March 4 - 10, 2025
I'm not going to comment on the video below, which strikes out against some churches practicing strings of systemized tactics. This topic can be confusing, but it's of extreme importance to know the truth. I myself am confused or unsure about it, which is why I won't comment. I'll let you contemplate the things said, whether the speaker is always correct or not, or whether his motives (or main part of the argument) are in the truthful direction:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kS2O1SqBHBoThere are teachers who will teach that fear of Jesus is a bad thing, antagonistic to Faith. Fear of God in Old Testament times intends to keep the person CAREFUL to do the right things when confronted with the choice of good and evil. Why shouldn't that same element be in effect under the Covenant of Jesus?
"Careful" means the onus is on us to obey. Jesus died to give us a second chance to OBEY, and though God exercises grace, we should not pollute it by trampling it with filthy feet. So, BE CAREFUL. Watch the deceptiveness of our small hearts. It is not hard to refrain from many of the evil inclinations that afflict Godless men, once we become aware of our own filthy ways by the Light of Jesus. It is not hard, but a pleasure, to do good to others, when Jesus gives Himself to us. Have an abundant life, be charitable to people. Consider giving individuals your offerings set aside for God, rather than to organizations. Take the time to find needy people who will not squander your gifts on booze, cigarettes, or a weekend at a hotel.
Anyone with fear of Jesus has made Jesus happy when that fear makes the person get closer to Him. The response from Jesus would be something like, "do not fear." So, fear of Jesus gets satisfaction from God if the one fearing is deeply considering why he/she is fearing. If the person fears that they are not doing enough for Jesus, then that fear can motivate them to doing more. Tell me how Jesus would argue against this development. He wouldn't. If fear makes a servant serve more, that's a good thing because peace is the result of serving in any capacity where the person seeks to please God. Fear turns into peace when God lavishes love on the servant. Therefore, do not fear temporarily fearing. Let it do its work. You are not falling away if you fear out of concern for your standing before God. It's good to tell God you're afraid when you are.
God's not going to say, "Aha, I've caught you fearing that you might lose your salvation. Away with you, into the outer darkness." Instead, He's going to say, "I love you." Go to God in your fears, cry if it's bad enough, and be coddled. Do what you think you should to make Him happier with you, because that leads to the super-human feat that Jesus is calling us to, made possible by the Spirit as coach in our beings (acts very subtly), the one who keeps us CAREFUL to choose the right. CONQUERORS.
Yet there are teachers who would say that if you try to serve God better, you are acting in the "flesh," such a stupid and reckless teaching. Acting in the "flesh" is sinning, choosing the wrong thing, but whoever chooses to serve God in any way is not sinning. God's not going to say, "Aha, you've been caught trying to help an old lady cross the street, away with you, for you have fallen from grace."
Everytime we choose the right over the wrong, God chalks up rewards in Heaven, and sometimes it also results in gifts / surprises while in the body, often spiritual gifts. If I told my tenant that I'll reduce rent by $400 per month, he/she will be very nice to me, more than naturally, whether he/she likes me much or not, just for the money. That's one reason that God wouldn't answer every gimmie-gimmie prayer we have. And when we choose the wrong over the right too much, that's why we may feel a cold shoulder from God. This treatment is no secret, it's all over the Bible. God wants the natural us, the true us, but He also wants us to fix our wavering / betraying hearts, if we have such a heart.
I'd suggest that when Peter denied Jesus, it was a form of betrayal. The only good news is that he didn't fail for something he could gain in return, but because his courage fainted, because he didn't want to suffer the same fate as Jesus, on that murderous night. Peter had a deep sense that Jesus was in deep trouble when he denied Him. So long as Jesus was protecting him, he was willing to slash his sword about valiantly, but after Jesus was arrested, Peter's courage left him.
It's hard to have faith when we think God is not with us, which is why I talk to God to keep Him with me, and why I say things to let Him know I'm still with Him, on His side, and why I let Him know that He means everything to me, and to everyone else. Try it, you'll like it if you approve of God's nature, and of His intentions.
