Seeing Avaris from Aphar
Praise God for Christians who love all the benefits of God. Although they acknowledge the disciplinary measures of God, they yet praise an all-powerful Father for the ultimate good that far outweighs the rough, and sometimes stinging, road in this life. Charismatics lifting hands to God are a good example of those who love God for the ultimate good, but that's not to say that Charismatic leaders are all true shepherds.
The irony is that some Charismatics lifting hands in gratitude do not recognize the false shepherds. My own sister shoots money over to Benny Hinn and his God of Plenty. How can this situation be explained aside from an underlying hope for having riches in this life?
The good things in the Good News feel good. The good things in the Good News is a substantial part of out spiritual diet. The Good News is food to make us feel good, to make us feel full, to make us feel secure. It's all good. How do people live without it?
But God is a feel-good God only secondarily. He is primarily a do-good God. One can feel good reading the Good News, but if one wants to really "eat" the good of God, it comes to us FROM HIM when we do good. When we first turn to Faith in unwavering joy, it is such a good thing in God's eyes that we sense the feel-good Spirit because he turns it on inside of us. "Living waters," said Jesus.
Even Better News is that there are a zillion ways to do good. There's no shortage of ways to get the feel-good from God, and the feel-good is like a rain that follows us for extended periods to keep us moist and happy, not dry and panting in spiritual desperation.
Jesus said, "I have food to eat that you know nothing about." He said it to his own disciples, before they had received the Spirit of God. And he said, not everyone who comes to me with , "Lord, Lord," will get the eternal life they desire. He went on to portray the "Lord-Lord"ers as charismatic types.
If I have a filthy mouth, doing good for God is to resist using cuss words. If I lie at times, doing good for God is to stop lying. If I take sneak peeks at online porn, doing good is to stop. JUST STOP IT. The world says, "Just do it." If I don't do the little things, like JUST STOP IT, then God reasons that I'm unfaithful, and will not do the larger things either. Jesus said as much.
JUST STOP IT is my definition of "waiting for Him." Don't participate in the sins of the world, just wait for him to bring a New Society. Don't get addicted. Work at breaking the sinful habit.
If I don't swear or lie or peek at porn, and don't hurt anyone, but mind my own life and my own wallet, and go about business honestly, even treating people at church with respect and with a listening ear, and I give tithes regularly too, but in the meantime I arrange sexual adventures in hotels with a "friend" against my spouse's knowledge, then I haven't done the good that God wants me to do. Do I get the feel-good from God for all the good things I do, minus a little feel-good for the adultery? Will I offer God a pie made of the best fruits but mixed with a little dung?
He'll spit it out and hate me. If I get punished severely as my reward, and if he turns off the feel-good tap only temporarily, even for a few years, I am lucky. On the other hand, if I sin but God does not punish, then I could be lost forever with no hope of enjoying the Holy Tap again.
In the same way, homosexuals should not think that God will reward them for whatever good they are to society or church. There are some things that turn God off so much that he turns away from us. He'll check in once in a while to see whether we've cleaned up our mess. Surprise Him the next time he checks in.
Even God decided that the best way to deal with humanity was to scare us. From the very beginning, he presented Himself to young Israel as the Really Scary One. If he would be a feel-good God continually, people would be more prone to sinning. We would say, I sinned, but I still get the Tap, so God must not mind my sin very much. Jesus dashed God's portrayal of the Scary One, showing that there was a KIND FATHER ruling the universe, but Jesus also said some pretty scary things amid his promise to eternal life. The Father and the Scary One are one and the same, he indicated.
How sweet it would be to please God and enter eternal life that way. That was Jesus' message, but with a warning not to enter while ashamed of our deeds. And frankly, I am ashamed of my life as a Christian. I am not happy with myself. I don't like all of myself. I wish that God could do something "magical" to make me like myself completely. But wouldn't I become proud? This bad feeling I feel might be the better way, for Jesus said there is more hope for the one who looks to the ground when addressing God than the one who looks upward not acknowledging their sinfulness.
When I was explaining God to my first son of age five or less, I told him that God was a "surprise"; He had a "surprise" for us. And that is truly the essence of Jesus' promises. Those who receive eternal life will be greatly surprised. But what of those who think they are a shoe-in?
If we really want to be good, we not only stop doing the wrong, but we relish in righteousness. We don't just stop doing the wrong to avoid punishment or receive rewards, but we admire the right way. We recognize that humanity cannot work as Intended without humans doing right to one another.
But doing right is not completely the same as doing good. Doing the right and just thing is good, but may do no special good to another. Doing good goes beyond doing right.
Even human laws (though not all) are made to keep humans treating one another good and right, and to create fair and just situations between parties, but God wants a people to have no laws, who do the right willingly and therefore need no laws to keep them "straight." The more laws a nation has made, the more it is an indication that things are wrong with its human population. AND, evil lawmakers can make laws that benefit themselves...which defines the globalist.
If we raise our hands before church members, do we then fail to raise the concept of Godly-good to the highest levels of human life? I know that's what Charismatics do...when they are young Christians. The problem is, they also sin greatly -- usually in adultery -- to the point where God no longer wants to know them (I'm of course not painting all Charismatics with the same brush). When they continue in their sin, they neglect raising Godly-good to the highest levels, but they continue to raise hands begging, sometimes in tears, for the feel-good experience that they once knew...when they held up Godly-good and promised to practice it.
In their dry-spell punishment, they have a choice, and there the devil is right inside the Charismatic preacher, teaching that a money-oriented Christian life is a Godly way to go. Do such and such, and God will reward you with nice things. FORGET IT. Forget nice things...unless you're buying them for others. Be raw warrior for Christ; don't get cooked by the "American dream."
Be happy with the life inside you, amid the Creation of God which includes the human "family" (i.e. what's left of human family). The condition of the inside is all that matters. Don't let anyone look down on you because you don't have the latest nice things. And don't sweat it either. This is the Way to go toward the Super Surprise.
Lest we forget as we wait for the King, let's not neglect the importance of "the good." It is fast-disappearing from the planet, and we might start to feel that it's an old, extinct dinosaur, but the hold-out Christian will think to do good for others when they need it. Every law forbidding an evil has a flip side. "Though shall not commit adultery or else" has the flip side of: Enjoy being happily loyal to your spouse because it will give you a better Super Surprise. God has given us many years to rack up "Heavenly rewards."
Most of Canada is a pathetically liberal country, pushing the homo-marriage controversy in favor of homosexuals to the point of shutting everyone else up. And Canada has forced people to pay for state-paid abortions for years. There has for years been no abortion law at all, ever since one was struck down by Henry Morgentaller's court challenge. He, along with the late prime minister Pierre Trudeau, were leading members of the Humanists, and Trudeau stacked the Supreme court with humanists, wherefore Canadians are being forced to abide by dim, humanist/atheistic ideals. Below is a story using the "just" word, as if there's not much really wrong with child sex:
"The lawyers for a Burnaby, B.C., man who admitted to having sex with young girls while travelling overseas say their client was JUST [caps mine] a customer of willing participants.
...Klassen pleaded guilty in May to having sex with 14 girls as young as nine years old in Cambodia and Colombia between 1998 and 2002.
The father of three also pleaded guilty to importing child pornography after he tried to mail himself DVDs bought overseas, some containing bestiality, others showing sex with six-year-olds."
It's the Eros mentality coming our way. We will be inundated with child-sex news until we become indifferent to it. One could report things like this endlessly, but it only makes us numb to read on it continually.
For what it could be worth to prophecy: "Deputy Speaker of Russia's State Duma Vladimir Zhirinovsky said [yesterday] that 'the unilateral US sanctions against Iran are in violation of international regulations' and called for efforts for lifting the restrictions."
This is the first I've heard from him, in a long time, lashing out at the West. In fact, as I check up on him fairly regularly at EIN News, he has rarely, if ever in the past two years, been reported there as mentioning the United States.
We're waiting for someone with more courage and confidence than the current leaders of Iran and Libya. Both chickened out and fell by the wayside when sending flotillas to Gaza. The Lebanese are still clamoring about sending a ship with Palestinian resistance on board, but so far nothing. And Turkey has been silent on its flotilla threats too. Then there is the Chicago axis:
"A fundraising campaign is currently underway in the United States to finance the purchase of an American ship in an effort to break the Israeli naval blockade of the Gaza Strip in the early autumn. The ship is to be named after U.S. President Barack Obama's book 'The Audacity of Hope.'
If that isn't enough to stir the ghosts of the 2008 American presidential election, one of the prominent figures to support the initiative is Columbia University history professor Rashid Khalidi, a well-known critic of Israel whose friendship with the American president from their days together in Chicago engendered criticism of Obama.
