, and the Earths and Grounds can apply to surnames in this paragraph.

The ANT river in Norfolk apparently named Antinghams, and the Hollys in the Leck/Lakey Coat are first known in Norfolk with the Antrims/Antinghams in turn sharing the bend of Lake's. ANTick. Lake's, whom I link to Brace's, are first known in Oxfordshire with Parrot-branch Peare's, and Brace's are first known in Herefordshire with Sellicks while Bracebridge's are first known in Lincolnshire with leg-using Leaks/Leakeys. Aflack-like Flags/Flacks are first known in Norfolk.

The giant, Leck-like leg of Prime's (Lincolnshire) takes us to the giant leg of PROphets/ProFETTs, and it gets interesting where Lecks/Lakeys are first known near the Trump-connectable Leggs. Peartree's/Patria's (Aberdeenshire with Prophets/Profetts), sharing the Trump stag head, were once said to be first known in Kincardineshire with Fothes'/Fette's. Pierro's/Pero's share the fesse of Bitters (share sun with Peartree's/Patria's) and almost have the Coat of Butter-like Butts/Bute's/Boets. The latter share the Button/BIDEN fesse, and the latter, said to have officiated at BATH and Wells, almost have the Feet/Fate Coat.

Already, we have quite a load of heraldic coincidences tending to suggest that the beast will be amongst the Baathist Muslims. Yesterday, I loaded Earths/Arthe's/D'Arth's and their branch, the Deaths/Dearths. The Earth's have this: "...the ancient family of Earth, by whose heiress, when the male branches became extinct, it was carried to the Bonds." The "orbis" motto term of English Bonds is translated, "world," but was apparently created to honor the Earth's. English Bonds, sharing the Sunny fesse, share "An eagle rising", both brown, with Aflacks.

Italian Bondi's are Blondi's too while Blonds are first known in Suffolk with Sea-branch Seamans.

Sea's are first known in Kent with Deaths/Dearths, and while Sea's share the triple-wavy fesses of German Drummonds, Scottish Drummonds are first known in Perthshire with Bitars/Butters, yet these Drummonds also named Drymen...in Stirlingshire, where Earths/D'Arthe's are first known. Donald Trump is said to descend possibly from Drumpfs.

We just saw Earths triggering the Sea's to topic in a way that doesn't seemed forced or manipulated by me. Again, Earths are implied to have married the Bonds, and then Dutch Bonds share the Coat of the Dire's suspect in the Bitar/Butter motto. Earth's share the Coat of VILAINs, the latter suspect from a Traby-of-Poland marriage to Astikas' of VILNius, and English Bonds share the Treby / Pitt besants. Trebys are first known in Devon with English Stewarts, and Pitts share the checkered fesse of Scottish Stewarts, the latter from the Alans of Dol in the province of Vilaine.

English Alans (Shropshire with Bitters), ruling Arundel, share the Bitter and Rundel/Roundel fesse; Bitters use roundels, and Rundels/Roundels are first known in Kent with Deaths/Dearth's and Sea's while the latter share the wavy fesse of Dols. Bitters are first known in MUNSlow while Muns'/Moyne's/Munds (Kent with Pitt-branch Petts and Munds/Munts) share the Chief of Trebys (Devon with Monks/Moyne's). Pitts (share Treby / Muns/Moyne besants) are first known in Dorset with Moons. For what it could be worth, I see Monks from Monaco, where prince Grimaldi has a PURPLE throne.

Trabys/Sadowski's use a "scarf" while Scarfs (Yorkshire with Grounds/Grundys and Rhodes') share the triple wolf heads of Bathers while Baths have most of the Rhodes Coat in colors reversed. This Arms of Traby (from Wikipedia's Traby horn article, with Astikas') looks like it has 666 in the strings of the horns.

I'm going to bring us back to the German Rhode's almost having the Coat of Shirts/SHARDs, for Italian Bondi's are first known in SARDinia, location of Sant'ANTOCio, itself at Seleucus-like Sulcis. King Seleucus, the forerunner to the end-time anti-Christ, had a son, Antiochus, who in turn named the Antioch (in Syria), second capital of the Seleucid dynasty. Might the Baathists (founded in Syria) have descended from Seleucus? If that's not enough, the Levens, first known in Shropshire with Bats and Bitters, share the elephant with Grounds/Cranne's while being in German Rhode colors and format.

I'll even add that the Levens add a chevron-with-stars in colors reversed from the same of Cars/Kerrs who in turn have Syria-like motto terms.

The amazing thing beyond those amazing things is that Italian Amori's are likewise first known in Sardinia while "Amor" is a motto term of Scottish Grounds/Cranne's. We saw above how English Grounds/Grundys almost have the Rhodes Coat except that Grounds/Grundys share the martlets of Feets and Thames', the latter first known in Oxfordshire with Amore's and Damorys/Amori's. The latter two almost have the Coat of English Poussins (Oxfordshire) while French Poussins share the BATHgate Coat. Amore's are first known in Oxfordshire with the Yellows who in turn share part of the English Bond Coat in colors reversed. Earths became Bond kin.

I'll therefore remind you that the dream of my email friend claimed that the beast will come up from the ground. The flag of Syria shares the stars of Seers, Cars/Kerrs and Levens. Levins (not "Leven") almost have the Earth Coat, what are the chances? The Cars/Kerrs have a motto, "Sero sed Serio," and the Car stars are in colors reversed from those of Seer-like Sere's. The "proXIMi" motto term of Grounds/Cranne's can be partly for Kims, first known in Butter-like Bute, and then Irish Carrs share estoiles on blue with English Bute's/Butts.

Sere's (share Car/Kerr chevron) are first known in Languedoc with Pierre's while Parrots share the Chief-Shield combination of Seers. A giant "parrot...holding up its left FOOT" is with Antioch-like Anticks.

[Insert, on Tuesday after this update was uploaded to the Internet -- Feets/Fate's share the Pavia martlets while Pierro's/Pero's/Petri's (roses, Rus / Rosh symbol) are first known in Pavia, home of Laevi Gauls. Is the anti-Christ going to descend from the Laevi? English Leavells have a different-color version of the "foot"-using Blond Coat, and Blondi's are first known Sardinia with Sulcis! I missed this heraldic set until now.

Babe's, now said to be first known in Suffolk with Blonds, were Blond kin, both having the sun in Crest for an additional pointer to the Sunni Baathists. Blonds put a "foot" over their sun! Ukrainian Babys share the Arms of Meulan, and the Beaumont rulers of Meulan married Waleran de Leavell. Babe's were once said to be first known in Dorset with Beaumonts, beside the first-known English Leavells and Pile's, and then while Scottish Leavells have "piles," Pile's share the leopard face of Pero- / Parrot-connectable Peare's.

The Italian Pavia's have a Coat version of the Moons (Dorset with Beaumonts) while the other English Beaumonts share the Moon crescent. One of the English Beaumonts share's the motto of English Nickle's/Nichols, first known in Cheshire with Foots, and with the CARDINE's sharing their Nickle/Nichol pheon. The Cardine motto loves the Amore's almost having the English Leavell and Blond Coat while Italian Amori's are first known in Sardinia with Blondi's. The "Fide" motto term of Beaumonts must be for the Fido variation of Fothes'/Fette's.

Blonds and Blondville's are both first known in Suffolk with Toune's (see Mr. Atoun below), and Blundville's, descended from earl Ranulph de Gernon, are first known in Cheshire with Shirts/SHARDs and Foots, and then Gernons have a "cyFOETH" motto term. Fothes'/Fette's, sharing the Foot chevron, are first known in KinCARDINEshire, where Peartree's/Patria's were once said to be first known. The latter use fitchee crosses while Fothes'/Fette's are also Fitts while English Fitts are also Fitch's/Fitchets (Essex with Montfitchets) while Gernons are said to have been from MontFITCHET.

As Peartree'/Patria share the Shuter fitchees, I'll repat from above: "Aflacks are first known partly in Angus, where Shuters are first known while Shute's come up as "Shitt," suggesting a pointer to Shi'ite Baathists." Thames'/Tame's, sharing the Peare chevron-with-stars, share the chevron (without the stars) of pear-using Abbots (Oxfordshire with Thames'/Tame's and Peare's) who in turn have a "patria" motto term.

I almost never mention that Peare's are listed with Pearls, but then it's interesting that the attack on the Russian airport is being likened by many to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. Oxfordshire is where Amore's are first known wnile Amori's are first known in Sardinia with Shirts/Shards, and the latter's Schirrard variation was held by one man said (in the Shirt/Shard wrire-up) to be descened from the "Lord of HARBORough." Interesting.

I've been claiming for years that Laevi Gauls (predated Annas and Caiaphas) were of the Levite blood in the chief priests who offered Jesus up unwittingly as the Lamb of God. I'm not suggesting that the anti-Christ will be Jewish, for Laevi were pagans far removed from Israel, yet, possibly, the anti-Christ may descend logically from the chief priests in the brackets above. I can link this discussion to Masci's and Meschins, from the Gog-related Meshech and Rosh. Rothschilds and many of their family members are "Jewish."

I also missed the fact that Italian Pavia's and MALLets (Suffolk with Towns/Toune's) share the Townsand scallop. Very interesting. MAULE's Yorkshire with Pavers and Meschins of Skipton) share the other Pavia scallop, and Pavers share the checks in the Arms of Meulan. Pavers also share the lozenges of Caiaphas-like Chaffs (share the Capes and Parrot Chief-Shield colors), first known in Dorset with Beaumonts, Beaks and ChafFINCH's. Finchems (Norfolk with FLACKs sharing the Meschin scallops) essentially share the Coat of Babe-related Beaks.

The Meschins who birthed Ranulph de Gernon married Lucy Taillebois (Lincolnshire with Gernon-connectable ARMys), and Tailbois' (Lincolnshire) share a Pavia / Maule scallop too. Chaffs (same place as Beaumonts) share the giant griffin of Bath-like Battle's expected in the embattled pattern that surrounds the AFLACK Cross. BITARs/Butters show the same-type arm as is in the Battle Crest (!) for potential linkage to Baathist-like Baths, yet a purple one is in the Crest of Darks, the latter sharing the Bat saltire! Beaumonts/BELLmonts share the cross of neighboring BATHs (Somerset with Battins) while Aflacks almost have the cross of Bats (Shropshire with Meschins and BELLamys). The Dark arm is in a different color on the Crest of ArmSTRONGs while Strongs are first known in Somerset with Baths. End insert]

Nahum 1:11 seems to suggest that the end-time anti-Christ rises out of Nineveh, now Mosul. Who else could the wicked one of that verse be, since it's unusual for Old-Testament prophecy to even mention Nineveh? So far as I last heard, the two top leaders of the New Syria includes Abdel Rahim ATOUN, and then English Towns/TOUNE's, first known in Suffolk with Mosels, are in Mosel colors and format. Coincidence? Atoun and Julani were likely affiliated with the Sunni and Baathists that had taken hold of Mosul under the Obama administration. Atoun was involved in Idlib, near Antioch.

Scottish Towns are first known in West Lothian with BATHgate's. Another coincidence? Or did God stack the deck? Bathgate's share the sun with Bitters, the latter first known in the same place as Bats while Bathgate's are also Batgate's. Suns/Sinclairs (MidLOTHIAN) share the Bitar/Butter cross. Sinclair-connectable Clare's are first known in Suffolk with Towns/Toune's. French Clare's have the Bitter Chief in colors reversed. Clare's of TUNbridge Wells were in Kent with Earth-branch Deaths/Dearths, and the Bat-connectable Darks. The latter's Arques branch is in the write-up of Tankerville's of Tannerdevilla while Tanners incorporate the Coat of Death-branch Earths.

Irish Clare's have an "ANTIQUE IRISH CROWN". Anticks are first known in Surrey with Irish-like Rush's/Rish's! From the Varangian Rus. Rush's/Rish's (compare with Craun/Crain fesse) were once said to be first known in Suffolk with crown-using Crauns/Crains, the ancestry of which may have named, Ukraine.

I should probably add that Bath-like Boths/Booths (Yorkshire with Grounds/Grundys, Rhodes' and Bush's") share the boar heads of Mosels and Bush's.

I think I've exhausted the heraldry, for now, anyway. I may not come back to it. It gives me/us more reason to expect the anti-Christ rise in Baathist Syria / Iraq.

The start of News section below has more heraldry that could connect mark carney to the topic at hand. His pick for his chief of staff is a classic globalist, Marc-Andre Blanchard. The Blanchards are in Rhode colors and format, and share the besants of Rhodes-related Manders, the latter first known in Devon with Rods. English Blanks/Blanch's (share TANKerville cinquefoil) are in the colors and format of Roads/Rode's. Rhodes' are first known in Yorkshire with Tanks/Tancreds and Tankerville-connectable Maule's. The Blanchard griffin head is in the colors of the giant griffin of Battle's expected in the embattled pattern of Aflacks.