Ask: do I want to love in a world where the Law is to be good? If so, then you should want it eternally, and so you never want to abandon God for something like the modern world. God is showing what the world will be when people abandon Him such that He does almost nothing to salvage it from the fruits of evil. God continues to let the world go round, saves it from extreme disasters, but also allows the people to see the terrible results of evil. God allows evil to serve as witness to evil mankind, and so we should not ask, "how can a loving God allow such evil things" as if we don't have an answer. If God saved the world from all evils resulting from evil people, how could there be a proper exposure of evil? People would continue to do evil if God didn't allow the results of evil people.
Three of us had church last night when my new tenant and I were talking about the Bible. This tenant is new to Jesus, and my joy and love overflowed to hear what was being said, like when Jesus said that there is more joy in Heaven (especially in God's heart) when the one lost sheep comes back to Jesus. You can't separate that joy from love, for they are banded together in that situation. I had put out an ad asking for a Christian tenant, and this time it was successful (not the previous two times). The third person who had church with us last night is Jesus. "Where two or more are gathered in my name," He said," there am I in their midst." We had church. We were both the "preachers," we were building each other up. Go be with a Christian today, eat together, and have church.
I don't mind music at church at all, but motive means everything. I prefer good music because it's easier to sing to, more pleasurable to sing to, than when it sounds lousy. There is nothing wrong with finding pleasure or emotion in song. But turning a church into a stage with expert lighting, and with more emphasis on the sound system than necessary, that looks like some wrong motives. Imagine all the churches competing on how "good" the stage looks. Church takes place where you speak to someone, wherever you are, about Jesus. When you love someone's faith, happy for their salvation. Oneness in Jesus. When you send words up to God in your secret place, that's where worship takes place. Our Christian lives do not take place in a one-hour church "service."
There some people who feel that if a church "service" doesn't include the salvation message, it's somehow falling short. In my opinion, it's moronic (not trying to be offensive) to preach the simple salvation message over and over when Christians know it already. What's the use? Paul spoke this very thing, and said, in effect, move on to feeding the sheep some heavier meals. Salvation is the first step, edifying is the second.
Feeling the Spirit is nice, but don't seek it profusely as though hooked on a drug high. Let God move in you when He will, and He moves in us when we are worthy of it, or if we move Him. Speaking to Him genuinely moves Him, unless what we do in life disappoints Him. How do I know? It's all over the Bible, across thousands of years in his dealings with Israel. Jesus told us that he wants to coddle Israel, and you are a part of Israel if you are in the Vine.
By "coddle," I mean as a hen covers her chicks with its feathers. Webster's definition: "to treat with extreme or excessive care or kindness." Ya-but, why can't the same word have a positive version: "to treat with high care when needed." Or what about: "to enter God's shade because He likes it." The way I see it, anti-Christ's don't want parents to "coddle" their children because the anti-Christs want to rob their young minds at the earliest opportunities to turn them into demonoids going into adult life.
There are some very "genius" phrases going around that we should watch out for as Christians try to put their fingers on all that's wrong with churches, but let's keep in mind that the numbers of criticisms are due to the fact that there are countless churches. Sure, problems are bound to be many. Here's one "genius" stab at what's wrong with churches: "The gospel is not 'giving your life to Christ'. The gospel is that 'Christ gave his life for you.' Believe it!" This is silly, but would get heretical if pushed as a tenant. Both are true, both go together; why try to cancel the one half of it for saving the other half? Jesus says, anyone who gives himself to Me will be saved.
