I missed something in the past few updates, which I'll add here. Here's from the first update of this month:

...Then, in the same update, it occurred to me that Steve TARR, who got the assist to my goal, could possibly be a pointer to the oil in Alberta's TAR sands, which is the crux of Alberta's separation movement.

...The goal took place like so, with under a minute to go in a 2-2- tie game, in the semi-final match. Steve Tarr took a pass at the right-side boards, at the center-ice line, then skated with the puck over the blue line and took a slap shot. I was skating a little behind him down center ice toward the net. There was just one defenseman between us and the goalie. His slap shot knocked the goalie flat on his back; the puck bounced over his head and, hitting the ice behind him, slid/rolled to the goal line but not over. I'm wondering whether Tarr represents the Alberta Conservatives, therefore, who, along with the country's other Conservatives, almost won the election that was a near tie by popular vote.

The point now is, CENTER ICE. The Centers/SANTers and Centers/SANDers, you see. First off, Centers/Santers share the leopard faces of Peare's and PILE's, and while Peare's are first known in Oxfordshire with OILeys, Pile's are first known in Somerset with Tarrs and Bulls/Bule's. The team PILED on me after tipping in Tarr's slap shot.

You can load Centers/Santers now, which loads on another tab, in order to load other surnames, to better follow the heraldic links.

I can trace Bulls/Bule's to the "BULrushes" of Petts who in turn share the Bully mascles. But before giving the punch line, let's add that the Center/Sander bull heads are in colors reversed from the Sanden bull heads. The main point now is that the Pett and Bully mascle is used by Alberta's!!!

Petts are first known in Kent with English Alberts. The Pett bulRUSHes apply to Bulls/Bule's where Rush's share fessewise annulets with them, yet the Rush annulets are colors reversed from the one of Italian Alberts! There's no doubt that Tarr and I were rushing up the ice when scoring that goal. Bulls/Bule's share the annulet on blue with Italian Alberts.

There's a few more points, one where Centers/Santers are in Sand and Sandy format, and in colors reversed. Sandens are in Dog/Dock colors and format while a "dog" is in the Sanderson Crest. Dogs/Docks are first known in Perthshire with the Alberta-like Halberts who in turn use axes in Dog/Dock colors and format, and one Axe river is in Somerset with the first-known Bulls/Bule's and Ducks/Dacks who in turn have lion heads in the colors of the lions of Duce's, the latter first known in Staffordshire with English Docks/Dox's. The "veillant" motto term of Sandersons can be cone for the Valence's/Valants (Kent with Alberts) who happen to have the five fesses of German Ducks/Dockers in colors reversed.

There's nothing of a compelling pointer to Alberta tar sands where Duck liners and Sand liners were related, yet German Alberts happen to share a white, eight-pointed star with Ducs/LeDucs. The latter almost have the Coat of Handels who in turn are first known in Silesia with the Sitlers in turn sharing the trefoil of Moe's/Moins and Ice's. Scott Moe, premier of Saskatchewan, wants the Albert oil to be turned on.

My position, that year of the goal, was center ice, and while my mother has a Grimaldi maiden name, Moe's/Moins can be gleaned as a branch of Monks (Devon with Pike's), from Monaco, home of Grimaldi's. Pike's share the Moe/Moin trefoil too, and then Moons are first known in Dorset with the Pitts sharing a stork in Crest with Petts. The Pett stork is in the bulrushes.

Pitts share the checkered fesse of Scottish RIGHTs (Berwickshire with MACKs) while English Rights are first known in Sussex with English Pucks. German Pucks share the Albert annulet, and English Pucks use hands for possible connection to Handels. Macks have 10 of the 12 pale bars of Tarrs. Steve Tarr's position was RIGHT winger, and while English Rights share leopard faces (different colors) with PARsons, English Rights share the double fesses of Parrs while Parsons share the leopard faces of Centers/Santers. Peare's share the Parson leopard faces while Rooks, beloved on German Terras', were once said to be first known in Oxfordshire with Peare's.

Parr's and Rights have two of the Parry fesse, and while Parrys have the Hind Coat in colors reversed, Perrys share the "hind" in Crest (different color) with English Wingers. Steve Tarr played RIGHT WINGER, and Wings/Winks are first known in Worcestershire with Rooks and Rocks. Wingers have a Coat version of English Mountains, the latter first known in Essex with Hinds. Hindels are in Handel colors. Perrys share the Massey quadrants while the winged Massey horse, which jibes with the Masci wings, is likely in the Coat of Dutch Mackays/Macks (share Massey quadrants).

My mother's mother was born Miss Masci, and Masci's have a version of the Mack bend which itself shares the stars of Maceys/Mace's (Cheshire with Hands). The Mack bend-with-items is similar to the one of Scottish Terras', first known in Moray with Bellys who in turn share the Duc/LeDuc star. Bullys are first known in Dumfries with Bells, and Bellamys first in Shropshire with Sandfords. Morays almost have the Duc/LeDuc Coat, and do have the Handel Coat.

Dumfries is also where Scottish McGee's are first known, and Steve Tarr scored four times in the next game, the championship game, on the goalie, Jim McGee. We won the game (6-2), and, hopefully, it's God's pointer to a victory that Alberta will soon have over the Liberal scums. McGee's share the chevronwise swords of Reckitts, the latter suspect in the motto of Perrys.

Dumfries is also where Legge's are first known that almost have the giant Trump stag head. A theory I presented, after carney won the election unexpectedly, as if at the last minute by election fraud, is that I represented carney and the Rothschild bankers when tipping in Tarr's slap shot, whereas Tarr represented the other side, the Albertans. I was sliding in on my shin pads i.e. on my LEGS when tipping Tarr's slap shot into the net. It was a TIP-IN, and Tipps'/Tippins use a bull head. It was a poke-in, and Poke's/Pollocks were proto-Rothschilds. I speared the puck in with my stick, and Spears/SPEYERS (same place as Poke's/Pollocks) share the boar head of Rothschild-branch Roets (Somerset with Bulls/Bule's). Rothschilds/Roddensteins are first known in SPEYER.

While Calles' (Wiltshire, beside Bulls/Bule's) use trumpets, German Trumps/Tromps are in the colors and format of the giant rose of Culles'/Cola's. Cole's/Colds have a giant bull in the colors of the eagle of Dutch Tromps and Legge-like Lecce's/Lexi's. Bole's/Bolls, first known in Lincolnshire with leg-using Leaks, share the boar head of Hindels who in turn almost have the Trump/Tromp Coat. Lecca is where Culles'/Cola's are first known. Lecce's are first known in Brescia, beside Val Trompia. Lex's, sharing the Spink mascle, are first known in Switzerland with the Sens' (Lex colors and format) sharing the Spink eagle, and Spinks are first known in Northamptonshire with the Quince's sharing the mascle of Alberta's and Bullys.

The Culles-beloved Rose's are first known in Silesia with the "SPHINX"-using Brocuffs, and with the Sitlers/Schitners while Calles' can be gleaned as Shute/Shitt kin. Silesia is also where Hindel-like Handels are first known. Hindels have a "stag lodged" while Lodge's/Loge's share the lion of Lecce's/Lexi's. Rose-loving Lakeys/Lecks probably have giant-leg Prime's (Lincolnshire with leg-using Leaks/Leakeys) in their motto.

Maybe I'm Crazy with Heraldic Pointers

Heraldic pointers can be coincidental. It sounds crazy for me to believe that God set up the heraldry of various surnames to connect with each other in order to point to situations in the modern world. I've been thinking in recent months that God set up such heraldry to point to justin trudeau and mark carney. Therefore, I'll give a short example of what looks like an heraldic pointer where trudeau's government set up the so-called "carbon tax."

The French Carbon surname almost has the Chief of English Ducks/Dacks while Tax's/Dacks share the crossed swords of BORDERs. The latter are not only first known in Somerset with Ducks/Dacks, but they share the same star with French Carbons. English Carbons have a border and half the crossed swords of Tax's/Dacks and Ducks/Dacks. That's it, a solid connection between Carbons and Tax's...looks like a pointer to the carbon tax now abusing Canadians from the hand of globalist, climate-change theft.

We can either view it as a coincidence, or we can ponder why God would make pointers to certain topics with such a "crazy" (hard-to-believe) method. As Scottish Roets are first known in Somerset too while German Roets use a MOE- and Monk-connectable "moon," it's notable that the Irish Swords, in-code with the Tax/Dack, Duck/Dack and Carbon surnames, use "wings EXPANDED", similar to the Crest of Scottish Roets. Here's from the last update amid pointers to premier Scott MOE of Saskatchewan, one of the provinces pondering separation from eastern canada:

The "book exPANDed" of Roets can be code for Panders, noting that Payens/Pagans are also Pans. Their English Page branch, in Monk/Moyne colors and format, are first known in Devon with Monks/Moyne's and Dove-connectable Wests...for a pointer to western Canada. Page-beloved Dove's are first known in Berwickshire with Books, and Pansys/PANTzers use doves in the colors of the Peace/Paise doves for a pointer to "slice to pieces."

