July 23, and then, in an article on that work, we read:
What did Obama say to the Jordinian leader yesterday? The king (Abdullah II) drove Obama to the airport personally. We know that Jordan is pro-Palestinian, and many suspect that Obama is also. How easy would it be for Obama to say just the right thing to convey to the king that as President he'll be more for Palestinians than for Israelis? Wouldn't such a thing get a ride to the airport?
"Jordanian officials said the king would raise concerns about the Palestinian cause and his country's efforts to help forge an independent Palestinian state."
That's in todays Daily Star (Lebanon). It means that the king did talk to Obama about the Palestinian issue, and of course the king wanted to test Obama to find where he stands, and leans. Certainly if Obama showed himself to be more for Israel than the Palestinians, he wouldn't have gotten the ride. McCain wouldn't have gotten the ride, you see. The king didn't reach out to Obama because he's American, or black, or Democratic. You understand. Pro-Palestinians are courting him because they think he could be likewise.
We now hear that Obama is for a two-state solution, which of course is a political statement as he visits both sides today. We need to ask who he's behind in the peace process, the Quartet, or something else. As American president, does he automatically adopt Bush's role in the Quartet, or does he have the choice to snub or modify its "Roadmap to Peace"? The following is from The Times:
"Barack Obama pledged yesterday [22nd, in Jordan] to work for peace between Israel and the Palestinians from his first day in office, hours before arriving in the [Israeli] region where he faces a sceptical audience on both sides of the conflict.
[The next President should] be concerned and recognise the legitimate difficulties that the Palestinian people are experiencing right now.'"
Oops. Bad, very bad. To Palestinians, their difficulties stem from Israel. Obama is saying, as do the pro-Palestinian Christians in his Chicago, that Israel is harsh and unreasonable toward the Palestinian cause, and that it needs to be dealt with. I wonder how Obama would want someone treated who bombed his Chicago home? Eh? Well, I think he should make an alliance with the bomber and then share half his house with him. No barbed wire between them either. That would make Obama look harsh and unreasnable to all his neighbors.
When I talked (at the end of the last update) about the betraying sort of man Obama promises to be, I had not yet seen yesterday's commentary in The Times entitled, "Is Obama a betrayal waiting to happen?" Watch it, Israel. The Democratic voters can be betrayed and they'll still love him, but if he betrays Israel, it could be because he's the False Prophet. I'm looking for signals from Obama that reveal his willingness to betray Israel. That's what I expect of the False Prophet. We have seen one large signal already. (Article here)
Just so we know, Al-Jazeera is a pro-Hezbolah media, and will therefore slant all news in that direction:
[A] party, held in Beirut, was organized by the Al-Jazeera bureau there to honor Kuntar on the occasion of his release from Israeli prison [last week in the prisoner swap]. He was hailed as a hero who carried out a brave military operation against the Jewish state.
...Earlier this year, Israel decided to boycott Al-Jazeera after accusing the station of supporting Hamas.
Kuntar is a murderer of Israelis, and promises to strike again.
Obama has met with the Israeli prime minister, Ehud Barak, and has issued several pro-Israeli statements. I'm not suggesting, yet anyway, that Obama wishes to see Israel's downfall, as do the terrorists, but that he feels sympathy toward Palestinians and therefore some animosity toward Israel's handling of those peoples. Then, and especially if it's true that he harbors a secret respect for Islam, his feelings toward Israel could devolve, over the years, as Israel resists "his" peace process. I predict Obama to be an "authoritative" (usually a nice way to say "dictatorial") sort of president, demanding compliance to his wishes.
I predict that Obama will become everything that core Democrats accused Bush of, for I believe that they accused Bush of things that were the truth about Democrats (called "projection" onto others). They believed Bush was lying at every turn because Democrats lie at every turn. They accused Bush of acting for mere political purposes because Democrats do so. They accused Bush (without evidence) of having secret personal-gain motives, and of being dictatorial, because the Democratic base is just so. Core Democrats tend to think that all people are just like themselves, and they don't realize that some people have integrity to act honorably because Democrats do not exercise these things.