An email being circulated by pro-Palestinian activists in the U.S. said the goal of the fundraising campaign is to raise at least $370,000 next month to obtain possession of a ship that could accommodate between 40 and 60 people and for operational expenses. The e-mail said the ship will join a flotilla of other vessels from Europe, Canada, India, South Africa and the Middle East in an additional attempt to break the Israeli naval blockade."
This is "good" for Super Surprise watchers. It means that the Egyptian theater is becoming a world-wide emphasis just as Babylon has no king, and that the worldwide emphasis might involve the False-Prophet enterprise. BUT Obama is not at all acting the part of false prophet.
General Odierno was quoted as saying that Kirkuk is likely the last place from which American soldiers will remove themselves from Iraq, in 2011. Assuming that the Biblical "king of Babylon" is becoming impatient with America's razzle-dazzle Turtle Show, we may not need to wait until after 2011. Odierno is calling for a UN presence in northern Iraq, but I also read that the UN is not interested enough to be moving on this request. The imminent minor crisis expected by many could change that.
The Jeremiah 50-51 prophecy on Babylon appears to have the ancient destruction of Nebuchadnezzar's Babylon in view while also Tailoring the words for the end-time destruction of the anti-Christ's Babylon. In 51:6, there is the Direction to flee Babylon, just as in Revelation 18 where Babylon the Great is the topic. 51:8 says that Babylon will suddenly fall, just as in Revelation 18.
In 51:7, Babylon is said to be the cup/grail of God (depicts His wrath to be poured out) that makes the nations drunk and mad, which is not only the picture of Babylon the Great in Revelation 17, but a picture of the Dionysus-Maenad cult. In fact, I do trace the pagan "holy grail" to Dionysus because he was from CADmus. Perhaps God used the symbolism in Revelation 17 to depict the Dionysus cult. In any case, the Babylon of Revelation 17 is more than Babylon the country and city, and the Jeremiah text above serves to show that she, the Roman empire, traces to Babylon the city.
It dawned on me last night that "Tanit," and therefore "Tanis," was a variation of "Anat." I know that other terms got a capital T, or lost a capital T. The Tanit=Anat equation well explains why ANATolia was settled by Hyksos of Tunisia. In fact, I traced them in recent days to Lycian domains, and we can be sure that the central colony that named Anatolia was ANTyla of Pisidian Lycia. Thus, as I've identified ANTYLa with the capital-T version, "TANTALus," it must be true that "Tanit," the Tuareg goddess, became Tantalus=Antyla. That proves one of the first inklings I had in Hyksos traces, that they trace to Pelops, son of Tantalus, rulers of the ENETi.
That sets up the next discovery, which was made last night while opening an email from CC: "Avaris," the Hyksos capital on the Nile delta, was also "Auaris," but when one adds a capital T, it brings up the Tuareg-like "Tuaris." It's important to know that the peoples were Tuareg, not Tuareg, for it matches the vowel positions of "Auaris."
After making that realization, I went back to the Wikipedia article to see what the Egyptian version of "Auaris" was/is, and it turned out to have a 't' immediately before the "uar." Egyptians called the city, Hut-waret. And Tuaregs were also "Twaregs" (I'm assuming that the "et," "eg," and "is" were suffixes so that "Uar/War" and/or "Tuar/Twar were the roots.
One then has reason to believe that the Zeus Taurus depicted Hyksos of Avaris! it certainly explains why I could barely make out the difference between Zeus and the Hyksos out of Egypt. In this picture, it was the Hyksos-branch Zeus cult that abducted Europe -- the Babylon-the-Great of Revelation 17. Revelation must have used the woman on the back of the anti-Christ because it was from an older picture of Europa on the back of the Hyksos Taurus. It works!
One can now trace Hyksos to the two Taurus regions, one in Cilicia, where I locate the pagan holy grail as mythical Cilix (chalice-like code for Cilicia), brother of Cadmus. The other Taurus region was in the Crimea (north shore of Black sea), out of which came the Sarmations on that Tanais river! I did trace Sarmations to "Taurus" because they were also "Sauromatians."
INCREDIBLE revelation here! And that's what God wants us to know: the end-time anti-Christ, Gog, will be a Hyksos representative, one passing through the Cretan domain and into Europe. The problem for solving the mystery is: Putin is insisting that Russia is a part of Europe. It therefore continues to be difficult to ascertain from mythical and Biblical symbolism whether the anti-Christ will be Western or Russian.
Jeremiah 51 goes on to say that Babylon will be defeated by an alliance of nations to Babylon's north, and identifies them as Medes in the land of Mannae, Ararat, and Ashkelon. Wikipedia says that Mannae was centered south of lake Urmia at Mahabad (in Iran but close to the northern Iraq border), almost exactly in the Qandil mountains, where the PKK -- Kurdish militia -- have main headquarters. The Qandils/Kandils are in Iraq where Iran, Turkey and Iraq borders meet. For the low-down on PKK activity, google "Kandil."
The location of Biblical Ashkenaz is not known exactly, and I don't think that the end-time attack on Babylon by the Medes=Kurds will be by Germanics. Germany was actually called "Ashkenaz," and the term has been linked to both "Scyth(ian" and "Scand(inavia)." I tend to locate Ashkenaz on the east side of the Tigris, where Kirkuk is located.
By the way, Kirkuk is also "Karka," evoking the Karkija variation of the land of Caria. It is all-too likely that the early Hyksos, whom I identify with the Hayasa-Azzi (named after Hayk=Hayastan=Armenia), were Guti-branch Kassites from Kirkuk. Note too that Crimean Taurus was also "Azov/Azou."
The idea coming to mind is that the Hyksos anti-Christ will be invaded by the very regions and peoples that were the original Hyksos. In fact, the other location, ARArat, from which the end-time invasion of Babylon may originate, was on the south side of the Aras river, thus indicating mythical Ar/ARA of the Armenian pantheon, who became Ares, and who was an early symbol for the Hyksos. The region of Azzi was to the west of Ararat, but may have included Ararat at times.
Note the important Hayasa king, Hakkani, who merged in a marital alliance with the Hatti princess. The article doesn't tell what happened to the Hayasa when they disappeared from Hatti domains, by myth indicates Lydus-Lydia, and the Sardis capital on the Hermus river. Fortunately, I have recalled over the years, because I thought it would one day prove important, that Sardis (in Manisa province, likely from Mannae elements) was also "Hyde." I didn't even think to connect "Hyde" to Hyksos...until now. It smacks of "Hades."
I had suggested that "Her"ules was from "Kirkuk," and also that he was the Nergal lion symbol of Cutha (I'm thinking a Guti locality). The symbol of Armenia today, a nation calling itself, Hayastan, is a lion, as was the symbol of Lydian Hercules. Thus, there appears to be some good logic for a Hyksos trace to Kirkuk, especially as the city was first Arrapachitis/ARABhka (Hermes=Armenia of the Ara cult was made father of Arabus), while Hyksos were just traced solidly to the Arphaxadite dragon of Ares.
In that picture, ancient Armenia was as far south from modern Armenia as Kirkuk, and this is supported by the location of Mannae, just about as far south as Kirkuk. Thus, Kirkuk/Arabkha was a "son" or extension of Hermes=Armenia. As difficult as it is to believe, the Hyksos were not only Rus and Scythians, but the original Arabs, and as such are expected to be arch-enemies of Israel in the end-times. Or, the anti-Christ can be predicted to be a Rus-Arab alliance against Israel, taking his place in the ancient homelands of the Arabs from Mosul to Kirkuk.
But only to be destroyed in Iraq by the modern Guti>Medes.
I find it acceptable to suggest that the False prophet traces back to the Mitanni at Wassukanni/Washukanni. While "Mitanni" could have been in honor of Medes, or even Midianites, "Wassu" smacks of the Azzi. This jibes with a trace of both the Hyksos and Wassukanni elements to the FreeMASON founders of WASHington.
What if the Americans, now siding closely with Kurds, go on to seize Iraq in the name of world security, and what if the anti-Christ turns out to be an American agent? Could we envision an attack on the American forces by the Kurds, who would then perceive the Americans as using them to seize Iraq? Once seized, the American anti-Christ could toss the Kurds over the shoulder like one tossing an apple core after munching on the apple.
The trace of Hyksos to Sardis' Hyde term is important for identifying the Shardana/Sardinian and Peleset/Philistine Sea Peoples as Hyksos returning to Egypt seeking to conquer it once again. See third update of this month for a Hades identification with the Philistine portion, in particular, of the Hyksos.
The Wikipedia article of Lydia says that Lydians called themselves "Sparda," evoking not only the mythical trace of Pelops (king of Lydia) to Atreus-branch SPARTA, but suggesting that "Sardis" was a corruption of "Spard." In this picture, the Sepharvites of SUBARTU that I traced to Spartans were first at Sparta! I didn't know that before. Subartu was smack in the Mosul-to-Kirkuk stretch.