Solar-Wind Proton Trash

Time to pound on evolutionists liars, self-inflicted fools. They are not in the field of evolution only, but in all the sciences. They helped to develop the fields in physics, particle physics, and cosmology. They then took science establishments over, pushing Creationists away, and finally bragging that science is mainly evolutionist as "proof" that evolution is the most-credible belief system. Ya, sure, kick out the competition, then tell everyone that most scientists are not Creationists, fiendishly giving the impression that Creationism is unscientific.

Two updates ago, I told why they do not understand the black color of sunspots, because they, control freaks with a world agenda to destroy God, do not hold the correct definition of light waves as literal waves through the light-wave-medium of solar-wind electrons. What could make more sense, yet they rejected it even after the discovery of the solar wind containing free electrons.

To make us believe that these electrons are not important in the solar wind, they lied, telling that the solar wind possesses protons too. But there cannot exist bare-naked protons, as they claim there are. The reason they lied about the existence of solar protons is that they did not want to violate their claim that protons cannot be destroyed. They reasoned that, when the sun releases electrons to such a great scale as exist in the solar wind, there had to be protons released too that once held the electrons. Ya-but, duh, if this is true, why don't the solar-wind protons re-load with the solar-wind electrons?

Plus, complete shysters that they are, they told us that the solar wind has exactly as many protons as it has electrons, not because they truly discovered this to be true by some experiment in space, but because their atomic model stupidly assigns one electron per one proton in every atom. They claim that a giant proton has as much positive-charge force as one wee electron has negative-charge force. STUPID. They make that claim because their "fathers" wanted a simple atom where one proton holds only one orbiting electron, COMPLETELY IMPOSSIBLE.

I read it myself years ago, that the solar wind is half electrons, half protons. Not anymore. google AI is now telling that protons "are the most abundant particles, making up about 95% of the solar wind." There can be only one explanation for this nonsense: the establishment wants to obliterate the solar wind's definition as freed electrons. It's nonsense because it's impossible for naked, solar protons to be freed from the sun without the electrons they once held also being freed. THEY LIE, apparently to hide the electrons that truly define the solar wind, thus hiding the "aether" that they foolishly rejected a century ago.

Another reason for their abandoning the half-electron half-proton claim of years ago is that it tends to help explain why the protons don't reload with the electrons to become what they view as hydrogen atoms. NASA falsifies all sorts of things with the war on God being the priority. They yet have the problem of explaining why the electrons in the solar wind are alone, not captured by the many protons in their midst. They do add helium in with the solar wind, which could be a trick to give appearances of naked solar-wind protons and free electrons coming together to form atoms, because this is the expectation where naked protons exist with free electrons.

BUT, the fakes did not eradicate all of the free electrons from the solar wind, because those particles are, in truth, the main, living / healthy constituents of the solar wind by far. If there is protonic material in the solar wind, it's either dead or crippled, unable to attract back their electrons, or at least all of them. The continual spewing of free electrons from the sun indicates a vast destruction of protons within the sun.

What do you think it could mean that something hot emits electrons? Ah, er, duh, if you answered that it makes heat look defined as free electrons, congratulations, there's more hope for you than an evolutionist ape.

I now want to buck against their claim that the solar wind does not enter the earth atmosphere, very convenient for protecting their erroneous definition of heat as the MOTION of atoms, any atoms. In their bonehead theory, the faster atoms speed about, the hotter the environment. In reality, the higher the density of free electrons (not attached/captured by atoms), the hotter the environment. Free electrons act both as literal heat and the light-wave medium. But as it's important to cosmic evolution from the big bang not to define heat as a material all its own, the wackos stick to their atoms-in-motion definition. That's not science, it's dressing up the make-believe big bang to look like truth. And that's what the goofs have done in many fields of science, chosen theories that best suit the big bang, especially when the ailing big bang badly needs some walking shoes from some field of science.

Lest the people realize that free electrons from the sun is what heats the earth, they say that solar-wind electrons are deflected away from earth by its "magnetic field." Everyone trusts these demonic liars such that they are all convinced that a magnetic field exists, that the earth has both a south and north pole, which is trash, untrue. The earth is not a magnet.

It it were a magnet, then all of the naked protons in the solar wind should be attracted to the earth's negative pole while the free electrons should be attracted to the opposite pole. But that's not happening, which is evidence that they lie all over the place on the topic of the solar wind. Attraction of solar-wind particles expects that they should enter the atmosphere, but the liars have arranged a magician's trick in which, somehow, the particles are shuffled off above the atmosphere to the sides of the planet.

Here's proof for anyone who thinks out-of-the-box for themselves: "Typically, these compasses work great in the Northern Magnetic Zone (see map), and will usually work halfway down into the Equatorial Magnetic Zone. But once you start approaching the Southern Magnetic Zone, you will begin to have issues with the needle dragging in the capsule." That's a google offering in my search as to whether compasses work in Australia. Apparently, the north end of a compass needle, in Australia, will point into the ground, and therefore will have trouble circling toward North.

Fine, I accept that as true, but, the point is, if the south pole was itself magnetic, then the south end of the magnetic needle would point south with no difference to how it points FINE AND DANDY to the north on the northern hemisphere. A compass should work in the southern hemisphere as well as it works in the northern hemisphere, if the south pole were itself attracting the compass needle. But as you read above, only the north end of the compass needle points to a pole of the earth, yet the person who wrote the quote above WAS NOT GOOD ENOUGH to point this out, because that person is a stooge of the scientific establishment, not thinking for self, but simply believing what he/she is told, then repeating it like an unwitting victim.

The south end of a compass needle points south, on a compass in the United States, not because it's attracted by the south pole, but because the north end of the needle is attracted by the north pole, and, ONLY CONSEQUENTLY does the opposite end of the needle point south. I accept that there's some electromagnetic charge near the north pole, but I'm claiming with the evidence above that there's no opposite charge at the south pole. Thus, the earth is not a magnet with two poles of opposite charge. Therefore, there is no "earth's magnetic field."

Without their magnetic field around the planet, it obliterates the claim that the earth magnet deflects AWAY ALL solar-wind electrons such that they don't enter the atmosphere. In that case, what do you suppose happens to the electrons as they strike the air? If you answered: they strike the air when they strike the air, fabulous, you have logic. There is nothing odd or difficult to grasp about the solar wind crashing into the air.

Plus, as the air is not filled with naked protons, that's how you can know that tricksters are behind the claim that a magnetic field has shuffled them away, in order that the magicians might not be discovered as liars when claiming that the solar wind is almost all naked protons. They think that you cannot disprove that claim, but you can, by showing that the earth's south pole is not magnetic. It doesn't attract a magnetic compass needle. FULL STOP.

But just as soon as the world starts to talk about that, suddenly, the fakes will put out fake news, aimed at the new generation, saying that the south pole does attract a compass needle. That's how they operate, with deliberated shame and scheming.

As science can't see what's going on at the atomic level of a magnet to cause repulsion and attraction, they don't know whether the north pole of a magnet is positive or negative. The magnet doesn't come with a built-in label, "north pole." Therefore, the charge at the north end of a compass needle is not known, meaning that the charge at the north pole of the earth cannot be known, whether negative or positive. However, as I can prove that earth and solar gravity is due to negative charge from freed electrons, chances are that the north pole of the earth has an abnormal amount of freed electrons in its crust. If this is correct, then the positive end of a magnet points to the north pole.

As those interior free electrons define heat, the north pole of the planet must have an unusual heat source in the crust, which can explain why the Arctic is always warmer than Antarctica by a significant amount.

So, without the existence of earth's magnetic field, solar-wind electrons do in fact enter the atmosphere, same as when a flood of water strikes the forest trees but easily enters the forest too. One can predict correctly that ALL solar electrons will collide with air atoms, but, in moving at high speed, the electrons will "plow" through air atoms, between the space between them, to a significant depth toward the ground...all happening on the sun-side of the planet, of course. But what do you suppose happens on the dark side, where solar electrons do not directly enter the atmosphere. If you answered, "it gets colder," congratulations, you are on to something: free electrons define heat.

But if you can answer the question, without my telling you first, as per where the vast accumulation of daily-entering solar electrons go, then you are on to something big, very big. In fact, the liars do not want the solar electrons to enter the atmosphere because the only way to get rid of them, from the earth, is by admitting that their cherished Newtonian gravity is their other farce. They are a bunch of farce-inventing goons, farce after farce after farce, each dead farce invented to keep the other dead farce propped up to appear as living truths.

In the meantime, as the solar electrons enter, the earth's gravity REPELs them, such that they have a limit as to how deep into the atmosphere they can arrive. You just got your big hint as to where the daily feed of electrons go so that they cannot constantly accumulate to kill the planet.

The solar electrons don't quite make it to cloud height on the sun-side, because clouds puff up on their tops, meaning that earth gravity is repelling them upward more strongly than they are plowing down toward the ground. Yes, it's true, clouds puff up on their tops because electrons are moving upward as heat. As gravity repels electrons up, they push air atoms and water molecules up.

When clouds form droplets, the water molecules, due to merging as droplets, release some captured electrons, and this can cause lightning and tornadoes (from low air pressure above clouds) when the density of the freed electrons becomes high. The more numerous the free electrons, the more cloud tops puff upward. It's well known in physics that all atomic mergers release heat, and vice versa: all liquid atoms that dislodge into gas atoms absorb heat i.e. it gets colder in the space between gas atoms. Therefore, it's known that the release of electrons from atoms is the release of heat, but the control freaks don't want to word it that way because they don't want you to know electrons as the definition of heat.

Though the solar wind can't reach the ground on its own steam, wind will spread solar electrons around, cause them to reach the ground. Heat is the known cause of wind, and so the solar-wind electrons have a built-in mechanism for getting themselves spread throughout the air all the way down into your nostrils. Your body makes them, through chemical reactions, at all times, and releases them as body heat. Chemical reactions often involve atoms merging with atoms = released electrons.

As the earth spins on its axis, the electron-filled air soon finds itself entering the dark side of the planet, where earth gravity repels many of them back into outer space. God has set up the situation such that, as many electrons that are entering by day get lost by night, for if this were not so, the earth would either get progressively hotter, with time, or colder.

The fact seems to be that the sun provides a SURPLUS of electrons not needed for more than one 24-hour period. This surplus would fry the planet if there were no mechanism in place to get rid of the surplus, and that mechanism is partially the night time, assuring that the surplus vanishes once in every 24-hour period.

Now you know why evolutionist imposters don't want you to know that solar electrons are constantly entering the air, because one of the only two ways to get rid of their surplus is by earth gravity, and, thus, the true nature of gravity becomes apparent. This true definition of gravity does not dress the big bang very well. Instead, it provides its coffin.

I should add that solar heat is not only from the entry of electrons into the air, but also from the sun's light, which is "radiant heat." The reason that the goofs don't want you to believe in solar-wind electrons in the air is two-fold, one to deny that they define atmospheric heat, and two: to deny you the fact that light travels across them as a literal wave, similar to sound waves across atoms.

The reason that light waves are much faster than sound waves is that atoms are either held down by gravity when they form gases, or are in bondage to each other when in the liquid or solid states. It takes work for a wave to move across those atoms, and work slows the speed of the wave. The more work involved, the slower the wave, I assume, but waves across free electrons have no work to do. Can you see why not?

Atoms in contact with each other are under attraction to each other, and the sound wave needs to act against that attraction. Sound can carry as a wave only if atoms jolt, and a jolt is defined as breaking away a little from the atomic attraction. But free electrons are not bonded to each other, and are neither held down by gravity. A sound wave through the air needs to jolt atoms against the downward pull of gravity. It takes some WORK. The sound wave fast becomes weaker with distance, due to this work.

It's the attraction forces of atoms that cause gas atoms to form liquids in the first place, and all gas atoms can form liquids, but only if something forces them to make contact, otherwise, when at a distance from each other as gas atoms, ALL atoms repel each other, which defines gas pressure. Inter-attraction of atoms can only form when atoms make contact, because it's only then that the protonic core of each atom can attract the captured electrons of one or more neighboring atoms.

Atomic attraction causes friction when anything comes against merged atoms. The physical force from anything is weakened / reduced due to the attraction between atoms. Every force that attempts to unmerge atoms is physical energy lost in the process. But there is almost zero friction amid the motion of free electrons in air, not only because they are not in physical contact with each other, and not only because they repel each other. Free electrons have the best "grease", their inter-repulsion forces.