I'm not suggesting that Bush acted with integrity and with honor, as I just don't know and am not in a position to judge for lack of information. I DO NOT see evidence that Bush has acted as the Democrats have accused him, but DO see clear evidence that the Democrat base is filled with scoundrels. The Democrat base has come to exude a Satanic spirit, and committed Christians have known this all generation long. Obama doesn't see it because he's not a committed Christian. I await to hear from Obama that Israel needs to turn to its Messiah who died for the nation's sins, for apart from turning to this Son of YHWH, Israel will be left to a horrible end, coming soon. But, no, Obama will not take this tack, for it would be his political demise, and he loves his political career more than he loves Jesus. Instead, Obama will try to make Israel accept a Palestinian state in the land that YHWH has reserved for a remnant of Israelites...who come to accept their true Messiah.
You see, I speak the truth even though I lose readers, but Obama speaks the lie, misleads the Israelis, and finds many friends the world over by doing so. Jesus said that if we don't "hate" our lives, we'll lose our lives, which was to say that if we stress love for our own ambitions, we'll die without resurrection. Seek first the Kingdom, Obama. Know Biblical prophecy, for by it you will know how to handle the world in a way that pleases God.
By now Obama is on his way to meet West-Bank Palestinians, to be differentiated with Gaza Palestinians: "In the afternoon, Obama will make the short drive from Jerusalem to Ramallah for talks with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas and PA Prime Minister Salaam Fayad. Abbas plans to tell Obama that if elected US president, he must immediately turn his attention to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Abbas aides said." As Obama promised only yesterday (while in Jordan) that he would focus on this very controversy as soon as he becomes President, it sounds like he was sending a very-friendly message to the Palestinians...that they could understand as Obama's favoritism toward them. (Article here)
On the drive to Ramallah, Obama will pass the concrete wall built by Israel recently to keep Palestinian terrorists at bay, a wall that his Chicago group of Christians, of the United Church of Christ, opposes. The United Church of Christ has officially used the phrase, "Israeli occupation." Moreover:
"Sen. Barack Obama's Chicago church published an open letter from a Palestinian activist that labels Israel an 'apartheid' regime and claims the Jewish state worked on an 'ethnic bomb' that kills 'blacks and Arabs.'
The letter, discovered by the blog Sweetness & Light, was published on the 'Pastor's Page' of the Trinity United Church of Christ newsletter reserved for Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr., whose anti-American, anti-Israel remarks prompted the presidential candidate to deliver a major race speech last week."
The above is a small taste of why Obama had to walk into a room full of American Jews and state that he's for an "undivided Jerusalem." One can bet that he used that phrase so that he could later make a correction: that he was referring to barbed wire dividing the city. He could have cited the concrete wall under discussion as an example, except that it would link him directly to the United Church's opposition to that wall. Another wave of criticism leveled at Obama recently was like so:
"Democratic presidential frontrunner Sen. Barack Obama served as a paid director on the board of a nonprofit organization that granted funding to a controversial Arab group that mourns the establishment of Israel as a 'catastrophe.'
The co-founder of the Arab group, Columbia University professor Rashid Khalidi, is a harsh critic of Israel who reportedly worked on behalf of the Palestine Liberation Organization when it was labeled a terror group by the State Department."
The American media made so little of this that hardly anyone knows about it. Had Bush been on the board of this organization, the story would have been emphasized for months, with Bush painted as an anti-Semite hypocrite. The only explanation I can give for the fact that Obama is getting away with this and related controversies is that he is the False Prophet that God will make the American president..for His purpose of betraying Israel to its enemies.
Palestinians have nothing to celebrate, for God is not punishing Israel for the way in which it treats Palestinians, but the way in which it sins and treats the Son of God. Not only is Israel's sin very American-like, but Israel looks to America for its security, wherefore, if I know God from reading the Bible, He will cause the United States to betray Israel. Prior to Hitler's time, the Jews had settled Germany and had become one with the nation, and they became bankers and businessmen, and ignored their Messiah and even Jerusalem, and even forgot Moses. "Never again," they say, but again they are doing the same, and will reap another Hitler.
I think I have just lost more readers...but hopefully gained the right ones. I am rejected by Israelis, by Arabs, by Democrats, by Russians, by Europe, by the Vatican, by atheists, by pre-tribulationists, by Christian liberals and Freemasons, and by Bush lovers. My mother still loves me, though, and I think that I might just get into the Kingdom of God by the skin of my seat.
What did Obama and Abbas talk about today? I dunno:
"Avoiding turning a trip to the occupied West Bank into a high-profile visit that could alienate Jewish voters, Obama did not make a statement after an hour-long meeting with President Mahmoud Abbas and Prime Minister Salam Fayyad in Ramallah."
