Written June 2006, later than upcoming chapters, due to a new Hebrew theme

Let me tell you a story about the way things went for me recently (2005/6). For various reasons my computer was unable to get online, and eventually the machine crashed altogether due to a critical software problem that wouldn't allow me to make a recovery of the system. The repairman wanted $45 per hour to come in and fix it, with no guarantee that he could.

I had decided to spend about a month clearing brush in my forest, and while awaiting a friend from Canada to visit me, I sensed the Spirit telling me to stop working in the forest, but not knowing that it was the Spirit, I continued anyway, until on the 5th day I caught a large and terrible case of poison oak. This reminded me of a situation a few weeks earlier when I sensed my spirit telling me to shave because someone was about to pop in unexpectedly (I hadn't shaved for five days). I did not listen to that small voice because I didn't know it was the Spirit, until five minutes later when someone popped in on me unexpectedly.

The next day my friend arrived, the purpose of which was not in our minds to fix my computer, but he being computer smart fixed the problems (it took him two full days). I started taking all of this to mean that I was to get back online to finish my research on the dragon bloodline. After my friend left, I was still scratching my skin off (painfully) due to the poison oak, and so I got cracking on the research rather than continuing the forest clean up. Within a couple of days, I latched onto the Abrahamic Asshurites (Genesis 25), whom I had never before acknowledged although I had read Genesis many times, and I began to sense in my spirit that these peoples were part of that Germanic bloodline that was sacred to the secret societies under the Rosicrucian banner. On the other hand, I thought the idea to be a little fantastic, and began to conclude that my imagination was simply running away on me.

By the third day of research, I had found some convincing evidence, and on the fourth day I found what seemed to me the "Holy Grail" that no one is supposed to discover. It was merely this, that Abraham's brother, Nahor, had a son named Buz (Genesis 25:21). What had me elated was that, in my previous years of research, I had traced the dragon bloodline to a Bias/Byzas peoples of Greek myth, a peoples that I thought furnished the Merovingian (French) kings, the Stewarts that sat on the British throne, and who knows who else of secret-society importance.

I had already published these findings (see "Buzi as a Bee" and "Bias Will Be Boiis"), and I felt that readers would not be overwhelmingly convinced that I had found something of a key in breaking the roots of Rosicrucian secret societies wide open...which had been my very task, though not knowing the full value when I started back in 2002. Now that the Da Vinci code has sold 40 million books, etc., I can see why it's important to God to expose Da Vinci and friends as the real con artists whose purpose it has always been to destroy Faith in Christ.

On the day that I had gone through the motions of a victory dance in my kitchen, delighted because I felt that finally I was nearing the end of this arduous research project (that made my spirit sick at times), and because I felt that I had not wasted my time after all, I went to my garden to pull weeds for the purpose of thinking over the importance of Buz, son of Nahor. After being in the garden just a few minutes, I sensed in my spirit that I should stop pulling weeds and continue the writing project instead, but I didn't go in immediately because I didn't know then that it was the Spirit (I typically let the Spirit down like this, and I have prayed repeatedly that He speak louder, with a voice I can differentiate from my own conscience).

Just five minutes later, a bumble bee came close, and I waved my hand to get it away, but it came a second time, and I waved my hand a second time, but it came third time more determined, at which point I let it know I meant murderous business if it didn't get lost. As it flew away I watched it, and as I watched one of the largest bees I had ever seen, the bee became super-focused in my mind, at which moment I realized that this little event was sent by God to assure me to include Buz, son of Nahor, in my research. For the Bias/Byzas-line peoples I had identified, a year or two earlier, used bees and honey to symbolize themselves (for example, the primordial Merovingian king, father of Clovis, had gold bees buried with him). So here I am on the sixth day, writing to you this story; where the research will lead I do not yet know, but I have a good reason to believe that Buz, son of Nahor, became the bee-people Greeks (i.e. the goddess Melia, and Merope/Merops), the Merovingian Franks (note how "Merop" evokes the king, "Merovi"), and that this is why a Hebrew/Millennial element is found woven into the fabric of Rosicrucianism.