"Sliced to pieces" is a phrase stressed over the past few updates that I see as a pointer to the willingness for western Canadians to separation from Carny's government. The Trudeau surname is first known in Ile-de-France with LePAGE's who in turn share the Coat of French Page's, first known in Dauphine with Payens/Pagans and Alan-related French Galli's; the latter happen to share triple-gold stars in Chief with the Duck/Dack Chief, itself almost the Chief of French Carbons.

If that's not enough, Payne's, from Payne Roet, are first known in Somerset with Roets, Ducks/Dacks and Borders. Panders/Panters even share so-called "spur rowells" with Payens/Pagans while Spurrs are first known in Devon (beside Somerset) with Monks/Moyne's (Slice colors and format), and with Page's who share the white dove with Pansys/Pantzers. Monks/Moyne's, solidly expected as a Moe/Moen/Moin branch, have lion heads in the colors of the Payne and Bath lions, and while Baths are first known at Bath of Somerset, they share the cross of English Carbons. Spurr-branch Supers (Devon with Spurrs) share the saltire of Bats, the latter first known in Shropshire with Velen-related Alans (once showed the Velen/Valance ducks).

But there's more, because Pansys/Pantzers are first known in Westphalia with German Ducks/Dockers who have the five fesses of Scottish Valence's/VALANTs (wings in Crest) while Westphalia is where Duck-using Velins are first know along with the Velens/Valence's/Falens who once showed ducks. Valentins use squirrels while Squirrels share the red squirrel with German Daggers while English Daggers are first known in Cumberland with English Dockers, and with the Falcons in the Duck/Dack Crest.

Both Velens/Valence's/Falens and French Alans showed the same ducks, yet both now show the same MARTLets while French MARTELs are first known in GASCONY with French carbons. Both share the white crescent with Moons. English Martels, first known in Essex with Slice's/SLEDGE's" (!), happen to use "hammers" while Alberta-like Alberts have a "sledge hammer"!!! Carney: sliced to pieces. It just so happens that German Gascons are listed with Gas'! trudeau and carny have denied the building of piplines out of Alberta and Saskatchewan.

Having said that, we go to the Wing/WINK surname, once said to first first known in Perthshire with sword-using Justin(e)s, but now said to be first known in Worcestershire with Valentin-beloved Squirrel. VINKovci was where emperor Valentinian I was born who married JUSTINE of Picenum, and thus we are pointing here, quite obviously, in conjunction to a pointer to the carbon tax, to JUSTIN trudeau.

You can either view these heraldic connections as coincidences, or you can ponder, as I do, that God might do something so strange as to capture a poor bloke like me to deliver the heraldic links...poor because I never know for sure whether I'm putting words in God's mouth with such a claim. It unsettles me at times.

Just to belabor the links, let's repeat that Moe's/Moens/Moins share the trefoil of Sitlers/SCHITners while Shute's/Shitts, first known in Wiltshire (beside Somerset) with the Duck/Dack- and Carbon-beloved Stars, share the swords (different positioning) of Tax's/Dacks. Scott Moe opposes the carbon tax, the biggest reason for separation desired by Canadians in his province. Wiltshire is beside Dorset, where Moons are first known.

Moe's/Moens/Moins share the trefoil of English Pike's (Devon again) while Scottish Pike's/PICKENs share the Duck/Dack and Carbon stars. Justine of PICENum, you see. The Arms of PIACENza has a square while Square's are listed with Squirrels. Valence's/Valants are first known in Kent with Picks/Pix's. The Payne lozenges are shared with Pickers/Peckers/Packers (Bath colors and format) who in turn share the cross-by-lozenges with Stolls/Stowells (Somerset with Payne's and Baths) who in turn how a white dove in Crest...though Hall of Names says there is (in that Chief) an "eagle HOLDING a scroll in its BEAK"." Holdings (beakless eagles called "ALLERions") were kin of Allers, first known in Westphalia with Pansys/Pantzers, Velins, Velens/Valence's, Wells/Wellers, and Ducks/Dockers. Wells/Wellers almost have the Welsh CARNE Coat for what looks like a pointer to mark carney's carbon-tax and climate-change programs. Carneys use swords in the colors of the Justin sword.

The swords of Skins/Scan and Mucks are in the colors of the Sword and Tax/Dack swords while Skin-branch SCHIMs/Schiens (both beside Mucks) share the boar of MOWs/Mole's and the Chief of Wreaths in the "wreath" of Pickers/Peckers/Packers. A SCIMitar is in the Crest of Scottish Mochs who in turn share the Coat of Wreath's. The latter, with the Mochs, share the Carney lion. French Mochs, first known in Burgundy with the Pilate's sharing the Carney pheons, share the Justin and Carney sword. Coincides? Or did God capture me to produce these heraldic links?

Are Skins/Scans a pointer to skin-scanning machines for the 666 purchasing system? I expect the latter from big bankers, and carney has been a big bankerman. His anti-Christ Liberal party sides with Palestinians i.e. looks anti-Israel. Skins/Scans and Schim/Schiens are first known in Aberdeenshire with Scottish Mans in the "man's head" of the Swords who share triple swords, in the same colors, as Skins/Scans.

Swords describe their swords as "eRECT", excellent for proving that erect features in other surnames are for the Reckitts/Ricketts with the same swords but adding a SCIMitar in Crest. Reck-like Wrecks show nothing but a border for connection to Carbons, and Borders are first known in Somerset with Cole of the Cole's/COALs. Note the scimiTAR, for Borders are first known in Somerset with Tarrs. The carbon tax goes with tar sands of Alberta, two opposing issues fueling separation.

In heraldry, tar drops are black drops, and while those drops fill the Shield of Drops/Trupe's, Scottish Troops/Trupe's are first known in Banffshire with Mucks. The latter have a sword in the colors and format of the giant "goose" of GAS'/GASCONs! And, if you can believe it, Goose's/Gouch's (Roxburghshire with Mows/Mole's) share the Mow/Mole and Schim/Schien boar. French Carbons (and French Gascons) are first known in GASCONy!

Even if Mows were not a Moe branch, Mows can yet be a pointer to Scott Moe. Scottish Scotts share the Coat Scottish Terras', the latter first known in Moray while Mows/Mole's almost have the Moray and Handel Coat, but see also Ducs/LeDucs. Handels / Handle's are first known in Silesia with Sitlers in turn sharing the Moe/Moen/Moin trefoils. Mows/Mowls/Mole's do suddenly look like a Moe / Monk / Moon branch.

Gascony is also where the LABELs/La Bells are first known who share the crescent of Moons and French Martels (Gascony). I showed above how the hammers of English Martels point to Alberta's separation movement. A "label" is used by Scottish Pagans under which they almost have the OILey Coat.

Scottish Pagans come up as Pings, first known in Yorkshire with Pincs who in turn have the lozenges of Payne's and Stolls/STOWells in colors reversed. Stows/Stouts share the patee-fitchees of Pincs, which the latter use in their BORDER. Payne's and Stolls/STOWells are both first known in Somerset with Tax- and Duck-connectable Borders, and with Ducks/Dacks. German Ducks/Dockers and Valentin branches are first known in Westphalia with Holding-related Allers while Holdings are first known in Lancashire with Holds/Holts sharing the patee-fitchees of Pincs and Stolls/Stowers. Holds/Holts share the squirrel (different colors) with Valentins.

Repeat: "Skins/Scans and Schim/Schiens are first known in Aberdeenshire with Scottish Mans in the "man's head" of the Swords who share triple swords, in the same colors, as Skins/Scans." It's also where Cups/Cope's/Colps are first known whom I trace to the Kupa/COLAPis river, suspect from the COLchians there, but suspect also with "Apis" (in "ColAPIS"), a mythical bull, for Cole's/COALs have a giant bull. They are said to have named Cole in Somerset, but touching also upon the Malmesbury into Wiltshire, at least near the Shute's/Shitts who share the same three swords.

MALMESbury may have been named by the Mames variation of Man-like Mens', kin of Poppins/Pophams, the latter first known in Hampshire with Cup-branch Copps, which goes well with the man's head of Swords said to be "COUPed at the neck." Scottish Mathie's/MANNs/Maghans share the motto of Hilts in the "silver hilts" of the Sword swords. Coppers are first known in Sussex (between Copps of Hampshire and Reckitts of Kent) with Boards while Borders are also Boarders. Boards look related to the Coat of SEWERs/SHUTERs/Suits. German Suters, first known in Bavaria with blue-wing Bauers, share the fleur-de-lys of German Matts/MattMANNs. Mathie's/Matthews have blue wings.

