How do I feel about Edward Snowden in Russia, and/or protected by Putin? First, I don't think Snowden is a friend of Communists. I'd say that he's using China and Russia because he has no other reliable choice for protection. This protection is the reason, I must assume, that he revealed the hacking of the O-nited States into Chinese computers.
Obama's team looks like a minor leaguer when chastising China for not turning Snowden in simply because the O-nited States just admitted that it hacked into Chinese computers. The O-nuts know full well that China is not going to buckle under the O-pressure, and so I must assume that the chastisement is primarily to gain world favor in this controversy that promises to paint the O's in a bad light. But that's exactly why they are such O-nuts, because the world can plainly understand China's position, like you could understand it if Obama hacked your computer. As yet, I don't know of any evidence that China hacked American computers simply because the O's have lost all credibility when accusing anyone. In my view, most everything the O-nuts say is directly opposite the truth.
The fact that the O-nuts are arguing their side of the controversy in the public arena is a telling sign of their reckless irresponsibility. They have deliberate intent to turn the mass population of the United States against the other super powers, knowing full well that the mass populations of China and Russia will turn in hatred toward the American population. The reckless nuts are planting seeds along an Armageddon pathway. A media group in Moscow: "...'the U.S. government doesn't sympathize with the ideals of freedom of information, conceals key information from the public and stands ready to open criminal proceedings against those who oppose it,' Konstantin Remchukov, the editor of independent daily Nezavisimaya Gazeta, said on Ekho Moskvy radio."
The good news concerning Snowden's acceptance in Russia is that the position of Russia on the United States, and vice-versa, is shining absolutely true now, whereas the O-dministration wanted for us to believe that it had the power to tame the bear, make it docile and even pliable. It is evident at this time especially that the O himself wants the world to believe that he is far more mighty than he really is. But last I heard, a sham = zero. And Putin knows it. Putin knew that Obama was a zero from the start. The only people he fooled were his delusional voters.
It is likely that the Chinese asked Snowden to leave abruptly when the O-nuts demanded for China to release him. The O-nuts were publicly portraying China as harboring a criminal, which only goes to show how little class or nobility they use. Russia may have been chosen by Snowden because it can safely transfer him by air or sea, on a military craft, to a country that it has alliance with. But we may be surprised to find that Snowden will stay in Russia for quite some time, if he's there at all.
It should be said that the Guardian could find no evidence that Snowden was in Russia, but AP insists that he was/is. Perhaps the only evidence that he entered Russia was the claim of WikiLeaks' Julian Assange, who claimed that Snowden passed through Russia en route to elsewhere. Judging by those words alone, Assange hadn't said that Snowden flew to Moscow, or that he got off a plane in Russia anywhere. ITAR-Tass news agency said that Snowden passed through Sheremetyevo airport about 20 miles from Moscow. Then, on June 25:
Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Tuesday former U.S. spy agency contractor Edward Snowden was still in the transit area of Moscow's Sheremetyevo airport, was free to leave and should do so as soon as possible.http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/25/us-usa-security-putin-idUSBRE95O0VE20130625
None of this is necessarily true because we could expect Assange and Putin to lie to fool the Americans. But even if Snowden is in the airport, and if he takes off from it, the Americans won't know which plane to track as many take off day after day. Or, even if they knew which plane to track, there's not much they can do to get him until he lands. Where will he land? Is there a direct flight from Moscow to Ecuador (South America) or Cuba? If not, and if Putin wants him to get away, how will they get Snowden to Ecuador, the country now sheltering Julian Assange? I don't know of a western European country that would allow Snowden to land for a re-fueling. However, correct me if I'm wrong, if he wanted to fly to Ecuador, he could have taken a flight from China over the Pacific. By his presence in Moscow, one might assume a flight over the Atlantic, to Cuba, has been planned; a west-African airport could be helpful there.
Note how AP uses the word "publicly" to point out an obvious O-blunder:
While the U.S. does not have an extradition treaty with Russia, the White House publicly prodded the Kremlin to send Snowden back to the U.S....
...Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov on [June 25] bluntly rejected the U.S. request [to extradite], saying Snowden hasn't crossed the Russian border. He angrily lashed out at the U.S. for [public] warnings of negative consequences if Moscow fails to comply."
"We consider the attempts to accuse Russia of violation of U.S. laws and even some sort of conspiracy, which on top of all that are accompanied by threats, as absolutely ungrounded and unacceptable," Lavrov said.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_OBAMA_SNOWDEN_DIPLOMACY?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2013-06-25-06-16-54
The Russian minister is painting Obama as a hasty false-accuser, and indeed, the O's are shifting the focus from their own unsightly embarrassment to the Russian villain. In the same way, they are painting China PUBLICLY with a similar brush. "The White House made clear it believes the final decision to let Snowden leave for Russia was made by Chinese officials in Beijing." The O's want you to think that this is a Communist versus U.S.-angel controversy. I say that Obama is the biggest devil of all.