See modern map of Israel.
CNN featured an article yesterday that said U.S. commanders asked the Pentegon for two or three brigades -- 10,000 soldiers -- for Afghanistan. Those are exactly the figures used by Obama, suggesting that he chose the numbers because his team had first been in contact with the commanders. Obama wants to make himself look military-smart, so that explains it. If you can believe it, the Obama team has said that Bush is using Obama's strategy of going into Afghanistan. Bush says he's not going into Afghanistan (with 10,000 soldiers) in his term because Obama will do it on his own terms. (Article here)
Yesterday in Israel, Obama implied that he was smarter than Bush because Bush won't talk to Iran. Then he told the Jerusalem Post that Bush wasn't smart enough to use carrots and sticks with Iran. That is, Obama claimed that his method of making Iran comply in the nuclear controversy is to use carrots on a stick!! How smart is it to tell this to the world, so that Iran hears of it??? Ahmadinejad wants to know what sort of carrot you intend to use, Mr. Obama. The reality is, he was just telling Israel what it wanted to hear. The following needs to be quoted even though it's a bit long:
"NBC's Andrea Mitchell was the one journalist with the courage to name what she was actually seeing happen: Obama faking even being interviewed by the press.
'Let me say something about the message management. He didn't have reporters with him, he didn't have a press pool, he didn't do a press conference,' either in Afghanistan or Iraq, noted Mitchell on the air. Instead Obama manufactured 'what some would call "fake interviews," because they are not interviews from a journalist,' Mitchell went on.
Mitchell understands very well that this contrived image management is powerfully all to Obama's political advantage. He's shameless when it comes to managing his own image. 'Politically it's as smart as can be,' she conceded before noting the big obvious truth nobody else in the media was bothering to expose: 'We've not seen a presidential candidate do this, in my recollection, ever before.'
On to Germany to build the image! I don't expect much but a little fanfare. Europeans are hoping that Obama will be a "listening president." Bush was overly concerned for his own agenda, and Obama might be a better European friend, they hope. But what if he just fakes it? What does Obama really want? Is there a monster living within that is a reflection of Rev. Wright? Does he aspire to lift blacks and Muslims and meanwhile to neglect or even frustrate whites? Germans is largely Aryan; Obama's skin turned out to be black, and he attended a black-power church. If the expected celebration does occur in Germany over his visit, why? What does he promise Aryans?
Is a Bush basher necessarily a good man on account of it? Obama lovers among Germans think so, but isn't this naive? In politics, when one bashes a political opponent, a self-righteous declaration is included to make contrast with the proposed evil of the opponent. That's image making, not reality. We as Biblical Christians know that the world is about to accept an Image of a deceptive "monster." Germany will likely be a part of it if I'm correct to identify the "beast" with Europe. If Hitler was any clue, Germany will be at the forefront of the beast's initiatives.
I'm trying to be helpful, not redundant. I keep reminding you that deception is at the core of the world today, so that you won't engage yourself as the world does over world events. The world is about to unite over certain principles that are dragon-inspired. We are Commanded not to have any part, and of course to expose it so that some are not deceived. I fear that some Biblical Christians are toying with the idea of supporting Obama. I would urge you to refrain until it is clearly shown that he will not be the False Prophet.
The fuss over Obama in Europe, and his treatment on this trip as though he were already the President, is a development bordering on messiah-ism. Obama still has much more time to fashion his messianic image, which is what I think he is truly attempting to do. The world has dire problems, and Obama is portraying himself as the intelligent problem-solver and therefore the savior. I had written, ten years ago, that the False Prophet would urge the world to trust in his global program to stave off a world crisis. Isn't that where Obama is going? What if he catches the spirit of Hitler while in Germany? Recall how Judas changed drastically when Satan entered him.
Obama seems to be the sort that prophecy writers have envisioned of the anti-Christ. I've maintained that this is a wrong idea, that what they foresee in the anti-Christ will be in the False Prophet instead. I caught glimpse (from Revelation 13) that the False Prophet will be a superior power to the anti-Christ, a global leader capable of swaying Europe into accepting the monstrous anti-Christ. Remember what Jesus said, that many false prophets would come seeking to deceive even the Elect (Matthew 24).
"'Hopefully (the speech) will be viewed as a substantive articulation of the relationship I'd like to see between the United States and Europe,' Obama said before landing in Berlin."