The Colapis river is near Rijeka/Rika while we saw Reckitts/Ricketts off of the "erect" Sword swords. To the near-north of Rijeka is Bled while Bleds, with a "tous" motto term, share the triple chevrons of English Mathie's/Matthews in both colors. In one color only, Carbons share triple-gold chevrons of Mathie's/Matthews. Bled is where the CARNI of Carniola lived. Is this not looking like a pointer to the violent carbon tax insisted by trudeau and carney?

Tous' can be suspect in the "ParaTUS" motto of Swords because Tous'/Tosini's share the "man" with Swords. The man's head of Swords is said to be "in profile", as is "Moses' head" of HILTons, and the latter share the double fesses of Parrs to indicate that "PARatus" is part-code for them. Hiltons are first known in Durham with MATISons/Madisons. I would guess that Partons have the Chief-Shield colors of Mens-loving Poppins (same place as Perrys) and Keith Catti, as well as the Coat of Antinghams because the latter are first known in Norfolk with Keats, Cattans, and Parsons.

Parrs and Parrys are in the last update connected to Hinds and "hind"-using Perrys (Hampshire), and so the back end of the thing in the Crest of Sword-like Sewards can be the hind of a stag or deer. Scute's/Scutts (Lancashire with Parrs) use the "deer."

Sword-beloved Hilts and Mathie's/Manns have a "Fac et" motto phrase expected with Faucets (East Lothian with Keiths/MASCALs) who share the giant Matt/Matthew lion. While Saer de Quincy is in the Faucet write-up as the builder of the Faucet castle, Quincy's happen to share the Alberta mascle. Mascals look like kin of Saddocks/Sedgewicks who in turn almost have the Coat of Moses-beloved Calvarys.

Mathie's/Matthews are excellent where Welsh Matts/Matthews, essentially sharing the giant lion of English Wells (two TAILs on lion), are first known in Glamorganshire with Carne's and Tail-branch Tillers. German Wells almost have the Coat of the Carne's above, but we're not done because Mathis', kin of Chives', are first known in Burgundy with Pilate's/Pilotte's/Pilots in turn sharing the pheons of Sword-loving Carneys. English Wells are first known in Lincolnshire with Cup-loving Pilotte's, and French Pile's/Pilots share the giant lion of Sword-beloved Hilts. While Chives' are also SHEWas', Shaws have the Pilotte Coat (cups). Mattis' (not "Mathis") are first known in Abruzzo with Sheaves'/Chiava's.

The TILURius river (not far from the Colapis) is also the CETINa while cat-using Cetins/Cattans share the fitchee of Tarves' while cat-using Chives' are first known in Tarves...in Aberdeenshire with Sword-loving Skins/Scans. The "lupus" motto term of Cetins/Cattans can be for the English Lupus'/Wolfs/Welfs sharing the triple wolf heads of Skins/Scans.

Cavii Illyrians were at the Mathis river, now the Mat, and at neighboring Lissus, the line to French Lise's/Lys', first known in Ile-de-France with Trudeau's. English Lise's/Liss' (Hampshire with Copps) almost have the TRUDE Coat. It's carbon-tax interesting that OILeys are also "DuLYS."

Chives' and Mathis' share the same moline cross while Goat-loving Moline's can be connected to the goats of Scottish Manns. Thus, Mathie's/Manns/Maghans look like a Man branch connectable to a family from the Mathis/Mat river.

Why Really Are Sunspots Dark?

In the 6th minute of the video below, a graph of solar minimums and maximums is shown heating the earth, by-and-large progressively warmer, from the 1800s to the year 2,000, during the so-called "industrial revolution" that fake science had pinned on man-made "global warming" i.e. the "greenhouse effect." That bogus claim was so disrupted by true scientists that the fakes had to change "global warming" to "climate change," which conveniently allows for both cooler or warmer periods in any given region of the planet, though the fakes imply that these regions are unusually cooler or warmer due to gas emissions. Baloney. Plus, the chaos bogeyman can be conjured up by "climate change." For example, it's now responsible for the forest-fire, flood, or hurricane bogeyman.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PnVbT-tpot8

Note that there could be more deliberate, fake science where sunspot activity is being blamed for black-outs in Quebec. That's where the anti-Christ Liberals live who are apt to advertise as reliable whatever the globalists announce as fact. What one could expect of globalists seeking "population control" by mass-murder is their own wiping out of electrical grids for months at a time, blaming it on sunspot activity as well as a failure to obtain grid parts for repairs. I have read that the people responsible for electrical grids did/do not stockpile vital parts for repairs, very suspicious, is it not?

Plus, there could be an additional plot to blame China's military for a massive grid failures, and China may even accept media blame if it can discredit the blame yet see canada's population massacred with Liberal support. We are dealing with demonic, globalist lunatics, made very obvious in numerous ways. The only thing keeping globalists from using massive grid failures to kill off populations is the sudden loss of workers for their manufacturing plants, and the sudden loss of revenue for corporations. The workforce problem can be alleviated soon by vigorous robot manufacturing, yet the fact that smaller populations buy less products means that corporate bosses should oppose mass-murder-by-design.

The good news is, they probably won't try SUDDEN-mass-murder-by-design, but many think they are already giving the green light to SLOW-murder-by-design.

Preparation by media announcements for another possible fake-job is where they blame solar activity for knocking out satellites, in case they decide to knock out Internet communications at a critical time in which they need it. Which is worse, a grid or Internet failure? The preparation is where they "educate" us on the scare that solar flares can knock out satellites, but it can't be that hard to build satellite equipment to withstand merely some extra solar-flare energy. If they tell us that 40 satellites were damaged by solar flares, that number is a drop in the bucket. An announcement that the Internet was knocked out by a solar flare should be taken as a faked announcement. Solar-activity peak (for the last 11-year cycle) is roughly right now, in mid-2025, and the solar-wind wave, which is all over social media, should be arriving May 18 later this week. I expect no damage amid the hype.

A google offering: "Spain still investigating cause of blackout, but solar flare not blamed. Spain has not reached any conclusions about what caused a major power outage on April 28, contrary to online claims saying authorities are blaming them on solar flare activity, a theory space weather experts rejected as highly unlikely." This shows that, if EU globalists conduct a blackout for to blame it on sunspots, there are sunspot / technical experts who can counter the claim, frustrating the globalists...meaning that they could try to get certain experts on-board the plot to deviously affirm potential, solar-flare danger to satellites.

Doesn't the following appear like human plotting: "Eduardo Prieto, the director of operations for the grid, Red Electrica, said the systems had been stable, until two "disconnection" incidents within seconds of each other in the south-west, where Spain has substantial solar generation." As nobody can explain how the disconnections took place, two of them occurring together at two separate locations (in the south-west) looks man-made. The black-out did not occur at peak-power usage so that it doesn't seem likely that the grid was over-loaded. It did occur in late April, 2024, approaching solar-flare maximum, though the nearest solar flare, to that date, was in March.

The only one since was on May 13/14, this week. NASA has a youtube video on this one, but one cannot tell which visuals are computer-faked verses true, and as NASA doesn't indicate to the viewer which are being shown at any given time, the dialogue cannot be trusted. This flare was at the far edge of the sun, spewing NOT toward earth. The initial light burst didn't do any damage, but NASA's video scares the viewer, you see. And NASA is a globalist, psy-op provider. The video announced some "disruptions" in some radio/radar communications, but I'll assume that this is hype fodder because the video then says that there is future danger to satellites and GPS data (oh no, driverless cars will crash into your car). If two radio or airport systems are disrupted, the goons make you think it's widespread.

The NASA video (nothing worth watching) has a comment: "They made it look like everywhere blacked out but I live in Scotland and our power stayed on, only London had a power outage." Ya-but, maybe London was in on the psy-op, because it's a hub of climate-change / goonery activism.

The good news: "Minutes before the outage [not this week], Spain was running on 60.64% solar photovoltaic generation, with 12% wind and 11.6% nuclear." Therefore, whether over-reliance on green energy was the cause or not, it can yet be the accusation such that it thwarts thieves like mark carney in their rabid ambitions to advance green energy to the point of ZERO gas / CO2 emissions.

"...four nuclear power reactors at Almaraz, Asco and Vandellos were automatically shut down by the outage,..." I suppose it's automatic so that the reactors are not over-worked trying to make up for other systems shut down, but this only goes to show how bad an idea it is to depend on solar-panel electricity if it's not safe from shut-down, where nuclear reactors are the back-up systems instead of gas / coal plants.

The addition of gas-generated CO2 to the already-miniscule addition of CO2 from natural sources is so miniscule that any scientist with half a brain will tell you that there is no climate crisis based on the greenhouse effect. There is no climate-change crisis. The fact that sea levels are not rising or falling unordinarilly proves that there has been ZERO global warming.