A couple of days after the bee incident, I received an email from a part-Hebrew Christian person who had been a member of the Illuminati-related Rosicrucian organization, AMORC. Although we had been engaged daily on my topic of the Buzi and the Bute family of royal-Stewart importance, it wasn't until a week later that I realized, after glossing over the emailer's surname several times, that it started with, and had as its root, "Bot." This correspondence with a Bot---- surname just seemed too non-coincidental. I was told that this name was Hungarian, and I know that Hungarians descend from Magyars and Kabars, the latter definitely having Hebrew elements and related to the Hebrew-ruled Khazars (north-east Caucasia). The Khazars are thought by many to be somehow connected to Rosicrucians/Templars.

Long before the Magyars came to Hungary, proto-Hungary was inhabited by Bessi Thracians that I suspected were rooted in Buzi Medes. I had already figured that the Buda portion of Buda-Pest (twin-city capital of Hungary) was founded either by the Budii or Buzi Medes. I've yet to find whether these two similar names were the same stalk of peoples, but it seems feasible.

Previously, correspondence with another Christian, of the Stewart bloodline (and who suggested that her husband had been murdered by Illuminati agents), had inadvertently led me to the Bute surname of Stewart importance. Upon my developing a Stewart-Bute connection to the Greek god, Butes, I emphasized it as the name to trace across Europe, and Buda of Hungary was in my mind good clue in tracing this bloodline.

Ezekiel 38:13 tells that Sheba and Dedan will wonder why Gog has come to Israel, and ask whether or not it's to take a spoil of war there. The mention of these brother-peoples seems pregnant with the purpose of revealing the route of Gog at that time. The problem is, there are two men in the Bible each of whom named two of his sons, Sheba and Dedan, and this has so created a controversy among historians that I sometimes wonder if God didn't want certain truths to remain unknowable.

While one pair of Sheba-and-Dedan brothers are widely thought to have formed people groups in Saudi Arabia, the other pair of brothers formed uncertain peoples to the north of Israel. The latter pair were sons of Abraham's son, Jokshan (Genesis 25:3), and I have some reasons to believe that these, too, are tied to the blood roots of secret societies.

Genesis 25:3 tells that the Dedanites of Abrahamic blood formed the Asshurites, revealing that a certain descendant of the Dedanites was named "Asshur.". While these Asshurites must be distinguished from those who had earlier named the city of Asshur/Ashur (after which the Assyrians are said to be named), it comes to me with revelatory importance that a Dedanite descendant should furnish his son with a name that honored the capital city of Assyria. It tends to verify what some already believe, that Assyria was a Semite kingdom. It would therefore be likely that Assyria, prior to the formation of Israelites, was filled with Hebrews.

In Ezekiel 27, both sets of Sheba-and-Dedan brothers are mentioned as traders with Tyre. The mention of Dedan in verse 20 is followed by mention of Arabia (v 21), and then by Sheba and his father Raamah in verse 22. Then, in verse 23, Sheba is mentioned again, but this time he is not likely the son of Raamah, for immediately after the mention of this Sheba there is the mention of Asshur, in which case I am confident that this Sheba-and-Asshur couplet are descendants of Abraham.

As the Muslims consider themselves holy for being descended from Abraham, so also the Asshurites may have viewed themselves, so as to start a cult around the fact. With subsequent generations and predictable rejection from the YHWH-honoring Israelites, the cult may have devolved into the Rosicrucian/Kabala secret society, and perhaps certain descendants of Nahor joined that cult. Both the Asshurites and Buzites were in truth Hebrews, for Abraham's father was a descendant of Eber (Genesis 11:16-26).

Sheba and Asshur are mentioned alongside Haran, Canneh, Eden, Chilmad, and Tarshish (still in Ezekiel 27), and this reveals the general location of the Abrahamic brothers. The location of Haran is in modern southeast Turkey a few tens of miles from the Euphrates river. Abraham's family lived in Haran for a time before migrating to Israel. Abraham's brother, Haran, was apparently named after that city, even though Haran lived and died in Ur. This is the first clue that Hebrews in Ur were connected to Hebrews in Haran, what may be extremely important in identifying the historical peoples that they were, perhaps even tied to the dragon bloodline.