The video below is on the cheapness of churches today, but what surprised me is the claim that church attendance decreased enormously since the plandemic, and hasn't been restored. That says something. It tends to tell that Christians were upset with the way pastors facilitated the plandemic, without a peep for fear of offending those who carried pro-vaccine ignorance as if it were a holy cow:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xjq9aXVsv3k
NEWS
Reuters has a claim that Egypt has an alternative plan for Gaza's restoration that forsakes Hamas, and may even ignore Palestinians as a whole. This picture is conducive to the invasion of Egypt by the "king of the north" beginning in Daniel 11:25. That is, I expect that the anti-Christ will oppose Israel with many Arabs at the time he invades Egypt successfully.
The solution for Gaza is to give it to the legal jurisdiction of Israel, same as the West Bank. Israeli police need to be inside Gaza continually, to keep Gazans from rising up. If any Gazans don't like it, they can move away. Israel would need to be kind to this new Gaza to facilitate good feelings between Gazans and the Israeli government. Trump needs to stay out, for he's developing into a thieving parasite.
Late this week, the new Syrian regime was "slaughtering" Alawites of Syria after a military effort from the latter. Churches should be sending out the message for Christians to flee the domains once held by Seleucids, but many church leaders do not respect Daniel 11 as pertaining to an end-time prophecy. It says that the anti-Christ will be a neo-Seleucid ruler. Therefore, Christian newscasters need to warn Christians to get out of that region that stretches from Baghdad to Antioch. I don't know of anyone making such warnings.
This week, I heard that Russia is still in negotiations with the new Syrian regime, for the purpose of keeping Russian military bases in the country. One wonders what the Russians are offering, or prepared to grant, to Syria.
To put this another way, Reuters claims that Egypt is now abandoning the previous plan to have Palestinians run Gaza, and as such it seems Egypt is abandoning the "two state solution." That's going to get the ire of all anti-Israeli Arabs. We may hear them say something like "death to Egypt." Here's the Reuters article:
https://www.reuters.com/world/egypts-alternative-trumps-gaza-riviera-aims-sideline-hamas-2025-03-03/Chief justice Roberts, and Amy Coney-Barrett, both voted with the Democrats to temporarily block Trump's cancellations of USAID payments. The only good news is that Kavanaugh didn't go radical on this one. No need to watch the entire video here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSGlYxjns5IThey are saying (story above) that the USAID money needs to be paid to those who had a contract to receive it, but this doesn't mean that Bondi can't sue the people who gave this money if it's being given and/or received with fraud and/or corruption. Such laws suits would moreover discover the mechanisms of the fraud.
Some legal analysts are saying that the supreme court did not give Trump a permanent loss on this issue, and that Trump can bring it back to the top court once the lower (anti-Trump) court specifies payment details and/or payees. Trump's lawyers and the top court can then analyze the reasons / motives for the lower court's decision.
In the last two weeks, I claimed that a bra on a laundry line pointed both to money laundering and Amy Coney-Barrett. This week, we have Coney-Barrett voting on behalf of money laundering by USAID, making my claim look like it's correct (not looking for praise). It then asks whether she will once again vote on behalf of laundered money when the next case gets to the top court. The bra event suggested that USAID is in silent partnership with the Council on Foreign Relations.
Trump is HAPPY to report that two ports at the Panama canal have been purchased from Chinese control by...Blackrock, the globalist, pro-Woke, control-freakish beast despised by his voters. Has Trump criticized Blackrock? If not, why not? Is Blackrock lined up, maybe first in line, to undertake Ukraine's rocks? Trump made it sound as though he wanted the United States to own the canal, but Blackrock is not the United States. What's this tell us about Trump? It seems that Trump was placing Blackrock in a position to make this deal. The purchase of those two ports reportedly allows Blackrock to oversee almost half of the entire canal. How is it good for the world to make the giant dragons more gigantic? I think this is a lesson learned: bottomless-pit Trump want to be in bed with Blackrock, maybe to gobble up more parts of the world together.