It's as if he's campaigning to be world ruler. Or, if that seems a stretch, he's setting the global table already, and exposing what he'd like to see set upon it for consumption by all the parties. But he badly needs Europeans to affirm him now (so that he can first win the election), meaning that he's not going to pass around any bad-tasting medicine. It's 1 pm EST and about 8 or 9 pm in Germany. I do believe the gig is on. Waiting for reports to come out. In other news:
"Iran on Thursday [today] signaled it will no longer cooperate with International Atomic Energy Agency experts investigating for signs of nuclear weapons programs, confirming that the probe — launched a year ago with great expectations — was at a dead end."
Iran is the biggest story to watch at this time. Developments lately are convincing me that there will be an attack on the country. I'll get into some details in the next update.
The first thing Obama said in his Germany speech is: "Tonight, I speak to you, not as a candidate for President, but as a citizen -- a proud citizen of the United States, and a fellow citizen of the world." A citizen of the world??? Who wants to be a citizen of the world? A follower of Christ, or a globalist?
Later he uses "our shared destiny." Says who? Where in the Book of God does it say that nations have a shared destiny? Oh, yes, in the part that condemns them all to everlasting fire.
Did Obama portray himself as a globalist? Indeed, and how: "But the burdens of global citizenship continue to bind us together....Partnership and cooperation among nations is not a choice; it is the one way, the only way, to protect our common security and advance our common humanity." The "only way"? Who else do we know of that used that phrase? Why is globalism the only way to common security? Why can't nations remain distinct and yet love one another? Because, they have abandoned the true God, wherefore He gives them the devil to confound and divide them. The devil is coming in the person of anti-Christ to confound them further, and the False Prophet will fail in his global mission. Jesus is the only way.
Can we be absolutely sure that Obama is pushing globalism and not just airing fancies? Yes, for he says: "the greatest danger of all is to allow new walls to divide us from one another...The walls between races and tribes; natives and immigrants; Christian and Muslim and Jew cannot stand. These now are the walls we must tear down." Obama, snap out of it. You're possessed, man. Jesus did not preach as you do. It's Freemasonry that wants all religions to unite. It's the UN who wishes all religions to unite, but I have news for you, those who know their God will not do it, they will not stand with you. They will separate themselves from you, and they will preach against you, lover and co-savior of the world!
Is Obama showing signs of joining Europe in an Atlanticist partnership? Yes, and he hasn't yet asked the American people how they feel about it, for he could care less. He says: "...America cannot turn inward. That is why Europe cannot turn inward. America has no better partner than Europe...In this century, we need a strong European Union that deepens the security and prosperity of this continent, while extending a hand abroad." "Inward" is code for "isolationism," which is itself a negative definition of simply being a distinct nation. Obama is preaching the doctrine of open borders, even though he promised his voters that he was opposed to NAFTA. Obama is an agent of globalism, not of the United States. I have yet to discover whether he is a part of a global Illuminati circle, but if so, his closest friends in the Democratic party should reveal which one in particular.
In Revelation 18, the trade of Babylon the Great (God's code for the European Union) is condemned by God, and yet Obama, speaking like a dragon, wants the most trade for the most nations in unity:
"Trade has been a cornerstone of our growth and global development. But we will not be able to sustain this growth if it favors the few, and not the many. Together, we must forge trade that truly rewards the work that creates wealth, with meaningful protections for our people and our planet. This is the moment for trade that is free and fair for all."
No, Mr, Obama, this is the moment to ease up on trade and to wait for the return of Jesus Christ, who has his own idea of globalism, with nations honoring his Father, unlike the nations of today. No, Mr. Obama, you do not have it right, for your Democratic party does not have it right.
At the very time that Jesus and his angels are coming together to destroy the world, Obama continues to say: "This is the moment when we must come together to save this planet." Can we see why His people are about to be hated in the final Week? We are going to buck against this world-salvation program, this world-trade program, this world-economy program. I have been keeping an eye open for Obama's emphasis on world commerce, for it's there that the False Prophet is to push the "mark of ther beast" (Revelation 13).