The question then becomes, did God make the Abrahamic Asshurites into a great nation (i.e. since he promised Abraham to make his seed into many great nations)? When the Assyrians, over a thousand years after Abraham, were sent by God to take the 10 tribes of Israel away into exile, were the invaders in large part descended from the Abrahamic Asshurites? How deep into Assyria had the latter penetrated, if at all? I realize that I'm starting to sound like a proponent of British-Israelism here, and to my own surprise I find myself going down a similar trail no matter how I try to avoid their writings. I Asshur you, I am not attempting to promote their view, nor anyone else's, but am seeking the realities as I alone see them.

While many proponents of British-Israelism, for example the late Herbert Armstrong of Plain-Truth-Magazine fame, have taught that Germans descend from Assyrians, and that many of the those Assyrian-come-Germans were Hebrews of the lost ten tribes, who became certain European nations/kingdoms, including Britain, I am beginning to see quite differently, that many European nations, especially the Germanics (and including the British), stem from Abrahamic Sheba and Dedan, and Nahorites, not (in particular, anyway) the Israelites that went to exile in Assyria. It’s extremely important for British-Israelists to recognize that the non-Israelite Hebrews put forth the seeds of European peoples long before the Assyrian exile of Israelites. Moreover, the Hebrew-based Europeans were also of Aryan blood, and it is one of my tasks in this book to discover which Aryans they had mixed with in Mesopotamia.

Long before I had even known that there was a people of Abraham called the Asshurites, I had spent years researching and writing 25 chapters of this book. Independent of the lines of thought that belong to anyone else, I traced the Germanics back to Armenia, and believing that they were connected to the sun god of Sumer and Akkadia, I yet avoided tracing the Armenians to that sun-god cult via the Assyrians. Why? Because the Armenians were an Aryan-speaking peoples (the politically-correct term is "Indo-European"), which connects them to Japheth (son of Noah). Armenians themselves claim to be from Togarmah, son of Gomer, son of Japheth. I resisted to include any Hebrew elements in with the Armenians, until I should find satisfactory evidence for that mix of blood.

I ignore those (including British-Israeli proponents) who view the Assyrians as stemming from Shem simply because he had a son by the name of "Ashshur." That's jumping to conclusions, for in no way does the Bible make this Ashshur the progenitor of Assyria. Granted, there are two ways that Genesis 10:11 can be, and are, translated: 1) "From that land he [Nimrod] went forth to Ashshur and built Nineveh..."; or, 2) "From that land, Ashshur went forth and built Nineveh..." My Hebrew interlinear (by Jay P. Green, Sr.) uses 1) above, and that translation seems correct because no man by the name of Ashshur is mentioned thus far in the Genesis text. A man by that name, he being the said son of Shem, is mentioned later, in verse 22.

It’s possible, since Genesis was written long after Nimrod, that Nimrod did not found the city of Asshur by that name; the human author of Genesis used that name because that’s what it was in his day. It's of course possible that the city was founded by Ashshur, son of Shem, and it's interesting that, throughout the Hebrew Bible, Assyria the nation/empire is referred to by exactly the same spelling: "Ashshur." But it’s also possible that Assyria was named after Asshur, son of Abraham, and I intend to look into that possibility and report my findings to you.

Assyrians virtually disappear from historical records for many centuries, and when they re-emerge as the Assyrian empire that brought Israel into exile, they may not have been Hamites any longer, at least not the majority. It is predictable that they would have mixed with Aryan elements in Caucusus and/or Mede regions, and moreover there seems to have been significant Semite blood on both the west and south sides of Assyria (i.e. so why not also in it?).

Is it possible that Scandinavians and other Germanic tribes -- because they claimed to be of the "Aesir" gods/bloodline -- descend from the Abrahamic Asshurites? Did a secret cult of Asshurites become so large and powerful as to contribute to much of Europe?

Was the mythical Asgard, depicted with a tree of life as per the Garden of Eden -- which Garden is moreover implied in the Scandinavian phrase, "Golden Apples of Idun" -- a nation of the Abrahamic Asshurites? How else could the Aesir Scandinavians have come to use the Garden of Eden as the bedrock of their pagan religion? Pagans are defined as those who abandon Biblical concepts, who instead worship their ancestors.

