I Need a Break
You don't want to miss this message (compliments YS), unless Obama gets away with it yet again:
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States John Roberts [a Conservative / Republican] scheduled a case by attorney Orly Taitz dealing with Barack Hussein Obama's use of forged IDs to be heard in conference before the full Supreme Court.
This comes immediately after news, out on December 31, of Hillary's near-death experience in Iran (see "Hillary" in the last section of last update for that). I think we're going to see some Clinton supporters attack Obama when they get wind of that plane crash in Iran, and hopefully at least one of them will be a supreme court liberal that turns the tide against Obama, starting with this case.
I can't help noticing the Taitz surname in the article above. YS did not know that I would be tracing the line of king Tut in the last update. I haven't mentioned Tut for tears until the last update, and here I get an email with just an article having to do with a Taitz surname just as I'm tracing Tut to the Tate's/Taits, the ones who use the Annandale saltire and Chief. I mean, there could be no better surname that the Tate's/Taits to show that the line of Tut's family through Seti I was the one to the Sadducee, Ananias.
Here's an article (compliments from Tim) suggesting that the UN is not the one to worry about for infiltration into the United States, because the Brotherhood has eyes on Homeland Security with Obama as the vehicle:
Effectively affirming the concerns of five much-maligned Republican House members and the evidence presented in an investigative book, an Egyptian magazine claims six American Muslim leaders who work with the Obama administration are Muslim Brotherhood operatives who have significant influence on U.S. policy. [It's a long article]
In the update dated December 25 - 31, there was this sub-title: "The 600 Danites and 600 Benjamites were Keturah's Poseidon Migration Through Laish" I went on to claim in that update that my dream, verified to be from God (rare event for me), had the very message of revealing the Meshwesh nature of the 600 Danites, and it was concluded that the same Meshwesh had to do with the 600 Benjamites.
I opened an email from YS on January 10. The email only shared an article on an archeological dig in Israel. The email was dated December 26, meaning that YS had no idea I was writing that week on the Benjamites (from the book of Joshua). In fact, I probably didn't introduce those Benjamites until a few days after December 26, but in any case the update was released to the Internet until December 31. I was therefore stunned to read in the Archeological article:
Tel Motza and the surrounding region are renowned for their prime archaeological importance...
At the time, the site's archaeologists proposed once more identifying the site with the Biblical settlement "Mozah" mentioned in the Book of Joshua -- a town in the tribal lands of Benjamin bordering on Judaea (Joshua 18: 26)...
Is that not amazing, to find a location of MOZah in the land of Benjamites, a find that was due to an email on December 26, just days before I claimed that the "Benjamites" in the back of Judges were of the Mus / Mesha household from Tanis?
It means that God is not finished with this revelation. I don't know what He intends to do with it. But last week I took my first break from this topic in years. Feeling a little overwhelmed, I turned to something else and re-wrote a chapter; you're very welcome to check it out at Solar Heated Water. It's an invention for mixing different-temperature waters from the roof while standing in the shower.
I'm not sure whether there will be another week on something else before continuing with the Keturah and other topics of the last update. If you're a regular reader, you could probably use a break too.
Especially for new or confused readers
MYTH CODES 101
shows where I'm coming from.
For serious investigators:
How to Work with Bloodline Topics
Here's what I did when I had spare time on my hands:
Ladon Gog and the Hebrew Rose
On this page, you will find evidence enough that NASA did not put men on the moon.
Starting at this paragraph, there is a single piece of evidence -- the almost-invisible dot that no one on the outside was supposed to find -- that is enough in itself to prove the hoax.
End-times false signs and wonders may have to do with staged productions like the lunar landing.
The rest of the Gog-in-Iraq story is in PART 2 of the
Table of Contents