If you think I'm exaggerating, politico.com uses, "Obama Promises to Remake the World" as a headline, and then says: "Billed as a speech about Transatlantic relations, it turned out to be a manifesto for the planet, with an appeal to 'the burdens of global citizenship.'" (Article here)
Contrary to the will of God, he said: "This is the moment we must help answer the call for a new dawn in the Middle East." Whose new dawn, Mr. Obama? He didn't mention God in his speech, and yet he wishes Americans to believe that he's a follower of Christ. If the world loves you, said Jesus, you're not a child of God. If the world hates anyone for keeping to His principles, therein is a child of God.
Obama reflected Jesus as builder of His church when he said that America has yet to achieve perfection. I suppose, in a condesending way, he was apologizing to Germany for America's record of late. The promise to achieve near-perfection was between the lines. USA Today dared publish someone who wasn't star-struck, just one of many who realize that the actor is dancing with what he can't deliver: "Not all of Obama's listeners were won over. 'I wasn't impressed,' said Berliner Gabriele Seye. 'He is like all the Americans. They see America as the savior of the world.'"
As I reflected on yesterday, I realized what Obama's strategy was: to make himself appear as the invigorator of European globalism, so as to appear, to his American voters, as a phenomenal leader...i.e. even of pan-Europeanism. Yet underneath this image-making I sensed an innate globalism doctrine which Obama has personally harbored...and I think it's only starting to come out. He's not happy to be the leader only of imperfect America. Probably like his wife, he's not happy with America at all. Or, shall I say, probably like her husband, she's not happy about America at all.
David Horovitz of the Jerusalem Post thought it was important enough to add the following bit in yesterday's news:
Barack Obama...spoke to The Jerusalem Post with only a single aide in his King David Hotel room, and that aide's sole contribution to the conversation was to suggest that the candidate and I switch seats so that our photographer would get better lighting for his pictures.The journalist also commented on Obama's "formulated" message for the interview. When asked about Jerusalem, Obama did not give his personal, or the Democratic, position, but repeated that "It needs to be left up to the two parties." Apparently, Horovitz didn't push it. I would have. "What is your personal hope for a resolution on the controversy," I would have asked. "It doesn't matter what I think or believe," Obama would have responded, "it's up to the two parties." I would have countered with, "Would you bless Israel if it decides tomorrow to make the city all its own?" Obama would have been unable to say that he'd bless it, for he knows that an undivided Jerusalem belonging to Israel would torpedo the two-state solution that he and the Democrats wish to see.
...[Obama] calling out to Post photographer Ariel Jerozolimski and me that he was just going to put his tie on and then striding down the corridor to greet us."
The Times Online features an article today entitled: "He ventured forth to bring light to the world." A sub-title reads: "The anointed one's pilgrimage to the Holy Land is a miracle in action - and a blessing to all his faithful followers." It's purely a comical piece.
In spite of all these warnings that Obama is a clever fake, he still has a lead over McCain. I believe that people attribute this to his speaking abilities in sounding as though he has the right answers. Hmm, Revelation 13 emphasizes the False Prophet's speaking...deceptively.
I suppose that al-Qaeda and Hezbolah have been watching Obama, as they had been hoping him to be a boon somehow to their plans. It would be hard to have such a hope after all that he has said (on the trip) against terrorism. However, I expect that even Gog will, at first, speak against terrorism. We still don't know if Obama has a pro-Muslim side wishing to see Israel's complete downfall. Anything he says now is suspect as campaign rhetoric. Remember, his pastor at his Chicago church supports a Muslim, anti-Israeli leader, suggesting that the church has had no bones about a Christian-Muslim alliance. Then, Obama has just said (in Germany) that Christians and Muslims should tear down the walls between themselves.
The problem I face in viewing Obama as the False Prophet is his associations with Russia. At this time he is neglecting Russia. However, his Polish-born national security advisor -- and foreign affairs advisor -- Zbigniew Brzezinski, has been involved in Russian affairs. Hmm. Moreover, as Brzezinski is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, an attendee of the Bilderberg Group, and co-founded the Trilateral Commission with David Rockefeller, Obama's Illuminati ties are herein possible. As "David Rockefeller, excited about these [global] concepts, hired [Brzezinski] to create the Trilateral Commission and appointed him director," he's no small player in globalism. (Article here)
Brzezinski must have a wee bit to do with Obama's globalism, therefore, and we further note that he is "professor of American foreign policy at Johns Hopkins University's School of Advanced International Studies [and] a scholar at the Center for Strategic and International Studies...he wrote Soviet Bloc: Unity and Conflict, which focused on Eastern Europe since the beginning of the Cold War." His stance has been for the U.S. to befriend east-European Russian nations.