It's even more interesting that the pre-tribulation rapture was invented by a cult (Catholic Apostolic Church) that held with wild abandon to European-Israelism. It's fine to theorize that many Europeans stem from Hebrew stock, but to attempt to make Europe a twelve-tribe Theocracy in the name of Biblical Israel, as the Catholic Apostolic Church attempted, is Christian lunacy. To their dying days, the twelve apostles of that cult (one for the United States as well) awaited the return of Jesus to rule Israelite Europe as per the Biblical Millennium. Imagine that. I am certain that it was an Illuminati cult of the highest order, unbeknown to its naive membership, of course.

Most often, European-Israelism (rejected by mainline Christianity) includes the notion that the Israelite tribe of Dan moved from Greece into the Danube river and then to Denmark, etc., all the while spreading Dan-blood throughout Europe (e.g. to become the Germanic tribes). However, when I noticed the similarity between "Dan" and "Dedan" I immediately pondered whether secret societies, in teaching their Freemason pawns their secrets, have substituted Dan for Dedan in order to have them unwittingly teach a non-truth, in order to deflect the reality from the masses? My feelers tell me that it’s of prime importance to the secret societies to convince us that they are from Israelites and Levites, and should historians discover that in fact the European “Jews” are from the non-Israelite, non-Levite blood of Chaldea, the hopes of the secret societies will be dashed for producing their counterfeit Millennium in the name of Israel and/or Jesus.

We must distinguish between Freemasons at large, and those who rule the Freemasonic institutions, for Freemasons are simply the lowly pawns knowing not what they are doing on behalf of their masters. Only if they show anti-Christian qualities enough may they be taken from the religious sea into higher circles where the true political agenda becomes known. As always, world rule.

One can see how a peoples would like to promote themselves as the Chosen People just for being descended from Abraham. But I say none of all this to say that the descendants of Keturah (Abraham's wife) were Israelites just because they were Abraham's descendants, for Israelites stem from his son, Isaac, not from Keturah's children. However, both Abraham and Nahor were Hebrews since both were descended from Eber, thus making Hebrews out of both the Asshurites and Buzites.

In that the Buzites from Nahor are distinct from the Asshurites from Abraham, it implies the formation of two cults, one the Buzi Germanics (Merovingians included), and the other the Aesir Germanics (Swedes included). Obviously, making such a wild claim as this is a hollow bucket without some evidence. The first order of business is to discount the common idea that Sheba and Dedan are found only in Arabia, for Arabia is not part of the dragon bloodline leading from Armenia to the Germanics.

I have already mentioned Haran, that this city was mentioned alongside Sheba and Asshur (Ezekiel 27) to show that the pair were to the north of Israel, not in Arabia. Haran was smack between Syria and Assyria, far from Arabia. Along with Haran, Chilmad is also mentioned, and this term may be the same as Kulmadara, a city in Syrian Unqi (i.e. in northwest Syria). Canneh is also mentioned, which may be a city named after the Canaanites (Cana of Galilee?). Tarshish is not only mentioned in this Ezekiel list, but it's also side by side with Sheba and Dedan in Ezekiel 38, reinforcing in my mind that this latter mention (important to end-time prophecy concerning Gog) refers to the Abrahamic pair, for Tarshish is known to refer to Tarsus of ancient Cilicia, now in southern Turkey on the Mediterranean (see map of the Middle East. Click arrow-icon to enlarge).

One informative article on the Kittim has this to say: "During the Second Temple period, naming Syria as Asshur is a well known fact..."

As the Assyrian empire had disappeared by the second Temple period, and seeing that the Abrahamic Asshurites are listed in Ezekiel 27 with peoples in and around Syria, one may entertain the possibility that Syria had been commonly called "Asshur" due to the Abrahamic Asshurites. On the other hand, Syrian Asshur may have been from the stalk of Asshur, son of Shem. In fact, Syria was at first known as Aram, and this title is overwhelmingly thought to derive from Aram, son of Shem (Genesis 10:22). It's true that Nahor's grandson was named, "Aram," but by the time of his birth, there were already a people called "Arameans."