The NSA chief, Keith Alexander, claimed that the O-nited States hacked Chinese computers because China first hacked American computers. Well, then, Mr. Alexander, let the war of words begin in the public domain. Reveal to us all: which computers did China hack? State your evidence, and then let China defend itself against your accusations. We will all read up on the back-and-forth, and make up our own minds as to which of the two are the bigger culprits. Mr. Alexander, two rights don't make a right, anyway. You are guilty of computer hacking on top of collecting the private information of your own people. Mr. Alexander, you are a dirty troll living in a mud hole trying to disguise yourself as a shining angel. The world doubts very much that China is the only country you've hacked. The world would like to know from Snowden what exactly you are doing, and why.
"'My position with Booz Allen Hamilton granted me access to lists of machines ALL OVER THE WORLD the NSA hacked,' Snowden told the South China Morning Post in a June 12 interview published Monday. 'That is why I accepted that position about three months ago.'" He says he has the proof of such hacking in other countries. We await to see it.
http://www.newsmax.com/newswidget/Snowden-secrets-job-leak/2013/06/25/id/511720?promo_code=F470-1&utm_source=Fox_Politics&utm_medium=nmwidget&utm_campaign=widgetphase2
Does anyone one of us really believe that China started the hacking? The Internet is an off-shoot invention of the American military...which knew the spy potential from the start, and waited patiently for the Internet to be popularized. It made the people, especially the young, the suckers of its spy machine. A spy is never a friend. Whomever the NSA spies on, that's who the NSA turns into an enemy. The NSA has spied everywhere, and made enemies of the entire world as a result. That's what this issue is all about, and why the O-fascists are trying to deflect focus onto the Communists / "violators of human rights."
[The day after writing the above, the following article came out:
The clandestine National Security Agency is partly responsible for the modern PC era, a newly declassified document reveals, thanks to decades of custom computers built for one thing: espionage.
Declassified by the NSA on May 29 and posted online on [June 24], the 344-page report “It Wasn’t All Magic: The Early Struggle to Automate Cryptanalysis, 1930s – 1960s,” details the unknown high-tech history of computers so secretive even their code names were kept confidential.
Until now.
It’s a never-before seen history of code-breaking, spying and its role in the birth of the computer.
http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2013/06/26/declassified-govt-report-details-decades-nsa-computer-spying/
Hmm, look and see how the article mentions a Bush surname: "The document walks through pioneering work by MIT scientist Vannevar Bush to automate cryptanalysis as early as 1936, thanks to “optical scanning, high-speed data tapes, electronic computing, and microfilm in a series of increasingly complex cryptanalytic machines.”" You might be interested in the Bush surname as it applied in the last chapter's section, "The Bush-Whacko Nahorites." It was on a Bush connection to Booz Allen Hamilton.]
The fear in America is that China and Russia will unite military forces should the alliance ever be needed to attack the United States. However, judging from the little outcry from the U.S. military when Obama speaks on cutting military spending or argues for nuclear-weapons reductions, it can be surmised that there is no such threat. The U.S. purpose in spying on China must have to do with other things. The U.S. purpose in spying on the Russians is of obvious relevance in the Syria conflict. I would suggest that Obama wants dearly to know how well China and Russia are getting along because, possibly, China could support Putin in the Syria conflict should Obama enter the war. The O-nuts are destroyers in fine suits, wherefore one could expect them to escalate the Russia-China problem to a high-threat level.
Ah, just out this week, just as was expected:
JERUSALEM -- President Bashar al-Assad inked a secret deal that gives Russia the license to control natural gas resources in Syria, according to informed Middle Eastern security officials.
The officials said Assad last month agreed to sign the document, considered an understanding of principals on control of his country's gas resources, including transiting pipelines, in exchange for continued Russian support in resisting the insurgency against his regime.
The officials further said Russia helped to broker a separate understanding with Assad that would allow public and private Chinese companies to rebuild damaged infrastructure in Syria if Assad defeats the insurgency.
...Syria is a key energy transit route to Europe. A number of countries appear to be seeking dominance of the energy market that runs through Syria.
In 2011, Syria announced it had discovered a promising gas field in the city of Homs, which would later see some of the fiercest battles between Assad's forces and the rebels.
...Syria is site of the proposed construction of a massive underground gas pipeline that, if completed, could drastically undercut the strategic energy power of U.S. ally Qatar and also would cut Turkey out of the pipeline flow [this can explain why Turkey opposes Assad].
Dubbed the Islamic pipeline, it may ultimately favor Russia and Iran against Western energy interests [ah, this explains why the West wants to control Syria].
Set to open in 2016, Iran, Iraq and Syria signed a deal in 2010 to construct the 3,480-mile natural gas pipeline connecting Iran’s South Pars field to European customers.
...The Islamic pipeline originally may have undermined Russian's sale of natural gas to Europe, but the new secret deal purportedly signed with Assad may serve to secure Russian interests.
The Islamic pipeline is viewed as a major threat to Turkey, which has long desired to become the main bridge for natural gas and oil between the East and the West. The proposed Islamic pipeline completely cuts out Turkey [yikes].
Turkey, however, is a key player in the Nabucco natural gas pipeline [owned by the West; despised by Russia]...
http://www.wnd.com/2013/06/exposed-syrias-backroom-deal-with-russia/?cat_orig=world
It's amazing how western media has neglected to tell/stress the story in the article above as the real reason behind the Syria conflict. The "blood" of Noah's Flood -- oil -- is about to curse a wicked, violent mankind to a doom worse than the Flood. Go for the oil, dogs, and then burn in its flames. That's the Lake of Fire to which God has relegated the forces of the anti-Christ, and the nations of the world who attack Israel.