If that's not enough of a Russian (or anti-Russian) connection, Brzezinski's son, Mark, was Bill Clinton's director of Russian-Eurasian affairs, and Mark is now an advisor to the Obama campaign. Can anyone imagine that an office called, "Russian-Eurasian Affairs," is capable of producing a Gog partnership with Europe? I can. Mark was John Kerry's foreign policy adviser.
It turns out that Zbigniew Brzezinski has sympathies for Palestinians!! Wikipedia first tells that "He has defended the paper The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy,"
The work's thesis is that 'The Lobby', defined as a 'loose coalition of individuals and organizations who actively work to steer U.S. foreign policy in a pro-Israel direction,' promotes 'crimes perpetrated against the Palestinians'...and that U.S. Middle East policy has been driven primarily by domestic politics, especially the 'Israel Lobby'."
How's that for anti-Zionist fodder spread about the feet of the Obama campaign? I've maintained that there exists an anti-Zionist Illuminati warring against a Zionist branch, but imagine that there are other groups holding positions between these two spectrums. Hitler's Rosicrucian organization was one of the anti-Zionist groups, obviously, but do note that "new dawn" is a Rosicrucian phrase. I root Rosicrucians to a Rus peoples, but Russians were just one of many Rus groups. My findings were that the Hebrews among Rosicrucians were not Israelitish, that they (and not Israelites) were responsbile for Zionism, and that they were basic to the Freemasonic founders of the United States...explaining well Washington's pro-Zionist "lobby."
In short, there are Americans who wish to oppose the "Jewish" Lobby, and Obama with his foreign affairs team might just be a solid part of that opposition. In the wake of the Bush effort's in support for the Lobby, and the global consequences that have resulted, the majority of Americans might soon be persuaded that the Washington-Israeli alliance is the true axis of evil.
"Zbigniew Brzezinski, former national security advisor to U.S. President Jimmy Carter, wrote: 'Mearsheimer and Walt [authors of The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy] adduce a great deal of factual evidence that over the years Israel has been the beneficiary of privileged — indeed, highly preferential — financial assistance, out of all proportion to what the United States extends to any other country. The massive aid to Israel is in effect a huge entitlement that enriches the relatively prosperous Israelis at the cost of the American taxpayer."
(Same Lobby article as above)
It isn't hard to see the anti-Israeli sentiments in that statement. Again, this Zbigniew Brzezinski is Obama's national security advisor. An anti-Bush author (Eric Walberg) of an article published yesterday writes: "In Second Chance: Three Presidents and the Crisis of American Superpower, published last year, [Brzezinski] lays out his New World Order agenda without so much as a blush...Obama’s alleged global approach and trans-ethnic, trans-racial allure are right out of Zbig’s university textbook, or rather Second Chance, which will be the manual for the Obama campaign and presidency"
I'm not all that confident in the calculations of Eric Walberg (writer for Cairo's Al-Ahram Weekly), but should also mention his assertion that Obama is Brzezinski's anti-Russian pawn used to place American troops in Afghanistan purely to be in Russia's face. He then says that Brzezinski fomented "the rise of Islamic fundamentalism, which he touted as the greatest single bulwark against Soviet communism. Webster G. Tarpley argues that Brzezinski was even a prime behind-the-scenes mover in the overthrow of the Shah of Iran and installing Ayatollah Khomeini in power in Tehran." Ironically, Khomeini was a principle founder of the anti-American Muslim revolution that is to this day in America's face.
If these Muslim-supporting things about Brzezinski are even half true, can we expect him to have some speaking abilities with the terrorists to this day? Is there an anti-Zionist Illuminati circle working with the terrorists? What if Gog is being primed right now by this circle; wouldn't Obama support Gog and seek to lift him to world fame? Might Brzezinski be capable of bringing Gog to his Middle-Eastern mission? Walberg continues:
"In 2008, we have an obscure Illinois senator, a neophyte with no legislative achievements to speak of, but with a raft of utopian promises...a golden age is at hand thanks to his magnetic personality. Since he knows nothing of foreign policy, these matters will be competently managed by the Brzezinski cabal.
...Brzezinski is definitely not a hardcore Zionist, though he’s happy to allow the destruction of Palestine. Perhaps he is, under his suave exterior, still the quintessential Polish anti-Semite, with a vision of the New World Order without Israel at the centre."