The importance of Nahor in God's plan is underscored where He sent Isaac to obtain his wife from Nahor's bosom, far away in Haran. She was Rebekah, daughter of Bethuel, son of Nahor (Genesis 22:23). Bethuel is said to be an Aramean, but as the Aram of Nahor blood was not likely an adult as yet, Bethuel must have been from the loins of Aram, son of Shem (you can see here that God is keeping the Israelite bloodline fully Semitic). As Nahor was descended from Eber, how did Aramean blood find it's way to his son, Bethuel? The only two choices are that the Aramean blood was in Milcah (Nahor's wife) or in Nahor's mother. When I read Deuteronomy 26:5, where the Israelites are said by God to have Arameans as their "father," I would conclude that Nahor's mother was the one with Aramean blood, for she also bore Abraham (who became the Israelites to which Deuteronomy 26:5 speaks).

The point here is to reinforce the location in which Nahor lived, not in Arabia, nor even in the face of Arabia, but in the face of Syria. In fact, and few would contest it, the Genesis account pegs him as living in Haran, or at least nearby. And that's the general vicinity in which I would expect the Buzites, and other family groups from Nahor, to have started out. I had already made a tentative tie between the Greek bee peoples (“Buzas/Byzas”) and the Buzi tribe of Medes, but now I want to know if the Buzi Medes were not named after Buzites from Nahor. If Buzites moved into Iran/Medea to thereby become the Buzi Mede tribe, then it could easily explain why Rosicrucians/Kabalists were fond of the magic craft, for the Medes were by and large wizards. One other pertinent question is, did the Bute(s) name derive from “Bethuel”? The gravitation of the Abrahamic Asshurites into Syria (i.e. so as to account for Syria's being called "Asshur") becomes a promising theory, for kin tend to seek out kin when moving about (e.g. as refugees of war). That is, the Asshurites went to live with their Aramean kin.

Arameans worshipped Sumerian gods, including Ishtar, and so they, even though they were descendants of Shem, were by no means on God's good side. There is a scripture (Joshua 24:2) implying Nahor's worshiping of other gods as Laban (Nahor's grandson) did, but it seems that God chose his bloodline in spite of it. Indeed, for he also sent Jacob to find a wife from Nahor's seed, this time from the two daughters of Laban! And Laban was, like Rebekah, the son of Bethuel the Aramean, so that Laban is likewise called an Aramean (Genesis 25:20).

It’s possible that Sumeria was named after Shem (Aram’s father) himself. It’s then feasible that the dragon sun god, Ishtar's husband, Dumuzi/Tammuz, was of the Shem bloodline, for Tammuz was an extension of the Sumerian sun gods, Enki and Utu. Abraham's family was from Ur, which was just a hop from Erech/Uruk, the hometown of Tammuz. Utu (Ishtar’s brother) and Enki were from the city of Eridu virtually on the outskirts of Ur (see map of the Middle East). Note that a pertinent region in Syria was called, "Unqi," almost the same as "Enki."

Terms sacred to Enki and Eridu keep coming up all the way to Greece, and in fact I have tentatively tied the Redones of France (called "Aereda") to Eridu. The Redones were Gauls, and it is common knowledge that Gaul religion ties back to Greece, which in turn is known to tie back to Sumeria. It is thought that the Merovingians were tied closely to the Redones.

It's interesting that I had already pegged the Edones of Thrace as playing a significant role in the Redone dragon line. It is a commonly known fact that Zeus was connected to Mount Ida of Crete, and that there was another sacred mountain called by the same name, near the foot of which Troy was built. Not only does "Ida" look as though it may be related to the root of "Edone," but ancient "Bit-Adini", known also as "Beth Eden," was an Aramean country very near Haran, and may have included Haran. The earlier name of Beth Eden had been "Ashtata," in memory of Ishtar ("Ashtarte" in Syria), I presume, and this connects Beth Eden to Ishtar’s family roots in Eridu, the latter being very near where the Garden of Eden was thought to be (at the confluence of the Euphrates and Tigris rivers). I hope you're getting my point, that the dragon cult was an Eden cult.