In fact, look at the Sephar-like term: "The endonym Sfard (the name the Lydians called themselves) survives in bilingual and trilingual stone-carved notices of the Achaemenid Empire: the satrapy of Sparda..." (brackets not mine). The article goes on to say that Etruscans do not derive from Lydians due to a lack of evidence, as though the writer is blind to the Latins living beside Etruscans, or that mythical Dascylus, father of the Gyges that he/she mentions, isn't visible in the location of Tusculus on the Etruscan-Latin border.
People. Hyksos out of Lydia founded Rome, the city that ruled over all the kings of the earth when the last line of Revelation 17 was written.
The earliest Dascylus (Mysian/Moesi entity; his wife was made ANTHemoisia) was made a son of TANTalus, if that helps to link Anat-based Hyksos to the Etruscan founders of Rome.
In this new picture wherein the Tantalus line from Antalya to Lydia was Tunis-branch Danaan, the Etruscans and Latins were also Danaan, which is exactly what Hercules of Lydia suggests. The Celtic goddess Danu, not only traced to Danaans, as others suggest, but if we remove the capital, we are left with "Anu." Just as "Tanis>Tanit" was likely a T-less "Anat," so we would trace Danaans to the Sumerian, Anu, and his proto-Anat wife, Antu. The Anu cult was fundamental to Inana (= dragon queen of the heavens), who is known to be proto-Ishtar of Babylon and therefore the proto-Harlot of Revelation 17. Remember, it has been proven, they say, by archaeologists that Tanit of Tunisia was the Astarte of Syrio-Phoenicia.
What do we get when we tack a 'D' on "Inana," who was obviously an Anu entity? We get the origin of the Danaans, and it has not to do with the tribe of Dan.
A D-less Dascylus becomes "Ascylus." Ascalon? Scylla?
Hmm, just found a headline telling that Iraqi leader with Hayk-like surname is urging Maliki to step down:
"Neighborhood: chairman called on the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq Ammar al-Hakim, head of outgoing premier Nuri al-Maliki to step down...
Hakim said that al-Maliki to step down and make way for others to form a new government in Iraq and end the political vacuum...
...Hakim urged "all Iraqi politicians 'to make every effort to reach a solution before the parliament session scheduled for the July 28 this, saying that any delay is unacceptable.'"
Who is Hakim? Only the leader of the Shi'ite political entities to which the Maliki Shi'ites are now indebted for keeping Allawi off the throne:
"Sayyed Ammar al-Hakim is an Iraqi politician who leads the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq, which was the largest party in Iraq's Council of Representatives from the 2003 Invasion of Iraq until the 2010 Iraqi elections. ...As a result of his tireless fight against terrorism in Iraq, he has been subjected to 14 assassination attempts."
Hakim doesn't sound like anti-Christ material. His push to have Maliki step down is the expected. Maliki could be out of running within two weeks. The Hakims are agents somewhat of Iran, and as such could be the Shi'ite factor merging the anti-Christ with Iran's bid to topple West-backed Iraq.
On the other hand, Maliki's Iraq is no longer West-friendly, just West-using, so that the West could actually end up toppling "West-backed" Iraq. That's how complicated this situation is, that one cannot predict the outcome. The West is not going to sit idly by and allow Iran to take Iraq, unless Obama has no choice due to political pressure at home.
The Hyksos revelation is becoming more meaningful by the day. Today, I can show that the Meshwesh were very-likely Hyksos. You decide.
When I became somewhat convinced that RH negative blood, which CC says transferred from Hyksos to Tuaregs before entering Europe's Basques, it started to offer logic for the hypothesis that the two diseases due to corrupt genes -- that I had linked to Mascis/Masseys -- trace back to the Meshwesh Libyans that lived in/beside Tuareg regions. I said (previous update page): "This is very good evidence for what I could only ignore until now, that the RH negative blood of Touaregs links to the same "Libyan" (i.e. Meshwesh) bloodlines that brought porphyria and Parkinson's to Meschins."
At the time that I started mentioning the Meshwesh (first time, previous update), and until last night, I hadn't yet gotten to the Wikipedia article on the Meshwesh, which says: "Scholars believe [the Meshwesh] would be the same tribe called Mazyes by Hektaios and Maxyes by Herodotus, while it was called 'Mazaces' and 'Mazax' in Latin sources. All those names are similar to the name used by the Berbers for themselves, Imazighen."
The great thing about that sentence is that I don't need to go to extents to prove to you that Meshwesh were indeed related to the Tuaregs, who were called "Mazices" and "Amazighen," terms that were applied to Berber tribes. AND, one can easily see a link to "Massey/Masci" and even "Max(well/ton)."
The article has information tending to prove that both the Tuaregs and Meshwesh had been Hyksos out of Egypt. It was just yesterday that I caught sight for a trace of "Tuareg" to a T-less "Avaris," but I neglected to mention as evidence that "Amazighen" and its variations themselves had T-versions such as "Tamazighen" to indicate females and tribes. I don't know how far back the T and T-less aspect goes back in Hyksos history, but I suggested it went back as far as an Inana-verses-Dinana>Danaan couplet.
The Bible does mention a Dinay peoples, where "ay" is a suffix like pout "ite." I had, years ago, suggested a Danaan link, not to Danites, but to Dinay=Dinites (found in the list of peoples in Ezra 4:9, though some Bible versions leave the term out, interpreting it as something other than peoples, in the same way that some leave Rosh out of Ezekiel 38).
I started to read the Wikipedia article, already having in mind that Cyrene was what is today the eastern half of Libya, while Tuaregs lived in what is now the western half of Libya. I also knew the Meshwesh were a part of the Libyan Sea Peoples that had attacked the Egypt of pharaoh Rameses, and as I believed that the Sea Peoples were various Hyksos branches attempting to get Egypt back, I figured that the Meshwesh could likewise be. But I was not prepared to find the surprising fact that the below points out (square brackets mine):
"The Meshwesh (often abbreviated in ancient Egyptian as Ma) were an ancient Libyan (i.e. Berber) tribe from Cyrenaica. During the 19th and 20th Dynasties [Hyksos were booted out of Egypt at the start of the 18th dynasty], the Meshwesh were in almost constant conflict with the Egyptian state. In the late 21st Dynasty, increasing numbers of Meswesh Libyans began to settle in the Western Delta region of Egypt. They would ultimately take control of the country during the late 21st Dynasty..."
The article also tells: "The Meshwesh are known from ancient Egyptian texts as early as the 18th Dynasty," and as that is when the Hyksos were booted out, I began to envision that Meshwesh were indeed a part of the Hyksos...who sought to gain the Nile delta back almost-immediately afterward, as soon as they could get settled into their new desert land. It shocked me to find that the Meshwesh had actually become pharaohs of Egypt. I didn't include, in the quote above, the list of Meshwesh pharaohs, but will mention them below.
There has been some controversy in archaeological circles concerning the identification of Tanis, Avaris and Rameses, some seeing Rameses and Avaris as being the same city, some not, and some seeing Tanis and Avaris as the same cities. In any case, all three are identified with exactly the same north-eastern part of the delta, where the Pelusiac branch is the most easterly. I had read, and was convinced by mythology (BELUS, father of Danaus), that Tanis was on the PELUSsiac, and so I was scratching me head when reading (last night) that Tanis was on another delta branch, the Tanitic (note the similarity with "Tanit"):
Tanis, the Greek name of ancient Djanet...is a city in the north-eastern Nile delta of Egypt. It is located on the Tanitic branch of the Nile which has long since silted up.
Tanis was founded in the late Twentieth dynasty [1100-1065 BC], and became the northern capital of Egypt during the following Twenty-first dynasty. It was the home city of Smendes [reigned 1077/1076-1052 BC], founder of the 21st dynasty. "
This was not good. It makes Tanis to be a city only after the Hyksos were ejected from Egypt, and it therefore undermined my claim, that it was a Hyksos city of the Hyksos-based Greek Danaans. At this point, before reading elsewhere, I began to think that there had to have been an earlier Tanis, on the Pelusiac, and was gratified to find evidence with a little more searching.
The problem with the picture presented by Wikipedia is that Smendes/Mendes, the first pharaoh and "founder" of Tanis on the Tanitic, lived in the same generation as the founding of the city, which doesn't allow enough time for the city to be built to prominent/capital status. It makes more sense that archaeologists have goofed on that "fact," and that Tanis existed before Smendes. It might even have been possible for the Tanitic branch to have been the Pelusiac in those ancient days, for on this map of the Nile delta, one can see how close the Tanitic was to the Pelusiac.
In any case, Belus, father of Danaus is easily identifiable as a peoples on the Pelusiac settling and founding Tanis...in years before the Danaan Greeks emerged, which was centuries before the so-called "founding" of Tanis on the Tanitic.