Britain is not the peanut dancing the tune of the O-nuts. It's the other way around. Here's an article carried by prisonplanet dated in mid-2012:
Major changes to surveillance laws are to give the [British] Government the power to monitor email exchanges and website visits of every person in the UK.
...Internet companies will be instructed to install hardware enabling GCHQ -- the Government's electronic "listening" agency -- to examine "on demand" any phone call made, text message and email sent, and website accessed in "real time".
Civil liberties campaigners expressed fears that this ‘unprecedented’ move will intrude on the lives of British citizens, with the measures being compared to strict controls currently exercised in China and Iran.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/government-to-roll-out-same-snooping-tactics-as-china-and-iran-by-getting-access-to-everybodys-emails-texts-and-internet-browsing.html
No one's calling Prison Planet nuts anymore for sharing that claim back then. Instead, the world is starting to see who the real nut-bars are, our own leaders disguised as our protectors. Here is the hypOcrite:
In a very informative piece back in September, London Guardian journalist Glenn Greenwald, the man who broke the Snowden revelations, noted:
“In 2008, candidate Obama hailed whistleblowing as “acts of courage and patriotism,” which “should be encouraged rather than stifled as they have been during the Bush administration.”
“President Obama, however, has waged the most aggressive and vindictive assault on whistleblowers of any president in American history,” Greenwald clarifies.
In addition, as journalist Peter Van Buren has pointed out,
“Obama’s zeal in silencing leaks that don’t make him look like a superhero extends beyond the deployment of the Espionage Act into a complex legal tangle of retaliatory practices, life-destroying threats, on-the-job harassment, and firings. Lots of firings.”
http://www.infowars.com/pardon-edward-snowden-petition-reaches-threshold-for-white-house-response/
A president who snaps a mean whip, then smiles before the nation like a nice guy. Your typical rapist in action. "'We're following all the appropriate legal channels and working with various other countries to make sure that the rule of law is observed,' Mr Obama told reporters when asked if he was confident that Russia would expel Mr Snowden." First, Mr. Obama, respect the law yourself, turn yourself in to the police, and go to jail as you deserve; then you can speak on Snowden's issues. Mr. Obama has blamed all of his scandals on others, a typical criminal in denial. First, arrest some of your own people at IRS and the Justice Department, and then you will be taken seriously on arresting some of your enemies. As we speak, his vain wife is probably at an expensive dress shop hoping that her husband will not be impeached; otherwise, her beautification era will come to an end. These are socialites who care nothing for how much money they spend of yours for frolicking about.
Online joke: "IRS Has Ruled Obama Can Write Off First Half of His Second Term as a Total Loss'..."
Having said all that, I keep a theory in the back of my mind that Snowden and Obama are in cahoots, working out a global plot to destroy the Unites States, starting with an atomic weapon exploded inside the country, which can be blamed on China, Russia, North Korea, or even the Arabs. In this way, the O-nuts can install an emergency-government process...and change the nation as they please with little hope of recovery to the norm. To this theory I will add the following from a writer seemingly up-to-speed whisteblower land:
Some of Snowden's emphases seem to serve an intelligence/police state objective, rather than to challenge them.
a) He is super-organized, for a whistleblower...He insisted on publishing a power point in the newspapers that ran his initial revelations. I gather that he arranged for a talented filmmaker to shoot the Greenwald interview. These two steps – which are evidence of great media training...are virtually never done (to my great distress) by other whistleblowers...They are always done, though, by high-level political surrogates.
b) ...He is not struggling for words, or thinking hard, as even bright, articulate whistleblowers under stress will do. Rather he appears to be transmitting whole paragraphs smoothly, without stumbling...
c) He keeps saying things like, "If you are a journalist and they think you are the transmission point of this info, they will certainly kill you." Or: "I fully expect to be prosecuted under the Espionage Act." He also keeps stressing what he will lose: his $200,000 salary, his girlfriend, his house in Hawaii. These are the kinds of messages that the police state would LIKE journalists to take away...
d) It is actually in the Police State's interest to let everyone know that everything you write or say everywhere is being surveilled, and that awful things happen to people who challenge this...
...h) I was at dinner last night to celebrate the brave and heroic Michael Ratner of the Center for Constitutional Rights. Several of Assange's also brave and talented legal team were there, and I remembered them from when I had met with Assange. These attorneys are present at every moment when Assange meets the press -- when I met with him off the record last Fall in the Ecuadoran embassy, his counsel was present the whole time, listening and stepping in when necessary.