And so where Ezekiel 27 lists several Syrian localities/peoples that lived alongside the Abrahamic Sheba and Dedan, "Eden" was one of them, for which reason I would point the finger to Beth Eden in identifying it. . One may ask if “Dedan” doesn't mean “of Eden.”

Although the early people off the south shores of the Black sea were Hatti and Meshech, the Greeks in later times viewed the Black-sea coast as inhabited by "White Syrians." One can only see in this phrase a distinction being made between the darker Syrians nearer to Phoenicia and Israel. That is, the White Syrians were an inter-marriage between the Semite Syrians and certain sons of Japheth that lived near them, especially the Meshech (the major power in the region). The Meshech made up the major part of the Phrygian fold, and while Phrygians are by and large thought to have been descended from the Thracians/Trojans, Scandinavians can be traced to Phrygians (e.g. Odin's wife, "Frigg").

In the controversial Book of Jasher (which I and many others feel is a fake version of the Biblical Book of Jasher), it reads: "And the sons of Meshech were Dedon, Zaron and Shebashni." One can hardly fail to see the Sheba and Dedan in those sons. And of course these were not the Arabian Sheba and Dedan.

The Book of Jasher also claims to know the sons of Tubal, Magog, and Madai, even though these sons are not listed in the Bible. My opinion is that the writer(s) (probably Kabbalists) of the fake book chose names for those sons that reflected people groups. In other words, the writer(s) viewed the Meshech nation as consisting of peoples from Sheba and Dedan, and therefore created the names, "Dedon and "Shebashni," to act as the sons of Meshech.

Job was born in Uz, and there is an Uz who just happens to be the first son of Nahor, the elder brother of Buz. However, there was another Uz, son of Aram. When Satan came to destroy Job's family, it was at the hands of the Sabeans that the first strike came. There is difference of opinion as to who these Sabeans were, some identifying them as the Arabian Sheba/Seba. But because the Buzites (also mentioned in Job) are located by most to the north of Israel, and also due to Uz being identified as Damascus, others do not think that the Sabeans of Arabia are in view here. It is possible, therefore, that these Sabeans were of Abrahamic Sheba.

Behold this online statement: "...but the reference in the following verse to the 'merchants of Sheba,' together with Haran, Canneh, Eden Asshur, and Chilmad, who by implication would be Asiatics, is probably a mere dittography, and is rightly omitted in the Septuagint."

Unbelievable. This controversy was (and still is) so divisive that those who chose to view the Sabeans as the Arabian Sheba, including the Septuagint writers, just ignore that a second Sheba (verse 27) is included in the Ezekiel list, where it is situated beside “Asshur” and a list of other Asian/Syrian peoples. The core of the controversy concerns the Queen of Sheba, she being a symbol of honor to whatever country she belongs, and of course there are those who wish to view her as being from Arabian Sheba, and those who wish to view her as from Ethiopian Seba (son of Cush), and those who wish to view her as from Abrahamic Sheba.

Uz has been located by some (for various reasons that I won't get into here) in Edom, or in the face of Edom, much closer to Arabia. This view better allows the Sabeans of the Job text to be those of Arabia. But as Uz was the son of Aram, the latter being the father of what was later Syria, that southern positioning is unlikely. Moreover, one of Job's friends was a "Shuchiy" (i.e. "Shuhite"), and Strong's dictionary says that this term is from "Shuwach," the very same spelling as a son of Abraham by Keturah. This Shuwach (or "Shuah") was the uncle of the Abrahamic Sheba-and-Dedan brothers.

It has been suggested by some, and I am in agreement, that the land of Uz spread from Damascus to Edom, the land that belonged collectively to Ammon, Moab and Edom (see map of Israel). Lamentations 4:21 places Edom in the land of Uz, but not the other way around. Put it this way, that peoples in and near Damascus have throughout history considered the city to have been the home of Job. That may not turn out to be true, but it certainly exposes the weight of that opinion.