Smendes is of an unknown (or so they say) bloodline, but I strongly suspect that he was of Meshwesh elements because Meshwesh were settling the delta at the time and seeking to take it from the Egyptians.
"While Smendes' precise origins remain a mystery, he is thought to have been a powerful governor in Lower Egypt during the Renaissance era of Ramesses XI and his base of power was Tanis."
I should mention that the archeological site of Tanis today is called, Hagar. We have no doubt that Freemasons took a special interest in Tanis exploration, as they believe to come from that place, though they do not want the world to know. The modern discoverer of Tanis believed that he had found the Hyksos capital, Avaris, but others came to disagree for a reason(s) I don't yet know:
"Napoleon Bonaparte had the site surveyed in the late 1700s...
...Pierre Montet...conclusively proved that Tanis could not have been Avaris (Tell el-Dab'a) or Piramesse [= Pi Rameses]. Montet also discovered royal tombs of the 21st and 22nd Dynasties at Tanis...Four of the tombs belonged to Psusennes I (1039-991 BC), Amenemope (993-984 BC), Osorkon II (874-850 BC) and Sheshonq III (825-733 BC)...However, the hawk-headed silver coffin of Sheshonq II was also found in Psusennes' tomb, as well as the coffin and sarcophagus of Amenemope. The sarcophagus of Takelot II (850-825 BC) was found in the tomb of Osorkon II."
AMAZING!! The list of Meshwesh pharaohs, as given by Wikipedia, are:
"...first under king Osorkon the Elder. After an interregnum of 38 years, during which the native Egyptian kings Siamun and Psusennes II assumed the throne, ruled Egypt throughout the 22nd and 23rd Dynasties under such powerful kings as Shoshenq I, Osorkon I, Osorkon II, Shoshenq III and Osorkon III respectively."http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanis,_Egypt
THEY DID TAKE TANIS BACK!! That's what the Sea Peoples were after all along. The Meshwesh article makes the point that after the Meshwesh supported Libyan Sea Peoples in their bid to take Egypt, the Meshwesh became the primary force to that end. One could even conjecture that the Sea-People invasion(s), which included Trojan and Anatolian peoples, was concocted by the Libyan-Meshwesh axis.
I found this in Britannica:
"[Tanis]...was shifted from Per Ramessu, and about 1075 BC the 21st-dynasty pharaohs made Tanis their capital."
Aha! There was another Tanis that was shifted to Tanis on the Tanitic, and the first one was later Pi Rameses, meaning that pharaohs named Rameses (the one(s) whom the Sea Peoples attacked) had taken Tanis for their own capital. On Pi-Rameses, Britannica says:
"...also called Pi Ramesse, biblical Raamses...the city lay in ancient times on the Bubastite branch of the Nile River."
Unfortunately, the Bubastite is not shown on the map above, but the info below suggests that it was a tributary of the Pelusiac, and may therefore have been the Pelusiac in ancient times. I've noted that "Buba" could modify to "Berb":
"Bubastis served as the capital of the nome of Am-Khent, the Bubastite nome, the 18th nome of Lower Egypt. Bubastis was situated southwest of Tanis, upon the eastern side of the Pelusiac branch of the Nile...
It became a royal residence after Shoshenq I, the first ruler of the 22nd dynasty..."
Why did a Meshwesh ruler of the delta choose Bubastis for his capital? Was this location the other Tanis, the Tanis of the earlier Hyksos? I'll leave the topic at that question for now, and will hopefully answer it at another time. Another article (below), which equated Pi Rameses with Avaris, tends to equate Avaris with Tanis too. I read elsewhere that Pi Rameses was built by Rameses, not on the site of Avaris, but adjacent to its ruins.
Thus, Tanis and Avaris could have been twin cities, one belonging to the Avars/Tubali, and the other to the Sarmations/Allens>Hellenes of the Tanais. Recall the topic of days ago, that the Tuaregs were from the Taurus/Saurus term, and that they appear to have settled amongst Tubali in Libya, which jibes with a Meshech identity for the Mazaces peoples that were the Meshwesh.
These things conclude for me a Meshwesh link to Tanis in particular, not only because Greek Danaans founded Mycenae (which by the way smacks of Amazighen terms), but because I had linked Meschins to Alans>Stewarts, while Sarmations at Tanais were Alan huns. Meschins and Stewarts were also Veres, and the latter smack of "Avaris."
I'm not ready yet to deal with the Biblical fact that Israelites, in their Exodus, started out from a city called, Rameses. It makes one think that Israelites were at Tanis, and therefore that Tanis was named after Dan. BUT, the Rameses who made Tanis/Avaris his capital lived after the Exodus. AND, we fully expect that Freemasons who know their Hyksos past would seek to control Egyptology, and in the meantime make provisions to disguise the fact. It could even be that Pi Rameses was identified wrongly as Avaris and Tanis simply because Freemasons wanted us to believe, or may have wanted themselves to believe, that they trace to Israelites...and that Hyksos were Israelites, not of the Exodus pharaoh.
It is important to know that Egyptologists are in error with their dating. They place the ejection of Hyksos a couple of generations before the Exodus (1446 BC). I'll come back to this important topic as I have the info, and a green light, to proceed. I envision that, immediately after the sea closed in on the Biblical pharaoh's army, the Hyksos appointed a new ruler(s), and mustered as best they could under their dire circumstances, but were defeated by other Egyptian pharaohs (further up the Nile), especially by Ahmose I (dated 1550-25). Ahmose' final defeat of the Hyksos is dated around 1530, some 75 years before the Exodus.
A little info on Avaris:
"The name in Egyptian was Hatwaret, meaning [blah blah]...Both t's in the word were silent and it was vocalized something like 'Hawara', which is the same name (even today) as the site at the entrance to the Faiyum, which in ancient times was also called Ha(t)ware(t) and Auaris."
I checked Avaris-like surnames, but with a capital T. There was a Tavaris surname in Vere colors. It is an Italian surname "First found in Benavente." Hmm, that's where AVellino is. I then checked for a Devere surname and got the Vere Coat showing a Devere variation.
Recalling that I linked Hyksos into Phoenicia (as opposed to Hyksos out of Libya to Caria) with the Daphne cult, I now find that the Tavern Crest is a dove holding a laurel branch, the latter being a symbol for Daphne. Moreover, the Tabenor, Tabiner, and Taviner variations reflect "Daphne" fairly well. In fact, these surnames are essentially the hypothetical "Taben" variation of "Tabal" that I figured created "Daphne" in the first place. The Tavern/Tabenor Coat uses a red roundel, the Tavaris Coat symbol! The Tavaris surname has a TAVENeri variation!! Just like that, the Italian Tavaris' are traced to Taver and Taben surnames of England.
Checking the Daver surname, it's in the Tavaris/DeVere colors. The Tabar/Taber Coat uses "Soles" as a motto term, which itself brings up the Spanish Soles/Solana Coat in the same red-on-gold colors! The Tabar Coat itself uses the same colors in its chevron, AND, Tabars were first found in Essex, where the Taverns/Tabenors were first found.
The Tabar Shield is reflective of the German Turk/Tuerck Shield, the latter surname first found in SILESia. Again, the Tabar motto term; Soles. A few days ago, I traced TUARegs to the Turk/TUERck surname, even as I traced the Meshwesh to the proto-Meschins that named king Mieszko of Poland/Silesia, who was from Sardinians and therefore likely from Sulcis (of Sardinia) that named Silesia.
On to the German Taber Coat, where we find a woman holding grapes in her right hand, as with the ancient image of Tanit(goddess of the Tuaregs!) near the bottom of the page. One article verifies: "[Tanit's] other symbols include the dove, grapes and the pomegranate..." The dove was symbol to Ishtar/Astarte. There are even French, Tannat grapes for wine-making. Clearly, Tanit was the tart of Revelation 17 holding a "wine" cup in her hand.
German Tabers were first found in Greifswald, and the German/Bavarian Greif surname uses a griffen, making me think that the griffen may have been created for heraldry by that family.
NOW, it came to mind that "Tavaris" should have S-versions, and the Savary/Savard surname came to mind that I had linked to the Sforzas. The French Savard surname not only uses roundels/besants (in Sforza colors), but on a Turk/Teurck Shield...like the Tabar/Tabert Shield ("Tabert" is like "Savard").
The idea is that the Italian Tavaris surname became "Sforza." But now I can add that, since I had traced the Savary surname to Sepharvites, the Avaris location, if indeed it had a feminine Tavaris root, may have derived from Sepharvites. They too sacrificed children/infants in fires, as did the cults of Carthage.