Air atoms, thanks to being pulled by gravity, have a minute amount of friction; if it were not so, birds and insects could not fly. Flight by animal wings requires that work be done when flapping/moving air atoms away. Air atoms repel each other, as do electrons, but air atoms are held down by gravity, and that alone is what gives air some viscosity = friction such that everything going through it needs to do work. But, in a vacuum having only free electrons, nothing can fly.

Free electrons in air suffer some frictional force because they are trapped in a sea of air atoms, but the friction level is far less than you would imagine when viewing air atoms as solid balls, with solid outer edges. Atoms do not have solid outer edges. Instead, the outer edges of all atoms are quasi-free electrons barely captured by their respective protons, and hence, when free electrons strike atoms, for example due to wind, they roll off with minimal friction involved. If you think electrons orbit protons, slap yourself out of it.

Free electrons collide with air atoms even when the air is perfectly still at night, for the electrons are then propelled UPWARD from the repulsion of the heat source within the planet, which is the gravity source. Electrons repel electrons, and so they worm their way between air atoms, striking them on their undersides from time to time, and eventually fly off into outer space. They would do this even if there was not earth gravity repelling them, for in repelling each other, they tend to move as far as possible from each other. But they would not fly off fast enough, apart from gravity, to keep the planet from getting hotter day after day. God has set the particulars of this situation just right so that the maximum heat loss at night keeps the average planetary temperature where we find now, or, a little warmer previous to the Flood.

LOOK IT. Everyone knows electrons repel electrons. Every physicist knows that electrons are at every heat source. Therefore, the stupids who pretend to be super-intelligent know that there is a vast source of free electrons in the earth's molten rocks. Therefore, if even you can now say that this vast source of heat is predicted to repel atmospheric electrons into space, why do you think the stupids act blind to that simple conclusion? Because, they are ugly, evolutionist imposters, not scientists, but "drug handlers" who keep you stoned on false physics. The more stoned they can get you, the less likely you'll be able to see the realities before your very noses. You are hallucinating when you see electrons whizzing around atoms at the near speed of light. Snap out of it, get sober.

The big bang, in order to form stars, needs gravity defined as a little atomic attraction existing in every atom...by which ALL gas atoms have a little attraction to one another, from a distance. TRASH. It's not true. You are being fed an hallucination. Gas atoms can either net-repel, or net-attract, you can't have hydrogen atoms doing both. As your inflated tires hold up your car's weight, air atoms inter-repel. ALL gas atoms cause gas pressure, and that's from their inter-repulsion. Therefore, as all gas atoms repel each other, hydrogen atoms from a theoretical big-bang explosion could NOT have attracted one another to form stars. Therefore, the magicians invented Newtonian gravity, where each atom magically comes with attraction toward all other atoms that is NOT from electromagnetic attraction.

Ya-but, this attraction cannot be found in experiments, though the magicians have led you to think that some experiments prove atomic gravity force. Besides, the repulsion forces between hydrogen gas atoms are a zillion times stronger than whatever atomic gravity force has been "found" in experiments. Once again: hydrogen atoms from the big-bang explosion could not possibly have attracted each other, especially as gas pressure = repulsion force increases with higher temperatures. Last I heard, the big bang was HOT-HOT-HOT. You are hallucinating when envisioning screeching (super fast and hot) H atoms coming together to form proto-stars.

And now you know why the evolutionist fools did not define gravity as an electromagnetic charge, not because they proved it wasn't, but because they WANTED a built-in attraction between all gas atoms. FOOLS. Choosing what they want as science laws, merely to keep the big-bang viable, is NOT SCIENCE. They need to be kicked out of the schools. Hail Creation Science. Make the students sober again by first making the parents sober again.

In outer space, where there is no air, and thus no restriction to the flow of free electrons, light speed through those electrons may be instant, faster than 186,000 mps. As said a couple of updates ago, light-speed experiments are tainted, meaning that light travels faster than 186,000 miles per second. The experiments are tainted because light, when bouncing out of a mirror, must first slow down a little, for light entering the mirror's atoms must first come to a stop within the atoms, then bounce back in the opposite direction. That takes time, thus affecting the math that finds the speed of 186,000 mph. For, speed is found by: velocity divided by time. That little bounce in and out of a mirror makes it appear that light is slower than it really is. Sorry, goofballs, liars, you lose. You lied to the people by not pointing out this obvious thing. You wanted light to be slower than instant because instant light helps the Creationists. Right? Right.

Evolutionists don't want instant light speed because they then have no argument against light travelling millions of light years instantly. It wrecks their claim that stars must be millions / billions of years old. It's their prime argument against God's creation of the universe in six days. If light is almost instant in space, then they have wrongly calculated the distance of a light year. It's no longer true that light travels some six trillion miles in one year, but much, much further. Besides, the fools have grossly exaggerated the distances to the stars because it befits their murder of Creationism.

Light-Wave Mechanics

Let me show you how a light wave works, similar to a normal flow but not quite the same. A train "flows" down the tracks. "Flow" is hereby defined as moving along. A light wave is a short flow that stops flowing almost instantly because it's hitting a target. The wave is the start of a flow, but cut short as soon as the last free electron, in a light-wave line, strikes an atomic material.

A light wave, though moving along much-more straight than a sound wave, is not innately perfectly straight. However, when countless light waves are flowing simultaneously in all directions, for example between a light bulb and everything in the room, each wave trains the other wave to move straight ahead. Each wave prevents the neighboring wave from deviating from a straight line outward to the targets. Only when light passes an edge of an object can the wave deviate a little from the straight-line course, into the shadow of the object passed. That's why the slit experiment reveals that light does bend a little when passing the slits.

A light wave can be viewed as a train perfectly straight. The first electron at the light bulb pushes the train of hooked-up cars, but it can't run because the last car in the train hits the book on the table, or the table, or whatever. The last car in the train thus jolts one atom of the book, or whatever, which can be viewed as one quanta of light, though not as the stupids define "quanta." It results in radiant heat, when the last car in the train enters the atom by a light-wave jolt. It's not the electron emitted at the bulb that enters the book's atom, but the stupids expect you to believe it when they define light as a photon shot out from the bulb. STUPIDS. They were made stupid by the denial of evolutionists of the solar-wind aether that fills earth's atmosphere. They need to protest against the establishment, wouldn't that be fun to watch?

If the stupids had reasoned properly, they would have realized that the countless electrons emitting at the bulb push countless trains of electrons INSTANTLY into every strike-able atom in the room. That's because the trains are all existing even before the light bulb is turned on. If we had to wait for the electron at the bulb to reach the book, it would take some considerable time i.e. not instant. The aether is a sea of electrons that provides on-the-ready trains extending in every-conceivable direction.

Trains cut across trains. In whatever direction the electron goes at the light source, that's the direction of its train. One active train can cut across another active train. Therefore, your flashlight's light-wave trains can shine through / across the light wave trains from the light bulbs on the outer wall of your house. A dozen candles on your birthday cake create innumerable trains all cutting across each other...because God is a genius.

So, the reality is not a photon travelling at 186,000 mps from bulb to book, but rather it's built-in trains striking the book as though faster than 186,000 mps.

The goofs say that electrical flow is slightly less than 186,000 mps. Only an absolute buffoon thinks that electrons in metal wires travel THROUGH metal atoms at nearly that speed. Like, um, when you flick the light switch on, they travel through atoms at that speed, but then come to a FULL STOP (???), as soon as the light switch is turned off. What a bunch of morons. How do electrons stop so suddenly? Do they have brakes or parachutes? If they are freely flying through the VAST SPACES within atoms, which spaces the goofs wrongly imagine, what brings electrons to an instant stop?

Besides, it is not true that atoms are more than 99-percent space, only an absolute moron teaches that to the world. Farce upon farce to prop up false farces, it's not flattery or respect they deserve.

Bare protons, which do not exist in nature, will attract available free electrons only until the very outer electrons are held by as much protonic force as the inner electrons are repelling them outward (though gravity plays a role in repelling them too). Once the outer layer of captured electrons is balanced by equal attraction-verses-repulsion force, it means that the outer layer of atoms is net-neutral, unable to attract more electrons. As you can glean, the specific strength of protonic attraction determines the size of the atom when fully dressed with an electron atmosphere.

There are no proton clusters as the goofs imagine, for protons repel each other, duh. Not all protons are identical, but there are over a 100 different types (one each per element) each with their own positive-force levels. The stronger the proton, the larger the atom will be.

With the outer layers of atoms keeping their captured electrons in balance between attraction-versus repulsion, they are barely hanging on to the proton. Outer electrons, and to some unknown depth into the atom, hover in space, for while the proton attracts them inward to itself, the captured electrons repel each other outward such they they are denied physical contact with each other. They are in "contact" only by their mutual repulsion forces, and this situation amounts to near-zero friction, when anything attempts to move them. So, if an electron grazes an atom on its edge (as opposed to striking dead-on), it will sail through the captured electrons easily, moving them aside easily.

The deeper into the atom from the outer layer, the greater the friction when trying to move the electrons, for example by electricity flow, which is a literal flow of electrons. For, the closer the electrons to the proton, the more strongly they are held by it. It will take more work to move the deeper electrons. Therefore, electrical flow is a literal flow of captured electrons across the edges / peripheries of atoms. Electrical flow takes the easiest route available, on the very outer edges of atoms where friction is eased.

Most atoms do not allow electrical flow, not because their outer electrons are held too tightly to allow flow, but, I reason, because they have the "wrong" shapes to allow electrical flow. If the outer electrons of one atom are pushed ahead into the center region of a neighboring the atom, rather than pushed ahead such that they graze an outer edge, it could stifle atom-to-atom flow. For example, spherical atoms that are not merged deeply would not allow flow from atom edge to atom edge, but would push electrons into the central regions of atoms, creating chaos rather than an atom-to-atom "river."

As soon as one flips on an electrical switch, captured electrons move, atom-to-atom, toward the light bulb. They transfer, atom-to-atom, what else? There is no other option. Duh. The atoms do not move. They are locked into position. Only the electrons flow, literally like water in a water hose. But the electrons do not move toward the light bulb at anywhere near the speed of light; only a moronic physicist teaches this, who isn't really thinking. They are simply believing what they were brainwashed to believe and teach. Brainwashing and educating are similar processes, but brainwashing involves misleading tricks. "Brainwashing" is brain fooling.

If the water hose is full of water, water will start coming out the end of the hose as soon as the tap is turned on 50 feet away. Let's say that, due to friction in the hose, water starts coming out the hose one-millionth of a second after the tap is turned on. Nobody in their right mind is going to say that water travelled 50 feet in one-millionth of a second. Instead, water travels an atomic diameter in a millionth of a second, from the last water atom in the hose, out the hose end. Water is already at the hose end, no need to wait for water at the tap to arrive to the hose outlet.

Electricity works in the same way, wherefore a physicist is brainfooled to think that it travels at nearly the speed of light. I don't care if the electrical wire is 100 miles long, it's filled with trains of electrons before the electricity is turned on, and the last train cars in the wire start pouring into an electrical tool, regardless of how fast or slow the electron flow is, the instant the power is turned on. There's no need to wait for the electrons in the switch to arrive to a light bulb before the bulb shines.

Ditto for light waves. They travel through the free electrons in your room. As soon as they start emitting from the filament in the light bulb, there are already free electrons at your eye. No need to wait for the electrons at the filament to arrive to your eye, they start coming into your eye the instant the electrons at the filament push the train of electrons that includes the one right beside your eye.

However, the light wave from a light bulb is not a literal flow of electrons in the way water flows from tap to outlet. Electrons emitting from the light source are repelled upward by gravity, and do not flow toward the light targets along the light-wave lines. On the other hand, electrons emitted from the sun do flow in conjunction with light waves in the same directions, for solar gravity repels electrons in the same directions as the waves are going out. Light from the sun is therefore like water through a hose, with both the water waves and water molecules travelling in the same direction. The light wave acts as if (though not literally) travelling at more than 186,000 mps, but the flow of solar electrons is much slower.

Light waves go out in all directions from the light source, and as each wave essentially has equal force in the forward direction, they all keep one another going in straight lines. There's not one wave with more sideways force to shift any wave to the right or to the left. They all TRAIN straight. If they did not go in straight lines, they create a foggy appearance, like when light goes through foggy, semi-transparent plastic. Due to being re-directed by the plastic atoms, the light waves don't go in straight lines, thus distorting the picture when the light has exited the opposite side of the plastic.