Josephus claimed that Damascus was founded by Uz, son of Aram. It throttled me to find (on day seven of this new Hebrew-Aryan theory) that, in the same sentence, Josephus claimed Armenia as founded by Hul/Ul, Uz's brother. Might Damascus have been founded by the other Uz, the brother of Buz? Even if not, I can still make the point that Nahor's first son was named Uz in honor of Uz, son of Aram.

Now Sevan was a region in Armenia (Lake Sevan is still in Armenia), and because a "b" commonly modifies to a "v" (e.g. Negev/Negeb, Tuval/Tubal), "Sheba" is expected to modify to "Sheva/Seva" and other similar terms. Having already connected the Sevan region with the Swedes over a year ago, since the Swedes were known as "Svi/Sviones," I would now claim that Sevan in Armenia was founded by Abraham blood, and that the Swedes descend from that Sheba blood. Note that a major Germanic people whose origins are known only as far back as Sweden were the Suebi (or Suevi). If that doesn't spell "Sheba" all over, what does?

I repeated in multiple chapters of this book that the Bia peoples, who are said to have founded Lake Van in Armenia, became a peoples by a similar name in Greece and Europe. I had no idea where that theory was going to lead, and very little solid bases for even holding to the theory. It turned out leading to the Merovingians (progenitors of the Franks) even though I was determined to leave the Merovingians out of my research as much as was possible. Then I came across "Bias" and "Boiis" terms, found in Greek myth/history. But here, merely on day seven of my new Hebrew-Aryan theory, I find that the cousin of Buz may have founded Sevan, wherefore I'm scratching my head asking if Buz might have founded the Bia people. Might "Bia" have originally been "Bias"? Is this not at least a plausibility since a "Nairi" peoples were rulers at Lake Van???

As the Buzi Medes were probably sorcerers, as were their neighbors, the Magi Medes, it is perhaps meaningful that Herodotus considered the "Neuri" peoples to have been sorcerers, while others have identified them as Nahorites, an idea I have previously shunned for lack of evidence. The Neuri lived north of Thrace on the Bug river, and some do connect them to the Nairi of Lake Van. To substantiate that Nahor left behind a peoples by his own name, there is this statement online: "Nahor: The name Nahor, Abraham’s brother, has been found in the Mari texts when referring to a city by that name." Mari was on the Euphrates between Erech and Haran, but was also a land in Iran (in Margiana) next to Aria (land of the Aryans). It had been my suspicion that the Roman god, Mars, was a depiction of peoples from Mari, for it is "looked upon as the ancient Paradise, the cradle of the Aryan families of mankind..."

I had independently tied the Odin-worshipping Scandinavians to the blue-eyed and blonde "Budini," since that term is essentially equal to "Woten/Voten" (i.e. Odin). I had only found one other person online who took that position, all others seemed stumped or else pointed in general to the Thracians as the ancestors of the Swedes. It was only later when I discovered that, according to Herodotus, the Budini and the Neuri lived in each other's midst. And behold what I found yesterday, day six of my new theory:

"The 18th century Swedish historian Olof von Dalin wrote that the Neuri were a mixture of Scythians, Greeks and Hebrews who accompanied another race, the Budiner or "Shepherd Scythians", to the Swedish islands around 400 BC, because of pressure from the Macedonians."

Hocus Pocus, that came at me like a rabbit out of a hat, grinning.

However, one must be wary of the possibility that the author (Von Dalin) may have had a pre-conceived notion that the Neuri were Nahor's offspring, and for that reason alone concluded Hebrew blood as part of the Neuri.

Note that it was the Macedonians (i.e. MacEdonians) who chased the two allies to Scandinavia. In the same way that I view both the Edonians and the Budini as terms furnishing, "Odin," I view the two peoples as one, even the same as the Bithynians. In fact, the Bithyni are listed as a Thracian tribe (i.e. as are the Edones). In that case, since I view the Macedonians as Edonians, it would seem that the two were having a family conflict when the one was routed toward Sweden. A larger point is that the peoples of Greece to which I tied the bee/honey symbol had strong connection to Bithynia (details in a coming chapter).


Asshur! Guzuntight.
Exploring whether various Nahorites of Akkadia,
and Abrahamic Shebeans and Asshurites
become the Germanic peoples.

Table of Contents