I noted that the Irish Door/Dorly Coat uses the Sforza lion in the same colors. English Doors/Doreys use bees, the symbol of child-sacrificing cults, and of honey-wine. I checked Dor/Door surnames because I trace "Taurus," not only to Tyrus, but to nearby Dor...where some Sea Peoples ended up. In Greece, peoples of Dor were Dorians with myth-code, "Dorus" and possibly "Dryas."
The French Doris Coat looks a little like the French Torcy/Taureci Coat, and they were near one another, the Doris' first in Dauphine and the Torcys first in Burgundy. The Doris surname is said to be of a D'Oris location, smacking of the Orsini surname that founded the Benevento surname (Tavaris' were first in Benevento). Orsinis use a green snake, the old symbol of the Sforzas as they got it from the Visconti snake...with an Aryan infant in its mouth!
The Orsini's may use the Mazza/Mazzi rose, and the latter could have been in honor of the Mazaces/Meshwesh/Mazyes/Mazax. Compare the Mazza/Mazzi Coat to the Tavern Coat.
By the way, as I trace the Surrey surname to Tyre/Surru, note that the Surrey Coatit smacks of the Dan/Dannes Coat. Surreys were first found in Daphne-founded Devon, as were the English Savarys.
I had traced Veres to the Varni Germanics of Polabia, and so note that the Varney Coat uses blue stars on white, three of them across the horizontal arm of the cross, as in the Scottish Vere>Weir Coat using the three stars in colors reversed. Varneys were from Vernai of Bayeaux/Bessin, near the Veres of Manche and smack where the Meschins lived!
LOOKIE at where Obama's (i.e. your) bank-bailout money went:
"Goldman Sachs received a $12.9 billion payout from the government's bailout of AIG, which was at one time the world's largest insurance company.
Goldman Sachs sent $4.3 billion [one-querter of what they received] in federal tax money to 32 entities, including many overseas banks, hedge funds and pensions, according to information made public [July 24].
Goldman Sachs disclosed the list of companies to the Senate Finance Committee after a threat of subpoena from Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Ia.
...[Grassley] added, 'We thought originally we were bailing out AIG. Then later on ... we learned that the money flowed through AIG to a few big banks, and now we know that the money went from these few big banks to dozens of financial institutions all around the world.'"
We're not going to get the truth from Goldman-Sachs if they can help it, and Obama is not going to admit that he took tax dollars deliberately to pay off the banking people who got him elected. When someone who is a candidate for False Prophet is closely yoked to the largest financial institution(s) of the world, look-out for the skincode.
Why shouldn't we suspect that Obama's handle on the Middle-East military is anything more than a further pay-off to those who got him elected, and those who would repay him by keeping him strong into a second term? This is a LOT like a tyrant and a fascist.
The revelations concerning Obama's money-happy handouts have weakened him at just the time that Iran has its eyes on a Baghdad bullseye, and a fiery dart in its hand. Iran is at this time begging to enter into a nuclear swap deal with the West, but I see this sudden turn as a distraction, a fake co-operation to buy just a little more time until Maliki is off the Iraqi throne, and until the American fighters are reduced to white-collar status.
If Maliki steps down, one would think that there will be a peaceful transition of power to a Shi'ite-party alliance, which could be the end of the potential crisis. However, I would at that time watch for deeper inroads of the Iran axis into Iraq...which could bring in a Russian anti-Christ. I've not concentrated on this possibility until now, that the Gogi anti-Christ would enter Iraq while pro-Iran agents are on the Iraqi throne.
Just as the leaked top-secret documents (that should be all over the television news) have emphasized the war-crimes conducted by NATO in Afghanistan, or more specifically the deliberate targeting of Afghan civilians -- which brings general-Mattis mentality to mind -- we find this news:
"KABUL: At least 45 civilians, many women and children, were killed in a rocket attack by the NATO-led force in Afghanistan's southern Helmand province last week, a spokesman for the Afghan government said [today].
The incident happened in Helmand's Sangin district on [July 23]..."
The major media that leaked the top-secret files promised WikiLeaks not to do so until July 25. Is this "coincidence" an example of how God is exposing the globetrotters? Or, how stupid are the globetrotters that they would burn their own reputation like this? Remember, it's "fun" to kill Afghans. We await to see how entertaining the war will yet become as Mattis is sworn in as the King of Fun.
To find who the Exodus Hyksos was, we need to find a pharaoh with a first-born son who didn't make it to pharaoh status. There is at least one such Hyksos in Khyan, perhaps the "greatest" of the Hyksos, known from Babylon to Knossos in Crete. In the piece below, there is no mention/allusion whatsoever to the Exodus:
"The Danish Egyptologist, Kim Ryholt, who published an extensive catalogue of the monuments of all the numerous pharaohs of the Second Intermediate Period notes an important personal detail regarding [Khyan's] king's family. He states that:a stela set up in Avaris contains the nomen and prenomen of Khayan and a now lost dedication (presumably to Seth, Lord of Avaris) below which are inscribed the title and name of the Eldest King's Son Yanassi. The association of Khayan with those of his eldest son upon this stela suggests that the latter in fact was his designated successor, as also implied by his title.
Khyan was, however, succeeded by Apophis who apparently was a usurper...Since both Bietak and Ryholt record that Yanassi was apparently Khyan's designated successor, Apophis may have staged a coup d'etat to seize power == perhaps immediately after the death of Khyan to pre-empt the latter's son from assuming the throne."
There are others who claim that Apophis was a usurper, and moreover not related to Khyan. BUT, no one that I read last night suggested that Khyan's son died, which could then make Apophis, not necessarily a usurper, but an "elected" pharaoh when Khyan dies suddenly without an heir.
This genealogy has the Hyksos going back to Jacob, son of Isaac, son of Abraham. It is truly a very silly idea, held even by Josephus. If the Hyksos were the Biblical Israelites, under servitude and slavery to the pharaohs for over 200 years, how can we then claim that Israelites were the Hyksos who ruled Egypt for almost, or perhaps more than, 200 years? Khyan managed to conquer as far as south as Thebes, and was at peace with most of the 17th, Theban dynasty. How could they have been Israelites??? Unless you're willing to massacre the Biblical account, toss that theory to the garbage. We know that Josephus was not exactly a loyal Israelite:
"...Josephus (c. Apion. i. 14), who identifies the Hyksos with the Israelites, preserves a passage from the second book of Manetho giving an account of them...At length [the Hyksos] elected a king named Salatis, who, residing at Memphis, made all Egypt tributary, and established garrisons in different parts, especially eastwards, fearing the Assyrians. He built also a great fortress at Avaris, in the Sethroite nome, east of the Bubastite branch of the Nile [that indicates the Pelusiac, the most-eastern branch]. Salatis was followed in succession by Beon, Apachnas, Apophis, Jannas and Asses. These six kings reigned 198 years and 10 months, and all aimed at extirpating the Egyptians. Their whole race was named Hyksos...and some say they were Arabs..."
The last-named of the big-six, Asses, is interesting to me, for I had linked that very term to the Samson cult, which I claimed was the Hyksos out of Egypt. It's known that Asses was the same as Khamudi i.e. Khamudy Aasehre. Khamudi happens to be the last Hyksos pharaoh, placed by Egyptologists immediately after Apophis, who was expelled from Egypt!! His people, in escaping to Gaza, could therefore have become the Samson cult. That is, later elements of these Egypto-Hebrews inserted themselves as the Samson "Daniy", in their typical myth style, at the end of the book of Judges, where we find that they conquered Laish in the Tyre theater.
Kamudi's first fall to the Theban pharaohs has been dated to the 33rd year of Apophis (Avaris fell a few years later), meaning 33 years after the Exodus...if Khyan was the Exodus pharaoh.
Hmm, the official blue color of heraldry is called, cyan.
It could prove to be important that Manetho, who by the way seems to me to be of RhadaMANTHUS elements, apparently gives Khyan the name of Apachnas. The German Pach/Bach Coat is a gold cow...on a cyan Shield. Remember the golden calf that Israelites made in fear, to honor the Egyptian pharaoh whom had held them captive. The Pach/Back cow is called a "steer," and checking the Steer surname, the motto used the phrase, "Tu ne cede," which, apart from the "ede" sounds just like "Tunis."
The Pach/Back symbol is the Mackesy/D'Argenson lion. Moreover, the Steers were first in Surrey, which place I trace to Tyrus...symbolized by the mythical Taurus. Remember from yesterday that the Dan/Dannes Coat nearly matches the Surrey-surname Coat. And of course I'm thinking that Mackesy and Mackays were the Meshwesh/Mazyes/Maxyes. Hmm, both the Steer Coat and Crest are Crest is perpale, a strange heraldry term (also "per pale") indicating a separation line. I have not seen this term before, and yet I've seen countless separation lines, meaning that it could be insider-code for "purple."