I couldn't have expected a better right-hand man for both the False Prophet and the Gog-Arab alliance!!
After reading today's Herald-Tribune article on Obama, I recalled my prediction (based on what I foresee as a False Prophet alliance with Europe) that Europe is expected to lean away from a pro-Israel position. The article includes this: "[Europeans] worry that [Obama] will not alter what they see as President George W. Bush's unbending bias in favor of Israel." If I know Obama by now, he is one for change, which is more often a change is in his official position. The article itself notes Obama's newest flip-flop, where while he was "protectionist" in his position on trade while sparring with Hillary, he has suddenly become a leader on open global-trade markets.
Obama already finds himself arm-twisting Europe to get support for his Afghanistan plans. It looks like Bush all over again, critics are saying. It looks like Obama wishes to use Europe for his own agenda, and where this mentality will bring him, and his country, not even the sailer on a stormy night can know. "We love you Obama, as long as you smile nice and paint hopeful dreams, but lay off of our military."
As Zbigniew Brzezinski hailed the defeat of Russia in Afghanistan almost three decades ago, the idea of Obama parking the American military in Afghanistan, with Brzezinski as his national security advisor, promises to redden the Armageddon scenario now coming to light. Although I'm entertaining an Obama-Gog relationship, I recall writing, ten years ago, that the False Prophet would not be Gog's ally at first, but would become so only to stave off an Armageddon scenario (caused by Gog). One possibilty is that Obama emphazises Afghanistan only to see a Russian retaliate by seizing Iraq. As Gog then shows his military rat, forces in Iraq push him away toward Syrian regions. His Arab forces then (or meanwhile) take Egypt by schemes, threatening Israel all the while, and Obama then needs to make a pact with Gog to stave off further insecurities. I'm not trying to be consistent in predictions, as I'd rather share varying scenarios to watch out for, as long as they don't violate prophecy in any way.
The main point is, that with Mark Brzezinsk (the son) over-looking Eurasian-Russian affairs, there's a ready bedrock for forming the Gog-Europe-Obama alliance that I envision as the global beast overwhich Obama will order an image of "worship." Although Zbigniew Brzezinsk was avidly anti-Soviet, "He defended [post-Soviet] Russia’s integration to the Western system..." The problem lingering to this day is that Brzezinski promoted NATO's entry into various Eurasian nations, a rude intrusion in the eyes of Putin that has the Cold War heating up again. I don't think anyone will deny that some form of U.S-Russian agreement is necessary at this time in which we see the two nations rattling their sabers. (Article here)
The article above then goes on to say: "[Brzezinski's] objective is to worship Heidar Alyiev’s image and in a New York Times interview he characterized the dictator as a 'nice guy'" (underscore mine). Zowie, that came at me! Why did the writer (Arthur Lepic of the Voltaire Network) conjure up such a phrase? Heidar Aliyev, former president of Azerbaijan, is now dead, but the wording is of course knock-out relevant to the Brzezinski-Gog association suggested here. More relevant is that Azerbaijan is in Caucasia, the ancient home of Gog. Brzezinski was also chairman of the American Committee for Peace in Chechnya, which of course does nothing to curb the slap in Russia's face that he has been.
I now read: "Brzezinski assisted a system of funds and NGOs (non governmental organizations) in support of the former Soviet top-classes, intellectuals and elites." That's what I was looking for, friends within the Russian fold that Brzezinski has made, for one of them could be Gog.
In an interview with Foreign Policy, Brzezinski was aksed about the Israeli peace process. We may just find what Obama's true feelings are on the topic of JeusalemIn in Brzezinski's response:
"Progress will be made at the forthcoming conference only if the United States forthcomingly leads and starts out by defining explicitly the minimum requirements of an eventual settlement. That is: no right of return, the genuine sharing of Jerusalem, lines with reciprocal accommodations, and a demilitarized Palestinian state."
We can be more sure that Obama's true position is the "genuine sharing of Jerusalem" because the interviewer goes on to say to Brzezinski: "You and many other critics of the Bush administration’s policy toward Iran argue that the United States needs to engage Iran." Isn't that Obama's position? I think I now understand why Obama is a fake. He's a puppet.
Apparently, France brings little news, and Obama is in Britain now.
If you've come to this book beginning at this webpage, see the rest of the Gog-Iraq story in PART 2, accessed from the