If light were from photons penetrating glass, zikers, they would strike zillions of glass atoms and not go straight though. There is no way for straight-shooting photon particles to avoid striking atoms when attempting to penetrate glass. You can prove this by the very fact that most materials do not allow light to pass through. That's because the atoms disallow it like a concrete wall to a tennis ball. If light were a straight-shooting photon that had to avoid glass atoms, light could never be crisp-and-clear out the other side of a glass pane. Therefore, the stupids, the brainfooled, rather than discard the photon by which they were brainwashed, decided that glass is more than 99-percent space...as if this allows photons to penetrate straight. IT DOES NOT, but it's a trick made for brainfooling. Even with 99-percent less glass atoms, the remainder are sufficient in numbers to be a concrete wall to photons, expected to bounce as many photons backward out the glass as those allowed chaotically forward through the glass.

That's how you can know that light through transparent materials is a literal light wave across the outer electrons of their atoms. For a reason(s), transparent materials allow waves to go in straight lines, atom-to-atom. I can only give this for the reason: because God is a genius. Give credit to Where credit is due, evolutionist finks, or pay the eternal price. Admit that you have been a fink and an utter fool, and work to receive the grace of God first by acknowledging Jesus. I'm not going to beg you to save your soul if you don't care for it. The time for making the right choice will soon be over. Fear God.

I suggest that light can penetrate glass at absolute zero temperature. The latter is wrongly defined by physics establishments. In reality, absolute zero is when there are zero free electrons, both in the atomic spaces of materials, and in space outside of materials. Light cannot penetrate a space having no free electrons, and so it cannot penetrate a space at absolute zero.

However, the goofs tell us the following at a google offering: "Absolute zero represents the lowest possible temperature, where molecular motion [their definition of heat] is at its minimum. However, light, composed of photons, does not have mass and travels without needing a medium, so it's not directly affected by temperature in the same way matter is. A light source, like a flashlight, could still emit light at absolute zero if it had the necessary energy."

There you see the physics establishment speaking its theories as though they were the truths. A photon, they say, has no problem flying through a vacuum regardless of its temperature. And that's correct, the only problem being that there are no photons. But what I want to know is what has been found in actual experiments at near-absolute zero. Can light penetrate such a vacuum or not? No gas can exist at absolute zero. That temperature necessitates a vacuum.

The quote above implies that light has been found incapable of travel through absolute zero, but it plays a trick, blaming it on the breakdown of the flashlight battery. No, it's because light needs a wave medium, and that medium is heat. There's no end to playing tricks in farceland science. Put the flashlight outside of a container having vacuum at absolute zero. It'll work fine, but its light won't go through the vacuum.

Light is not electromagnetic energy. They are playing a trick on your brain again. Light is the PHYSICAL energy of an emitting electron transferred, free electron to free electron, to a target. The magnetism between electrons is NOT the reason for the appearance of light. Light is seen when the electrons jolt physically inside your eyes. They invented "electromagnetic energy" as part of their photon-wave duality. google's AI says: "Light is electromagnetic because it's a form of electromagnetic radiation, specifically a type of wave composed of oscillating electric and magnetic fields. These fields are at right angles to each other and to the direction of the wave's movement." If you understand that, you are a lunatic.

The light wave is an effect, not the literal flow. Like if you hit one end of a chisel with a "flowing" hammer, the opposite end of the chisel effects the rock instantly with the hit, even though the hammer would take some time to reach the rock (if the chisel were not in the way). The effect of the light wave goes much further, per second, than the flow of electrons out of the light source. Same as when you hit a drum with a drumstick, the sound wave "moves" much faster than the drumstick. There's two things happening, the strike, and the wave from the strike. A stone strikes water, a wave goes out. The wave carries the strike to a distance. The strike energy transfers from A to B in all directions possible, and lands on atomic things, pushing them. A wave is extended PHYSICAL force. There's no lunacy in this explanation, no imaginary, magneto-electro-thingies travelling at right angles to each other, no burning your brain to a crisp.

In a light wave: as soon as the emitting electron moves toward the next electron in the line, the second one starts to move thanks to the repulsion forces between them. Free electrons are always under stress of their mutual repulsion forces. They are always seeking to get away from each other such that, if one moves toward another, the latter starts to move instantly, because they are in "contact."

Only when a small sequence of free electrons (existing between two atoms) strikes an air atom does the light wave receive some backlash. BUT, not much, for the outer electrons upon atoms are almost free electrons themselves, barely held to the proton. Therefore, when an atoms gets struck on its lit half by a multitude of light waves at any given instant, the waves continue around the periphery of the atom and issue out its non-lit half. This is what makes air atoms "transparent." The light wave maintains straightness by circling each atom, then issuing out the atom at the direct-opposite end from the center of the lit half. The waves then continue in a straight line in the free-electron aether until striking another atom, and so on, the waves circle that atom too. STRAIGHT-LINE LIGHT, in spite of circling atoms. God is a genius, otherwise air would not allow me to see you clearly, or at all.

The waves do not bounce off of air atoms, aside from a small fraction, but encircle them. A photon is not capable of that because it is a projectile in a vacuum (i.e. not in a wave medium), expected to ricochet off of an atom, whether you envision my atom or the loony bird's atom of clustered protons and orbiting electrons.

Stored Photons Are For Stupid, Electron-Deniers

Where do photons come from in the light of lightning strikes? Are we to believe that photons travelling at 186,000 mps second are somehow stored upon atoms, and that they shoot out instantly as soon as a lightning bolt is formed? If not, where do the photons come from that form the light of lightning? Alas, photons do not exist, don't be stupid on stupid. Everyone should start offending and slandering evolutionist physics. It is responsible for atrocious "science," and its gurus deserve no respect. THEY ARE DETERMINED IDIOTS.

All light is formed by emitting electrons, usually emitting from atoms. I can't yet explain the mechanics of the explosion that is a lightning strike, but I know that some forceful thing jolts some electrons out of air and/or water molecules to form the light of lightning. I can therefore predict that there can be no lightning in a vacuum. And it's true:

No, lightning as we know it, a visible discharge of electricity, cannot occur in a vacuum. Lightning in a vacuum is not possible because it depends on the ionization of gas molecules... (google offering).

Ionization of atoms, in this case, means that atoms are temporarily losing captured electrons (they instantly re-load because the air is filled with free electrons). The electric current that is the lightning jolts electrons off of the atoms. Light forms.

But the loss of electrons from atoms is not in itself expected to make noise, because emitted electrons cause light waves, not sound waves. I suppose it's logical that thunder forms when water molecules are split apart, by lightning's current, into separate O and H atoms that then EXPLODE (i.e. make the thunder noise) and return to water molecules. It's known that even a small spark can explosively burn hydrogen, in the presence of oxygen, such that the two turn into water as the exhaust.

I'll take a stab at the mechanism that begins the lightning bolt. When water molecules unite / bond in a cloud to form droplets, they release captured electrons without commotion. The cloud environment becomes so highly charged with negative charge that all neighboring atoms in the air see their captured electrons repelled to the far sides of atoms, the sides furthest from the highly-negative region. Therefore, the sides of the atoms more or less facing the ground acquire a surplus of captured electrons while the sides of atoms facing the cloud are left with a deficiency of captured electrons.

To put it another way, the sides of atoms facing the cloud's highly-negative region can now be considered positively charged. Electrons from within the highly-charged, electron-stacked region therefore jump to the atoms, one at a time, but super-fast from cloud to ground. It's amazing that the process goes so fast, but it's due to the highly-charged region preparing all atoms by making their one side net-positive. As soon as the electrons-in-cloud jump to the first atom, the electrons at the ground-facing side of the same atom are forced to jump to the next atom in the line, and so on until the line engages a tree or other object.

So, perhaps now we have one of the reasons for the invention of the impossible orbiting electron, said to orbit at nearly the speed of light. I suppose the dingbats needed to explain how photons could magically appear out of atoms from flames, for example, or when electrons move through a metal wire, or when electrons cause the stove element to glow. I suppose they envisioned photons magically piggy-backing on orbiting electrons at all times, and then the electrons spit them out at 186,000 mps when the electrons go under duress, when emitting from the stove element, or from a light bulb's thin wire, or from flames. NO, STUPIDS. It's the emitting electrons that cause light, when striking the aether. STUPIDS, you've made fools of yourselves.

google's AI: "In flames, photons originate from the movement and interactions of electrons within the atoms of the burning material. When atoms are heated, electrons can jump to higher energy levels (excited states). When these electrons return to their lower energy levels, they release the excess energy as photons, which are particles of light. " When they say "jump to higher energy levels," they envision electrons orbiting in higher orbits. NO, STUPIDS, don't do it. Refrain yourselves. You did wrong to reject the aether, JUST ADMIT IT. The solar wind is the aether. Einstein should have known it. He should have known that HOT solar atoms emit electrons.

When light bounces off the wall, the stupids envision photons bouncing off of electrons. The electrons are able to catch them, go into a higher orbit CLEANLY, as if a plane crash were a beautiful thing, then release the photons as if nothing happened, then go back to a lower orbit and take a break for a whole zillionth of a second, then do it all over again as soon as the next photon flies by.

Ya-but, in the case of flames, light filaments, stove elements, and lightning strikes, where no addition of photons is granted in order to allow the stupids an off-the-wall explanation, they have got to envision (an hallucination) that the electrons somehow grab photons as they come in from any direction possible, then store them into their back-packs for long periods (how long?), and, for no logical known reason, they throw them away as soon as they (the electrons) start to leave atoms by force of their inter-repulsion.

BUT STUPIDS, why not just view the emitted electrons as the "photons"? I know exactly why: because the evolutionists brainfooled their students to believe that there is no aether. The evolutionists didn't want an aether. They wanted big-bang speed instead.

Instead of logic, they picked fantasy. Instead of admitting that speedy photons striking speedy orbiting electrons will destroy atoms in the process, they chose a convenient scenario in which the electrons simply absorb photons, even if they collide HEAD-ON at fantastic speeds. To make it more credible, they assigned the photon near-zero mass, and once the population was groomed into swallowing that idea, they moved on to exactly zero mass, an impossibility.

How long can photons piggy-back on electrons? Forever. For as long as your light bulb is turned off, the photons are supposedly on the electrons. If, after a thousand years, someone flips the light switch on, voila, photons start shooting from the electrons. NOOOO, STUPIDS, DON'T DO IT. There are electrons shooting off from the filament, and physicists know it.

Asking google, "do electrons come from a filament," the response is: "Yes, electrons can be emitted from a heated filament in a process called thermionic emission." By "THERMionic," they mean that heated objects emit electrons. But, shameless creatures that they are, they never venture to tell the people that the electrons are the "photons." And that's why they insist that the solar wind doesn't engulf earth's atmosphere with free electrons, that you might not realize what's truly taking place at the atomic level in thermionic emission, and that you might not equate heat with electron material.

Infra-red LIGHT is HEAT because light emission emits heat particles, i.e. freed electrons. Heat is electron gas. It enters everything. All atoms store heat as captured electrons. Get with the program. Freely share these truths, Creationists, make stubborn and delinquent donkeys of evolutionists.

Van Allen Pools

Wikipedia: "Van Allen radiation belt is a zone of energetic charged particles, most of which originate from the solar wind, that are captured by and held around a planet..." Then, google AI: "The Earth's magnetic field lines extend from the North Pole to the South Pole, creating a magnetic field that traps charged particles." Baloney. There are no magnetic field lines even around a standard magnet, and the earth is not a magnet. There is no "field" there. Therefore, the van-Allen "belts" are formed by some other method.

The electrons that make up the belts (ignore invented, cosmic particles that do not exist in the solar wind) are not "trapped" by the magnetic field lines, as claimed, for "trapped" suggests that attractive and repulsive forces are both acting on the electrons such that they can't come closer to earth nor further from earth than where the belts exist. However, this ignores that the negative particles should be fully attracted to the positive pole, and vice-versa. How can that situation be avoided? Exactly half the solar wind moving toward the earth comes toward the northern hemisphere, and half toward the southern hemisphere. Therefore, almost half all these electrons would be receiving attraction force if the earth is made of two magnetic poles.

But it gets worse for the tricksters because, while one earth pole attracts the electrons to itself, the other earth pole repels them such that the electrons are compelled all-the-more to end up at the pole that attracts them. There is no logic in the claim that electrons should be captured in mid-space, midway between the poles of the earth magnet. But this is what the magicians would have you believe on the basis that you trust them due to their being super-capable for delivering to you the truth. It's not scientific capability that delivers truth, but honesty.