What kind of an idiot makes the claim that a sunspot is black in color because it's a "colder" region than the rest of the sun? What kind of a jackass says that a sunspot, which is the center of an explosion from the solar "surface," is colder than the solar surface? The idiots have a problem: they wish to remain idiots forever, not confessing that light is a literal wave through the light-wave medium that is the solar wind. They are embarrassing, a blotch on education.

The sun spews freed electrons. These are the solar wind. They eject in all directions outward from the sun, and thus they constitute a cosmic sea, a medium through which light waves propagate. Light is therefore not made of photons proper. Instead, each ejected electron forms one light wave. On the one hand, an ejected electron is akin to a photon, because both are projectiles, yet the light wave is not a projectile, and the ejected electron is a projectile for a microscopic distance only. Afterward, it becomes part of the flowing solar wind.

Plus, the impossible speed of the photon is not nearly achieved by the speed of ejected electrons. The light wave can achieve the so-called "speed of light," but not the solar-ejected electrons. It takes a few days for the electrons ejected from the sun to arrive to earth as part of the solar-wind flow. They do not continue to emit light waves as they flow. Only when they eject from an atom do they create one wave each. LOGICAL. I see no other alternative for explaining light.

The black in sunspots can only be due to the absence of light waves coming toward earth. The upward-exploded sunspot material, which is always emitting electrons, falls back to the sun. If it falls faster away from earth than the ejection of its electrons toward earth, the ejected electrons cannot strike the outgoing neighboring solar-wind electrons, and thus no lights waves are formed toward earth. Sunspots are thus excellent evidence that light is a wave through solar-wind electrons.

Sunspots are formed when solar flares fall back to the sun. Solar flares viewed from their sides never form black material, but rather are bright because the black color can only be formed when solar-flare material moves directly opposite the direction toward earth. But if the idiots were correct with their idiotic claim that the black color is due to cooler material, then solar flares seen from their sides should have black color too. Due to flares going up and down at angles, some sunspots form from various regions to the sides of its dead-center region (which faces earth dead-on).

Sunspots that last weeks cannot be single flares, but many flares continuous forming at the same but rotating location. Beware: many "photos" of sunspots can be mere computer animations, because NASA is a deception machine that wants to advertise itself as cutting-edge marvelous with hyped but faked photography in every department of cosmology and astronomy.

Sunspots are called "coronal ejections," and are thus akin to volcanic explosions. However, these explosions are not necessarily formed from hottest locations within the sun. Instead, they may be formed where the swirling of deeper material randomly happens to pass upward MOST EASILY in a lower-pressure path such that it picks up more speed. Rather than being akin to a volcano made by a hot spot, the latter view is more akin to a tornado funnel through low-pressure air such that air rises upward at unusual speeds.

The Real Comet-Tail Mechanism

These same stupids are too idiotic to confess that comets are not made of ice even though they can now photograph comets. Not one has been seen to be made of ice. Duh. What kind of an idiot continues to spew the same embarrassing "education" even when his own eyes tell him it's erroneous? Do they even ask the world for help in coming up with a better explanation for the comet tail? NO? Why not? Because they are PROUD idiots. Proud of what? Of their superior knowledge...that turns out to be wrong. They wouldn't be deemed idiots, just for that, unless their wrong explanations are so-obviously wrong. Ice balls in outer space? Are you kidding me? Did they come from an all-water planet that formed from steam orbiting around a star? IDIOTS. The water planet then shot pieces of itself around our sun. IDIOTS. Or is their a cosmic water fountain somewhere where every sprayed-out drop is one comet? IDIOTS. They see that asteroids are rocks, and should therefore expect comets to be rocks, but their own big-bang science caused them to become blind to the real explanation for the comet tail.

For their failures to understand that solar and planetary gravity repels free electrons, they decided that comet tails are formed from melting ice in the freezing conditions of outer space. What kind of an idiot makes such a laughable claim? In reality, the light of comet tails is formed from free electrons ejected from rock atoms, and then driven away from the sun by solar gravity.

The earth would have no liquid water if it did not have an atmosphere, because the air causes solar heat to go back into space slower than it would otherwise. As it can be assumed guaranteed that comets spin on an axis, as does the earth, it's half-the-time in sunlight and out of sunlight, wherefore there's no chance for an ice ball to melt when it's as far out as the orbit of Jupiter. Yet comet tails form that far out. It should be obvious to the goofs that they need another explanation.

They say: "As a comet approaches the Sun, the heat causes ice to vaporize, forming a cloud of gas and dust called the coma around the nucleus." Are you kidding me? The coma becomes as bright as burning fire due merely to melted water??? Are they science lunatics? YES, and they want to make it sound as though they have the whole thing all figured out due to their superior intelligence. That's why I call them idiots, as a re-occurring message to you that they ought not to be respected.

The coma looks like burning fire because it's made of the same substance, freed electrons, as flames from combustion. The comet is not literally combusting, but both flames and the comet rock emit free electrons, which is the cause of light. Light is not from photons, which do not exist, but is from freed electrons. Only a wacko thinks that wee-wee particles much smaller than electrons can be catapulted to travel at 186,000 miles per second without suffering destruction. ONLY AN IDIOT. Only a wacko thinks that wee-wee particles much smaller than electrons can repeatedly bounce off of materials at 186,000 miles per second without suffering destruction.

Only an idiot thinks that photons can bounce in all directions when striking glass atoms, and then provide a clear picture to your eyes on the other side of the glass. If they don't pass straight through the glass, they cannot provide a clear picture to the eyes. No projectile can pass through glass (or six feet of water) without striking countless atoms, but in order to make this lunatic thing sound more reasonable, they go and make the additional mistake of claiming that glass (and water) is more than 99-percent space. LAUGHABLE IDIOTS. But don't laugh if you believed them.

Like all materials, comet-rock atoms have electrons captured by protonic attraction. When any atom draws progressively nearer to the sun, the negative charge of the suns's sea of free electrons progressively repels more captured electrons from the atom. A comet's freed electrons therefore worm through the atomic spaces and pores of the rock body until ejecting from the comet's outer surface. The tail's brightness is evidence that bits of rock material, and probably individual atoms too, are eroded off, into space, by these ejections.

As the rock bits get out into free space with the free electrons, the bits get pushed away from the sun by the flow of free electrons away from the sun. Therefore, the rock bits are pushed into the comet's tail. In the meantime, free electrons issuing from within the rock bits form the light of the comet tail. It's not the free electrons in the tail that begin the light waves, but the ejection of electrons from the rock bits. The light waves pass through the free electrons, but the latter do not initiate or "ignite" the waves. Free electrons in any space CARRY the light waves initiated by electron emission. The bits of rock in the tail are immersed in the sea of free electrons, the solar wind, that fills the solar system.

Gravity proper needs to be defined anew as the negative charge of free electrons existing in all molten masses. When any object, including comets, falls toward a gravity source, it becomes heavier because the gravity source blows away some of its captured electrons, and thus the atoms are forced to take on a higher net-positive charge. Gravity thus attracts atoms more strongly (as they fall toward gravity), which is the definition of "heavier." Weight is the pull of gravity.

Here's something that modern science won't grasp until it admits that gravity is a negative charge from a body of freed electrons: a rock that loses mass by losing electrons becomes heavier.

The idiots merely gambled when claiming that electrons are attracted by gravity, because they are play-loose idiots. There was no way for them to put an electron on a weight scale. They couldn't prove that a batch of free electrons were drawn downward, yet they claimed that electrons are pulled by gravity nonetheless because the gravity force they invented supposedly pulls all matter. Ya-but stupids, first look at the evidence before making that claim. Which way do electrons go, up or down, when freed into space?

They neglected the evidence like loose-playing science sluts because big-bang science needed electrons to be attracted by gravity, otherwise proto-stars could not attract free electrons (supposedly formed in the big-bang explosion). If proto-stars could not attract free electrons, the H atoms that define stars could not form all the other elements that are the ingredients of the planets supposedly formed from gaseous star material. Therefore, they ignored the evidence that informs them that electrons are repelled by gravity, and they kept this evidence from you.

We cannot excuse them, so long as they do not repent, because they should have known, from the comet, that gravity repels something. They saw with their own eyes that gravity could be forming a wind of material blowing away from the sun, but, even after the discovery of the electrons that constitute the solar wind, they refused to announce, like stuck-up children under the threat of loosing their big-bang toy, that solar gravity could be repelling electrons.

To "build" error-on-error, as they are in the nasty habit of doing, they claimed that solar-wind electrons achieve enough velocity that they can never be attracted back to the sun. They called it "escape velocity." They took this position as fight-back against the concept that gravity repels solar-wind electrons, the other option. Surely, somebody in the science establishment must have proposed that concept, eventually.