To my great surprise, it begins to look as though the Pach and Pace surnames trace to Apachnas=Khyan. I showed in the last update page that the Scottish Turk Coat (I'm assuming they were from the Taurus-related Tuaregs/Touaregs) uses a "Pace" motto term, and that the Pace Coat uses a purple Shield. Ask whether the purple arm in the Dark/Dargen Crest relates to the Sark variation of the Surrey surname, for the Dark/Dargen surname was also "D'Arque," and that seems to link to the D'Argenson surname that comes up when entering "Mackesy." I might have rendered it a mistake on the part of houseofnames.com that the D'Argenson (also "Margeson") surname comes up when entering "Mackesy," if not for the same lion used by the Mackie/Mackey Coat.
Therefore, German Turks/Tuercks might just be using the Irish Macey/Mackay Shield. The Shield in the same colors is also used by the Zionist Payens/PAGENs/Paions, and so note that "Apachnas" could modify to "Pagen." The Picenti Illyrians>Italians also come to mind.
ZOWIE, after writing the last line above, I recalled the Pacenti term (which looks even more like "Apachnas") of the last update page, and going back to find what I had written on it, behold: "At the site of the Pacenti variation of the Italian Paces..."!!! I'm shocked; I wasn't even going to mention the possible Pace link to Khyan lest you think I was merely contriving. Now it looks rather solid.
The Fagan surname of Tyrone comes up when entering either "Pagen" or "Pachen," and it uses the same grails and Shield colors as the Argens. Haven't I been claiming all along, for months now, that Mascis/Masseys/Meschins link back to the Exodus Hyksos??? That's the last thing I personally want to hear...and believe. But that's what it looks like, and it underscores why I think God chose to give me birth, to make this revelation. I was born the color blue. I was almost dead. He must have said, "No wait. I'll use him to reveal Masci blood in the Hyksos. Let him live."
The Mackie/Mackey motto uses a single word, Labore. It could be code for the Cretan Labrys and/or Labyrinth (where the Minotaur was kept). The Scottish Ramsey motto uses "labora" and the Crest is a white unicorn, the symbol of the MACClesfield Crest. The unicorn was also the symbol of raven-depicted Shetland, and the Mackie/Mackey Coat uses ravens/crows!!
The English Ramseys/Rammes', from a http://www.houseofnames.com/xq/asp.fc/Origin.EN/sId.59F92375-B9CB-40C5-A457-C99F03C75C61/qx/ramsey-family-crest.htm location, use the English/Scottish Mackay/Macey Shield, and rams for symbols. The Scottish Turks use the same Shield in colors reversed, and a ram for a Crest. Some people think that Rameses was the Exodus pharaoh, and perhaps this branch of Hyksos-related Westerners decided to honor Rameses for that theory.
It may not be coincidental that it was last night when I ran across the likely identification of mythical king Minos of Crete. The writer of the piece below insists that the city's name always had "Hercules" attached to it, and keeping in mind that this "god" was the extension of the Hyksos-Samson cult:
"...two names were connected with two separate mythological legends in regard to [Heraclea Minoa's] origin. The first of these related that Heracles, having vanquished the local hero Eryx in a wrestling match, obtained thereby the right to the whole western portion of Sicily, which he expressly reserved for his descendants. He did not, however, found a town or settlement; but, somewhat later, Minos, king of Crete, having come to Sicily in pursuit of Daedalus, landed at the mouth of the river Halycus, and founded there a city, to which he gave the name of Minoa..."
Samson's father was "Manoah," wherefore, and I think it sits very well with me, the Minoans, who are not historical under that name but are called such only due to mythical Minos, were directly from the Samson cult. The Minoans used a bull as their major symbol, which is why they were given birth by the Zeus Taurus. The Labyrinth was a Minoan symbol. I'm keeping in mind that the suggestion above, that Hyko-Samson elements settled western Sicily. Remember, Meschin and Samson surnames share the same-colored scallops, symbols of "Sicily."
The Minoa/Manoah line should go to the Isle of Man(n). Hmm, the German Mann/Maener Coat looks like it uses a version of the Mackesy and Mackie lion but facing frontward. I wouldn't mention it unless the Steers also use it, because these Manns/Maeners were first found in Styria. I did trace the Manoah code of Samson to the Maeander river, and as I traced them to the wild mythical Maenads, could the wildman in the Mann/Maener Coat apply? It is the Massey Shield, and Masseys were from Macey of Manche, while peoples on the Isle of Man are called, Manx.
The Pegasus of the Massey Crest represents Medusa Gorgons, which I repeat here because the center in the Arms of Sicily (which is the Arms of the Isle of Man) is known to be a Medusa head. In myth, Pegasus came forth from the head of Medusa. Was PEGasus, therefore, symbol of Apachnas???
Manetho claimed that Hyksos ruled Egypt for 511 years, well beyond the 200 years of the big-six. He said that Hyksos made up the 16th dynasty, who ended up ruling Thebes and passing the throne to the 17th dynasty, which Manetho says was part-Hyksos, part indigenous Egyptian. He asserted that the Hyskos of Avaris, upon being ejected by the Thebans, built Jerusalem. We're keeping in mind here that the Hyksos god, Seth/Sutekh/Setan, was linked (by me) to Zion, and to "Zedek," two named of Amorite Jerusalem, and that "Khyan is roundly believed to be the Amorite name, "Hayan." Continuing from the Britannica article featured above:
"In 1847 E. de Rouge proved from a fragment of a story in the papyri of the British Museum, that Apopi was one of the latest of the Hyksos kings, corresponding to Aphobis; he was king of the 'pest' [I don't know what is meant by that]...and endeavoured to make the Egyptians worship his god Setekh or Seti...
...Meanwhile a headless statue of a king named Khyan, found at Bubastis, was attributed on various grounds to the Hyksos...while others were in favour of assigning them all to the Hyksos, whose appellation seemed to be recognizable in the title Hek-khos, 'ruler of the barbarians [Berbers?], borne by Khyan...From the remains of fortifications there he argues that the Hyksos were uncivilized desert [smacks of Tuaregs/Meshwesh of the Sahara]...that their hordes were centered in Syria, but were driven thence by a superior force in the East to take refuge in the [Greco] islands and became a sea-power--whence the strange description 'Hellenic' in Manetho...Besides the statue of Khyan, blocks of granite with the name of Apopi have been found in Upper Egypt at Gebelen and in Lower Egypt at Bubastis..."
Again, I am of the impression that Bubastis was the earlier Tanis on/off the Pelusiac.
The writer of the article found it difficult to believe that Hyksos were related to Greeks, when the reality is they became the Hellen- and Danaan-based Greeks. I trace mythical Hellen, father of Doris and Aeolus, to the Allen Sarmations...at Tanais. I think Manetho was correct in his link to Hellen, therefore, and I too think that Hyksos ruled parts of upper Egypt, especially Amarna...which I link to Hephaestus of Myrina-Amazon elements in Lemnos. I discovered last night that Hephaestus, whom I traced recently to Caphtorites/Philistines on Crete, was likely named after a Phaistos location on Crete, near Cretan Ida.
As for Apopi/Apophis/Apepi, the "usurper" of Khyan's kingdom, I think there's a story to tell of his roots in mythical Epaphus/Apis of Egypt, son of white-bull Zeus and white-cow Io, goddess of Argos. I recently identified the bull that led Cadmus (= the Tyrian Hyksos to Greece) to Grecian Thebes as symbol for the proto-Argives. I realized that Ino, daughter of Cadmus, was the same entity as mythical INAchus, founder of Argos. What this means is that Hyksos were related, or at least allied, to the Cadmus-branch Hyksos. Indeed, as the Cadmus wave was the extension of his "brother" Cilix=Cilicia, so the founders of Argos are traced back by others to Tarsus of Cilicia. We get it.
BUT MY POINT HERE IS, Apophis was of Argos, or even proto-Argos, elements. And that explains why Danaans built their first Greek city (Mycenae) on the edge of Argos.
Epaphus is one hard cat to follow, but he looks Avvite to me, as per the Abantians of Euboea. Note that he was also in Syria:
"[Epaphus] was born in Euboea (Herodotus, Strabo) or, according to others, in Egypt, on the river Nile, after the long wanderings of his mother. He was then concealed by the Curetes, by the request of Hera, but Io sought and afterward found him in Syria.
...With his wife, Memphis (or according to others, Cassiopeia), he had one daughter, Libya."
These complicated origins is Hyksos all over, from branches among the Nile delta to Libya to Syria to the Avvites to Cassiopeia's Joppa. Joppa = Apophis/Apopi? I think so. That would make the Roman Jupiter (not necessarily Zeus exactly), said by some to be from Joppa, a Hyksos god built on Apophis elements...i.e. the Egyptians who survived the Ten Plagues and did not die in the Biblical sea crossing. AND Juno, the wife of Jupiter, then looks like Io or Ino -- Argos elements -- though she could also be of Juvant elements i.e. Abantians.