...WHERE IS SNOWDEN'S LAWYER as the world's media meet with him? A whistleblower talking to media has his/her counsel advising him/her at all times, if not actually being present at the interview, because anything he/she says can affect the legal danger the whistleblower may be in...[excellent point]
Again I hate to cast any skepticism on what seems to be a great story of a brave spy coming in from the cold in the service of American freedom. And I would never raise such questions in public if I had not been told by a very senior official in the intelligence world that indeed, there are some news stories that they create and drive – even in America (where propagandizing Americans is now legal). But do consider that in Eastern Germany, for instance, it was the fear of a machine of surveillance that people believed watched them at all times – rather than the machine itself – that drove compliance and passivity. From the standpoint of the police state and its interests –why have a giant Big Brother apparatus spying on us at all times – unless we know about it?
http://www.prisonplanet.com/my-creeping-concern-that-the-nsa-leaker-edward-snowden-is-not-who-he-purports-to-be.html
If Snowden is in cahoots with Obama on such a fake job, then we should expect Snowden to be "captured" soon. On the other hand, how does he continue to be a fake job unless he goes through the court process? How can they fake that unless they have a legion of insiders willing to fake the court case? Perhaps they will have him die, alleviating the need for the court case.
The writer above seems to have a narrow view (no insult intended) on why Snowden might be a fake job. For me, I would see a fake job as touching China and Russia rather than merely having the purpose of striking fear into American would-be whistleblowers. One of the questions I had was: why did Snowden reveal his location in Hong Kong? What would China have to do with a fake job of this nature? That's why I pointed out earlier that Obama may have decided to fake a nuclear explosion in America (needs a nuclear enemy and a motive from the enemy) in order to retain his job indefinitely. This Snowden story is coming just as Obama is being threatened with a total collapse of his government, you see. And Obama has been quick to make enemies of both Russia and China. If a nuclear explosion took place next month, he could blame it on either nation but claim ignorance of which one. Just a thought; please don't freak out...unless it happens.
In this picture, neither China nor Russia would need to know of the plot. Snowden was sent to both nations with the predictable result of neither extraditing him. Thus, a conflict could be set up that may be aggravated further in Syria in a neo-cold-war scenario. I can't, off the top of my head, point to any matter that could completely discredit a fake job in the Snowden case.
Another purpose of such a faked event would be to discover WikiLeaks operators, operations, etc., if Julian Assange falls for this.
There is a Snowden Coat using the Massin/Mason motto, and a version of the More Coat, important because both Morays and Massins/Masons use the Melusine mermaid. Not only had Obama's Dunham bloodline merged with Randolphs out of Moray, but his Dunham line was at first the Singletary surname using the antelope, symbol of the Snow surname (fesse colors reversed to Snowden fesse). Moreover, Snows were first found in Rutland, a part of Leicestershire, the latter being where Irish More's were first found. I trace Rutlands to the Ruths/Randolphs/Rothers (may be using one Singletary chevron), first found in Moray. I trace Rutlands to Rockefellers of the Rodham / Rutherford kind (see these terms in the last update for further reading).
If the O-squirrels were hoping to shift focus from Benghazi:
The House Republican chairman [Darrell Issa] investigating last year's terror attack on a U.S. diplomatic post in Benghazi, Libya, has subpoenaed four State Department officials, saying the department was stalling on efforts to interview them.http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jun/25/rep-darrell-issa-issues-benghazi-subpoenas-state-d/
Oh goodie. I hope there's more trouble for the O-nuts and H-nuts together. Hillary really thinks she's a shoe-in for 2016, but to make her position more attractive, she's required to offer, at any moment, a few words in opposition to Obama's scandals. She can't hide forever. Where is she now? Come on out, madam. Tell us how you feel about these scandals. If you want to be president, you're going to have to. Also, Americans would like to know how she will handle the Russia / Syria crisis. Make no mistake about it; it is a crisis:
Russia has expressed alarm over the deployment of US troops and military equipment in Jordan, in an indication of the widening diplomatic fallout from the internationalisation of Syria's civil war.
...Abdullah Ensour, prime minister of Jordan, on [June 22] said that the country was hosting 900 US military personnel, the first such public acknowledgment by a Jordanian official.
He told reporters in Amman that 200 were personnel training for how to handle a possible chemical attack from Syria [not likely the crux of their purpose]. Another 700 [here's the real scoop] are manning a Patriot missile defence system, F-16 fighter jets, and other defence systems that the US left behind in Jordan after a military exercise that ended on June 20.
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/ae43e8ee-dcbb-11e2-9700-00144feab7de.html
Um, oh, I get it. Plant anti-aircraft military beside Syria using the excuse of a military drill in Jordan so that Putin (and the world) is fooled to the point of not fussing about it. What a stupid man that Obama is. We are waiting for his decision on whether to decree a no-fly zone in Syria, his declaration of war essentially. Remember too that Israel has openly promised to destroy any S-300 missile systems delivered to Assad from Russia. Is this a part of prophecy fulfillment? We shall be on the edge of our seats, watching.
Here is Obama acting more like a political activist than an honorable president:
"I am deeply disappointed with the Supreme Court's decision today...
"As a nation, we've made a great deal of progress towards guaranteeing every American the right to vote. But, as the Supreme Court recognized, voting discrimination still exists. And while today's decision is a setback, it doesn't represent the end of our efforts to end voting discrimination. I am calling on Congress to pass legislation to ensure every American has equal access to the polls. My Administration will continue to do everything in its power to ensure a fair and equal voting process."