If we put an iron filing, which is thin and long, beside a long, rectangular magnet midway between its poles, one end of the filing gets attracted by one pole of the magnet by as much force as the other end of the filing gets attracted by the other end of the magnet (that's because the filing is temporarily turned, by the magnet, into a magnet itself, with two poles of its own of opposite charges). The filing is trapped midway between the two poles of the magnet, fine and dandy, but only because someone put the filing midway between the poles. But if the filing were sailing along on its own, closer to the south pole, then it would NOT get trapped midway between the poles. Therefore, the magicians are playing a trick on you, denying you the full picture.

But it gets worse for them because electrons sailing along in the solar wind are not magnets; they do not, as filings do, have both a south and north pole. They cannot therefore get trapped midway between poles. Nor can naked protons because they too are not bi-polar magnets. Case closed. You are being lied too, tricked.

The longitudinal iron filing above is positioned by the magnet parallel with the longitudinal body of the magnet because it is midway between poles. The filing is pulled by equal force to both poles, and as such the filing partakes in a small part of what is called a "field line." But this supposed magnetic field line does not exist as an entity to itself. It's just that iron filings HAPPEN to take on positions that create a curve line from one end of the magnet to the other. No invisible field lines exist apart from these filings. The magnetic field exists, but it's not shaped in lines from one end of the magnet to the other.

Only the filings create the lines according to how much they are attracted to one pole versus how much they are attracted by the other pole, itself depending on how close or far they are to either pole. The closer they are to a pole, the closer they are situated to the magnet's body. The filings furthest from the magnet body are situated exactly midway between poles. The closer the filings are to a pole, the closer they get to the magnet's body precisely because they get closer to the attraction force of the pole. There's stronger attraction there as compared to filings midway between poles. Thus, this situation, wherein filings get progressively closer to the magnet body with closeness to a pole is what creates the curvature of a line of filings.

Neither lone electrons nor lone protons in outer space can be attracted to both earth poles, even if earth did have two poles of opposite charges. CASE CLOSED. They lie with a trick. They show you field lines with iron filings and then want you to believe that solar-wind particles have exactly the same situation.

The closer the filing to one end of the magnetic, the more it points directly to that end, not because it's trapped in a magnet's field line, but because its positive end is attracted more to the magnet's negative end than the filings negative end is attracted to the magnet's positive end. But, again, electrons do not have two poles of opposite charges...meaning that solar electrons strike the atmosphere, and enter it. People can get the impression that solar electrons define solar heat, and all other heat, therefore.

Multiple curved and DISTINCT lines can be made with the filings, not because multiple magnetic lines exist there, but because the negative ends of filings repel the negative ends of filings while the positive ends of filings repel positive ends of filings. The filings repel each other across their full length, and as such they create some distance from one another, giving the illusion of multiple "field LINES."

It's not just upper air atoms that force solar-wind electrons to curve around the earth such that they accumulate in "belts." The solar electrons already filling the air repel incoming solar electrons, and so they repel them upward. The more dense the electrons in the air, the more they can repel them away into space. The denser the atmospheric electrons, the hotter the air. Therefore, the equatorial zones can repel more electrons than the arctic zones, which can easily explain why the Van-Allen belts form roughly around the equator.

They say: "...the belts are primarily centered around the geomagnetic equator." Achem, there is no magnetic equator. It's in their imagination. The electrons get deflected based on the physics of the situation. The earth spins on its axis, and thus the atmosphere spins with the earth, deflecting the electrons into the direction of the spin (eastward) more than into the opposite direction. The tilt of the planet at any given time determines how close to the geographical equator the belts will form. In our summer, the belts form more to the north of the equator, and vice-versa for winter. The "belts" should be defined as an accumulation or pool of free electrons, but "belt" is favored, I suppose, because it compliments "field lines" i.e. shaped long and thin.

Never assume that what they draw on paper, or by computer animation, is the total reality. Don't expect that everything we're taught about these belts is based on experimental facts versus what they believe by theory. And even when they cite experimental facts as evidence for their theories, they can misinterpret the realities, and often they do to the tune of becoming science lunatics.

The electrons in the pools are not captured at all. They freely sail away further into space. They get accumulated, but not due to being captured magnetically. The pools thin out because earth gravity repels electrons further out into space.

The so-called "South Atlantic Anomaly" over southern South America is where they claim the belts are closest to the earth due to a portion of the magnetic field lines being closest to the earth over South America. The correct way to interpret this, in my expectations, is that there is a high positive charge under South America that attracts solar wind electrons. However, I don't know much about this. It sounds incorrect to me that a part of the van-Allen belts hang above South America even while South American spins around daily with the earth.

As solar and earth gravity repel solar-wind electrons, earth gravity must be a negative charge from free-electron pools in the earth's crust. If the electrons are going free of atoms undergoing some normal chemical change, the earth would not become net-negative. The only way to make the earth and sun net-negative is by continual destruction (or partial-destruction) of protons that hold captured electrons. When freed from crippled protons, they melt the rocks. As positive charge decreases with their crippling, the earth becomes net-negative. Proof that protons are being destroyed/crippled is the net-negative charge that repels solar electrons many miles into the sky. One needs a colossal negative charge to accomplish that. Rubbing a stick with your hand won't do.

The earth does not progressively become more net-negative, over time, due to a continual destruction of protonic material, for if this were the case, gravity would become stronger, and things would weigh more. Rather, the freed electrons from the protons work their way through the magma / rocks and, after coming out of the ground as ground heat, they fly away into space. The heat working through, but temporarily trapped in the rocks, is thus the definition of gravity. The earth's and sun's gravity is only as strong as the destruction of protons allows at any given time. Gravity is from a "machine" cleverly devised by The Genius. Woe to His enemies, who rob Him of what belongs to Him.

The soil is known to be net-positive in that it attracts electricity, but this is due merely to ground water, or to the ingredients in water that make it conductive to electricity. Deeper down, in the crust, the earth is net-negative. If it were not, the electrons issuing from the filament of a light bulb, or the heat entering any object, would not rise upward more than going into any other direction.

Gravity causes heat to rise, face it, goofballs, it's in your face sticking its tongue out at you. There's still time for the Grace of God to come upon you, if you confess that your many goof-ups are not the way to continue, if you try to make amends to Him by sinning no more.

They call the particles of the Van-Allen belts "charged magnetic particles" in hopes that you will not dwell on their being electrons. But they are not magnetic in the sense of having two poles. They are tricking you.

NEWS

The Liberal government of canada has announced that the communist, NDP party, that normally reflects Liberal ideologies, is no longer an official party due to winning only seven seats in the last election. The NDP lost 17 seats in this election, which was alone enough to close most of the huge gap (about 24-44 percent) between Liberals and Conservations when Liberals were under trudeau. I suppose that the Liberals were trying to urge three or four NDP seats to quit NDP and flip to the Liberal party in order to give the latter a majority government. But, when the effort failed, Liberals punished the NDP. Or, by removing the political status, Liberals think that NDP seats can somehow be flipped easier.

The reality is that the NDP voters who voted Liberal this past election, to allow a Liberal win, will return to the NDP as soon as it gets a new leader, for most NDPers voted liberal partly to ruin Jagmeet Singh, the woeful NDP leader...who badly lost his own seat to Liberals. This can mean that the NDP are apt to voting with the Conservatives to force a new election, as soon as their internal polls indicate that NDP voters will come back, once the NDP gets a new, hopeful leader. In the meantime, these same NDPers will start to attack carney's government in order to maximize the numbers of NDP voters who let go of the Liberal party, in order that the NDP will became an official party again, and thus re-gain some formidable parliamentary voices/power. Therefore, in that way, the NDP could cause a Conservative government to develop in a new election.

The reason I'm painting that picture is due to my quasi-expectation, starting a few weeks that ago, that God will SLICE carney TO PIECES...or, at least, that God knows that carney will be sliced to pieces. I'm re-visiting this because I just watched the youtube channel, Northern Perspective, talking about this Liberal move to oust the NDP from official-party status, and that video claimed that this move will cut the Liberals to pieces. I can't recall the exact phrase used, and, by the way, by browser history doesn't even show that video, very suspicious. The browser is supposed to record, in my history, every webpage I load, but the one from Northern Perspective, watched some 30 minutes ago I write here, is NOT in the history. Are the Liberals censoring Northern Perspective as best they can with the help of youtube and/or other organizations? Not surprising.

I've just found the video, and the phrase is: "which could lead to Mark Carney's government ending in a death by a THOUSAND CUTS." I doubt very much that Northern Perspective has the time to read my updates even if it wanted to, and so I'm wondering whether God breathed those words to indicate to me that the NDP will cut carney to pieces, not at all to say that other factors can't contribute to it.

As evidence that God breathed "thousand cuts," it recalls a dream I had with "five thousand dollars," at which time I sought a thousand-like surname, and came to the Townsands. The latter's write-up: "In 1398, John Townshend settled at RAINham,..." Slice's are first known in Essex with Rains (share white lion with Slice's) and Rainham-like Rams. The latter, in Rain format, are in Townsand colors and format, and while English Plate's incorporate the full Townsand Coat, CUTs are showing heraldic plates! Lookie there, a thousand cuts.

Essex is where Death-related Motts/Morts are first know. DEATH BY A THOUSAND CUTS. Deaths are first known in Kent with the TONbridge's/TUNbridge's, linkable to Towns/Tune's. TOWNsands. Clare's were at Tunbridge Wells (Kent) while English Clare's are first known in Suffolk with English Towns/Tune's (Rain format), and with the Owls (Tunbridge colors and near-format) in the Slice Coat. Slice's are also Sledge's in the "sledge hammer" of English Alberts, first known in Kent with Tunbridge WELLs. Tunbridge's are in the colors of English Wells while German Wells almost have the Carne Coat. We need the latter to point "death by a thousand cuts" to mark carney.

However, Hall of Names says that the Cut plates can be alternated with "squares." Squirrels/Square's are first known in Worcestershire with SAND-branch Sandys, and with Tume's/Tombs that can be in the motto of Irish Judge's/Juge's who in turn are in Rain colors and format while sharing white scallops with TownSANDs and Plate's. Tume's are like the Tune variation of Towns, and the interesting thing is that Tume's/Tombs, having a DEATH them, use "R.I.P." on their "tombstones" in Peace/Paise colors and near-format. Peace's/Paise's are the closest I can get to "slice to pieces." Peace's/Paise's share the doves of Pansys/Pantzers, first known in Westphalia with German Wells.

English Paice's/Pace's, I now see, are no longer said to be first known in Cheshire, but now in Leicestershire with Tony's/TONE's known to share the maunch of Hastings, the latter first known in Kent with Deaths and TONbridge's. As Italian Tonys use a "flower", I must repeat that this same Tony gave Andrea, his classmate (11 years old), a jewel for her 11th birthday. Having said that, let me repeat from above:

Stands/Stains/STANs share the double fesses of Aflack-like Flags/Flacks [potential pointer to Mr. Aflaq, Baathist co-founder]. STANleys look very related to the Coat of SONNYs/Staneys in turn sharing the scallops of Rinds, in turn first known in Perthshire with Bitars/Butters [potential pointer to Mr. Bitar, Baathist co-founder]. It's very interesting that while Rinds have "gillie flowers", Julani-like Jewels/Jowells/Joels (Kent with Flowers) have "gillyflowers". A SUNNI character once calling himself Mr. Julani/JAWLANi/Jolani (various spellings online) now rules Syria.

Plus, German Joels almost have the Coat of TUNNo's/Tunnels!!!...

That's stunning because Julani had been working closely, and may still be, with Mr. Atoun.

Cuts are also Cute's while MontaCute's have a different-colors Coat version of the Hounds expected in the Cut/Cute GREYhound. Greys are first known in Northumberland with Cudds. Hounds are first known in Cambridgeshire with the Rain-branch Wrench's/Rench's (share Wren crosslets). Raines-branch Wrens have a "broken spear" while Broke's share the dart in Crest with Cuthberts and Cudds. Broke's share the Chief-Shield colors of Cutters.

Wren-beloved Broke's are first known in Essex with Brookfield-connectable Brooks, but also with Slice's/Sledge's and FITCH's/Fitts. It just so happens that while Wrens have a white lion (Rain-lion color) holding the broken spear, Slice's/Sledge's have a white lion holding a FITCHee cross. Spears/Speyers (related to Rothes on the Spey river) are first known in Wren-connectable Renfrewshire. I see the Rain lion as that of Rothes', first known in Kent with Sledge-beloved Alberts and Deaths, both using a gold griffin, itself linkable to death-themed and Griffin-like Grave's/Griefs, the latter first known in Gloucestershire with the Vile's in the Griffin and Fane/Veynes' mottoes. Fane's/Veynes', sharing the gauntlet with Wayne's (Essex with Slice's/Sledge's) are first known in Monmouthshire (beside Gloucestershire) with Howells while Owls/Howls are in the Slice/Sledge Coat.