They are not correct about the following speed: "The escape velocity from the Sun at the surface is approximately 617.6 km/s (1,380,000 mph). This is the minimum speed an object needs to leave the Sun's gravitational pull and never return." Ya-but, aside from the fact that they cannot know the escape-velocity speed at the sun, solar-wind electrons do not fly away that fast, for they say: "The solar wind travels at speeds of around 1 million miles per hour."

They cannot know what the escape velocity is from the sun because they do not know the specific gravity force at the sun's surface. That's because they have an erroneous definition of gravity as the number of atoms in the sun. That is, they see gravity force as proportional to mass, as if gravity force were an integral part of atoms. In reality, gravity force is from electrons freed from atoms, BIG DIFFERENCE.

By the way, forget Einsteinian gravity, unless you want to progress from idiot to wild lunatic. "Idiot" is an under-statement.

The way they figure the speed of the solar wind is to see how long it takes for the physical effect of a solar flare to reach the earth. Once they time it, they use their erroneous solar distance of 93-million miles to figure the velocity. Therefore, they are saying that the solar wind takes about 93 hours to reach earth when travelling at a million miles per hour. But as the sun is not as far as 93 million, their velocity figure must be less than a million mph, wherefore their escape-velocity theory suffers even more when trying to explain why solar gravity doesn't pull its electrons back.

They have another problem that they don't want us to know: solar-wind electrons pick up speed (accelerate) as they progress from sun to earth. That's because electrons repel each other constantly. The constant push causes them, logically, undeniably, to accelerate one another. Therefore, even if they can be granted the speed of one million mph, that's an average speed, yet they need to confess that the speed at the sun must be less than a million mph while the speed at the earth's orbit is more than a million mph, wherefore the speed at the sun is well below their own escape-velocity speed.

In fact, this big problem of theirs can explain why they pegged the sun wrongly at 93-million miles away, as a best-possible case to explain the solar wind by escape-velocity. I was able to do something that amazed me using NASA data on lunar eclipses. I discovered that the sun is 18 million miles away or less. That undeniable fact makes escape-velocity even less likely to be the cause of the solar wind.

The absolute jerks that are the cosmic evolutionists love to revel in the "fact" that the high number of comet strikes on the moon's surface is utter evidence of millions of years of moon age. Ya-but, the older they claim for the moon's age, the more idiotic the idiots appear because, the longer time there is, the more comet skids we should see on the moon. I know of NOT ONE comet skid on the moon. A comet skid is when a comet flies to the lunar surface at a sharp angle so that it might skid or even bounce of the moon, creating a long ditch. In other sharp-landing comet events, we should expect oval-shaped craters. Alas, all lunar craters are generally round because the craters were not formed by comets.

What are we to believe, that astronomers have never realized what I've just told you? No, but in being evolutionist idiots, they lied to you. They know that the craters are formed by lava flows from interior molten material, but in such a case, the evidence for long ages vanishes.

Lookie: "Moon craters are PRIMARILY formed by the impact of asteroids and meteoroids with the lunar surface." PRIMARILY. That means, not always. How else are the craters formed? You see, they do know that craters can be formed, as they are on earth, by internal magma. In that case, we must conclude that ALMOST ALL craters on the lunar surface are not formed by large comets, for if a significant number were, even 20, we would expect at least three or four skid-made ditches or long-oval craters, and few other slightly-oval craters.

Over a billion years, one expects many comets or asteroids to scrape the ground before bouncing off back into space. No evidence can be seen for such events, that I know of, anyway. But, computer animations in conjunction with long-tern NASA plots can suddenly show such lunar scrapes to the public as the new "education," in attempts to keep the theory of cosmic evolution from becoming fully crippled.

The planet Mercury has a surface similar to that of the moon, with many perfectly-round craters best explained as magma flows. After the magma reaches maximum heights to form hardened walls all around, the still-molten material subsides, meaning that the "floor" of the crater goes back down in elevation to thus form a crater i.e. with higher edges all around. One would not expect perfectly-round craters if the magma fountain was on heavily-sloped land.

True Distance to the Sun Less than 18 Million Miles

Before you start mocking me for my 18-million-mile figure, you should look into how their 93-million figure was obtained. But you need to treat it critically rather than embrace it in full trust of evolutionary cosmologists / astronomers. You need to ask every question as to whether they did everything right in getting the 93-million figure. For one of those questions, you need to ask why they don't use eclipse data to figure the maximum distance to the sun, because that data will indeed cough up roughly 18 million miles.

Don't be a-scared of the fools. Use lunar-eclipse data from NASA to figure out your own distance to the sun, because the evolutionist quacks aren't going to do it for you only to expose that they are play-loose tramps with their 93-million figure. Using eclipse data, you can find the angle of the lunar-eclipse line from the edge of the earth umbra, past the edge of earth, to the edge of the sun.

The angle of the lunar-eclipse line is in comparison to a zero-degree line extending from the core of the earth's umbra, though the core of the earth, and finally to the core of the sun. You cannot find the angle of the eclipse line until you find the diameter of the earth's umbra when the moon travels through it (at any particular eclipse). NASA's data will tell the diameter of the umbra, not in miles, but in "apparent degrees," an astronomy phrase you need to be familiar with. You will need to figure out the umbra diameter in miles from the apparent-diameter figure. It's not difficult. I'll show you how. Apparent diameter is also called, "angular size" (= degrees of width).

NASA data DOES NOT tell you the distance to the moon in any eclipse data. I can glean why it won't cough up the lunar distance: because, it makes it very easy to find the angle of the lunar-eclipse line, and thus anyone could then discover the maximum solar distance as about 18 million miles.

You cannot have the angle of the lunar-eclipse line unless you first have both the umbra diameter in miles, and the distance to the moon at the eclipse.

Once you get the angle of the lunar-eclipse line, you use NASA data to get the angle of a second line to the edge of the sun. For this line, you use the apparent radius of the sun during the eclipse, given by NASA in minutes and seconds. I convert (use online converter) the minutes-seconds on the NASA page to degrees, and that figure alone, per eclipse, will be the angle of the second line that we're after. On NASA's eclipse pages, see the "S.D." figures for moon and sun, meaning "semi-diameter," a phrase meaning "radius."

Now that you have two lines going to the edge of the sun, you need only devise a means to discover how far from the earth the two lines will meet, for they both meet at the sun. The two lines do not begin at the same place upon the earth. The lunar-eclipse line begins at the edge of the earth, and the apparent-radius-of-the-sun line begins at the core of the earth. The two lines thus begin a little less than 4,000 miles apart, i.e. one earth radius apart.

You need only to find how many miles outward into space the two lines will extend before they close the 4,000-mile gap. The way to do this is to find how much the gap will decrease per mile outward into space. An expert geometrist will know how to find this, but as I figured it out on my own, without a special, geometry calculator, that's how easy this is to do.

The angle of the lunar-eclipse line will always be smaller than the angle of the apparent-radius-of-the-sun line. If the two lines were at the same angle, or if the lunar-eclipse line were the larger of the two angles, the two lines would never meet. But, of course, the two lines do meet because both are caused by sunlight coming from the edges of the sun. Draw it all on paper to get a feel for the challenges, and then use NASA data from any full-lunar eclipse.

Although NASA does not reveal the lunar distance to the moon during an eclipse, it does. But the fact remains, it doesn't reveal the distance in miles, as if it's hiding it from us. It would be a simple matter for NASA to provide the distance in miles / kilometers, yet it doesn't. Why do you think this is?

As I'm not an astronomer, it took me a long time to realize that one can find the distance to the moon using the apparent diameter of the moon. NASA gives the apparent semi-diameter of the moon at every lunar-eclipse page. For example, if the apparent diameter is .5 degree, it tells us that the moon is .5 degree of a 360-degree circle around the earth. Therefore, the math is: 360 / .5 = 720. That is, there will be 720 moons in a perfect circle around the earth, and so we then multiply 720 by 2,160 miles (the lunar diameter) to find the circumference of this imaginary circle. It works out to 1.555 million miles. This drawing shows what I'm doing here:
https://www.tribwatch.com/photos/eclipseDraw3MoonCircle.jpg

As every high-schooler knows, one can find the diameter of a circle if one has its circumference, as: circumference / pi. Using the figure above, it's 1.555 million miles / 3.14 = 495,200 miles. But we don't want the diameter of the circle when wanting the distance between the moon and the earth. Instead, we want the radius of the circle, and so the math above discovers that a .5-degree moon is 495,200 / 2 - 247,600 miles from earth.

Why have astronomers been so spineless as not to buck against the idiots by revealing the solar distance as found by eclipse data? Why have the idiots made idiots of all the astronomers? Although NASA data consistently got me a solar distance of 17 to 19 million miles after doing the math for about 10 different eclipses, the fact is that the distance is even less when one allows for the possibility that sunlight is re-directed (refracted) by the earth's atmosphere.