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obama-supreme-court-decision-setback_737849.html
This is the same hypocrite now trying to push immigration reform so that illegal Mexicans can have rights in America to vote, thus undermining the votes of the Americans he pretends to care for. Obama is acting the poor loser in this case, but it's Hillary who will feel it at election time, especially if the immigration-reform bill doesn't pass. The supreme-court ruling above struck down the right for the O-federal government to dictate to the states the methods to be used in setting up their election process (it's dangerous to allow dictators to control election process). Obama just lost control of all that, in other words, and he's acting the big cry baby, wasting no time to make a public statement to blacken the five supreme-court judges who snubbed him. Good going guys. Do it again soon.
The goal of immigration reform is not beyond our ability to predict: it's to make Texas a Democrat state using the Mexican vote. It would be virtually impossible for Republicans to hold the White House in foreseeable decades without winning Texas. Therefore, Democrat voters are going to welcome illegals as legals at any asap moment, regardless of the dangers that they might pose as neighbors or transients. Liberals give no thought to the well-being of community when the priority is their INDIVIDUAL rights. What percentage of illegal aliens from Mexico are criminal types? Who cares, so long as liberals have the White House to assure that godly society doesn't happen. Let hedonism rule. The irony is that Mexicans are voting lock-step with the liberals whose values they despise. Yes, it makes hypocrites of Mexicans.
Obama's scandals haven't quite seemed to find their end; we now hear of a hyper-spy program between fellow workers:
Amid the furor in Washington over government leaks and media exposés, a little-known executive order signed by President Obama in October of 2011 could fuel the paranoia.
It requires government agencies to "implement an insider threat detection and prevention program" -- in effect, ordering all government employees, regardless of security clearances or the sensitivity of their work, to police fellow workers as potential security threats, and report the suspicious behavior to superiors [fascists use this tactic].
...The edict applies to all government agencies, even those with no involvement in national security matters such as the Peace Corps and the Department of Education.
...It points to "stress, divorce, untreated mental illness, financial problems, frustrations with co-workers or the organization" as warning signs [of potential criminal activity] that must be reported.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/06/24/program-urging-federal-workers-to-tattle-on-each-other-raises-concerns/?test=latestnews
It's not enough that the Democrat machine turns blacks against white, Latinos against Americans, women against men, employees against bosses, disgusting queers and tramps against good Christians; now the machine wants to turn worker against worker. Worker is now to spy on fellow worker, and soon, neighbor is to spy on neighbor, on behalf of the government. What a wonderful world.
This time, the turn-coat judge on the supreme court voted against Obama. In the vote on Obamacare, judge Roberts was expected to vote against Obamacare so that the decision would have been 5-4 against it, and yet he suddenly betrayed the expectation and voted for Obamacare so that the vote ended up 5-4 in favor of it. But with the bad press everywhere on the initial implementation of Obamacare, Roberts has been deemed a fool. That's why he's now back to voting against Obama. World Net Daily thinks that Roberts turned fool due to pressure from Obama, but what kind of pressure was it? WND is hesitant to say it, but I won't be:
...On June 28, 2012, Roberts joined the left of the Court in a dramatic 5-4 decision to uphold President Obama's signature legislation. ...
...CBS News reported, “It is not known why Roberts changed his view on the mandate and decided to uphold the law. At least one conservative justice tried to get him to explain it, but was unsatisfied with the response, according to a source with knowledge of the conversation.”
The conservative justices then drafted a highly unusual, unsigned joint dissent. According to the report, “They deliberately ignored Roberts’ decision, the sources said, as if they were no longer even willing to engage with him in debate.” Several months later, Justice Scalia admitted, “I was disappointed it came out the way it did.”
Speculation at the time suggested public pressure from President Obama and other supporters of the law succeeded in convincing Roberts to find a way to uphold Obamacare.
...“This change in his vote likely occurred about the same time when I saw a big uptick in the public criticism against Chief Justice Roberts. It was sort of preemptive criticism from Democrats in the Senate and from the White House counseling him, pleading with him, warning him, insisting that it would be a form of judicial activism if he invalidated a law that was ‘duly enacted by an elected Congress,’” Lee said. “So yeah, it does appear to have had that effect.”
http://www.wnd.com/2013/06/senator-obama-pressured-roberts-to-ok-obamacare/
It sounds to me that the uptick was a threat of more to come if Roberts didn't vote the Obama way. That is, the O-spies had some dirt on him from his phone calls / email, and the Democrats stuck it in his face, blackmailing him. I can't think of a better explanation. That's the sort of corrupt power that a president can wield when the NSA keeps records of private conversations and Internet activity. That's why the spy machine needs to be abolished. That's why Obama doesn't want to abolish it. The question is, will Roberts vote liberal in future cases?
The secret court (FISA) allowing the NSA to have free access to our emails has had enough; it's now poo-poohing on those like me who say that it was in cahoots with NSA. I say the FISA court should take it's poop and eat it. I say we should have their names, their addresses, and copies of everything they've ever said in private, but especially how they have made decisions in relation to this controversy. They knew all along that all the hammer would come down on their heads if this secret program got loose. Who are these judges, we should like to know? What do they stand for? Who chose them?
Recent leaks of classified documents have pointed to the role of a special court in enabling the government's secret surveillance programs, but members of the court are chafing at the suggestion that they were collaborating with the executive branch.