Where TunBRIDGE's are from Towns/Tune's, they can take us to Bridge's (Somerset with MontaCUTE's), one of whom are in Slice/Sledge colors and format. These Bridge's (griffin heads) have a "Garderay" motto term while English Gards are first known in Kent with Deaths and Tunbridge Wells. English Gardners have griffin heads in the colors of the Death griffin, and the latter's griffin is colors reversed from the Gard griffins. Irish Gards share the brown wolf with Teague's/Teegers while Tigers are first known in Sussex with Owls/Howls in the owl of TEGERts/TagGARDs. Teague's/Teegers are first known in Galway while Galways have a bridge. Gards (Kent with wolf-head GAUNTs) share the white tower with Howells, the latter first known in Monmouthshire with GAUNTlet-using Fane's/Veynes'.

Tunbridge's are also TonBRIGGs. Briggs and Brighams are first known in Yorkshire with the Pincs having a border-with-fitchees in the colors and format of the border-with-besants of Briggs. The latter's besants are in the Rainham Chief while TownSANDs were at Rainham. Sands are first known in Surrey with FIDDLE's while "FIDELiter" is a Brigg motto term while "FIDELe" is a motto term of Irish Gards (same place as Tunbriggs). Gard-like Garrats'/JARRATs use "Semper FIDELis" while Sempers are first known in Essex with Rains. French Jarrets share the Coat of Gardens/Jardens, the latter first known in Angus with Rainhams and Bridge-like Bride's.

I'll add that while Mosuls share the Garden/Jarden and Jarret boar head, Townsands can get us to Towns/TOUNE's, a possible pointer to Mr. Atoun of Syria in the midst of discussing a potential pointer to carney? Will the latter get mixed up in Middle-Eastern plots against Israel?

The Eagle's/Hegels in the Garden/Jarden Crest are first known in Lincolnshire with Cuts/Cute's while Hagels share the lone pile of Wings in turn in the Tume/Tomb Crest (Worcestershire with Wings). Brighams share two white wings in Crest with Tume's/Tombs, the latter first known in the same place as Sandys (essentially have the Sand Coat), tending to prove that Tume's were from the Tune variation of Towns (Rain format and colors reversed).

Towns/Tune's are in the colors and format of Peggs suspect in the Tume/Tomb "pegasus". Peggs and Watch's/Wedge's both use "wedges", and both are on Town/Tune colors and format. Then, Wedge's/Weggs (GAUNTlet) are first known in Somerset with TUNtons/Tantons, where Tintons had a location too who are once again on Town/Tune colors and format. Tintons are first known on Cornwall with the Stone's suspect in the Tume/Tomb "tombstones", and Stone's happen to share the Brigg cinquefoil while Bridge's are first known in Somerset too along with the Borders and Border-loving MontaCUTE's who in turn share the lozenges of Pincs (border looks connectable to Brigg border).

As we are getting congested with Somerset elements, let's add that Somerset is where Strongs are first known sharing the Stone eagle. Stone's are first known in Cornwall with the Wassa's/Wace's while Wedge's and Watch's are also Wage's. Tuntons/Tantons share the lozenges of Petts, first known in Kent with Wedge-beloved Gaunts and Deaths.

Wagers (Yorkshire with Briggs, Pullys and Walk-connectable Wakefields) and Pattle's (share pelican with Pullys) share the hearts of pelican-using SPROUTs while the Brigg Crest has the "stump of a tree SPROUTing." Wrens, first known in Durham with Wassa-branch Washingtons, have the "broken spear" while Spears (RENfrewshire) share the crossed spears of Sprouts. I'll suggest that the Brigg stump has the Pully pelican because Marble's/MarPULs have a griffin in the colors of the Death griffin. Plus, Pullys look related to the Coat of Gards (Kent) while English Gardners share the Death griffin too while German Gardners have the Pully scallop in colors reversed.

Somerset's Bridge's love the Crabs, first known in Cambridgeshire with the Chapmans/Chepmans while Cheppe's are in the write-up of Chips/Chipmans, the latter first known in Worcestershire with Tume's/Tombs. Chapmans/Chepmans share the full motto of Slate's while Slice's are also Sleights. The Sallett variation of Sales' can apply to Slate's because Salletts/Sales' are in Cut colors and format. I trace Salletts/Sales' to Saluzzo's, the line to Swallows, first known in Lincolnshire with Cuts.

Having said all of that, we can get another, death-by-a-thousand-cut pointer to mark carney where French Carne's share Arden and Brigg cinquefoil, for Ardens are in the Pett motto, and we just saw Petts sharing the lozenges of TUNtons. Petts are first known in Kent with Petits, and the latter share the carney lion. Briggs ("FORTiter") share the pelican with Welsh Carne's, and the all-important Townsands incorporate the Coat of Pilate-like Plate's (Lancashire with Forts). Pilate's/Pilotte's, sharing the Carney pheon, are first known in Burgundy with French Petits. Pellicans share the Howell tower while Slice's love Owls/Howls. Death by a thousand slices. Even the two, main state media (CBC and CTV) are cutting carney up in multiple ways this past week.

Carnagys (Angus with Rainhams) share the blue eagle with Teasels who in turn share the crescents of Motts/MORTs (Essex with Rains, Teasels and Slice's) who in turn share the Death crescents. See that?

The stress on Tume's above reminds of my miracle-marble shot against the marble, or alley, of TONY. We were 11 years old at the time, though I may have just turned 12, the year of my playing organized hockey with Steve Tarr. We even crossed Marble's above because they share the Death griffin, and Tume's are also Tombs with a death theme. I flicked the marble/alley (while sitting on my index finger) with my Tume-like thumb, and hit Tony's marble from at least six feet away, maybe ten, as it sat on the GRASS. Tume's are first known in the same place as Alleys (share Grasse lion) who in turn share the Coat of Atlas'/Atleys, the latter first known in Kent with Deaths.

Now see this from the Death write-up: "The Death family originally lived in the town of Ath in Belgium..." It recalls the Athels suspect with Aflacks/ATHleks. Note ATleys, though houseofnames doesn't list ATHleys. Still, Atleys are first known in Kent with Deaths/Dearths and Alley-like Ailes'/Aylles'. The latter's Coat is almost the one of ATHELs! That's incredible, suggesting that the miracle-marble shot points to carney's demise by the fingers of God, for I literally bowed my head to pray to make the shot, and it hit Tony's marble dead-on, not merely a nick. Tony's/Tone's can take us to Towns/Tune's and therefore to thousand-like Townsands.

Repeat from above: "Chapmans/Chepmans share the full motto of Slate's while Slice's are also Sleights. The Sallett variation of Sales' can apply to Slate's because Salletts/Sales' are in Cut colors and format. I trace Salletts/Sales' to Saluzzo's, the line to Swallows, first known in Lincolnshire with Cuts." Saluzzo's share the Coats of Dure's and Cluns, the latter two first known in Perthshire with Alley-connectable Athels!!! Atha's/Atteys (Cambridgeshire with Wrench's) share the white lion in Crest with Rain- / Wrench-branch Wrens.

Alleys and Atleys share the giant lion of Rita's who in turn use "PIECES of wood" while Woods are first known in Leicestershire with Tonys/Tone's. The latter love the Clubs/Clobbes', in SLICE colors and format. SLICE TO PIECES. In fact, Clubs/Clobbes' are first known at Farndon (Cheshire with Clubs/Clobbes), and Farndons almost have the Coat of PAICE's/Pace's, the latter once said to be first known in Cheshire, but now said to be first known in Leicestershire!!! Italian Paice's/Pace's/Pasi's/PASCELs were a Spear / Sprout branch while Pass'/Pascels are first known in Essex with Slice's. So, yes, it seems that God breathed "slice to pieces" out of me because the two terms are heraldically connectable.

Woods love the Sava's/Savage's who happen to have the Eagle/Hegel Coat in colors reversed while Eagle's/Hegels (share Wren / Rain lion) are first known in Lincolnshire with Swallows. Woods share the fitchees of Picks/Pix's, first known in Kent with their Root kin, and with TUNbridge while Root-branch Roets are first known in Somerset with Bridge's. TunBRIDGE.

But there's more. Slate's share the Coat of Blundville's, first known in Cheshire with Marble's and Salletts/Sales'. Slice's/Sleights love the Owls, first known in Suffolk with Blonds/Blunds and Blondville's (share Marble fitchees in colors reversed). The six Blondville fitchees are in the pattern of the Arundel "swallows". FitzAlans of Arundel married Alice of Saluzzo, the line to Alis'/Alice's while Alleys are also Alleys'. The six Blondville fitchees are shared in the same pattern by Hillarys, first known in the same place as Alleys!

Alis'/Alice's put a "muzzle" on their bear head, and Meschin-branch Mussel's/Muscels, sharing the Cut/Cute plates, are first known in Lincolnshire with Cuts/Cute's, and with Grasse's sharing the Alleys lion. The mother of Alice of Saluzzo (Piedmont with Masci's) was Luis, and Lois' are in Alley/Alleys colors and format. Sallets/Sales' are in Cut/Cute colors and format. Meschins (Cheshire with Sale's/Sallets) married Alis Skipton of Rumilly, and Skiptons share the purple lion with Wrens while Wrench's are first known in Cambridgeshire with Rumillys.

My mother is a Masci on her mother's side, and the miracle-alley shot was on her grass on HULLmar drive (Toronto). Hulls share the Coat, roughly of Halls/Hole's, the latter first known in Lincolnshire too, and while Hulls are in Rain colors and format, the Mars in "HullMAR" share the scallops of Townsends of Rainham. Halls call the Hull "dog's heads" "talbots" while Lucy Taillebois of Lincolnshire married earl Meschin, and with Cuts/Cute's. Meschins are first known in Shropshire with Talbots and Hope's while Rainhams share the Hope besants. Talbots have the Coat of Cut-connectable Greys in colors reversed.

I FLICKed the alley with my thumb, and Flicks, first known in Norfolk with Hollys who in turn share the Hall/Hole dog, share the Meschin scallops. Tony and I were playing the alleys game of "potsies," which needs a HOLE in the ground as the pot. Italian Tony's use a "flower" while Flowers share the Potter cinquefoil. The Flower Coat is in colors reversed with Dovers, the latter first known in Kent with Tony-related Hastings, with Deaths in Potter colors, and with Cutter-beloved Dragons/Drainers in Potter colors and format.

Thus, death by a thousand cuts is being pointed to in multiple ways by the alley shot...which took place in 1968, soon after Pierre Trudeau's first day as prime minister on April 20 of 1968. We moved from Hullmar in the summer of 1968 (some weeks before school started in September), and it's doubtful we were playing alleys as early as April, but possible. Trudeau's may have been a branch of the Trude variation of Alis-beloved Truths. I PRAYed to make the alley shot, and while Irish Prays share the six Truth/Trude pale bars, English Prays are first known in Lincolnshire with Cuts, Halls, et-al.

Allisons, because they share the Hull / Hall dog, can be gleaned as an Alis/Alice branch. The Truths in the Allison motto, as well as in the English-version motto of Alis'/Alice's, are first known in Surrey with SALEmans (Bland colors and format) and Townsand-connectable Sands. Saleman-branch Salmons are first known in Cumberland with the Quints in turn sharing the Blondville Chief, both sharing the vair fur of Briggs. The latter share the cinquefoil of McBride's, first known in Arran with the McCabe's sharing the "salmon" of Hams while Hammers (Sussex with same-colored Hams) love the Dolphins/DOLfins (Cumberland, early in Surrey). Cumberland is also where Browns/Bruns are first known sharing the brown lion with Blands of Kippax (Yorkshire with Briggs and BrigHAMs). Briggs love the Sprouts while "Sperate" is a Bland motto term. The Rite's suspect in the "virite" motto term of Blands are first known in Sussex with Hams and Packs. Slice's are Sledge's too while Alberts have a "sledge hammer." Pound away, Alberta, expose carney's corruption. Hams and Hammers are in Peace/Paise colors. Note "KipPAX," for Packs (Sussex with Keeps) share the anchor of PAISleys (RENfrewshire with Spears).

"SpeRATE" (of Blands) can take to Rate's/Rats suspect with Ratcliffs, kin of Tipps/Tippins sharing the Bland pheons. It reminds me that Mr. Kepke, when I was his buddy, had a white rat for a pet. Kippax's are listed with Keppochs. Rate's/Rats happen to share the Wood fitchees, and it was shown above how Woods connect with "slice to pieces."