It would be nice for the lying evolutionists if the bending of light through the earth atmosphere allowed the math to get an unknown but larger distance than 18 million, but the fact is, it's the other way around. The bending-of-light factor, if it's even relevant to the angle of the lunar-eclipse line, gets an unknown number SMALLER than 18 million.

When sunlight strikes the atmosphere at the edge of the earth, the light, if it bends at all (this is air, not water), bends inward toward the earth such that the earth umbra is made less wide than would otherwise be the case. The larger the umbra, the closer the sun works out to be. Therefore, an umbra that shows smaller than it really is will mathematically figure a solar distance further than is the reality. That is, where the math / geometry using the made-smaller umbra gets 18 million, the real distance is less than 18 million. TOUGH LUCK, evolutionist LIARS.

At the end of 2021, when I was finally catching on as to how NASA data could be used for the quest of finding the solar distance, I calculated the following solar distances. After each distance figure, I give the angular size of the sun per the eclipse on the date shown. The larger the sun sizes shown, the closer the sun to earth per eclipse:

18.962 million; .52450: June 25, 1964 (calculation below)
16.015 million; .524554: July 16, 2000 (something is wrong here)
17.8777 million; .524832: June 15, 2011
17.188 million; .526277: May 26, 2021
17.63 million; .52661: August 17, 1989
18.207 million; .53144: April 15 2014
18.821 million; .5331: April 4, 2015
18.892 million; .5393: November 18, 1994
17.483 million; .544776: July 26, 1953

For the first offering on the above list, the solar size needs to be cut in half from .52450 degree to .26225. This latter figure is the angle of a line from the core of the earth to the edge of the sun where a zero-degree line is from earth core to solar core. The .26225-degree line cannot lie. That is, the angle cannot lead us astray on the solar-distance findings. It's full-proof over vast distances. It doesn't matter that the line is 19 million miles long, it is an accurate line in so much as the apparent radius of .26225 degree is correctly measured / stated by NASA.

The reason that the solar distances above are not all the same is partly due the impossibility of, and/or errors in, measuring the size of the sun perfectly, and partly because the sun is not always at the same distance, from month to month. Where the apparent solar sizes don't jibe with the distances found, the fault doesn't lie with me, my math, or my method. As you can see, all nine eclipses generally resulted in the same, ballpark distance where I introduced zero numbers to the tabulations. All I did was find a solar-distance method into which I plugged NASA's numbers.

Here's an example of the method, for the first entry in the list above, noting that you need to convert the umbra diameter into moon diameters:

Lunar eclipse of June 25, 1964:

umbra radius .6509 degree; umbra diameter 1.3018 degree
moon radius 14'43.2" (= .491388 degree diameter);
sun radius 15'44.2" (= .524554 degree diameter):
umbra diameter in moon diameters: 1.3018 / .491388 = 2.6492 moons;
umbra diameter in miles: 2.6492 x 2,159.26 = 5,720.4;
lunar-eclipse-line spread = 3,960 - (5,720.4/2) = 1,099.8 miles
obtain lunar distance: 360 / .491388 x 2,159.26 / 2pi = 251,770 miles
1,099.8 / 251,770 = .00436827 mile
obtain lunar distance imaginary moon: 360 / .524500 x 2,159.26 / 2pi = 235,875 miles
1,079.63 / 235,875 = .0045771;
.0045771 - .00436827 = .00020883 mile catch-up, per mile toward the sun;
then 3,960 / .00020883 = 18.962 million miles to the sun

You can repeat the math method above for any lunar eclipse. NASA gives all the needed data on it's lunar-eclipse pages.

You'll need an explanation of what I mean for the line above starting with "lunar-eclipse-line spread" and ending with "3,960 - (5,720.4/2) = 1,099.8 miles." The 3,960 figure is the radius of the earth; the 5,720.4/2 figure is the umbra radius, and the difference between the two, 1,099.8 miles, is the distance, on a lateral line, from the edge of the umbra to the edge of the earth.

It is not the distance from where the moon kisses the edge of the umbra to the edge of the earth, but rather is the distance from where the moon kisses the umbra, going in a lateral direction until the line is directly beneath the edge of the earth on your drawing. For example, when the umbra is at the bottom of the page with the earth directly above it, the 1099.8-mile line goes perfectly HORIZONTAL on the page, starting at the edge of the umbra where the moon kisses it, and ends when it's directly beneath the edge of the earth. The drawing below shows what I mean, where the lateral spread is shown as 1,015 miles for a lunar eclipse in the year 2,000:
https://www.tribwatch.com/photos/eclipseDraw2.jpg

In the drawing, the lunar-eclipse lines are the ones forming the umbra. The task is to find the angle for the bottom red line where the top red line is zero degrees.

For the eclipse under discussion here, the lunar-eclipse line spreads laterally 1,099.8 miles when extending sunward from the moon to the earth. You now have the angle of the lunar-eclipse line defined as spreading laterally 1,099.8 miles per every lunar distance toward the sun. Which lunar distance in particular? The one during the eclipse. This line can be easily converted to degrees at a right-hand-triangle calculator. Here's how:
https://www.tribwatch.com/photos/eclipseDraw4.jpg

However, the math method above doesn't need one to convert the lunar-eclipse line to degrees. Once you get the lateral lunar-eclipse line spread, you divide it by the distance between the core of the earth and the core of the moon. I showed you above how to calculate a lunar distance from earth for any eclipse. It's easy: 360 / .491388 x 2,159.26 / 2pi = 251,770 miles; where 360 is for a 360-degree circle; where .491388 is the moon's apparent diameter in degrees; where 2,159.26 is the NASA-given diameter of the moon.

For the eclipse under discussion, the related math is like so: 1,099.8 / 251,770 = .00436827 mile. What this does is to find that the lunar-eclipse line spreads .00436827 mile laterally per every mile toward the sun. It's exactly the same line angle as when it's expressed as 1,099.8 miles laterally per 251,770 miles toward the sun. But when need it expressed in per-mile in order to churn out the solar distance from earth, because the second line we are using won't have a lunar distance of 251,770.

When I did 1,099.8 / 251,770 = .00436827 mile of spread years ago, I didn't know that I was finding .00436827 radians, or "rads," in case you know what they are. If you enter 1099.8 into box 'a' at this
right-hand-triangle calculator, and then enter 251,770 in box 'b', you hit "calculate," then look upward on the page to the alpha line reading: "0.25° = 0°15'1" = 0.0043682 rad" It tells you the angle of the lunar-eclipse line in three different ways, as .25 degree, or 0 minutes, 15.1 seconds, or .004368215 unit (or mile) of lateral spread per one unit (or one mile) of forward distance.

Box 'b' represents line 'b', which in the case at hand is the zero-degree line from the moon's core at mid-eclipse through the center of the earth and finally through the center of the sun.

So, as it turned out, my high-school-level method uses rads to find the solar distance. It's practical and easy to understand. Once you have the knowledge that the lunar-eclipse line spreads laterally .00436827 mile per every mile toward the sun, you are laughing. At NASA's idiots. You are about to discover the true distance to the sun and make utter bozos of its imposters.

But first, you need the angle of a second line starting at the core of the earth and ending up at the edge of the sun at the moment of mid-eclipse. Here's a drawing I made for this task:
https://www.tribwatch.com/photos/eclipseDraw1.jpg

In the drawing, I have the solar-edge lines starting from the eye of a person standing on the earth's edge, but when NASA gives apparent sizes of suns, the solar-edge lines should perhaps be started at the earth's core. It's not going to make much of a difference, one way or the other, for the solar-distance figure, but just so you know. Of course, you need use of only one of the solar-edge lines, and one lunar-eclipse line.

NASA gives us the radius of the sun for the eclipse under discussion as .26225 degree. One can find the rads of this angle in any online converter, which works out to .0045771 rads. If you go up to my math method above, you will see: 1,079.63 / 235,875 = .0045771. Therefore, the method I used to find .0045771 is a correct method. Let me tell you how I did it, how I arrived at the operation, 1,079.63 / 235,875. If you're wondering what the 235,875 number refers to, it's a second distance to an imaginary moon that represents the real sun at the moment of mid-eclipse.

I pretended that the sun during the eclipse is a second moon. Am I allowed to do that? YES. My only task was to find the angle of the line going from earth core to edge of sun, and that angle is identical to a line going from earth core to a moon exactly the size of the sun at mid-eclipse. See that? This "apparatus" escaped me for more than a decade, though I wasn't working diligently on this problem for all that time.

The diameter of the sun, during the eclipse, was .5245 degree, and so I pretended that the solar ball was a moon of that same diameter. I could then discover how far from the earth the sun is, not only because we know the moon's true diameter of 2,159.26 miles, but because we can find the moon's distance from knowing any apparent moon size while NASA tells us which apparent size to use: the apparent size of the sun at mid-eclipse. See that? How fortuitous was it for me to find this apparatus that every seasoned astronomer knows off the skin of his hands? Lucky enough to get some good laughs toward the apes stuck in blind lalaland. No pity deserved.