...U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, the former chief judge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, took the highly unusual step Friday of voicing open frustration at the account in the report and court’s inability to explain its decisions.
“In my view, that draft report contains major omissions, and some inaccuracies, regarding the actions I took as Presiding Judge of the FISC [FISC?] and my interactions with Executive Branch officials,” Kollar-Kotelly said in a statement to The Post. It was her first public comment describing her work on the intelligence court.
The inspector general's draft report is among the many documents leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, touching off a roiling national debate...
The document portrays the surveillance court as “amenable” to the government’s legal theory to “re-create” authority for the Internet metadata program that had initially been authorized by President George W. Bush without court or congressional approval. The program was shut down in March 2004 when acting Attorney General James B. Comey and senior leaders at the Justice Department threatened to resign over what they felt was an illegal program.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/secret-court-judges-upset-at-portrayal-of-collaboration-with-government/2013/06/29/ed73fb68-e01b-11e2-b94a-452948b95ca8_print.html
Obama just replaced Robert Mueller as chief of the FBI with James Comey, a Republican. It's also interesting that, in a recent update, I showed again why I think the Walker bloodline to the president Bush's were from the Komnenos > Comyn line...i.e. that may have included the Comeys. In Comey's Wikipedia article: "After law school, Comey served as a law clerk for then-United States District Judge John M. WALKER, Jr. in Manhattan. Then, he was an associate for Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher in their New York Office...Comey withdrew his threat to resign after meeting directly with President Bush, who gave his support to making changes in the surveillance program." Hmm.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Comey
Scottish Comeys/Come's/Combs use the same lion (in the same colors) as Dutch Bush's, as well as a red-on-white heart, a symbol of the Kollars. The Glass suspect Douglas' also use this heart, which is just one good reason for lumping Kollars in with the Kyles / Cole's at the Ayrshire / Renfrew theater. The Comeys/Come's are said to be a branch of MacIntoshes, themselves part of Clan Cattan, a term much like "Cutter" and "Kotelly" (important because Cutters trace to the Busca theater).
The article continues:
The perception that the court works too closely with the government arises in large part from the tribunal's “ex parte” nature, which means that unlike in a traditional court, there is no legal sparring between adversaries with the judge as arbiter. Instead, a Justice Department official makes the case for the government agency seeking permission to carry out surveillance inside the United States. No one speaks for the target of the surveillance or the company that is ordered to allow its networks to be tapped or to turn over its customers’ data.
Besides, the fact alone that the FISA court orders Google and other Internet companies not to disclose to the people that their email data is being recorded by NSA is an exercise in deliberate deception because the people were led to believe that this was not rendered possible. That alone assures that FISA is in cahoots with NSA. Yes, FISA court must protect itself against the secret getting out, meaning that FISA is restricted in how much snooping ability it caters to NSA, but the fact is, FISA and NSA are in cahoots to throw this ball as far as they can get away with. That's the bottom line.
It goes on: "Some critics say the court is a rubber stamp for government investigators because it almost never has turned down a warrant application. However, that high batting average doesn't take into account changes the court requires in some requests and other applications that the government withdraws." Yes, but then the changes are likely due to the self-interest of the judges -- protecting themselves in case the secret gets out -- not on behalf of the people being spied on. "For about 30 years, the court was located on the sixth floor of the Justice Department's headquarters, down the hall from the officials who would argue in front of it..."There is a collaborative process that would be unnatural in the public, criminal court setting," said a former Justice official familiar with the court." Spit!
The Illuminati has included the Kyle's (black candles, coiled snake), and as was said above, the Kollars are a Kyle-suspect family. The Illuminati routinely includes the Ayers / Hayers and therefore the Hay bloodline, and so see this from the article above: "In May 2004, the NSA briefed Kollar-Kotelly on the technical aspects of that program's collection, according to the report. She also met with the NSA director, Lt. Gen. Michael V. HAYden, on two successive Saturdays during the summer of 2004 to discuss the issue, the report said." Haydens are the ones sharing the black bull with the Cole's. The Haydens were suspect as a Hiedler/Hitler bloodline when I discovered that Aryan Nations had their headquarters at Hayden Lake in Idaho. Also, the KELLy surname shares the "enfield" griffin with Hiedlers/Hitlers.
Moreover, the Kottel/Kutzel surname (in Kyle-candle colors) uses a so-called "COLumn," the symbol also of the German Schores, important because it was Otto SKORzeny (a WW2 Nazi) who revealed that George Herbert Walker Bush was born George Herbert SCHERf, son of a Nazi, and was therefore a Nazi spy in America. The Cuts/Cuttes' (i.e. suspect with "KUTZel") are said to be a branch of "Cuthbert," and then the Cuthbert/Cudbert snake design is used by Irish Comeys. Cuts/Cuttes' share a white talbot dog with Haydens, and the black-on-white "pellet" roundels on the Hayden dog are probably colors reversed from the white "plate" roundels of the Cuts/Cuttes'. Pellets are clearly the Pilote and Pillette/Pillots bloodline who use the grail cups of the Shaws honored in the Ayrshire motto.
"On July 14, 2004 [i.e. under Kollar-Kotelly], the surveillance court for the first time approved the gathering of information by the NSA, which created the equivalent of a digital vault to hold Internet metadata. Kollar-Kotelly's order authorized the metadata program under a FISA provision known as the "pen register/trap and trace," or PRTT."