On the one hand, Trump claims that tariffs are good for America, yet on the other hand he's cancelling tariffs if the neighbors do their border-security work efficiently. Ya-but, if they're good, then they should be applied regardless of border health. In reality, Trump is using the border card in case tariffs turn out to boomerang bad politics against him, when hurt American companies cry out that he's hurting them to help other American companies. Duh. I wonder, which companies is Trump seeking to help with tariffs? Just imagine the chaos he's unleashing where the companies don't know how to plan for their immediate future as Trump dangles tariffs, maybe yes, maybe no, maybe less, maybe more. What a heap of trash this man is. Look at how he's kinda saying, "I was only joking":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFomxxn0TJ0This heap of trash wants to blame foreign nations for treating the United States badly where their only crime is selling their products to companies in the United States i.e. American companies that buy the products WILLINGLY. The companies call the foreign companies by phone, and place orders. What are the foreign companies supposed to say, "Oh no, can't sell to you, that would be stealing from America, Trump says so."
He's so stupid that he timed the tariffs just as he's stacking the unemployment departments with DOGE-fired government workers. He's creating a political whirlwind on his own self. STUPID MAN. Stick to punishing the deep state and other tax-thieving criminals, and you will win politically, STUPID. He never tells how other countries are "ripping off" the United States because they aren't. It's a false accusation to allow his most immoral voters to play stupid by agreeing. The more the people lambaste him on this issue, the more he wants to take canada by force to show himself supreme, the winner. Is this not a lunatic? Democrats are gaining political points back as we speak, and past Trump supporters in canada are running away from him. Worse, they are now like a pack of hyenas attacking a lone wolf.
When Pam Bondi is captured on a normal camera, she is not very attractive. Age has taken its toll to vanish her youthfulness. But on the camera in the video below, she's beautiful, like a fresh 20-year old. It's got to be by a computer-enhanced camera. The owner of this video shot, Fox news, is a brutal idiot, not knowing enough not to show the viewer a huge close-up of Epstein. Fox does this all the time, as do many pro-Trumpers who think their audience will watch more videos when they show pictures of the villains. It's a twisted world, don't trust these people, keep eyes open for the signs that expose newscaster who deserve no respect. Note that Bondi wears a cross jewel:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6OsqI2yzZsWhen we left off last Friday, Bondi and Patel said they ordered the New York FBI office to deliver all the Epstein files by Friday morning, and the video above claims that this promise was kept, though we may not have heard about it if there had not been such a strong backlash against Bondi all-weekend long. But we are not yet to celebrate because the pressure from the guilty is on Patel not to reveal the main or hideous guilt. If Patel cannot be persuaded by the guilty, they will attack Bondi to force him, as his boss, to comply with their wishes. We should know within weeks how much Patel and Bondi will betray the people, if at all, in order to keep themselves safe.
If the next revelation doesn't have the scarlet parts of Epstein's operations, there will be onslaught against Patel, even though the fault may lie with the New York office because it's withholding the scarlet parts.
The so-called "influencers" that the FBI / Bondi chose last week give appearances that the FBI and Bondi together are mocking Trump voters with a deliberate tease. The very term chosen, "influencers," suggests that they are trying to portray pro-Trumpers as those who can be easily swayed to believe in mere theories i.e. lies. It signals that there's nothing scarlet to be had, because it's going to be withheld. But that was the plan as of last week; we may be entering a better situation this week.
Bondi has a major strike against her for advancing the "influencers" clowns. It's telling us she's willing to deceive Trump voters if she can get away with it. PUSHOVER. her job is not over when the files are made public. She needs to prosecute, but even then she can deceive the people by contacting the guilty and telling them, "don't worry," i.e. she's deliberately losing all court cases. The pressure on her will only build during the prosecutions. If she can't take the job, blame it on Trump for nominating her, and she should step aside for a ferocious lion to take her place whose got government-paid security protecting his home 24/7.
The FBI was in Epstein's home on his island in the Virgin Islands. That sphere falls under the CIA, meaning that John Ratcliffe (CIA chief) and Tulsi Gabbard (DNI) need to chime in on their Epstein files.