"SPERate" is translated, "Hope," and Hope's, first known in Shropshire with Saluzzo-like Sallows, share the RainHAM besants. As thousand-like Townsands were at Rainham, let's add that Sallow-like Slows share the Death / Mort/Mott crescents! SLOW death by a thousand cuts. Morts/Motts, who named Motte-Henry at Rennes, are first known in Essex with Rains and Slice's.

And OOOOH, I almost forgot it: Rains are also Raines' while Reines' have the Coat of pieces-like Pisa's in colors reversed! Reins/Reno's share the triple MontaCUTE lozenges! Reines' love the Comets, first known in Limousin with French Clairs while Clare's were at Tunbridge Wells with their Meschin kin. Then, Mosca's, first known in Pisa, apparently have the leopard of French Clairs (in colors reversed) who in turn share triple besants in their Chief with Rainhams! Sliced to pisa. The Clair besants are in the colors of the Reines "comet." German Besants use the "club" while Paice's/Pace's are linkable to the Farndon of Clubs/Clobbes'.

Spears are first known in RENfrewshire. DOLfins, in Dol colors, trace to Dol, near Rennes. DolFINs may have been a Dol-line merger with Fiens/Finis' (Kent with English Gards, Gore's, and Pear-loving Masons), sharing the brown wolf with Irish Gards. Gore's share the Wren and Wrench crosslets. Hope's named Hope in Derbyshire, and while Wrench's were at HaddenHAM, Haddens are first known in Derbyshire. Haddens share the motto of Haldans, first known in Renfrewshire.

On Thursday evening, I caught wind of a HoneyCUTT/HonyCOTT surname, first known in Somerset with MontaCute's. The latter happen to share the black border of Parrs while Hone's and Honeys share the double Parr fesses. Hone's are even first known in Hampshire with Parry-branch Perrys.

The Honeycutts/HonyCOTTs have the Orange Coat in colors reversed, and then Cotters are first known in Oxfordshire with Peare's, and with the Bee's in the Honey Crest. Oxfordshire is near the first-known Orange's of Buckinghamshire, and near also the first-known Horns in the giant HUNTing horns of Honeycutts/HUNcote's and Orange's. The strings of both hunting horns look like bees as viewed from the back or front. Horns are first known in Middlesex with the Bruns who in turn share the Coat of Orange-like Range's.

Orange's are in the colors and format of the Evetts in the "evetts" (shown as lizards) of Cottars. Evetts have a giant patee cross while Pattys are first known in Worcestershire with Honeys, and with the Wings in the Crest of Evett-like Vetts/Fetters. Wings were once said to be first known in Perthshire with Evetts, and Dogs.

The HUNcote variation of HoneyCUTTs recalls the greyHOUND of Cutts, for Huns/Hundts use a giant greyhound. Plus, Greys are first known in Northumberland with Horn-branch Herons. The Hungate variation of English Huns looks like "Huncote." Greys have the Talbot Coat in colors reversed, and Huns/Hungate's (Dog colors and format) have the "talbot" dog in white, the color of the Cutt greyhound. What's thus got to do with a pointer to cutting carney to pieces?

The brother of Attila the Hun, Bleda, probably named Bled because Attila attacked up that way. "Athel" and "Atheling" is like "Attila," and while MUNDzuk was Attila's father, Munds/Munts are first known in Kent with Athel-connectable Ailes'. Bleds have the Clare Coat in colors reversed while Clare's were at Kent's Tunbridge Wells.

Bled is on the direct, east side of where I've seen the Carni stamped on a map. They named Carniola, and Bled is in Carniola. The HuneyCUTTs/HUNcote's took us here. Lesce is beside Bled, and Leslie's were Hungarians. Attila was stationed for a time at what would become the Hungarian capital. Czech Hungars/Ungers share the Hun/Hundt Coat, and German Hungars share the giant Grey lion. The Jeune's in the motto of Young(er)s (Essex with Angers) are first known in Cambridgeshire with Hounds and Range-like Wrench's/Rench's while German Rench's almost have the German Unger Coat. Hone's are first known in Hampshire with Anger-branch Hangers. The Jore's/Gore's (greyhound heads) could be in the Young(er) motto while Gore's/Core's share the Wren and Wrench/Rench crosslets.

In this picture, Anjou of Angers looks Hunick. The Fulk counts of Anjou are to the Fulke's, first known in Norfolk with the Flags in the German Hungar Coat, and with Rainham of the Townsands.

.

NEWS

Here's good evidence that the Liberal government was hiding opposition news channels during the election, but I see it happening now too:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1ktZQht0XI

The above looks like the start of the carney's government murder of successful, opposition podcasters, making these podcasters appear fiendish when they do the same as the CBC, only with far less money and, usually, without the fine suits and salon hair. The CBC asked youtube to destroy the youtube channel, Real Talk Politiks, which is not a channel I'm familiar with, and I peruse canadian news virtually every day as part of my time-off relaxation or risky "entertainment." Therefore, youtube and/or canada committed a constitutional crime against this channel. I don't know what that channel is like because I don't remember watching it even once. This channel needs to take the CBC to court for loss of income for no good reason (though I'm saying that blindly, without familiarity with the show).

The long-term effect of this stab against Real Talk Politiks is to rein in the methods and comments of other podcasters, to make them more politically lame for fear of being ruined financially by youtube, same as when youtube forbade podcasters to tell that vaccines were killing people, or forbidding them to use the "election fraud" phrase. If you don't see many election-fraud news stories, that's exactly why. Censorship and election fraud, cheating, is how the anti-Christs aim to get back absolute, pseudo-democratic (= dictatorial) powers going forward.

The more Trump acts the hypocrite to his voters, the more likely the Conservative party will have fewer turn-out in the next election, the higher the chances that the American anti-Christs will be back in the White House. Don't think for a minute that all's well with Trump in power. However, this move by the CBC will make more enemies, and invigorate its enemies more. Every action in politics has a reaction, every stab has a stab in return, which is why perusing political news is a mix of drinking a cocktail and poison.

Trump's party is fighting Europe's dictatorial attitudes that have never been as bad as they are now. At least, he's giving appearances of it, which, for the short-term, seems good. Like I said, stab for stab, a cocktail one day, poison the next. The irony is that Trump showed no shame or concern helping to elect the carney dictator, begging whether his voters take him seriously on his fight against European censorship.

It is shameful in God's view for Trump to support Americans at the direct expense of his/their neighbors, for it breaks the second-most important commandment, love your neighbors, do good to them as you would do good for yourself. When Trump supports the devil for canada, he sins grossly, especially when he has further evil intentions in the first place for supporting him. If the False Prophet turns out to be a Western leader promoting a Western 666 system, I expect carney to be on his side when they FORCE an anti-Christ system. I watch the news in hopes of identifying the False Prophet and anti-Christ before the churches generally know it.

It's been my estimation that the 666 purchasing system will be advanced by banks to eliminate cash and checks. How much sense does it make for the hated central bankers to turn against the people with a wicked system? carney's a central-bank man. canada has shown GLADLY (like a desired threat) that big banks are willing to freeze bank accounts of those who merely protest in strong numbers for merely embarrassing and exposing the government's over-reach. What comes after that?

Good news. I oven-treated white flour years ago, at about 200 F degrees, and put it in plastic jars that once held peanuts. These jars may not have been perfectly air-tight, but the flour is dry and purified on living things. The jars have the date of April, 2021, which is either the best-by date, or the time when the flour was jarred. I used a jar this past week for bread, and it was fine, no bad taste. It is very important that flour can be stored for more than 3.5 years. I will try another jar next year. It looks good, feels good, smells good, as if brand new.

To fight the 666, plan on storing flour in large buckets. While I put the flour in an oven for an hour or so, I wasn't able to put the plastic containers in the oven to sterilize them, because they start to melt and deform. But, even so, by placing sterilized flour into cold plastic jars, it works.

In canada, the government is still vying to kill 400 healthy ostriches because they pose a threat against mRNA vaccines. The reason that it hasn't happened yet is due to some (not many) protesters at the ostrich farm, and the podcasters who are rightly tarnishing / exposing the government on this story. Then, the WHO's "treaty" with many nations (U.S. not included) to force lockdowns and such is slated to become law in about one year. Vaccine passes into stores and work places could fulfill the 666 system.

There are stories telling that these ostriches are being used to find an alternative cure for bird viruses. Thus, canada is exposing itself as a murderous nation because it wants to continue trudeau's policy of force-vaccinating the people with crippling / murderous mRNA vaccines. The freezing of bank accounts was the threat when the truckers refused to be force-vaccinated, when they took their huge and loud trucks into the canadian capital, asking for a fair resolution that the government refused to give. The protest could have been over as soon as it started if the Liberals had been willing to cease their dictatorial mandates. This tells us how badly the liberals want forced vaccinations. Therefore, I think we should prepare for the worst, the inability to buy our needs, starting imminently.

The ostrich story overlaps with the globalist murder of chickens and cows for fear of their spreading "dangerous" flues to humans. It's a scam. Globalists may want to consciously minimize the food supply in time for a 666 system. Be warned.

Some good news in spite of Trump being in love with mRNA vaccines, his government has defunded almost 3/4-billion dollars from Moderna because it won't cease making an mRNA based bird-flu vaccine.

Interestingly, while I see heraldic OSTriches as part-code for Osts/Hosts (Somerset, beside Rich's) and part-code for Rich's, Osts/Hosts share the bull head (different colors) with Oz's/Os' while Dr. Oz has agreed to take the 400 ostriches into his possession. This puts the canadian government into a bad spotlight, perfect.

Oz's/Os' are in the colors and format of BURleys (Somerset with Osts/Hosts) while Ratcliffs, first known in Bury, share the black bull head with Walerans (Devon with Burys). Oz's/Os' are said to have named Oss in Brabant, beside the first known Lois' of Artois having a giant ostrich. Rich's are said to be from Lorraine, where French Louis' are first known who share the triple lozenges of Parrys, in turn first known in Wales with Welsh Louis' and Lewis'.

In the meantime, the canadian government is now saying -- lying, not sincere -- that the ostriches might be allowed to live. Ya-sure, only now.

Just learned that David Knight has been in for throat surgery, ouch, horrible, and that the doctors cut the nerve in, or to, his tongue as part of that surgery. Old age can be very bad. He probably needs closeness to God because he spends so much time on worldly stories. Illnesses like this usually brings believers close to God. I hope he survives this with his mind intact enough to spend his remaining years close to God. A google search tells me "Surgery on May 12 caused a third stroke and nerve damage. Partial recovery is underway..." His son has taken over the David Knight Show. Nerves take a long time to heal.

I wonder whether David was poisoned. He makes a lot of enemies. I wonder whether Trunews quit doing the news earlier this month of May because the team knows of something dangerous coming down the pike from the deep state. AI has access to everything online, meaning the deep states do too. Somewhere, there are memory banks holding everything anyone has ever written, whether online now or not. Maybe even everything anyone has ever said over the phone on certain platforms (phone companies).

Various deep states will lose everything they've worked together for if they don't successfully censor the opposition soon. I mean soon. Maybe the time has come for some in the podcasting spotlight to use less-vicious tones. Maybe Comey knows of a deep-state plot to take Trump out such that he, Comey, is trying to take the pre-credit for it with his 8647 message. There can be no doubt that many deep-state and state-media leaders have privately shown desire for doing a wide "clean-out" of "guilty" podcasters. The only reason it hasn't yet taken place, in my estimation, is that it's tantamount to self-destruction. How long did Hitler last after openly lashing out murderously?

Even the anti-Christ will last less than 3.5 years before his enemies destroy he and his kingdom. His kingdom comes to an end at the 5th Bowl, which comes in time immediately after the 5th Trumpet, the "locusts" which torment those with the mark of the beast. Contrary to those who wrongly assumed that all seven Seals will be followed by all seven Trumpets, and still later by all seven Bowls, the sequence of Revelation's 21 plagues will be: 1S 1T 1B...5S 5T 5B...7S 7T 7B.

As the 666 will have the effect of starving God's people to death, the locusts look like code for God's attack on the food supply of those with the mark. The "star" that is given the "key to the bottomless pit" from which the locusts originate looks to me like a single, nuclear blast, though others take it for a cosmic rock. A small meteorite does look like a falling star, but it doesn't do much damage. Anything from outer space doing deep-explosive damage on the ground would not look merely like a falling star. Can a nuclear blast poison soils such that foods grown in them instantly cause bodily pain for those who eat them? I don't know. Nobody's exploded a nuclear bomb on the ground for decades.