...The ruling was a secret not just to the public and most of Congress, but to all of Kollar-Kotelly's surveillance court colleagues. Under orders from the president, none of the court's other 10 members could be told about the Internet metadata program, which was one prong of a larger and highly classified data-gathering effort known as the President's Surveillance Program, or PSP.
Ahh, a very good revelation, not known by me before. Only Kollar-Kotelly knew. She gave the permissions. She collaborated. The other FISA judges were deceived when necessary, and carried along like tools in a tool bag to pry open the public treasure chest of information to a degree not opened before. The following doesn't necessarily make Kollar-Kotelly an angel, but does definitely highlight what we can already guess rightly beforehand, that NSA was hot-to-trot in gathering your private data: "Kollar-Kotelly could be a stern taskmaster when she thought the NSA was overstepping its bounds. In 2004, she temporarily shut down the government's surveillance program when she learned of a key NSA failure, The Post reported in 2006. The agency was not properly walling off information gained in warrantless surveillance and may have been using the information to obtain court warrants, which was forbidden. In 2005, the problem resurfaced and she issued a strong warning to the government that it had to fix the problem or would face trouble obtaining court warrants." One could pin that over-stepping on the George-Bush team.
Irish Comeys are in Pollock colors, and use an oak tree that should lead to the Panico's/Panetta's of the Reno > Renfrew circle of families. Emailer Pollock said that her immediate family includes the COMforts (white talbot dog), who shows as "COMERford," a branch of CAMELfords/Comerfords/Cumbers (important because Cole's trace to king Cole of CAMULOdunum). This jibes with the trace (in the last update) of Pollocks and their Alan kin to Nahorites of the Camel kind. The point here is not to demonize emailer Pollock's family whatsoever, but to show the likeliness of a trace of her Pollock side to the Polzl surname that was mother to Adolf Hitler (Hitler's father married both a Polzl and a Glassl surname) for the purpose of suggesting that Kollar-Kotelly may be a Nazi tool / operative of the George-Bush kind. Not only do Comforts share the white hunting horn with Pollocks, but the Comforts use three gold-on-blue stars used also by Hiedlers/Hitlers.
I realized at one point that two lions facing one another, as used by Comeys and Kellys, for example, was a symbol of boxers, and therefore of mythical Pollux (smacks of "Pollock"), for he was given a boxer symbol anciently.
The Kollar heart is pierced with an arrow(s), as is the Pollock boar. As the Burns (CUMBERland) are said to be from Renfrew, where Pollocks were first found, the Kollar write-up is suspect as code for the Burn bloodline: "The ancient and distinguished surname Kollar is of German origin. The name is derived from the Alemmanic word 'Kohler,' meaning 'charCOAL BURNER,'..." It just so happens that Burners, in Pollock colors, were first found in Surrey, while I trace the Surrich variation of Surreys to "Zurich," the area where I see the origins of the Hiedler/Hitler surname.
I've long suggested that the Burns (share hunting horns with Bars) are a branch of Bars/Berrs (Burner colors) from a Bar location near Kotor, origin of Cutters and close kin to the Busca > Bush line. Scottish Bars were first found in Ayrshire and Renfrewshire. Lines out of Kotor (fish symbol) is where terms such as "FISC" may apply, of obvious importance where Kollar-Kotelly was made the ruler of the FISC court. And let's not forget the codewords, "FISCAL cliff," which is in-part code for the Fisk-related Cliff surname (see also Sellicks).
Kollars with Kyles and Cole's / Coles' trace easily to Servitium off the COLapis river, and on the Sava/Save river, important for where the Cuthbert and Comey snake design is used by Save's. The Pollock saltire cross now traces to the same-colored cross in the Arms of Pula, a location not far from Servitium. It was discovered (by me) not many months ago that Pula was part of the COLchian domains as per the Argonautica myth wherein black-magic Colchians followed mythical Jason to that area of Europe. It's apparent here that Colchians named Colchester, the later name of Camulodunum.
In Wikipedia's article on Kollar-Kotelly: "From 1968-69, Kollar-Kotelly served as a law clerk to the Hon. Catherine B. KELLY, District of Columbia Court of Appeals..." It goes on: "On October 3, 1984, Kollar-Kotelly was nominated as an associate judge of the D.C. Superior Court by President Ronald Reagan;..." Reagan is the one who chose George Herbert Scherf to be his vice-president.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colleen_Kollar-Kotelly
We find in her article that she was raised to the surveillance court by the Supreme-Court chief justice, William REHNquist (a Swede on his father's side), whose mother was a Peck...tracing to the Pek river that drains at the ISTER river (now the Danube). That seems important where Pula is in ISTRia. The dove symbol of mythical Ishtar was at Cuppae, the so-called "City of Doves" off the Pek river. I traced Cuppae to "Copparo" off the Reno because the Pek bloodline was deemed by me to be the Payen/Pagan bloodline to the Panico's/Panetta's on the Reno river. Note how "REHN" / "RAGEN" may trace to Reno elements (part of the Pink/Pinch bloodline).