What did the FBI find in any of his homes? Where's the blackmail videos and blackmail letters? What did the FBI conclude about his spy rings, his accumulated money, his ties to his banks, and on and on it goes. What efforts did the FBI make to conduct arrests? Why didn't it arrest anyone but Ghislaine Maxwell? What discussions did the FBI have with the guilty, or those who partnered with the guilty? Why didn't the FBI investigate Epstein's friends and unofficial partners? Therefore, Pam Bondi needs to arrest many FBI and CIA people for giving aid and comfort to this criminal ring. That's what the people want to see, unless pro-Trumpers start to clamor to let this whole thing die because it makes Trump look bad. It sure does.
Trump has the option of finding any one person who will swear to do what needs to be done, put him in charge over Bondi as a temporary appointment until the Senate votes in his official nomination to replace her, even if it takes fours years because the official nominations, one after the other, are other men who swear to Trump to do what needs to be done, come assassination or not. There are zealous people willing to risk it. Trump may have picked Bondi knowing she's more a rabbit than a lion...but, if true, she could prove him wrong. I'm giving her more time.
The Ukraine situation is now becoming clearer after the dust of last week is settling. Europe wants the war to continue in order to get Russia out of the Donbas so that Europe can seize the rare-earth rocks of that area rather than the United States alone. Europe will seize the rocks as part of Ukraine's payback for war money to defeat Russia, and then there are also rebuilding $$$ for Europe to be had.
The other part of the settled dust is that Trump is trying to worm in to get the rocks by a different method, earlier than the scheme above, by forcing Russia to sign a peace deal. This is the better solution because it saves the horrors of war. However, it reveals that Trump does not want peace but as a tool to seize the rocks, for he resists / refuses to do a peace deal apart from Ukraine signing over the rocks. Trump, the duplicitous jerk. Calling a spade a spade.
Everywhere he turns, Trump is a thief, never charitable. A video title this week: "NordStream 2 Re-Launch: US and Russia in Talks to Restart Gas Transit, US to "Own" the Pipeline." He's just a big sinful sucking machine for American corporations. Do not be deceived when he says that Ukraine's rocks are a payback for the American people, for it's going to big corporations. He's a slime attached to the flesh of big corporations. The money that Ukraine "owes" to American tax payer is going to big corps.
Under Kash Patel as FBI director, the following prosecutions need to be multiplied 1000-fold all across the country so that even would-be election-fraud counties cower and choose not to utilize fraud machinery. Whether the guilty all get sentenced or not, dragging them through the courts such that they see jail bars in their dreams will vastly correct the guilty, but also hamper plenty of fraud from others:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9RE5GBgbOQTrump has signalled that he still wants Gaza, and Netanyahu seems to be for it because Israel has rejected an Arab scheme to re-build Gaza. Keep eyes on this because it could create the gang-up on Israel that sends the anti-Christ to Egypt.
Jerome Corsi says he's "working closely" with Trump's lawyer, Peter Ticktin, in discovering 2024 election fraud. Good sign, can't be underestimated.
A meeting this week between Trump and Russia did not materialize.
Here's a claim that Trump's government is out to seize (steal) a lot of Bitcoin:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/DqvlNZwCiGJrThe following is the Bitcoin issue above as told by Maria at Fox. Note that, if Christians save Bitcoin for tribulation purposes, the government can now seize the Bitcoin of anyone owning a property when the government seizes the property to begin with, whether seized justifiably or by government theft, or by some twisting of laws, or by the making of new-and-unreasonable laws:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cSmiDfrL-8This video below is a good one while you're cooking, lots of though-provoking Christian statements, and news-relevant too:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMoRcWdsDH0
NEXT UPDATEHere's all four Gospels wrapped into one story.
For Some Prophetic Proof for Jesus as the Predicted Son of God.
Also, you might like this related video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3EjmxJYHvM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efl7EpwmYUsPre-Tribulation Preparation for a Post-Tribulation Rapture