In the middle of the election, mark carney secretly cut tariffs on American products while pretending, with the voters, that he was going to go tariff-tooth-for-tooth against Trump. carney thus exposed himself as a trickster, a first-degree liar unworthy of the election win:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTDZGjO03io

Here's what cheats do: they force youtube canada to lift CBC videos to the most-prime positions in the algorithm, even if the videos can't make the algorithm cut on their own merits. Tis is cheating by government parasites, and the government is making this known for all to see, which can only backfire and make people watch fewer CBC videos, ha-ha. I never click on a CBC video, NEVER. HA-HA. No other other videos get prime support from the government like that, unless other videos are helpful to what government cheats are plotting. Thank you for making this plain, Liberals, thank you for ruining your own reputations. God's going to expose the "humanists," the man-worshiping anti-Christs, as guilty of all the empty accusations they leveled at the people of Jesus.

Plus, no tariffs from the United States means lower prices for Canadian goods, and less government revenue, a win-win. trudeau's tariffs made canadian products as expensive as if canadian distributors bought at American retail prices, then re-sell them at double the retail prices in the United States. In the meantime, the government got richer while the people got poorer. Trump now wants to do to Americans what trudeau did to canada, with high tariffs on goods coming into the United States from all over the world. Trump is telling Americans to eat it up for a long-term advantage...kind of like the roll of the dice.

carney's government has promised not to get home prices reduced, because it favors those who value their property investments rather than first-time home buyers. That is, they favor rich over poor, the thing they accuse Conservatives of.

Kash Patel and Dan Bongino took a beating the past couple of weeks, from their former supporters and those hold-outs still willing to cling to them. Dan Bongino said that Epstein committed suicide because the FBI files said so. However, prior to his becoming the deputy director of the FBI, he would have said that the FBI whitewashes its files, which is what normal people think. He did not say, a couple of weeks ago, that the FBI files are suspect, but implied, as hard as concrete, that whatever the FBI files say is what the truth is. He comes across as a fraud, or an example of a Conservative becoming a deep-state puppet when a high political position goes to his fleshly head.

Kash told the Fox audience the same, that the FBI files are reliable. This is a sham. An FBI director looking into the corruption of past FBI leaders needs to look elsewhere, beyond FBI files, to find that corruption, but, this week, Kash told the Fox audience that he's not able to look at files in other Intelligence agencies. FRAUD. He's not intending to find the truth. He's not intending to arrest Comey or Mueller or Wray or McCabe or Obama or Biden to make an example of what happens to FBI chiefs and their presidents when they sorely abuse the high power of the FBI.

He's intending to give dog crumbs merely to make a show of "cleaning up the FBI." What good is cleaning the table when the next leftist government will come to puke on it all over again, FEARLESSLY. If Republicans in power are too afraid to show reasons as to why they should be feared, what good is winning elections in the midst of non-stop, long-term Democrat corruption? What good is inflating the hopes of voters with grand promises against the deep state only to deflate them and lose the next election? Are pro-Trump Republicans stupid? Are the voters stupid for trusting Trump?

The only good thing would be if Bongino and Patel both went to jail under the next Democrat government, arrested by the new FBI chiefs that they fail to frighten now, when they have the opportunity. If you don't want to do what needs to be done, step down and go back to podcasting. Let men do it who are willing to take the risks involved.

Bongino and Patel both appeared on Fox this week, as if attempting to rectify what they said a couple of weeks ago. Nothing will rectify things without high-level arrests, without a concerted and genuine attempt to rightly punish Wray and the others. The worst of the bunch is Trump himself, and he may be the reason that Patel is panning out to be lame.

Patel told Bret Baier that he's not withholding anything from the people on Epstein, yet he and/or Pam Bondi greatly redacted information requested by James O'Keefe on that very issue. Nobody at Fox asked Bongino or Patel about the claim of Pam Bondi on the "tens of thousands" of Epstein-related videos now in her possession via the FBI files. This omission by Fox looks like it was requested by Patel as a condition of his and Bongino's appearing on Fox.

Plus, what Intelligence Chiefs were involved with Epstein's programs? Why shouldn't that question be Patel's job to fulfill? It's not only about the under-aged; it's also about Intelligence crimes. Nobody can stomach government rulers acting criminally without fears.

Bongino has promised to show a video of Epstein ALONE in his jail cell. The problem is, Bongino spoke on Fox as though seeing Epstein alone in his cell is absolute proof that he killed himself, even though Bongino admitted that the video doesn't show him actually killing himself. Achem, ah, er, this is clearly a dishonest Bongino, for if he was still doing his podcast show, he'd say, "big deal," showing Epstein alone in his cell is not proof that someone didn't later enter the cell to murder him, or to remove him from prison. Bongino acting the fraud.

In the second half of the video below, the "pipe-bomber" story is at issue. I didn't cover that story, but if I remember correctly, the FBI was complicit in faking a pipe-bombing to further the appearance of a seditious gathering of pro-Trumpers on January 6. Therefore, everyone wants to know whether Bongino and Patel will come clean with that version of the story, versus covering for the FBI.

Good question: if Bongino and Patel are betraying pro-Trumpers while the two are not the president, how much more has Trump been doing so since 2017?

On the other hand, it's possible that the FBI under Patel is sincerely going after the FBIers in the deep state, but that he doesn't want to give hint of it publicly so as not to alert those they are going after. That could have a very good ending. We can more than forgive their being fraudulent now if the sheer purpose is to hide their plots against those guilty of heinous crimes. However, it's just as likely that the deep state has issued death threats against these man and/or their family members...which is why Trump needs to use all Intelligence agencies to catch those making the threats. Trump may not be interested because he'd rather play it safe, just leave the internal gangsters alone, go after low-level Bidenites instead to make a "good show" (i.e. fool's show) of fighting the deep state.

The good news is that Bongino's podcast was so big that many other, similar podcasters can't evade doing their take on the Patel-Bongino cover-up. It's putting pressure on the duo to come clean.

To be sure, Bongino was in the game of podcasting for the prime reason of making money, don't kid yourself, it was not love for his viewers, as he claims. He added other money-making methods (books, corporate deals) to his podcasting, as if making lots of money could destroy the deep state. Now that he's in a prime position to destroy it by simply exposing it, he's looking like a traitor. The country is at the very edge of exposing most of those who have been weighing brutality upon the nation, men who should be murdered by the populace, but Patel and Bongino do not appear poised to give that win to the people. But let's see what more time will produce.

I don't like to use "bombshell" for fear of sounding click-baitish, but the following is a bombshell if you care about things Israel. The real surnames of most Israel prime ministers are Russian / Germanic / Slavic, not typical-Jewish.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yPCHu4anvI

The Rothschild founders of Israel stacked Palestine with Russian Jews. I see the Varangian Rus, co-founders of Moscow, to the Rush surname which shares annulets fessewise with Bulls/Bule's while Petty-like Petts use "BULrushes," indicating a blood relationship between the Rush's and Bulls/Bule's. I'm telling this, not only because the quadrants in the Arms of Rothschild are the Petty quadrants too, but because the annulets of Bulls/Bule's (Somerset with Rothschild-branch Roets) are in the colors of the similar EU logo that itself is probably using the Bauer stars. Mayer Bauer was the first Rothschild banker.

The arrows in the Arms of Rothschild are in the Coat of Barksdale's/BIRKdale's (Lancashire with Birch's) who in turn are in the colors and format of Bulls/Bule's. The Dents, sharing motto terms in the Arms of Rothschild, are probably in the Birch motto. The Birch Crest and Shield look related to Staple's (Kent with Rothes') sharing the PETer motto, and that's the line of Peter Pollock of ROTHES. English Rothes were once said to be first known in Shropshire with the Alans who became the Stewarts who in turn share the checkered fesse of Pett-branch Pitts, first known in Dorset (beside Somerset) with bull-head Beautys.

Peter Pollock's family was first known in Renfrewshire with the Simple's expected in the Birch motto, and the Simple motto, "Keep TRYST," loves the Kiev-line Keeps while Varangian Rus ruled Kiev. Trysts/Trice's are first known in Cornwall with the Speyer-branch Spree's having a "simple" motto term. Keeps share the "weaver's shuttle" with Shuttleworths, first known in Lancashire with Birch's. The latter are first known in Salford with bull-head Ratcliffs while the latter are first known in Bury of Salford while English Burys share the Birch / Staple fleur-de-lys. BURleys/Bourlys (Somerset with bull-head Bulls/Bule's) share the green Shield with Irish Burys, German Bauers/Bowers, Scottish Bowers, and Pollocks (same place as Roet-related Speyers). Mayer Bauer lived in a house he called, "Green Shield," and Greens (Kent with Rothes') are in Birch colors and format.

Watch Tucker Carlson and senator Ron Johnson tell that 9-11 was an inside job without telling that 9-11 was an inside job (maybe because youtube doesn't allow it):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yciAO5lMtVI

There are still people who, with a straight face, will tell us that Muslim hijackers crashed planes into the Trade Towers. This is a wicked world of lunatics breeding lunatics. Stay clear.

Here's evidence that WEF is an organization that elevates child perverts. Note that Tucker is talking what he would never talk while on Fox:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sJ0aulWxOg

WEF is a destroyer of human life, with Nazi-proper mentality. Someone openly said (without fear of prosecution) that trudeau is a pedophile, or something like a pedo pimp in connection to a ring in British Columbia, at Vancouver to be exact. Add to that carney's relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell. Such disgusting demons, Obama included, are elevating one another to positions of power just in time for the unforgiving, merciless fires of Armageddon.

In the video below, trudeau is criticized this week for wearing a suit but with SNEAKERs to see king Charles speak in canada, and then there's a murder mystery in British Columbia involving sneakers? For example, the headline: "More than a dozen feet in shoes have washed up on B.C. beaches"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqGnLN6dE4Y

Another headline: "Canada's mysterious case of washed-up human feet". The article says, "For the sixth time in less than a year, a human foot encased in a running shoe has washed ashore in Canada's Pacific coast province, a witness and police said Wednesday [2008]." While state media give excuses for ruling out murder, why don't we hear of feet-in-sneakers washing up profusely at other ocean shores??? Hum? Why do the stupids take us for stupid? The brother of King Charles, prince Andrew, was accused of Epstein crimes with and by Virginia Giuffre. People think she was murdered recently. Who do you think might be the chief suspect for her suspicious ending?

I was on Vancouver Island (part of British Columbia) all winter until about April, 2008, very near to where trudeau goes on vacation. I was staying off the Pacific beach (short walk to it), and a boy went missing at that time from the beach. The article above is written in June of 2008, meaning that the sneakers look like murders during the winter that I was there. I'm just wondering if God arranged that visit to that area in order to send us a message concerning the hideous preoccupation with pedophilia of some Liberal parliamentarians.

Pedophiles are becoming known for speaking in code openly on TV and other public platforms. Trudeau's sneakers at the king's event may have been his celebratory codework for his knowledge of the BC sneaker mystery, in which case the king appears involved. I wouldn't dare suggest that unless someone in the news openly and fearlessly accused trudeau of pedophilia operations out of Vancouver. google canada won't cough up his name or his story at this time, not a wonder. Some people think that faggot Obama was born in the Vancouver area when his mother attended a university in Seattle.

Someone writes: "It is an unusual coincidence that Justin Trudeau chose an FBI recognized pedophile symbol to represent The Trudeau Foundation." There are not a few people who think trudeau is somehow engrossed in pedophilia. google canada should allow all of those stories to be heard, and trudeau can then defend himself against the accusations if he possesses the innocence to do so. He has the money to take any of the accusers to court to clear his name. It's roundly known that trudeau supports the most disgusting type of faggotry, transvestites in schools, for example. He maimed / murdered children and adults alike with vaccines, I cannot hold back. I watched him closely in the plandemic. He is a disgusting demonoid coming as an angel of light.

Here's Candice Owens claiming openly, without fear of prosecution, that president Macron's "wife" was/is a male pedophile:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0ECm-QYTZI

Here's more evidence that canada is on-course for destruction of the country in order to make the common people poor and helpless:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-_NCFcnUmI

If interested in a run-down of the financial nature of carney's chief of staff, here's motor-mouth, Moose on the Loose (he needs to talk slower, explain his positions more):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5z5289HG6k

I'd like to say that Conservative podcasters in Canada do not like to mention each other, almost as though they don't want to give a little plug to their should-be-partners for fear that the competition will take viewers / subscribers from them. For example, Rebel News did super journalism in exposing carney's tax haven on the Isle of Man, but I saw no other podcaster repeating that news. This situation is a disaster for winning elections, when podcasters prioritize the moneyline of their video channels.

---

NEXT UPDATE Next Monday

Here's all four Gospels wrapped into one story.

For Some Prophetic Proof for Jesus as the Predicted Son of God.
Also, you might like this related video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3EjmxJYHvM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efl7EpwmYUs

Pre-Tribulation Preparation for a Post-Tribulation Rapture

---