The Peks/Pecks can be traced to the Istria / Rijeka theater in merger with the Pollock-related Maxwells because Peks/Pecks were first found in the same place (Essex) as Gore's that trace to Gorski beside Rijeka. I have clinched the trace of Gores to the same place as the Cole's / Kyle's / etc., that place being the Colapis river, home anciently of the Japodes, the proto-Romans that were eventually found to be from "Jabesh," the place on the east side of the Jordan river where the 600 Benjamites got their 400 wives. I insisted that the 600 Benjamites were code for the same thing (i.e. Meshwesh that evolved into the Maezaei off the Colapis) as the 600 Danites, but here I now find that the Taney surname (Essex!) uses the two-headed eagle, a Maxwell symbol out of Rijeka. I came across the Taney surname (SIX eagles) just now from the Rehnquist article: "Rehnquist served as Chief Justice for nearly 19 years, making him the fourth-longest-serving Chief Justice after John Marshall, Roger Taney, and Melville Fuller..." Taneys are in Tunbridge colors, and the latter are from ROCHester elements suspect with the rock symbol of Rijeka and of the related Rockefellers.
Fullers / Fellers are themselves a branch of Pollocks, in my strong opinion, tracing to FULbert "the tanner." The latter was from Falaise, and so see the Burner write-up: " They are believed to be descended from Hugh de Berniers in Normandy near Falaise." Burners, in case you've forgotten, are in code in the Kollar write-up.
For new readers, the Peks/Pecks / Payens/Pagans trace back to "Apachnas," the Hyksos pharaoh that I say had a Mus / Meshwesh household that became merged with the Benjamites at Rimmon. I have typically traced these particular Hyksos from Tanis through pre-Israel, to the Ixion Centaurs (ancient code for a certain horse-loving people group) to the Cantii namers of Kent, where Tunbridge is located, and where the Massins/Masons were first found who trace to Ferte-Mace, near Falaise. In fact, these Hyksos can be traced to mythical HECate, the witch goddess worshiped by the mythical witch, Medea, a Colchian princess whom was brought by Jason to the Pula theater. One of the first traces I ever made of the Hyksos was to the founding of the Romans through the HECabe > HECtor Trojans; this trace was several years before realizing that the 600 Benjamites and 600 Danites (or "Daniy") co-founded the Japodes. I traced the Jabesh > Japode line to the proto-Danaan in Joppa, now Jaffa, and so read this from the Rehnquist article: "[Rehnquist] collaborated with Harry Jaffa on Goldwater's speeches."
Note that the Taneys share black-on-gold spread eagles with the Hubbs, for "Rehnquist changed his middle name to Hubbs, a family name, because a numerologist told his mother he would be successful with a middle initial of H." Baloney. He must have changed to Hubbs for some other reason.
In my earliest years on the Hyksos, they were traced to the Samson "Daniy," wherefore note that both the Samson and Hubbs Crests use an upright blue lion. Massins/Masons (from Kent's island of THANet) use a blue lion. The Hubbs are also "Hobbs," suggesting the Hobbits of JJ Tolkien, whose surname traces both to the Tolkiens/Tooks of Kent, and to the Touques river near Falaise.
The United States is rigged to appear like a democracy when in fact it is ordered by Masons. Spit!
If Snowden is somehow acting as a pawn of Obama (doubtful), it would be hard to explain the following:
Germany's Der Spiegel magazine said National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden showed its reporters "parts" of a secret document from 2010 that outlined how the US had placed devices in the two EU embassies and gained access to their internal computer networks.
The document referred to the EU as a "target". According to Der Spiegel, the NSA also targeted telecommunications at the Justus Lipsius building in Brussels, home to the European Council, the collective of EU national governments.
..."On behalf of the European Parliament, I demand full clarification and require further information speedily from the US authorities with regard to these allegations," Martin Schulz, the President of the European Parliament said in a statement.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/10150905/NSA-surveillance-US-bugged-EU-offices.html
If some Americans are not yet convinced of the foul odor coming out of NSA, the above should start some noses running for cover. "Luxembourg Foreign Minister Jean Asselborn told Der Spiegel: 'If these reports are true, it's disgusting.'
AP is weighing in happily:
Senior European officials expressed concern Sunday at reports that U.S. intelligence agents bugged EU offices on both sides of the Atlantic, with some leftist lawmakers calling for concrete sanctions against Washington.
...The [Der Spiegel] magazine also didn't specify how it learned of the NSA's alleged eavesdropping efforts at a key EU office in Brussels. There, the NSA used secure facilities at NATO headquarters nearby to dial into telephone maintenance systems that would have allowed it to intercept senior EU officials' calls and Internet traffic, the Spiegel report said.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/N/NSA_SURVEILLANCE?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2013-06-30-11-02-16
Last I heard, the EU is not listed as a terrorist organization. NSA, therefore, has some mighty explaining to do. It's so nice to see this. Hayden is now acting the brazen idiot by telling Europe to look in the mirror at its own spy machinery, a statement intended to pit American citizen against European citizen. The fact remains: everyone knows it's wrong to listen in on the phone calls of world leaders, no matter that some expect us to get used to it as normal "relations."
The mass gatherings in Egypt are promising not to go home until Morsi steps down or calls a new election. Egypt is back on the edge. Already.