To put this another way that should enlighten you, in case I've lost you with the sun-moon trick, the angle of a line, starting at your eye, to the edge of the moon is identical to the angle of a line to the edge of the sun when the sun and moon are back-to-back in a perfect solar eclipse, where both are of identical size to the eye. Therefore, I need find only the angle of one to get the angle of the other, and as I don't know the true diameter of the sun, or it's distance from earth, I obviously chose to find the angle using the moon's particulars.

The math is like so where the diameter of the sun during the eclipse is .5245 degree: 360 / .5245 x 2,159.26 / 2pi = 235,875 miles from earth core to moon's core. You saw that same math above when seeking the earth-moon distance from mid-eclipse, when finding the angle of the lunar-eclipse line. This latest math finds the distance to the the imaginary moon by knowing its apparent size of .5245 degree.

The next math, in using the moon-distance figure above, is: 1,079.63 / 235,875 = .0045771 mile. The 1,079.63 figure is the lunar radius. We are trying to find how far a line will spread laterally if, at the moment of the eclipse, we start it at the earth's core and extend it along the moon's edge toward the sun's edge. As the line starts on the zero-degree line through the cores of the earth and moon, we want to use only the lunar radius, not the diameter, for this operation. And so we find that the line spreads .0045771 mile laterally per every 235,875 miles toward the sun. But it's too complicated to leave things at that; we want to know the line spread per ONE MILE toward the sun. Get it?

We already have the lunar-eclipse-line spread per one mile toward the sun; having the same for the solar-edge line is like banana pie to the face of a backward, fantasizing astronomy baboon. These damned liars who never went to the moon are working hard to "debunk" those who know the truth, by trying to lump us in with flat-earthers. These Godless dreamers who invent black holes, rolling space-time, and other impossible fantasies are lunatics now poised to make the world believe that they have found inhabitable other-planets and alien life. It's evolutionist hog-wash.

We can call the second line the solar-edge line. The lunar-eclipse line was shown to spread .004368215 mile laterally per each mile toward the sun. That's .0045771 mile for the solar-edge line versus .0043682 mile for the lunar-eclipse line. It means that the solar-edge line spreads laterally .0045771 - .0043682 = .00020883 mile more than the lunar-eclipse line, per mile toward the sun. Sooner or later, the two lines will meet.

The lunar-eclipse line is to be viewed as starting at the earth's edge, one earth radius from where the solar-edge line begins. Both start at the same starting line, i.e. the same distance from the sun. Therefore, when the solar-edge line has closed the gap by one earth radius, 3,960 miles, that's where the two lines meet. The final math operation is therefore: 3,960 / .00020883 = 18.962 million miles to the sun. Give or take a couple of cubits.

Did you see what was done in that final operation? The two lines begin 3,960 miles apart, and the solar-edge line moves toward the lunar-eclipse line by .00020833 mile per every one mile toward the sun. Therefore, the solar-edge line has moved 3,960 miles toward the lunar-eclipse line after the two lines have extended in the forward direction by 18,962,000 miles.

God has a Hot Day for their recompense, when every knee shall bow to Jesus, the Eternal Ruler over CREATION. Not evolution, wicked clowns, but CREATION by the Almighty. You cannot fathom how mighty He is. You shouldn't want to get on His bad side.

I'm writing this section in case anyone wants to know my method enough to check it out for themselves, to verify its accuracy or to debunk it. I'll give NASA details also for another eclipse not on the list of nine above:

Eclipse of July 26, 1953

umbra radius = .7496 degree;
moon radius 16'20.6" = .544776 degree
sun radius 15'45.0" = .5250 degree
umbra diameter in miles: 5,933.4
lunar-eclipse-line spread: 3,960 - 5,933.4/2 = 993.3 miles
lunar distance: 360 / .544776 x 2159.26 / 2pi = 227,096 miles
993.3 / 227,096 = .00437392 mile lateral spread per mile toward sun
lunar distance for imaginary moon: (360 / .5250 x 2159.26 / 2pi = 235,650 miles
1,079.63 / 235,650 = .0045815 mile lateral spread per mile toward sun
.0045815 - .00437392 = .00020758 mile catch-up, per mile toward the sun
then, 3,960 / .00020758 = 19.076 million miles to the sun

I've gone over and over this method for many eclipses, and cannot see one thing I'm doing wrong. I therefore trust that this is accurate work. It's not easy to believe that I'm the first person to use these numbers in this straight-forward way. I therefore think that there's been a cover-up where people have used this eclipse-line method or something similar, shown it to their astronomical bosses, but were told to hush-up for one reason or another at the pain of being defamed, or at one other threat or another.

On the other hand, it is possible that the use of the imaginary moon has not occurred to anyone who was in the meantime using eclipse lines to find the distance to the sun. It seems to me that many astronomers could easily glean that one can find the distance to the sun by following two eclipse lines to the sun. Along with a lunar-eclipse line, the trick is to find an appropriate second line. For years (over a decade), I was hoping to find an appropriate solar-eclipse line, from some solar eclipse, as the second line, but then realized I could make my own imaginary solar eclipse, i.e. with the imaginary moon, making the latter's size as per the exact size of the sun on the day/minute of any lunar-eclipse that itself was lending the lunar-eclipse line. PERFECT. It works to make a perfect second line, and I can see no way to discredit the use of the lunar-eclipse line as I've used it.

NEWS

If you think about it, it's better if the Liberals are in power while the Tariff of Nottingham makes more lame the canadian economy, as opposed to Poilievre being in power only to see the Liberal state media pulverize him for being unable to keep Trump at bay. carney will now get the blame, in Conservative podcasting, for Trump's tariff hammer, and the state media will have nothing to say about carney's valiant fight against Trump, because there'll be nothing valiant about it, my prediction. carney has already gone soft in his "fight" against Trump tariffs, it's all over canadian news from podcasters. The better half of Canadians are blaming the worst half for the carney crisis, meaning that Liberals have ruined the country to the point of moaning like when birth pangs increase in intensity and frequency.

Loblaws would like us to believe that Trump's tariffs are to blame for its promised food-price increases, happening imminently. Ya-but, high food costs due to tariffs are due to canada's tariffs on American foods coming in. Ya-but, the Liberals are lying to us again. canada has had high food prices due to tariffs for a long time, meaning that Liberals have been taxing foods via tariffs even though they know it's immoral to tax foods.

Poilievre doesn't want Alberta separation because he'll never become prime minister without the Conservative vote in Alberta, which may explain why he's going to get an Alberta seat, to oppose separatists from that province. If Alberta becomes its own nation, Conservatives in the east will be the chained dog that merely barks all day and night without remedy.

By week's end, a new poll has 45-percent of Albertans wanting separation. Someone says that a Calgary poll hit 51-percent.

Here's a report on Trump's art-of-the-steal deal with Ukraine, with a pro-Trump panel:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=To_y6tT1J8Y

American tax money to the Ukraine war was not for the purpose of intruding into rare minerals inside Ukraine. The Ukrainians were not told that this would be the end of the matter. It looks as though the United States allowed Ukrainians to be killed in the war, and maimed, in order to eventually force the Ukraine leader to sign away the rocks, once the country is on the verge of wholesale destruction. This is despicable. It's not art; it's raw extortion of the worst kind typical of the CIA-and-military projects in other countries.

It also appears as though the American people in general paid for the war only to allow a few, select corporations to make money from the mined products. In the meantime, it doesn't end American conflict with the Russians, but throws the Russians into the arms of China, a world-war situation that becomes more problematic as China worms into canadian power structures.

mark carney is fast working to use election fraud to eke out a majority government in canada, in case you haven't heard. That scenario assures the Liberals have at least five years in power, and during that time, he's likely to reinforce Chinese power structures in the country. When property prices soar, so do the trees and all other building materials, like clamp on clamp around your wrists and ankles, making you a prisoner of their financial brutalities. Keep in mind that the speakers in the video below are not allowed, by youtube, to outright claim election fraud. Note too that the public is not allowed to see the critical ballots involved in the recount:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKUQLa6_rVA

The update on the story above is that the Bloc, which lost by one vote in the "judicial recount," has found one or more viable ballots for their party such that the end result should either be a tie, or a Bloc win, but the chief of Elections canada refused to allow the Bloc ballot(s) to count, wherefore the Bloc party is saying they will take it to court. Clearly, Elections Canada is a pro-Liberal animal, as could be expected.

The problem with anti-Carney podcasters is that they fill your head with carney news in efforts to hold the high youtube algorithm and/or to keep the $$$ flowing in. They can make it sound exciting for you to keep up on carney news. Fox does the same to its viewers with a constant open tap on pukey Bidenite news. The least they can do is simply tell us what carney or Biden said rather than show their faces with their own slippery words, which makes viewers feel sick due to the fact that these men surround themselves with sociopaths.