Indeed, the Apis term means "bee" in Italy, and became the Ops cult of the Sabines!! That is, the Apophis Hyksos led to the Ops-cult Sabines, and Sabines are traced by me to "Daphne" elements, which goddess I independently identified as the myth-code carried by the Hyksos to Ladon>Latins and the Tubal side of the Romans.
Recalling the Tabar and Tavaris surnames of yesterday, let's not forget the Tiber river through Rome, or Tiberius caesar who ruled while Jesus was on earth.
I'm convinced: Romans were from Apophis, the one who took over the ailing kingdom of the Exodus pharaoh. And when Biblical prophecy has Romans versus Jesus in the end times, it's Hyksos versus Jesus, the Eleventh Plague! The eleventh king of Daniel 7 will become victim of the Eleventh Plague. Glory, glory hallelujah...
Remember, Perseus, Danaan founder of Mycenae, was placed at Joppa by at least one myth writer. I'm discussing an image of Mycenae, found online by Tim, that looks like the ark of the covenant. I'll share it with you when I feel the green light. We're still investigating, but so far Tim can't find a write-up on the image. The problem is, it tends to trace the Danaans to Israelites. However, as I suggested to Tim, proto-Mycenaeans may have stolen the ark when some of them lingered in Joppa and surrounding regions. Who more but the Hyksos would want to steal the ark?
This is an intriguing mystery, and perhaps no one but the devil himself would find ways to make the Hyksos branches appear as Israelites. Again, unless Israelites ruled Egypt for centuries before Moses appeared, and unless Israelites of that time worshiped Seth/Setan, the Hyksos "Abiru" were NOT Israelite Hebrews. The very idea that Israelites would found Europe, the prophetic domain of Satan, rubs hard against Biblical prophecy and Biblical concepts. The idea becomes even more absurd when known that Danaans were Gorgons.
Granted, there could have been some pagan Israelites among the Danaans, Romans, et al, but we see practically nothing in Greeks or Romans that align with the Mosaic covenant. Also, we could expect some intermarriages between Hyksos and Israelites in Egypt, especially during the early years when Israelites may not have been as-badly mistreated. But I wouldn't focus on Israelite blood when dealing with the roots of Rosicrucians, Freemasons, and Zionists.
I was fairly convinced that new British prime minister, David Cameron, is a Rothschild agent due (not only to Rothschild Arms used by Camerons) to his support of BP lately. I've been seeking evidence on whether Rothschilds are in favor with, or opposed to, the Palestinian state. My tendency has been to claim that mainline, Zionist Rothschilds -- the ones who founded Israel -- are at the forefront of the push to create a Palestinian state. At first, I figured that it was due to a compromise solution to spare Israel, but only for the purposes of sparing Rothschild business interests in Israel.
My new belief is that Rothschilds are from Philistine-Hyksos elements (Rhodian-Rosicrucian, not Roman) in the first place, and that they know it. I don't know how more Satanic it can be than to have Hyksos-derived "Jews" founding a modern Israel, and to stack it with Ashkenazi "Jews" from Khazar and Rus elements. But that appears to be the reality.
"Prime Minister David Cameron [today] urged Israel to lift its blockade of the Gaza Strip, slamming the current state of the Palestinian enclave as a 'prison camp.'
'Let me be clear that the situation in Gaza has to change... Gaza cannot and must not be allowed to remain a prison camp,' he said in a speech to a business association during a visit to Turkey."
This places Cameron in the same tent as Cathy Ashton (EU foreign minister). It is the belief of many that Rothschilds have become modern rulers of end-time Rome, and that they set up kings almost at will in various nations. Rothschilds are traced by Rothschild watchers to a Rosicrucian cult called, Golden Dawn, a phrase applying to Osiris/Horus elements of Egypt. Horus was the Hros-branch proto-Rus with Ares counterpart. The Egyptian Ra was likely the same as Ar/Ara>Ares. The all-seeing eye of the modern day is typically linked to Rothschild oversight of nations, but it traces to the "eye of Horus." Hyksos worshiped Horus, though the Horus and Seth cults were at war at least once.
By the way, the so-called "shepherd kings" that "Hyksos" is said to be defined as is not my leaning. The Hek-Khos variation (above quote) of "Heka-Khase" could indicate the Kos god of Edom. That's more my leaning. I don't think we should seek what "khase/khos" could mean in the Egyptian dictionary, for as we can see all over the place, kings called themselves after previous important "gods" or other personalities.
I don't know if it's coincidental on this day that I introduce Apachnas, but see the Apache-combat video on the WikiLeaks story as it grows.
If you're interested, the attack on Fallujah, which included general Mattis as one of the leaders, has reportedly caused a four-fold increase in cancer as well as other mutations in new births. It is suspected that a uranium element was used in at least one of the American weapons used.
Abbas of Palestine has misplaced his confidence in Obama. he felt that if he held out long enough from talks with Israel, Obama would impose a Palestinian state. But, now that O-lection season is upon us, and seeing that the West has gotten shaky knees, Obama is doing the right thing:
"U.S. President Barack Obama may not help set up a Palestinian state if PA President Mahmoud Abbas does not enter direct negotiations with Israel soon, according to a Palestinian document obtained by the Associated Press.
The news agency reported yesterday that the document contained a warning to that effect from a senior U.S. envoy."
So that's where we're at with that. If Abbas snubs the O-directive, kiss the peace process goodbye for the rest of 2010 at least. Cathy Ashton is in Palestine trying to get the process moving too. We are supposed to be entering Javier Solana's crunch time about now, where a Palestinian state should be imposed if no other remedy can be found. We shall have to see how strong Ashton's knees are.
BP's HAYward is leaving BP for a Russian oil company (TNK-BP) half-owned by BP. It's interesting because "Hay" evokes the Hayk god at the root of the Hyksos, and also "Khyan," and meanwhile I've been expecting a Russian to enter north Iraq seeking its black gold. That's one of the theories, anyway.
The other theory is that the Rothschilds would put out the anti-Christ in northern Iraq. The suspicion is that Hayward is a Rothschild pawn because BP is owned by Rothschilds. To now get a BP-Russia mix, that could be something. BP is now drilling off the coast of Libya, and BP is already in Iraq. Story below:
And HEY, TNK-BP has been studying the Iraqi landscape for good oils deals. In an article of this past May:
"TNK-BP Holding and Iraq Oil Company for Oil Investments (IOCOI) have signed an agreement to establish a joint venture aimed at identifying potential projects to acquire, develop and operate oil and gas fields on the territory of Iraq."
There's no word about northern Iraq in the article, but that's of obvious concern. And HEY, do you think the gulf of Mexico disaster was caused by a planned explosion from Russian agents, seeing now that Hayward is going to Russia?
For your information:
"TNK-BP announced today [October 13, 2009] that the company is considering possibilities of developing hydrocarbon resources in Iraq. We intend to do so by working with the Iraqi Ministry of Oil in accordance with all applicable laws and procedures.
TNK-BP does not have current projects, activities or operations in Iraq, including the Kurdish region. To date, TNK-BP has not signed any exploration and production contracts with the Iraqi government (including the Kurdish region).
TNK-BP is interested in working in Iraqi upstream to the mutual benefit and in close cooperation with the central government of Iraq.""
Why the mention of Kirkuk???
Earlier still, in 2007: "BP and TNK-BP today announced that they have signed a memorandum of understanding to create a strategic alliance with the Russian [state-owned] gas giant, Gazprom, to invest jointly in major long-term energy projects or swap assets around the world."
To get a grasp of how pathetic oil companies are, this relatively small one racks in almost 2 billion dollars in three months: "TNK-BP 2009 first quarter net profits fell 58% due to oil price decline to $747 million from $1.77 billion a year ago." If that's not stealing the peoples' money...
The current CEO of TNK-BP, who is being replaced by Hayward, is of a Dudley surname. The Dudley Coat, because it is English like the Massin/Mason Coat, must be linked to the latter because both use exactly the same Coat! The Massins/Masons were first found in Thanet, a Danet/Danaan-like term, I suppose.
Entering "Danet" brings up the Danon surname with red roses on white, not only the Rhodes symbol (Danaans were in Rhodes), but smacking of the Turkel/Turgil Coat...and may link to the red roses of the Italian Mazza/Mazzi Coat (since I expect them to be from Tuareg-related Meshwesh/Mazyes).
Note that the diagonal black-on-white bar of the Mazzis is used also by the Hayward Coat. The French (Normandy) Hay/LaHay Coat uses the same black-on-white diagonal bar(s), in the same direction. The write-up on the Scottish Hayes tells that they were related to the Norman (Coutances) Hayes, and used the three red shields on white as their very-ancient arms.
Last night I searched for the quote below and found it in this chapter mentioning mythical Aphareus many times. Isdidn't know it in 2006 (when I wrote the chapter) that "he" was a representation of Hyksos out of Avaris.
The quote below is huge for showing that Egyptologists are lying to us, stretching human history as far back as possible. I've read that all ancient history is timed based on the timing of Egyptian chronology, which starts roughly at the historical king Menes, whom I would place at roughly 2000 BC or later. This is what I wrote:
King Menes [first king] of Egypt is timed by secular "experts" as early bas 3200ish BC; the lists begin at that time with Narmer, father of Menes. It is obvious, however, that Egyptian king lists have much repetition, and there's no doubt in my mind that "experts" know it but disregard their own dishonesty. When I spent merely an hour seeking some repetition, I found it! Depending on who is giving the data, much of it based on Manetho, the first dynasty list is roughly as follows:
"Menes, Djer, Athothis, Teti/Ati, Djet, Merbapen, Semerkhet...(and later) Sneferka."
These kings are the same as those below, listed (by Britannica) for the end of the fifth dynasty and start of the sixth (approx. 2400-2200 BC according to Britannica):
"Menkauhor, Djedkare, Isesi, Unas, Teti, Userkare (Phiops), Pepe I Meryre...(and later) Neferkare" (Britannica "Egypt" 1970).
It's common knowledge that Menes (Manetho's term) was also called "Aha," wherefore it is easy to see that Menkauhor is a Menes-(K)Aha combination.
Djer easily modifies to Djedkare.
Athothis of the first easily equates with Isesi of the fifth.
Sometimes Djer of the first is viewed as Uenephes (see website below), which easily modifies to "Unas" of the fifth.
And Merbapen, when flipped to "Bapin-Mer," easily becomes "Pepi Meryre." Manetho called this king, "Neibais," smacking of Nibhaz, the Avvite dog god.
A few generations later, Sneferka is named as a first-dynasty possibility, who must have been the same as Neferkare of the sixth dynasty.
I can't help but pity the impoverished historians who made that blunder. The serious question is, how many other kings have been repeated twice, or even three times, by our worshipful Egyptologists?
There are so many variations for the names of rulers that one could disguise one man as three or four, even five.
The article above has an interesting entry of Memphis, the location that the Hyksos started out at: "This town (or actually a shrine within it) had the indigenous name 'Hiku-Ptah' which later was corrupted by foreigners to 'Egypt'. The Hiku portion could mean that Egypt, and Caphtor, were named after Hyksos. That makes a lot of sense for explaining why I've just found Hyksos to be Philistines fundamentally. And the Ptah portion, because he was a craftsman god, explains why I've linked Hephaestus/Hephaistos to Caphtor and Caphtorites. I'm going to keep this in mind, that the writer of Genesis identified the Hyksos as Caphtorites that became Canaanized in Egypt.
The land of Egypt was not named such in the Hamite beginning, but was instead Mizraim. The possibility that Egypt was named by Hyksos would tend to identify Aegyptus, brother of Danaus, as sheer Hyksos. This idea, found this morning, plays heavily into what I prepared for you last night, starting in the next quote from my 2006 chapter:
Aphareus gave birth to Lynceus, and while there are two such names in mythology, I would view them as the same peoples but at two different times/situations. The Lynceus that is not technically the son of Aphareus was the son of Aegyptus, meaning that Aegyptus and Aphareus can be equated, serving also to reveal that Aphareus became a Greek peoples in one branch and in another the Aryan rulers of Egypt...the same rulers roughly as depicted by Io, Inachus' "daughter."
How did I miss it? Aphareus depicted the stock of peoples who named Avaris. IN FACT, Gorgophone --Perseus' daughter out of Joppa -- was made the mother of Aphareus! Persians, apparently, allies of Gog.
Aphareus proper represented the Avaris Hyksos on their way to Greece. And the fact that Hyksos were associated with Mitanni (Wikipedia says that Hyksos hired Mitanni mercenaries) explains why I traced Aegyptus to Methoni of Messene. BUT, I can now also trace Hyksos of Avaris to certain Ligurian-based Gauls:
When Danaus arrived to Argos, he is said to have expelled Gelanor [Lynceus later killed Danaus and took the Argos throne]..
"Lynceus" may have become the Lingones of Gaul, who are said to have become the Lugii. Lynceus was the son of Aphareus, I remind you, and Aphareus' brother was made, "Leucippus"; ignoring the horse suffix, we are left with Leuci, the name of an historical peoples exactly, smack to the north of the Lingones! Both Aphareus and Leucippus were sons of Gorgophone so that indeed: 1) Gauls were Gorgons, and, 2) Gelanor depicted Gauls.
What I didn't realize then was: Hyksos from Tanis struggled for the Argos throne with Hyksos from Aegyptus>Lynceus>Avaris.
I would suggest that Gelanor of Argos, whom I have linked in the past with mythical Hellen, was Manetho's "Hellenic" ingredient to which he attached the Hyksos. "Lyn(ceus)" might itself have been rooted in the Alans (an Aryan peoples from Caucasia).
That 2006 chapter was my first inkling that Greeks were from pre-Israel. I cut it in half last night due to off-topic/confusing info. It focuses on Perseus' family out of Joppa, which family included a Proteus character thought by Robert Graves (leading myth analyzer) to be the father of Perseus. I identified "Proteus" as Pro-Zeus because Zeus was likewise made the father of Perseus:
..."Acrisius" I would then suspect to be Ekron, one of five cities (south of Joppa) in which the Bible says were left to the Avvites when Joshua conquered Israel (Joshua 13:3). The deduction thus far in this reasoning is that the Avvites were from the (historical) Apharsites. Keep in mind that ProZeus was made the twin of Acrisius...
While Zeus was made the husband of Danae, Acrisius was assigned the same Danae for a daughter, which could suggest a Danaan birth in Ekron, or even mount Acra in Jerusalem.
Re-reading the chapter last night made me realize that Acra and/or Ekron was, possibly, Achiroe too, the mother of Danaus! AND, the city of Avaris appears rooted in Israel's enemies into its exile period, the Biblical (Ezra 4:9) Apharsites...whom I and others identify with Avars. However, Apharsites may have been Persians instead, as "Perseus" would imply.
Here's another quote from the chapter that mentions Hyksos in two ways that I didn't realize at the time:
It can't be a coincidence that Nereus had 50 children, as had Danaus, as had Aegyptus, as had Caucon (probably same as "Kikon"). This number 50, I think, is code for the Hecatonchire ("100 hands"), which in turn (in my opinion) is code for a Gogi peoples. One (of only three) Cyclopes (monsters virtually the same as Hecatonchire) was "Arges."...One Hecatonchire (there were only three) was named "Gyges," and another "Cottus..."
The Hecaton term must surely have been used in secret code for the Heka=Hyksos. Cottus was probably the same as Cotys, son of Manes and grandfather of Lydus=Lydia. We easily see, therefore, that Hyksos trace to Gyges of Lydia and Ogyges of Acte/Attica, and one can then conclude that Biblical Gog was a Hyksos peoples. The Ladon dragon, as per his depiction of Lydians in western Atlantis, was given 100 heads.
More bad news from Iraq: the parliament has once again postponed. Most parliamentarians didn't even show: "Mohamed al-Mashkour, from the Shiite-led National Iraqi Alliance, said that there were not enough members present for constituting a quorum...No date has been set for the next session of Parliament." Also today:
"Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki and US military chief Admiral Mike Mullen have discussed the political stalemate in Iraq...
Al-Maliki told Mullen during a meeting late [yesterday] that 'regional interference' was preventing the formation of a new government, according to the statement released by al-Maliki's office."
That's about all the article says. Apparently, politicians on Maliki's side are disgruntled with Iran's hand in Iraq, seeking to replace him. Maliki is blaming the postponement on Iran, in other words, when in the reality of others the postponement is due to Maliki's failure to step down. Apparently, Maliki, who complained of American interference previously, is now seeking American help with his too-hot, Iran-interference situation. The Americans can now enter the political mud ring by invitation of Maliki himself. And of course the Americans will advise him to settle with Allawi's party rather than with the pro-Iran Shi'ites.
The Persia axis might be quiet at this time in the terror department because it sees hope of taking Iraq politically. Can we imagine political intrigues at this time, seeking to take the throne? Yes, but, er, where's Gog?
The headline today: TNK-BP profits soar as Hayward awaits Russian exile. Also, Robert Dudley, the outgoing CEO of TNK-BP, is to replace Hayward at BP on October 1. Remember, as per yesterday, the Dudleys are linked to the Massins/Masons.
If you've come to this book beginning at this webpage,
see the rest of the Gog-Iraq story in PART 2, accessed from the
Table of Contents