Christians, I think you need to view Elon Musk as the dread enemy of God and His future. In his future, no truckers, many less people needed to do the work, and for this reason Musk loves the concept of "universal basic income"...as the first step to murdering people systematically when they are deemed a useless / fruitless government expense. Musk is not headed slowly to Mars, but fast the Hell. I still wonder whether he could be the False Prophet, which would work much better if he were to suddenly tout a Christian facade:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6kvZnXSuDI

The latest in a promised string of Epstein revelations from James O'Keefe is due Wednesday of this week. I share the video below as per artwork from Tony Podesta, to show how there is a very sick "order" of sex-crazed lunatics in Liberal, American politics, otherwise I regret my part in showing the related, unchristian topics in this video, if you are unaccustomed to them, and bothered by them. This video shows the "temple" on Jeffrey Epstein's island, and so one can ask whether child/teen sacrifices were conducted there:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ML4sGEls7pM

The O'Keefe video below can suggest that Pam Bondi was forced to admit, last week, that the "Epstein files" have "tens of thousands of videos" with children or child porn. The reason that she may have been forced to admit this is because, shortly before the admission, someone (O'Keefe's employee?) supposedly caught her telling the same thing to someone sitting in a restaurant with her. That fortuitous video-and-audio capture is shown in the video below, but I'm wondering whether Bondi planned to leak that info at the restaurant due to Trump being unwilling to release even the knowledge of this vast trove of Epstein-related child porn. If so, good for Pam Bondi, lots of good credit for that move.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bchrKeP2IUc

At the start of John Campbell's video below, note that the rocketing physical ailments and deaths begin in 2021, the year of the vaccines, not in 2020, the year of the COVID scare (= faked pandemic).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7g38Mf9UY7w

The video tells that the products intended by mRNA injections lands in the heart, for example, causing the body's immune system to attack the heart, and killing more than 1 out of every 300 vaccinated people. If COVID itself affected 1 out of 300 people, almost all of them would have survived, most of them with little pain, but even if they had pain for a week, or two, that's a lot better than dying by an attack on the heart...or other vital organs. Where is the justice? Why has this world of people become so carelessly / insistingly violent? One per 300 is a rough number from reported cases only.

Most politicians still cater to mRNA vaccinations, and even Del Bigtree says that the choice should be the person's choice even though he knows of the dangers. What sort of an idiot takes a politically "safe" position like that instead of begging people to stay away from these vaccines?

In the 20th minute of the video above, we learn that mRNA products are yet "floating" in the body" up to two years after vaccination. There's no excuse for trudeau, for he knew of these dangers, and thus he deserves the electric chair because he failed to tell the people, and because he implored children to become vaccinated that he and his friends might become rich off of "free" vaccine sales (paid by tax money). The video's 20th minute has a speaker claiming long-term damage, meaning that more deaths are as-yet forthcoming but DIRECTLY caused by vaccinations. Here's a follow-up video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSYO9fs9Xg0

Not all vaccine does were poisoned. Where the "trick" is to kill a massive number of people with a universally-enforced vaccine program, only a few does need to come with poison, or sufficient mRNA spike proteins that the dosage becomes poisonous. It was reported that about 4-percent of vaccine batches were significantly-to-extremely dangerous. Four-percent of the batches is not necessarily four-percent of all doses (it could be more).

The carney government has decided to skip giving voters a budget, suggesting that the Liberals don't want people to know what they plan to spend money on, expected if they want to pay back, illegally, the corporations and individuals who gave/give the party the largest election and on-going support. Thus, the Liberals will use tax money to make their government more thick, like an iron club. They have already added an enormous number of new cabinet posts that didn't exist previously. BIG GOVERNMENT. Corruption, as usual. If you want to see the EMPTY "argument" for justifying the skipping of the budget:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42XZz4cn2iI

The excuse for not making a budget is because they want their summer vacation instead. Ya-but, nobody in government has been working for months, ever since trudeau shut down the Parliament, and now they want their 3-month vacation starting the beginning of June??? These louses can postpone their vacation until after the budget is made. That way, they can damn themselves by exposing their intentions with the treasury. "Canadian Cabinet ministers typically have vacation periods during the summer adjournment, which usually lasts for about 12 weeks..." Royal softies, blood-sucking louses.

carney said he's "delivering" $800 of tax cuts annually per two-person family, or $400 per worker. BIG DEAL. That crumb will be more than eaten up by carney's carbon taxes on corporations (when the latter pass the taxes onto consumers with higher product prices). Gas cars are being made very expensive so that this wee-wee tax cut is a slap in the face.

Pierre Poilievre offered more than twice as much as the amount above, yet he was also promising a vanishing of all carbon taxes. he was also showing a viable plan to reduce rents and home prices. Therefore, Liberal voters have made their own lives much harder, like drudgery, full of moaning, rejecting a far-better scenario just because they have allowed themselves to be programmed to hate Conservatives.

This issue is putting the CBC and CTV between a rock and a hard place, because the more they support the Liberals when they do villainous things, the more they lose viewers. The irony is where the CBC and CTV are the ones who brainwash Liberals into hating Conservatives. These media brainwash the viewer into thinking that the role of government is to "deliver" things to the people. This is communist disaster for a country, where government becomes an evil genie taking money from you to pay for someone else's expenses whom the government wants to buy as voters. MOAN.

When Conservatives talk about shrinking government, they mean spending less, and therefore taxing less, but then the CBC and CTV accuse them of TAKING MONEY AWAY from the people. That is, Conservatives are portrayed as stealing tax dollars from the people that Liberals have already committed to granting. Therefore, these media are the ruin of the country, turning the people into wanting, little children expecting continual hand-outs, a policy that becomes unbearable when immigrants adopt the same expectations and thus support Liberal communism.

I believe in charity from governments to the poor and aged. But why should I pay a family to send their kids to day care? Why should I pay for someone's abortion? On and on this undermining policy goes, to no end, as Liberals literally buy their voters while making the tax burden progressively heavier. But it has become harsh now that Liberals have caused product and home prices to soar in accordance with the WEF policy of weakening citizens, making them unable to fight back against dictatorial WEF globalism for fear that they might literally become unable to put food on the table. When we accuse Liberals of being destroyers, they prefer to think we're just speaking exaggerations.

No sooner did carney "win" the election that news comes out wherein his company, Brookfield Assets, has purchased a canadian pipeline. carney will say he's no longer with Brookfield, but he's fooling only his naive voters. In the meantime, his cabinet says that there will be no new pipelines built in canada, meaning that the carney government is keeping Brookfield's western competition in the poor house.

The 5th minute of this ostrich-murder story has an aspect not in other reports on this story. It seems that the rotten, pro-vaccine canadian government is killing the ostriches to keep the owner from discovering a health break-through (man, I really hate the "musical" ending on Dan Dicks videos):
https://www.bitchute.com/video/4G1ubLk6xZEs

There's almost 400 parliamentarians in Ottawa. All we got to do is find two of them that had COVID four years ago, and we can justify culling all of them. I'm very sure the garbage dumb will happily take their corpses, sick or unsick.

Someone writes what I feel too: "spiritually i have left this country ... my body is just grinding through the gears of this abysmal physical situation .. i never thought in my wildest dreams that Canada would ever be so oppressed by insincere politicians .. pray ... ONLY JESUS CHRIST SAVES .. that is where my spirit shall reside .. to be absent from the body is to present with THE LORD .. not storing up treasures here in this fallen world".

Dan Bongino and Kash Patel, in my opinion, have both already become deep-state obedient, presumably in order to keep their jobs at the FBI, but also possibly to keep on Trump's "good" side. If these two aren't talking, and if they are lying about what we know they would really like to tell the truth about, I'd suggest that Trump is "asking" them to go with the deep-state line, the lie; you decide:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJh5p2HfFn8

James Comey put out an "8647" message this week saying that he wants Trump assassinated. It comes just as Kash Patel is poised to release the Crossfire Hurricane documents that supposedly condemn Comey's FBI. By the looks on Kash's face, on Maria of Fox news, it should condemn Comey's and Wray's FBI.

If you'd like to see an up-to-date, soft-on-Trump assessment of the American deep state's fight against Trump's picks for the Department of Justice:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FHyAD-QX-M

carney's a shyster with crook's teeth:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWKA7v7mjhE

canada allows big-corporate price-fixing as a rule:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_9e_2uhX0Y

---

NEXT UPDATE

Here's all four Gospels wrapped into one story.

For Some Prophetic Proof for Jesus as the Predicted Son of God.
Also, you might like this related video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3EjmxJYHvM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efl7EpwmYUs

Pre-Tribulation Preparation for a Post-Tribulation Rapture

---